Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: Many comments applaud the Rimac Nevera for its stunning design, rarity, and impressive performance capabilities. @boaboyoz describes it as a 'super rare, cool AF' vehicle, while @Dollycat3 provides insight into current pricing, indicating that a new model costs between $2.2 million and $2.5 million. The comments highlight the exclusivity of having a vehicle like this on the auction platform, with @MTH expressing eagerness to bid and @barryf43 appreciating the need for a window sticker for verification. Other users like @FinestVehiclesTraded (The Seller) are also engaging positively, welcoming bids and contributors.
Neutral: Several commenters provide interesting facts about the Rimac Nevera and engage in discussions about its history and auction details. For instance, @zanary notes a connection to The Hamilton Collection, while @HighRowler63 confirms the same, pointing out that this particular model is build number 69. @MWCRLN shares an entertaining personal experience from the unveiling event, and the sentiments shared reflect a blend of curiosity and admiration for the brand's journey and technological advancements. The auction's activity seems lively with lots of engagement, though some still seek more information, like @barryf43 requesting a build sheet.
Negative: On the downside, some comments express skepticism about the vehicle’s practicality and overall automotive purpose. @legatho questions whether it will depreciate significantly like many electric vehicles, and @C5Corvette expresses disappointment over the absence of a manual transmission as a missed opportunity to enhance driving experience. Furthermore, @Raghoser critiques the car as being excessively extravagant and advocates for traditional vehicles over the Nevera's hyper-modern attributes. This sentiment resonates with others like @Mhodds102 who wonder about the purpose of the car beyond its technological status.
 |
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as "insanely beautiful" and a "stunning example." @Diabl07 noted its special design, while @LeWayneF simply stated it was a "beautiful example". @AUDIologist complimented the vehicle's elegant and muscular lines and indicated that seeing it up close was a pleasant surprise regarding its size. Comments reflected excitement as @Mike_Breinin hoped for a driving video, and @81morgan excitedly mentioned looking forward to using it as a semi-retirement car. The vehicle's authenticity and rarity were highlighted by @Jockr, who called it a "Holy Grail Alfa," and @boaboyoz found it "bad a$ and seriously cool."
Neutral: Several comments highlighted the specifics of the vehicle's production and racing history, acknowledging both its pedigree and the modifications it has undergone. @nickdoc and @Watry engaged in discussions about past auctions, while @Drdjet shared personal anecdotes about a related car. The reception of the vehicle's RHD configuration drew mixed reactions, with @Watry and @Jockr noting the adaptability required for RHD driving in the US. @HPLM and @MaranelloSportsUSA (The Seller) added to the technical discussion about the vehicle's construction and performance characteristics, emphasizing its rarity and place in racing history.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about authenticity and restoration quality. @mnsty criticized the trend of vehicles being presented as restored while missing original components, questioning the overall restoration quality. @MANDREWS expressed worries about owning a car that might no longer retain its original parts. @Alfina pointed out specific non-original components found in the vehicle, prompting discussions about the importance of originality in classic cars. Furthermore, @EmojiCowboy pessimistically noted that the vehicle might not meet its selling price, indicating a challenging market for such collector items.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters widely appreciate the vehicle's stunning aesthetics and classic features. @70_duster and @carbonphysicsguy both compliment the photography, while @Clyderomero calls it a classic Ferrari with a gorgeous color combination. @mike_747 reminisces fondly about his own experience with a similar model, emphasizing its beauty and charm. The seller, @FantasyJunction, highlights the car's glorious V12 engine, manual transmission, and beautiful Pininfarina body lines, noting it as an example of Italian passion in automotive design. Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle's state and general appeal, considering it a delightful entry into the world of classic Ferraris.
Neutral: The seller, @FantasyJunction, provides detailed information about the car's history, previous ownership, and maintenance. They mention that the vehicle was originally a Canadian delivery and highlight the changes made over time, including the installation of a new clutch assembly and mufflers. @Fleche_dOr raises a point about the microphone placement in driving videos, showing interest in capturing the true driving experience. Another commenter, @BenG, queries about the switch cluster in the steering column, indicating that it may not be original to the car but is not concerned with its effect on performance. This reflects a balanced view of the vehicle, recognizing both its charm and quirks.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns over specific modifications and the vehicle's history. @DingoDaveo inquires about potential asbestos content in older car parts, suggesting concerns related to safety and regulations. @GlennB mentions that the switchgear modification may impact the car's value in a judging context, implying that it detracts from the car's originality. @lbdave questions the seller's reasons for selling the car after a short period, hinting at possible negative motivations behind the sale. Overall, while the car garners admiration, the modifications and uncertainties in ownership raise some eyebrows among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight a strong appreciation for the vehicle, with many expressing awe at its condition and history. @BGMotorsports refers to it as a 'wonderful time capsule,' while @mark2121 and @gmmuscleusa praised its beauty and the allure of the turbocharged performance. Commenters like @racelance and @CC350 share personal connections to the car, with @racelance noting the exceptional looks and the raw, analog feel of the car, indicating it has everything sought after by enthusiasts. Furthermore, several commenters, including @AdamsPolishes, assert that it is one of the best examples they have ever seen, showcasing the car's well-maintained history and pristine condition.
Neutral: Some comments provided additional context around the vehicle's specifications and history. @HPLM pointed out that by 1986, turbo lag was less of an issue compared to earlier models, a detail echoed by others who shared their own experiences. @Desertautosport (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the car's history and provided explanations about original equipment including the wheels and tires. Other commenters shared anecdotes related to their own car experiences and how they relate to this specific Porsche, such as @Newton2022 reminiscing about their previous car while commenting on the Porsche's aesthetics, suggesting a connection to nostalgia for enthusiasts not just focused on this specific model.
Negative: There were a few questionable points raised in the comments, particularly regarding the car's turbo lag, with @roberto expressing concerns about the driving experience, especially on a racetrack. Additionally, inquiries about past repairs surfaced, such as @pk7215's query about the front left fender repair and @CamiloRodrigues' repeated questions regarding the air conditioning functionality. @Desertautosport (The Seller) addressed these concerns directly, which indicates some dissatisfaction from potential bidders about clarity on the vehicle’s history, but they were met with seller clarification offering transparency.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's stunning aesthetics and high-quality features. @boaboyoz expresses admiration for the 'Azzurro Dino amazingness' of the F8 Spider, while @BobbyZZZ and @812GTSowner compliment the gorgeous color and solid specifications. @AllanMarshall18915 finds the car amazing and is looking forward to the bidding, further reiterating the overall appeal among viewers. The interior details, including carbon seats mentioned by @yellowferrari77, have also been acknowledged as hard to find, accentuating the car's allure.
Neutral: Several inquiries about specific features have been made, such as @ctalisman's request for the original window sticker and @HAD asking about the front lift option. @hyebidder raised questions about the installation of PPF and paint work, while @technom3 provided commentary on the necessity of a front lift, suggesting it may not be as crucial as others believe. @Naples_Motorsports (The Seller) provided clarifications on the car's specifications, confirming the absence of a front lift and confirming that PPF is installed on certain parts, which may influence potential buyers' decisions.
Negative: Some negatives surfaced regarding the lack of specific features, particularly the absence of the front lift option, which @HAD pointed out and @812GTSowner elaborated on, noting its importance for many buyers. @technom3's comment might downplay the lift requirement, potentially frustrating others who have a different viewpoint as expressed by @812GTSowner. Additionally, the unavailability of the original MSRP has been a point of concern for potential bidders, as highlighted by multiple commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's stunning design and performance. @nexusautobrokers noted the vehicle's impressive mileage, while @kylehanslovan shared their excitement about driving a similar model, calling the car amazing. @JWHBOOMER also contributed positively, mentioning the desirability and rarity of manual supercars, and complimenting the vehicle's appearance. Overall, the car received much praise from users for its impressive specifications and aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Some comments were informational, with @GT35065 suggesting that providing documentation for the AC work could benefit potential buyers. @SpikeNSX inquired if the seller was interested in selling the car outright. @LawDog asked various questions about the vehicle's maintenance history, clutch wear, and the PPF installation, indicating a concern for the vehicle's overall condition but without expressing a negative sentiment. The seller, @ikigai8, responded to several inquiries, providing details on the vehicle's features and maintenance, which showed a willingness to cooperate and clarify concerns.
Negative: There were a few comments that pointed out potential issues with the vehicle. @swaggityswooty questioned the condition of the road rash on the passenger skirt, while @hari-bhari raised concerns about possible blemishes underneath the PPF. @mamazcookn mentioned a loose leather panel on the driver's side, further adding to the concerns about the car's condition. @LawDog also requested comprehensive documentation and insight into various maintenance aspects, including clutch wear and signs of Mag Ride issues, highlighting the need for verification regarding the car's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the car's appearance, with @JoePanozster exclaiming that it "Looks great!!!" and @Flatman73 describing it as a "Beautiful car!" @wanna911targa complimented the organization of the sale and noted the car's beautiful design, highlighting its excellent presentation. Overall, the vehicle has been well-received, with users expressing their admiration for the car's unique color and classic elements, with @Al_Cantara stating it has many original elements and is a "Cool color" that will do well.
Neutral: Some commenters raised informative questions about the car's historical details and technical specifications. @dchunk911 inquired whether the paint was original, and @Terra requested details about the actual mileage, compression, and leak-down tests. @Caymanorcarrera brought up the condition of various components, showing curiosity about the car's history as a project. Meanwhile, @AlpineJay and @DugDeutsch provided technical clarifications regarding the engine's specifications and setup, which led to in-depth discussions regarding the car's mechanical components and potential modifications.
Negative: Concerns were expressed regarding inconsistencies in the vehicle's details. Multiple users discussed the engine modifications, suggesting that some components may not be original or may have been replaced with parts from later versions, raising doubts about the current configuration of the engine. @kvb968 pointed out potential rust issues, while @HarryFD mentioned discrepancies in the car's repainting history. Furthermore, several commenters, including @DugDeutsch and @PeteK, pointed out possible inaccuracies about the engine setup and raised concerns over missing historical information about the modifications made, questioning the overall originality and value of the vehicle.
|
1,500-Mile 2022 Ford F-350 Super Duty XLT “Supershorty” 7.3L 4×4
1FDRF3FN0NED74334
Lot 237581
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its impressive build quality and aesthetics. @mick59 noted the 'great configuration' and 'impressive' appearance, while @Discobob referred to the truck as 'cool'. @EpicBroncos emphasized its visual appeal, stating it attracts significant attention when driving. @TheMundane was also impressed, mentioning the meticulous attention to detail in the build and the high-quality components. Additionally, @Eman2516 shared positive experiences with a similar vehicle, indicating it rides better than any Super Duty available and functions flawlessly.
Neutral: Several comments included inquiries and clarifications regarding specifics of the vehicle's features. @bhardiman asked about the lack of descriptions on the invoice, which @Mcguireman addressed by explaining the redaction of parts details for competitive reasons. @SVXRide inquired about the engine's RPMs at cruising speed and towing capacity, which @Mcguireman provided information on, including a detailed towing experience from a previous sale. Other inquiries related to concerns about potential transmission issues and accident history were met with reassurances from @Mcguireman, explaining the vehicle had no major problems apart from minor hail damage that was repaired.
Negative: Some comments reflected criticism regarding aspects of the auction process. For instance, @BBKC questioned the decision to black out significant parts of the build invoice, suggesting a lack of transparency. @JustMe1 expressed concern over conflicting information in the Carfax report about the vehicle's accident history. Additionally, @cwsteel faced backlash for what was perceived as non-constructive criticism, indicating some discord among commenters about the auction's authenticity. Such negative sentiments highlighted concerns about transparency and clarity in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: There are many favorable comments about the 1986 Porsche 944 being sold by @1600veloce. @GDogg praised the vehicle for its fantastic color combination and low mileage, while @lbpa18 highlighted it as a beautiful example of the model. @Harbormotorcars noted the increasing desirability of the 944, emphasizing its performance and design compared to other contemporaries. The low mileage and excellent condition of the car, commented on by users like @Caymanorcarrera and @SixteenVentiler, also contribute to its appeal as a unique find in the current market.
Neutral: Several commentors express a mix of curiosity and inquiries regarding the vehicle. @Gadget1213 is nearby and wants to see the car in person, while @aitalam raises concerns about the air conditioning system, noting that repairs may be necessary. @jmforgey provided context regarding the car's climate usage and maintenance history, explaining that low mileage may contribute to A/C issues. Other users like @Nocarleftbehind and @Spokayman speculate on potential repairs needed but still acknowledge the rarity of the model, indicating it’s still a worthwhile opportunity for potential buyers.
Negative: However, there are concerns about the condition of certain components, particularly the A/C system. @aitalam expressed surprise that the A/C had not been diagnosed or repaired, indicating this could point to larger issues. @Spokayman and @Nocarleftbehind elaborated on this, suggesting that a simple recharge might not address an underlying problem, which could involve more extensive repairs. Despite these concerns, users recognize the car’s rarity and potential value, indicating a willingness to overlook minor issues for a chance to own a well-preserved 944.
|
 |
Positive: @WebsterMotorCo (The Seller) highlights the impressive attributes of the 2003 Bourget Fat Daddy, noting its status as an original owner vehicle with only 2,500 miles. The exceptional engineering is praised, particularly the unique built-in oil fill cap integrated into the frame, which is a signature feature of Bourget motorcycles. Additionally, the bike's paint and chrome are described as looking fantastic, enhancing its appeal as a classic motorcycle that is in excellent condition and ready for a new owner.
Neutral: Commenters have shown curiosity about specific details regarding the vehicle. @Carman82 inquired about the tires, specifically if they are original and requested the date code. In response, @WebsterMotorCo (The Seller) clarified that the rear tire was replaced in 2023, while the front tire is original. @LRandy also expressed interest, asking if a video of the bike running could be made available, looking to capture the authentic sound of the motorcycle.
Negative: There are no negative comments reflected in the feedback regarding this vehicle. The auction seems to have generated interest without any negative remarks or concerns from bidders or commentators.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the car's aesthetics, particularly praising its Speed Yellow color and the combination with the Aerokit. @Srk14105 noted the impressive look of the Aerokit, while @Jwslaw stated that the car is indeed a looker. Many commenters, including @LoudNotFast and @01996tt, highlighted the car's eye-catching appearance, indicating that it would attract attention at car shows and is simply beautiful, further showcasing the high regard for its exterior design.
Neutral: The seller, @Garage44, provided detailed responses to inquiries about the car's specifications, maintenance history, and modifications. They clarified the nature of the modifications made to the car, including the GT3 vent added by the current owner and features of the factory Aerokit. @Muvovr raised a question regarding the minor oil drip from the rear main seal, which @Garage44 explained as a small seep rather than an active leak, asserting the decision to leave it unaddressed was made for transparency.
Negative: Several commenters voiced concerns about the vehicle's maintenance status and potential expenses for the next owner. @Muvovr and @omi205 questioned the decision to not repair the minor oil seep and commented on potential costs associated with the rear main seal. Additionally, @milamookie pointed out that the Carfax report lacked maintenance records since 2017, prompting further queries about any work done during that time. @GrigioF430 also noted the importance of clutch replacement, indicating that concerns about the car’s upkeep are significant for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Targa_Todd expressed eagerness for the car to come back on the market, indicating a strong desire to buy it. @Slam105 remarked on the car's exceptional upgrades and called it a fun ride, showing enthusiasm for the vehicle's cool characteristics. @a410traveler appreciated the car’s overall look and the upgrades to the interior, particularly praising the inclusion of a 5-speed Porsche transmission. @lbpa18 acknowledged the significant work that went into the vehicle, noting that it looks good even if the color might not accurately be Irish Green. @RussR reminisced about the lasting appeal of the car, suggesting that its classic design has endured the test of time well.
Neutral: @911r (The Seller) shared videos showcasing the car and its features, which could aid potential buyers in appreciating the vehicle. @NorCalBert gave a shout-out to those who maintain features like heaters in classic builds and referenced an issue of Hot VWs, suggesting a connection to the car’s history. @DanPinChd, the builder, explained that he aimed to mimic factory quality for the vehicle, clarifying that the paint color appears darker in person. @kingkarmann responded positively to Dan's efforts, sharing a similar philosophy about how he rebuilt his own car and wishing good luck with the auction.
Negative: @Toxicarl shared a personal story of disappointment regarding past vehicles, highlighting his own rust bucket experience compared to the beauty of the car in question. He humorously lamented that he might now be too old to drive such a fun car after wishing his previous projects could resemble the current one. @NaturopathicDoctor raised several concerns about the vehicle's condition, inquiring about the status of the AC components, potential overheating issues, rust presence, and the overall functionality of electronics and cabin heat, indicating skepticism regarding the car's readiness.
|
 |
Positive: @ericmc80 expressed a nostalgic sentiment about the truck, imagining the stories it could tell around a campfire. @cruiserlover complimented the vehicle, indicating it looks well-suited for its environment, suggesting a sense of ruggedness and appropriateness. Additionally, @992Pcar (The Seller) promised to provide more videos showcasing the truck's performance later, aiming to keep potential buyers updated and engaged.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the truck's performance and maintenance issues, like @Hurstolds1442 inquiring about videos of the vehicle running. @PKBAYRIDGE offered a potential solution for a high idle problem, which @Archer84 followed up on by asking about the engine's behavior when warmed up. @992Pcar (The Seller) confirmed the idle issue increases with temperature, indicating a proactive approach to explaining technical concerns.
Negative: Concerns were raised about specific issues, including a malfunctioning left front turn signal, with @crazyjim questioning its status, to which @992Pcar (The Seller) acknowledged there is an issue with the connectors, not the bulb. @Tacoman2820 asked about the head gasket's replacement history, to which @992Pcar (The Seller) confirmed that it has not been replaced, although it is in good condition. These issues may raise questions for potential buyers regarding the truck's overall reliability.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Autobiography, highlighting its stunning SVO Palette Balmoral Blue Ultra Metallic color and luxurious features. @LonghornForever, who has purchased from the seller before, emphasizes the exceptional condition and extensive features of their own vehicle acquired from @Jpreston123. Commenters note the importance of the vehicle's maintenance history, with @Jpreston123 reassuring potential buyers that the car is in top form and showcasing a range of premium options, including advanced infotainment and comfort features.
Neutral: Some remarks bring attention to the service history of the vehicle, with @CigarFred and @LonghornForever questioning the necessity of multiple replacements at only 30,000 miles. @WAGONBOYTD responds by indicating that such maintenance may be typical for a heavy vehicle like the Range Rover, noting the wear on components without casting complete doubt on the quality of the vehicle. @Frayes seeks clarification on the seating configuration, which adds to a technical discussion about the Autobiography trim, demonstrating curiosity among buyers about specific features.
Negative: On the other hand, there are concerns about the extent of repairs suggested by @LonghornForever and @theadamt, who suggest that the vehicle may have been subjected to harsher driving conditions. @LonghornForever expresses skepticism about the original selling conditions if the car were with a less reputable dealer, thereby underlining the importance of trust in the purchase process. Generally, while some comments caution against overthinking concerning service history, they also hint at potential issues that buyers might weigh against the vehicle's appealing features.
|
 |
Positive: @Likeparty appreciates the nice build of the vehicle, highlighting the addition of the water pump and electric starter, noting it as user-friendly in modern times. @FUBAR1 finds the turtle back body and enhancements like the starter and Ruckstell very desirable, indicating that owning a Model T offers a unique experience. @MitchHungLynch describes the vehicle as a jewel with incredible history, commending its decades-long family ownership and wishing the seller and bidders the best of luck.
Neutral: @Ferdnerd27 (The Seller) engages with potential buyers by acknowledging the water pump's usefulness for parades and responding to inquiries about the spark plugs. @Edzui raises a question about the back spark plug's positioning, while @Rweiss6 expresses interest in learning about Model Ts before purchasing. The seller clarifies the spark plug positions and explains the function of the installed train whistle, addressing the curiosities posed by other commenters.
Negative: Some comments manage to express concerns or uncertainties, with @Edzui questioning the spark plug's height and @Rweiss6 mentioning potential missetup regarding the train whistle installation. @modes questions whether the vehicle is originally a TT due to its modifications. These inquiries show that while there is interest, there are also valid points of consideration regarding the vehicle's setup and specifications.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters applaud the vehicle, particularly highlighting its construction and handling capabilities. @spyboy remarks on the great sound and condition of the rig, while @SDCR describes it as a superbly set up sidecar rig with power steering-like handling thanks to its leading link. @KidShelleen expresses a positive sentiment, considering EML rigs among the best available, citing their history of ownership and experiences with multiple sidecars, reinforcing the vehicle's reputation for quality.
Neutral: Comments reveal technical clarifications and inquiries about the bike's features and specifications. @Txrider (The Seller) provides details about the bike's modifications, explaining the inclusion of RS fairings and the absence of a kickstarter or clutch slave cylinder. @flattwin69 questions the specifics of the motor, and @Annoyed brings attention to the frame construction methodologies of EML versus BMW, leading to further clarifications about the frame's integrity and design from the seller.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the bike's features and potential discrepancies. @Annoyed raises an issue about how the conversion frame was manufactured, suggesting that the original frame may not be fully compliant with EML conversion standards. Additionally, there are doubts from various commenters about certain modifications, including the operation of brake pedals and adjustments made during the rig's construction, indicating a need for attention to detail that might not satisfy every potential buyer.
|
 |
Positive: @90IROC has presented the 40th Anniversary Corvette in a very clean and well-documented manner, highlighting its low mileage and originality. Commenters have expressed admiration for the car's red on red color scheme and its overall appearance, with @Doooooooomy calling it great looking. @MHHamrhead praised the detailing work on the undercarriage, indicating that for a 33-year-old car, its condition is exceptional. Many comments reflect a positive interest in the auction, with participants enthusiastic about placing bids and acknowledging the thorough presentation of the vehicle.
Neutral: A number of commenters engaged in discussions around the car's details, such as its ownership history, maintenance inquiries, and originality. @MWebb requested clarification on any issues with the car beyond the known problem with the power antenna, which @90IROC addressed with further information about the car's condition and functionality. There were also discussions about the specifics of the vehicle options and the Corvette's historical significance, including the uniqueness of the 40th Anniversary model compared to standard variants and the detailing undertaken for the auction.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's age and the lack of a comprehensive maintenance history available through Carfax, leading some to describe the vehicle as a 'pig-in-a-poke'. @bobr85 and @aaronace explicitly expressed uncertainty regarding potential hidden issues, reflective of common worries when purchasing older vehicles with limited service records. Additionally, there was skepticism about the functionality of the vehicle's systems, such as the key fob and the power seats, with several commenters hoping for clearer affirmation of full operational status before deciding to bid.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the vehicle, particularly its stunning appearance and color. @Dollycat3 notes the 'absolutely stunning and exceptional' design and captures the sentiment shared by others, with @gord6 expressing love for the color combination. The car's rarity is highlighted by @thunderbirdsnw, who points out that this 1958 T-Bird convertible is an incredibly rare example, having seen only a few in over 25 years of judging car shows. Furthermore, @fka_ray appreciates the modern aesthetic of the car, attributing its unique standing in the vintage car market to its design and build quality.
Neutral: Discussions among commenters also focus on technical aspects and specifics about the vehicle. @Noisyboyz raises a question regarding the complex power top, prompting @Billmahle (The Seller) to provide a clear explanation of its operation. Commenters like @TJClassic and @VanSman express curiosity about additional history and documentation for the car, with @Billmahle responding to these inquiries about the vehicle's background and condition. There is a request for a video showing the process of lowering and raising the top, reflecting an interest in understanding the car's features further.
Negative: Some concerns regarding the vehicle have been raised, primarily about the absence of fender skirts. @TJClassic challenges the seller regarding the skirts' omission, pointing out that the car should not be categorized as a 'roadster' without them. There's skepticism as to whether the skirts fit properly, with @333window suggesting that their non-installation might indicate underlying body repair issues. Additionally, commenters like @nod_67 express dissatisfaction with delivery costs, highlighting a common frustration in classic car transactions.
|
 |
Positive: @Jeffers-GB (The Seller) expresses his love for the car's incredible performance, beautiful looks, and the compliments he receives about it. He mentions that it makes an amazing noise and considers it a future classic due to Jaguar stopping production of such vehicles. @Chuchip comments on the car's gorgeous appearance, comfortable interior, and the thrilling thrust of the engine, emphasizing its great color combination and wheel selection. @DirtySky appreciates the seller's communication and transparency, praising the car as a wonderful example of the F-Type.
Neutral: @Jeffers-GB (The Seller) shares updates regarding the car's condition, including a mechanical assessment scheduled with Jaguar and recent wheel refinishing for sale preparation. He acknowledges questions about the vehicle's features like tires and roof color, providing explanations and examples of maintenance performed, such as brake service and tire checks. Other commenters like @Boiler and @mduel86 inquire about various aspects of the vehicle, showing interest in the tire types and potential undercarriage issues while @PilotG1 asks for more clarity about the vehicle's under-the-hood condition and any concerns regarding rust.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's maintenance, particularly regarding the need for rear brakes at such low mileage, with @Majorohio questioning the wear pattern. Additionally, @mduel86 brings up a potentially troubling history of front-end damage, use of winter tires, and an incorrect roof color, which could imply neglect. @PilotG1 expresses worry about the cleanliness of the engine compartment, raising doubts about potential rust or damages visible in the undercarriage photos.
|
 |
Positive: @HealeyRick mentions that the Healey is good looking and appreciates the black wire wheels, suggesting they suit the car well. He also finds the integration of the air conditioning impressive, highlighting its practicality when using a hardtop. @GBRBiLL expresses his surprise at how appealing the car looks in person despite his initial reservations, and feels inspired to work on his own Healey project. @pperros reminisces fondly about a past Healey experience and admires the restoration quality of this vehicle, while also inquiring about the air conditioning's effectiveness.
Neutral: @Tibor2 (The Seller) provides detailed information about the maintenance and parts of the Healey, stating it runs on high-test pure gas and uses Valvoline VR1 oil. He responds to inquiries regarding the hardtop, clarifying that it is factory-made and explaining the cooling capabilities of the installed Vintage Air system. @1SRH and @pastrapper both ask practical questions about the paint type and frame integrity, with Tibor addressing concerns regarding the frame's condition while assuring it is aligned and has no structural issues.
Negative: @jturk raises concerns about the front frame crossmember, implying it might have sustained significant damage. @rjr59AH observes unusual behavior from the fuel gauge and questionable sounds when downshifting, which may indicate mechanical issues. @rx_jagetc points out that assembling the hardtop requires familiarity and skill, implying it could pose challenges for someone without experience, and @pastrapper expresses that he might need to hire a shop to reassemble it due to these concerns.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and overall presentation. @LaserGuru1948 praises the listing for being "very well presented," while @bmwm3tz describes it as a "nice looking example." @boaboyoz adds to this sentiment by calling it a "killer Cali 991.2 GT3" and an "exquisite example" in an appealing color, Racing Yellow. Other commenters, like @blacknyellow, also recognize the car as a "work of art," further emphasizing its visual appeal, which resonates well with potential buyers. Overall, there is excitement and enthusiasm in the discussions surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specific aspects of the vehicle regarding its features and purchase details. @Motorenn (The Seller) clarifies concerns by detailing the history of service records, explaining that while previous records aren’t available, a Carfax report shows past services. Additionally, he mentions that the original window sticker is not available, but a Monroney label with options is provided. @EddieB. inquires about the condition of the tires, while @Best_Of_Show is curious about the vehicle's ability to pass California smog tests and any potential body blemishes, which @Motorenn reassures there are none. This indicates a desire for transparency and thoroughness in the transaction process.
Negative: Some comments bring attention to potential issues with the vehicle. @EddieB. points out that the "lower underside edge of the chin spoiler has been chewed up" and suggests it may need replacement, highlighting a notable concern. Furthermore, comments about the vehicle having six previous owners from @motormark49 raise questions about the car's longevity with previous owners. @GruppeC956 notes that while the 991 GT3 is currently rarer than the 992 GT3, the fluctuation in availability might affect value perception. Finally, @porsche1986 expresses disappointment that the vehicle is not a manual transmission, indicating a preference that may limit appeal for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its appealing aspects, with @KBarb describing it as a 'cool rig' and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Scott9216 notes the vehicle appears to be in great shape, asking for maintenance details, while @Signs318 praises it as 'clean', suggesting it has not been used commercially but perhaps as a standby vehicle for a volunteer organization. @KC_Car_Guy calls it an 'absolute cherry', and @Chuckanderson shares personal anecdotes about using the rig as a party vehicle and enjoying time spent with family driving it.
Neutral: Several questions from commenters about the vehicle's specifications show interest in its functionality, with @OldChuckwalla asking for dimensions, specifically the floor-to-ceiling height. @Deano2112 inquires about the 4WD capability, urging clarity due to past experiences with similar vehicles. There are also questions regarding the care of the vehicle, including @PhilInAthens asking about the engine hours and @garddt requesting back door dimensions, which @Chuckanderson, the seller, provides in detail, further clarifying concerns of rust due to its original use in Nebraska.
Negative: Some negative comments raise concerns about the vehicle's condition and functionality. @elly18 questions how a low-mileage truck could be rusty underneath, while @Deano2112 seeks reassurance on the 4WD capability, reflecting skepticism about past experiences with similar vehicles. Additionally, questions from @LowestBidder0001 regarding the ability to pull a trailer highlight concerns about the vehicle's practical use due to its ambulance build, pointing towards a perceived limitation in its versatility. Overall, while enthusiasm is evident, doubts about certain functionalities and condition remain.
|
 |
Positive: @Carbine123 compliments the vehicle's color combination as perfect and period correct, expressing good wishes for the auction. @SpecWerksLTD, the seller, describes the R107 560SL as stunning and emphasizes its reliability and suitability for daily driving, encouraging buyers to watch the auction for upcoming content on the car. @Franjzava appreciates the car's appearance and shows curiosity about the timing chain, to which the seller reassures that it runs well without any noise, hinting at its reliable construction.
Neutral: @HDWalt finds the chrome wheel well trim somewhat perplexing, attributing it to a period-specific preference. @Schmade raises a question regarding the quick sale of the car after its recent purchase, mentioning a lack of understanding behind such a swift decision. @PolarFBear provides a mixed review, noting that while the car may be stylish, it is uncomfortable for taller individuals, yet acknowledges its solid build and expresses skepticism about its repair costs. @Kwic shares a positive sentiment about the Euro headlights but wishes for the inclusion of Euro bumpers, indicating a desire for further enhancements.
Negative: @PolarFBear expresses discomfort with the vehicle's size for taller drivers, highlighting the lack of space in the driver's area and referring to the car as expensive to repair. @JWINTER72 requests additional visual content to better appreciate the car's paint color and driving characteristics, which may imply a lack of confidence in its presentation. @1150EML critiques an included article comparison between the vehicle and the Allante as having aged poorly, which suggests possible concerns about the car's perceived value or reputation in relation to similar models.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous commenters expressed admiration for the stunning Meissen Blue color of the 2012 Audi R8 GT, highlighting it as a standout feature that contributes to the car's desirability. @TGE89 called it a beauty, @DNW4670 noted the car's unique color and attractive appearance, while @HPAutosource commented on its nice ride quality. Many, such as @smb127 and @LotusSutra, appreciated the $4500 exclusive option for the color, underscoring its value. @Beastly and @nexusautobrokers added to the compliments, emphasizing the car's sexy design and the visual appeal of the Meissen Blau color. Additionally, there are detailed acknowledgments about the vehicle's rarity and potential value increases in the market, with commenters suggesting it's a prime candidate for an investment.
Neutral: Some participants engaged in discussions about the specifics of the vehicle in terms of production numbers, unique features, and potential modifications. @Third_Pedal provided insights on the limited production of GT coupes in various colors, while @RNLabas shared extensive details about the specifications and features that make the original R8 GT unique among its peers. Comparisons to other colors and models were also made, indicating a knowledgeable interest in the car's history and performance. @mmaturo expressed a nostalgic connection to similar vehicles and discussed the rarity of the car, while users discussed potential modifications, like a manual transmission swap, indicating a balance between appreciation and the driving experience.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, a few commenters brought up some concerns regarding potential red flags. @mmaturo mentioned the need for clarification about touch-ups on the car's body, questioning the details of previous repairs, particularly related to the hood and fender. While discussing the transmission, @MattsMistakes46 inquired about the performance of the auto transmission on the Gen 1 models, stating their awkwardness at low speeds, which @StickyMike confirmed, suggesting that the R-Tronic might not appeal to everyone. Additionally, @BubblesPBG raised questions about the undercarriage, pointing out that it looked different from a previously owned 2012 R8, indicating that prospective buyers should verify the car's condition thoroughly.
|
 |
Positive: @joe.stephenson remarked that the headlight design of the vehicle is becoming iconic, while @CKart expressed that the pre-facelift D4 is the best A8 ever made, showcasing a strong appreciation for the model. @TriplePPP praised the car and thanked the seller for the great photos and information provided about the vehicle. Overall, there seems to be a lot of admiration for the A8L's design, comfort, and appeal as a luxury vehicle, especially in the context of modern commuting and road trips.
Neutral: @GattoVeloce (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle, indicating their willingness to answer questions from potential buyers and ensuring transparency in the sale process. They clarified that the vehicle has received great maintenance and provided details on its features, such as the heated steering wheel button and DEF servicing, responding thoughtfully to inquiries from bidders like @waytoomanycarsshesays and @Chromantix about various aspects of the car's condition and history. This highlights a proactive approach to customer service in assisting prospective buyers before the auction ends.
Negative: Some comments surfaced minor concerns about the car's condition, such as @Chromantix questioning the appearance of possible staining or dirt in specific images. @TriplePPP pointed out scuffs or dirt on the interior door panels and glove box, suggesting that a deeper clean might be necessary. Furthermore, @waytoomanycarsshesays inquired about the vehicle's cabin odors and smoking history, indicating apprehension regarding its condition despite the seller's assurances that it is a non-smoking vehicle with no odors.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters shared their admiration for the E46 M3, particularly praising its stunning Laguna Seca Blue color and engaging driving experience. @mfarrington001 highlighted the impressive number of photographs available for the auction, while @70_duster expressed a preference for BMW colors, describing it as his favorite. Enthusiasts like @captain_texas and @Tripledigit echoed similar sentiments, commending both the aesthetic appeal and magical transmission combination of the car. Commenter @kdevry, who had previously purchased from the seller, praised the seller as awesome, contributing to the overall positive impression of the vehicle. Additionally, @stradanera, as the seller, provided thorough and detailed information about the car's meticulous upkeep and enhancements, which garnered trust among potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments in the discussion raised valid questions regarding the vehicle's condition and previous work done. @MyWifeWillBeMad inquired about the status of the Big 3 service, which the seller confirmed had not been performed but assured there were no idling issues. @pradoiu sought clarification regarding the paintwork done, and the seller promptly explained the extent of the repairs and reassured potential bidders about the car's excellent condition. Commenter @baf asked for details about the inoperative rear speaker, to which the seller responded that they believed it was a speaker issue and reassured that the majority of the sound system was in working order. Overall, these inquiries reflect a thoughtful consideration of the vehicle's integrity and the seller's transparency.
Negative: Conversely, some comments reflected skepticism regarding certain aspects of the car's condition. @becausejasonwastaken expressed concern about the absence of cats in one of the car's photographs, questioning whether this affected the vehicle's smog certification in California. While the seller assured all necessary checks were satisfied and passed, some commentors remained wary. Additionally, @funkkadelic mentioned possible wiring issues related to the rear speaker, highlighting a potential area of concern. @Skyman81 brought up the price disparity between this vehicle and lower-mile E46 M3s, hinting at a nuanced debate around valuation that may deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Zia66965 praises the Jeep for its aftermarket Brown Soft Top, stating that it looks much different and better. @KeriToll (The Seller) confirms this sentiment, indicating that it gives a good vibe. @JP455 admires the Alcoa wheels and appreciates the effort put into keeping them polished. @TristanvG enjoys the fact that the owners have taken the Jeep out and enjoyed it, showing it has been well-loved. The vehicle is noted to be a rare 65th anniversary model, which has drawn attention and compliments from the sellers.
Neutral: @Dleebr raises a question about the AC repairs, to which @KeriToll (The Seller) responds that the AC is working properly. Another commenter, @Adam54, inquires about any rust, and @KeriToll states there is no rust present. The seller also shares that they will upload additional pictures soon and has answered several specific questions regarding the vehicle’s features and condition, demonstrating a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: @Dleebr expresses concern over the frequency of AC refrigerant charges shown in the Carfax report, leading to questions about potential leaks. @timmclean initially questions the change from a black top seen in a previous auction but later retracts their comment after finding the answer. Additionally, there is some speculation about the automatic shipping calculator being disabled, leading to inquiries from @Zachgrif, although this does not seem to directly affect the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the Knight XV as a "MONSTER" and extremely good-looking, highlighting its impressive aesthetics and cool factor. @mcmcphail17 noted that this particular model offers a much better interior compared to a previous one sold, adding that it is a rare find with low mileage. @Kustomkat1950 expressed admiration for the truck while joking about wanting more features, showing excitement about the vehicle in general. Many commenters shared their enthusiasm about the vehicle's potential, suggesting it would be a fun and attention-grabbing buy.
Neutral: @celticcross inquired about the vehicle's weight, which @BlueChipServices (The Seller) clarified to be around 14,100 lbs. @kevingd asked for details about the tablet control system in the back, seeking clarity on its functionality and any service history regarding the vehicle. @mcmcphail17 provided insights about the vehicle's chassis and durability, highlighting its capabilities despite acknowledging that it is not meant for speed. These comments largely focused on technical details and user queries, reflecting a mix of curiosity and practicality.
Negative: @autoautoauto raised concerns regarding safety, expressing unease about the potential for innocents being caught up in the vehicle's intended use. @TheGNAW criticized the absence of a tow hitch on what is typically a powerful truck, indicating disappointment with its features. Some commenters jokingly expressed their desire for unrealistic accessories such as weapons and smoke machines, including @Thunderpony questioning the inclusion of military-grade features, which may detract from the serious nature of the vehicle's purpose.
|
 |
Positive: @Asdspeed assures everyone that the SF90 Stradale has been meticulously maintained by its original owner and is in excellent condition with no issues reported. The car includes confirmation of a maintenance program valid until November 2028, showcasing its readiness for a new owner. Commenters like @jeffcap64 and @boaboyoz express admiration for the car's beauty and performance, indicating it's truly a remarkable specimen. @Asdspeed encourages potential buyers to view the vehicle in person and highlights its stunning Grigio Silver color as an opportunity not to be missed.
Neutral: Several commenters acknowledge the car’s mileage of 19K and inquire about potential concerns regarding the passenger seat stitching and dash rattle. @Mrodger raises questions about the warranty status and any liens on the car. @Asdspeed responds promptly, confirming that the stitching has been inspected and deemed fine, and reassures that no liens exist. Additionally, the maintenance warranty remains active, providing some comfort to interested buyers about the car's overall condition and service history.
Negative: Some concerns have been expressed regarding the SF90 Stradale's mileage and its current lack of warranty coverage, as noted by @Mrodger. There's also mention of potential issues with the stitching on the passenger seat and a dash rattle, which seemed unresolved during initial inspections. Other commenters wonder about paint history and possible repairs, indicating that while the car is well-maintained, some uncertainties might put off potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Comments from @Bob1228 highlight that the vehicle has several appealing features for potential buyers. The inclusion of a COBB Accessport and K&N air filter adds performance credibility, with the K&N filter confirmed as a drop-in replacement. @Bob1228 also reassures buyers that the Accessport comes with the car, and it runs a stock stage one tune, which simplifies tuning considerations for new owners. Additionally, he notes that the vehicle has received consistent and responsible maintenance, utilizing full synthetic oil and adhering to a 3-4K oil change interval, thus ensuring engine longevity.
Neutral: Various inquiries about the vehicle have been raised by @dyschlee, showcasing a proactive interest in understanding the car's modifications and maintenance history. Questions include the mileage on suspension components, whether the vehicle has a lien, and details about tire performance and alignment services. @Bob1228 addresses these queries, confirming the Faction Fab coilovers and Michelin Pilot Sports tires have approximately 6K miles, while clarifying tire rotation frequencies and the alignment status. These thorough interactions reflect a serious consideration from potential buyers regarding the car's overall state and reliability.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's horn malfunction, as noted by @ericjwi, prompting @Bob1228 to explain that I spotlight potential issues with either a relay or the clock spring rather than a critical failure. However, this kind of functional issue could detract from buyer confidence, emphasizing the need for thorough inspections. Furthermore, additional questions from @dyschlee concerning the racing bar and harnesses, alongside mileage spent on the track, hint at a possible performance-oriented history of the car which may raise questions about wear and tear from previous use.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique Nero interior paired with Rosso Corsa exterior as a visually stunning combination. @PanteraMike74 noted that it’s rare to find this specification, suggesting that it was likely designed for someone who enjoys driving without the worry of a light interior. @alfriedesq echoed this sentiment by calling the car stunning and one of their favorite Ferraris. Additionally, @Engeljizzle shared their perspective after looking at the car in person, emphasizing its beauty and condition, further supporting the positive reception of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters requested additional information about the car's service history and features, indicating a desire for transparency before making a bid. @Slick1964 and @CarGuyTexas911 asked questions regarding maintenance performed and specifics about the front axle lift feature. @iLussoOC (The Seller) assured everyone that they would provide more details and photographs soon. There was also a discussion about the utility of front and rear sensors versus a reversing camera, with @amard asserting that the sensors are more valuable for driving situations, reflecting a balanced view on functional aspects of the car.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's missing features, notably a front axle lift, with commenters like @Pizzadude2010 pointing out that the lack of certain photos led to assumptions about this feature. @BFPD1 mentioned potential sticky button issues, a common maintenance concern for Ferraris. @Mferruggia expressed disappointment that the car did not include a reversing camera, which they felt was an expected technology in a car of this price range. The seller, @iLussoOC, faced scrutiny regarding documentation and service records, with @notsorossa questioning the absence of complete maintenance history, leading to some skepticism among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The 2001 Porsche Boxster S being auctioned by @Collectibleclassics is celebrated for its well-maintained condition and the extensive service history that comes with it. @Collectibleclassics has highlighted their commitment to transparency in transactions and the pride they take in sourcing unique vehicles from private sellers. With a commendable Google Reviews rating of 4.8/5.0, potential buyers can feel confident in the dealership's reliability. The car's maintenance is reported to be up-to-date, making it an attractive option for enthusiasts. The combination of the car's aesthetic and the praises from previous owners add to its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed curiosity about the IMS bearing solution performed on the vehicle, with @BothOUSOONER questioning whether a retrofit kit was used or if a full replacement occurred. @LenLanetti brought up concerns regarding the age of components, inquiring about possible replacements of the Air Oil Separator and hoses due to low mileage since 2017. Questions about the car's interior color and condition were raised by @Craig66, seeking clarification on whether the grey leather was a factory option or an aftermarket addition, as well as inquiring about the window and seals.
Negative: However, some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's potentially high maintenance costs. @NewUpper pointed out the expensive services associated with certain luxury cars, while @valiantjim reminisced about his past ownership of a Boxster and the financial implications associated with them. Additionally, @Dbdbox2000 and @derpetty's inquiries about the IMS bearing date and the lock lugs suggest a cautious approach to the car's history and components, raising questions about their reliability and longevity.
|
 |
Positive: There are several positive comments regarding the vehicle's desirability and aesthetics. @GTamburrino highlighted its quality among Mondials, noting it could be one of the finest available, while also mentioning the seller's reputation as a mark of confirmation. @LongDucDong expressed personal regret for previously labeling these vehicles as unattractive, reflecting on the evolving appreciation for the Mondial's design within the context of modern Ferraris. Additionally, @DikoSulahian called the car 'such a sexy car!!!', which further emphasizes its appeal.
Neutral: A neutral discussion point is the ambiguity surrounding the vehicle's odometer readings and service records. @Hjabsheh1973 requested clarification from the seller regarding potential rollback issues and sought information on service records. In response, @silverarrowcarsltd acknowledged confusion about the mileage based on the Carfax report but corrected the misunderstanding about kilometers versus miles. The interactions show a mix of interest and concern among potential buyers without strong opinions either way.
Negative: On the negative side, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's odometer readings and service history. @Hjabsheh1973 expressed hesitation about the odometer rollback and sought additional clarity, indicating a possible lack of trust. @Hjabsheh1973 further inquired whether any adjustments were made to the engine for California smog testing, suggesting worry about the car's operational integrity. Despite the excitement around the car, these questions leave a lingering concern about transparency and reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @craigfen commented on the car's aesthetic appeal, stating it looks sweet in white, and praised the intact sail panels. @markl350 also noted that this build is well done compared to other expensive builds that use makeshift materials. @MikeDTaz expressed excitement and suggested potential modifications for enhancing the car's performance, showing hope for its future with the right adjustments. Additional comments highlighted the car's clean build and that it requires minimal work to reach its full potential, adding to its desirability.
Neutral: @68HemiSS (The Seller) responded to queries about the car's features, confirming that all outside lights work and provided information about the rear end ratio being a 3.91. The seller also detailed the car's build components, including the RMS301 AlterKation front end and the Edelbrock heads modified by Indy, alongside timestamps for documentation. Various users contributed suggestions and technical observations regarding the car's setup and performance capabilities, discussing its potential as either a track vehicle or street car based on its current configuration.
Negative: There were critiques regarding the car's build and performance expectations, particularly from @Josephaz, who questioned the engine's capability to achieve the low 12-second times claimed by the seller. He highlighted that the car's differences might indicate it is not a true 1968 model, which could mislead potential buyers. @Valiantjim noted that while the car is impressive, clarity about the cylinder heads is necessary, insinuating that the sellers might not be straightforward about the specifications, which could confuse buyers further. Overall, some users felt skeptical about the car’s actual racing potential, while other comments pointed to miscommunications among observers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the excellent condition of the Lincoln Town Car Cartier, with @J.P._Dashpot praising its amazing condition and @drock87 calling it absolutely gorgeous. The car's striking color is noted by @Longmire45, who appreciates how it shines in the sunlight. Additionally, the nostalgia attached to the model is expressed by @TheDoctorr, who shares fond memories linked to earlier versions of the Town Car. @billyblyth reminisces about his own experience with a previous model, emphasizing its reliability and fuel efficiency.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification on the vehicle's specifications and service history. @LW57 inquires about the age of the tires and previous servicing, to which @aSingh39 (The Seller) confirms that the car has seen annual servicing, albeit not all records are available on CARFAX. @F1NYC asks about the functioning of the air conditioning, while @CC3698 checks on the status of the air suspension and other components, ensuring the car is ready for long trips after purchase. @JohnEB's question about the gear display further emphasizes the need for potential buyers to understand specific functionality.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns over the car's condition and history. @LW57 mentions that the Carfax report shows limited servicing since 2011, prompting questions about the car's maintenance and reliability. @CC3698 expresses worry about the integrity of various parts, hinting at possible red flags. Overall, there is a mix of admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and caution regarding its maintenance history, reflecting typical buyer hesitation in auctions.
|
 |
Positive: @Sjalabais commented on the vehicle's appealing '60s vibe, highlighting its nostalgic charm. @70_duster praised the color combination, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Capt_Nemo expressed excitement, mentioning a personal interest in acquiring a '60s collectible vehicle. @jrichard711 simply noted that the cart is cool, while @Sparrownaut hinted that the vehicle might inspire a newfound interest in golf. @Missesfluff complimented the seller on the impressive restoration, acknowledging the cart's exceptional appearance for its age.
Neutral: @JoCoRo raised a question about the vehicle's speed, followed by @tigesavage (The Seller) providing a detailed answer with a link to a video showing the cart in motion and its gentle wobble at higher speeds. @kfoster2 asked for the cart's physical dimensions, prompting @tigesavage (The Seller) to assure that measurements would be shared soon. @abscars shared a local perspective, mentioning the history of the vehicle and the company that built it while also acknowledging the absence of an umbrella top in this model.
Negative: @Capt_Nemo and @Missesfluff's comments suggest some reservations about the vehicle's speed and potential limitations. However, no particularly negative comments were found; concerns seemed more like inquiries for clarification rather than outright criticism. @tigesavage (The Seller) addressed these concerns positively, indicating that he had put a lot of thought and effort into the restoration, dismissing any regrets about the investment made into the cart.
|
2017 Mini Cooper John Cooper Works Hardtop 2-Door 6-Speed
WMWXM9C59HT998137
Lot 237642
Private Party
 |
Positive: The seller, @mjraudi, expresses a straightforward and friendly disposition about selling their JCW, highlighting their experience with the car since purchasing it in September 2024. They mention enjoying their time driving it in Washington, DC, and explain their reason for selling, which is their upcoming move for work. @mjraudi is open to answering questions, providing a level of transparency that potential buyers appreciate, and actively engages with inquiries from interested parties.
Neutral: @mjraudi responds to several questions posed by potential buyers, addressing concerns about minor issues, like a chip in the windshield, and the lack of a CD player. They detail the car's audio features, such as Bluetooth and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto support, which demonstrates that the vehicle is modern and functional. Additionally, the seller discusses regular maintenance, mentioning the brake flush cost and referring to a reputable shop, which adds credibility to their responses.
Negative: Concerns arise among potential buyers, namely @bthurman1092, about a potential recall on the fueling system, which @mjraudi cannot confirm as they haven't encountered it during their ownership. This lack of awareness may concern buyers looking for reassurance about the car's reliability. Moreover, @jak47 queries about the clutch, specifically about the possibility of it popping out of gear, which could suggest underlying issues that might deter some buyers from proceeding with the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Floridajsm (The Seller) describes the Norton Commando as a great bike that requires some polishing and alignment, and highlights that it features a new aftermarket fuel tank, which has been installed due to concerns about the original tank's condition after sitting unused during winters. He chooses to provide potential buyers with more details, noting the presence of a cutoff switch and plans to share a video demonstrating the bike's exhaust sound.
Neutral: @Tenere700 contributes useful historical context regarding the bike's components, identifying the forks as potentially coming from early Kawasaki models. This engagement adds depth to the discussion, and @Floridajsm (The Seller) expresses appreciation for this information while confirming the bike's origins from Alberta, making it a collaborative thread of insights about the vehicle's background.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters such as @RMAG911, who inquires about the original fuel tank and whether the chassis is bent, suggesting uncertainty about the bike's condition despite @Floridajsm's assurances. Additionally, @Dfhodg questions the need for a new fuel tank, which may imply skepticism regarding the motorcycle's maintenance history. Overall, while the seller provides reassurances, some potential buyers remain critical or curious about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @cdrusn described the car as a great vehicle with only minor work required and noted its reasonable price compared to similar models. @Aaron1982 (The Seller) emphasized that the vehicle runs and drives well, mentioning it had very low miles for its year and was well-maintained by the late owner who cared deeply for it. The seller also pointed out the soft top is in immaculate condition, and the engine has been well-cared for, expressing a hopeful attitude about the car's potential with a little TLC.
Neutral: There were several inquiries needing clarification about the car, such as whether it had a hardtop (@bhayes92645, @Rosenberg12) and requests for more photos of the rust areas (@Rosemary). Furthermore, @ebeker asked if the air conditioning worked, to which @Aaron1982 confirmed that it does. It’s clear from these interactions that potential buyers are assessing the vehicle's condition carefully, discussing its merits in terms of reliability and value.
Negative: @19Willys46 expressed skepticism about the vehicle being worth much, suggesting it might only serve as a parts car, and noted that bids so far were insulting. The issues of rust were raised multiple times, with @Aaron1982 acknowledging the need for some work but stating the car still holds significant value. Additionally, @Kynagidas mentioned the possibility of the car being worth more in parts, further echoing concerns about its current value in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: @Bell_Diver describes the vehicle as the epitome of a perfect weekend work truck, highlighting its simple charm and capability for both work and leisure activities. They express appreciation for its old-school appeal, making it enjoyable for casual errands as well as attending car shows. @BR69GMC shares positive feedback on the truck's appearance, specifically mentioning their liking for the dark green color. @jturner finds the truck stylistically appealing, noting its style and functionality for daily work. @funkaholik also appreciates the truck's design, favoring the GMC appearance over Chevrolet's, and finds it overall solid despite some minor concerns.
Neutral: @P51 raises practical questions regarding the vehicle's original engine and transmission, potential oil leaks, and the condition of vital components such as tires and brakes, indicating a desire for more clarity on its operational status. @donora1234 seeks information about what appears to be rear differential fluid splatter visible in certain images, demonstrating a neutral inquiry about the vehicle's condition. @Mb40453 (The Seller) clarifies their uncertainty about the engine and transmission while also sharing information about the truck's performance and the seller's background with the vehicle, reflecting an intent to keep potential buyers informed despite being out of town.
Negative: @jujitsu humorously comments on the frequent occurrences of sellers being out of town when listing vehicles, implying a potential lack of engagement or transparency among sellers in general. They question whether this is a standard practice, suggesting skepticism about the seller's reliability. @jturner points out specific concerns regarding the engine stamp and its origins, subtly hinting at the importance of accurate information in determining the vehicle's authenticity and potential issues. Additionally, @funkaholik notes visible damage in specific photos, indicating a concern over the truck's overall condition despite its perceived strengths.
|
 |
Positive: @Greggybase highlighted the car's low mileage, describing only driving it 200 miles over five years as a crime, underscoring the car's potential for enjoyment. @Raptor2012 (The Seller) expressed deep affection for the car, stating it delivered satisfaction in both fun and comfort since he acquired it. @01996tt praised the aesthetics of the Z car, calling it the best looking in the Z family and appreciating its well-preserved condition, suggesting it would do well in the auction.
Neutral: @CentralOregon made inquiries about the car's original audio system, confirming it contains parts from Bose and is in good shape. He also asked about the A/C functionality and a driving video, indicating interest in specific operational aspects. @a3po commented on a video showing the gauges, questioning a possible tachometer reading discrepancy, but noted the sound dampening might be affecting his perception.
Negative: @Jzack pointed out a common issue with the car, noting a busted passenger side cowl above the battery, which occurs during battery replacements, suggesting a possible concern for future ownership. @eagales asked about the car's history regarding smoking and odors, along with any potential door dings, hinting at worries about past ownership. @Raptor2012 (The Seller) acknowledged the cowl issue, expressing surprise and thanking @Jzack for the informative insight.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments show appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @AliceAustin describes it as 'very nice' and 'well sorted', emphasizing the attractive dual exhaust that enhances its sound. @RBailey57 calls it the 'nicest Frogeye' they have seen, and @GenauAutoWerks compliments it not just for its appearance but also for being sold by a reputable @seller. Others like @DonPanMan and @hardtuned (The Seller) also speak highly of the upgrades, particularly the aluminum radiator and the driving experience, which enhances its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle also address practical aspects such as the reason for sale, with @rjr59AH questioning why the current owner is selling so soon after purchasing it. @hardtuned (The Seller) explained that the owner is downsizing to a location that can only accommodate two cars, indicating a necessary decision rather than an indication of the vehicle's quality. The conversation about specific features, like the push button switch for an air horn mentioned by @Russ, showcases a mix of curiosity and information-sharing that holds relevance for potential buyers.
Negative: While the overall feedback is overwhelmingly positive, concerns arise about the quick sale after purchase, sparking questions about the vehicle's past or any underlying issues. Some skeptics may wonder if there are unmentioned problems motivating the sale despite the owner’s stated reasons. However, these doubts are generally overshadowed by the positive commentary regarding the car's features and enhancements, although the initial question from @rjr59AH lingers as a point of potential concern.
|
 |
Positive: @CZcarsnetLLC showcases the 2019 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE P360 as a beautifully maintained luxury vehicle. The seller emphasizes meticulous upkeep and a fresh cleaning, indicating that the car is in excellent condition and ready for its new owner. The communication encourages potential buyers to reach out with questions, which adds a welcoming touch to the selling process.
Neutral: The auction for the 2019 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE P360 is nearing its end, with only 19 hours remaining. The seller mentions that the vehicle has been serviced, further indicating its readiness for a new caretaker. This detail suggests that the car has been properly looked after and is in good working order, although specific performance details are not mentioned.
Negative: While the description highlights the car's preparation and upkeep, there are no detailed insights into any potential downsides or issues with the vehicle. The description lacks information on mileage, accident history, or features that could be relevant to buyers, which may leave some questions unanswered for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received very positive remarks, with @One80out highlighting its unique features, such as the absence of Daytona seats which can be uncomfortable, and the preference for the cleaner look without Ferrari fender shields. @boaboyoz described it as a 'scintillating specimen' and an overall beauty with a great classy color combination. The seller, @iLussoOC, also noted that the car is in amazing shape, with a clean interior and perfect engine condition, assuring potential buyers of its excellent maintenance history and care.
Neutral: Comments regarding the vehicle's service history expressed curiosity and inquiries about various aspects, including service records and details about the clutch percentage and tires from users such as @clean_machina and @The_Underhill_Account. @iLussoOC confirmed efforts to obtain receipts for maintenance and service records, indicating that the car is well taken care of. @The_Underhill_Account raised points regarding the potential need for a belt service and the age of the tires, showing interest in the vehicle's overall condition without showing strong bias either way.
Negative: Concerns were also voiced about potential issues with the vehicle, including the question of past paint work and the lack of clutch wear readings raised by @clean_machina. @The_Underhill_Account noted that with the mileage and the model year, the car might be more of a driver than an investment piece, implying doubts about its long-term value. Additionally, there were inquiries into the functioning of critical components, such as the vent ring controlling the butterfly valve, pointing towards things that may need attention.
|
 |
Positive: @MGK mentioned how much they loved the vehicle, calling it their favorite car ever. @alshafi expressed appreciation for the rare specifications and color of the car, suggesting that the limited options could be a positive aspect. @jrb007 complemented the vehicle's appearance and performance, stating that it looks great and eagerly reflecting on the impressive capabilities of the E63 wagon. @planesandautomobiles (The Seller) highlighted the car's versatility in suspension settings, noting that it can be comfortable for daily driving or aggressive for performance demands, which adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @MistaB and @nvanmali95, asked about the car's engine mounts, damage report, and service records, indicating a desire for more information. @planesandautomobiles (The Seller) provided thorough explanations regarding the damage caused to the intercooler but did not recall any significant engine mount issues, which seems consistent with maintaining the vehicle's health. The conversation also touched on various aspects of the vehicle's operation, including its drift mode functionality and comfort levels in different settings, demonstrating a range of interests from prospective buyers.
Negative: On the downside, @nvanmali95 raised concerns about the vehicle's damage report and the absence of records concerning brakes, which may cause apprehensions regarding its maintenance. @rbrtcrrr noted that there aren’t many service records for a vehicle that is six years old and has 45,000 miles, suggesting a potential red flag. @8cylindersminimum inquired about the vehicle's ride quality, echoing concerns he had heard that it might be rough, as experienced in similar models, which could deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Oakee expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle, saying "Wow," while @cfiester exclaims "damn" highlighting its impressive appearance. @fabedaniel07 agrees with the sentiment by stating "hell yeah." @BSer is equally impressed, calling it an "unbelievable find" in a "nice spec," referring to it as a "Black beauty." Additionally, @blw0924 reveals their admiration by stating that they are in love with the truck and would want it in their collection due to its condition.
Neutral: Comments reflect curiosity and diagnostic discussions about the vehicle's condition. @JHernandez asks if the truck was regularly started when stored and queries about any fluid leaks after driving. @masonhowell13, the seller, confirms it was not started for over a decade and states that no fluid leaks have been found. @Intimidator04 and @MS3DALE share technical details about the truck, such as the factory flares and modifications like the shocks that were replaced, offering insights into the vehicle's history and specifications.
Negative: Concerns about the truck's prolonged inactivity are raised by @Mercuryman who notes potential issues from sitting too long. @5.0THIS questions whether undercoating was applied by the previous owner, suggesting possible hidden issues, while @davemx5 observes that surface rust may have developed due to the prolonged sitting. @wesson73 doubts the authenticity of the flares, noting they don’t look correct and suggesting they could be aftermarket. Overall, there is a sense of caution amidst the excitement.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the overall presentation and aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. @WAGONBOYTD praised it as a smart-looking classic with potential for a successful auction, while @CKart enthusiastically referred to it as "Wow! what a truck!" @StanleyAF1 commended the superb paint job and expressed satisfaction with its presentation. Additionally, @GBRBiLL noted the stunning color of the vehicle, highlighting its uniqueness compared to more common options, and @oldbrick appreciated the well-maintained undercarriage, which indicated good care and maintenance of the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: There were several technical inquiries regarding some operational aspects of the vehicle, particularly concerning the air conditioning and radio functionality. @kerouact questioned the non-operational AC and radio, and the seller, @perry240, provided an explanation, noting the radio had worked upon purchase but has issues now, while the AC hadn't been inspected. Other commenters, such as @oldbrick, inquired about the tires, front swivel balls, and potential leaks, receiving detailed responses from the seller regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance work undertaken. @KevinK pointed out a minor error in the installation of the rear mudflaps, which @perry240 acknowledged and corrected promptly.
Negative: Some negative feedback revolved around the vehicle's modifications, such as the replacement of chrome bumpers with a different finish, which @Volvodr found necessary to address respectfully. @ibikenow remarked on the challenges and costs associated with re-chroming bumpers, suggesting that painting them is an understandable alternative. Additionally, there were concerns about the catalytic converters being non-compliant with CARB standards, as mentioned by @gelliott32, which could affect the vehicle's appeal in regions with strict emissions regulations. Lastly, @jerimiahjohnson speculated about the rarity of the car's current condition without undercoating, indicating it might not be typical for vehicles of this age.
|
 |
Positive: @fuelieguy expressed admiration for the Corvette, appreciating it as a nice vehicle that would leave someone very happy at the auction's end. @molzent shared that the car can indeed be driven and enjoyed, highlighting its strong performance and appeal. The seller provided insights on the car's history, noting its original parts, recent mechanical improvements, and the overall quality of craftsmanship that has preserved the vehicle since its repaint in the 1980s.
Neutral: @noisyboyz inquired about the engine specifications, showing interest in the performance qualities of the car, while @corvettekent asked about the hardtop, confirming that it comes only with a soft top. @kylejb sought clarification regarding any necessary modifications for adding a hardtop, reflecting interest in the car's features. This car has been a well-loved fixture at car shows, and its history, mentioned by @molzent, adds to its value as a collectible.
Negative: @billyjay criticized the chromed headlight bezels, indicating it detracts from the car's originality, although @molzent countered that it's an easy change. @dasher16 raised questions about the functionality of the wipers and other lights, indicating uncertainty about some operational aspects of the vehicle. Additionally, there were concerns regarding the tachometer's performance, as @dasher16 noted it makes noise and bounces at low RPMs, highlighting potential issues that need addressing.
|
 |
Positive: @Beeshay16 shared their enjoyment of the 2003 456M GT, indicating it is a delightful vehicle for long drives, and plans to showcase it at the Ferrari National meeting which adds a social aspect to ownership. @boaboyoz praised the car's aesthetics, complimenting its exquisite Grigio Titanio color and the standout Bordeaux interior while also recognizing @silverarrowcarsltd as a legendary seller, which adds a level of credibility to the transaction. The car garnered excitement among commenters, with @SCorona and @theforce88 expressing enthusiasm about the auction and the car's beauty respectively, amplifying its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments highlighted the car's features and history, including @Ejaso expressing admiration for the vehicle's design. @MaverickMiami posed important questions regarding the car's maintenance and history, such as the last timing belt service, showing a serious interest in due diligence before a potential purchase. @damonstats inquired about the possibility of inspecting the car in person, while @silverarrowcarsltd responded with offers for further engagement, indicating that the seller is open to communication and transparency.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's condition over time. @ojo3985 pointed out numerous issues documented in the car's service history, including electrical failures, leather problems, and concerns about the car's maintenance, asking if these issues persist today. @killer58's responses highlighted that the age of the vehicle naturally comes with various wear and tear considerations. Commenters like @banduk and @TripleG also sought clarification about interior conditions and past repair concerns, leading to skepticism among potential buyers about long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @gccch praised the vehicle's setup and expressed that it runs well for its mileage, highlighting the potential performance of the truck.
Neutral: @tifjeslil (The Seller) confirmed that they do not have the OEM rear bumper being inquired about by @ckelt88. In response to questions from @robd02809, the seller was asked for a picture of the dash without the cover and to clarify what is under the tape on the tailgate.
Negative: @Nadster criticized the vehicle for having an 'ugly bumper' and inquired about the availability of the stock bumper, questioning whether it would fit properly. @Nadster also raised concerns regarding potential surface rust spots on the vehicle, asking if there had been previous rust issues that were fixed.
|
Duntov Award–Winning 1966 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe L36 427/390 4-Speed
194376S102771
Lot 237742
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenters overwhelmingly express admiration for the 1966 Corvette, highlighting its beauty, restoration quality, and prestigious awards like the Duntov Mark of Excellence. @StingrayJames mentions its impressive restoration by an NCRS Master Judge, and @67Corvetteguy describes it as a stunning example that has consistently amazed onlookers. @TonyinKC emphasizes the rigorous requirements to achieve such awards, confirming the quality and detail evident in the car's restoration process. Other commenters like @Deano and @boaboyoz also rave about its design and exemplary condition, indicating this car is indeed a 'dream' vehicle for many enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments touch on specific features and inquiries without expressing strong positive or negative sentiments. @Raymond0101 requests a video of the exhaust, while @OldVelasco inquires about air conditioning options, which is confirmed as absent by @Shootnride. The seller @Waterwonder engages with these questions, promising to provide videos and explanations that show functionality and aspects of the car. @Sturgis1967 commends the documentation and authenticity but maintains a neutral tone overall. Additionally, a few remarks about the car's specific features, like the N32 Teakwood steering wheel mentioned by @Shootnride, further illustrate aspects of interest.
Negative: There are minimal negative comments, with a few suggestions for improvements or potential issues. @Gloccamora mentions the need for 'bolt-ons and Goodyear Blue Streaks,' implying improvements could be made for performance or aesthetic enhancement. @ddd3agr humorously questions if it would be a crime to simply enjoy driving the car rather than focusing solely on its collectible value, somewhat reflecting a concern about the pressures of maintaining such a high-quality vehicle. No strong criticisms of the car’s quality arose in the comments, indicating overall satisfaction.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning custom build and exceptional craftsmanship. @theweeb expressed admiration for the quality of the work and the appealing paint, noting its suitability for collectors and enthusiasts alike. @EGA envisioned it being a fantastic setup for tail-gate parties and remarked about the significant investment behind the build, indicating it represents a high level of craftsmanship. Additionally, @MontanaBroncos indicated they could have fun with it, showcasing excitement about the vehicle's potential for adventure.
Neutral: The seller, @ExclusiveMotorClub, provided detailed responses to various inquiries, confirming the inclusion of the factory doors and hardtop and noting there were no significant changes made to the original build apart from the custom enhancements. They clarified the weight and specifications of the trailer, stating that it weighs 2400 pounds and does not have axle brakes. Comments from @ValpoMike and @Kindell_Motors discussed previous auction outcomes, indicating a keen historical interest in the vehicle's value.
Negative: Some concerns were raised in the comments regarding the practicality and functionalities of the vehicle. @Dfhodg inquired whether the roof rack needed to be removed to accommodate the hardtop, indicating concerns about usability in urban conditions. @hensleyac also noted that the trailer lacked bilstein suspension and expressed curiosity about any modifications made, suggesting that potential buyers wanted reassurance of the vehicle's condition beyond its aesthetic appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Hubie7 shared a positive reflection as a previous owner, stating that Audi S8s are underrated and represent incredible value given the current market prices. They drove their 2015 S8 for six years, consistently impressed by its performance. @professorkev complimented the car's impressive looks and speed, indicating it is an excellent option for acceleration on the highway. @socaltvdr highlighted the vehicle's fantastic capabilities and comfort compared to most cars, appreciating the overall experience.
Neutral: @aegmotorsports (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car and its features, including the impressive specifications of the 4.0L V8 engine and various premium packages, which enhances the vehicle's appeal. When queried about maintenance, the seller confirmed that the coolant system was thoroughly checked and flushed during recent engine work, indicating good upkeep. Multiple comments reflect a proactive engagement from the seller, who addressed inquiries regarding vehicle condition and specifications throughout the conversation.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding minor damage noted in the car's history, with @ahsmaroon asking for clarification on its provenance. @RichDD questioned why a timing chain replacement was necessary at such low mileage, suggesting potential issues with reliability. Additionally, @socaltvdr raised a concern about coolant leaks, a common issue with this model, prompting the seller to confirm that their checks showed no leaks but indicating there could be lurking issues for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition and aesthetic appeal. @boaboyoz praised the car's eye-catching white color and the appealing gold wheels, stating it's a 'killer build'. @PorterRacing76 mentioned that the car looks mint and provides an exhilarating experience every time, echoing the sentiment that the car is a true race car built for enthusiasts. @805carguy also shared the joy of driving a similar GT model, emphasizing how fun it is to accelerate through the gears.
Neutral: Commenters asked pertinent questions about the car's features and history. @b2finity requested information on maintenance records, while @yiliceo11 inquired about the front lift system and additional images of the control panel. @Nicklaus remarked on the significance of the front lift system, mentioning how it's not commonly used and posed questions about what might be missing for pure enthusiasts. @182T (The Seller) acknowledged these questions, emphasizing that the car is well-maintained, with records and fresh servicing being done.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding the absence of a front axle lift, with @Airbag79 mentioning its lack of functionality and @yiliceo11 emphasizing the need for close-up pictures of the button panel. @Nicklaus expressed skepticism over the front lift's desirability in such vehicles, suggesting that scuffs are typical regardless of this feature. Overall, while the car has received much praise, the lack of a front lift raised questions among potential buyers about its practical use.
|
 |
Positive: @CKart noted that the vehicle is stunning, indicating a strong visual appeal. Additionally, @svtf150r (The Seller) shared detailed information about the car's features, such as the Remote Touch controller, which enhances user interaction with the dashboard screen. The car's luxury package, which includes rear massaging seats, was also positively highlighted in response to inquiries about other functions and features.
Neutral: Comments from @JChrisImpla and @Txtriathlete showed an interest in the vehicle's functionality and options without expressing negativity. @JChrisImpla asked for clarification about a dash trim panel replacement noted in Carfax, while @Txtriathlete inquired about adaptive cruise control and front seat massage features. @svtf150r (The Seller) provided comprehensive responses, indicating a level of transparency regarding the vehicle's condition and specifications.
Negative: @Jessannjoh questioned the reason behind the seller's quick ownership turnaround, suggesting potential concerns about the vehicle's reliability or desirability. While @svtf150r (The Seller) answered that they were simply moving on, this could indicate a lack of complete satisfaction with the purchase. Additionally, the initial inquiry by @Calbr about minor damage may imply apprehension regarding the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @damonkr expressed admiration for the matte black wrap on the vehicle, showing a strong appreciation for the Lamborghini Urus overall. Another user, @CoastCorvette (The Seller), provided details about the vehicle's engine replacement, highlighting that a new engine was installed 16 months ago and has performed well since. They also noted the wrap's quality, explaining it covers the door jambs and is not cheap to do, further supporting the vehicle's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: @Tnbusiness71 and @Jahmakn raised inquiries regarding the vehicle's history, including requests for photos of the damage before the wrap and documentation regarding the engine replacement. @Oscar512 asked about warranty details for the new engine, and @VirginiaC questioned whether the wrap could be removed and its impact on the original finish. @CoastCorvette responded thoughtfully to these questions, indicating the engine now has approximately 35,000 miles and offering to provide additional pictures upon request.
Negative: Concerns were articulated primarily regarding the vehicle's history and repairs. @Carmelcruiser alluded to the possibility of prior damage being concealed under the wrap, suggesting it could lead to complications when the wrap is removed. Additionally, there were questions about the quality of repairs and the implications of the engine overheating, particularly since the replacement was made outside of the factory warranty and not by an authorized dealer. The lack of pre-repair documentation raised skepticism about the overall integrity of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's uniqueness and history. @Nur31 reminisced about their own blue version of the car, noting it as a fun seasonal ride. @corkscrewlife provided insights about its rarity, sharing a personal connection through their grandfather's vehicle, and labeled it a gorgeous third-gen Formula 305. @Espo70 fondly remembered his past experiences with similar cars and highlighted the vehicle's attractive yellow color and equipment, while @johnjm noted the Formula's performance and value compared to the Trans Am during its time, praising its restrained aesthetic.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the specifics of the vehicle's configuration and maintenance. @2002regalgs, the seller, clarified details regarding the car's mileage from a past sale and its current condition, addressing questions about its undercoating and mileage discrepancies. @drshawnphd inquired about the original wheels, to which the seller responded that although they preferred a different style, the original wheels are available. @MSP_MC mentioned the rarity of the specific yellow color and shared a personal story about his father's ownership of a similar model, establishing a broader context for the car's significance.
Negative: Critiques included concerns about the vehicle's underbody and suggested potential areas for improvement. @BizJetTech noted that while the car has low mileage, the treatment of the underside raised questions about its authenticity. @MSP_MC and @TurboBrad discussed painting and maintenance details, with some skepticism about the spray paint items listed in the service invoice, prompting inquiries from others regarding specific touch-ups made on the vehicle. Additionally, there was a mention of the absence of the original wheels in the sale, which caused disappointment among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments regarding the 2007 Ferrari F430 Spider reflect a strong positive sentiment, showcasing admiration for its overall condition and specifications. @Quikvet praises the car's color combination and extras, while @cardude76 expresses pride in ownership of such a lovely vehicle. The seller, @Shopexoticars, highlights the car's meticulous maintenance, impressive features, and recent services, including a well-preserved interior and exterior that surprises many observers. Additionally, commenters note the car's enjoyable driving experience, which is backed by various upgrades like aftermarket headers, indicating a well-cared-for automobile that can still provide delight on the road.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification on specific aspects of the vehicle, indicating a neutral position but still engaged interest. @cubfan questioned whether the posted videos were current, to which @Shopexoticars confirmed they were recent. Others, like @mig1980 and @johnnyb11, asked for additional details about the Scuderia audio sound system upgrade and the removal of the hi-fi bass module respectively, showing curiosity about the car's configurations but without showing strong opinions on its desirability. This back-and-forth indicates that potential buyers are exploring facets of the car to make informed decisions.
Negative: Despite the overall favorable views, there were a few negative undertones. @AD15 pointed out the absence of clear pictures of the aftermarket headers, reflecting a concern over the completeness of the listing. @cardude76 also noted that some commenters seemed confident in the market value without backing their claims with bids, suggesting skepticism about certain assertions within the discussion. Furthermore, another user, @clean_machina, remarked on how mileage significantly affects the value of Ferrari models, implying caution regarding the perceived worth of this specific example compared to others in the market.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyvett praises the car as a nice 70, indicating a strong interest. @Moepoe describes the Corvette as beautiful and highlights its high-quality restoration while noting a small surprise regarding the battery, which does not diminish the car's overall appeal. @dan1495 shares enthusiasm for the L46 convertible, complimenting its good documentation and expressing confidence in the seller's success in selling the car, given its high standards and quality.
Neutral: @Curvette1 inquires about the status of the engine and parts, specifically asking if they have been rebuilt to stock specifications and if the original fiberglass is intact. @mayoungblut raises a question about whether the wiper door functions properly. @StingrayHawaii appreciates the car's beauty and combination for cruising but mentions that they have similar vehicles, indicating interest but a lack of intent to bid.
Negative: @mayoungblut expresses concern over the chrome edging on the fender potentially being painted over, questioning the car's condition and NCRS ratings. @1974pantera suggests replacing the fuel pump before sale, implying a concern about the car's readiness for long-distance driving. Additionally, @sword24 asks about the availability of smog parts, revealing potential worries about compliance with regulations.
|
 |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy praised the vehicle as the best overall S class since the W126, highlighting its exceptional quality and reputation. This indicates a positive perception of the car's design and performance, showing enthusiasm for its attributes.
Neutral: @PrivateCollectionMotors (The Seller) expressed excitement about bringing the vehicle to auction and encouraged potential buyers to ask questions. They also noted the importance of inspections being completed before the auction ends and indicated their willingness to assist with shipping arrangements for out-of-state buyers. They provided updates on the car's condition, stating they replaced the tires in February and which functions should be checked.
Negative: @pstevereynolds raised a concern regarding the air suspension, specifically mentioning that the front passenger side appears low. @PrivateCollectionMotors (The Seller) admitted they were unsure of the last time the suspension was serviced, limiting information on vehicle maintenance history. Additionally, @Petegrv79 inquired about the absence of any codes related to various seat functions, indicating a desire for more detailed reassurance about the vehicle's mechanical state.
|
 |
Positive: @vfnrcc (The Seller) emphasizes the quality and authenticity of their vehicles, having curated them with care for the Bring a Trailer community. They highlight their extensive experience in the car industry and commitment to transparent communication. Furthermore, they assure potential buyers that each car undergoes thorough testing to guarantee its excellent condition, alongside offering a no-reserve price that reflects their confidence in the vehicle’s reliability.
Neutral: Comments from users like @dino140 appreciate the Subaru's sporty yet utilitarian nature, with some mentioning their personal experiences with similar models. @Rick04005 raises some valid concerns regarding the vehicle's battery life, suggesting it has consumed several batteries and alternators, but also expresses understanding of the factors influencing battery longevity. Observations about the vehicle's condition, such as its tire wear and mechanical checks, aim to spark further discussion and inquiry.
Negative: However, situations such as the concerns raised by @Icenoggle about the service history and @zmhdes questioning the potential for head gasket issues cast some doubt on the vehicle's overall reliability. Additional inquiries from users like @bogtrotter about subframe durability and maintenance history reflect a broader concern for common Subaru problems. Many comments express a mix of confidence and skepticism, as some users share their challenging experiences with past vehicles, touching on the balance between enthusiasm and caution.
|
 |
Positive: The overall sentiment towards the 2003 Jeep Wrangler TJ is positive, with many commenters appreciating its cleanliness and condition. @Henhen11, who is the seller, provides information about the vehicle's good running condition, garage-kept history, and its highly sought-after Stone White color. Commenters like @mspaulding88 and @tawson highlight the vehicle's clean undercarriage and smooth clutch engagement, respectively, indicating that it is in great shape. @Henhen11 also offers assurances of the Jeep's maintenance, including confirmed functionality of the HVAC and cruise control systems, which adds to the confidence of potential buyers.
Neutral: Some commenters have posed questions to the seller regarding specific features of the Jeep, showing an interest in its performance without expressing strong opinions. For instance, @tawson inquires about the clutch's feel and noise levels when driving on the highway with a soft top, indicating curiosity about the driving experience. @militarydave35 requests a shipping quote, and @Richf523 asks about the functionality of controls and any signs of leaks. These questions reflect a desire for detailed information that may not yet be fully addressed in the comments.
Negative: While the comments are predominantly positive, there are unaddressed concerns that could be construed as negative. @Mook1972 expresses a desire for a visual inspection, which hints at potential hesitation about purchasing without seeing the vehicle first. This suggests that some prospective buyers may remain cautious about the online auction process. Also, the request for the original wheels from @BirdIsDaWord implies a concern about aftermarket modifications or missing components that could impact the vehicle's original value.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the 1938 BMW 320, highlighting its rarity and historical significance. @JGraham notes the beautiful patina of the leather seats, suggesting they should not be recovered as they represent the car's history. @57charlie emphasizes the car's rarity, not just in casual terms but as a significant piece of automotive archaeology, as such sedans were often scrapped. @Ranchero65 and @gregorylv mention the car's historical background and how it escaped WWII, adding depth to its story as a collectible piece.
Neutral: There are various inquiries about the car's functionality and characteristics. @182T asks about a comfortable cruising speed, while @Jive raises questions about the accuracy of the details shared by the seller regarding usage and maintenance. This suggests a curiosity about the car's current state and reliability, indicating that some prospective buyers are assessing its practicality beyond its aesthetic appeal. @TampaGarage (The Seller) provides some insights into the car's performance, mentioning that it handles well at around 30-35 mph.
Negative: Some comments question the car's condition and the seller's transparency. @Jive points out a possible discrepancy regarding the car's mileage and the amount driven by the seller, hinting at potential misrepresentation. Additionally, @Just_me expresses doubts about their ability to adequately care for such a classic vehicle, reflecting concerns about the car's stewardship and its future. @gasclass9 also inquires about the car's design features, bringing attention to what they perceive as shortcomings, such as the protruding pipes on the firewall.
|
 |
Positive: @NaplesLuxuryCars (The Seller) describes this Porsche 944S2 as one of, if not the nicest in the country, highlighting its exceptional condition and well-preserved status, having been stored in a climate-controlled environment. Other commenters, such as @Spokayman and @DHD997, echo this sentiment, noting the car's impressive upkeep and the quality of its cleaning and maintenance. Many express their excitement about the vehicle's impressive features, such as the power top, Bluetooth radio, and overall aesthetics, particularly the stunning paint job and excellent interior condition.
Neutral: Several commenters raise practical questions about the vehicle’s history, specifically about the Carfax report and previous ownership, including @kvncrll1's inquiries regarding the number of owners and a past accident report. Additionally, @leftlane11 and @Pilot425 request to see documented maintenance records to ensure the vehicle has been properly cared for, contributing to their decision-making about the bid. The dialogue reflects a community of potential buyers who are interested in verifying the seller's claims about the car's service and overall value before proceeding.
Negative: Some concerns surface about maintenance, particularly regarding the timing belt, which several users, including @JT70 and @Markro, suggest should be replaced due to its age, as it's crucial for preventing engine failure. @leftlane11 estimates additional costs for service and repairs that could amount to $5,000, including tire replacements and necessary maintenance, which raises doubts about the overall investment required for the vehicle. Other commenters express skepticism about the market price and the additional costs necessary for bringing the car up to date, leading to hesitation about bidding on the auction.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal an overall enthusiasm for the aesthetic appeal and historical significance of the 1940 Ariel Square Four, with users like @pacers35 expressing interest in the bike despite their preference for different models. @LukAutoGroup highlights the auction's remaining time and encourages participation, fostering excitement in the community. Additionally, @jbruns64 praises the electronic ignition system for its practicality, noting that it simplifies starting, which is seen as a positive feature for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about the bike's mechanical state and history, reflecting a practical approach to the auction. @DaveD raises valid questions about service records, oil pressure readings, and the absence of maintenance documentation, while @masterofnon discusses the bike's components, noting differences from original pre-war models. These discussions indicate a level of technical curiosity and a desire for more information before bidding, showing engagement with the auction process.
Negative: Concerns are evident regarding the authenticity and historical accuracy of certain features on the Ariel Square Four. @DaveD emphasizes skepticism about the bike's condition despite hearing it run, indicating that the lack of service records is detrimental. Similarly, @masterofnon critiques aspects of the bike that seem inconsistently modified, suggesting that some elements may not align with the original specifications, which could mislead potential bidders looking for originality.
|
 |
Positive: @double_dee expresses a strong affection for the vehicle, noting it is a joy to drive and expresses temptation to own one. @Dtg3861 (The Seller) echoes this sentiment, describing the car as fast, easy to drive and handle, and a sexy car, reinforcing its enjoyment factor.
Neutral: @racinpastor inquires about the vehicle having both keys and suggests that more recent photos would be beneficial, particularly of the underside, under the hood, and during a cold start. @pewsung also asks for specific details regarding the tires, including date codes, and requests a video of the cold start along with inquiry about any maintenance performed by the current owner since the purchase.
Negative: No negative comments were found in the provided feedback.
|
 |
Positive: @BBK appreciates the Jaguar V12 retrofit, praising the fact that the car retains its Jaguar authenticity rather than being subjected to a different engine transplant. @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as absolutely beautiful, while @castironlimey1 considers it the ideal Jaguar engine swap. @Sparrownaut expresses excitement for the vehicle, stating that more cylinders trump fewer, especially in the context of Jaguar vehicles. @roydestroy shares a nostalgic recollection of driving the car, indicating it is well sorted and a joy to drive, especially on highways.
Neutral: @Leodanc (The Seller) engages with commenters, expressing gratitude for their comments and showing readiness to answer questions, including @Gregpryckman’s inquiry about the engine's mileage. He mentions reaching out to the California BAR to obtain information on the donor engine's mileage from 2010. Additionally, he acknowledges @cornponious's comment about the car's color combination, agreeing that the warm gray looks great against the black leather interior.
Negative: @BaboTN expresses hesitation about the vehicle, indicating that they would only be interested if it were a real XJ12 from a specific year range. There is a slight implicit criticism in their preference for a '92 XJ12 over the current offering. Although the overall sentiment is largely positive, highlighting the vehicle's strengths, @BaboTN's comment reflects a sense of skepticism about the authenticity of the vehicle in question.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle, a 1985 Carrera 3.2, has garnered positive comments highlighting its attractive features and driving experience. Commentor @eelwood praised the car's appearance, describing it as looking great and expressing admiration for the color combination. @Frida echoed this sentiment, calling the color stunning and lauding the 915 gearbox as engaging and fun to drive, positioning the Carrera 3.2 as one of the best models Porsche has built. Commentor @LoneStar001 shared a personal story, recounting an enjoyable cross-country trip in a similar Iris Blue vehicle, demonstrating confidence in the car's reliability.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries about the vehicle's details and service history. @JWU321, the seller, responded to various questions, affirming that the car's paint is believed to be original and sharing that there have been significant maintenance records, including a recent transmission rebuild. Commentor @sloturbo requested further details regarding service labor costs mentioned in the records, while @jose_in_az asked about the possibility of obtaining leak-down numbers before the auction ends, showing a keen interest in the vehicle's mechanical condition.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about missing features or lack of detailed information. @LABLUE pointed out the absence of rear windshield wipers, which was confirmed by @JWU321 as being removed by a previous owner. Additionally, there were inquiries regarding the paint condition and service metrics, with @vonmec asking about paint meter readings and others expressing uncertainty about certain aspects of the car. Commentor @wintershade noted a discrepancy in color perception compared to the Iris Blue label, suggesting it looked closer to Minerva Blue in photos, pointing to a potential issue with the car's visual representation.
|
5.7L LT1-Powered 1958 Chevrolet Apache 3100 Big Window Stepside Pickup
3A58L106293
Lot 237633
Private Party
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received enthusiastic praise from several commenters regarding its aesthetic appeal and build quality. @boaboyoz describes it as a 'beautiful blue Task Force pickup' while @ButWhatDoIKnow appreciates the timeless design of 50's Apaches, calling it a 'nice resto-mod'. @Talon7 also admires the truck, highlighting the effort put in by the seller and their family in restoring it.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's features and history have provided additional insights. The seller, @cambry_pardee, offered details about the restoration process initiated by their father, explaining the extensive work done on the chassis, body, and drivetrain. The truck includes modernized elements, such as a rebuilt LT1 engine and 700R transmission, which aligns with @Nodakn's inquiry about the drivetrain's history. The seller has also shared additional photos documenting the restoration journey, showcasing the transformation of the truck over time.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there are concerns about the truck's paint condition. @tadpole58 noted visible scratches and dings in the paint, which @cambry_pardee acknowledged, indicating that these are mainly where bed chains connect to the tailgate. Additionally, @KevinWenger raised a question about potential rust on the windshield rubber, which the seller could not definitively explain. These issues suggest that while the vehicle is visually appealing, it may have some superficial imperfections that potential buyers should consider.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting the attractive and rare French Blue color. @Snaveck noted the aesthetic appeal of the car without bumper guards, indicating that it looks much better without them. @stugottz complimented the completed work on the car and praised the upgraded sound system and the beautiful redline tires. Furthermore, @Trafficator celebrated the TR6's unique character and mentions how it represents the last year of production, invoking a sense of nostalgia and appreciation for its distinctiveness.
Neutral: Some comments focused on inquiries about the vehicle's features and history. @Zakery questioned the availability of factory rubber bumper guards, and @CarletonScott sought clarification on the original color, which was confirmed by @DaveTal as being the original French Blue. Additionally, @khb647 inquired about the availability of touch-up paint, indicating an interest in keeping the vehicle in great condition. There were also requests for videos, both for cold starts and driving, showing a desire for more information about its performance.
Negative: On the flip side, there were some critical observations regarding the car's condition. @Opie1 pointed out grime under the hood, questioning the thoroughness of the paint job. @Bubbo expressed a strong attachment to the bumper overriders, suggesting the TR6 without them doesn’t feel complete. There were also concerns from @khb647 about the luggage rack and its integration with the car's overall aesthetic. Overall, though the vehicle has many fans, there are a few who hold specific preferences that they feel should be addressed.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the 992 GT3 RS as a "sexy beast" and comments on its appealing build. @EAF agrees, asserting that the car's unique wrap means it will sell for over $400K due to its excellent specifications. Additional positive remarks include @bowiebiewer praising the wrap quality, while @M-Couper acknowledges the vehicle's overall awesomeness despite joking about the wrap. The consensus from several commenters indicates that this car is a standout with desirable features like low mileage and a factory wrap, making it an exceptional choice for potential buyers.
Neutral: Some commenters are focused on specific details about the vehicle, such as @Bruce48127 discussing the price of PTS (Paint to Sample) builds, and @WearingBearings inquiring about the choice of fuel tank size. @Joshy78 acknowledges the car's appeal while speculating on its potential auction outcome, emphasizing that the final bid will determine its worth. The conversation touches upon technical aspects of the vehicle and pricing trends in the auction market, illustrating the varied interests of potential buyers.
Negative: However, there are criticisms as well. @SjgPjg questions the $19,000 cost for the wrap, suggesting that some buyers should shop around. @viprklr expresses frustration about the incomplete window sticker being posted, implying it detracts from the listing's professionalism. @Joshy78 also challenges @EAF for trying to influence bids by pointing out the varying opinions on the car's potential value. These negative comments reflect concerns about price transparency and the presentation of the vehicle in the auction environment.
|
 |
Positive: @johnnyswell commends the vehicle, expressing admiration and indicating a strong interest if it had a manual transmission since he works nearby. @mgbdriver shares his positive experience with a similar model, highlighting its stylish appeal and fun driving experience despite being an automatic. @Oldhockyplayr also reflects positively on his past ownership of a similar model, appreciating its looks and sound while remarking on its ease of maintenance. @agreenstine (The Seller) adds to the positive momentum by detailing the vehicle's appealing features such as the red leather interior and special brakes, and describes the fun elements of driving this car.
Neutral: Several commenters have requested further details about the vehicle. @1974pantera asks for detailed pictures of the undercarriage with the car lifted, while @Huynguyen14 inquires about the remaining life on the brakes. @Pace_Adorno suggests a correction that the listing should clarify that 'IPL' stands for 'Infiniti Performance Line', which @bringatrailer acknowledges and confirms has been updated. @agreenstine (The Seller) keeps prospective buyers engaged by updating images of the undercarriage and encouraging them to check out a video showcasing the car's features.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @Vettefool questions the presence of rust and suggests it might have been driven in snow, while @DiegosBuyingCars humorously mentions modifications awaited by someone named Edgar. @agreenstine (The Seller) reassures potential buyers by clarifying that there is no body rust due to regular maintenance and careful driving, including the use of snow tires when necessary. Despite the reassurances, the initial questions indicate a level of skepticism among some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: @RWB_AZ praised the vehicle as a good looking truck, expressing enthusiasm with 'GLWTA!' @BeastRig referred to it as a beast of a rig, while @Laverdude added a playful 'Hubba Hubba!' showing admiration for its aesthetics.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific details about the vehicle. @Sidhu666 inquired about a missing lug nut and appeared to seek assurance about its condition, while also requesting a driving video. @Weikko asked for more detailed interior photos and raised questions about various aspects of the vehicle's condition, showing an interest in thorough evaluation.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @Trailboss highlighted an issue with the 'O' in the Ford emblem being loose, prompting @americanprideclassics (The Seller) to clarify that it was just a loose bolt that has been fixed. @Outacash suggested that the seller should consider replacing the entire set of lug nuts due to the vehicle's selling price, indicating skepticism about the vehicle's preparedness for sale.
|
 |
Positive: @Kevinlarry1978 expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a "beauty" and inquiring about the factory exhaust, which @landvermark (The Seller) confirmed is included in the sale alongside the Fi exhaust system. @Coolguys chimed in positively, appreciating the sound of the car while wishing for the upgraded Burmester audio system. @Calli74 also praised the car's sound and color, highlighting its appealing aesthetics and performance enhancements.
Neutral: Following @ainsworth88's question about smog testing, @landvermark (The Seller) reassured that the car had passed smog testing as of December 2025, clarifying that the exhaust system is a cat back and the factory switch controls the sound. @P0802253 asked for further details on the exhaust system types and the lien status mentioned in the Carfax report, reflecting the interest from potential buyers regarding the vehicle's legal standing. @Illasram50 also sought clarification on the lien and requested a driving video to better understand the car's performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding a lien on the vehicle, as indicated by the Carfax report. @P0802253 and @Illasram50 both requested details about this issue, which @landvermark (The Seller) addressed by stating that the lien stems from a credit union but assured that the car would be sold free of any liens. This uncertainty may leave some potential buyers apprehensive about the vehicle's financial history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally express enthusiasm about the vehicle's condition and history. @Warwick67 (The Seller) remarks that the car was well taken care of, stored in a clean garage, and free from mice or mold. The original paint is noted for its depth and quality, especially considering it is an unrestored survivor. @Billwi appreciates the condition of the car, and @NCRSmaniac mentions that it offers a lot of visual appeal for the price.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific features related to the vehicle's authenticity and details pertinent to potential collectors. @Mdchap asks if the car has the original Pace Car decals and accessories necessary for NCRS judging. @8tony points out that the undercarriage of the car may need attention to meet the specifications for judging. Additionally, @wannabid55 highlights a common issue with generic descriptions in listings regarding the presence of an 'oil temperature gauge' which is incorrect for this model year.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the vehicle's authenticity and performance specifications. @F16Jock notes that while the car is aesthetically pleasing, it lacks the muscle car performance of earlier models, expressing disappointment that it doesn't come with the more powerful L-82 engine. @RichardPetty humorously questions the state of the vehicle, implying that it may not be as pristine as suggested with comments like 'it has a mouse motor.' This mix of detailed critiques and lighthearted skepticism reflects a cautious approach among some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the 1981 Volkswagen Scirocco, emphasizing its nostalgic value and unique styling. @NovaBorn called it "gorgeous," while @TonsOfGasAutoCollection noted that the car is well cared for with extensive documentation. @Jboswelben and @ralleyquattro reflected on their fond memories of owning Sciroccos, showcasing the car's legacy as a beloved model among enthusiasts. @RumbleAuto appreciated the distinctiveness of the Scirocco compared to the more common Golf/GTI, highlighting its unique character. Overall, previous owners and fans celebrated the vehicle's design and driving experience, making it a favorite among Volkswagen enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments also included inquiries about the car's history and mechanical details. @gint asked for more information regarding its time spent in various states, while other users discussed specific features, such as the faux-wood dash trim mentioned by @Super7Driver. The sentiments highlighted a blend of nostalgia and curiosity as users reminisced about their experiences with similar cars and how they compare to newer models, suggesting a continuing interest in the Scirocco's legacy. Additionally, @misterdangerpants acknowledged the rarity and value of clean, low-mileage models, hinting at a collectible nature in the current market.
Negative: On the flip side, not all comments were entirely positive. @arjayp shared a story about their own Scirocco that suffered from multiple issues during ownership, hinting at the potential downsides of the model, especially those affected by harsh weather conditions. @CharlieB-555 recounted a frustrating experience of having their Scirocco damaged in an accident, leading to a bittersweet nostalgia. Furthermore, @200mph noted that many Scirocco models have succumbed to rust in regions like New England, suggesting that finding well-preserved examples is quite rare. These reflections serve as reminders of some challenges faced by past owners, contrasting the overwhelmingly positive memories shared by many others.
|
 |
Positive: @Spahr_ohio mentioned that the seller is a great guy and honest, indicating trustworthiness. @jonave20 praised the car's appearance, calling it gorgeous and admiring the color combination. @KwisatzH (The Seller) responded positively to compliments about the car's color, noting that the car elicits smiles and waves when driven.
Neutral: @KwisatzH (The Seller) provided clear information in response to inquiries about the vehicle's condition. This included details about the tire size and clearance, confirming that the tires do not rub, and explaining the mileage since the rebuild of the engine and transmission. The seller also shared insights about electronic functions, ensuring all systems operate well and detailing some minor issues with the paint and interior that could be addressed.
Negative: @dbroderick55 raised concerns about the paint, asking about any issues it may have. The seller acknowledged there are chipping problems in certain areas and mentioned the previous paint job from the original color to Guards Red, including details on where the paint is flaking. Additionally, @OldeGreg asked about cold gearbox function and potential changes the seller would make if keeping the car, highlighting possible concerns with the performance.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express nostalgia and appreciation for the simplicity and classic design of the truck, likening it favorably to vehicles from earlier decades. @2002WS6 reflects on how modern trucks have become overly complicated, indicating a preference for the straightforwardness of this model. Others, like @Acorn19, share personal connections to similar vehicles, highlighting the truck's aesthetic appeal and unique qualities that make it stand out in a modern context. @cturby (The Seller) also mentions that the truck has been well-maintained, being garage-kept and having minimal rust repairs, further enhancing its positive reception.
Neutral: Several comments address specifics about the truck, particularly the maintenance history and repairs. @JohnF1966 inquires about the rust repair around the rear windows, showing interest in the vehicle's condition. @cturby (The Seller) responds by clarifying the extent and location of the repairs, noting that the rust was minimal and did not necessitate window removal. There is also a discussion about the truck's listing issues, with @GSD_Guy questioning its classification in auctions, indicating a need for clarification from the seller.
Negative: While there are mostly positive and neutral remarks, there are hints of skepticism regarding reliability from commenters like @L-O123, who expresses concern about finding a dependable vehicle. However, @cturby (The Seller) reassures potential buyers about the overall quality and care that this truck has received. There is no strong negative feedback about the vehicle itself, but the questions raised about its ownership and auction categorization reflect some level of uncertainty among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @kelse92 appreciates the unique color combination and premium package of the Porsche Cayenne Diesel, suggesting that it should be fun to see how it performs in the market. @VytalAuto, the seller, emphasizes the vehicle's overall great condition, well-equipped features, and smooth driving experience. They highlight transparency in the vehicle's condition by noting minor cosmetic imperfections and offering detailed photos and videos to showcase the Cayenne's features and performance.
Neutral: @VytalAuto acknowledges the presence of a coolant leak identified during a 125-point inspection, which has since been professionally repaired. The seller provides reassurance by outlining the maintenance work done, including a synthetic oil change, but also notes that there is no prior maintenance documentation available. @Kiwiguy raises a question about an open recall for the vehicle, prompting @VytalAuto to clarify that there are none, while also referencing the vehicle's records on Carfax and urging for transparency on recalls.
Negative: @Kiwiguy expresses concern regarding a recall from 2022 noted on the Carfax, specifically about headlight seals, indicating a potential issue. @campodf defends the reliability of Porsche's official recall check over the Carfax report, suggesting that the recall might be minor and easily resolved. However, this back-and-forth creates a sense of uncertainty around the vehicle's history, raising questions among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters such as @70_duster and @emjohn43 expressed their admiration for the vehicle's striking red color, highlighting its appeal. @RamblinGarage conveyed enthusiasm, stating a strong commitment to the auction. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, noted the vehicle's exceptional condition, with new oil and filters along with recently installed tires, and expressed their love for this 'sweetheart beast.'
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification on technical aspects, such as @redtanrt10's inquiry about the Koni suspension and whether it was retrofitted. @sserafini provided insight by confirming the presence of Dynamic shocks based on visual evidence. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, engaged with inquiries regarding the frame's metallic wrapping while explaining that it is merely a plastic film that does not affect the vehicle. Their interaction indicates an openness to questions and a desire to educate potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments also indicate skepticism, particularly @RamblinGarage's remark about the vehicle's previous sale being short-lived. @lincmarkv faced feedback for a comment that was flagged as non-constructive, illustrating that not all interactions were supportive. Additionally, @Highrider's question about factory tools hinted at potential buyers' concerns regarding the completeness of the vehicle's package. The seller's responses about lacking specific tools showed a degree of uncertainty that may detract from buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @DaysofThundr46 is intrigued by the vehicle, noting that it’s a 4Runner that hasn't reached $5,000 within the first 24 hours of listing, suggesting increasing interest. @justinsea appreciates the truck and acknowledges its merits despite a missed opportunity for a dash fix during a recall. @amotorsports (The Seller) claims the 4Runner is clean and well-maintained, highlighting the great condition of the frame and its performance, and expresses eagerness to assist potential bidders with any questions.
Neutral: @kars10sadawg expresses a balanced view, recognizing the overall solidity of the vehicle but raising questions about the previous front CV axle replacement, seeking clarification on the reasons behind it and whether other related issues were addressed. @GP65 requests assistance in interpreting the DOT code on the tires, indicating a need for more information about their condition without expressing either strong approval or disapproval. @ActionJackson007 asks about the difficulty of dash replacement, demonstrating curiosity about repair processes.
Negative: Concerns are present regarding the front CV axle replacement raised by @kars10sadawg, who is cautious about potential underlying issues that might have led to the repair. This reflects a general skepticism toward the vehicle's history, stressing the need for transparency from the seller. Additionally, @GP65’s inquiry about the outdated tires implies a potential worry about their safety and suitability for the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praised the bike's overall condition, with @Precisionbob noting its nice appearance and expressing interest in its history. @911tt_7 mentioned their own long history with a similar model, appreciating the bike's electronic ignition upgrade. @Dave310 even went so far as to say the bike was a nice Bonneville after personally viewing it, describing it as having undergone a complete rebuild and restoration, and that it started right up and sounded great. The seller, @swimiller, communicated a sense of care for the bike, remarking on its long history with him and that it has been a trustworthy companion.
Neutral: Several users sought more information about the bike's specifications, such as @BaboTN asking about the original pipes and @Precisionbob inquiring about an invoice for work done on the bike. Questions about past mileage, paint authenticity, and whether videos of the bike's operation would be provided were also raised. Overall, there was a polite exchange of curiosity regarding the bike's details, with many potential buyers expressing their desire for clarification.
Negative: Some comments expressed frustration with the seller's lack of communication. @Precisionbob felt that the seller was not engaging adequately with inquiries, leading to thoughts of un-watching the auction. @mach1970 echoed this concern, suggesting that the selling process would be hindered by unanswered questions. @MaBell41 questioned the seller's commitment to selling, noting that with a reserve, potential buyers would expect prompt responses. @exbikeracer, who showed interest in viewing the bike, felt ignored on their questions about availability.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning build and beautiful design. @Quadrifoglio described it as stunning, while @JCWilkie and @gordon both commented on its beauty, with @gordon specifically noting the quality of the build. The integration of high-performance components was also commended, with @AQHA appreciating the fine parts and smooth firewall. @NRFDDANL highlighted the impressive horsepower of the car, noting the appealing sound and performance capabilities, to which @Texas00X (The Seller) responded positively, adding further details about the vehicle's specifications. Overall, the car has received enthusiastic feedback, with many expressing admiration for its aesthetics and engineering.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the car's specifications and performance features without strong opinions either way. @Deano inquired about the paint code, reflecting an interest in the vehicle's details rather than expressing a judgment. @LVTCLSCS26 posed multiple technical questions regarding the car's boost, bottom end, and other components, seeking more clarity on its performance capabilities. @Texas00X (The Seller) addressed these inquiries, providing detailed responses without indicating any particular issues or enhancements needed. This indicates that while the commenters are engaged, they are mainly focused on exploring the car's potential rather than making conclusive statements about its quality.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters regarding the car's performance and build quality. @CoastMotorGroup questioned the presence of oil leaks, which @Texas00X (The Seller) promptly addressed by confirming that there were none. Additionally, @Desmo_dave issued a caution about handling the powerful build of the car, advising future drivers to be careful and to use the car primarily on a track. @AQHA noted that while the car had high-end parts, there were areas in the engine bay that could have been better managed for aesthetics. Lastly, @JCWilkie pointed out possible blemishes in the paint, prompting a response from @Texas00X (The Seller) acknowledging some imperfections but overall rating the paint job as decent. These comments show that while the vehicle is well-received, there are uncertainties and concerns about aspects of its performance and appearance.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors like @Dyna and @meatballsamsam praised the vehicle's aesthetic, noting that it looks fantastic and the wheels are particularly beautiful. @Rhinosb described the rims as 'gangster' and 'dope', indicating a strong appeal to the vehicle's design. Additionally, @01996tt expressed overall satisfaction with everything about the G wagon, reinforcing positive sentiments about its appearance.
Neutral: @Paladaur (The Seller) provided clarifications about various aspects of the vehicle, addressing questions from potential buyers regarding its past and modifications. He confirmed that the car was never stolen and detailed the repairs made to address cosmetic issues, which were carried out professionally. He mentioned that the aftermarket wiring pertaining to a radar detector was removed and confirmed that there are no leaks or battery draining issues, alongside providing evidence of routine maintenance performed by Mercedes-Benz.
Negative: Concerns were raised by various commentors, including @thomaskwelker and @diskis190, about the vehicle's reported past damage, with requests for more details on the nature of the repairs after incidents in July and October 2022. Commentors such as @Miner64 pointed out potential issues from the inspection report, raising questions about leaks and battery drainage, which @Paladaur addressed but still left some uncertainty regarding the full history of the vehicle. There was also skepticism about the classification of the wheels as replicas, with @Antonelli questioning the ambiguity in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: @ozas17 (The Seller) highlighted the excellent condition of the 2011 BMW 528i, emphasizing its meticulous maintenance and the appealing features that come with it, such as the original window sticker and new tires. The car has a strong reputation for its performance, thanks to the non-turbocharged N52 engine, which is unique to this model year and known for its reliability. @fotontom praised the vehicle for its size and performance, comparing it favorably to the Toyota Avalon, while noting the comfort and fuel efficiency it offers, with impressive MPG figures. @gavecc shared that his own similar vehicle has proven to be durable and reliable, and acknowledged the temptations offered by this auction due to the low mileage and options available.
Neutral: Several inquiries aimed at gathering more information about the car were noted. @phoaddict asked for clarification regarding the presence of Xenon lights, while @ManualsOnly requested close-up photos of the wheels and detailed videos showcasing various car operations. @slowN54 and @zein raised questions about potential issues, such as warning codes or leaks, while @Fortunateson also asked for a cold start video to assess the engine's condition better. In response, @ozas17 (The Seller) provided updates on video availability and confirmed that there were no warning codes or odors in the vehicle, reassuring potential bidders about the car's state.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed regarding the vehicle's service history and replacement parts. @slowN54 specifically inquired about previous maintenance for critical components like the water pump and suspension, to which @ozas17 replied that there were no available service records but assured that the vehicle was ready for sale. Also noted was @gavecc's mention of having had to replace his transmission, which may lead potential buyers to question the reliability of the transmission in the car being offered. However, the general consensus remained positive about the vehicle itself, despite the uncertainties about service history.
|
 |
Positive: @OceanLad complimented the vehicle, referring to it as a "Beautiful XJL" and inquiring about the Adaptive Cruise Control option. @gmagno praised the car as an "AWESOME CAR!" and noted his familiarity with the early models, suggesting that preventative maintenance is critical for these vehicles. @Rance6 appreciated @Micahs' comprehensive and transparent responses to his questions regarding the car's mileage and servicing history. @Micahs also highlighted that the car was well cared for and had no significant issues apart from a replaced leak detection pump. @Micahs added details about his long experience with Jaguars, which contributed to the trustworthiness of his comments.
Neutral: @Rance6 asked about the vehicle's service history and the date codes on the tires, to which @Micahs promised to provide more information and reassured him about the mileage being acceptable for a well-maintained Jaguar. @ozymandias raised concerns about front suspension components needing replacement in vehicles of this age, but @Micahs stated that the previous owner had maintained the vehicle, ensuring its suspension was sound. @Davebinn and @Golfpl also posed questions about the tire date codes and the presence of Adaptive Cruise Control, which @Micahs answered with his knowledge of the vehicle's features and condition.
Negative: @restcon expressed concerns about the reliability of plastic components in cooling systems, citing that these parts can lead to significant issues regardless of the type of coolant used. He suggested that replacing these with upgraded components is essential for long-term viability. @Car-guy inquired about potential leaks and noise issues, indicating skepticism about the vehicle's history. @restcon also challenged @Micahs to offer a warranty for potential issues related to the vehicle's cooling system and timing chain, suggesting that this would enhance buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the exceptional rarity and condition of the H1 K12, with @WakeupTR noting it as a clean unit perfect for upgrades. @boaboyoz appreciates its unique aesthetics, calling it "wonderful" and "handsome." @Nachtsturm expresses enthusiasm, mentioning he loves the stance and cleanliness of the vehicle, while @bkottner shows strong interest in potentially purchasing in the future, showcasing a high regard for the vehicle's value.
Neutral: Several users seem to acknowledge the vehicle's uniqueness and historical background, with @dlaforgia providing detailed insights about its specifications. They highlight the limited production figures of the K12, mentioning it is not an Alpha model and discussing its military features. @KWF89 shares their personal experience with the truck, having already driven it for a few hundred miles, and plans to consult with an expert in H1 vehicles.
Negative: While many comments are positive, some are more critical regarding the vehicle's desirability. @dlaforgia notes that despite its great color and clean appearance, it may not be a desirable truck due to the unique components that are no longer supported. Users also question the practical aspects of the vehicle, such as @KITZU asking for seat photos, potentially indicating concerns about the interior.
|
 |
Positive: @Koolaidrockss shared a fantastic experience with ToyotaRescueFarm's auction, highlighting the transparency and ease of the process. They expressed satisfaction with their new truck and indicated a strong intent to purchase from the seller again. Other commenters, like @Mr.OGPaint and @hillvalleytoyota, praised the truck's quality and aesthetics, calling it an absolute beauty and well-suited for its purpose. @Laverdude also chimed in with excitement, expressing enthusiasm for the bidding process on such a deserving vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @ToyotaRescueFarm, actively engaged with the community, providing videos of the truck, including a driving video and encouraging potential buyers to reach out for more information. @CentralOregon asked about the truck's interior condition, particularly inquiring about any smoke odors, to which @ToyotaRescueFarm confirmed it was smoke-free and clean inside, addressing concerns proactively. This level of communication appears to contribute positively to the auction environment.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the truck itself; however, @CentralOregon's inquiry about smoke odors reflects a common concern potential buyers might have about a used vehicle. The lack of negative feedback suggests that the truck and the auction process maintained a favorable impression among bidders.
|
 |
Positive: The comments highlight the impressive condition and well-maintained history of the vehicle. ReserveMotorworks emphasized the Cayenne's appealing features like heated and cooled seats, a panoramic sunroof, and a premium sound system. The southern California roots of the car contribute to its clean underside and pristine condition, which further enhance its desirability among potential buyers. The reassurance of completed major services and the invitation for the community to ask questions demonstrate a commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction.
Neutral: Commenters acknowledge the vehicle's California origins, which explain its clean undersides compared to cars from harsher climates. @vvassallo noted their curiosity about the vehicle while in California, indicating a possible interest in bidding. Additionally, @jimbojimbo123 inquired about the tow package, showing that certain practical features are of interest to potential buyers, and suggesting that they are assessing the vehicle's functionality for their needs.
Negative: There was no significant negative feedback provided about the vehicle. However, the query from @jimbojimbo123 implies that potential buyers may have specific requirements, such as the need for a factory tow package, which could be a point of concern for those considering the vehicle primarily for towing purposes.
|
 |
Positive: @HelpMeHelpU describes the vehicle as a timeless classic, noting the similarity in appearance to their own 1995 993 model. @remgitano appreciates the beauty of the 'SC' model, specifically mentioning the helpfulness of the videos showcasing paint imperfections, expressing a willingness to overlook minor flaws for the pride of ownership. @PDXBryan compliments the vehicle, calling it a beauty, while @dicksanderson acknowledges the need for more details on engine repairs and confirms the need for functionality check on the A/C, suggesting general interest in ensuring the car is in good working order.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provides a welcoming introduction to the auction, emphasizing the commitment to smooth and transparent transactions and high customer ratings with suggestions for inspections and logistics assistance. Several commenters, including @aggievic and @David_P, discuss the alignment of the vehicle's engine hood, with @aggievic noting a possible misalignment, and @David_P explaining that this is common in hand-built cars like the 911, indicating that the vehicle's appearance is acceptable. @Fargie raises questions about the front bumper's alignment and interior features, further illustrating customer interest in the condition of specific vehicle parts.
Negative: Some users express concern about the vehicle's condition; @dicksanderson requests details on engine repairs, emission systems, and A/C functionality, which might indicate uncertainty about the vehicle's reliability. @Fargie makes a critical observation that the front bumper appears droopy and asks about potential damage, speaker functionality, and dash condition, while @tff raises multiple questions regarding repaint details and modifications, including the status of the chain tensioners and head studs. Such inquiries reflect a level of scrutiny from potential buyers regarding the car's authenticity and necessary repairs.
|
 |
Positive: @Double-E praises the vehicle as a pinnacle of the WJ years with great color, low miles, and a clean undercarriage. They highlight that this model includes desirable features that were removed in later versions, making it a more attractive option for buyers. @amotorsports also expresses appreciation for customer interest and outlines the vehicle's sourcing and titling process. They assure potential buyers that the vehicle has been well maintained based on their inspections.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in additional information regarding the vehicle's condition, such as @BTC4020 and @BFD requesting more undercarriage photos and pictures of usual wear areas, respectively. @RCraft inquires about the functionality of various components, including blend doors and potential oil leaks. @amotorsports responds positively, confirming that all electronic functions, including heated seats and A/C, operate as they should, and acknowledges the need for more detailed photos.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance records, particularly by @RCraft, who notes that CarFax only shows two oil changes. @BFD and @RCraft also highlight the need for clearer photos of the driver seat and mention that the blend doors need verification. @BFD expresses skepticism about the phrase "in good shape" used to describe the seats, suggesting that visuals are essential for a better assessment. Additionally, @Kenk7880 points out the missing front passenger tow hook cover and questions whether any repairs were done to the front end.
|
 |
Positive: @StyleCars (The Seller) has highlighted the key features of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE Luxury, emphasizing its impressive condition with only 69,000 miles and a clean Carfax history. The vehicle boasts a powerful 5.0L V8 engine, providing reliable performance, and features a sophisticated dual-range transfer case for enhanced capability off-road. Additionally, luxury amenities like Harman Kardon audio, heated steering wheel, and heated seats create a comfortable driving experience, while its aesthetic appeal is enhanced by striking 20-inch wheels and Santorini Black paint.
Neutral: @RJACHICAGO raised a valid concern regarding a 3-year gap in service records for the vehicle. In response, @StyleCars (The Seller) clarified that the vehicle was used sparingly as a secondary car, necessitating less frequent servicing. A full inspection was conducted before listing the car, where significant maintenance work was completed, including servicing the cooling system, front suspension, and brakes, reassuring potential bidders about the vehicle's upkeep.
Negative: Despite the reassurances from @StyleCars (The Seller), @RJACHICAGO's concerns about the cooling tubes, timing chain, and air suspension raised questions about the vehicle's long-term reliability and maintenance history. The seller's response explained that no issues were found with the timing chain and that the air suspension was functioning properly; however, the initial absence of service records might still leave some bidders apprehensive regarding the vehicle's overall maintenance and potential hidden issues.
|
 |
Positive: @GDbears (The Seller) describes the vehicle as amazing and in excellent condition, emphasizing that it drives even better than it looks. The seller expresses enthusiasm about the car's performance and readiness for the next owner, highlighting their pleasure in ownership and willingness to answer any last-minute questions from potential buyers. Additionally, the seller assures that the vehicle has been consistently serviced at a reputable dealership and that all recalls have been addressed promptly, reinforcing its reliability.
Neutral: Several commenters have inquired about specific details regarding the vehicle, including potential damage noted by @SpeedGuzzler and questions about recalls from @Jeffers76. Both @NicoleB and @bovice25 asked about the lien on the vehicle, wanting clarification on the remaining balance owed. @GDbears (The Seller) acknowledges these inquiries and is open to reviewing concerns about the vehicle's condition, as well as providing necessary documentation regarding the lien and title transfer process.
Negative: @Duztenz brings attention to potential concerns about the vehicle's condition with a request for a cold start and driving video, implicitly questioning the car's performance upon startup. However, the seller responds positively, indicating a willingness to provide the requested video but does not directly address any potential issues mentioned by the commenter. Overall, while the seller presents the vehicle positively, the inquiries highlight a degree of caution from buyers regarding the car's physical state and any outstanding issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Wellplayedsir highlighted that the vehicle looks like an early Factory Five Mark 1, which many agreed upon. @BubMullen mentioned the appealing OSHS colors, while @Daverett commented on the roll bar height confirming its Factory Five origins. @philbo427 supported this by pointing out features like the round tube ladder frame and exterior trunk hinges. @1969L88 recalled a positive personal experience from building a similar kit in the 90s, appreciating its performance and balance. @DPatGulfHills (The Seller) also provided additional information on the car’s specs, clarifying horsepower estimations, tire conditions, and the multi-piece wheels, which added to the interest.
Neutral: Various commenters requested more information on the vehicle’s components. For instance, @RDM7533 and @Denmark inquired about tire date codes and whether the rear drum brakes were designed to resemble discs, respectively. @DPatGulfHills (The Seller) addressed these queries and provided insights on the age of tires and the configuration of brakes. @dj_walls2424 offered constructive advice on tagging commenters for better auction engagement, indicating an overall supportive community focused on enhancing the seller's auction effectiveness. Additionally, @DPatGulfHills (The Seller) confirmed the transmission type and indicated all tires should be of a similar age.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the condition of the vehicle. @Bogusracing pointed out a potential crack or scratch around the roll bar hoop, which could impact the vehicle's integrity. @Marka38 speculated about the possibility of wheel adapters, questioning the compatibility stemming from the original 88 donor car. @Sidetrakn asked for details on the wheel spacers and requested a driving video, indicating a desire for assurance regarding the car's performance and handling. These comments reflect a cautious interest in the car's condition and performance, signaling that some buyers may need further convincing regarding the vehicle's reliability and features.
|
 |
Positive: @sernow expressed satisfaction by saying it's really nice, and @JHernandez complimented the truck and inquired about any fluid leaks or transmission issues, indicating a good overall impression of the vehicle. In addition, @HIGHERSPEC, the seller, confirmed that the truck does not leak fluids and that the transmission operates correctly, further supporting a positive perception of the truck's condition.
Neutral: @nealandcrew raised questions about the low mileage of the truck, seeking clarification on how it was used by the grandfather and if it was used for towing. Additionally, @carsandtrucks50 asked for confirmation of the mileage, whether it is 54,000 or possibly 154,000. These inquiries demonstrate a neutral level of curiosity regarding the vehicle's history and usage.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle. However, the questions raised by @nealandcrew and @carsandtrucks50 suggest some skepticism about the mileage and overall usage of the truck, which may imply concerns regarding its condition or history.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, particularly @JackVetter, who described it as a beautiful car and a dream specification. He was contemplating purchasing it as his first fun car, showing his enthusiasm and interest. @baja-d also praised the car, encouraging @JackVetter to reward himself after college if financially feasible, indicating the car's special nature and potential enjoyment. The seller, @NorCalCarGuy530, was responsive to inquiries, providing details about the car's features and tire dates, contributing to a positive impression.
Neutral: @rvia100 inquired about the engine bay video and whether there could be footage of the harmonic balancer. This request highlights the importance of checking specific parts of the car for potential buyers. Additionally, @OnThe405 asked for tire date information, indicating an intent to understand the car's condition better. Overall, these comments reflect a general interest in the vehicle's specifications and the seller's willingness to address those concerns.
Negative: Some comments contained cautionary advice. @Dturtle6 warned @JackVetter to save money for long-term investments, suggesting he focus on education or other financial priorities instead of rushing to buy a car. @OnThe405 echoed this sentiment, cautioning against the depreciating costs associated with car ownership. @notlikelytowin4 expressed dissatisfaction with dealer fees, stating he would rather exit the buying process for this reason, which reflects a critical view of the purchasing experience.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement about the potential of the vehicle, with @Gary_T1 suggesting it's almost ready for street use with minimal modifications. @CKKurtz highlighted the car as a great project for car enthusiasts, particularly teenagers, emphasizing its suitability for a group or family project. Both @trracer and @cwood13 noted the rarity and value of the included four DCOE 42 carburetors, indicating that they could enhance the car's performance significantly.
Neutral: Several comments reflect questions about the vehicle's history and specific components. @AlfaHolic and @12JC inquired about the presence of an SCCA logbook, which would authenticate its competitive history. @Base2476 asked about the rear floor pan needed for installation, and @mcqueens confirmed the inclusion of four Weber Carbs with the sale, aiming to clarify buyer inquiries regarding the condition and history of the vehicle.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle being more of a project than a ready-to-drive car. @Cmara remarked it isn't suited for casual Sunday drives, while @SteelyTim pointed out the lack of response from the selling dealer, implying a possible issue with customer service and support for potential buyers. Additionally, @Super7Driver questioned the clarity in the number of Webers included, hinting at a lack of detailed information in the listing.
|
 |
Positive: @Shawh commented on the car's significance as a piece of Americana and expressed encouragement towards the seller, highlighting the excitement of discovering unique vehicles. @Dollycat3 praised the rarity of the Mercury Monterey S-55 Convertible Z-Code, reflecting appreciation for classic models. @Ranchero65 pointed out that the approaching season is ideal for enjoying such a convertible, suggesting it would be a perfect time to purchase, use it for the season, and later work on it when the weather turns cold.
Neutral: @MGCARS (The Seller) responded to inquiries by offering assistance and providing details about the car's condition. @Skleman inquired about the extent of the rust on the vehicle, prompting @MGCARS to clarify that the only rust is found in the trunk, documented in the pictures provided. Other commenters sought additional information regarding the car's operational status and potential issues, showing a genuine interest in understanding more about the project.
Negative: @MHavnaer asked whether the car runs, indicating a concern about its functionality. @Daggwood raised numerous questions about the car's current state, including concerning the necessity for repairs and the condition of critical vehicle components like brakes, exhausts, and tires, which reflects a cautious approach before committing to the project. It appears there are significant inquiries about potential problems, suggesting some apprehension about taking on the restoration challenge.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are largely impressed with the visual appeal and rarity of the 2011 Cadillac CTS coupe, with @neverenoughgarage noting its superior looks compared to the four-door version, calling it stunning and not dated. @97Stang expresses admiration by calling it beautiful and mentioning it as one of their dream cars. @Jonesy66 shares a personal experience of owning the model and praises its allure and driving pleasure, mentioning the joy of having it in manual transmission. The seller, @FarmerPete, highlights the car's powerful performance and comfort, stating that it is solid and fun to drive, with minor blemishes that do not affect its overall beauty.
Neutral: The seller provides detailed information about the car's features and specifications, including mention of the manual transmission, advanced safety systems, and high-quality equipment such as a Bose sound system and heated seats. @NavyDave inquires about the car's title status, to which @FarmerPete reassures that it is clean and not rebuilt or salvage. @Speedster13 asks if the vehicle includes navigation, but @FarmerPete confirms that it does not, which is additional relevant information regarding the vehicle's specifications, contributing to its overall understanding.
Negative: There are reasonable concerns raised regarding the vehicle's history, specifically @Caseydt who asks about any damages that had been repaired from previous accidents, to which @FarmerPete indicates there is no information available. Additionally, @Jimmy1234 requests clarification on the imperfections noted in the car's photographs and is concerned about a possible bend in the hood, demonstrating buyer caution. @csmbowls also voices questions about the car's maintenance history, particularly regarding oil changes and any issues with the timing chains, reflecting a need for more transparency in the car's service records.
|
 |
Positive: @DHD997 expressed admiration for the car, noting a personal preference for white 968 cabs. @intrick shared a nostalgic memory of owning a similar vehicle and expressed excitement about this listing. @Nesty55 highlighted the car's appealing white color and spec features, while @Darinj recognized the unique color combination and the appeal of this Porsche model. @CSM1234 remarked on how Porsches look great in white, and @Fargie praised the driving experience compared to 911s. The Seller (@P-968) also shared positive sentiments about the car's look and performance, citing good maintenance history and positive interactions with fans of the car.
Neutral: Many commenters expressed a desire for further information, particularly @leftlane11 and @beautyandplay, asking for service histories and specifics on key maintenance like the timing belt and water pump. The Seller, @P-968, provided details on previous ownership, mentioning that the car had been well cared for and was purchased from a reputable dealer. Commenters like @jeff968 noted the rarity of the model and its features, while @Max502 requested additional photos and clarifications regarding the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about potential issues with the vehicle. @Michaelsmacd and @Airworm pointed out discoloration on the instrument panel, while @MichaelCar brought attention to oil possibly leaking from the undertray and requested videos to clarify various operational queries. @TimUrs6Avant speculated on necessary maintenance due to the car's age. @Fargie echoed the desire for organized service records and raised questions about the condition of the dashboard. Overall, there was a mix of enthusiasm for the Porsche alongside caution regarding its age and reported condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Edvert (The Seller) shared that over $17,000 has been invested into refreshing the Jeep, including a new 4.0L engine, clutch, and various components to ensure reliability. Reviewers like @DUGEEEFRESH04 admired the Jeep's appearance and @TowerDawg4u expressed excitement about using it to teach driving. The seller confirmed the Jeep has been dependable, driven for about 10,000 miles post-refresh, and boasts a well-documented service history, ensuring buyers of its quality and care.
Neutral: Comments from users mostly sought clarification regarding the vehicle's history and components. @fsacb3 inquired about the mileage on the replacement engine, while @JeepsterinAz questioned the necessity of the engine replacement considering the typical lifespan of a 4.0 engine. The seller addressed these queries, providing details about the engine's prior mileage and the reasons for replacement due to issues with the original engine. Additional details were given regarding included features such as both sets of doors and tire conditions.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns that may affect buyer perception, notably the mention of 13 previous owners by @DUGEEEFRESH04, which could suggest reliability issues. @Andfred asked about rust on the frame, hinting at potential concerns for future buyers regarding the vehicle's condition. Although @Edvert (The Seller) assured that the frame and undercarriage are in excellent condition and free from significant rust due to its time spent in dry climates, these factors might linger in the minds of potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments express appreciation for the 2011 Mercedes E350 wagon being auctioned, with @Foreignluxury, the seller, showing gratitude to all participants and encouraging open communication regarding questions and concerns. @ActYourAge humorously relays a nostalgia for the vehicle type, highlighting the appealing design elements, further enhancing the positive community atmosphere around the auction. The seller's courteous offers, such as transport at wholesale prices for bidders, contribute to a welcoming environment for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries seek further information about the vehicle's maintenance history and specific components. @MMK-CARS requests service records, to which @Foreignluxury responds by directing them to the attached pictures. @SnookMemphis asks about the replacement of motor mounts, but the seller admits they lack that specific information while assuring the vehicle's regular maintenance is documented. This exchange showcases the informative aspect of the auction process, with the seller aiming to provide clarity without definitive answers.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding certain aspects of the vehicle, notably the mismatched wheels pointed out by @ActYourAge, which prompts apprehensions about additional costs following the purchase. While the seller acknowledges the observation and offers a link for a compatible replacement, @litquidity expresses skepticism about this solution's adequacy, suggesting it does not instill confidence. These critical viewpoints highlight potential red flags for bidders, impacting their overall perception of the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's beauty, with @BRKMarsh describing it as a 'gorgeous car' and others noting its appealing color combination. The seller, @Nitto57, has been proactive in addressing concerns, stating that the car runs well, is registered, insured, and has been regularly serviced without issues. Additionally, @cpa713 acknowledged the car's nice features while inquiring about any potential problems, which indicates a level of appreciation for the vehicle's overall quality.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition and history, particularly from commenters like @kenbaker1265 and @raykosh, who raised important questions about rust, overheating, and the overall state of the car. @EstebanFernandez requested detailed information on various performance metrics, including compression and oil pressure, highlighting that potential buyers are seeking clarity on these technical aspects before making any decisions. The seller responded thoroughly to these requests, providing assurances about the car's condition and maintenance history, which illustrates a level of transparency that potential buyers find valuable.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's past listing and reports of low bids during previous sales attempts. @spotter56 suggested that questions about the rocker panels may have deterred serious buyers, reflecting apprehension regarding the car's condition. Furthermore, @trmurphy4 and @raykosh pointed out potential issues with body repairs and overheating, questioning whether these problems could complicate ownership. The mention of a possible oil leak from the underside by the seller also contributed to a cloud of doubt regarding the car's reliability, making some commenters skeptical about its true value.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the LS400, with many users, including @mpeng510 and @luckidai, celebrating its timeless beauty. @cpa713 praised the rare black-on-black color combination, describing the vehicle as a stunner, while @Schmidlack noted its sublime nature for a 30-year-old classic. Additionally, @HarryMT shared his excitement about participating in the auction, highlighting a personal connection to the car, further emphasizing the vehicle's allure among potential bidders.
Neutral: Some participants sought additional information about the vehicle's features and condition. @Vaquero427 inquired about interior door handles, prompting an informative response from @RetroDriver regarding their material. Queries about the radio display and window tint were raised by @drshawnphd and @dixonsteele, respectively. Meanwhile, @Rhya expressed curiosity about the seller's decision to sell a well-cared-for vehicle, to which the seller acknowledged that it was due to the owner's infrequent driving.
Negative: Several comments raised concerns about specific vehicle features. @drshawnphd expressed worry about the radio display potentially malfunctioning, while @plunderthebooty questioned the performance of its 4-speed transmission compared to a presumed 5-speed option. These inquiries indicate that while many viewed the car positively, there were uncertainties about its mechanical aspects and functionalities.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition and rarity, highlighting its low mileage and excellent preservation. @rdawg420 noted that the car's potential sales price could set records, while @90simportfanboy called it a historic car and expressed eagerness to watch the bidding unfold. @collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized the exceptional care this vehicle has received, asserting it is likely the nicest example of its kind available. They provided detailed maintenance updates, declaring it drives like brand new and stating their confidence in its condition and desirability.
Neutral: Comments from users such as @schemauer and @Garysc sought additional information about the car's maintenance history and trunk photos, indicating curiosity about the specifics of its condition. @journey1x raised questions regarding the car's paint and tire dates, while other users chimed in to express nostalgia for the model, with @AudiB9S4 recalling their first car was similar and praising the vehicle as a beautiful example. @petmitsu pointed out a discrepancy in color naming, which the seller later addressed, showing an overall interest in ensuring accurate representation of the car.
Negative: Some feedback, particularly from @journey1x, raised red flags concerning the lack of service records and the apparent age of the tires, hinting at possible undisclosed issues. They noted various imperfections like paint defects and faults with the radio, indicating a need for cautious consideration from potential buyers. @petmitsu also questioned the seller's handling of maintenance details while other users debated the significant investment required to address aging components, including timing belt concerns, suggesting that these issues could be critical for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the truck's appearance and condition. @Antoniofal praises its beautiful paint job, noting that they could admire it all day. @clngodfrey, the seller, reassures potential buyers about the truck's excellent care and condition, mentioning its lack of smoke odors and the new tires with less than 1,000 miles. Additionally, @JRC99 shares their positive experience with owning a similar model and describes the GTX trucks as unique, highlighting their interesting details and modifications. Overall, the truck is viewed as visually appealing and well-maintained, with potential for a great driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments provide factual insights regarding the truck's specifications and history. @pmbrcb discusses their similar truck and acknowledges the appeal of driving such a vehicle, while @F16Jock inquires about the smoke-free history of the truck. @clngodfrey responds to both queries with clarity about the truck's upkeep and modifications, including the installation of a Magnaflow muffler and functionality of the heat and air conditioning. @bringatrailer informs participants about auction extensions regarding the availability of the seller, ensuring transparency in the sale process. Overall, the comments reflect a mix of interest in the truck's features and logistical aspects of the sale.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the truck's value and reliability. @Greenzo1 questions the worth of an $8,300 package from 2004, implying it might not be justified. @toolmantaylor asks about a potential leak seen in one of the photos, which may suggest concern about the vehicle's maintenance. However, @clngodfrey addresses these concerns by clarifying the absence of leaks and the truck's well-kept condition. Additionally, @JRC99 points out inconsistencies in factory specifications, indicating that the GTX trucks have quirks and that details may vary. This feedback indicates potential apprehension among commenters about authenticity and mechanical integrity, despite the overall positive perception of the truck.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a fantastic Agate Gray Metallic 992.1 cab, calling it totally fab. @MarshallGoldman (The Seller) shares insights on the well-optioned 992.1 Cabriolet, emphasizing its appeal during peak driving season, especially with its timeless Agate Gray color. He notes that well-specified cars continue to attract attention and maintain their value, highlighting the vehicle's performance and usability balance.
Neutral: @RatherJaded provides a cautionary perspective about the Porsche market, suggesting that there may be a decrease in production and that prices for pre-owned 992.1 and 992.2 units could rise by Summer 2026. @981gt4BAT counters this by claiming that Porsche will produce as many cars as they can sell, discussing the new models expected and expressing optimism about the market's normalization. @MarshallGoldman (The Seller) acknowledges the mixed feelings about the current state of the market, indicating that while there is softening in non-GT 992 cars, desirable models retain their allure.
Negative: @981gt4BAT criticizes the notion that the market is slowing, arguing that Porsche's production is based on demand for profits. Conversely, @RatherJaded describes a slowdown in the market for non-GT models, with new 992.2 inventory not moving quickly and some dealers accumulating stock without sales. This view illustrates concerns about potential dealer losses as cars remain unsold, suggesting that the market could be moving towards a period of overproduction.
|
 |
Positive: @PrincePorsche93 provided thorough answers to @WJW9075's inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. The seller clarified that the valve stem seal job was completed at 58,000 miles, with no smoke issues noted. They also confirmed that the coolant transfer pipe was replaced at 63,643 miles, addressing a potential area of concern for buyers. Another commenter, @flatman, praised the car as a wonderful touring vehicle and acknowledged that the expensive maintenance issues were already managed, making the car an enticing option. The seller further showcased the car's well-maintained interior by mentioning that the dashboard was repaired and covered with genuine black suede, matching the vehicle's aesthetic.
Neutral: @sail121j raised a question about the common issue of cracked dashboards in these models, expressing concern over the lack of clear photos to assess the condition of the dash. The seller responded by acknowledging the problem but reassured that the cracking was minimal due to the car being garaged most of its life. They offered to send clearer images later, highlighting the step taken to restore it alongside the car's overall maintenance history. @phoaddict also requested more photos of the dash and the service records from Debold Auto, demonstrating a proactive interest in the vehicle's documented maintenance history.
Negative: @sail121j pointed out the potentially severe cracks in the dashboard, suggesting a lack of clarity in the provided images, which could deter interested buyers. @phoaddict expressed disappointment over the inability to retrieve detailed service records from Debold Auto, which could enhance buyer confidence regarding the vehicle's history. This points to some concerns over the transparency of the vehicle's maintenance records and condition, as potential buyers seek assurance about past repairs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting features such as its beautiful design and luxurious driving experience. @WLACA praised its comfort and performance, noting it transitions smoothly from a grand tourer to a supercar when desired. @Gryphon12 described the overall driving experience as spectacular, combining comfort and style, while @P0rsche956 affirmed that the C variant is a favorite for its performance and top-down driving pleasure.
Neutral: Comments revealed a mix of inquiries and suggestions regarding the vehicle's specifications and condition. @cdmotor1532 sought clarification on the front plate mount and taillights, while @Rickybean asked about the vehicle's mileage and service history. @mfriedNY, the seller, responded with detailed information, confirming the car's original specifications and maintenance, including the condition of the battery and tires and the presence of two keys.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about potential issues with the car. @Rickybean questioned the originality of the tires and the existence of any scrapes or marks, to which @mfriedNY confirmed the car was in excellent condition but did acknowledge a minor mark on the bumper from a pebble. @TheGuesser mentioned personal dislikes, such as the red calipers and the car's location in New York, indicating it could be a barrier for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Hoppy18 describes the vehicle as a "blue beast" and appreciates the large hood, complimenting it with humor. @Dmeyer praises the build quality, custom features, and the appealing blue paint, though he questions the exposed flywheel. @Bernard2170 (The Seller) also shares that the car is a unique, high-performance 1968 Mustang Fastback GT 500 that's won multiple awards, expressing confidence in its performance with over 800hp.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Los86 and @KAMZ, acknowledge the car's aesthetic appeal while expressing reservations about the hood's design, suggesting alternatives or modifications that could enhance the vehicle's appearance. The comments reflect a mix of admiration for the vehicle and concern over particular features, like the giant blind spot from the hood and the exposed flywheel.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's oil pressure gauge were raised by @Mharnick, indicating possible issues that were downplayed by the seller, @Bernard2170, who confirmed that the gauge works but was not correctly hooked up. @KAMZ emphasized that while the car is visually appealing, the hood detracts from its overall look. There is a clear divide in opinion regarding the vehicle's appearance based on the hood's design.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle. @ragman remarked on its status as a 'driver' rather than a 'trailer queen', while @Longmire45 called it a 'COOL Chevelle'. @hairyolds complimented its appearance, suggesting that a working A/C system would enhance its appeal. @Sttmcc vouched for its solid condition after seeing it in person. The seller, @zeus122395, also emphasized the car's durability and solid frame, noting that it was factory undercoated, which has helped it endure over the years. The presence of original parts and its big block engine further contributed to the car's attractiveness to prospective buyers, as highlighted through various comments.
Neutral: Comments in the neutral category primarily sought clarification about the vehicle's condition, specifically regarding potential issues such as rust and A/C functionality. @Nebraska402 inquired about visible rust and structural integrity, while several others, including @Chrismt714 and @Nebraska402 again, requested detailed photographs of specific components, such as the trunk and inner rockers. @zeus122395, the seller, was proactive in addressing these queries, taking additional photos to assure potential buyers of the car's condition. The exchanges between commenters and the seller reflect a level of interest in understanding the vehicle better without any outright negativity.
Negative: A few negative comments pointed out concerns regarding the car's condition. @Nebraska402 noted a possible oil leak in some pictures, and another commenter, @Vango1964, questioned the legitimacy of the car being a true Super Sport without a build sheet, which could undermine its value. Additionally, @Henderson55 asked about the absence of an SS gauge cluster, implying a defect in authenticity. These comments highlight the caution some buyers expressed while evaluating the vehicle, emphasizing the importance of rust management and confirmed specifications.
|
434-Mile 2023 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Widebody Jailbreak
2C3CDZC91PH520394
Lot 237711
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Asalvadore442 praised the vehicle by calling it 'bad ass' and stating that it looks great. This positive perception implies that the aesthetics of the car are impressive and appealing to potential buyers.
Neutral: There were inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and clarity on some of the confusion surrounding its model. @Viper96GTSv10 asked for clarification on whether the car is a Redeye or a Jailbreak Hellcat, while @Rover123 requested an image of the emissions sticker under the hood. @derekcarder provided detailed explanations about the vehicle's features and clarified the confusion by explaining the different engines and options available for the 2023 models, including the power ratings and the differences in trim.
Negative: Comments highlighted some discrepancies in the listing details. @Brs25 noted that the car appears to be a regular Hellcat rather than a Redeye, as indicated by specifics such as the valve covers being orange and the lack of red eye emblems. Moreover, @derekcarder had to correct the horsepower rating mentioned in the write-up after initial confusion, indicating it is 717 hp and not the higher figures previously suggested. This back-and-forth indicates some potential misrepresentation or misunderstanding about the vehicle's attributes.
|
2017 Harley-Davidson Softail Fat Boy S by Orange County Choppers
1HD1JT914HC013356
Lot 237670
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Cheth20 commented on the bike's appearance, describing it as a comfortable-looking OCC bike, which highlights its aesthetic appeal and suggests it may provide a pleasant riding experience.
Neutral: @Classyfellow expressed regret about having recently purchased a Softail Deluxe, indicating a positive impression of the OCC bike but focusing on personal circumstances rather than the vehicle itself.
Negative: @bryce2003 raised a concern about the oil pan possibly leaking, citing the presence of oil on the ground in the photos. In response, @Dmiller227 (The Seller) clarified that the substance was not oil but water from recently washing the bike.
|
Supercharged, 40k-Mile 1991 Ford Mustang GT Hatchback 5-Speed
1FACP42E3MF105469
Lot 237713
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commenting on the vehicle, @beach2771 appreciate its beauty, mentioning that it has a great color and is very clean. @AzGuy99 praises its looks but expresses a preference for earlier turbine wheels. @shrackracing appreciates the car's originality, highlighting a range of components, particularly the supercharger setup that enhances performance. Commenters like @Mwilson7 and @Sportsfann emphasize their admiration for the car in its current, modified state, while @NVGT350 and @p1_motorcars_ltd acknowledge the car's excellent build and nostalgic value. Many comments reflect a strong sense of nostalgia and admiration for its ride quality and modifications, making it a desirable choice for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters seek or provide additional information about the vehicle's specifications and performance. @Skyman81 asks about the car's cooling system and clutch condition, while @leo23k inquires about several components, including the oil leak's source and the presence of subframe connectors. Others express curiosity about the modifications and their impact on the car's daily drivability, including a potential return to stock configuration as indicated by @LeeMHurst. The seller, @BF_Pirece, answers many of these inquiries, confirming existing features and conditions, showcasing a communicative interaction between the seller and potential buyers.
Negative: Some opinions highlight areas of concern regarding the vehicle. @gouldbri questions the source of an oil leak, indicating it could stem from the oil pan or rear main seal, while @Zeusmonster and @leo23k emphasize the need for some maintenance, including brake and gasket replacements. Commenters like @Frankieballs jokingly refer to the car's supercharger sounds in a less flattering light. Concerns about emissions standards in California are also raised, with @NVGT350 and @Zeusmonster mentioning the vehicle's non-operation status to bypass smog certification for potential buyers, indicating potential challenges for California residents. Overall, while enthusiasm and admiration for the car prevail, there are notes of caution regarding maintenance and regulatory issues.
|
3,800-Mile 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Carbon Fiber Track Pack
1FA6P8SJ9L5502920
Lot 237718
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Mysnake1969 describes the vehicle as a great example of a 2020 GT500 in an awesome color combo, while @fouroheight68 praises its beauty and mentions being a neighbor with a GT350. @Plywood222222 finds the car absolutely stunning and is pleased to see it used at least a little bit, wishing the seller good luck with the transaction. @TheMightyReds92 confirms with @Thundermoose that the car has been used and expresses interest since it appears to have been nicely warmed up.
Neutral: @71Cars asks questions regarding the roll-bar's color and the number of track miles, indicating interest in the vehicle's performance history. @TheMightyReds92 points out confusion over the ownership details listed in the car's description, noting discrepancies with the Carfax report. @TonyOsborn (The Seller) responds to queries by clarifying that there was indeed one previous owner and acknowledges a typo in the listing.
Negative: @TheMightyReds92 expresses skepticism regarding the car's ownership history, raising concerns about the information provided in the listing. While the comments generally reflect interest in the vehicle, this particular concern indicates doubts about transparency from the seller. There is no overt negative feedback about the car itself, but the mention of the owner count may cast a shadow over its perceived value.
|
 |
Positive: @mikesclassiccars (The Seller) describes the Bronco as a vehicle that runs and drives as good as it looks, highlighting its modern touches that enhance the driving experience and make it a crowd-pleaser. @MontanaBroncos praises the color combination and notes the mechanical upgrades while maintaining the original uncut appearance, contributing to its appeal. @Cammergalaxie expresses agreement with the positive sentiment, calling the vehicle almost perfect with all necessary features included.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions around specific technical details and modifications of the vehicle. @Todd_Z mentions the lack of 'heavy-duty rear trailing arms' as claimed, instead noting the presence of Duff long arms in the front suspension, which he finds interesting. @stevenbrooten provides additional context about the transition period of the Bronco's front end, while @highgeer raises a question about the fuel tank size, suggesting it's an aftermarket model as well.
Negative: Comments also include some critiques and expressions of doubt regarding the vehicle's auction price and condition. @donkeybackpunch expresses skepticism about the reserve price being unrealistic, and @timberframe doubts it will sell for the listed price. @reinvnt requests the removal of what they consider an unattractive steering wheel cover, indicating a potential flaw in the vehicle's presentation. Additionally, @Low-LightGhia mentions a driving video that raises questions about the sound, leading to a clarification from @mikesclassiccars (The Seller) regarding the perceived noise.
|
 |
Positive: Comments reflect excitement about the vehicle's performance, particularly regarding its powerful engine. @Thank whoever thought of this from me expresses enthusiasm, stating that it is 'really cool' and highlights the effective fitment of the 7.3 engine in the truck. @mschmaltz332 (The Seller) contributes to this positivity by noting that the vehicle sounds good at idle and offers a running video link in the comments to further showcase its capabilities. There is a general sense of admiration for how well the vehicle has been put together.
Neutral: Several comments focus on technical observations, especially regarding the vehicle's components and specifications. @Mercury88 mentions the compatibility of the new engine with existing transmission designs, affirming its fitment and sharing insights about the Toyo Proxy tire installation. @MPETESS10 corroborates this information, discussing engine dimensions and suggesting that the vehicle's performance setup could be impressive. These aspects provide a balanced view on the mechanical aspects without strong positive or negative sentiment.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the vehicle's transmission in some comments. @RockyGTR questions whether the transmission has been rebuilt and how it handles power, indicating potential uncertainty about the vehicle's reliability under performance conditions. Additionally, @KZN185Surf suggests a need for a video of the truck running, which may imply a desire for further verification of its running condition. @Lightning’s not fast enough proposes adding more horsepower, hinting at dissatisfaction with the current engine output and suggesting a need for enhancements.
|
 |
Positive: @SwissBliss comments on the vehicle's attractive appearance, reminiscing about their own past experiences with a 70 Torino convertible, indicating that this car is a desirable model. @FordNutt expresses nostalgia, sharing that their father owned a similar Torino GT, highlighting its unique configuration and specifications. @sng302 appreciates the distinctive hood scoop of the car, implying a positive sentiment about its aesthetic features.
Neutral: @nine17K inquires about the type of engine the vehicle has, specifically asking whether it is a Cleveland or Windsor model, showing interest in the mechanical aspects without expressing a clear opinion. @mcqueens, the seller, provides a straightforward answer confirming that it is a Cleveland motor, sharing specific details about its features such as the valve covers and thermostat placement. @corvettom9 asks technical questions regarding the engine’s pistons and any necessary repairs, suggesting a focus on the vehicle's condition rather than emotional involvement.
Negative: @hairyolds critiques the choice of shifters in the car, suggesting that there should have been a consistency in the shifter design. @FordNutt comments on the unfortunate state of the vehicle needing extensive paint and body work, noting that this kind of work can be quite costly. This highlights a downside of the car's current condition and the potential investment needed for restoration.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg describes the interior of the Cullinan as "tastefully done" and "magnificent," highlighting the elegance of the design. @Dollycat3 shares their enthusiasm for the Cullinan Black Badge, calling it "absolutely phenomenal and beautiful." @Hoppy18 expresses admiration for the vehicle's performance during inclement weather, playfully referencing their partner's reactions to its cost, while @MarshallGoldman, the seller, appreciates the engaging discussion and is open to answering any questions about the car's special specifications. @Lukishib also emphasizes the vehicle's features in a positive light, suggesting that the inclusion of a wine carafe is a luxury that can be enjoyed with non-alcoholic drinks too.
Neutral: @apooster raises a practical concern about whether the back seat can accommodate a rear-facing infant car seat. @Jfuchs expresses a preference for more amenities in the rear, such as tray tables or entertainment systems, noting that the current offerings are lacking. @TJClassic points out the repetitive mentions of the "Shooting Star headliner" in the description, questioning its emphasis. Meanwhile, @tlcamg and @Jfuchs discuss the liquor arrangement in the rear seating, weighing its implications in light of legal considerations, and whether it affects their interest in the vehicle.
Negative: @Spider_Mike discusses the "Shooting Star headliner" while also expressing concern about how the luxury vehicle features may be perceived, casting doubt on its practicality. @TJClassic's critique of the vehicle's portrayal reflects a sentiment that the seller could have better highlighted its features instead of relying on repetitiveness. @Lukishib expresses frustration about negative reactions surrounding the inclusion of liquor features, urging commenters to appreciate the car's remarkable qualities instead of focusing on unrelated controversies. @BMWE90Guy shares skepticism towards the value proposition of spending over $300k on any car, indicating a divide in perceptions of luxury vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @70_duster praised the car as one of the most comfortable ever built. @Searle804 expressed a growing desire to own one of these unique vehicles, appreciating its distinctive features. @GGR mentioned the effectiveness of the 2.3L engine paired with a 5-speed transmission, making it pleasurable for highway driving. @sasvos (The Seller) noted that the car has been well cared for, having been a garage queen throughout its life in the USA, which adds to its appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: A mix of opinions emerged regarding details of the vehicle with @kling.klang confirming that Paul Vos was indeed the owner who brought the car from South Africa, and @paulzg clarifying the accuracy of the wheel covers. @Frenchbuff offered insights on the engine's clacking noise and possible sources of issues, while @PeterE addressed the radiator hole's potential severity based on its placement. The seller, @sasvos, provided additional clarification on the car's background, maintenance history, and condition details, which helped paint a more comprehensive picture.
Negative: Concerns were raised primarily by @Deeler1, who noted several issues including loud engine noises, a significant hole in the radiator, and inconsistencies in the model year listed in the ad. Other commentors like @Frenchbuff and @MARTY_ROTH pointed out specific mechanical concerns, such as the engine overflow tank possibly causing noise and the need for proper grounding of the carburetor to prevent fire hazards. @Deeler1 expressed hesitance to pursue the car given these potential costly repairs, highlighting a level of uncertainty that could deter buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the Marlin Blue Mustang as absolutely rare and magnificent, while @PetrolLounge (The Seller) asserts that the color should have been a standard for Mustangs, emphasizing its stunning appearance. @66R08T finds the Mustang beautiful, and @ChasinFords, a former owner of several fastbacks, agrees on the beauty of the blue color. Comments from @GregP1962 and @Micro912 indicate that the color is impressive, with @GregP1962 mentioning the authenticity of the data plate and @Micro912 expressing surprise at the rarity of the factory color.
Neutral: @Nankaroad inquires about the repainting timeline of the car, and @crowbush asks for details regarding the extent of repairs from an accident. In response, @PetrolLounge explains that images of the damage aren't available, and they confirm the restoration was completed after the repair. @JJeffLaForce defends the installation of '68 buckets for comfort, with @dmeyer agreeing based on their experience. There is discussion about the car's stereo system, with @Thomas54 noting the rarity of the AM radio with a subwoofer.
Negative: @JGE71 expresses distaste for the added speakers, questioning why they were included in a classic car and stating it is a minor issue amidst the overall beauty of the fastback. @The_other_Boris raises concern about potential fuel stains on the tank, while @sourdough seeks clarification regarding the condition of tires and adjustments on the trunk. @eldonchas raises concerns about possible rust, for which @PetrolLounge reassures that there are no signs of rust on the car.
|
 |
Positive: @Jayroyal expressed appreciation for the vehicle, mentioning that the seller understands their customer base, even if the color might not be to their personal taste. @WheelHouseExotics (The Seller) appears responsive and open to questions, offering potential buyers the opportunity to contact them directly for any clarifications they might need.
Neutral: Several comments indicate curiosity or speculation about the vehicle's condition. @SydneyB88 pointed out a part that seems disconnected, leading to a discussion about its purpose. @p0tential proposed that it could be the linkage for the sway bar and referenced a previous auction for comparison. @WheelHouseExotics (The Seller) remained communicative, showcasing a willingness to provide information about the vehicle's maintenance history, such as the oil change, and addressed miscellaneous inquiries from commenters.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's pricing and condition emerged from @luv2sleep1985, who felt that $50,000 for a vehicle that has been resold so frequently felt steep. @Generodis noted potential maintenance issues like overdue oil change and questioned discoloration on the exhaust. Additionally, @Benz_Barn raised alarms over mileage inconsistencies reported on the Carfax and dead pixels on the odometer, seeking further clarification from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the unique F8 Green Metallic color, with @CarCrazyRDM calling it the best on a Trackhawk and noting its potential for a strong auction result due to its stock, low mileage condition. @berryo (The Seller) highlighted the rarity of this color, stating that only six Trackhawks were produced in this shade for 2019. Other commenters, such as @Max1mpact and @davidneidell, complimented the truck's overall aesthetics and performance, with @davidneidell adding that this specific green looks deep and attractive in person. Overall satisfaction with the vehicle's features and performance was evident, as many found it to be an amazing and enjoyable drive.
Neutral: Several comments provided useful details about the vehicle's features and modifications without strong opinions. @berryo noted that the truck has been lowered with Eibach springs and, while including the stock springs for the buyer, he disclosed that he had replaced the brake pads to reduce brake dust. Comments about security concerns for Trackhawks were also shared, particularly due to their being high-value targets for thieves, with various security systems discussed. @C2RMGM and others exchanged security tips, mentioning their personal experiences with theft and recommended solutions, including the Ravelco and IGLA systems, but opinions varied on the effectiveness of these options.
Negative: Some negative feedback revolved around security issues, with @C2RMGM sharing a personal story of having his previous Trackhawk stolen. He criticized the LoJack system for being ineffective, while @Queuedcars conveyed skepticism about the Ravelco system, asserting that it has been defeated in various instances. Concerns were also raised about the infotainment screen's delamination, a common issue with Trackhawks, which @berryo acknowledged in a video. Although @berryo provided information on potential fixes, such as aftermarket replacement screens, the repeated mention of these issues had a slightly negative impact on the overall perception of the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @mikeor describes the first year of the E89 as better looking than its predecessor, praising the 30i engine for its longevity and lack of expensive turbo repairs. @NextLife also shares positive sentiments, calling these cars wonderful and a hidden gem, expressing admiration for the overall look of the seller's vehicle. @nowskiii points out the attention to detail in the car's presentation, noting that the owner went the extra mile by showcasing the cleanliness of less visible areas, emphasizing the car's rust-free condition compared to others.
Neutral: @camlaur80 (The Seller) welcomes potential buyers and encourages questions about the car, providing a clear background of the vehicle's service history and maintenance. The seller explains that they have kept the car garage stored, with significant recent maintenance including a new clutch, struts, and a cooling system refresh. They detail the absence of any check engine lights and a thorough maintenance history, stating that the car is in excellent mechanical shape with the original paint and a few minor cosmetic imperfections.
Negative: @Mike6613 raises a concern about the existing lien on the car and the process of transferring ownership, seeking assurance on how it would be resolved. @derrick28 inquires about potential issues the car might have, highlighting a concern for transparency in the sale. The seller addresses this by stating that there have been no issues, but the request for additional disclosures signals a demand for transparency that might worry other prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @petko20 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the bike, stating that it has been well done and receives compliments everywhere it goes. @sperlz remarks that it is a beautiful looking bike, while @CMC300M adds that it is "one cool looking bike." @SatchyMoto also agrees, exclaiming that the bike is "dang that's cool." Overall, the comments highlight the vehicle's appealing aesthetics and the excitement surrounding it.
Neutral: The seller, @petko20, is actively engaged and responsive to inquiries from potential buyers, providing information about the auction and the bike's features. He mentions that the bike is wired for a trickle charger and a fitted cover will be included, which adds to its appeal. @911_M5_Dino asks about the reason for selling the bike, indicating interest but also seeking clarity about the bike's condition.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, @911_M5_Dino raises a concern about the bike's front tire, suggesting that it is rotating in the wrong direction. This indicates a potential issue that could affect performance or safety, contrasting with the otherwise enthusiastic remarks about its appearance. The inquiry into both the reason for selling and the tire condition suggests some scrutiny, which could be a point of consideration for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its great design and historical significance. @GDogg calls it a 'Great looking Town Car,' while @stugottz shares fond memories of owning a similar model, describing it as a beautiful ride. @Longmire45 appreciates the original window sticker and blue leather interior, deeming it an inviting aspect of the car's appeal. The consensus among many seems to be that the car offers a blend of nostalgia and practicality.
Neutral: @CIsaacson (The Seller) actively engages with the comments, providing information about the car's condition and history. They confirm that the car runs well and has passed smog tests, reassuring potential buyers about its reliability. Furthermore, they address inquiries about the tires and the repainting of the front fender, offering transparency regarding the vehicle's upkeep and modifications.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming positivity, some comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's condition. @Tustin4 questions potential rust on the roof, while @DeanBob inquires about mismatched paint and AC issues. @Smilinpat raises concerns regarding the California smog requirement, indicating some transaction complexities that could be perceived as negative aspects for buyers. Altogether, these comments highlight a cautious approach from some buyers, focusing on potential flaws.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments expressed high enthusiasm for the Nissan Silvia, with @LizardHands praising the quality of work done by JDM Legends, deeming it an extremely nice vehicle. @Calamari_Jujutsu described it as an absolute beauty that brings joy, showcasing the admiration fans have for the car. @blackbird2a also shared a passionate desire for the car, calling it a dream come true, emphasizing its beauty and import status. Additional comments from @ohiolion highlighted the excellent care and meticulous maintenance of the car, assuring potential buyers of its quality.
Neutral: The seller @FridaysMotors provided clarifications regarding the car's features, confirming that it is 'audioless' from the factory but still wired for audio, which addressed @kst243's question. @e30bruhh inquired about the paint condition, to which the seller responded that the car has its original paint and detailed the polishing done upon import. @Eibarra79 confirmed that the vehicle is titled in Montana and that the transfer will be straightforward, indicating logistical aspects of the sale.
Negative: There were minimal negative comments, but @rgordillo expressed confusion about the timing of maintenance, questioning whether it was done in July 2024. This reflects some clarity needed regarding service timelines. Additionally, @David_P asked if Silvias were sold in any LHD markets, indicating a potential obstacle for buyers who may prefer different driving configurations. However, the seller addressed these queries positively, assuring buyers of the car's condition and details.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express interest in the vehicle, noting that the seller is responsive and willing to provide more information. @goc2001, the seller, offers to upload a video showing the navigation screen's functionality for @renzoid and clarifies details about the engine rebuild for @stewey19, indicating transparency regarding the repairs made. @bmccor2 is eager to inspect the vehicle in person and receives a prompt reply from the seller, showcasing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters discuss the vehicle's condition and history, with @tdott raising questions about when the engine damage occurred and if the car was operational before repairs. @DrFerry1 inquires about the Electronic Damper Control shock absorbers, noting some inconsistencies in the vehicle photos related to missing components. Commenters like @e92hoffmeister and @charlie93 share skepticism regarding the vehicle's value and status as a car worthy of consideration.
Negative: There are apparent concerns about the vehicle's past and current condition. @e92hoffmeister comments on the loss of significant features from previous listings, expressing doubt over the reasons behind the need for an engine replacement. Others, like @nyck122 and @jiggysnitz, critique the auction process on Bat and comment on the lack of bidding activity, implying that the vehicle's history and the mystery surrounding it may deter potential buyers. @Providencia voices dissatisfaction with the quality of listings, suggesting that the marketplace is accepting subpar vehicles, which reflects negatively on the car in question.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the car, highlighting features such as its beautiful design and fantastic specifications. @Bidz86 called it a "beautiful Boxster," while @AndyL215 praised the overall build quality and the effective modifications, suggesting that the car could simply use BMC air filters to be complete. Additionally, @Tachycardia noted the desirability of the PDK transmission, implying it would perform well in the market, showing general positivity towards the vehicle's features and aesthetics.
Neutral: Some comments sought clarification on specific details of the car, such as the necessity of a DME report, the specifics of the seating options, and emissions compliance. @Glenn930 and @JK90272 asked about the original exhaust system and its compatibility with California emissions regulations. @Bidz86 and @MMonear requested further information on whether the car still has catalytic converters, indicating that while interested, they needed more information to make a purchasing decision. Questions about the car's interior features and photography quality for the listing also cropped up, demonstrating a moderate level of concern about presentation and clarity.
Negative: A few commenters raised potential issues regarding the car's emissions compliance, particularly related to aftermarket exhaust components. @JK90272 was confused by conflicting statements about the car's emissions status, citing a lack of clarity in the listing details. @Rhayner expressed concern that aftermarket exhaust might not comply with California’s stringent emissions laws, while @Glenn930 noted potential noise issues with the after-market exhaust based on reports of drone sounds, which could be a drawback for some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 1970 Triumph Spitfire, highlighting its beauty and classic appeal. @mikeor referred to it as a 'beauty,' while @Chesapeake noted its good looks and emphasized how the wheels enhance its appearance. Additionally, @billyblyth shared his positive experience with a similar model, praising the car's handling and suggesting it as a great option for first-time British sports car buyers. @Oldhockyplayr reminisced about the joy of driving a Spitfire, declaring it an absolute blast.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects and inquiries regarding the vehicle. @LewisSainous questioned the vehicle's transmission setup, noting that the reverse shifter seemed out of place for a typical 1970 model. The seller, @hrmb79, acknowledged the uncertainty about the transmission history and welcomed expert opinions on the matter. @Crode posed technical questions about how the overdrive is engaged and confirmed the reverse location, which the seller clarified effectively.
Negative: While most comments were positive or neutral, there were concerns about the vehicle's transmission and shift pattern. @LewisSainous pointed out the discrepancy in the shifting pattern from what is standard for a 1970 US market Spitfire. This raised questions about whether the car's transmission had been swapped at some point, leading to some uncertainty about its history. Despite these issues, the overall sentiment remained optimistic about the car's condition and driving experience.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH noted that it is exciting to see a nice pickup truck available for $22,000, highlighting the value of the vehicle. The presence of the original window sticker adds to the vehicle's authenticity and appeal, making it more attractive to potential buyers.
Neutral: @seller received a suggestion for improvement regarding the listing. It was recommended that they include more undercarriage shots to provide buyers with a better understanding of the truck's condition and to enhance the overall listing quality.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @Good53deal (The Seller) has been very responsive and helpful throughout the auction process, demonstrating a willingness to answer all questions from potential buyers. Notably, they provided detailed dimensions of the vehicle and its bed size, showcasing their transparency. Their engagement with commenters such as @buyingformywife and @crocknut has created a positive atmosphere, promoting trust and excitement about the auction.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the vehicle's specifications and features without expressing strong opinions. For example, @buyingformywife inquired about the vehicle's dimensions, while @winnengel asked if the stock wheels were included. @keinescheisse brought up the topic of heating, confirming that it is heat-only, and @miggy31 requested a driving video. The seller's responses helped to clarify these queries, ensuring potential buyers had the necessary information to consider their bidding options.
Negative: There were no specific negative comments regarding the vehicle itself in the provided discussions. However, some comments indicated inquiries about potential concerns such as fitting the vehicle in a garage, which could suggest worries about size. Nonetheless, the seller addressed all queries constructively, mitigating potential negative perceptions and reinforcing a positive seller-buyer interaction.
|
 |
Positive: @80sDude shares a nostalgic view of Saturn vehicles, recalling the fun times spent driving them during college. They mention the comfort and solid build of Saturn sedans, emphasizing a fond connection with the brand's distinctive interior scent.
Neutral: @vfnrcc (The Seller) provides an introduction to the vehicle, expressing enthusiasm for its sale and highlighting the extensive experience and care involved in selecting vehicles for presentation. They reassure potential buyers of the transparency and thoroughness involved in the listing process, reassuring them of the car's impeccable condition.
Negative: @Rich_Truett critiques the vehicle, claiming it was part of Saturn's decline, as GM began using Saturn badges on cars that did not embody the brand's original spirit. They describe the model as unsuccessful and unremarkable, echoing sentiments about the loss of Saturn's identity over time. @vfnrcc (The Seller) acknowledges this perspective, recognizing that while the Saturn L200 may not be a terrible car, it lacks the unique qualities that initially distinguished Saturn models.
|
 |
Positive: @labman praised the vehicle for its appealing specifications, noting the carbon fiber elements and the attractive factory two-tone design. @boaboyoz described the car as a 'Rosso Corsa rockstar,' indicating a strong admiration for its aesthetic. @stad0042 also complimented the excellent color combination and options, calling it a beautiful car.
Neutral: In response to @KBard21's inquiry about potential issues with the vehicle's underside, @luzsicza (The Seller) clarified that the car has not been used on a track and assured that the wear was not unusual. @luzsicza also stated that there have been no problems with the driving mode or the buttons inside the car. Commenters exchanged questions about past services and the state of the car, with @dannynguyendds asking about the service performed just a month apart and @paulstanco seeking clarity about the condition of the interior buttons.
Negative: @Rebar56 expressed confusion over the second picture of the car, questioning what was wrong with the hood, although @zarcherinok suggested it was just an odd angle. @KBard21 raised concerns about the underside of the car, implying potential damage from track use, while @paulstanco shared his frustrations about sticky buttons in luxury cars, seeking assurance that this wouldn't be an issue with the current vehicle. Overall, there were questions regarding the maintenance history and the appearance of wear that may concern prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Nhdika appreciates the aesthetic of the car, noting it looks nice and similar in condition to another vehicle he owns. @RockyVolvo89 expresses admiration for the low mileage and suggests it should go to a true enthusiast who will maintain it well. @quatah refers to it as an "amazingly clean example" and is interested in maintenance recommendations, while @benzog considers it a solid classic investment. Overall, many comments reflect a positive sentiment regarding the vehicle's appearance and perceived value.
Neutral: @argosy (The Seller) gives detailed answers about the car's history, mentioning it was owned by an elderly person since new and that maintenance records exist on CarFax but not in paper form. The seller responds to inquiries about the accident history, emphasizing that the vehicle has a clear title with no evidence of current or prior significant damage. Questioners often ask for clarifications, such as regarding the armrest being original equipment and concerns about the timing belt replacement, reflecting a mix of curiosity and cautious interest.
Negative: @Califpete raises concerns regarding the title status due to the car being declared a total loss in 2011, questioning whether it would carry a salvage title. @vintage_volvo questions the seller's decision not to replace the timing belt, citing potential reliability issues for future owners. @Old_Ned expresses skepticism about the car's service records, especially concerning the timing belt, and comments on a broken brake light cover which could distract. Overall, there are apprehensions about the car's history and potential future issues if not addressed.
|
 |
Positive: The @MohrImports team expressed excitement about offering the 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph with no reserve and highlighted its incredible comfort and smooth driving experience. They provided reassurance about the vehicle's general condition through their photo and video galleries. @Batman1961 noted the interior's excellent quality and minimal wear, likely due to being garaged in a climate-controlled environment, making it one of the best features of the car. This sentiment was echoed by @E39drvrscar, who appreciated the detail in the walk-around video provided by the seller.
Neutral: Several commenters raised questions regarding the vehicle’s history and mechanical condition, specifically referring to past incidents and damage. Notably, @Lyonsvee inquired about the severity of repairs conducted after an accident, while @Keebler.12 and others asked about the vehicle's service records, tire age, and whether the leather had been dyed. @redram pointed out potential issues with battery registration and service updates, noting the complexity surrounding the warning lights displayed on the dashboard and their implications for California emissions requirements.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition mainly focused on its inability to pass California emissions tests due to illuminated warning lights. @Sparrownaut mentioned that without resolving the check engine light, the car could not pass smog inspections. @mike1484 and @schlauchg expressed skepticism about the seller's ability to provide a current smog certificate, fearing potential complications during or after the sale. Additionally, @Batman1961 commented on the car's deferred maintenance indicating possible costly repairs, contributing to apprehensions among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters express their appreciation for the car's design and color. @mintonb mentions it as his 'dream color', while @shaun-tru6 states, 'I love Aga Blue!' @coinman reminisces about owning a similar model with the same factory color, showing enthusiasm for the vintage aspect. The seller, @bahamonf, reassures that the car presents well and performs without any apparent issues, emphasizing its solid build and absence of rust, which many find appealing.
Neutral: There are various inquiries about the car's condition, specifically regarding maintenance records, paint quality, and any previous repairs. Commenters like @yorgos7 and @XabBlue request detailed history and clarity on visible imperfections in the paint. @bahamonf, the seller, clarifies the car's status, admitting some close-up paint issues but maintaining that the car is structurally sound and without oil leaks. The seller is open to supplying additional photos and even encourages a pre-purchase inspection for serious buyers to assess the vehicle thoroughly.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the paint job and potential hidden issues, notably by @tyracious, who questions the repeated claims of the car being rust-free. @jcdk adds that bubbles under the paint could result from trapped moisture, highlighting past repairs. The hood alignment is also scrutinized by multiple users, including @autophyle, who notes it appears bent, causing potential doubts about previous bodywork quality. The skepticism surrounding the car's overall condition and lack of detailed history makes some potential buyers hesitant.
|
 |
Positive: @odnt1 expressed a strong affection for the truck, calling it beautiful and sharing their personal admiration as they own a similar model. @Smithabq highlighted the presentation of the truck, stating it was one of the finest they have seen in their experience on BaT. The seller, @Guardian_Auto, consistently communicated reassurances about the truck's condition, addressing concerns promptly and maintaining transparency about the vehicle's features and history. He also provided additional resources, including links to videos, to showcase its condition and functionality.
Neutral: @BruceBraman asked for clarifications regarding the operation of various electronic systems and the condition of specific areas of the truck, demonstrating a proactive approach to ensuring all aspects of the vehicle are thoroughly inspected before bidding. The seller acknowledged these requests and committed to providing further details, including videos and additional pictures to assure potential buyers of the truck's condition. @ManualsOnly inquired about the vehicle's accident history, and @Guardian_Auto explained the situation without any signs of damage, indicating the lack of clarity on the reported accident.
Negative: There were some minor concerns raised about the condition of the vehicle, such as the surface corrosion on the frame, which was deemed typical for northern state vehicles but still warranted a closer look by potential buyers. @BruceBraman noted the presence of rust and asked for specific photographic evidence of key areas, while @TinnerDan sought clarification on the truck's classification, which indicated some confusion about its specifications. Additionally, @Smithabq expressed initial frustration due to a delayed response regarding the title and sales tax process, reflecting some uncertainty in communication.
|
 |
Positive: @Scott68GTO remarked on the vehicle's beauty, identifying it as "gorgeous," while @SRHogie echoed a similar sentiment with "She’s beautiful! GLWTA." Many commenters admired the car's striking aesthetics, with @Dollycat3 describing it as "Absolutely stunning and stylish" and @PWSchuh quipping about its already impressive factory features, saying, "When your ride is so pimped from the factory that it cannot be further pimped." Others, like @BrgBerns, highlighted its classic appeal by referring to it as the "epitome of longer, lower, wider and beautiful." The responses reflect a strong appreciation for the car's style and classic GM design.
Neutral: @ClassicPromenade (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car, including a welcome note to the community and insight into the features and condition that the car is in, acknowledging some cosmetic work is needed. @SteveStunning asked about inspection opportunities, while @JohnKab inquired about the carburetors and air suspension. Multiple comments suggested that while the car needs some work, it still offers valuable features and reflects the optimism of its era. The Seller emphasized their commitment to providing answers and encouraging questions from potential bidders.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's mechanical condition were raised, particularly by @zman, who mentioned a "blown tranny" and highlighted known issues with the vehicle's transmission in previous models. @ericdev noted that the paint appears different under various lighting, leading to uncertainty about its true color. Additionally, @JIMSCAT suggested that information about the functionality of the carburetors needed clarity, indicating the complexity of the car's modifications. This collection of comments showcases a recognition of the vehicle's charm juxtaposed with a cautionary stance on its state.
|
 |
Positive: @ehrenbragg praised the seller, describing him as honest, transparent, and hard-working, encouraging potential buyers to purchase with confidence. @yilmaz304 (The Seller) responded with gratitude for the kind words and commitment to upload requested content. The vehicle is highlighted for its attractive color combination, and it is mentioned that it has only 10k miles and comes with two keys and the original build sheet worth $233,995, which assures buyers of its premium value.
Neutral: Several buyers, including @PaulBentley and @Red99, inquired about various aspects of the vehicle, such as the cold start video, maintenance history, and the condition of specific parts like the driver seat and front lip. @yilmaz304 (The Seller) provided answers regarding service records, confirming the availability of documentation but noting limitations on the history beyond those records. The seller also communicated that any minor imperfections noted were standard for a vehicle of this age and mileage, suggesting transparency in dealings.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commenters like @Red99 regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly questioning if there were any nicks, scratches, or maintenance issues beyond the provided service records from 2022. @mercjrl1 highlighted potential high replacement costs for parts related to the vehicle's condition. @yilmaz304 (The Seller) addressed some concerns about cosmetic issues, revealing a minor lamination issue on the driver-side door glass that does not affect functionality, while assuring that there are no known mechanical issues despite some worries regarding the vehicle's history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments for its aesthetic appeal and performance. @wpaenthusiast reminisced about a similar canary yellow model he drove in high school, calling the current car a gem, while @Tom_S. praised its profile view, declaring it the best among Mopar products. Other enthusiasts like @Frankthetank67 and @ButWhatDoIKnow highlighted details like the car's original color and performance, with the latter emphasizing the 440 engine's superiority for street driving and drag racing.
Neutral: Comments seeking additional information or clarification about the vehicle included inquiries about specific features and components. For instance, @pmafterdark was curious about a knob on the dashboard, while @Valiantjim pointed out the absence of a critical anti-roll bar in the suspension setup. The seller, @classiccornergarage, has actively responded to these queries, providing insights about the car's original features and current state, showing a keen engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's condition and completeness were raised among commenters. @neilpierson25 bluntly suggested that individuals looking for a sleeper should keep searching, implying that this car may not meet that criterion. Additionally, @Valiantjim commented on the lack of an anti-roll bar, expressing skepticism about the performance aspects without it, which leads to doubts regarding the vehicle's readiness for R/T performance standards.
|
 |
Positive: Comments praising the vehicle highlight its beauty and rarity. @Singerirv compliments the beautiful exterior color, while @diligaf admires its unmolested condition and ultra-rare color combination. @70_duster describes it as one of the most beautiful cars of all time, reinforcing the car's aesthetic appeal. @Jdstell and @jimmytheirishman also express admiration by calling it absolutely beautiful and a beauty, respectively. @fiminod (The Seller) further supports this sentiment by acknowledging the positive feedback and sharing the car's California roots, while @P0rsche956 reminisces about the car's significance during their university days.
Neutral: Some comments provide necessary information and inquiries about the vehicle's condition. @LegalBill asks for deeper history regarding the mileage and any potential engine rebuilds, seeking clarity on the vehicle's originality. @compcar98 raises concerns about the rear suspension setup, noting the ride height and camber issues without negating the car's overall attractiveness. Additionally, @jetman agrees with @compcar98's observation and suggests that these issues are fixable before the auction ends. @davidxk offers statistics on the car's color combination, indicating it was more common than suggested, yet appreciates the unique option that @fiminod (The Seller) has presented.
Negative: Negative comments focus on the car's mechanical issues and potential misrepresentation. @compcar98 identifies that the vehicle has an incorrect setup with the rear ride height and camber, indicating it requires further mechanical work. @dav idxk expresses skepticism about the rarity of the color combination, pointing out that it is actually one of the more popular options for the model, and raises concerns about the visible stance of the car. This indicates a potential undercurrent of doubt regarding the car's condition and its description in the listing, which may affect prospective buyers' perceptions.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the impressive condition and low mileage of the car being sold. @Sevagmtr (The Seller) emphasizes that the vehicle is almost like new, praising its exceptional interior and exterior condition as well as detailing thorough maintenance records. Several users, including @Hubie7, express admiration for the car, calling it a beautiful example of an M Roadster and suggesting it would make a great summer driver. The seller also responds positively to inquiries, affirming the absence of common issues often found in similar vehicles.
Neutral: Some community members ask for clarification on specific maintenance aspects, such as the history of electrical issues from the early 2000s (@Taz66) and the presence of records for coolant flushing (@Taz66). Questions are raised about the car's visibility for in-person viewing (@WestRiverCrew), and there are requests for video content demonstrating the convertible top operation and A/C performance (@jspirate). The seller engages with potential buyers by assuring them that the requested videos and service records are forthcoming and that they can view the car in person.
Negative: A few concerns are raised about the potential issues of the car, specifically @2002dave's mention of the IMS bearing, which implies that while the car is in good condition, there may still be underlying aspects to monitor. @jspirate points out worries regarding A/C temperature readings that seem high, suggesting the need for further assessment. There is also a mild concern regarding the absence of the BMW logo’d blanket that typically protects the rear glass when the roof is lowered, as noted by @Shadowfaxss.
|
 |
Positive: @ntbd4 commented on the regular servicing of the truck, noting that the Banks upgrades installed will ensure it runs efficiently for a long time. @p1_motorcars_ltd emphasized that this well-maintained California truck is equipped with various features that allow it to tow effectively and travel comfortably. They highlighted the proper maintenance and enhancements that ensure the truck is ready for immediate use, stating that with its added Banks upgrades and the FAAS fuel filter relocation kit, it requires nothing before hitting the road.
Neutral: @p1_motorcars_ltd introduced the vehicle as a clean, well-maintained truck boasting numerous features, appealing for both capability and aesthetics. They have provided helpful content, including cold start and driving videos, which showcase the truck's performance. The seller also shared information about their extensive experience as a dealership and their commitment to customer service with a transparent process for shipping across the USA and Canada.
Negative: While there were no overtly negative comments regarding the truck itself, @Elmer_T inquired specifically about the type of transmission in the vehicle, wanting to clarify whether it has the Aisin or 68RFE transmission. The resolution of this query may indicate that potential buyers are cautious and want to ensure the suitability of the truck for their needs.
|
 |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy appreciates the specific specs of the car, highlighting it as a beautiful E90 330xi with a 6 Speed Manual. @cj11 points out the well-maintained condition of the vehicle, noting its cleanliness and desirable features like xenons and comfort access. @aSingh39 (The Seller) emphasizes that the car has been well-maintained, addressing concerns about previous ownership and confirming that the car came in good condition requiring only minimal restoration work.
Neutral: @aSingh39 (The Seller) welcomes everyone to the auction, encouraging questions and interactions. Several users, including @ppayne3, inquire about the car's history and condition, asking specifically about oil leaks and maintenance records. @ManualOverride asks about the tire DOT date codes, while @Tpetty seeks information on the cost for common maintenance issues, indicating a general interest in the car's reliability and upkeep.
Negative: @RobE36 expresses concern regarding the car's battery history, suggesting potential issues with parasitic drains or improper storage. He shares experiences with elderly-owned vehicles that might have been neglected in terms of maintenance. @Cykls and @RobE36 echo this sentiment, questioning whether the battery issues have been resolved and voicing skepticism about minimal use in the past decade.
|
Original-Owner 2,700-Mile 2013 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 6-Speed
2G1FZ1EP2D9802338
Lot 237708
Private Party
 |
Positive: @LunaBrew2026 (The Seller) confirms that the grey stripe on the roof and trunk is a factory sticker, providing clarity about the vehicle's features. Additionally, comments from @DDTDDT offer transparent information about shipping costs, indicating that buyers can find shipping costs at the bottom of the listing. These interactions indicate an engaged seller who is willing to answer potential buyers' inquiries regarding important aspects like shipping and vehicle details.
Neutral: Several potential buyers are inquiring about various logistical aspects of the purchase. @1969Camaroman asks about shipping costs to Phoenix, and @strubes250 expresses difficulty in obtaining shipping quotes for locations beyond 48 states. There is also interest in seeing videos of the vehicle running, with @AB2112 requesting a cold start and driving perspective, indicating a desire for more engaging content to aid in decision-making.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the accuracy of the vehicle's features, particularly regarding the mention of Recaro seats. @Al_Loco points out the discrepancy, indicating that the car has base ZL1 seats instead, while @bringatrailer acknowledges this oversight and states that they have updated the listing to remove references to the Recaro seats. Such discrepancies can contribute to buyer skepticism and affect the overall perception of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a level of appreciation for the car's aesthetic appeal, particularly noting the beautiful blue color. @MR2Wheels expresses admiration by describing the car as beautiful, while @911930996GT2 acknowledges the color positively and hints at interest, indicating that it’s an attractive vehicle. Additionally, @CAPITAL1 (The Seller) highlights their personal connection with the car, stating that they love it and have used it only on nice days, which shows a sense of pride in ownership.
Neutral: Some comments focus on inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and condition, demonstrating potential buyers' interest in its upkeep. @911930996GT2 specifically asks about the IMS upgrade, leak down test, and oil usage, pointing to a desire for transparency about the car's performance and care. @CAPITAL1 (The Seller) responds to these queries with details about the absence of certain tests, reinforcing an open communication approach. The seller also addresses potential buyers by welcoming questions and providing updates about the car's maintenance.
Negative: Concerns about the car's history and current condition are raised, particularly by @911930996GT2, who questions the lack of an IMS upgrade and requests more information about previous maintenance checks like the leak down test and oil analysis. @backdra988 mentions the old tires from 2017, which could indicate a lack of recent maintenance or concern about the car's overall reliability. Additionally, @kakinuma seeks clarification about the separation noted on the dash upholstery, suggesting some issues with the interior that could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @ColeHedden provided informative responses, indicating that the transmission was replaced before he purchased the vehicle, and he has experienced no issues with it over the last 40,000 miles. Additionally, he clarified the circumstances regarding the mileage discrepancy noted in the Carfax report, confirming that it was due to an error during service entry rather than an issue with the vehicle itself. @Onlyfour confirmed the current mileage of 80,659 is corrected in their system, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's maintenance history.
Neutral: @BarryB1 and @AlexDJ both inquired about specific replacement items and the circumstances surrounding the transmission and clutch replacement, indicating a desire for clarity about the vehicle's service history. @PhilA254 asked for details about the shop that handled the transmission replacement and whether documentation is available, highlighting the importance of transparency in such transactions. @chuckgoolsbee shared insights about common issues with the model, like the convertible top motor's vulnerability and the vanos system's maintenance requirements, which provide useful context for prospective buyers.
Negative: @dps313 expressed concerns about whether the vanos or rod bearings had been addressed, highlighting a potential area of worry for buyers considering long-term reliability. @justpaul’s comment seemed dismissive, using slang that may suggest skepticism about the seller's responses. Overall, the discussion reflects some apprehension surrounding the vehicle's maintenance needs and history, emphasizing the necessity for potential buyers to gather comprehensive information.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's construction and aesthetic appeal, particularly noting @boaboyoz's remark about the truck's 'Marlboro Maroon magnificence.' @Y2KRides confirmed that significant investment was made on important aspects of the restoration, emphasizing the builder's 20-year history of quality work, which has resulted in a well-executed final product that stands out. Overall, the design, particularly the color choice, was highly regarded and acknowledged by several participants in the discussion.
Neutral: Some participants sought clarification on technical aspects regarding the vehicle. @standurst requested additional images to assess the exhaust placement, while @C10HQ asked about the frame's modifications and the current status of the bed box. @ReedBooth inquired about the presence of necessary ground straps and structural modifications made to the frame. These questions indicated a level of interest in the vehicle's functionality and how it adheres to safety expectations during driving.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding specific features of the truck. @dougJ75 and @BlackDiamondDave noted that the exhaust extension is not solely due to long tube headers but rather for facilitating easy installation of the cross pipe, bringing into question the restoration choices made in the truck's design. Additionally, @hwavey criticized the seating placement, finding it potentially unsuitable for shorter drivers, and @beau81 pointed out cosmetic flaws in the interior paint, suggesting the original dashboard’s condition might detract from the truck's overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 highlighted the vehicle's stunning aesthetics, noting its one-family ownership and original California charm, along with features such as the sunroof and extensive documentation. @MichaelKirschmann referred to it as a 'Jackpot Unicorn' due to its unusual colors and generally good condition, prompting inquiries about its drivability and AC functionality. Additionally, @69_911e appreciated the car's original blue plates, suggesting its historical value and significance in the W108 production line, promoting goodwill towards the sale.
Neutral: Several commenters expressed a mix of nostalgia and skepticism. @carelallen reminisced about their own 108 4.5 while questioning the unknown total mileage, suggesting a potential odometer issue. Meanwhile, @igorgo described a love-hate relationship with these classic vehicles, acknowledging their affordability yet cautioning about condition and restoration costs. The seller, @MohrImports (The Seller), actively engaged with the audience, sharing ownership history and explaining the unknown mileage due to potential odometer inconsistencies, reflecting transparency in communication.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's condition arose from various commenters. @donkeybackpunch remarked on the quality of the paintwork, suggesting it may have been poorly redone. They also raised doubts about the rust on the fenders and inquired about the vehicle's undercarriage condition. Furthermore, @mrb43 pointed out discrepancies, noting mismatched hubcap centers and roof colors, which may indicate a lack of attention to detail in the car’s restoration or maintenance history. @CCDIII pressed for answers regarding the operational status of the car's A/C and heat, alongside inquiries about oil leaks and the seriousness of any rust issues, emphasizing the need for clarity on potential repair costs.
|
1960 Ford Thunderbird Convertible for Fisher Center for Alzheimer’s Research Foundation
0Y73Y155174
Lot 237744
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, noting its beauty and the nostalgic memories it evokes. @MuffyBennett shares a heartfelt sentiment about raising money for a worthy cause, reflecting on a personal loss. @Kirb praises the car’s aesthetics and driving experience, highlighting that nothing rides like a '60 Thunderbird. Commenters like @Dollycat3 and @Noisyboyz also celebrate the car’s design, with @Noisyboyz reminiscing about their own adventurous past with a similar model. Overall, the comments radiate positivity and appreciation for the car's heritage and charm.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the nostalgia associated with the Thunderbird without strong emotional emphasis. @Dollycat3 enjoys seeing cars from her birth year while @VanSman connects his childhood memory of a similar vehicle to significant moments in his life. @RoyHartfield recounts his first car experience but notes uncertainty about staying in the bidding, maintaining a practical perspective. Other commenters, like @midengineracer and @bringatrailer, make light-hearted observations about the car's categorization and functionality. These comments indicate a mixture of fondness and casual interest without delving into deeper emotional connections.
Negative: A few comments hint at the challenges or concerns surrounding the vehicle. @BigD36ford questions what maintenance the car might require, indicating a wary approach to its condition, while @theforce88 offers a simple good luck, suggesting some detached optimism. @Marty752 (The Seller) assures that the car is well-maintained, but the underlying concern about potential issues is evident in users' curiosities about its mechanical state. Overall, while excitement for the Thunderbird is prevalent, there are cautious inquiries reflecting uncertainty about its condition and value.
|
 |
Positive: @Jbrown89 expresses love for the truck, describing it as a "crusty rusty bullnose diesel" that draws a connection to enthusiasts who appreciate its rugged charm. @88csanderson shares a nostalgic connection to the vehicle, recalling how the original owner used it for practical purposes on a ranch, while @KZN185Surf emphasizes its practicality, describing it as the ideal workhorse for "truck things." The seller, @NorthernNate, mentions the truck's transformative journey back to life after a decade of inactivity, showcasing a commitment to preserving its original character despite its imperfections.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a sense of curiosity and interest in the truck's specifications and performance, notably from @ddettamanti, who inquires about the handling at highway speeds and any potential issues. @YennaM requests to hear sounds of the engine and exhaust when possible. @NorthernNate assures that the truck handles well at highway speeds and successfully completed a 400-mile trip without issues, suggesting reliability. He provides details about the recent work done on the vehicle, including a thorough itemized list of repairs and upgrades, which seems to reassure interested buyers about the truck's condition.
Negative: A few concerns are raised regarding the truck's functionality and reliability. @ddettamanti's question about highway handling implies a need for potential buyers to be cautious about long-distance travel. Additionally, @88csanderson asks about the fuel system's functionality, particularly the operation of the fuel tank selector and indicators, hinting at common issues with bullnose Fords. Although @NorthernNate addresses these concerns by detailing the fuel system upgrades, the inquiries reflect an awareness of the vehicle's age and necessary maintenance, which could deter some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @racelance describes the vehicle as the best driving BMW and expresses joy for every mile driven, suggesting it's a gem that others will love as well. @Fairmont663336 excitedly comments on the low mileage, indicating the car is valuable and can soar in popularity. @Vwrabbitgti shares a positive experience with a similar car, referring to it as an 'angry little car' which signifies its sporty character. Additionally, @AUDIologist believes the 1M has a special feel compared to other models, emphasizing its fantastic looks and driving sharpness, while @70_duster expresses a preference for this model over newer M cars, further reinforcing its desirability.
Neutral: @Shanejanssen (The Seller) responds to @snakoo about adding sound clips of the exhaust soon, keeping potential buyers engaged. @Revmatch21 notes that while the car is a great choice, its mileage is a concern for them, balancing their admiration for the car with practicality. @GruppeC956 praises the 1M for its mix of classic BMW characteristics and performance, while @Delia_Wolfe discusses the car's styling cues and driving experience in comparison to the 135i, highlighting both the allure and the price comparison as complex aspects of the purchasing decision. @kashikoi and @Delia_Wolfe engage in a discussion regarding modifying cars versus keeping the original, showing different perspectives on car ownership.
Negative: @illirep questions the seller's short-term ownership of the vehicle and minimal use, which could imply concerns about the car's condition or value retention. This comment raises an eyebrow about the seller's motivations, leading to skepticism among potential buyers. While most comments are positive or neutral, this slight negativity reflects some buyer hesitation in light of the seller's brief tenure with the car.
|
 |
Positive: The truck has received positive comments for its well-presented condition and appealing aesthetics, with @cantfinditgrindit noting it looks 'mean out here on these Carlsbad streets!' and @UncleBaldy calling it a 'very nicely done ride.' The seller, @CompassRacing, is proactive in engaging the community by providing cold start and driving videos, which many have appreciated. Additionally, @Bmarcum highlighted the truck's excellent suspension and powerful built 347 engine, claiming it adds significant value to the overall package.
Neutral: Some comments posed questions about the truck, with @WIZZZZ inquiring about the gap between the cab and bed, which was met with an attempt at clarity from the seller. @Bobby21 asked about potential issues that could affect long-distance driving, to which @CompassRacing assured that they had successfully driven the truck for about 40 miles. This back-and-forth indicates an openness to discussion and a willingness to address buyer concerns, showcasing a community-oriented auction environment.
Negative: Conversely, there were critical remarks regarding the truck's condition, such as @Eric1978’s assessment that the body appears rough and the VIN is questionable. Such comments underline a cautionary note for prospective bidders, suggesting the possibility of hidden issues despite the truck's otherwise positive perceptions. This mixed feedback demonstrates that while many see the allure of the vehicle, there's a significant part of the audience weighing potential concerns.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors expressed excitement and admiration for the unique Mercedes-Benz 300 SL-style jet boat. @LukAutoGroup described it as an absolute blast to ride, highlighting its impressive build and performance. Users like @boaboyoz and @stugottz found it to be a fantastic addition to a collector's repertoire, while others like @Hulk2000 appreciated its fun and quirky design, suggesting modifications like spinner wheels. The boat's appeal is further enhanced by its capability to attract attention on the water, with @LukAutoGroup providing a video showcasing its thrilling performance.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding the boat's specifications and history, reflecting a need for more information before potential buyers commit. @boyleed inquired about registration and previous water usage, while @VOGE asked about the water type during its usage. @LukAutoGroup provided clarifications, confirming that the boat is registered in Florida and has been used in saltwater. Commentors like @Nadster sought assistance with transport options, indicating practical concerns prospective buyers might have before acquiring the vehicle.
Negative: Despite the overwhelmingly positive comments, some criticisms arose regarding the boat's uniqueness, with @bondgraham describing it as 'weird.' @Ryandad found the vessel to be outside their norm, expressing speechlessness. There was also skepticism regarding the boat's practical usage from @Rkenneth who simply asked if it floats, suggesting that some audience members might view it as more of a novelty than a functional watercraft.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters overwhelmingly praise the 1969 Alfa Romeo Spider Veloce, highlighting its beauty and pristine condition. @High_Hope admires the vehicle's originality and predicts a bright future for its potential auction success. @dchunk911 and @GeorgeLyons express excitement about the car's features, and @lbdave appreciates the absence of aftermarket modifications, reflecting on the authentic experience this Alfa offers. Notably, @SirMichael57 views this specific model as one of the best he has seen recently, further underscoring the positive sentiment around its allure and craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around the vehicle's details and minor imperfections. While most critics acknowledge the car's overall quality, they mention specific concerns such as the second and third gear synchro, as pointed out by @MGRMLN. @OssoBene comments on the exhaust and convertible top's appearance, offering constructive feedback rather than outright criticism. Discussions also touch on the restoration and originality aspects. @GeorgeLyons tries to clarify points about the car's history, including details on its past ownership and repairs, striving to address concerns while maintaining the car's appeal in the auction.
Negative: Some commenters point out defects in the vehicle that could affect its auction quality. @SirMichael57 raises issues about door fit and non-factory welds, which he believes detract from its overall condition. Concerns about the hood prop rod bracket and its workmanship have also been highlighted, with @SPRofFL and others emphasizing that these issues may impact bidding expectations. The community is split between valuing authenticity while grappling with the car's acknowledged repairs, as remarked by @etip, who notes the potential for miscommunication regarding the vehicle's exact state and specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @Vic (The Seller) describes the vehicle positively, highlighting that it runs and drives really nice, has beautiful paint, and is overall a very beautiful car. @Stropp expresses nostalgia for the 60s and a love for cars like this, indicating an appreciation for the aesthetic and historical value of the vehicle. The seller also emphasizes that the car is numbers matching, which adds to its desirability among collectors.
Neutral: @zeres raises inquiries regarding the floor pan and whether the holes are indications of damage or repairs while also noting that the car looks nice. @OldVelasco asks for information about rust, whether a Carfax report is available, and remarks on the condition of the dash pad, seeking clarification without making a judgment on the vehicle's quality.
Negative: @zeres's questions about holes in the floor pan and the absence of a tow hook suggest concerns about the car's condition, which could be perceived as a negative viewpoint. @OldVelasco's inquiries regarding rust and the condition of the dash pad also imply skepticism about the vehicle's overall integrity, which might indicate potential issues not initially disclosed.
|
2,800-Mile 1997 Harley-Davidson Heritage Springer Softail
1HD1BRL14VY030052
Lot 237727
Private Party
 |
Positive: @T1934 praised the vehicle's performance, especially noting that the cold start was very good for a stock carb, a sentiment echoed by @EJC2026, who offered to provide a cold start video for further assurance. Commenters like @JoeT and @JAY-Z appreciated the aesthetic appeal of the bike, with @JoeT calling it the best-looking Harley in modern history, while @JAY-Z highlighted its classic design features, expressing admiration for the Heritage Springer's timeless beauty and unique riding experience. Another comment, from @RickonaDeuce, commended the bike's classiness, further emphasizing its positive reception within the community.
Neutral: @EJC2026 (The Seller) shared relevant background information about the bike's ownership, revealing it has been in the family for nearly three decades and detailing the lack of major mechanical issues, aside from routine maintenance like carburetor and tire replacements. Other users engaged in discussions about the color of the bike, clarifying the existence of different color options, and asking questions about potential engine work, especially related to known issues with particular models from that era, contributing to a balanced discussion about the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @3alarm regarding the engine reliability of the 1997 and 1998 softtails, referencing past issues with cam bearings that affected friends' similar bikes, underscoring anxieties about mechanical integrity. Additionally, @T1934 inquired about the date code on the tires, implying a concern over their condition, while @EJC2026 agreed that the old tires felt hard and needed replacing due to age, indicating a potentially negative aspect regarding maintenance and the bike's readiness for use.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle's overall condition and aesthetic appeal. @Siowner2 notes that it is in great condition and well taken care of, mentioning the good colors and nice interior. @JustaGlitch highlights the attractive color combination, particularly favoring how it looks with the hard-top. Overall, the vehicle is seen as a well-maintained and original example, which is a significant positive in the car community.
Neutral: @tventas (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle's maintenance history and transparency concerning its condition. He confirms that the mileage is accurate, supported by service records and Carfax reports. The seller also explains that the tires are relatively new, all fluids and filters have been replaced, and the car is mechanically ready to drive. He mentions available documentation and includes a walkaround video to display the vehicle's condition more effectively.
Negative: A few concerns are raised in the comments, particularly regarding functionality. @fgiachbenz inquires about the air conditioning, radio, and clock, indicating potential buyer apprehension about these features. @jeffs3820 asks specifically about the availability of the original Becker radio, showing interest in the vehicle’s original components. Although the seller addresses the questions, the issues raised about the clock and radio may detract from the vehicle's appeal to some prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg finds the vehicle absolutely epic, suggesting excitement and keen interest. @T4R expresses disbelief at the truck's condition, while @97Stang believes it will attract serious bids. @CarDogThreePedals shares gratitude for previous owners who preserved such vehicles, emphasizing their rarity and nostalgia. @minidude admires the truck's stunning visual appeal and condition, noting its historic value as a work truck. @2caddiesandaMach1 appreciates the cleanliness of the underside, echoing sentiments regarding preservation. @WDBGR states that the little imperfections add to its overall charm, and @Mmirto66 (The Seller) presents an enthusiastic and detailed account of the truck's history, emphasizing its untouched, pristine condition.
Neutral: @INDPNDT raises concerns about the quality of the engine bay and undercarriage paint, while @angushopper suggests the paint degradation is likely due to its age. @Jts7210 critiques the evidence of wear on the pedals and interior, and @WonderlandCanyon questions the rationale for preserving a regular F150 as a collectible. The selling point regarding the truck's '146 miles' is met with skepticism by multiple commenters, including @CarDogThreePedals, who suggests it may have seen more mileage than stated. @Pitcrw6 acknowledges the truck's beauty while speculating on its auction prospect. @FKurick requests additional documentation about the vehicle's history for added confidence in its authenticity.
Negative: Several commenters express skepticism about the truck's claimed mileage, including @Jts7210 who mockingly asks if the 146 miles could have all been on a salted road. @INDPNDT points out inconsistencies in the truck's condition and maintenance, while @WonderlandCanyon highlights doubts about the seller's narrative regarding the preservation of the vehicle. @Mmirto66 (The Seller)'s explanations about the red oxide primer and other imperfections face scrutiny from users like @carstruck who suggest that hidden repairs may have been made. @velocipede voices a concern over the appearance of new paint on the water pump, casting further doubt on the truck’s described authenticity. @RWD-FTW finds it odd that someone would preserve such a basic truck, questioning why anyone would consider it valuable enough to keep pristine, further amplifying concern regarding its alleged history.
|
 |
Positive: @LoveaProject has invested significant time and effort into restoring this 1969 Camaro SS clone, ensuring it looks fantastic and runs smoothly. The mechanical upgrades, while maintaining an original appearance, make it enjoyable to drive. @TommieOG and @boaboyoz both expressed admiration for the car's aesthetic and build quality, while others like @ssterry appreciated the tasteful modifications, highlighting the overall positive reception from the community.
Neutral: Comments from @Kumiteken and @565FatRat reflect some reservations about specific features of the car, such as the choice of transmission and exhaust, suggesting improvements could be made. @MaseratiDave posed thoughtful questions regarding the car's paint history and potential rust issues. @loveaproject responded to these queries with transparency, confirming the car's prior restoration and maintenance, contributing to a balanced view of the vehicle.
Negative: However, there are hints of criticism in some comments. @565FatRat pointed out the need for better exhaust alignment, suggesting that the work done was not entirely up to par. Additionally, @charlesw2501 raised concerns about the subframe's condition and paint, indicating possible oversight in the car's restoration process. These negative comments point to areas where potential buyers might seek further assurance regarding the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters noted the vehicle's strong performance and appealing characteristics. @BlackhorseLA expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, suggesting that despite the current trends in newer 4x4 models, classics like this will appreciate in value. @LutherP8432, the seller, reassured potential buyers that the truck runs strong and has been mechanically solid during their ownership, indicating confidence in its reliability.
Neutral: Several participants brought attention to the discrepancies in mileage reported on the Carfax compared to the odometer reading. @LutherP8432 explained the situation behind the conflicting information about mileage, acknowledging the challenges due to the vehicle's age and the lack of supportive documentation. @bringatrailer addressed the community, appreciating the raised concerns about the Carfax report and recognizing the possibility of clerical errors in such records.
Negative: However, there was significant concern regarding the mileage inconsistencies, which some commenters like @Mownhoj argued could affect the vehicle's value and questioned the lack of transparency in the listing. @Bosco53 also highlighted doubts about the seller's credibility while @calsbeek and others pointed out potential issues such as signs of overheating visible in the photos. This has led to skepticism around the overall honesty of the sale, drawing attention to the importance of accurate vehicle representation.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's rarity and condition, highlighting its status as a 'VW unicorn' due to the limited number of six-speed manual versions available in the US. @MajorTomB remarked on the scarcity of such models, while @MJC2 praised the vehicle as a gem due to its low mileage and pristine state. @GarageSurfer and @Chicanery also complemented the car's beautiful color scheme and overall quality, suggesting that it reflects the high standards of a well-preserved collector's item. The seller, @Youngtimerclassics, shared detailed insights about the vehicle's maintenance and care, emphasizing its original condition and minimal wear, which is a major selling point for potential buyers.
Neutral: There were several inquiries and comments regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and specific components that often require attention in W8 models. @Jive and @COhm asked about critical maintenance tasks such as changing the balance shaft belt and the condition of the tires and oil. These questions seemed directed toward assessing the vehicle's reliability given its age. @Youngtimerclassics responded, reassuring potential buyers that the vehicle has been meticulously maintained and that major concerns typically associated with higher mileage models do not apply in this case, as the car has only 28k original miles.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about unresolved maintenance tasks and potential risks associated with age-related degradation of components. @Jive insisted that age should warrant replacement of certain items, regardless of mileage, while @GSAudio noted previous issues they faced with these vehicles. The seller, @Youngtimerclassics, acknowledged these concerns but maintained that the vehicle's excellent preservation meant there were no immediate issues that necessitated disassembly or proactive replacements, arguing that the condition overrides general preventative measures that might apply to more heavily used cars.
|
 |
Positive: @ekmcmullen describes the vehicle as a fabulous, wonderful, elegant, and lovely relic, embodying what cars should be. @70_duster compliments the car's beauty, wishing the seller good luck with the transaction. @SteveMack_CT appreciates the long hoodline and three-window coupe design, highlighting its great appearance. @Middler89 echoes this sentiment by praising the great design and the long, low stance compared to others from its time period.
Neutral: @pianomanbob inquires about the starter replacement, requesting a photo of the new starter and also asking for a photo of the water pump to check for leaks. @Gulfbreezesean, the seller, clarifies that the starter and generator are original but have been overhauled. He notes that the water pump has new packing on the shaft ends to prevent leaks after snugging the packing post-startup. @erzmo raises a technical question regarding the engine type, while @onlyoriginalcars asks about the car's comfortable driving speed, acknowledging that it can vary between 40 to 60 mph depending on various factors.
Negative:
|
|
|