Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle’s significance as an iconic piece of Ken Block’s legacy, highlighting its unique qualities and history. @racedeck, the seller, emphasized that the car is not just any build, but a representation of Ken Block's journey with Hoonigan and Gymkhana, noting its incredible maintenance and the emotional connection that many have to it. Commenters like @BackSeatDriver708 and @1600veloce praised the car’s craftsmanship, particularly the Millington Diamond engine, which was described as a masterpiece offering remarkable power and reliability. Fans appreciated the nostalgia and the cultural impact of Ken Block’s work, reminiscing about their experiences and his contributions to motorsport.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the car's mechanical specifications and historical context without strong emotional leanings. For instance, @pfricart inquired about the vehicle's drivetrain specifics while @RacerX1979 provided insights into its unique features such as the independent rear suspension and the dry sump setup, indicating the car's complex engineering. There were mentions of Ken Block's influence on the automotive community and the rare opportunity to own such a vehicle, with users debating its market value and potential bids as it nears auction end.
Negative: On the downside, some users expressed doubts about the car's valuation, with comments like @0die questioning why the bidding started so high for an Escort and @RoundHouseRealty sarcastically reflecting on the high bid amount in comparison to the car's stock version. There were also mixed reactions about how the auction process might unfold, with users like @Hoppy18 commenting on their own lack of experience with high-end vehicle auctions. While the nostalgia for Ken Block was prevalent, some comments suggested concern about the price being set due to celebrity provenance rather than the car's inherent qualities.
 |
 |
Positive: @PuristMiami (The Seller) expresses willingness to assist potential buyers, offering to answer questions and facilitate viewings throughout the week. @matstery admires the vehicle's appearance, questioning if the paint is still wet and calling it gorgeous. @Middler89 appreciates the aesthetic combination of the new red seats with the red wheels, noting that they complement each other beautifully. @MotoringInvestments describes the car as embodying 'stately' qualities, suggesting a refined presence. Overall, there is an appreciation for the car's beauty and uniqueness among some comments.
Neutral: @QuickStrike requests running, cold start, and driving videos to get a better sense of the car's performance. @pragmatic shares a nostalgic observation, recalling the last time they saw a similar model on Manhattan's FDR, indicating some familiarity with the vehicle's history. @TheOMDude provides historical context by mentioning Buick's innovative engineering with their OHV (overhead valve) engines, linking the brand's success to its racing victories and its popularity prior to the Model T.
Negative: @PNWBuick offers a critical perspective, questioning the car's condition after significant investment, implying it may have declined from its former state. @CalvadaKing expresses skepticism regarding the engine's performance, suggesting that it sounds like it is only running on five cylinders during a driving video. @BigRed critiques the choice of materials used in the upholstery, contrasting the current vinyl to what was typically fabric and decorative in similar vehicles of the era, aligning with @PNWBuick's sentiment that the modifications may have detracted from its original appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments celebrated the beauty and rarity of the Ferrari 512 BBi. @Moepoe expressed excitement, calling it a 'holy grail car from the golden age of Ferrari,' while @GDogg appreciated its presence on BaT, describing it as 'Bellissima!' Others, such as @cardude76 and @Hojo3rd, highlighted the driving experience, noting the precise steering and joy of driving these classic cars. @Captrich shared personal anecdotes about the model's historical significance, mentioning previous awards and achievements, which added to the car's value in the eyes of many bidders.
Neutral: Comments also included various inquiries about the vehicle's details and condition. @Acidreign and others posed questions about the timing belts, leakdown tests, and fuel tank cleanliness, indicating a keen interest in the car's maintenance history. @KrisG and @Leiniesbuddy sought clarification on the original paint, functionality of controls, and storage space within the vehicle, underscoring a mix of curiosity and appreciation among potential buyers. In response, @911r provided detailed information about service history, the state of the paint, and the car's features, helping to clarify these concerns.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some criticisms arose regarding potential issues with the car. @DonnyB pointed out concerns about the missing original exhaust system and specific components, suggesting these could affect the car's authenticity and value. @tvryan and others expressed concerns over the AC system not blowing cold, which could deter potential buyers looking for a fully functional classic. Additionally, @SpeedRx00 noted the rarity of achieving high sale prices for these models unless they are in pristine condition, indicating that bidders should be cautious about expectations surrounding investment and resale value.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's build quality and appearance. @jimmytheirishman praised it as a fantastic build and noted its fun factor. @Mark_Plum called it beautiful, suggesting it could command a high auction price of $250k. @jettjolene emphasized that there is no better Porsche for summer enjoyment than this one, highlighting the speedster style seats as a standout feature. @LilSnort and @zzracing acknowledged the quality of the Willhoit engine, appreciating the additional value of another engine included in the sale. Overall, there was a strong consensus on the vehicle's appeal and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding specific aspects of the car, reflecting a keen interest in its features and condition. @dontlabelme listed comprehensive inquiries about maintenance records, the condition of various components, and the specifications of wheels and tires. @jhlytle (The Seller) responded by promising to provide additional information and photos, assuring that the vehicle is well sorted and fun to drive. Despite some technical concerns, such as small image sizes in listings and potential misalignment of the exhaust pipe, the seller was proactive in addressing these issues and committed to resolving them.
Negative: A few commenters voiced skepticism or disappointment, with @flataircooled expressing frustration at failed attempts to purchase the car previously. @OldVelasco indicated disinterest at a lower price point, highlighting an expectation for higher bids. @DereksB questioned the necessity of repainting the vehicle this time, hinting at potential concerns about the vehicle's history or condition. Additionally, the cost implication of ownership was noted by @911s55, who lamented high registration fees associated with six-figure cars. Such comments reflected a cautious perspective on the purchase despite the vehicle's many praises.
|
 |
Positive: @Thomas54 praised the vehicle's appearance, noting it would look incredible in white and admired the potential for a 1965 grille and Shelby-style hood, referring to it as a "stunner". @bostonphil highlighted the improved look with the new TT wheels and commended the car's stance while appreciating that the back seat was retained. @johnnyjake expressed excitement, wishing the car was driven more often, and mentioned they were building a similar vehicle. Others shared their admiration, with @PSR calling it beautiful, and @NVGT350 agreeing with @CarFoolLane about its improved look, showing enthusiasm with emojis.
Neutral: Comments from @911r, the seller, addressed various inquiries about the car's specifications. They confirmed that the hood is fiberglass and the car is equipped with hydraulic lifters, while also providing a driving video link. @Skyman81 requested more technical details regarding the heads and cam, which @911r answered, indicating the use of RHS Pro Action heads and a COMP 270H-10 cam. Some commenters noted the alignment of the stripes, with @L8842767 questioning their centering, to which @911r acknowledged they were close but not perfect.
Negative: On the downside, @CarFoolLane pointed out their dissatisfaction with the previous wheel design and expressed concerns about the side stripes not accurately reflecting the GT350's designation. @Skyman81 and @CarFoolLane both raised issues regarding the lack of air conditioning, with the latter stating there was no mention of it in the vehicle's description, leading to concerns about comfort. Additionally, @Bill10 questioned the choice of header installation, finding it puzzling due to potential imbalances in flow and tuning.
|
 |
Positive: @Tigers196884 described the vehicle as a beautiful FJ, and @switchon4go praised it as a GREAT truck. @JR_Austin (The Seller) mentioned such positive feedbacks from potential buyers, as one interested buyer highlighted that it was 'definitely one of the good ones' and a 'keeper.' @dcbogert, an aircraft mechanic, expressed relief that the car had been driven regularly during the owner's time overseas, indicating that it looks like a nice FJ.
Neutral: @Benandaliza and @Lurvey raised questions about the vehicle's ownership history shown on Carfax and inquired about the rear-end accident. @cserva and @barry1080 expressed interest in seeing the car and test driving it, while @Acatstanton requested a picture of the DOT code on the tires. @LewisGabe425 wanted clarification on who maintained the vehicle during the owner's absence overseas, and @Nolo asked for trunk pictures.
Negative: @Lurvey voiced concern regarding the rear-end accident as well. @Elementnomore noted potential issues with the automatic transmission in the 2007 models after significant mileage. @dcbogert expressed worries about the vehicle's mechanical condition after sitting for ten years, highlighting that neglect can lead to engine problems. @TDown and @CliffyDeuce asked for additional details about the driver seat and the spare tire cover, indicating potential uncertainties about the car.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a 2020 Porsche Macan Turbo, is praised for its cosmetic and mechanical presentation with over 60k miles. @Carneed (The Seller) states it has been recently serviced, including a fresh oil change, and drives as expected. Comments highlight the vehicle's handling, with @ttop suggesting showcasing the active suspension, indicating its versatility to be raised or lowered. The tires are fresh with good tread, and the brake pad life is noted to be decent, showcasing attention to maintenance that potential buyers appreciate.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Douglascc and @Reid, inquire about the maintenance history, specifically regarding spark plugs, PDK service, and potential gaps in oil changes. @Camp170 raises concerns about the engine noise captured in the video, suggesting it might need a compression test, while @Rudy333 provides insights into how different microphones can affect sound quality in recordings. The discussion reflects an interest in understanding the car's history and performance before making a purchase, suggesting that while the vehicle looks good, buyers are seeking comprehensive details to ensure value.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's maintenance are evident, especially regarding the lack of documentation for key services like PDK fluid changes and spark plug replacements. @Camp170 specifically mentions a worrying noise from the engine, equating it to issues they've seen in similar models. @Reid reinforces this by highlighting recommended services that appear to be pending for the next owner, amplifying worries about potential additional costs. Such concerns about the vehicle's reliability may deter some buyers who are looking for a fully documented service history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive comments for its appealing design, with @Gmmuscleusa mentioning it resembles a 'shrunk down 787B!' This design sentiment is echoed by @Slam105, who appreciates Gmmuscleusa's insight. The seller, @777_matt, provides additional incentives by offering a second set of wheels along with the car and confirms that it is road legal with a clean title, making it an attractive option for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments indicate that there are practical aspects to consider regarding the vehicle's condition. @md11king expressed interest in viewing the car in person, which @777_matt agreed to, subject to the guidelines of BaT. Another user, @cincycaddy, raised a question about the speedometer's functionality, to which @777_matt acknowledged the speedometer is not currently working due to likely electrical issues, putting a spotlight on an area of concern for potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, there are some concerns related to the vehicle's state. @cincycaddy pointed out that the speedometer and odometer appear non-operational, which @777_matt confirmed as an issue. Additionally, @Tedfromohio questioned the appearance of a chain wrapped around the tailpipe in one photo, to which @777_matt explained it was a creative repair by the previous owner during a track weekend, indicating potential hack repairs on the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Spider_Mike described the vehicle as the "Chuck Norris of trucks," indicating a strong admiration for its capability and performance. @shady-james complimented the truck's overall beauty and asked about its paint condition, to which @JCWilkie (The Seller) confirmed it has 100% original paint and no significant dents, enhancing the attractiveness of the vehicle. Furthermore, @JCWilkie (The Seller) highlighted that the truck has a transferable Platinum extended warranty until 2026, covering the new engine and supercharger, adding to the peace of mind for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @Degencarguy asked about tire date codes, tread depth, and brake pad condition. @JCWilkie (The Seller) provided detailed responses, stating the tire dates and mentioning that the tread depth is between 1/4" and 3/8". The seller also confirmed that the truck has always been garaged and stated that the brake pads are in good working order. In addition, service records are available for potential buyers to review, ensuring transparency regarding the truck's history.
Negative: @denoncourt raised concerns about possible damage to the vehicle, specifically regarding the door fitment and a black piece that appeared damaged. In response, @JCWilkie (The Seller) reassured that there is no actual damage apart from minor rock chips and offered to provide additional photos for verification. This highlights a slight negativity surrounding the perception of the truck's physical condition, although it seems to be addressed adequately by the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetic and build quality. @mef0629 described it as a "beautiful build," while @goose747 echoed this sentiment with additional enthusiasm. @rustyray expressed admiration for the Chevy V8 conversion, suggesting that those who experienced it would appreciate its performance. @boaboyoz called it a "fine looking FJ40" and noted the build's tastiness. @Jredford and @rboothe also complimented the vehicle's appearance, with @GLCTraveler recognizing the nicely done restoration.
Neutral: Some comments served as inquiries or requests for more information. @GLCTraveler asked for additional photos and clarifications concerning various parts and modifications of the vehicle, indicating an interest in its structural integrity and modifications like the headers. @Av8RMAN questioned the original color of the truck, which led @Shinyman (The Seller) to confirm its history. @Shinyman also addressed several questions regarding features like power steering, the original color, and sticker removals, showing that potential buyers were engaged and attentive.
Negative: A few comments reflected dissatisfaction or concerns regarding specific aspects. @kayak expressed a desire for the LSU and GT stickers to be removed, while noting the truck's good appearance. @Ramseneer lamented the change from the original sand color, suggesting it should have remained that way. Additionally, @tlcamg pointed out concerns about the exhaust pipes hanging low, indicating potential issues in rough terrain. Such comments demonstrate that while the vehicle received flattering remarks, some aspects prompted criticism or reservations.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the aesthetic appeal and performance of the 2001 BMW 330Ci Convertible. @watchcarefully highlighted their appreciation for the staggered Style 68 wheels, noting how well they complemented the car's design. @TachiT, despite typically not favoring red cars, praised the model as 'handsome' and shared their own nostalgic connection to the same car. Other users like @HeavyTank77 acknowledged the quality of BMW vehicles from this era, with one stating, 'BMW could do no wrong during this era.' Additionally, @corkscrewlife and @azdrenr expressed interest in the vehicle's specifications and commented on its desirability in the current market.
Neutral: Several comments pointed out factual information about the car that might be relevant for potential buyers. @LG1971gSX suggested that the seller mention the car's 5-speed manual transmission in their listing, and this was subsequently addressed by the seller in follow-up comments. @JoshRan inquired about the car's maintenance history and received confirmations from the seller regarding the condition of the cooling system and absence of leaks in the roof. Furthermore, comments regarding the car’s paint and specific variants like 'HELLROT RED' added clarity about its aesthetic attributes, while @Wildcat1957 sought details on brake pad conditions, highlighting an interest in safety and reliability.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance and overall condition due to its age, which could impact buyers' decisions. @Willwill noted that while the car had low mileage, the age-related issues, particularly in the cooling system, could be problematic. @LG1971gSX mentioned a peculiar noise when the car's top was operated, indicating potential mechanical issues. Additionally, @JoshRan requested confirmation on the trunk space and spare tire presence, while @fasthonda and @Sidewayzbmw asked logistical questions regarding the pickup and transportation of the vehicle, suggesting buyer hesitations regarding the transaction process.
|
33-Years-Family-Owned 1993 Ford F-150 XLT Lariat SuperCab Flareside 5.8L 4×4
1FTEX14H3PKA54740
Lot 236188
Private Party
 |
Positive: @jamieboy57 (The Seller) mentions that the truck has been well taken care of, being garaged from new until 1997 and later kept under a covered car canopy with a cover. The maintenance practices included regular cleaning after snow and consistent washing, indicating that the vehicle has been protected from significant wear and tear. This care has resulted in no frame rot, although there may be some surface rust and old undercoating coming off, which shows overall positive maintenance and condition.
Neutral: @WashingtonKR inquires about the truck's location in Seattle and expresses interest in a test drive, suggesting a potential buyer's interest. This comment reflects a common practice among buyers who want to assess the vehicle firsthand before making a decision. @jamieboy57 (The Seller) responds positively, providing his location and inviting @WashingtonKR to share his contact information to arrange a test drive, showing a willingness to facilitate the sale process.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects of the vehicle's care, @jamieboy57 (The Seller) also mentions that the truck has not been licensed since 2014 and has suffered from physical issues and aftermarket body parts. This raises concerns about its usability and legal status on the road. Potential buyers might find the lack of recent licensing and the seller's description of physical issues to be red flags in considering the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @CScrogham (The Seller) expressed pride in their well-maintained Audi, emphasizing its appealing design, particularly the dash layout, and confirming that it has provided a smooth driving experience. Other commenters, like @SWBGT, praised the same model for its enjoyable driving characteristics and decent gas mileage, while @MTH shared positive experiences from a rental, calling it fun to drive. Additionally, @Corbee complimented the car's maintenance and highlighted the exemplary care taken by the owners, wishing for such meticulous upkeep to be standard among car owners.
Neutral: @kirker noted that their mom has a similar model of the car and found it engaging to drive, albeit with some limitations in acceleration compared to competitors. While there were mentions of certain luxury features like wireless CarPlay and heated steering wheels being absent, the overall impression remained positive due to the car's design and handling capabilities. @CScrogham confirmed that CarPlay functions well and emphasized the transformative impact of the high-quality Michelin tires on the driving experience.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the Audi Q3's lack of features that some may expect from a luxury vehicle, such as standard cold-weather comforts and advanced technology options available in less expensive brands. @kirker pointed out that the absence of these features seems odd for a mid-to-high-end German car, noting that while the driving experience and aesthetics are commendable, some quirks might deter potential buyers. @HappiestDays also inquired about major carbon service, reflecting a concern for maintenance and running issues, which @CScrogham addressed by mentioning the exclusive use of premium fuel and no current issues.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement and admiration for the 2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt, highlighting its impressive performance features and aesthetic appeal. @Lakesidemn mentioned being very impressed with the Bullitt and appreciates the unique features, while @sgmoran praised the car's specifications and versatile driving modes. Others, like @mitskrap, emphasize the exceptional care and maintenance history of the vehicle, noting its great condition and attention to detail that links back to previous owners.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specific inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @Wheelyneat asked about the service history for the brakes and made inquiries about the tint applied to the windows. @ThePencil inquired about the functionality of the exhaust valve and MagneRide damping system, showing interest in technical aspects of the car. Seller @911r provided detailed responses about the vehicle's maintenance and features, showcasing a commitment to transparency and engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: There were a few expressions of regret and disappointment, although not specifically about the car itself. @ISeeInHD expressed frustration over missing out on a previously listed vehicle with very low mileage that sold for a lower price. @jcarl51 offered skepticism regarding the age of certain parts of the vehicle based on their experience in the car business, creating a hint of doubt. There were also inquiries about any previous issues mentioned in past sales, such as those from @Spundine, which indicate some concerns about the car's past performance.
|
 |
Positive: @GRG1 and @narwhal.roverland both express admiration for the vehicle, with @GRG1 calling it a "Wow!!" and @narwhal.roverland stating they want to buy it based on the photos alone. @krudmuphin and @Alwaysanother1 comment on the car's exceptional cleanliness and condition, respectively, indicating it appears ready to roll. @CMB-PA shares a positive personal experience related to a purchase made through BaT, suggesting that if the car is as good as it looks, it would make for an enjoyable journey. Additionally, @Tigers196884 describes the car as gorgeous, further enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focus on inquiries about the vehicle's service history and performance aspects, with @bimmere39m5, @drthokie, and @Alexgs2019 asking for specific details like timing belt service records and undercarriage photos. @4WHEEL_GERMAN (The Seller) has been responsive, providing updates and committing to post more photos, which indicates the seller's willingness to address buyer concerns. However, the lack of comprehensive prior service records has drawn attention from multiple users, such as @GRG1. Overall, there is a belief that the car is in good shape, as affirmed by comments about its condition and aesthetic.
Negative: On the more critical side, some users raised concerns over certain aspects of the vehicle. For example, @drthokie pointed out that some pictures seemed overly edited, questioning the true color of the car. @bimmere39m5 expressed concerns regarding the age of the timing belt and suggested that the sale price might benefit from having that maintenance completed. @Fargie and @jmartin923 also brought up potential issues related to emissions compliance and key functionalities, indicating these factors could impact buyer confidence. Moreover, concerns about the uniqueness and practicality of the vehicle were voiced by @wg81, underlining the presence of some reservations among commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express excitement and admiration for the Stroppe Bronco, with several users sharing their personal connections to the vehicle and the Stroppe brand. @Ngsd101 and @MontanaBroncos show enthusiasm for the Bronco's rarity and its storied past, while @YennaM declares a strong desire to win the auction without hesitation due to the vehicle's aesthetic appeal. The seller, @artoftime, thanks the community for their support and emphasizes the car's honest wear and the unique chance that buyers have to enjoy the Bronco as it is or restore it to their preference.
Neutral: There is a mix of technical inquiries and discussions regarding the vehicle's specifications and modifications, with users like @Todd_Z and @fryklda sharing insights about the Bronco's restoration history and components like the transmission and roll bar. Questions regarding the vehicle's features, such as the air conditioning system and the roll bar style, suggest a focus on details that potential buyers may appreciate. The seller actively engages with these comments, providing clarifications and inviting further questions to ensure transparency.
Negative: Some comments express concerns over specific modifications and authenticity of parts on the Bronco. @iEdge questions the roll bar's authenticity and @highgeer mentions the wheels not being the original style, leading to some discussions about changes made during restoration. Additionally, @RoundHouseRealty highlights the steep cost of maintenance for classic vehicles, which could deter some potential bidders. @Kern911's request for more detailed images points to potential missing information about the vehicle's history that could raise concerns among collectors.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's color combination, noting it as one of its standout features. @Motohead323 remarked on the nice color combo, which @gtjoey1314 echoed by expressing excitement over the beautiful match of Midnight Blue over Sahara Tan leather. @Ferrariboy35, the seller, enthusiastically shared that this car has been a part of their personal collection since 2015 and is well-kept, garaged, and serviced regularly. The combination of the car’s great aesthetic and refined interior, as @Ferrariboy35 described, seemed to resonate positively with several participants, applauding its elegant look and luxurious features.
Neutral feedback included comments about the vehicle's specifications and service history. @jadidas raised valid concerns about the clutch calibration, which was addressed by @Ferrariboy35, affirming that it had been successfully calibrated and commended for its excellent condition, while also pointing out the beauty of the car's undercarriage. Additionally, @JCDoubleU inquired about an open recall regarding seat heaters, to which @Ferrariboy35 assured potential buyers of assistance with any necessary recalls, indicating a proactive approach to maintaining the car's integrity. Moreover, @Speedraser provided insights into the V8 Vantage’s clutch issues, outlining that concerns about it may be overstated, delivering a balanced perspective on the vehicle's reliability.
Negative remarks focused on potential issues that might concern prospective buyers. @jadidas indicated a concern regarding the clutch replacement, perceiving it as a significant expense for Vantage owners. While @Speedraser attempted to alleviate these worries, suggesting that issues vary widely based on driving styles, the underlying concern about maintenance costs remained. Additionally, @WouldYaLookatThat asked if any paint correction or protective installations had been applied, hinting at the need for potential scrutiny on paint condition despite the seller's affirmations. Overall, while enthusiasm for the car was prevalent, some comments reflected caution regarding upkeep and reliability.
Neutral:
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @WalterSharp reminisces about his first car, expressing nostalgia for the custom features of the 1950 Mercury, highlighting its appeal as a classic. @BubbaHo-Tep praises the vehicle as an amazing cruiser, and @johnny0620 admires its beauty and American craftsmanship. @mike_rockwell appreciates the quality of the build and notes it has true custom touches, while @Revsrav finds it a beautiful platform for customization and enjoys the sound of the engine. Meanwhile, @59caddyman, the seller, emphasizes the car's high-quality restoration, excellent fit and finish, and the iconic nature of this classic vehicle.
Neutral: @nikh99 asks about the suspension modifications needed for ground clearance, which @59caddyman answers, noting it previously had air ride and could be converted back with investment. @ButWhatDoIKnow inquires about the vehicle's AC and rear windows, receiving clear responses from the seller, while @Shoovel questions about potential water stains and air shock functionalities on the car, to which @59caddyman clarifies about the condition of the headliner and the system's status.
Negative: @BigDog71RT raises concerns about headroom in the chopped top design and the absence of heating elements, prompting clarification from @59caddyman that headroom is ample for taller individuals and that a vintage AC setup could be easily added for heating. @Oldwizard32 asks about the rear-end ratio and heater, reflecting a bit of uncertainty regarding the vehicle's setup. Additionally, @Jonestownhogboy worries whether all electrical components, like instruments and windows, function properly, leading to @59caddyman's admission about the radio being an unknown. The concerns highlight areas where potential buyers may have reservations.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the seller, @59caddyman, for their transparency and detailed description of the car's condition. They appreciate the car's solid structure and believe it has potential as a project. @cpcooper expressed enthusiasm about the car needing repairs, indicating it's the type of project they enjoy. Others, like @High_Hope, acknowledged the value of a straight body with minimal rust, expressing interest in bidding on the car depending on future bids.
Neutral: Comments included a mix of curiosity and constructive inquiries about the vehicle's mechanical issues and history. Many users requested further information, like the results of a compression test, photos of the broken axle, and specifics about the car's fuel system. @zeros suggested practical steps for addressing the fuel issues, while other users noted the discrepancy in the car's color and referenced specific restoration concerns, combining both positive feedback and caution about vehicle repairs.
Negative: However, there were significant concerns raised about the vehicle's overall condition. Users like @High_Hope cautioned potential buyers about aspects like the car's non-running status and various mechanical issues that could complicate restoration. @Oreo144 and @JTTR1 pointed out worries regarding the visible body filler, paint cracks, and basic maintenance needs that may not be readily apparent to new buyers. @Ron69 noted skepticism about the broken axle claim, warning that it might indicate deeper underlying issues with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @CZcarsnetLLC (The Seller) highlights the impressive condition of the 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL 500, emphasizing that it doesn't look its age and assures potential buyers that they can bid with confidence, suggesting the vehicle will impress onlookers. The seller provides additional reassurance regarding the functionalities of major components such as the convertible top, power seats, and radio, all of which work perfectly according to them. They also mention the tires and their specifications clearly, indicating thoroughness in their approach.
Neutral: Various potential buyers are showing interest in the vehicle and are seeking clarification on several issues. @ricknur asks for details about the operation of the vehicle's top, as well as the functionality of the heated and ventilated seats, radio, and the current tire condition. @Tedfromohio inquires about the meaning of the SRS light, indicating a need for further understanding of the vehicle’s features and warnings. Meanwhile, @CZcarsnetLLC acknowledges these concerns and provides some basic information about the current dashboard warning, only mentioning the SRS light as present.
Negative: @Brianlowe expresses concern regarding potential brake issues, which raises questions about the vehicle's overall safety and condition. This comment may suggest a lack of trust in the vehicle's upkeep or clarity on its current working status, which might concern other potential buyers. Additionally, @ricknur's inquiry regarding fire details indicates a level of apprehension about safety, suggesting that some buyers are keen to verify that all systems are functioning without risk before committing to the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect enthusiasm and excitement about the vehicle and its auction listing. @boaboyoz called it a 'FUN and super cool listing,' praising its connection to a great cause, GLWTA. @I-need911 expressed excitement about the opportunity, stating someone is about to have an 'experience of a lifetime.' Additionally, @VintiqueMotors highlighted the fun aspects of the listing, mentioning exciting activities like off-roading and fishing with a positive tone, while also underscoring the charitable nature of the event.
Neutral: Several commenters show a casual interest in the auction and its context. @tlcamg expressed a feeling of nostalgia and would have participated if younger, indicating the vehicle’s appeal across generations. @Beans_Bacon mentioned the numerous listings from the 43 Institute and seemed to recognize the significance of the day, particularly in relation to Ken Block, although maintaining a neutral tone regarding the auction itself. @43Institute (The Seller) engaged with various commenters, providing updates and showcase details about the charitable mission behind the auction.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments about the vehicle or the auction. However, @Tigers196884 requested more action photos for the listings, which could imply that they feel the current visuals do not fully capture the vehicle's appeal. Furthermore, @steveracer noted a target bid that seems to reflect a competitive spirit rather than dissatisfaction, as they aim for a high minimum bid, suggesting high expectations but no direct negativity towards the auction itself.
|
 |
Positive: @seanfrontz praised the vehicle as a "Classic Triple White" and wished luck for its sale, suggesting it should do well. @Yetanother expressed love for the Bug, particularly its white-on-white style, reminiscing about his wife's college car. @estesremodeling (The Seller) highlighted that the vehicle has had a recent service with a new master cylinder and brake lines, emphasizing its mechanical soundness and inviting potential buyers to take it for a ride.
Neutral: @APLANTEDLEIF remarked on the enduring presence of vintage Beetles in the market, showing appreciation for their lasting impact regardless of their condition. @estesremodeling (The Seller) explained that the car had only been driven 500 miles in nine years due to the owner feeling uncomfortable navigating traffic, while also clarifying that the rear windows roll up rather than being hinged as some commenters suggested. @DougeFresh321 noted that the rear windows operate differently than indicated, adding a personal touch by sharing their ownership experience of a similar vehicle.
Negative: @PMB-BTR raised concerns about what appeared to be damage and discoloration on the tire well, initially assuming it to be collision-related and asking for clarification. @compras also observed signs that suggested possible collision damage, specifically commenting on the wrinkled appearance of the spare wheel well. Despite these issues, @estesremodeling (The Seller) admitted the lack of definitive history on past collisions, while trying to reassure potential buyers about the car’s highway performance.
|
 |
Positive: @W4llace noted that the car looks exceptional in blue, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal compared to other colors. @Eurocharged echoed this sentiment, expressing admiration for the vehicle's stunning color. @Penti and others also recognized the reasonable mileage of the WR Blue Blobeye, appreciating its overall condition, while @flat_6six complimented the car's cleanliness and wished the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: In the discussion regarding specifics of the vehicle, @TBforty40 (The Seller) provided insights into the condition of the car, noting that the engine is stock and has not required significant repairs. He responded to inquiries about the timing belt and water pump services, acknowledging the limited documentation he had but confirming some maintenance history. @Joem26 and others sought further details on oil consumption and requested tests to gauge the vehicle's mechanical health, showcasing a mix of curiosity and caution among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arose about the vehicle's performance from several users. @Whatarush23 pointed out discrepancies regarding the lug pattern, suggesting potential inconsistencies with the vehicle’s specifications. Additionally, @Joem26 pressed for more information on oil consumption, hinting that the seller’s reported minimal amounts raised red flags for some, while the community member @maxx_headroom suggested that knowing the oil consumption more precisely could help gauge engine health. @WarpedMann questioned if the vehicle was suitable for long-distance driving, pointing to potential issues with tire age that @TBforty40 acknowledged as a concern.
|
Twin-Plug 3.4L-Powered 1985 Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe M491
WP0AB091XFS121805
Lot 236198
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Eurocharged described the vehicle as stunning, capturing the admiration of many. @theforce88 also praised the car, wishing the seller good luck with the sale, while @leftlane11 expressed nostalgia and fondness for the Porsche 911 as the poster car of their youth. @Flsupraguy, @Profcarnut, and @BSAutomotive all shared positive sentiments about the vehicle's design and reputation, with @Profcarnut mentioning the stunning appearance of the car as witnessed in person.
Neutral: @ChrisF1 posed several legitimate questions to @BADURAN505 regarding the sale timing, emissions equipment, and the vehicle's engine performance at higher RPMs. @Flsupraguy inquired about the car's weight and cruise control options, showing interest in technical specifications. @Bu329848 asked for any available driving videos, indicating a common practice for potential buyers of performance vehicles to seek further demonstration of capability.
Negative: @FoxyCleopatra raised a concern about the surprisingly low mileage of only 300 and the quick turnover time since purchase, questioning the reasons behind the sale. While the seller provided explanations, questions about the timing may cause skepticism among potential buyers. Such inquiries could detract from the perceived value of the vehicle, leaving room for doubt regarding its reliability or history.
|
 |
Positive: @GBRBiLL notes that the vehicle is a clean looking NAS D90 in a desirable color, expressing confidence that it hasn't encountered significant corrosion issues. The comment suggests a sense of optimism about its condition and encourages good luck with the sale.
Neutral: Several commenters raise requests for more detailed pictures to assess the vehicle more thoroughly, highlighting the need for images of specific areas such as the floors, under mats, and rear crossmember. @CapeCod69 points out that there is a more detailed listing for the vehicle elsewhere for a higher price, while @WAGONBOYTD mentions that the mileage seems inconsistent with a previous listing, indicating the importance of verification in assessing the vehicle's history.
Negative: @ByronLakeway expresses concern that the seller needs to provide more pictures to justify the asking price, while @WAGONBOYTD mentions doubts about the accuracy of the carfax report, indicating a lack of trust. Additionally, @CapeCod69 questions an unusual wire found on the vehicle, to which @Zapm (The Seller) admits he does not know what it is, contributing to buyer concerns over transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @TargaJohanSF provided information about the vehicle's fuel efficiency, noting that the GLS 63 AMG achieves approximately 16 MPG combined, 14 MPG in the city, and 18 MPG on the highway. This suggests that it is relatively fuel-efficient for a luxury SUV, which could be appealing to potential buyers looking for both luxury and practicality.
Neutral: @BentleyIndy (The Seller) addressed several inquiries from potential buyers. They provided clarification on the vehicle's information packet by sharing an image of the IPacket sticker in response to @G.O.G.B. Additionally, @flhrci1450 asked about the number of keys, to which @BentleyIndy confirmed there are 2 keys available with the vehicle.
Negative: Conversely, questions about the vehicle's seating capabilities raised concerns. @Bartrix inquired if the second-row seats fold down flat, expressing uncertainty given their previous experience with bench-type seating. Furthermore, @oehninger's inquiry on the vehicle's assembly location indicates a concern regarding manufacturing quality, specifically asking if the vehicle is built in Alabama.
|
 |
Positive: @rugerthesheperd described the vehicle as gorgeous, showcasing an appreciation for its aesthetic appeal. @geoffkinney (The Seller) elaborated on the fun driving experience, indicating that driving with the doors off and the top down adds to the enjoyment, while also highlighting the importance of applying sunscreen. The vehicle's performance was praised, with @geoffkinney mentioning that it can cruise comfortably at 65 mph at lower RPMs thanks to its 4-speed transmission and gearing.
Neutral: @SchimmelHaus questioned the placement of the battery behind the back seat, while @fsacb3 speculated that this is likely due to space constraints in the engine bay. @geoffkinney explained that this arrangement offers better security for the battery and helps clean up the engine bay's appearance. Concerns about the vehicle's design were brought up by @Big_DaddyRL, who described it as fundamentally dangerous but admitted to loving it, demonstrating a mix of admiration and apprehension about the vehicle's performance capabilities.
Negative: @Big_DaddyRL expressed strong concerns about the vehicle's power, believing that a Jeep with a 327 engine is irresponsibly overpowered, raising questions about safety. This sentiment reflects some worries regarding the vehicle's overall riskiness. Additionally, inquiries about the vehicle's details, such as the nature of the decals asked by @BigWings, indicate that there are aspects that potential buyers or enthusiasts might find puzzling or needing further clarification.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's condition, noting that it looks incredible in person and has a comprehensive history of service documentation, although some early paperwork is missing. @dp2001 highlighted the car's well-cared-for status and suggested that the seller is transparent and accommodating regarding inquiries. The seller, @wheelsupsocal, has been helpful in clarifying potential concerns about various issues raised by commenters, suggesting a willingness to work with bidders on the registration process and making arrangements for shipping if needed.
Neutral: Several questions were raised about the vehicle's history and current condition, particularly concerning the timing chain replacement noted by @stuartroy and @wheelsupsocal, who indicated that no paperwork confirms this work was done. Additionally, @Reaganista asked for details regarding the air conditioning and blinkers, prompting the seller to clarify that the AC is currently disconnected, and the turn signals do not work. The mention of 'Planned Non-Operation' by @SouthernDriver opened up discussions around the vehicle's registration status and ability to be driven in California without issues, with the seller providing clear guidance on registration protocols.
Negative: Concerns were expressed by several commenters regarding the vehicle's functionality and potential issues. @SouthernDriver noted worries about the condition of the top, questioning whether it could rip if fully closed. Similarly, @Reaganista sought clarification on the malfunctioning air conditioning and turn signals, indicating potential electrical issues. @stuartroy's inquiry about the timing chain replacement revealed a potential maintenance oversight, as the lack of receipts raises questions about the vehicle's overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @Bentmetal (The Seller) shares that the vehicle has been a great experience as an entry into Aston Martin ownership, describing it as pretty much trouble-free, aside from a past incident with a valet which resulted in a transmission issue that was promptly resolved. The seller emphasizes that all aspects of the car function perfectly and reassures that it has been maintained well over the years, ensuring a smooth drive with no slipping during shifts. Additionally, @Bentmetal provides reassurance about the operating condition of the windows, confirming that they open correctly and seal without wind noise.
Neutral: @handyman1 inquires about the passenger dashboard, suggesting that the leather might have come unglued and requests better pictures. @Bentmetal responds acknowledging this request and agrees to provide additional photos along with the car's receipts. @robu asks for more detailed information regarding the transmission repair carried out in December 2024, specifically inquiring if the clutch was replaced; @Bentmetal replies that the vehicle shifts beautifully and no clutch change was necessary, indicating there had only been an issue with the shifter mechanism.
Negative: Despite @Bentmetal's positive experiences, @handyman1's concern about the passenger dashboard's leather being unglued raises potential issues regarding the car's interior quality. This concern is acknowledged by @Bentmetal, who is willing to share more images, but it highlights a potential flaw in the vehicle's maintenance history. Additionally, the fact that the windows now work, as mentioned by @Bentmetal, was not initially clear, which could indicate prior functionality issues that might be concerning to potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @JKB expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, mentioning that it is fun to drive and exciting to own. @boaboyoz praises the car as a fantastic specimen, highlighting its GT Silver Metallic color and wishing luck on the sale. Additionally, @SSJVegita admires the unique carbon fiber roof options, stating it beautifully fits the car's purpose, while @Mfwm3 compliments the car's perfect options and thanks @borissaid for his past instruction, wishing him luck with the sale.
Neutral: @EseVato asks for more information about the replacement catalytic converter, questioning why it needed to be replaced. @Route66 requests a DME report to gather more technical information about the vehicle. Several users, including @EddieB, inquire repeatedly about the DME report, indicating that it's a concern for potential bidders, while @LUV_AV8R seeks clarification regarding the presence of paint protection film (PPF) on the car.
Negative: @mhei2521 raises concern about the smoking package, asking whether it indicates that the car has been smoked in. @LUV_AV8R also notes that the front lip appears to be damaged, questioning whether it is easy to replace and expressing surprise about the damage considering the car's features like a front axle lift. Lastly, @RedNsx91 comments on the lack of pictures, particularly requesting more images of the underside, revealing concerns over the available visual information.
|
 |
Positive: @70_duster appreciates Honda ATVs, indicating they are a reliable choice for buyers. @Spider_Mike humorously adds that all the vehicle needs is a Mr. Plow jacket, suggesting it has a playful charm. According to @septuagenerian, the seller, the ATV has a rich history of being well-maintained, runs like new despite its age, and is capable of performing various tasks such as moving dirt and snow, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: @olddatsun12 asks about a possible wet spot in the images, receiving clarification from @septuagenerian, who confirms it’s just shade and reassures that the motor does not leak. Another inquiry from @olddatsun12 about the vehicle's hours of operation is met with @septuagenerian's response that there is no hour meter available to calculate that. @Tedfromohio questions the capacity of the vehicle, noting it is only 2WD, to which @septuagenerian confirms but mentions that chains are included even though they have never been needed.
Negative: @RayRomo raises concerns about the timeframe for pickup after purchase, indicating there could be logistical issues to consider, especially with a trip planned to Colorado. This implies potential complications for buyers who may want to factor in their own travel schedules when arranging for pick-up, potentially detracting from the buying experience. Additionally, @Gary_T1 expresses frustration over the timing of the listing, suggesting that it could have been sold to a buyer on the East Coast earlier, hinting at missed opportunities thus affecting interest.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the 1973 Datsun 240Z, praising its aesthetic appeal and nostalgic value. @DCenthusiast described it as a "beautiful survivor" and noted the joy of driving it. @Oldhockyplayr shared fond memories of driving a similar model, emphasizing its reliability and ability to attract admiration. Commenters like @artpirate333 and @SParis echoed these sentiments, highlighting the car’s clean condition and stunning appearance. Overall, the car is celebrated for its classic design and the passionate response it elicits from car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some users, including @Pivo and @LS7heaven, engaged in practical discussions about the vehicle's modifications, such as the impact of a strut tower brace on performance. These comments indicate an interest in the technical aspects of the car, showcasing different perspectives on its usability and potential enhancements. Additionally, @Berend15 suggested a need for more comprehensive explanations of the vehicle's electrical features, suggesting that while the listing is effective, detailed descriptions could improve buyer confidence.
Negative: Not all comments were purely positive; @Berend15 pointed out the need for better documentation regarding the vehicle's electrical functions, highlighting potential concerns for prospective buyers. This raised a valid point about the importance of transparency regarding possible issues that may arise, such as electrical gremlins. While the overall feedback is supportive of the vehicle’s appeal, this concern illustrates the necessity for thoroughness in listings, as any shortcomings could affect buyer interest.
|
 |
Positive: @GRiehl (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about selling the R-Class, noting its appeal to mini-van lovers. He encourages potential buyers to engage with the extensive media provided, emphasizing that it contains valuable information that may answer many questions. The seller also highlights his experience with previous auctions and invites interested parties to review his past performance, which reflects his commitment to transparency and customer service. Additionally, @TommyB-1123 appreciates the seller's assistance and compliments the vehicle, indicating a positive interaction.
Neutral: Several comments show curiosity about the vehicle's features, like the folding seats and towing capabilities. @bigcreek inquires about the headliner replacement, while @thersh6232 questions its suitability for use as a tow behind RV. @PhantomMensa asks for transport quotes, and @TommyB-1123 seeks clarity on how the seats function. @BigBodyLex provides an explanation about folding the seats, suggesting that proper steps are essential to maximize space in the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments reveal limitations or concerns about the vehicle. @TommyB-1123 points out that the second-row seats do not fold flat for easy loading and expresses frustration about the third seat being problematic. @PhantomMensa shares a worry regarding vehicle transport, mentioning damage from an auction experience, which makes him wary of using open transportation again. Furthermore, @GRiehl (The Seller) acknowledges the challenges with seat configurations, indicating that there may be misunderstandings or complications regarding the vehicle's usability.
|
 |
Positive: The 2000 Porsche Boxster being auctioned by @ExclusiveMotorClub is highlighted for its excellent performance and low mileage, which appeals to potential buyers. The recent servicing, including the smooth operation of the newly geared convertible top, adds to the vehicle's charm. @ExclusiveMotorClub assures buyers they can reach out with any questions, fostering a sense of confidence in the transaction.
Neutral: Several commenters raise questions regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance. @schmade inquires about the reason for its sale shortly after purchase, while @Bigphilly questions the IMS bearings. There are also implications that prospective owners would like to see the engine, as noted by @gsh2, and discussions about the engine and transmission maintenance records appear significant to those considering the purchase.
Negative: Some concerns have been expressed about the vehicle's condition. @1Ruhl points out potential paint work on the left door, and @rlaverty notes a crack in the windshield that wasn't clearly shown in the images. Additionally, there are inquiries about a 'factory rebuilt engine exchange' and the need for more information on this aspect, as indicated by @artwrangler76 and @rlaverty. The general sentiment among some potential buyers suggests cautious interest due to these issues.
|
Trophy Truck Ride-Along Experience w/Terrible Herbst Motorsports for 43 Institute
Lot 236248
Private Party
 |
Positive: Multiple commenters expressed their enthusiasm about the vehicle and the experience it offers. @43Institute highlighted the incredible opportunity to ride in a legendary Baja racing truck, emphasizing the thrill and bucket list nature of the experience. @LoudNotFast and @ktm_rick echoed this sentiment, with @ktm_rick specifically noting the excitement of winning a chance to ride. @Km19q shared personal testimonials, reminiscing about past rides in these trucks and describing them as among the wildest experiences they've had, capable of withstanding rough terrains that would challenge other vehicles.
Neutral: Several comments reflected an interest in the unique auction and event hosted by @43Institute, as well as the charitable aspects involved, such as supporting the 43 Institute mission. @Stumblingkarma expressed curiosity about the auction results, while @boaboyoz and @tlcamg recognized the event as a reflection of the charity component that has garnered attention. @Denalihacker47 inquired about the ride's duration, indicating a practical curiosity about the logistics of the event rather than expressing strong excitement or disappointment.
Negative: Some commenters showed reservations regarding the overall video presentation associated with the event. @mcj4250 noted that the chosen video didn't convey the sense of adventure typically seen in rally car videos, suggesting that the promotion could be enhanced for better engagement. @AliceAustin's comment expressed a mix of excitement and apprehension regarding the rides, indicating a fear of the thrill associated with racing trucks, which could deter some potential participants who might be intimidated by the speed and excitement.
|
 |
Positive: @BonnyT120 (The Seller) describes the bike as very easy to work on and notes that parts are readily available, which is a significant advantage for maintenance. The modifications made with the Fury head have greatly improved the bike's torque and drivability, creating a fun and engaging riding experience. Other commenters like @errcooled also share a positive sentiment, stating that the bike is beautiful and special, which indicates that the aesthetic and uniqueness of the vehicle are appreciated.
Neutral: @wingsbaby poses technical questions about the bike's shifting mechanism and the petcock settings, showing curiosity and interest, but without a strong positive or negative viewpoint. @uptownbro41 asks about the bike's comfort for highway travel, indicating a concern for practicality while also expressing a sense of intrigue about the Fury modification potentially increasing its horsepower. There is a general exchange of information among users discussing the bike's features and capabilities.
Negative: There are no outright negative comments about the bike in the provided excerpts. However, @CraigHTam53's inquiry about the third foot lever implies some confusion about the bike's design features, which could suggest that the bike may not be intuitive for all riders. Furthermore, the technical questions raised by others imply that some potential buyers could be concerned about understanding the bike's mechanics and suitability for their needs.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters express their admiration for the Ford Escape, highlighting its reliability and simplicity. @PMerkle finds the manual transmission appealing, noting the unique charm of the Escape's design and praising the durability of the Mazda 4 engine. @joeveto fondly remembers his time with the Escape, emphasizing its ease of maintenance and performance, particularly in winter conditions. Additionally, @Hatchtopia shares a nostalgic account of their own Escape, praising its straightforwardness and quoting maintenance experiences that demonstrate its reliability over many years. Overall, the car is portrayed as a solid choice for those looking for dependable, practical transportation.
Neutral: Several participants brought up features and specifications related to the Escape. @CMCraig inquired about the rear brakes and the condition of the transfer case, to which @CarsGlobal confirmed that there are no issues, reinforcing the Escape's performance reliability. @scottmadwi provided historical context about the XLS model's manual transmission availability, while others like @Excursion noted the vehicle's clean underside—a rarity for cars from the northeast. The comments indicate a mixture of nostalgia, inquiry, and interest in various technical aspects of the Escape.
Negative: Skepticism arose around certain maintenance aspects of the vehicle. @yellowc7vert raised concerns about potential leaks and asked for more details about the vehicle's keys and any issues worth addressing. @mikekirkman asked specifically about the absence of side-impact airbags, raising safety concerns. Moreover, @nick778 questioned the condition of the clutch, hinting that it might require attention soon given the vehicle's age and mileage. While the seller responded positively, these inquiries suggest potential worries among prospective buyers about the vehicle's long-term maintenance and safety features.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the Mercedes-Benz C140, with @MB-BKRPT noting the rarity and unique luxury of the vehicle. @whipcity76 shared personal experiences with the W140 series, highlighting its powerful V12 engine and impressive performance, which made driving an exhilarating experience. Others echoed similar sentiments about the vehicle's design and technology, appreciating the C140's status as one of the finest luxury cars of its era.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @nishboo brought up concerns regarding reports of front-end damage, which the seller (@4WHEEL_GERMAN) later clarified had been overstated. Comments from @mbruce and @UncleFred1 emphasized the importance of thorough service records and inspection to understand the car's true condition, noting the complexities of maintaining older luxury vehicles like the C140.
Negative: On a negative note, some commenters, including @boratdi and @jorma, expressed skepticism about the seller's claims regarding the vehicle's condition and the legitimacy of the presented repair history. Concerns about the lack of comprehensive service records and the potential for undisclosed issues were highlighted, particularly in relation to the front-end damage reported on Carfax. @mbruce voiced a desire for greater transparency about the car's past, indicating that the absence of a detailed maintenance history could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @flyingdago shared a positive experience, highlighting that their own 2005 model has reached nearly 250,000 miles and runs as if new, emphasizing the durability of Volvo vehicles and suggesting proper maintenance will keep them in good condition. According to @BGSM84 (The Seller), this car has been a dedicated daily driver for 19 years, garaged, and equipped with heated seats, cold AC, and the premium Dolby sound system, making it a reliable and enjoyable vehicle for trips.
Neutral: Several comments mention the importance of maintenance and inquire about various aspects of the vehicle. @dgray5 requested information on the timing belt change and tire date codes. @godawgs307 and @Old_Ned raised questions about potential leaks and service history, looking for reassurance on the vehicle's condition. @BGSM84 (The Seller) confirmed that certain parts like struts and control arms are original and offered to share a video demonstrating the oil cap glove test. @acb5461 mentioned their willingness to check out the car in person due to their experience with XC70 models.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the vehicle, particularly regarding potential leaks and the age of the timing belt, as indicated by @Schworer, who noted that the timing belt was last changed in 2015. @godawgs307 pointed out a wet underbelly pan, asking for clarification on leaks. Additionally, @flyingdago expressed skepticism about the need for transmission fluid changes despite Volvo's stance, reflecting common worries among potential buyers regarding maintenance and reliability in older models.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle's appearance and improvements made by the owner. @Wolfman2332 highlighted its attractive white color, while @Rweiss6 described it as a 'great looking Spider' with many smart modifications by a dedicated owner. They believe it could be a fantastic purchase for the next owner without needing any immediate attention. @GageDave even emphasized the 1.8L engine as one of the best choices due to its combination of torque and high rpm performance, suggesting it appeals to those interested in a balance of power and smooth driving.
Neutral: A few participants raised questions regarding specific vehicle features and conditions. @globaldiver inquired about the replacement engine's source and condition, while @iThom noted the presence of trim strips and requested additional photos to address common rust areas. @NYMINIT sought clarification about an alignment issue with the driver's seat frame, illustrating an active interest in the car's restoration work and current state.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters pointed out imperfections that detracted from the vehicle's value. @Wolfman2332 mentioned a tear in the driver's seat, expressing concern over the availability of red covers. @Fiatplus corrected a previous assumption about the trim strips, indicating they were likely dealer-installed rather than factory. @Anbele and @AlexKCMO discussed the challenges in repairing seat damage, further illustrating that while the car is visually appealing, it may require significant interior work.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple comments highlight the extraordinary condition and rarity of the 2007 Jaguar XJ Super V8, with @GulfStreamMotorCars emphasizing that it is the final year before the facelift and that super V8s in this condition will be highly sought after. @axios916 expresses a nostalgic appreciation for Jaguars, noting their beautiful design, while @wplong1 describes the vehicle as a modern classic. Commenters like @MBDWALSH also declare it an excellent specimen, indicating strong interest in potential bidding.
Neutral: Several inquiries address specific concerns regarding the vehicle’s features and maintenance, with @Adobe asking about the headliner’s separation and the trunk tools' completeness. @Rance6 and @Aftermidnight seek clarification on service records and maintenance specifics. @Setanta inquires about the vague term "recondition vehicle" as it appears in the Carfax report, while @2009XJ8 and @mjwood757 ask for details regarding repairs and potential issues observed in the photos.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters like @mjwood757 about the visual tilt of the car in photos, implying possible issues with the suspension despite @GulfStreamMotorCars' assurances that the suspension is new and the angle may be misleading. @Aftermidnight expresses skepticism about the vehicle's ability to traverse long distances without further inspection of major components such as the water pump and thermostat. Others, like @socalmugu, find the term "specimen" amusing, indicating that not all agree on the use of extravagant language when discussing a car they intend to use as a daily driver.
|
 |
Positive: @jb9573 highlights that the 2015 Porsche 911 Carrera GTS has been regularly maintained over the past four years and runs flawlessly without any issues. Having owned the vehicle for about four years and put around 8,000 miles on it, the seller assures potential buyers of a clean Carfax report with no accidents or damage, which adds to the car's reliability. @aba993997991 shares their positive experience with the GTS, noting a power increase to approximately 475 HP after performance tuning and praising its capabilities both on the track and as a daily driver. They believe this car will be a fantastic choice for anyone looking for a Porsche.
Neutral: @agent325 (The Seller) has provided detailed service records over the years, which helps build credibility. They clarify that the 40K service included the necessary maintenance that the vehicle required after four years of ownership. They also answer questions from prospective buyers about the car, including the sticker price of $129,100 and that factory paint protection film (PPF) is present only on the lower rear fenders. The seller’s engagement with the community, providing walk-around and drive videos, also contributes to creating a transparent selling process.
Negative: @Honda_Guy raised a concern regarding the servicing of the PDK transmission during the 40k service, questioning whether it was attended to; @agent325 (The Seller) confirmed that it was not serviced. Additionally, @KentGBR pointed out potential discrepancies related to the optional folding side mirrors versus standard features, suggesting some confusion about the specific car configuration. These comments indicate that while the car is well-regarded, there are still concerns from buyers about specific features and maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @MontanaBroncos appreciates the original family ownership, noting the vehicle has significantly low mileage with plenty of life left. @Geah shares their positive experience with a similar model, stating that their 88 TLC reached 285,000 miles with proper care, referring to these vehicles as tanks that provided safety for their children while learning to drive. @LeeK2025, the seller, reflects on the sentiment associated with the car, mentioning it was his first vehicle, and shares a nostalgic anecdote from his father about the reluctance of dealers to sell these vehicles because of their durability and long-lasting nature. @bringatrailer praises the seller for their detailed video updates, which seem to enhance the trust in the sale.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification about the vehicle's mechanical condition and functionality. @ziodesign asks specific questions regarding the working condition of the A/C, windows, and radio, also requesting video evidence of the startup and driving. @TreadstoneMotorsports expresses gratitude for the quick responses to questions and inquires about potential repairs that the seller would consider. @AustinMike also requests information regarding the A/C issue, aiming to understand its history better. Additionally, @LeeK2025 provides updates about the mechanical state, including past repairs and current issues, demonstrating transparency in the listing process.
Negative: There are concerns about various mechanical issues that may detract from the vehicle's appeal. @LeeK2025 admits that the radio is non-functional and provides a detailed description of the window mechanics, noting that while some windows work, others do not, which may cause frustration for potential buyers. @Onicamay96 raises a question regarding rust, and @LeeK2025 responds, downplaying the severity by stating that the rust is minimal, but any mention of rust can still imply future concerns for potential owners. Moreover, the A/C seems to be a recurring issue as @AustinMike and @Geah express concerns about its non-cooling capabilities and past repairs, suggesting that these problems could impact the overall desirability of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy expresses admiration for the vehicle, referring to it as an "absolute cream puff of a R107" and expressing a desire to own one like it. @antonvt appreciates the color combination, calling it "absolutely brilliant." Additionally, @socrates acknowledges the nice color combination and inquires about the condition of the fender repair, showing overall interest and positivity towards the vehicle's appearance.
Neutral: @RMJI shows interest in viewing the vehicle but asks for a convenient time for a visit. @SLGuy and @LeoMontes seek clarification and details regarding the front fender repair, with @SLGuy probing for specifics about the repair history and @LeoMontes wanting further information about its condition prior to the repair. @Phillug (The Seller) provides thorough responses to these inquiries, indicating that everything works as it should, and that no significant issues or warning lights are present on the vehicle.
Negative: @SLGuy expresses concern about the details of the front fender repair, suggesting that there may be issues that need addressing. @socrates raises questions about potential corrosion and damage that could be present around the fender and adjacent components, indicating a level of doubt about the condition of the vehicle prior to repairs. While this shows a level of caution, @Phillug (The Seller) addresses these concerns proactively by offering photos and additional information to help clarify the repairs made.
|
4k-Mile 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible 2SS RS Indy Pace Car Edition 6-Speed
2G1FT3DW4B9195068
Lot 236223
Dealer
 |
Positive: There are several positive comments highlighting the appeal and performance of the Camaro Indy 500 Pace Car replica. @DSultan compliments the car's aesthetics and expresses interest in the bidding process, appreciating its unique qualities. @goodfire14 describes it as a 'beast' and suggests it would be a great weekend driver, emphasizing the excitement the vehicle brings. However, @Boomer243 (The Seller) also appreciates the community's feedback and continuous education about the car, making it clear that they value all input regarding the vehicle's authenticity and desirability.
Neutral: Neutral comments mostly revolve around clarifications of the vehicle's status and historical accuracy. @Lovered123 and @AlPalmer10 discuss the car's legitimacy as a replica and acknowledge the mixed opinions presented in the comments. @MS3DALE provides detailed information about the build codes, emphasizing that the vehicle is an authentic pace car edition, contributing to the conversation about its authenticity. @Boomer243 (The Seller) tries to address various questions and concerns, confirming that they are open to discussions about the car's discrepancies while asserting the vehicle's provenance based on build information from GM.
Negative: On the negative side, there are several criticisms and doubts regarding the car's authenticity. @Smkymts is particularly vocal, claiming that the vehicle is not a genuine Indy 500 Pace Car and pointing out various discrepancies such as incorrect headrests and labels. They highlight the lack of official documentation to support the claims of authenticity. Other comments also question the accuracy of the reproduction window sticker and the modifications made to the vehicle, with @DSultan and @MS3DALE addressing concerns but with differing perspectives on authenticity. Overall, there is a significant divide among commenters regarding the vehicle's authenticity and the validity of its claims.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong appreciation for the bike's performance and engineering. @99cyclone praises the bike as gorgeous and fun, while @P0rsche956 calls it an exceptional piece that delivers impressive power. Commenters like @FastTimes212 and @konarider94 highlight the innovative technology and raw riding experience, suggesting that the motorcycle is a unique blend of power and craftsmanship that's hard to replicate. There is a general excitement about the bike's potential and a notion that it stands out in comparison to newer models.
Neutral: Several comments provide straightforward inquiries and responses about the auction process and shipping options. @igoldin (The Seller) facilitates communication by inviting questions and confirming shipping arrangements for interested buyers. @JohnNat1971's question regarding shipping hints at practical considerations for potential bidders, while @lokilow raises a technical question regarding the bike's mechanical condition, indicative of the importance of maintenance in these types of bikes.
Negative: However, there are concerns regarding the bike's reliability, particularly mentioned by @lokilow, who references the potential risk of engine damage due to a known issue with crank nuts. The mention of this issue introduces a note of caution for potential buyers, suggesting that while the bike may be powerful and well-designed, it also requires attentive maintenance to prevent mechanical failures. Overall, while the comments express enthusiasm, they are tempered by a reminder of the bike's mechanical vulnerabilities.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters noted the vehicle's pristine condition and clean interior, highlighting its stunning build and craftsmanship. @boaboyoz referred to the C10 as "gray groovyness," further expressing appreciation for its quality. Furthermore, @Grambo shared a personal endorsement, mentioning that the owner is trustworthy and that the truck is as described, promising satisfaction for the new owner. @WITB (The Seller) emphasized the truck's exceptional quality, stating it is pristine and showing commitment to transparency about minor cosmetic flaws.
Neutral: Several users sought additional information regarding the vehicle's specifications and features. @53COE inquired about the bed mat and its source, receiving clarification from @bbcarguys regarding where to purchase it. Additionally, @Dale_I asked for details about the rear gear ratio and requested a cold start video, showing interest in the truck's performance. These exchanges suggest that potential buyers are carefully evaluating the vehicle while also interacting positively with the seller, creating a constructive dialogue.
Negative: Despite the overall positive sentiment, some comments pointed out potential concerns. @raingram70 noted that while the C10 has decent modifications, it may not have enough updates to feel modern. @Oldschool16 brought up the drum brakes, which could be perceived as a drawback considering contemporary braking systems. Moreover, @The_Badge asked questions about any rust and the originality of the short bed, reflecting a cautious approach from potential buyers who want to ensure they are making a sound investment in the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @SHIFTAUTOMOTIVE (The Seller) highlights that the car is a nice example of a 2014 model, cherished for its original NB2 variant and attractive factory color. They offer personalized services such as tire replacement at cost and free installation, ensuring potential buyers have options for new tires. Commenter @MagML acknowledges the car's appeal and looks forward to more content, like driving videos, and appreciates the seller's prompt communication about details and services.
Neutral: There are ongoing discussions about the car’s maintenance history, with @MagML raising a concern over apparent neglect since the last documented service was two decades ago. The seller admits that maintenance records may be hard to trace due to past ownership but assures that they will provide driving videos soon and emphasizes that the tires are left in their current state for the buyer's preferences. The seller also clarifies local regulations regarding the required front license plate setup, alleviating concerns about potential drilling.
Negative: Commenters, like @Buckedup, express concerns about the condition of the tires, and the absence of ABS, which they wish was included. @eknightBAT criticizes the presence of advertising stickers, showing displeasure with the aesthetics, while @MagML further pushes for better visibility and detailed photos of the tires. Overall, some participants remain skeptical about the car's documentation and previous maintenance practices, hinting that this might affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @iakllc, has demonstrated a proactive approach in communicating about the vehicle's condition and potential repairs. They have confirmed that the sunroof drains have been cleaned and are prepared to assist in scheduling an inspection at the local dealer for prospective buyers. Additionally, they provided information about the vehicle, emphasizing its strong service history, zero leaks, and no issues in common areas typically found in Land Rovers, contributing to a positive overall impression of the vehicle's maintenance.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around the current recall situation concerning the front knuckle issue, with @MrGinNYC and @Typhoontaz discussing the need for inspections and the dealership's obligations. @Typhoontaz aptly noted that dealerships should provide free inspections to verify the condition of the knuckles, while @iakllc clarified that no parts are available at this time. @hbl21 inquired about any visible damage from a previous accident, and @iakllc responded with details from Carfax regarding minor cosmetic issues, maintaining an informative and neutral tone throughout.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's issues and dealership practices. @Typhoontaz voiced frustration about dealerships potentially dismissing vehicle owners when parts are unavailable, highlighting a negative aspect of the customer service experience. @hbl21's inquiry about visible damage suggests skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition, and overall, there is an undercurrent of distrust about the handling of recalls and inspections, indicating that prospective buyers may have reservations before proceeding.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express a strong appreciation for the vehicle's classic style and nostalgic value. @shadman10 exclaims excitement over the bike, calling it a 'Samurai Sword'. @Tom_S. notes its coolness and wishes the seller well on their first BaT listing. @Slinkert describes it as a 'very clean example' with desirable factory components. Others, like @wxflyer, eagerly anticipate its appearance on the market, underlining the bike's significance as a unique and sought-after model. Overall, the vehicle is celebrated for its historical impact and aesthetics.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification on specific features and components of the bike. @A50 asks for details about the term 'reassembled', while @Cski inquires about the availability of the stock exhaust. The seller, @trentbatey, responds positively to these inquiries, stating the factory exhaust is included, although it is missing some hardware. The conversation also covers the bike's performance and condition, with @PittsS1S probing for details about the bike's shifting and any potential issues, which @trentbatey assures are non-existent, confirming that the bike is in good mechanical shape.
Negative: Some concerns are raised about the bike's condition. @holdencx requests photos of the tank's interior to assess the rust situation, which @trentbatey addresses by mentioning there is light rust present but it does not require immediate attention. This indicates some hesitation on the part of potential buyers regarding the vehicle's upkeep. Additionally, @trentbatey points out several parts are missing, raising questions about the bike's completeness as a classic motorcycle. Overall, while there is enthusiasm, there is also a cautious approach to the vehicle's condition and parts availability.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters like @Jencena expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, calling it a "Beautiful build!" Others, such as @rmoore72601, acknowledged the car's appealing appearance with remarks like "Good looking Daytona." Similarly, @Toad_Dr (The Seller) provided additional insights into the construction timeline, noting that the car was purchased in 2008 and completed with paint and licensing in mid-2020. This backstory contributes to the positive perception of the car as a well-built option.
Neutral: Some inquiries revolved around features of the vehicle, with @Jkramer14 asking about specific hoses visible in pictures and their purposes. There was also a discussion about the inclusion of the Plexiglass side windows, as inquires from @Arnage and @puntagorda sought clarification on whether these parts were a part of the build. @Toad_Dr also confirmed the presence of the windows, although he noted that they were not installed due to the car's usage in California and anticipated conditions in Idaho. The dialogue indicates a balanced interest among users regarding the vehicle's specifications and components.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about certain features, notably @rmoore72601 questioning the practicality of air conditioning in a car without windows, especially in humid climates. Moreover, @Sparky5858 emphasized the need for a driving video to justify the car's price, highlighting a potential skepticism among commenters who did not have direct access to the vehicle. Additionally, @defilade and @George4343 showed confusion regarding the model designation, further adding to the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's details.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's potential as a rewarding project. @Mayjer points out the benefits of the twin HIF carbs which improve horsepower compared to the original single carb setup. @ekstorey sees it as a viable daily driver, valuing its running condition and the overall bargain it presents. @Capt._Doug emphasizes the car's strong club support, labeling it a perfect starter project for younger enthusiasts, fostering skills and connections in the car community. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) reinforces the car's drivability and encourages engagement from potential buyers, anticipating a positive outcome for whoever decides to take it on.
Neutral: Several comments mention the car's overall condition and necessary repairs with a tempered enthusiasm. @pragmatic recognizes the need for examination of certain rust spots while still viewing it as a solid starting point for young drivers needing a transportation solution. @sludgo finds it more attractive than his previous project car, noting its decent state. @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) acknowledges the car's capability to be made roadworthy with minimal effort, while @dtl2000 provides historical context about the MGB's changes over the years, confirming the auction's no-reserve nature and the highlights of the model in question.
Negative: Comments also reflect some of the vehicle's shortcomings. @Aridgerunner inquires about the compression numbers, which @MichaelsMotorCarsPA (The Seller) later provides as relatively consistent, suggesting reasonable engine health. @Virginiatransplant notes that the speedometer is not functioning, raising concerns about the car's reliability. @BilliesDadhadaMGB nostalgically recalls past experiences with an MGB, hinting at the challenges that come with owning older vehicles, while emphasizing the car’s potential for fun. Overall, the feedback suggests while there are a few issues to be addressed, many still consider it a worthwhile project.
|
 |
Positive: @gscharnagl commented on the vehicle's impressive aesthetics, referring to it as a "beast" and praising the unique color combination of light interior against the common black. This sentiment reflects a general appreciation for the car's appeal among viewers.
Neutral: @jlk1224 inquired about the service records, showing interest in the maintenance history of the vehicle. @AB2112 asked about the current condition of the brakes, indicating a desire for clarity on the vehicle's performance and safety aspects. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) responded promptly to both inquiries, highlighting the car's excellent condition with recent maintenance done, including new tires and ignition coils, and offering reassurance about the vehicle's readiness for sale.
Negative: There were no negative comments noted in the provided exchanges. All responses from potential buyers and the seller focused on the car's condition and logistics, suggesting a generally positive perception of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered enthusiastic responses from various commenters who appreciate its overall appeal and driving potential. @Thetatebaumercollection expressed excitement over the car's quality, praising it as an 'awesome car, done right.' Additionally, @CarCrzyTom highlighted the enjoyment of driving it, noting the great color combination and the fun of shifting through the gears. Another comment from @RumbleAuto supports this positive sentiment, referring to the car as a great example for enthusiasts, further indicating its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed views that are neither strictly positive nor negative, acknowledging the car's mixed history. @PcarB mentioned to @bigone that despite the vehicle's past accidents, it still represents a cool specification for an affordable driving experience. Others like @Miles_S (The Seller) noted that the car is not a 'garage queen,' appealing to those who want to drive and enjoy a willing vehicle rather than a pristine showcase piece. Commenters like @Noahyjohn also expressed anticipation for a driving video, suggesting that the right footage could positively influence bidding behavior.
Negative: On the more critical side, some comments shed light on concerns regarding the vehicle's accident history and current valuation. @EJoos pointed out that the car endured two accidents, while @Bigone raised several questions about its maintenance and modifications, hinting at potential issues with paint and wear. Furthermore, @eurocol conveyed skepticism about the vehicle's condition, mentioning missing panels and overall aesthetic discrepancies, reinforcing a perception that the car might not fulfill some buyers' expectations for a Ferrari.
|
 |
Positive: @daviduccio shared their positive experience with the vehicle, describing it as an "iron fist in a velvet glove" and expressing a desire to keep it after a week of using it as a loaner. @pre445 has owned one for 11 years and appreciates the car's performance, indicating satisfaction with its longevity. @anfieldsmd, the seller, received praise for the detailed driving description and acknowledged the vehicle’s strong points along with confirming operation of windows and doors, contributing to confidence in the car's quality.
Neutral: @leightoncutler sought clarification about a mention of a distributor cap in the vehicle's description, while @bringatrailer appreciated the updates based on feedback from @pre445 and @leightoncutler regarding maintenance details in the listing. @anfieldsmd addressed @Mr_White's inquiry about service records by stating that the vehicle had no documented oil changes before 30,000 miles and offered to share the auto check report received during the purchase, providing transparency to potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding maintenance history, as @Mr_White questioned the lack of service records for oil changes before 30,000 miles. @anfieldsmd elaborated on their limitations in automotive knowledge, stating they struggled with maintenance beyond routine care despite performing yearly tasks, indicating hesitance in managing older car upkeep. Additionally, @Kirkyboy inquired about oil consumption between changes, hinting at potential worries about the vehicle's oil usage.
|
 |
Positive: @JWebbTexas raves about the vehicle, describing it as a dream with regular maintenance being affordable. They express enthusiasm for this particular model, stating it looks nice and clean. @Route5motorcarsinc, the seller, reassures potential buyers that the vehicle is in great condition with no shifting issues and highlights that it has a clean Carfax record, emphasizing its longevity and enjoyment potential.
Neutral: @rustyray and @JohnKach comment on the vehicle's condition, noting some rust underneath, which they attribute to road salt exposure, especially given its age and origin from the Northeast. @chaschigas raises several questions regarding the gas tank replacements and the extent of the undercarriage corrosion, seeking clarification on service records and the seller's previous statements about light corrosion and 'some scales underneath'. The seller attempts to address these concerns, inviting further inquiry.
Negative: @Wellseasonedchef expresses concern regarding the Carfax report, suggesting it presents some uncertainties about the vehicle's history. @chaschigas is particularly critical, questioning the reasons behind the gas tank replacements and corrosion extent, labeling them as points of concern that need detailed explanations. They remark on the seller's continuous assurances of no worries being somewhat dismissive of valid concerns, adding to the skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition.
|
Stryker Rally Experience w/Cole Powelson at Block Family Ranch for 43 Institute
Lot 236275
Private Party
 |
Positive: @43Institute (The Seller) expresses gratitude to Cole Powelson and Stryker for providing an exclusive experience through 43i. They highlight the significance of gaining access to the Block family's private track in Kamas, which is not open to the public. Additionally, they commend the initiative as all proceeds support the mission of 43 Institute, aiming to create opportunities for the next generation.
Neutral: @GBRBiLL shares practical information regarding the vehicle's 4WD capabilities and the logistics of accessing Kamas by flying into SLC airport, underscoring that it’s a convenient location with lodging available in nearby Heber. However, they express disappointment at not being able to participate in bidding due to their financial situation.
Negative: @ShineOn conveys a sense of desperation with a dramatic comment about being unable to breathe, which could indicate overwhelming excitement or anxiety about the experience related to the vehicle. However, this comment doesn’t provide substantial feedback on the vehicle itself.
|
 |
Positive: @CollectorClassics (The Seller) highlights the exceptional condition of this first generation Escalade, noting it is a one owner vehicle that is super clean inside and out. Additionally, the vehicle runs and drives smoothly, with recent maintenance including a replaced AC compressor and brand new tires. The inclusion of a functional VHS player is a nostalgic touch that could appeal to families looking for entertainment options for road trips.
Neutral: @Sparrownaut reflects on the original market perception of the first generation Escalade, expressing that he expected the vehicle to falter given its similarity to the Chevy Tahoe. While he acknowledges that this particular unit is nicely preserved, he conveys a sense of ambivalence about the vehicle's overall concept. @ericisrael42 inquires about the engine type, showing interest but without negative intentions, while @CollectorClassics (The Seller) responds with specifics about the injection system.
Negative: @WIZZZZ raises a concern regarding the vehicle's service history, pointing out that the Carfax report shows no prior oil change documentation, which could lead potential buyers to question the vehicle's maintenance records. This lack of verifiable service history may affect buyer confidence. Overall, while the Escalade has its strengths, the questions about maintenance could deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been positively described for its reliability and comfortable features. @mein_auto shared a personal experience of a lengthy road trip in a similar model, highlighting its dependable nature and comfort even over long distances, with an average of 20 mpg. @Davidboco praised the overall build quality and noted that the van is likely to go for an affordable price, while @Wandering_Lens remarked on its well-maintained condition if the service records are followed. The seller, @MCEcars, provided specifics about the solar setup and power options, which impressed potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the practical aspects and specifications of the vehicle. @Surfpow and @Larsmeister32 asked for details about the mattress dimensions and interior height, indicating a need for further clarification around comfort and usability. Other users inquired about technical specifics like the solar panel wattage and the existence of external utility hookups, demonstrating a balanced interest in both features and functionality. @MCEcars responded to these queries with helpful information, which suggests the seller is engaged and ready to provide potential bids with the details they need.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's features, particularly related to comfort. @Larsmeister32 criticized the front seats, describing them as uncomfortable and worn, and @cjmarka made a humorous comment implying discomfort in using the restroom facilities during travel, further emphasizing the lack of a toilet in the RV. Additionally, the issue with the reported damage history in 2016 brought up by @Wandering_Lens left some buyers wondering about the vehicle's past reliability, although @MCEcars stated no visible damage is noted. Overall, there appeared to be some skepticism about various aspects related to comfort and history.
|
Customized & Supercharged “Steel Sled” 1993 Buick Roadmaster Estate Wagon
1G4BR8373PW400532
Lot 236264
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentors like @70_duster, @cordes, and @k24a2_locost express admiration for the vehicle, calling it an 'awesome time capsule' and a 'cool throwback' to the 90s. @RMQ333 appreciates the nostalgic design and believes the car is perfectly suited for a 90's car show. Several users, including @WTX_HotRodder and @Charliedents, fondly recall the era when the vehicle was popular, reminiscing about events like the Hot Rod Super Nationals and the mini truck craze.
Neutral: @Bmw_autohouse (The Seller) provides clarifications regarding the car's features, stating that they do not have power output numbers and explaining the functionality of the airbags. @DW6000 raises questions about potential modifications to the factory structure of the car, and the seller addresses these concerns by confirming that modifications were minimal. @Scott_S and other commenters note the wheels and design elements without expressing strong emotions, contributing to a more neutral perspective on the vehicle's aesthetics and condition.
Negative: Comments from @WTX_HotRodder mention that while the vehicle has a beautiful design reflecting the early 90s, time has taken a toll on its condition, stating it is not 'Show Quality' anymore. @RMQ333 humorously critiques the unconventional air intake, suggesting it could have been better executed. Additionally, @CorvairGA's inquiry about the functional airbags highlights a concern regarding safety features, while @DW6000's comments about the removal of structural elements of the car point to perceived shortcomings of the vehicle's modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @Der_Chiefen, the seller, shares his heartfelt appreciation for the wonderful ownership experience he has had with the 2016 Camaro 2SS convertible over the past 49 months and under 24K miles. He highlights its impressive performance, luxurious features, and the joy of top-down driving. He expresses confidence that this beloved vehicle will find a new home among automotive enthusiasts, particularly within the BaT community. He has invested effort and care into maintaining the vehicle, including meticulous treatment of the convertible top, promising to share products used for its upkeep with the new owner to ensure continued care.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, @Der_Chiefen provides detailed insights into the car's features, maintenance history, and personal anecdotes that have shaped its condition. He discusses the convertible top mechanics, a DIY modification for the cargo shade, and care routines. The seller emphasizes that he has kept up with regular service, including oil changes and recalls. Additionally, he addresses misconceptions regarding previous ownership listed on Carfax, clarifying the circumstances of ownership that resulted in three entries, while assuring that he is only the second actual owner.
Negative: However, @Der_Chiefen is candid about some imperfections on the vehicle, noting exterior blemishes and minor faults. He describes various scratches, small rock chips, and imperfections in the clearcoat that have developed over time, acknowledging that they may be hard to notice unless pointed out. While he maintains that the interior is in excellent condition, he does mention a minor wear spot on the driver's seat bolster, underscoring his commitment to transparency in presenting the car's condition to potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @DRIVEGOLFSKI expressed admiration for the vehicle's cleanliness and beauty, noting its great value. @Rodeo_King shared his positive experience with previous Ferrari models, labeling this offering as fantastic. @alfriedesq appreciates the car's design, complimenting its color, and @GDogg described it as simply stunning. Others, like @Toptime79, recognized the unique appeal of a Ferrari that has been driven and enjoyed rather than stored away, praising the current owner for prioritizing the driving experience.
Neutral: @barrettautogroup (The Seller) introduced the 2013 Ferrari California 30 Handling Speciale, highlighting its specifications, including the Handling Speciale package which enhances driving dynamics. The current mileage and ownership history were shared, indicating regular use while maintaining a clean title despite past incidents that were disclosed. Several commenters, such as @59gene, requested more details like service records and videos to better understand the vehicle's condition, which the seller was willing to provide.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Majorohio regarding the vehicle's history, including whether it had a salvage title, to which @barrettautogroup clarified it did not. @Gretsch56 questioned the cause of a rattle heard in the driving video, and other users like @OrmondStar and @RallyCross sought clarification on the vehicle's specifications and repair history, suggesting potential confusion about its value and condition. @kcwvu noted inconsistencies in the condition of the HVAC controls and other switchgear, hinting at potential restoration issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Scliffe appreciates the vehicle's unique wire wheel design, describing it as a totally different look that stands out. @MoPar4TheCourse also praises the attractive tire/wheel combination, noting the specific tire size as 17" Federal 595. @jsmithba expresses enjoyment for the wire spokes on the roadster, indicating a surprising fondness for them despite usually disliking this feature on other models, such as the XJS.
Neutral: @thebarnmiami, the seller, provides a thorough introduction about the 1997 Jaguar XK8, including tips for the auction process and encouraging bidder interaction. They assure potential buyers that they are open to direct communication and are committed to ensuring a smooth auction experience. The seller also addresses service history concerns, stating that records are lost but that they are willing to assist with inspections and additional photos as needed.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history have been raised, particularly by @CoachYoc and @ch3m, regarding the timing chain and water pump components. @vmaxie22 queries the lack of service history on the provided carfax and requests clarification on other specifics, such as the front shock mount bushings. @Pitrone highlights uncertainty about whether crucial components like the plastic timing chain have been replaced, reflecting apprehension regarding the vehicle's overall reliability.
|
|
|
Positive: The comments regarding the vehicle highlight its excellent condition and impressive aesthetics. @etbrace (The Seller) notes that the Porsche 911 stands out due to its beautiful paint job and clean interior. @ED praises the stunning look of the car, particularly the interior, and agrees with the sentiment that the IMS bearing in the 1999 model is very robust. @Juchle compliments the car's appearance and detailing, reinforcing that it presents beautifully in photos. Overall, prospective buyers appear to be encouraged by the vehicle's physical condition and mechanical reliability.
Neutral: Some comments reflect inquiries and confirmation regarding the vehicle's specifics and maintenance history. @Juchle raises important questions about the state of the vehicle, such as the presence of leaks, functionality of controls and instruments, and the tire condition. @Tomer asks about the original radio unit and the production date, while @amtyrthd seeks additional information about potential modifications and emissions compliance. @sharkie104 adds a note about the tires, indicating they may be damaged, suggesting caution without a strong negative flair, as it was a factual note about their status.
Negative: There are concerns raised among commentors regarding the tires and the lack of comprehensive service records. @sharkie104 insists that the tires are dry rotted and should only be driven to a tire shop, indicating potential immediate maintenance issues. Furthermore, @bradleyt09 raises a specific concern about whether the IMS bearing can be replaced at an additional cost before pickup, hinting at uncertainty under the vehicle's current state. Additionally, @Juchle’s questions about leaks and operational functionality suggest that not all potential buyers are fully assured of the car's mechanical integrity, which raises some flags regarding overall confidence in the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the bike's appearance and performance, appreciating its professional paint job and extensive list of modifications, which includes high-end components such as titanium hardware and racing parts. @Mitziebikes mentioned a good cold start, complimenting the way the bike was handled during startup and calling it a "beautiful Grom". @Best_Of_Show (The Seller) expressed gratitude for the positive bids and comments, describing the bike as incredible and akin to a "little monster". @Hondaboy164456, who has experience building Groms, highlighted its value by stating that replicating it would cost over $8,000.
Neutral: Discussion about the bike features included inquiries about its horsepower and the possibility of including the license plate with the sale for a California buyer. @Zookr1000 asked about the current horsepower, while @Meccanica sought clarification on whether the bike's plate would accompany the purchase, to which @Best_Of_Show (The Seller) confirmed that it would, despite the frame not being included. Various commenters shared their thoughts on the bike already, with additional discussions about parts and labor costs associated with similar builds and how the bike has been a topic of interest among potential buyers.
Negative: There were no explicitly negative comments regarding the bike; however, some users hinted at the complexities involved in replicating the build or the emotional aspect of selling something so well-crafted. @Abernathy01 expressed that if they were not already committed to a different bike, they would be tempted by this one—which indirectly speaks to the competition among available options. @Best_Of_Show (The Seller) also reflected on their emotions about selling the bike, mentioning they regret putting it up for sale, which indicates a connection to the motorcycle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle's innovative design and craftsmanship. @BubbaGPZ1100 praised the build as 'SUPER innovative' while @TommyBruin called it a 'very nice crockpot build' that mixes various elements into an excellent result. @roygoodwin, despite being a stock Studebaker fan, described the vehicle as an 'awesome build.' @MitchHungLynch expressed admiration for the vehicle, stating it showcases a strong pride of ownership and referred to it as a 'wonderful build' and 'smokin’ and rockin’ Stude.'
Neutral: Several comments sought additional information about the vehicle, including questions about the grille's origin. @gspies inquired about the specific year of the grille and @Subsea69 provided insights suggesting it might be from 1954 or 1955. @CigarsThomas asked for a cold start video, which was later provided by @GRAMPS59, who also informed potential bidders about the engine mileage and maintenance history, revealing the engine has 50K miles and the transmission has 25K miles, as well as details on recent maintenance.
Negative: A couple of concerns were raised regarding the vehicle. @MitchHungLynch posed questions about the absence of a driving video and suggested that, given the vehicle’s high quality, something could be added to the floor for enhancement. Overall, while no outright negative comments were made, these inquiries point to areas that potential buyers might find lacking, reflecting a desire for more comprehensive presentation of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Templar50401 expressed excitement about the vehicle, labeling it an awesome car with reference to the A990 model. @MikeDTaz praised the vehicle as one of the nicest tribute cars he has seen, suggesting that it should be driven boldly and calling it plain cool while enthusiastically supporting Mopar. @BubbaGPZ1100 and @440belvedere also shared high praise, indicating their admiration and enjoyment, with @BubbaGPZ1100 stating that he had nothing but superlatives to offer. Furthermore, @WillardJeeves remarked humorously on the transformation of the car from its humble beginnings to a powerful beast and @RedRider48 acknowledged the car's history as a real street warrior.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries and requests for additional information from the seller about the vehicle's specifications and history. @DAB72 requested details regarding the engine build, such as cam specifications and rear-end gears, while @StrayDart asked about camshaft types, gear ratios, and fuel types. The seller, @Tiffinautomart, responded to a query, providing specifics including the compression ratio and gear ratio, which suggest transparency regarding the vehicle's capabilities. Others, like @Kawi-crazy and @Tony63Bee, contributed insights about the VIN plate and historical context about where VIN tags were placed, indicating a collective interest in the car's authenticity.
Negative: Some comments showed a lack of concern for the car's original components, such as @craigfen's remark indicating that no one would miss the original slant 6 engine. @RiffRaff made a lighthearted jab at the slant-six's fate, suggesting it's not in the best condition anymore. Additionally, commentors like @StrayDart, while seeking clarification, suggested there might be confusion about certain components like the carburetor setup. Other comments hinted at skepticism or a desire for clarification about features like the seats, as noted by @deucehotrod.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express appreciation for the vehicle's characteristics, praising its overall performance and design. @blucille describes it as a bulletproof, fast, comfortable, and refined daily driver. @punternomore commends @pinetar for choosing this exceptional car after his injury, noting that it reflects a positive attitude and resilience. Additionally, @choochootrain calls it a fantastic car, indicating a strong support for the model's appeal. Confirmation of @pinetar's transparent communication about the car's condition further reinforces the positive sentiment among potential buyers.
Neutral: @pinetar, the seller, provides detailed information about his Volvo V60 R-Design, including the car's accessibility modifications, which are necessary due to his paraplegic status. He mentions the scuffs in the interior due to the frequent loading and unloading of his wheelchair, emphasizing the importance of full disclosure regarding its condition. Comments from @Smooch48 and @xr7s427 acknowledge this detail, indicating that these imperfections are acceptable and typical for a vehicle used in such a manner.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's maintenance arise, particularly regarding the timing belt and potential issues with the car's past service history. @tgr2410 notes hesitance about a long drive with the timing belt nearing 10 years old, despite it being below the mileage threshold suggested by Volvo. Additionally, some commenters have expressed anxiety about the lack of information on the timing belt's condition and the potential challenges in inspecting it, which @pinetar admits he has not had reason to do. The absence of definitive timing belt documentation raises a cautionary note among interested buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the luxury and elegance of the Bentley Mulsanne, praising its smooth performance, comfort, and overall aesthetics. @Dollycat3 calls it "absolutely beautiful and elegant" while @DB6 highlights that the promotional video features people who are knowledgeable and passionate about caring for luxury vehicles. @Lambchop shares a fond memory of owning a Bentley, stating they miss the profound luxury of the car, which emphasizes the brand's reputation for power and sophistication.
Neutral: Several comments reflect concerns and inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance history and current condition. @ottocarclub, the seller, provides assurances about the car being a well-kept example and offers post-sale assistance. However, other commenters, like @ChuckH and @430NYC, raise questions regarding the car's service history, past ownership, and necessary repairs, indicating a mixture of curiosity and caution regarding potential issues without definitive answers.
Negative: On a more critical note, some commenters express skepticism about the vehicle's overall value and condition. @430NYC points out the lack of service records and suggests the car's value may be lower than expected. @Georgeamoth mentions ongoing minor service needs and the high costs associated with owning an older luxury vehicle. Additionally, @Flomoaz and @ChuckH inquire about past recommendations for repairs that haven't been addressed, raising concerns about the seller's transparency regarding maintenance issues.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 1948 MG TC, particularly highlighting its classic British sports car styling. @Aaron and @RiffRaff both complimented the car's beauty and upkeep, stating it was a lovely example and perfect colors. Many commenters, like @MNberg, enthusiastically discussed the significance of the TC in sports car history and how its design has stood the test of time, noting the car’s capability and charm. @ClassicPromenade emphasized the quality restoration and appeal of the vehicle, with community praise for the documented restoration work, which was noted as extensive and meticulous.
Neutral: Several comments raised inquiries about specific details regarding the vehicle's components and modifications. @Tocatta questioned the steering box, while @DoctorMark sought clarification on the engine rebuild and documentation related to it. @BB510 and @Dirtrack49 also asked about the paint condition and original parts, indicating a healthy interest in ensuring the car's authenticity and condition. @Some_Guy mentioned the advantages and disadvantages of the modifications, such as the VW steering box, citing the trade-offs between originality and practicality in modern driving contexts.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding modifications and the condition of certain features on the car. @toward expressed skepticism about the original engine block and pointed out the lack of factory original colors, suggesting that the restoration might not have entirely adhered to classic specifications. @Dirtrack49 requested close-up shots of paint imperfections and condition of the driver's seat, hinting at concerns about wear and potential restoration oversights. Lastly, remarks from @MGB6 regarding the placement of steering components indicated that some features might impede comfort, prompting further analysis from the community.
|
 |
Positive: @thanny72 (The Seller) shares that the vehicle, a Blazer, underwent a full restoration when it reached 171,000 miles, so it currently stands at approximately 172,000 miles. The seller expresses excitement about the vehicle and provides an invitation for potential buyers to ask any questions regarding the Blazer. Additionally, @thanny72 highlights the unique dimmable color shift interior and exterior lighting, mentioning that there are multiple settings, including some that change with music, showcasing the vehicle's modern features.
Neutral: In response to a query, @thanny72 elaborates on the reason for selling the Blazer, indicating that the family has decided to pass on to the next adventure with a different vehicle, specifically a '77 Trans Am inherited from his wife's grandfather, which holds more sentimental value. This indicates a personal attachment and shifting priorities rather than dissatisfaction with the Blazer itself. The seller also informs potential buyers that videos demonstrating the Blazer's features will be posted soon, helping to provide more insights into the vehicle.
Negative: @Blackta79 comments jokingly about the vehicle, expressing a desire to kick the speaker, suggesting a lighthearted concern about the quality or placement of the speakers. @thanny72 responds in agreement with humor, mentioning that the speakers are protected by a cage, inferring a level of concern that might come with a vehicle that is targeted for fun or rugged use. This exchange, while playful, hints at some potential issues or perceptions about the durability of certain features of the Blazer.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1937 Rudge Special, noting its unique features and quality engineering. @Mouse51 referred to the exhaust extensions as the wildest ever made, while @GLHatWFO mentioned the appealing fishtail pipes and overall presentation of the bike. @Crazy_Canadian shared memories of seeing a similar model at a bike show and described it as a beautiful bike. Further compliments came from @RiffRaff, who called it a beautiful example, and @JockAbroad, who stated he had seen the bike in person and found it fantastic. The comments also highlighted the bike's connection to the late Rob North, regarded as a master craftsman, and appreciated the thorough restoration work done on the bike.
Neutral: Various comments provided historical context and personal anecdotes related to the Rudge brand and its significance. @C.Flint shared memories of visiting Rob's workshop and noted the high-quality engineering of the bike, while @J-525 elaborated on the advanced features of Rudge's four-valve racing bikes and their contributions during World War II. Some commenters, including @Lewis, discussed cultural references to the Rudge, indicating its place in motorcycle history and popular culture. The Seller, @kpelowitz, engaged with the community by providing additional information on Rob North's work and the bike's features, including updates on the bike's functionality, which generated interest among potential bidders.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the bike's mechanical reliability that surfaced in the comments. @Stevohd and @overtime111 inquired about the functionality of the lights and charging system, expressing doubts about the bike after it had been in static display for some time. @overtime111 pointed out that the gears and clutch were reported to have worked under Rob North's ownership but raised questions about their current condition. @kpelowitz, the seller, acknowledged these inquiries and mentioned that the bike had not been started for a while and needed a battery replacement to assess its systems properly. This raised uncertainties about the bike's overall reliability and readiness for riding.
|
 |
Positive: @Jeepmike described the vehicle as a piece of automotive art, emphasizing its proper usage and enjoyment. @mohawk2003 praised its beauty and highlighted the lack of available window stickers through CarFax, noting the vehicle's exclusive features and optional packages that enhance its appeal. @anthonyjp appreciated the tire choice on the car, suggesting a positive reception of the modifications and performance aspects.
Neutral: @Jakesna inquired about the vehicle's suspension height, while others like @Jrv203 and @Cags455 asked technical questions about the aftermarket ECU and emissions inspection. Commenters also discussed tire specifications and choices, indicating an interest in optimizing the vehicle's performance and appearance rather than outright criticism. @leadinghamj (The Seller) confirmed the presence of a unique aftermarket ECU and outlined the vehicle's additional features, maintaining a neutral stance in response to inquiries.
Negative: @Dodge_guy commented that the car, although beautiful, might require detailing, indicating it may not be in pristine condition. @redtanrt10 raised concerns about emissions compliance, especially in states like California, noting that the vehicle may not pass smog checks due to its modifications. @Cags455 further noted the potential gamble regarding emissions inspections in their area, expressing skepticism about the vehicle's readiness for such checks.
|
 |
Positive: @memphisto expressed excitement about the auction launch and appreciated early bids. The seller highlighted their intention to be transparent about the vehicle's condition, having experienced issues with past purchases. Additional information and photos were provided, including details about key fobs, the radio, and a windshield chip, ensuring potential bidders have all necessary information to make informed decisions.
Neutral: Concerns were raised by @Lanoka regarding previous rust issues, to which @memphisto admitted the presence of corrosion on the underside fasteners but indicated no immediate rust treatment had been performed since his purchase. @LehrJet noted an apparent leak in the exhaust video, and the seller suggested it could be condensation. The vehicle remains in storage, with plans for further investigation and additional photos of the exhaust issued to provide clarity.
Negative: Criticism arose regarding the vehicle's existing issues, such as the noted corrosion and questions about the exhaust leak without a clear answer from @memphisto. The seller informed that the HVAC had undergone repairs but was still losing cooling strength, leading to potential concerns about ongoing functionality. Furthermore, @B613P felt the need to retract their bid after reassessing the situation, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Calamari_Jujutsu expresses excitement for the upcoming experience and wishes good luck to the participants. @Thetatebaumercollection shares a positive personal connection with @Vaughn Gitten Jr., highlighting his friendliness and suggesting that the experience will be rewarding for the winner. @1porsche_geek recalls a memorable experience at the 43 Institute and encourages well wishes to the prospective winner, indicating that the event promises to be enjoyable., @Bike_Acc_Guy reflects on a thrilling ride he had with Vaughn during the Raptor Rally, praising Vaughn's impressive skills and describing the experience as amazing, while @boaboyoz reinforces the fun aspect of the event while applauding the cause supported by 43 Institute.
Neutral: @43Institute (The Seller) provides context about the event, emphasizing their gratitude for Vaughn and the RTR team's contribution to making this experience possible. They highlight the world-class nature of what is being built in Concord and clarify that proceeds from the event will further the mission of providing opportunities for the next generation. The Seller also invites attendees to check out the full offering of unique experiences available through 4/3 Day.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @autoplus615 (The Seller) claims the 2019 Miata Club RF is in amazing condition, stating it has been well-maintained and is a rare find. Commentors like @Apercu and @Mick205 appreciate the car's aesthetics and performance, expressing that it is quick and fun to drive. @Andydexterous highlights it as "the biggest bang for the buck" and @kaehlin considers it a reasonable deal despite a minor accident history. Overall, there is a consensus that the car not only looks nice but offers an enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: Several users engage with the seller asking about details on service history and maintenance. @Chartigan inquires about additional maintenance records, while @VistaJim and @88C32G focus on the transmission and clutch operation, questioning if any previous issues have been documented. @tmchug01 is curious whether the title will indicate actual mileage, and @Schteph asks about the title ownership. The seller responds to these inquiries with clarifications, emphasizing that the car has undergone inspections and is in great shape.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the car's servicing history and minor accident report. @VistaJim expresses uncertainty about the transmission, owing to past issues with certain model years, while @88C32G mentions the typical need for servicing the clutch and transmission at higher mileages. @jam2u notes potential wear on the steering wheel, asking for additional photos to verify its condition. These comments suggest some skepticism about the car's overall maintenance due to the lack of extensive records.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's aesthetic and modifications. @70_duster admires the Alpina wheels, while @DJMAR677 expresses similar love for the car. @propellerhead-tom describes it as a great-looking coupe with appealing modifications, emphasizing its quality as a driver’s car. Commenters like @BubRudy and @Mark_Plum appreciate the classic design and the vehicle's rich history, individually noting its beauty and iconic status.
Neutral: Several users raise inquiries about the car's features and condition without strong bias. @Arandomcarguy questions the possibility of removing the lip and spoiler, while @SactoKeith asks about registration requirements in California. @Malibubimmer critiques the choice of black grilles over chrome, suggesting a preference for original parts. The seller, @k2motorcars, is responsive to questions, clarifying the car’s modifications and history, which adds informative context to the auction.
Negative: Some comments express disappointment or concern regarding certain features of the car. @Malibubimmer notes the issue with the black grilles, suggesting that the original look would be more appealing. Additionally, @Stables_Group asks about the non-functional air conditioning, indicating it was serviced recently but lacks cold air. Comments from @HBChris also critique the limited comment interaction for enhancing auction visibility, hinting that the seller could improve their engagement to attract more interest.
|
2020 GMC Savana 2500 6.0L Explorer Limited X-SE 4×4 w/Wheelchair Lift
1GTW7BFG2L1156934
Lot 236286
Dealer
 |
Positive: @ARDJAD (The Seller) describes the vehicle as being in like new condition with all rugs and seats in perfect shape, having been used exclusively for a handicapped individual. The seller has made an effort to clarify the vehicle's versatility, indicating that it can serve as either a 9-passenger van or can accommodate a wheelchair user while maintaining passenger capacity. Additional photo requests have been addressed, showing transparency about the vehicle's condition and features, including the undercarriage and lift installation.
Neutral: @BSer notes that this vehicle may be rare and acknowledges the potential challenges in the market for the Handi-swap. @BlackSeaDesperado contributes knowledgeable insights about the Braun lift systems, highlighting that they may involve significant modifications to the vehicle, which implies that removal is not straightforward. @Dennis25 and @Gbfleck2767 raise questions related to wheelchair accessibility, reinforcing a need for clarity on the seating arrangement and vehicle modifications.
Negative: Concerns are voiced about the complexity of the vehicle's setup. @shayndersen seeks clarification on seating arrangements and the release mechanisms, indicating potential frustration with accessibility issues. The comments indicate a possible lack of easy adjustments or access to seating configuration, which could be a deterrent for potential buyers. Overall, there are hints of confusion among potential bidders regarding functionality and modifications needed for desired accessibility, reflecting potential drawbacks that the seller must address.
|
 |
Positive: @Chromantix remarked that this 2016 Porsche Cayenne Diesel is the best looking model they have seen in their extensive search, calling it gorgeous. Many comments highlighted the aesthetic appeal and quality of this vehicle, such as @Pace_Adorno noting how beautifully put-together the car's design is and how well the colors harmonize. @bestman718 and @pinkbunny both praised the cleanliness and low mileage of the Cayenne, while @ReservedSpec emphasized the value of the active CPO warranty, indicating confidence in the car's quality and condition.
Neutral: @Awaweego sought clarification on the conversion of the instrument cluster and was assured by @ztrautohaus that the original cluster remains intact, with only cosmetic changes made to match U.S. specifications. Questions about potential undercarriage issues were raised by @zimdaddy21 and @pinkbunny, with @ztrautohaus providing information about typical surface corrosion in northern climates and discussing standard practices for vehicle maintenance in those conditions. Multiple users, like @jupiter27, expressed unique perspectives on mileage and vehicle alterations when importing.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's undercarriage were voiced by several commenters, including @zimdaddy21, who lamented the impact of road salt on the vehicle's condition. @g958 highlighted potential issues with the alignment due to visible corrosion, while @flyfaster mentioned that Canada was not kind to this Cayenne, suggesting it might have experienced rough conditions. Additionally, @RobertGrimes inquired about specific features like soft close doors and the possibility of unreported repainting, reflecting a level of skepticism surrounding the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: @BlownV8 praised the aesthetic of the Cobra, highlighting its overall appearance and commonly admired features, such as the use of the correct rearward-facing Cobra fender emblem, which is often mishandled in repaints. @Z282SLO noted the rarity of the color combination, emphasizing that only a limited number were produced and expressing appreciation for the little details that were correctly maintained, such as the VIN stickers and badge placements. @laffs and @SayWhen also contributed positively, discussing suspension modifications and how easy it is to adjust or replace the springs for optimal stance.
Neutral: @juanruiz (The Seller) engaged constructively with commenters by thanking them for their observations about the car's rake and clarifying that this stance was set by a previous owner. He responded to inquiries about the car's title history and ownership with transparency, stating that all relevant documentation would be uploaded for clarity. Additionally, he acknowledged concerns regarding the aftermarket modifications and committed to providing a walkthrough video to showcase the car's driving capabilities.
Negative: Despite the praised features, concerns were raised about the car's unusual height and rear rake. Commenters like @FoxCollecter and @BKMotor pointed out multiple owners as indicated on the Carfax report, leading to questions about the car's history and modifications. @RVia100 found the unusually raked height questionable, while @idrivemine had a comment flagged as non-constructive, indicating mixed reactions about the car's overall condition and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @5150Nimrod shared his experience, stating that the vehicle's over-the-air software upgrades work flawlessly, enhancing the ownership experience. He highlighted the fast performance of the car with 800 hp, remarking that it feels very futuristic and devoid of range anxiety. He encourages potential buyers to try the launch control for a thrilling experience. Additionally, @mnstlbtkm expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and expected performance, suggesting upgrades for long-distance use, showing an overall positive impression of the car.
Neutral: @Yuri noted the car's resemblance to a recently sold model, prompting a discussion about its price history and features in relation to its current value. @59turner indicated that while the car's MSRP has dropped, the upgrade to the CCV2 is critical for enhancing its features, aligning it more closely with newer models. This conversation brought attention to the nuances of evaluating this vehicle against its competitors without leaning heavily into positive or negative bias.
Negative: @vman932 critiqued @59turner's commentary about the vehicle's value, pointing out discrepancies in stated features and equipment changes over the years that affect comparisons. He implied that the arguments made were somewhat misleading, possibly reflecting a lack of personal experience with the model. Additionally, @leftlane11 questioned the validity of claims about pricing and feature upgrades, suggesting that the analysis provided by @59turner could be misconstrued, leading to confusion among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous positive comments highlighting its impressive condition and aesthetic appeal. @Jhemss expressed excitement over the car's pristine appearance, calling it a 'Gem' and noting a desire to buy it as a gift for parents. @paul6200 remarked on the beauty and driving capability of the car, indicating that if it's the right one, it is worth purchasing. Additionally, @Crofolks and @LUX-AUTO confirmed the vehicle's ultra-low mileage and complete lack of stored codes, creating a sense of confidence in its quality. Overall, commenters appreciated the car's excellent shape and potential value for any prospective buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters were curious about the vehicle's features and capabilities. @LorenPaul inquired about legroom for taller drivers, while @gb70 asked about the driving experience and requested a video to see it in action. @jeepers84 wanted to ensure that the car was free of odd odors and leaks, pointing to an interest in the overall functionality of the vehicle. @Taipan49 and @daveviperman also engaged in dialogue regarding the appointment for viewing the car, indicating a desire to gather more information before making a commitment without showing a strong bias toward or against the vehicle.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle's history and condition. @daveviperman questioned how the car managed to be in Florida in 2026 but is now up for sale in Illinois, hinting at potential inconsistencies in the seller's narrative. Additionally, @Jdc1963 expressed a need for more detailed information regarding potential wear on the seats and any signs of repair. While these comments did not appear overly critical, they reflect a need for reassurance among interested buyers regarding the vehicle's past and upkeep.
|
 |
Positive: @mgfranco (The Seller) provides strong reassurances about the vehicle's quality, emphasizing the transferable warranty valid until October 2026. The vehicle comes equipped with desirable features such as the Sportivo EVO Trim and Life Style Package, which includes advanced components like a front lifting system and rearview camera. The seller also highlights the car's well-thought-out specifications, noting the impressive carbon ceramic brakes and the LMS Magnetorheological suspension that enhance its performance. @Lex2569 corroborates this with insights about the car's loud exhaust and overall build quality, while other commenters like @boaboyoz express admiration for the vehicle, calling it an absolutely fabulous Florida Huracan EVO RWD Spyder.
Neutral: @Tommy55 questions the reason for selling, hinting that it may not be ideal to let go of such a car quickly. @supercarpnw is practical in asking technical questions about tire age and brake pad measurements, indicating a desire for due diligence before a potential purchase. @bkosaian raises concerns about paint readings and possible damage, which suggests a careful examination of the vehicle's condition is warranted. The seller, @mgfranco, responds to these inquiries transparently, pointing out the PPF's role in reading discrepancies, assuring that there has been no paint work, and providing an update on obtaining a pre-purchase inspection (PPI).
Negative: While the overall impression of the vehicle is positive, some commenters express caution due to the high reading on paint thickness tests and inquire about any previous rental history, highlighting concerns about the vehicle's past usage and maintenance. @bkosaian's questions about paint readings and potential scratches could indicate some unease among prospective buyers regarding the car's condition. The seller, @mgfranco, reassures potential buyers that the high readings are due to protective film and that the car has never been a rental, but the need for a thorough inspection report points to a lingering uncertainty about its state.
|
 |
Positive: @CarDogThreePedals notes that the lead photo of the car is striking, highlighting its Mark V style. @jackjake describes the vehicle as a sleek and stylish grand tourer, highlighting its impressive length compared to modern SUVs. @Hoppy18 expresses appreciation for the beautiful Cartier design, while several commenters, including @Caffeinated25 and @borninthe60s, admire the car's aesthetic and nostalgic value. @Tigers196884 reflects on the vehicle's beauty compared to 1979 fashion, and @WTX_HotRodder fondly recalls family memories tied to a similar Mark V.
Neutral: @Lewis shares a yearning for a smaller vehicle despite his fondness for the Mark V. @67tbirdlover points out the customizable features of the car, noting its unique qualities similar to bespoke vehicles. @USMCSam and several others ask about the vehicle's condition, including details on the headliner and any signs of paint checking, showing a keen interest in understanding the car's state. @MihinduW (The Seller) replies to inquiries, indicating minor blemishes over time but assuring the paint is generally in good condition.
Negative: @maxwolfgang raises a concern about the missing insulation pad on the engine side of the hood. @stevec2024 inquires about potential lacquer checking or micro cracks in the paint finish that could affect the car’s value. @Entusiast questions if the car has undergone any paintwork, suggesting a need for further inspection to confirm its authenticity. Comments from @GP65 and @adnan999 highlight apprehensions regarding the vehicle's condition, with one referencing residual odors that could detract from the experience of owning such a classic.
|
 |
Positive: @ozas17 (The Seller): The 2009 Jeep Patriot is being presented as a reliable daily driver with impressive fuel efficiency and has relatively low mileage of under 13,000 miles. It’s marketed as a great option for those in the market for a dependable vehicle. Enthusiasts like @CoopCity expressed their admiration, calling it 'super base', indicating positive feelings towards its performance and design. @HeavyTank77 humorously compared it to other vehicles, suggesting that it is becoming a classic, showing appreciation for its presence among more luxurious models.
Neutral: @BMWE90Guy provides an interesting perspective mentioning a lack of positive experiences from others with similar vehicles, but also acknowledges that this particular model may be one of the best remaining. @rkjjeep comments on the Jeep Patriot’s design, likening it to a Caliber, which opens up a discussion about its aesthetics rather than performance. Though there may not be strong commitment to praise from @wunkone, they express curiosity regarding the wheels, suggesting a general interest in the vehicle's specifications without direct negativity.
Negative: There are some concerns expressed regarding the vehicle, particularly from @wunkone who questions the reliability of the wheels during sharp turns, hinting at potential handling issues. Despite @ozas17 (The Seller)'s clarification about the tire mount, the concern still reflects some uneasiness about the vehicle's performance under certain conditions. Additionally, @BMWE90Guy’s overall sentiment lacks enthusiasm, reflecting a broader skepticism about the Jeep Patriot based on previous experiences of others, which could deter potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @Temerian (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for his bike, stating it's a joy to ride and gets regular use. @Motocann agrees, praising the beauty of the bike and highlighting that 1964 was a remarkable year for Triumph, appreciating the inclusion of features like the parcel rack. @911tt_7 shares his admiration as a long-time owner of a Triumph, noting the enjoyable experience of riding his own bike and wishing @Temerian well with his sale.
Neutral: @DodgeM37 inquires about the presence of air filters on the carburetors, showing interest in the bike's specifications, while @Temerian responds that the bike currently has velocity stacks but includes K&N filters and additional parts in the sale. @packardv8 comments on the carburetor setup, mentioning that the bike is not typically used as a daily rider in the seller's area and reflects on the preference for dual carburetor configurations found on the Bonneville.
Negative: @yandaman criticizes @Temerian for starting the bike on the side stand, calling it a major mistake for a Triumph rider. @packardv8 also injects a bit of negativity by pointing out that the bike features a single carb and what he perceives as a lack of speed compared to models with dual carbs, suggesting these bikes were not often used in their intended context.
|
2024 Ford F-450 Super Duty Limited Crew Cab Power Stroke Dually 4×4
1FT8W4DM1REF24649
Lot 236310
Private Party
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive torque and overall appearance. @Gmmuscleusa noted its excellent stance and sharp look, while @Hipcheq remarked that it checks every box for him. @Nickgplv referred to it as a nice rig, emphasizing the power of the HO motors, which he compared to a fighter jet. Additionally, @AZkid mentioned that he has a similar truck with customized features, underscoring the popularity and desirability of the model.
Neutral: Some comments focused on clarifications about specific features of the truck and the seller's reasons for selling. @nicksatkovich raised a concern about something found in the tire tread, while another question was about the installation of Starlink. The seller, @EthanTran, addressed these inquiries directly, confirming the tires are uniform and that the Starlink wouldn't be included. Additionally, @themattdog pointed out a minor issue with the retractable cover, which the seller acknowledged with a light-hearted response.
Negative: Conversely, there were critical remarks regarding the truck's wheels and tires. @georgepehanick expressed strong dislike for the tires and wheels, calling it a travesty, a sentiment echoed by others like @Nickgplv, who found the selection disappointing. The harshness of this feedback drew a defensive comment from @9literviper, who chastised @georgepehanick for fixating on the aftermarket wheels rather than the truck's overall qualities. Ultimately, @georgepehanick made it clear he would not be making a purchase because of the wheels.
|
 |
Positive: There are several enthusiastic comments regarding the TechArt-Modified 2009 Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet. @mkxair expresses admiration with a simple "Batmans 911… Basalt Black & Carbon 👌❤️," indicating a strong appreciation for the vehicle's design. Additionally, @ImAGarbageMan shows interest in the car by stating, "Im a fan. WIll be watching!" These comments highlight a positive sentiment toward the car and its aesthetic appeal, suggesting that many find the modifications attractive and desirable.
Neutral: The seller, @stathios, provides comprehensive information about the vehicle, answering inquiries with details about the modifications and its history. Commenters like @Cosmo007 and @rmoudry seek further information about the damage reported in the Carfax, asking about the extent of repairs made. The seller clarifies that the damage is considered minor without documentation of an accident, indicating an effort to provide reassurance to potential buyers. Questions regarding mechanical issues and the modifications' impact on performance also reflect a typical buying consideration, showing that potential buyers are looking for transparency.
Negative: Concerns arise with several comments questioning the condition and modifications of the vehicle. @Wallyremi1 inquires about any known mechanical issues, while @backley844 asks if the modifications affect performance or are merely aesthetic. There is a clear hesitation from some commenters regarding the potential implications of the vehicle's damage history, and there is a sense of uncertainty surrounding the lack of documentation. Furthermore, @nexusautobrokers voices a sentiment that suggests disappointment with the automatic transmission, perceiving it as taking away from the driving experience. This indicates that not all feedback is positive, highlighting some skepticism about the car's overall condition and performance.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the beauty and performance of the RS5. @WsmataU praises the car as an incredible value for under $50k and emphasizes its fun and all-season usability. @bcarsstl shares personal enthusiasm about the stunning Suzuka color in sunlight, while @zspec (The Seller) agrees, noting the owner's tasteful modifications that complement the vehicle's gorgeous paint. Overall, many contributors express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and capabilities.
Neutral: Discussions about the specifications and modifications of the car are prevalent among the comments. @AudiCowboy inquires about the wheels, noting the use of 20" Petal wheels as opposed to the more common 5-spoke Rotors that came with earlier models. @Germanbrew adds insights about these wheels being lighter and questions the presence of Euro headlights on the car. @Jam.Rangs requests further details and pictures of the headlights, indicating an active interest in the car's features, while @zspec (The Seller) confirms he will provide additional images and information as requested.
Negative: Some negativity arises regarding the vehicle's engine reliability and its service history. @TireKicker69 expresses concern about the complexities involved with the engine, mentioning the multiple timing chains often associated with it. Additionally, @dukey raises questions about the car's compatibility with CarPlay and requests service records from 2022, noting that the owner lacks detailed receipts for maintenance performed since then. This raises potential concerns about the car's upkeep and modern technology integration.
|
34k-Mile 2012 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG Wagon P30 Performance Package
WDDHH7EB6CA568644
Lot 236315
Private Party
 |
Positive: Comments regarding the vehicle highlight its rare specifications, particularly the P30 M157 engine paired with RWD, making it known for impressive performance such as 'killer burnouts' while still being practical for everyday use, like grocery shopping. @Jayfurious expressed appreciation for this unique setup, while @IWANTE46 emphasized its status as one of the finest wagons ever made, with @FiveCylinder agreeing on its exceptional aesthetics. Furthermore, @ClayMan28 noted the vehicle's impressive condition, stating that the seller has a robust collection and a discerning eye for quality, claiming that the paint quality is even better in person than in pictures, instilling confidence in potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users brought up practical concerns regarding the vehicle, including questions about the tire date codes, service history, and additional options like the rear entertainment system. @kostea2005 inquired whether the previous recommended service for the differential fluid and sunroof lubrication had been performed, while @Omen asked for assurance regarding smog tests for a California buyer. The seller, @audiophilic, provided detailed answers, confirming that the tires were in excellent shape and outlined various service records, including a recent windshield replacement. The comprehensive communication offered by the seller reflects a commitment to transparency, which is appreciated by potential buyers.
Negative: Negative comments about the vehicle mainly revolve around specific concerns or requirements that potential buyers have, particularly regarding the windshield status and service records. @AjGreenberg inquired about the presence of a chip in the windshield and the vehicle's history concerning key replacements and repairs, seeking clarification that was not fully clear in the description. The seller acknowledged the minor chip and detailed its repair status, indicating it had been assessed and deemed too minor to fill. @kostea2005’s request for confirmation on the functionality of the entertainment screens in the rear also points towards concerns regarding the completeness and operational condition of all features that a buyer may expect.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express excitement and admiration for the unique combination of a BMW 2002tii with a Honda S2000 engine. @Pignose describes the build as a 'head-turning beauty,' while @Jasonghill and @SteadFast praise the project as a perfect match with modern reliability and classic aesthetics. The high level of craftsmanship invested in the car, amounting to over $197K Canadian, resonates well with enthusiasts, with @cruzzer52 highlighting the exhilarating driving experience this configuration promises. @Darren notes the distinctive interior with its Alcantara dash as a unique touch, underscoring the uniqueness of the build.
Neutral: There’s also a healthy amount of curiosity regarding specific features and modifications. @TopperT949 raises a question about the removal of the turbo, while @York suggests that an air conditioning system would enhance the car for everyday driving. @GenauAutoWerks (The Seller) actively engages with questions about the driving video, brake system, and other build details, indicating forthcoming transparency and updates. Some commenters note the practicality of the car's setup, particularly its handling and driver experience mentioned by @Sirjojo, reflecting a mix of both affection and pragmatism for this hybrid vehicle.
Negative: Conversely, some comments highlight concerns from purists and critics. @jolaro1960 expresses disbelief at the extensive investment in a non-original vehicle, questioning the viability of spending such a large sum on a modified classic. @BloodyHell and @Darren express reservations about the modification of a tii, feeling that it is an unnecessary alteration of a rare model. Additionally, concerns about the car's detail work and cleanliness are mentioned by @SlowNRusty, who suggests that an additional level of refinement should have been implemented. Overall, while the car itself garners a lot of enthusiasm, it also faces skepticism from sections of the automotive community.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are impressed with the vehicle's aesthetic, especially the stunning Guards Red color paired with cashmere beige. @boaboyoz described it as a "glorious" and "amazing" car, while @wmorang applauded the combination as hard to beat. @Roth517 noted the exceptional attention to detail in the photo presentation, and @jive expressed appreciation for the car's condition, highlighting how it deserves its auction price. Overall, the consensus indicates a general admiration for this Porsche 911 Carrera S Coupe, with several users wishing it well in the auction.
Neutral: There were some discussions surrounding the warranty of the vehicle, particularly about its mileage and previous ownership. @BillG993 and @Dave_germany raised questions about the service history and discrepancies in the reported odometer readings, which the seller clarified as an original owner car that had been leased before purchase. The seller responded with transparency, explaining the maintenance history and showing a DME report to address concerns regarding the mileage estimated through engine hours. Commenters engaged in the dialogue, sharing their perspectives on the apparent wear of the driver's seat and the relevance of the car's maintenance records.
Negative: On the critical side, some commenters expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of the photography, which they felt obscured the actual condition of the car. @houae23 and @CSquared450 specifically criticized the heavy editing and use of studio lighting that failed to accurately depict the vehicle's state. @jjcat raised concerns about wear on the driver's seat, suggesting that it did not accurately reflect a car with only 22,000 miles. Furthermore, several users echoed apprehensions about the transparency of information provided by the seller, indicating skepticism regarding the true condition of the car and its history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has a rich history, having been passed down through the family since it was purchased new in 1998, which adds sentimental value. @Jwest2026, the seller, has been actively engaging with potential buyers by answering queries promptly and providing updates about the vehicle's condition and maintenance. Notably, the seller confirmed that the air conditioning is functional and responded positively to inquiries about various maintenance tasks completed recently, demonstrating diligence in keeping the vehicle in good shape.
Neutral: Several potential buyers are interested in more detailed information about the vehicle, including specifics about the tires, maintenance history, and the condition of the undercarriage. @5KidsDriving and @corboto requested additional pictures and clarifications regarding the truck's components. The seller is open to these requests and acknowledges the need for further documentation, suggesting a commitment to transparency in the sale process.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's overall condition. There are questions about the play in the driver's seat, which may require attention before a long road trip, as well as inquiries about smoking history in the vehicle, which could affect the interior's condition. Although @Jwest2026 assured potential buyers that the vehicle has not been smoked in, there is still apprehension about whether the remaining elements, such as the brakes and shocks, will require immediate servicing or replacement.
|
 |
Positive: @CarnotEngine noted that the vehicle's mileage compared to a previous listing raises interest, while @RoscoePDogg appreciated its aesthetic, highlighting its status as one of the last Limited models with specific features such as the chrome grille and light-finish Icon wheels. @mike151 showed keen interest in the vehicle by asking if a driving video could be shared, and @puffy71 (The Seller) confirmed that a video would be uploaded shortly, demonstrating responsiveness to potential buyers and engaging with their inquiries.
Neutral: @cstephens85 inquired about the actual mileage on the body, expressing some skepticism due to the visible tow bars, and both @vpchianese and @fredrockm discussed the tow bar setup's details, with @vpchianese noting the lack of a braking system. @greyfoxart sought information about the suspension, while @steviealx asked whether the rest of the tow bar is included, indicating an interest in the technical specifications of the vehicle. Overall, commentors seem engaged and curious about the vehicle's history and functionality.
Negative: @RVARob raised concerns regarding signs of seepage in both differentials and questioned whether they had ever been serviced, while @Robnorthof49 expressed uncertainty about common issues associated with the model, specifically a potential defect in the head that may cause problems. These questions reflect a level of apprehension about the vehicle's maintenance history and reliability, suggesting that prospective buyers should consider these factors seriously before making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the vehicle's unique build and overall design. @CBDiem expressed happiness that the car exists, highlighting its special nature. @gamera called it gorgeous, while @hdbob5454 noted that it is an impressive build. Users like @I8URSVT and @rickaz praised its originality and suggested it could inspire other manufacturers to create similar electric vehicles. Several comments appreciated the modern features such as Bluetooth and digital gauges, which enhance the driving experience.
Neutral: Various comments sought more specific details about the vehicle's specifications. @RFord75578 inquired about the range and horsepower, while @ecrass asked about battery setup and weight. The seller, @juanruiz, responded with technical information regarding the dual motors and power specifications, emphasizing the vehicle's efficient design. Many users expressed curiosity about the vehicle's functionality, with @Meercat and @Ullearn providing technical assessments regarding torque and charging capabilities, indicating a level of engagement with the car's specifications.
Negative: Despite positive feedback, some comments reflected skepticism regarding the vehicle's practicality, especially in terms of performance and charging. @Meercat raised concerns about the vehicle not being suitable for steep inclines, questioning its torque output. Additionally, @ElectricLove and others speculated about the low mileage and the frequency of ownership changes, wondering why such a custom build was sold multiple times. This led to doubts about the car's long-term usability and market appeal, especially when compared to traditional EVs.
|
 |
Positive: @jdccrice commented positively about the truck's appearance, expressing that it's a great looking vehicle. @Shumdit also showed curiosity about the inclusion of both sets of wheels with the purchase, indicating an interest in the truck's features. @GSD_Guy praised the seller's professionalism, highlighting the quality associated with the vehicle's listing.
Neutral: @911r (The Seller) clarified that both sets of wheels are indeed included in the auction, addressing inquiries from potential buyers such as @Shumdit and @2006Fordgt. @Tigers196884 acknowledged the seller's unique position in the market, suggesting that it's rare for someone to relist a vehicle multiple times without a reserve. @Humco raised concerns about the fairness of treating all sellers equally, questioning the lack of a no-reserve option for this listing.
Negative: @ferrous8 expressed skepticism about the likelihood of a successful sale after multiple attempts, suggesting the owner might need to accept a loss. @Humco reiterated this sentiment by arguing that the auction format should be consistent for all sellers, implying that the current setup leans too favorably towards seasoned sellers like @911r. @Stapescrew further questioned the auction's rules, asking for clarity on why this isn't listed as a no reserve auction.
|
 |
Positive: @spacetiger expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a cool old truck. This suggests that the appearance and nostalgic value of the truck resonate well with some viewers, indicating a positive perception of its character and charm.
Neutral: @CoreySwanstrom mentioned that they bid on the truck recently and questioned whether the buyer backed out due to the auction details. @MGABARDI (The Seller) clarified that the truck did not meet the reserve price at auction, providing insight into the vehicle's market status. Additionally, @TGwjacod-akota sought clarification about a red hose attached to the frame, questioning its purpose and functionality.
Negative: @TGwjacod-akota also raised concerns about the functionality of the vehicle, specifically regarding the cab heat and windshield defroster. However, @MGABARDI (The Seller) responded to these concerns by confirming the red hose's purpose as a vent and reassured that the truck is equipped with heat and defrost capabilities, along with a new heater core. This indicates some degree of skepticism among potential buyers regarding the truck's operational aspects.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @skuzzydog, describes the vehicle as a very nice driving car that has been well-cared for over the past 14 years. They emphasize that the car runs excellently in all aspects except for the power top, which they have documented in their comments and videos. @skuzzydog reassures potential buyers that they can drive the car home without any issues, and they have addressed various questions about the car's condition, including the lack of unusual noises from the engine or suspension.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @JIMMY and @brycal01, have pointed out some concerns regarding the vehicle, notably the inoperable convertible top and discrepancies in the transmission information. @skuzzydog has acknowledged these points, confirming the top issues while explaining the complexity of diagnosing which sensor is faulty. The seller also clarified that the automatic transmission was ordered as an option while providing additional details about the car's condition and maintenance history.
Negative: Concerns have arisen among potential buyers regarding the vehicle, specifically about the power top not functioning and the need for diagnostics that can be costly. @brycal01 commented on the potential repair expenses associated with the top, while @HARRYB3 and @JIMMY raised questions about the air conditioning and recall issues. Additionally, there are suspicions regarding the car's intake valves, with some commenters referencing a history of issues in similar models, though @skuzzydog defends the car's reliability based on their long-term ownership experiences.
|
1994 Jeep Wrangler Sahara 4.0 5-Speed Jurassic Park Tribute
1J4FY49S6RP458140
Lot 236242
Private Party
 |
Positive: @JohnF1966 notes that YJ Jeeps, particularly the 4.0 fuel-injected models, are anticipated to become highly collectible in the near future. @rustyray expresses interest in the vehicle, suggesting that he wouldn't mind seeing it in his driveway. @MagicJames101 comments on the solid condition of the vehicle, indicating that a good detailing would enhance its presentation significantly. @Ptreedman91 (The Seller) shares that the Jeep has been involved in various enjoyable events since 2021, which adds to its appeal and history.
Neutral: @kangarrpac acknowledges that the Jeep is a nice tribute, though it may lack screen accuracy and requires some work if perfect authenticity is desired. @TireKicker69 asks about the rear lights and suggests that more pictures without the hard top would be beneficial. @fsacb3 discusses the rear lights' configuration and expresses confusion regarding their function, indicating that details are important to potential buyers. @Winnet2go inquires about the factory paint code, showing a focus on authenticity.
Negative: @Moneyrush101 criticizes the poor paint job on the wheels, suggesting that the aesthetics may detract from the vehicle's overall appeal. Additionally, @fsacb3 expresses confusion about the vehicle's light modifications, which could raise concerns about the quality of previous modifications. Overall, there are hints of skepticism regarding the condition and modifications of the Jeep, which may influence buyer interest.
|
 |
Positive: @Bordeaux describes the vehicle as a "true old school" Bentley, highlighting its class, elegance, and beauty, suggesting it stands apart from more modern cars. @JohnnyBravoIII (The Seller) expresses his satisfaction with the car, noting it's one of the best he has owned and appreciates its trouble-free operation. He mentions the exceptional air conditioning in the car as a bonus, and @teamcj agrees, reinforcing that the 5,000 miles driven in the past year only adds to its desirability. @ww73916 shares a personal account of his admiration for Bentley cars, particularly noting the importance of driving them frequently and praising the condition and maintenance of the auctioned vehicle.
Neutral: @TERRYM questions why the car is being sold so soon after purchase, indicating interest in understanding the seller's motivation. @Dan M,PDX inquires about the vehicle's history concerning emissions testing in previous states of ownership. @OnceUponATime asks @JohnnyBravoIII about the service records and maintenance details, showing a cautious approach typical of potential buyers looking for transparency regarding the vehicle's maintenance history.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments about the car itself; however, @TERRYM's question regarding the quick sale might imply concerns about the car's reliability or value retention. Additionally, @OnceUponATime's inquiry about service records implies a desire for assurances that may reflect unease regarding the maintenance history. Overall, the comments are predominantly positive and inquisitive rather than critical.
|
 |
Positive: @dkloth praises the car's gorgeous appearance and excellent upgrades, remarking on its impressive performance as a past driver of a similar model. @Kcampo01 expresses strong appreciation for the car, especially the 20-spoke wheels, noting their aesthetic appeal. @DG968, the seller, provides thorough information about the car's performance enhancements and maintenance history, confirming recent upgrades to key components like timing and balance belts, and highlighting the car's reliability and readiness for long trips. Multiple commenters, including @PSU_Crash and @mdu911sc, also show enthusiasm for the car, with @PSU_Crash expressing a desire to own it and @mdu911sc reflecting on their past experiences with similar models.
Neutral: Several commenters ask practical questions about the vehicle's features, such as @TimUrs6Avant inquiring about the availability of factory wheels, which the seller confirms are no longer available. @salty_dog requests additional photos of the CV boots, reflecting a concern for thorough inspection before potential purchase. There are also inquiries about specific electrical features from @merclurker and @Btyrrel1, both seeking assurance about the functionality of components like the A/C and potential odors. @DG968 responds with detailed information, confirming that all electrical systems work but noting the turn signal mechanism requires attention.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @PSU_Crash regarding the dyno graph, which several commenters describe as "lumpy" or not smooth, leading to discussions about the car's driveability, especially on track. @salty_dog highlights a need for better clarity on the dashboard's condition, indicating potential worries about aging components and reliability. Also, @bigsexyx5 points out a perceived color mismatch on the driver’s side door, questioning any past repainting issues, while @dkloth brings up the risk of rear hatch delamination typical in such vehicles as a potential drawback.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, appreciating its design and potential. @packardv8 complimented the car as a nice example, while @johanwarner reminisced fondly about similar models he owned, indicating a solid respect for the vehicle's aesthetic and heritage. @Acobalt964 noted there is a lot to like about the 2002, affirming its desirable features. Additionally, @LouFifer praised the car as a lovely early round coupe, showing enthusiasm for its model, which hints at a community of enthusiasts who may see great value in the vehicle.
Neutral: There were numerous inquiries from potential buyers seeking clarity on various aspects of the vehicle. @BDurr and @HushDrew both highlighted the need for answers regarding the functionality of the turn signal switch and the vehicle's history since it was last operational. Several inquiries about the recommissioning work required were raised, with commenters like @cruzer_77 and @RedTruck seeking more specifics on what repairs or servicing the car might need after being in non-operation status. This reflects a common desire for transparency in vehicle conditions, especially in auction scenarios.
Negative: On the other hand, there were concerns voiced regarding the seller's lack of responsiveness amid many unanswered questions. @LouFifer pointed out the risks associated with the seller's silence, suggesting that it may indicate deeper issues with the car that are not readily visible. Commenters expressed frustrations about the potential implications of prolonged non-operation and the uncertainties surrounding necessary repairs. @PhilNiekro noted that the seller's username referencing a zodiac sign rather than a personal name was perceived as insensitivity, which further dampened trust among bidders. Overall, a sense of unease about the vehicle's condition and the seller's communication loomed large in the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express a positive sentiment about the vehicle, noting its functionality and potential for enjoyment. @Luckybunny mentions that the car offers a great 'smiles-per-dollar' ratio for those looking for a top-down fun driver, emphasizing its mechanical reliability and the joy it brings after over two decades of ownership. @kingkarmann points out that despite its salvage title, the vehicle appears to be in decent shape, noting that it runs well and is a sound project for any classic car enthusiast. Additionally, there is appreciation for its solid body as seen in various photos, suggesting it might exceed typical expectations for this model.
Neutral: There are also several neutral comments that request additional information and clarification. @rcollins asks for verification regarding the vehicle's previous Ohio salvage title, which highlights the importance of transparency during the sale process. @OkieTim and @Lewis both request additional photos of specific features, particularly the roll-down rear quarter windows, indicating a desire for thorough inspection before making any decisions. These comments reflect a general curiosity and desire for more detail rather than discontent.
Negative: On the negative side, some comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition and documentation. @stevenvillatoro corrects a detail in the listing, indicating that the seller may have overlooked some critical information. @kingkarmann expresses worries about the potential lack of enough photos and the overall shape of the underside of the car, suggesting that it might not be as sound as claimed. The request for more in-depth inspection hints at doubts regarding the structural integrity and true state of the vehicle, which could be a concern for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @43Institute (The Seller) expresses gratitude to Tuthill for providing a unique experience through 43i, highlighting the exclusivity of the program and the charitable cause behind it. Many comments, like those from @boaboyoz and @dailydrivenlotus, underscore the thrill and excitement associated with the experiences offered, emphasizing the high-quality service provided by Richard Tuthill and his crew. @CKKurtz shares that even though this isn’t an auction for a vehicle, it has easily captured their interest as one of the most exciting opportunities available, showcasing the appeal of the offering.
Neutral: The comments collectively suggest a strong interest in the unique experiences available through this vehicle program without diving into specifics about the vehicle's specifications or performance metrics. @boaboyoz and others acknowledge the fun involved in the offerings, potentially attracting a diverse crowd interested in both driving and supporting a good cause. However, the focus primarily remains on the experiences tied to the vehicle rather than on the vehicle itself.
Negative: There are no directly negative comments regarding the vehicle or the experiences provided. The feedback appears overwhelmingly positive, with no critiques or complaints highlighted from participants or commenters. This could suggest that the offerings have been well-received, but a lack of critical discussion might also indicate a need for more in-depth input on the actual vehicle performance, if applicable.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express appreciation for the seller's transparency and the thoroughness of the vehicle's maintenance history. @hshillsh thanked @Oespinal (The Seller) for the detailed response regarding the cooling system and repairs made, indicating it was very helpful. Furthermore, @KZN185Surf shared positive feedback about the dealership's reputation, noting their mechanics are top-notch, which adds credibility to the seller's claims about the vehicle’s care. Overall, commenters acknowledge the seller's proactive approach in addressing concerns and maintaining the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters have requested more information about various aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding its engine performance and the air conditioning system. Questions from users like @SeanRafferty and @camp6ell pointed out the lack of information about the AC in the listing, reflecting a common curiosity regarding this feature. @Oespinal (The Seller) has consistently encouraged potential buyers to contact him directly for further inquiries, showing a willingness to engage with interested parties although not all comments specific to the engine's past were definitively answered.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding unanswered questions, particularly surrounding the engine’s performance history, including any overheating incidents or cylinder head work done. Specific inquiries from users such as @hshillsh and @orttauq point to a perceived need for more thorough documentation regarding the vehicle's past, especially related to its cooling system and overall reliability. The ongoing ambiguity about the air conditioning functionality also remains a point of frustration for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @70_duster expressed a strong preference for this vehicle over side-by-sides, indicating a positive view of its capabilities. @D652149488007 (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's strong features, including a powerful and quiet AC, good acceleration, and an enjoyable driving experience. Additionally, @carsfromafar commented positively on the vehicle's cleanliness and reliability, having sold it previously and trusting it for long-distance driving.
Neutral: @Celticcross inquired about the AC's performance, showing curiosity without a definitive stance on the vehicle. @haasni87 also asked about the condition of the radio or head unit, indicating interest but not fully expressing his assessment of the vehicle. @Blackbelt acknowledged the appealing look of the vehicle but shared apprehension about its quick sales history, reflecting a cautious but interested perspective.
Negative: @Rigoli raised concerns regarding the frequency of past sales, hinting at possible underlying issues with the vehicle. @HallnSS67 remarked on the vehicle's rapid turnover, emphasizing the potential red flags associated with it having four owners in three years. @sekter01 and @DE1033ph both asked questions about aftermarket modifications, implying suspicion about the vehicle's condition or history, which casts doubt for potential bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @fiorski (The Seller) has clarified some key details regarding the vehicle, confirming that there are no fluid leaks and the rust present is only surface rust. This assurance could put potential buyers at ease about the vehicle's condition and suggests transparency in communication.
Neutral: Questions have arisen regarding the model year of the vehicle, as @rickr8830 noted a discrepancy between the listing as a 1977 model and the title indicating 1976. @fiorski (The Seller) provided clarification on this by sharing a response from Bring A Trailer, explaining the difference between production dates and model year designations. Additionally, @Tinneric16 and @Jreilly17car inquired about specific details such as tire date codes and the possibility of cold start or driving videos, which have yet to be addressed.
Negative: The comments include some uncertainty and concern, especially from @Dupodean, who expressed alarm with an "Oh-oh," suggesting that potential buyers may need more reassurances regarding the vehicle’s condition or documentation before making a decision. This indicates that despite some positive notes, there are lingering doubts that could affect buyer interest.
|
 |
Positive: @nicaland highlights the impressive features of the vehicle, especially emphasizing the importance of the PASM suspension system for street use. They point out that it greatly improves comfort on rough roads and adjusts to driving conditions, providing a superior experience compared to a standard suspension. The combination of well-specified options, including sport seats and steering wheel, enhances the overall driving experience of the car.
Neutral: @SpOkayman agrees with @nicaland about the value of the options, particularly PASM. They express curiosity about the accident history and repaint work done on the car, noting that it appears that most panels have been repainted. @hsingh7 (The Seller) acknowledges the lack of detailed history but assures potential buyers that the vehicle is mechanically in great shape and is willing to provide additional images or information as needed.
Negative: Commenters, including @Spokayman and @chaysua, raise concerns about the car's history, specifically the clarity surrounding repaint work and the presence of soft indentations on the front bumper. @hsingh7 (The Seller) admits that they have limited information on the car's past, as they rely on Carfax and receipts, which may cause hesitation among potential buyers regarding its overall condition and maintenance.
|
 |
Positive: @lockhrt1 described the 1993 Cadillac Sedan Deville as absolutely beautiful, highlighting its quality as one of the best cars produced by G.M. and wishing success in finding it a deserving home. @carfan1978 echoed these sentiments by noting the car's beauty and expressing a desire to add it to their collection if space allowed. @Vaquero427 shared personal experience with a similar model, praising the car's smooth ride, roominess, and durability, which he witnessed over many years, underscoring the model's appeal to Cadillac enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @Chadwyck, provided insights into the vehicle's history, revealing that it was traded from the son of the original owner and has been kept in the family since 1993. They addressed potential concerns about damage, specifically the rear bumper, explaining it was pushed in due to a minor accident and that the vehicle remains in good condition aside from that. In response to inquiries about mechanical issues, @Chadwyck mentioned some minor electrical problems with the radio and antenna and expressed hope for a simple fix that could keep repair costs manageable.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several commenters regarding the car's condition. @chrisbusnut asked why the seller didn't repair the bumper before listing, indicating potential buyer hesitation due to the visible damage. @jer4cars noted additional damage beyond just the rear bumper, mentioning issues with the quarter panel and front bumper. Overall, while the car has strong appeal and a solid reputation, these issues could deter some potential buyers looking for a pristine vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed enthusiasm about the 1997 Nissan Pickup XE, noting its reliability and suitability for various needs. @maw06 praised the truck's fun driving experience and ease of maintenance, mentioning its supporting role in a church. @melan47 shared fond memories of a similar truck, highlighting its performance and fuel efficiency during his college years, while @topduarte called it a perfect first vehicle for a high school student.
Neutral: The seller, @sportstx, provided detailed information about the truck's condition, including that it has had one owner and has never failed an emissions test in Texas. They clarified the vehicle's history in response to inquiries about minor damage records on Carfax, stating that one entry about front damage was incorrect. Additional insights were given regarding the truck's maintenance records and the age of its tires, ensuring potential buyers feel informed before making a decision.
Negative: Some comments indicated concern about the need for further information regarding the truck's rear end oil change and the overall maintenance that might come with a used vehicle. @topduarte specifically asked about the thread, age of tires, and condition of belts and hoses, while others indirectly commented on the risk of buying a vehicle with any past damage records, however unsubstantiated they may be.
|
 |
Positive: The 1994 Mercedes-Benz SL500 has received positive remarks for its well-maintained condition, having been primarily owned in Washington and recently undergoing significant services. @sclauto (The Seller) highlights that major components like the wiring harness and throttle body were replaced in June 2023, and previous paintwork on the hardtop was addressed in February 2026. Commenters such as @joe.stephenson appreciate the aesthetic appeal of the two-tone design typical of this model, noting that it exemplifies the quality of design from that era under Bruno Sacco.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been raised about specific features of the vehicle, particularly regarding the chrome fender covers. @FlyoverCountry asked whether the covers are screwed on or pressed on, to which @sclauto (The Seller) clarified that they are riveted on. Conversations also touched on shipping responsibilities, with @Sethhar questioning who would cover the costs, and @sclauto responding that the buyer would be fully responsible for shipping. Additionally, discussions about the removal of the chrome fender covers arose, with @PJA1971 expressing interest in the process and @adamjmck105 sharing insights on potential removal techniques.
Negative: There have been a few hints of disappointment among commenters regarding certain vehicle features. For instance, @deleted expressed frustration over their initial assumption about the chrome fender covers being attached with double-sided tape rather than rivets. Although the vehicle's condition is generally praised, some technical aspects, like the necessity to drill out rivets for modifications, may deter potential buyers who are apprehensive about altering the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @mschomburg2025 (The Seller) received praise from @Mugwumpy who expressed admiration for the restoration of the Jeep, calling it a nice result and a fine example for his own project. @mschomburg2025 (The Seller) highlighted the efforts made during the restoration to maintain the original appearance while ensuring the vehicle remains dependable and enjoyable to drive. Overall, the restoration has attracted positive comments about the Jeep's aesthetic and functionality, indicating satisfaction among potential buyers and enthusiasts.
Neutral: @ammfbsw inquired about the condition of the 4wd system and the fiberglass tub, to which @mschomburg2025 (The Seller) confirmed that the 4wd was functioning well at the time of restoration and shared details about the high-quality, hand-made fiberglass tub. @caldwelk commented on the Jeep's appearance, expressing curiosity about the installation of the soft top and its door hinges, while @fsacb3 asked about the availability of videos for potential buyers, to which @mschomburg2025 (The Seller) confirmed that a driving video would be available soon.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @ammfbsw regarding the mechanical condition of the brakes and other components. Although @mschomburg2025 (The Seller) affirmed that the brakes were in fine condition and had been refurbished, questions remain about certain features like the blower motor and windshield wipers. @DRCSKC asked why the blower motor was not replaced during restoration and whether the windshield wipers functioned properly, to which @mschomburg2025 (The Seller) acknowledged that the blower motor worked initially but had a different setup after restoration, leaving the wipers untested due to limited driving conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @AAAMOTORCARS (The Seller) expresses gratitude to all viewers and highlights their availability to assist with shipping, demonstrating a commitment to customer service. They also provide assurance of the car's condition, mentioning that it has been thoroughly inspected and certified. Additionally, they offer to send more pictures to help potential buyers better gauge the vehicle's appearance, indicating a willingness to address concerns directly.
Neutral: @AAAMOTORCARS (The Seller) addresses inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance records by stating that only the Carfax report is available, while confirming that it has been smog certified and inspected. They also respond to questions about spare keys and the condition of the oil pan, providing reassurance that the car does not leak and encouraging prospective buyers to inspect the vehicle themselves. The seller engages in open communication, which may indicate a transparent selling process.
Negative: @Ironmikeh raises a concern about the appearance of the front and rear bumper covers, questioning whether the color issue is due to age or lighting. @Ldr2025 inquires about the maintenance history, expressing a desire for more information beyond the available Carfax report. @Steviecat's questions about the age of the spare tire and the need for close-up images of certain parts reflect potential hesitations regarding the vehicle's condition that could impede buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters appreciated the seller's responsiveness and willingness to provide additional information about the vehicle. @CAGNASH (The Seller) made efforts to enhance the listing by adding videos, which were helpful in providing a clearer view of the car's features. Many found the overall presentation of the listing engaging and inviting, creating a positive bidding atmosphere.
Neutral: Some comments reflected general inquiries about the vehicle without indicating strong feelings either way. @CAGNASH (The Seller) was proactive in encouraging potential buyers to ask questions, showing a commitment to clear communication. The tone was generally informative, keeping potential bidders updated about the auction process and remaining time.
Negative: There were no distinctly negative comments regarding the vehicle or the seller's approach. However, there was a lack of critical feedback, which might suggest that users either did not find concerns worth mentioning or that their questions did not raise any immediate issues. Overall, the comments reflected a satisfactory experience without explicit negativity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its cool patina and solid build. @93TOY and @70_duster both appreciate the classic look, noting it would be a fun addition to their collection. @Farfman suggests improvements like adding A/C for comfort, while others agree on its originality, such as @gritsandbourbon, who loves the combination of the exterior's patina with a well-kept interior. The Seller, @Ap67et10, elaborates on the car's features, assuring potential buyers that the vehicle runs great and has maintained much of its original character, including the interior details.
Neutral: Some commenters focus on aspects that need attention, asking questions about specific features and maintenance. @T-BobRoller raises practical inquiries regarding the condition of the door hinges and seals, while @HardingNJAutoEmpire requests a cold start video, which @Ap67et10 promptly provides. Users like @markl350 and @oldschool46 mention the need for potential repairs, particularly regarding patched areas and the condition of the paint and floor. These neutral comments often reflect a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: Conversely, a few comments express concerns about the overall quality of the vehicle. @markl350 quips about the condition of the floor with humor, pointing out it's patchy, indicating possible hidden issues. @upnorthdowntown requests a thorough check of the windscreen due to local regulations, hinting at the likelihood of issues needing resolution before a purchase. @squirrellymerley mentions a full garage hindering a potential purchase, while @Ap67et10 acknowledges this, keeping transparency about the vehicle's condition and repairs, suggesting that some buyers may find the existing rust a deterrent.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is being marketed by @greenerdays11 (The Seller) as a clean 2012 Range Rover Sport HSE that has recently undergone a fresh oil change, indicating a level of care for maintenance. Commenter @AIRCOOLEDCOLLECTION noted that these vehicles are generally great, sharing personal experiences of owning L320s without significant timing chain issues. They also pointed out that proper care, particularly regular oil changes, can extend the life of the engine, further emphasizing that the seller appears to present a well-maintained example which may gain recognition over time for its balance between classic and modern design.
Neutral: While @bobzcad raised specific questions about potential fluid leaks and other drivability concerns, @greenerdays11 (The Seller) reassured them that the observed water under the undercarriage stemmed from washing rather than actual leaks, also promising to provide more undercarriage pictures. Balancing concerns about maintenance records, @bobzcad inquired further about the service history and the timing chains, while acknowledging the need for thorough documentation to ensure the buyer is informed of potential issues.
Negative: However, there is an undercurrent of concern regarding the vehicle's condition, as @bobzcad persisted in asking about service records and specific mechanical issues, including potential timing chain replacements and transmission performance. @LECain pointed out common problems that typically surface in these models after several years, asking for details like tire dates and the status of the A/C. These inquiries suggest that despite the seller's positive presentation, prospective buyers remain cautious about the vehicle's long-term reliability and repair costs.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect appreciation for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @mick59 notes that the custom Beetle is doing fine and compliments its great color combination, while @a410traveler considers the overall look of the car quite nice, appreciating its stance as a personal style choice. @Rumbling also expresses enthusiasm, mentioning a stylish feature—the center console—and inquiring about its origin, which adds to the positive vibe surrounding the car.
Neutral: Several commenters provide more neutral observations regarding the vehicle’s stance, indicating varied preferences among potential buyers. @Kronk suggests that the lowering of the front end could be easily reversed with a couple of hours of work, while others, like @Luckywheels and @flyboy91901, share opinions on the vehicle's stance, neither heavily criticizing nor praising it. Additionally, @Empidean65 comments on a specific detail regarding the engine, which suggests a neutral stance as they are commenting on factual elements of the vehicle.
Negative: There are a few critical remarks regarding the condition and modifications of the vehicle. @wentwoja1234 questions the difficulty of unloading the front end since it has been lowered, implying concern over practicality. @MissMyE30 expresses frustration over not finding a promised video of the car running, which other commenters also seem to echo. Furthermore, various comments point towards aspects of the car's stance and modifications that some feel detract from its appeal, indicating that attention should be given to these details to satisfy all prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle. @Cotullaguy described the car as "very cute," while @jnag praised @wheresmyblinker for being an honest seller and noted that the vehicle feels like a time capsule. @Ocoanater commented on the car's beautiful white interior, and @ForeverClapped testified to the quality of the E30, sharing their experience working on it and how impressed they were with its condition. Additionally, @JGraham mentioned the car's low mileage and described it as well preserved, hinting that it is fun to drive and capable of high speeds with ease.
Neutral: @wheresmyblinker provided insights into the car, explaining its background and mechanical overhaul, indicating a longstanding dedication to maintaining its condition. The seller acknowledged comments and questions from potential buyers, including clarifying more about the car's aspects such as the clutch cylinders and trunk pictures. @Nyp2208 expressed interest in viewing the vehicle, while @Rudi2 inquired about the A/C and other functionalities, indicating a general curiosity about the car's working order.
Negative: Despite the generally positive impressions, some concerns were raised about specific aspects of the car. @OttoBob mentioned that while the car is a perfect town vehicle with a great engine, its fuel economy was not as good as advertised. @Rudi2 also pointed out the potential issue with the A/C cooling down properly as @wheresmyblinker admitted it might need freon or a conversion due to a small leak. Overall, comments highlighted a blend of admiration for the car alongside some practical inquiries and reservations.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments have praised the vehicle for its excellent condition and appearance. @Catmochanic described it as a "nice looking rig" that is "exceptionally clean all around" with an awesome color combination. @Heyjpark expressed appreciation for the confirmation of the EGR delete, stating it is a nice truck. Additionally, @Larsmeister32 noted their excitement about the auction, highlighting the well-presented vehicle, its upgrades, and modifications, showing that there is enthusiasm among potential bidders.
Neutral: The seller, @4byFreak, has actively engaged with potential buyers, addressing questions and concerns. They confirmed the EGR delete and provided details about the vehicle's history, such as the previous owner having inherited it and spending significantly on the engine. They mentioned that while the truck is generally in great shape, there are minor imperfections like a small dent and scratch. The seller also offered various upgrades made to the truck, like fresh oil and new brake pads, while being upfront about the lack of comprehensive service records aside from what's on the CarFax.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's overall condition and history. @jkwhite posed multiple questions about whether significant components, like head studs and injectors, had been repaired or replaced, to which the seller confirmed the engine had not been bulletproofed and still has head bolts. Additionally, @migueld77 speculated that people might be placing bids just to inflate the price. Comments from @Limitedtime highlighted the need for photos that could indicate whether the head studs had been done or if additional checks were necessary.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the unique characteristics of the vehicle, particularly its provenance. @car-collector expresses admiration for the car’s provenance, hinting at its historical significance. @Fleche_dOr agrees, acknowledging the car's presence and opulent feel, suggesting that while it may have needs, it presents an opportunity for someone familiar with refurbishment. Overall, there is a sense of appreciation for the car's powerful performance and its enjoyable driving experience, indicating that potential buyers might find it compelling despite its few issues.
Neutral: Some commenters discuss specifics about the vehicle's history and maintenance. @Undatakr raises a question regarding the odometer's accuracy, to which @memphisto clarifies that it remained in miles. Furthermore, @Fleche_dOr notes that while the car does not have the substantial ownership documentation typical of other collector cars, he expresses a personal preference for cars that have been used rather than those with very low mileage. This highlights a neutral perspective on the vehicle's condition and history, which may appeal to some buyers looking for a driving experience.
Negative: Concerns are voiced regarding the lack of substantial provenance and clear history associated with the vehicle. @Fleche_dOr expresses confusion about the claims of provenance, suggesting that the documented ownership does not seem significant. Additionally, @nav77 mentions the importance of the engine's history, but @Fleche_dOr reiterates that this does not equate to ownership provenance. @3JM also calls attention to the need for more specific details regarding the tires, indicating a desire for transparency that is not fully met in the current listing.
|
 |
Positive: @Carguy48 expresses admiration for the Aston Martin's color, stating that "Skyfall Silver shows lines so much better than black" and wishes the vehicle had a third pedal, alluding to a preference for manual transmissions. He believes the car is worth more than its current bid of $81,000 given its low mileage of 24,000. @Symbolic_International reassures bidders that the car has been meticulously maintained and will be back in the showroom for inspections and test drives. He also appreciates the sentiment behind @Carguy48's comments about the exceptional care provided to the vehicle.
Neutral: @Symbolic_International shares the history of the Aston Martin, emphasizing its ownership by well-known jeweler Leo Hamil. He invites potential bidders to inquire further and highlights the car's current California compliance, encouraging inspections and test drives. The seller addresses various bidders' concerns about tire conditions, maintenance records, and minor imperfections, maintaining a welcoming and helpful attitude throughout the auction process.
Negative: There are concerns about the condition of the vehicle's front carbon splitter. @FSAR raises issues about potential damages previously noted in another auction and questions the seller about the car’s previous listing, creating confusion regarding representation. @FSAR ultimately decides to withdraw from bidding, stating that the persistent repetition of the same story and lack of clarity on damage issues made him uncomfortable with the auction process. @Brokendrum also points out inconsistencies in the seller's statements about the car's prior listing.
|
 |
Positive: @Shawh expresses excitement about the Ferrari 348, calling it "a great little Ferrari" and wishes the consigner good luck. @VolvoguyKC describes the car as stunning and praises the amazing black color. @mike_747 acknowledges the car's contemporary appeal despite its 90's design due to the black paint.
Neutral: @iLussoOC (The Seller) provides updates to inquiries, stating that they will post a video showing the headlights operating as well as photos of the wheels, and reassures that everything works as it should. They also note that high-end cars often change hands quickly, without a specific reason for the sale after just four months. @Cosmo007 asks several questions regarding the functionality of the headlights and the engine replacement, seeking additional documentation and clarification from the seller.
Negative: @Cosmo007 raises concerns about the headlights only showing in the UP position and the engine replacement history. @mike_747 and @1lotus1 express skepticism regarding the quick sale and the changes to the original interior color sticker. @ChoonHound speculates that the motor was more likely removed for service than replaced, while @1lotus1 lists multiple unanswered questions about the vehicle's history and current condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and enthusiasm about the experience being offered, highlighting it as a unique opportunity. @Arutt330 simply described it as "Dope!!!" while @mpowers76 referred to it as "bad ass!!" Several participants commented on the thrill of the event, with @ktm_rick sharing memories of watching Travis Pastrana at the X Games and expressing their long-standing admiration for him. @boaboyoz emphasized not only the cool factor of the trip but also the charitable aspect, underscoring that the auction supports a great cause. Commenters like @TheGuesser echoed sentiments of excitement with humor, setting a vibrant tone for the auction.
Neutral: Several comments included logistical questions and general curiosity about the event. @mcj4250 speculated about needing to sign a waiver, while @SR4 sought clarification on what would be included in the day, covering aspects like food and equipment. @Tborn inquired about age restrictions for guests, showing interest in participation details. These questions reveal that while there is a high level of enthusiasm, potential bidders are also looking for more information before engaging fully in the auction process.
Negative: There were a few light-hearted concerns and humorous remarks that hinted at safety issues surrounding the adventure, such as @craZee's query about life insurance. @McLaren jokingly mentioned needing a hotline, indicating a sense of concern regarding the risks involved. Meanwhile, @Thomas54's comment about learning to do a double backflip followed by "Nope" suggests apprehension or disbelief about the feasibility of some of the stunts involved. Although these comments were made in jest, they highlighted an understanding of the wild nature of the experience and acknowledged possible hesitance among some participants.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the comments regarding the Jaguar XK140 are overwhelmingly positive. Commenters such as @Madmaxer and @MNberg describe the car as a stunning example of automotive craftsmanship, highlighting its beautiful color combination and historical significance as one of the fastest production cars of its time. The seller, @ZackJaguar, shares that the car has been a joy to own and drive, often attracting attention and compliments from others. Several commenters appreciate the celebrity connection to @MichaelDouglas, indicating that it adds a layer of charm and allure to the vehicle, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: There are also neutral inquiries regarding the car's features, such as @TwoDogsRichards questioning the availability of a soft top and side curtains, to which @ZackJaguar confirms their inclusion. Other commenters express curiosity about the car's history, with @jaed2 specifically asking for images of Douglas with the car, indicating a desire for additional provenance. Comments about the car's specifications and history, like those from @Bordeaux and @davidxk, introduce more technical discussions about its manufacturing details and restoration, but they do not stray into negative territory, showing a balanced perspective.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raise concerns about the authenticity of the car given its modifications, such as the non-original color and C-type head. @Wsby and @davidxk discuss potential scoring deductions that may arise from these non-authentic features if the car were to be judged at concours events. Other commenters express skepticism about the celebrity connection being leveraged for marketing, with @Optimader and @hueyhoolihan questioning the relevance of previous ownership by a celebrity when it comes to the intrinsic value of the car. While these concerns are valid, they do not deter the overall positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle's desirability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the stunning design and features of the 2024 Ferrari Roma coupe. @CFD noted the wonderful color combination, emphasizing that the Roma looks best in dark colors, while @mike_747 agreed with this sentiment, highlighting the strong specifications and attractive blue color of the car. @bemrfst praised the Roma's aesthetics, likening it to a modern-day Daytona. The seller, @k2motorcars, showcased the premium options of the car including rich Cuoio leather upholstery and advanced features that enhance both performance and comfort.
Neutral: Several comments sought additional information about the vehicle, including inquiries about the window sticker and warranty details. @clmorris asked for the window sticker, and @XXIV inquired if the car had paint protection film and noted possible staining on the passenger seat, suggesting more photos would be beneficial. The seller responded positively to these questions, confirming that they would provide requested details and clarifications. @Snowhill also joined in requesting warranty information and a copy of the window sticker, reflecting a general interest in the car's specifics.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the car's condition and potential imperfections. @XXIV pointed out the passenger seat damage and staining, while @twsn696 observed what appeared to be indentations on the roof visible in the video, speculating it might be from a roof rack. These comments highlighted that while the Roma is admired for its design, there are still queries about its condition that potential buyers might want clarified before bidding.
|
 |
Positive: @rrmantz37 (The Seller) shared a touching story about the reason behind restoring this particular Oldsmobile Cutlass, as it was a cherished memory of his late wife who had once owned the same model. The sentimentality behind the restoration is reflected in comments from others, such as @Uby67vw1958, who emphasized that no amount of money can measure the love invested in such a project. Many commenters, like @borninthe60s and @Longmire45, appreciated the car's aesthetic and potential for classic car enthusiasts, noting its beauty and suitability as a great cruiser.
Neutral: Several commenters pondered the high restoration cost, with remarks from @carfan1978 and @TonyGto questioning the logic behind spending over $42,000 on a vehicle that originally cost much less. Others, like @Dollycat3 and @MonteCutlass, acknowledged the nostalgia and personal stories tied to similar vehicles, suggesting that sometimes sentimental value outweighs financial considerations. Comments from @SDCR and @jb455 focused on the importance of context and backstory in understanding the investment in the vehicle, with some expressing general curiosity about the circumstances behind such expenditures.
Negative: Criticism of the restoration costs was prevalent, with commenters like @FerdBird and @mbz2000 stating that someone appeared to have been taken advantage of. @RWD-FTW echoed similar sentiments by highlighting the car's low horsepower and questioning the financial rationale of the restoration. Concerns regarding the condition of the car, as noted by @TonyGto and @joeveto, also raised doubts about the value of the restoration work done, while @gord6 humorously remarked about the implications of listing the car at no reserve. Overall, the discussion reflected skepticism about the financial aspects of the car's restoration against its sentimental value.
|
 |
Positive: @gendia remarked on the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, calling the 981 GTS 'very beautiful.' @x73 praised the car’s suspension, labeling it as 'the best suspension option.' @MattyGatch noted that for a car with many modifications, it looks almost completely stock, complimenting the seller's work. @lzrm expressed enthusiasm by stating he would love to see a driving video, while @911r, the seller, provided an engaging video showcasing the GTS, contributing to the vehicle's allure.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle’s specifications and modifications. @bunger78 asked if the factory exhaust components were included, to which @911r confirmed they were and mentioned that all factory parts were displayed in the photo gallery. @idbat89 raised questions about the ownership history and modifications from previous owners. The seller shared that Murtha Motorsports did the mods and provided details about the car’s tune and supporting modifications, ensuring that potential buyers had a clear understanding of the vehicle's enhancements.
Negative: Concerns were voiced regarding emissions, particularly from @Rich337 and @Jcbl, who discussed the potential complications with California emissions laws given the modifications made to the GTS. @spokayman sought reassurance about the vehicle passing emissions inspection, highlighting the issues that could arise for buyers in restrictive regions. The uncertainty regarding emissions created a negative undertone in the comments, indicating challenges that potential buyers might face depending on their location.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed appreciation for the vehicle's overall quality, specifically noting its stunning color scheme and good mechanical condition. @RobisonService pointed out that the car is solid mechanically, with most heavy maintenance already performed. The fact that it can still be driven smoothly and comfortably adds to its appeal, as @Jrooney (The Seller) mentioned that it has a watertight convertible top that functions properly. There is a sentiment among some users that this could be a valuable investment opportunity, especially since it is being offered in a no-reserve auction.
Neutral: There have been inquiries regarding the damage to the vehicle, particularly concerning the estimated costs for repairs and the potential title status. @Jrooney (The Seller) has clarified that the damage occurred in different incidents, with the body and top needing repairs that might be substantial but are achievable with the right resources. @RobisonService provided insights on the parts availability issues leading to the car being declared a constructive total loss in discussions about the vehicle's valuation and repair options, emphasizing the rarity of parts for this model.
Negative: On the downside, many comments reveal skepticism about the vehicle's future value and current condition. @gbzausa expressed concern that the car is likely to carry a salvage title despite the seller's assurances. @flyingdago and @tripleblack criticized the potential risks involved in owning such a vehicle, suggesting that it might be better suited as a donor car. Opinions vary on the financial viability of repairing the car, with a consensus that the required work may lead to costly outcomes, especially if hidden damages exist or if the car indeed receives a salvage title in the future.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiastic appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition and significance. @vinipizzetta remarked on its beauty, while @johnnyvett praised the 1981 model's uniqueness, noting its production in two factories and the modern base coat clear coat paint from Bowling Green. @neutronrandy, a member of NCRS and a former Corvette owner, described the car as a fabulous example with pristine red leather seats, evoking fond memories from 35 years ago. @rgfulks also acknowledged the attractiveness of these cars, even if they had lower horsepower.
Neutral: The seller, @Bulletmotorsportsinc, engaged the audience actively, providing information about the auction procedures and encouraging fun discussions without off-topic remarks. They detailed aspects of the auction process, such as viewing appointments and storage fees, while responding constructively to inquiries. This included clarifying the difference between bumper colors and body paint, as well as addressing concerns about engine options. @johnnyvett and others shared insights about the car's paint and production, contributing to a broader understanding of the vehicle's history and characteristics, while correcting misinformation from other commenters.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some comments pointed out perceived flaws with the vehicle. @nikisupreme expressed disappointment that the car lacked the L-82 motor and raised concerns about the bumper colors not matching the body. Other users, including @ryan92987, echoed these concerns, although his comment was flagged as non-constructive. In response, the seller and @johnnyvett explained that such color discrepancies are common due to different materials and aging paint technology, suggesting that the concerns were based on misunderstanding rather than actual issues with the car.
|
Pikes Peak International Hill Climb VIP Ride-Along Experience w/Jeff Zwart for 43 Institute
Lot 236320
Private Party
 |
Positive: There is a lot of enthusiasm surrounding the vehicle experience, especially due to the involvement of @Jeff Zwart, who is well-regarded in the racing community. Commentors like @Ross_Robbins have praised Jeff for his character and skill, while @GravelTrap36 emphasizes the excitement of riding with such a celebrated driver. @boaboyoz highlights the goodness of the cause behind the experience, appreciating that it's linked to the @43Institute, which aims to create opportunities for the next generation. A feeling of anticipation can be felt in comments expressing excitement for the auction and the unique opportunity this experience presents, as mentioned by @jzno11.
Neutral: Several commentors shared their past experiences and anticipation without strong emotional swings, providing insight into the culture surrounding the Pikes Peak event. @Icenoggle reflected on the unique allure of the race despite their hesitance to participate, while @RJ80 remembered a thrilling ride with Jeff Zwart and mentioned how impactful those memories can be. @solitsky asked pertinent questions regarding the tax deductibility of the auction bid, demonstrating both practicality and genuine interest in participation.
Negative: A few comments also reflected apprehension regarding the experience. @Rathertakearide humorously suggested participants prepare for the intensity of the ride, indicating that it could be quite overwhelming. @JHBBII shared a cautionary tale from their Air Force days, warning others against underestimating the potential physical effects of such an exhilarating ride. Similarly, @boaboyoz expressed mock disappointment about missing out on bidding due to other circumstances, hinting that there are mixed feelings about the competition surrounding this unique opportunity.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its exceptional build quality and performance potential. @Iceman06 described it as an 'absolute dream car', while @RiffRaff noted the builder's dedication to the craft. The excitement was palpable, with @WesDuenkel sharing his nostalgia and @Shawh offering enthusiastic remarks about the build. @Tripledigit echoed this sentiment by commenting on the quality of the photos and expressing eagerness for driving videos. Overall, the vehicle was recognized as a classic with a strong appeal among car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments contained inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle’s specifications and registration status. @70Silver and @johnq02 discussed paperwork and potential street legality issues due to the car's race modifications. @FinestVehiclesTraded (The Seller) responded to multiple inquiries regarding engine details, dyno figures, and maintenance history, confirming that the car was not raced on the newly built engine and had been maintained regularly. The dialogue also included discussions about the paint color, with @Thomas54 seeking details and finding it to be Sapphire Blue, indicating an ongoing interest in the specifics of the car's features.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's street legality as a race car. @scott1221 pointed out potential registration issues due to the absence of an odometer and questioned the vehicle's compliance with standard street requirements. @Boots32hotrods critiqued the lack of log books that would typically accompany race cars, emphasizing the importance of formal documentation for safety certifications. Additionally, questions about the engine's required fuel type and the absence of detailed performance metrics raised some doubt among commenters about the car's readiness for both street and race conditions.
|
|
|