Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its aesthetics and craftsmanship, with @rmcavay appreciating the no reserve auction setup for a beautiful Bronco. @boaboyoz admires the lovely light jade over white color combination, praising the legendary seller and the build quality. @Todd_Z notes the retention of the stock eyebrow grille and original rear end housing as a plus, and @joeboy1966 agrees on the beautiful color combo, expressing good luck wishes to the seller. @MontanaBroncos complements the sharp build and photo quality, indicating the vehicle is built to drive.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provides detailed listings and transparency about the car, addressing questions from potential buyers. @JDB1 asks about the interpretation of meter reading spreads, while @Molae65 and @Itsameromi seek clarification on the restoration's specifics and frame type, with @1600veloce confirming it is an original frame and not a new tub. The seller assures bidders that the vehicle runs well after $10k in service work, while also explaining the reasoning behind features like the body lift for tire clearance, as mentioned by @Stevebower.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the vehicle's build details. @LateToLearn voices concern over repair lists, which gives pause regarding the vehicle's overall integrity. There are also inquiries about the original build documentation and who did the work, which @Itsameromi suggests could influence buyer confidence. Additionally, @JoelNeedsMoreParking raises concerns about the air conditioning's effectiveness in hot weather, questioning the system's capability, which may hint at potential discomfort for future use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its rarity and stunning aesthetics. @boaboyoz labeled the 993 Cup 3.8 RSR as sensational and 'drop dead gorgeous,' expressing a strong desire for the vehicle. @Fatalvenom mentioned the additions like air conditioning and carpeting enhanced its appeal, despite questioning the vehicle's road legality. Commenters like @fatalvenom and @Haikuman have shared personal success stories of registering similar cars for road use, showcasing the potential enjoyment this car can bring when properly utilized.
Neutral: Several comments center around the vehicle's legal status for road use. @jfcowell believes there are ways to title this car for street use outside of California, while @micro912 questions its street legality given the lack of a title. @Haikuman shares experiences related to road registration and modifications indicating it might be more attainable than initially thought. Users also discuss the car's suitability for track use, with comments suggesting the vehicle could be ideal for racing on the right roads.
Negative: A few negative remarks point out concerns over the modifications made to the vehicle. @hyperion917 wished for clearer communication about the permanent nature of the roll cage modifications and whether side impact bars could be re-fitted. @Fatalvenom criticized the logic behind the car's comfort-oriented features if it cannot be legally driven on the road, indicating confusion over its intended use. Doubts about the practicality of making this car street-legal persist among some users, complicating its desirability in the market.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1957 Porsche 356A Speedster, highlighting its stunning aesthetics and desirability. @Dollycat3 describes the car as 'absolutely stunning' and praises its color combination and interior. @manpot finds it to be the perfect Speedster, while @autohandler and @spg356 comment on its beautiful restoration and overall allure. @Karmann appreciates the decision to auction with no reserve and believes the car's timeless beauty will continue to captivate new generations. Overall, the consensus is that the 356A Speedster is a legendary vehicle that enthusiasts deeply appreciate.
Neutral: Some comments reflect on technical details and inquire about the restoration process. @Prewar_Roadster asks for specifics regarding body panels and engine rebuilds, while @zeres notes the car’s restoration quality and expresses curiosity about its history. Others, like @bobofohio, point out discrepancies with the car's original color as per the Kardex, suggesting it was originally red and black, though many support the current color scheme. The conversation around the vehicle covers both aesthetic appreciation and necessary verification of details, indicating active engagement among commenters.
Negative: There are also some critical comments regarding the lack of clear responses from the seller on specific questions about the car's condition. @Prewar_Roadster mentions unanswered inquiries about the restoration details and documentation, which raises concerns for potential buyers. @OldVelasco expresses frustrations about unanswered questions regarding the electrical system and brake types. Additionally, comments from @spg356 suggest that the seller could improve communication to adequately address concerns regarding authenticity and documentation, casting a shadow on the overall transparency of the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as absolutely superb, while @johnnyb11 appreciated the slick paint evident in the side profile photos. @Jusaur highlighted the compelling spec of the car, noting the unique ChromaFlair paint that changes with light and the clean, cohesive interior design despite its multiple options. @MikeFiftyNine and @DkHorse praised the video explaining the features of the car, calling it stunning and well-spec'd. @boaboyoz referred to the vehicle as a 'sensational specimen,' and @WilliamBoldson expressed his enthusiasm for seeing an SF90 with a remarkable spec, sharing his own positive experiences with a similar model.
Neutral: Several commentors remarked on the high level of attention and discussion generated by the auction of this SF90 Spider. @Last_Roadster compared it with his own experience, mentioning that this particular SF90 has a fabulous spec while emphasizing that he chose a different model for personal reasons. @OT51 shared his satisfaction as a current owner, stating it is the best performance Ferrari he has owned and discussed potential warranty concerns. @casciomotors (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the service history and factory warranty, contributing to the transparency of the auction.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns about driving these impressive vehicles, with @CarNut63 expressing regret that such amazing cars are not driven more often. @OT51 voiced worries about warranty coverage specifically regarding the battery and its components, reflecting common apprehensions about hybrid technology in high-performance cars. Additionally, @scott_S had a non-constructive comment flagged, which suggests not all responses were received positively. Lastly, other comments acknowledged the expensive nature of the options available for the SF90, which could deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gmmuscleusa appreciates the vehicle's nostalgic appeal, noting that the 80s/90s style is making a comeback and that this model, the Poncho, embodies that era's vibe. @PaulRTregurtha expresses admiration for the customization of the car, respecting the personal choices made for enjoyment rather than conforming to purist expectations. @oldsmobile98 reminisces about the car's dreamy qualities from his childhood, likening it to a vibrant Hot Wheels car, which evokes a sense of nostalgia and fun.
Neutral: @canponcho raises a question about the upholstery design concerning bucket seat covers, seeking clarity on why matching patterns front to back isn't standard practice. @ShineOn acknowledges @artreality's comment on the car, appreciating the shared sentiment and the beauty of the vehicle, while subtly reinforcing the idea that beauty is subjective. Williewilliam (The Seller) highlights the vehicle as a unique build and encourages potential buyers not to miss the opportunity to own this singular model.
Negative: @oldsmobile98 critiques the practicality of the car, stating that the absence of side windows restricts its usability and suggesting a preference for either a stock Tempest or mild restomod over more outlandish modifications. @Justification reflects negatively, mentioning the evolution of the vehicle's aesthetic from a potentially impressive mid-70s and 90s look to its current state, evoking memories of ZZ Top, which may imply a decline in taste rather than appreciation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments regarding the Ferrari 812 GTS highlight its stunning aesthetic appeal and impeccable specifications. @GDogg describes it as "an absolutely stunning 812 GTS in Grigio Scuro," complementing the car's looks and suggesting it has a beautiful color and eye-popping interior. Many commentors, including @Dollycat3 and @Last_Roadster, echo this sentiment by praising the color combination, with @Dollycat3 specifically calling it "absolutely gorgeous." The Seller, @MWCRLN, received widespread approval for the car's flawless condition and impressive options, suggesting that it presents as new and is well-maintained, benefiting from the Ferrari 7-Year Genuine Maintenance Program.
Neutral: Comments also reflect a sense of curiosity about the vehicle's market potential and the ongoing auction. @Mandinga poses a question about the vehicle's market performance in the upcoming days, suggesting a comparison between the 812 GTS and a spec'd out new 12 Cilindri. @Last_Roadster notes that the auction is already drawing significant interest, with bids exceeding MSRP. The Seller has also addressed potential buyers directly, highlighting the history and care put into maintaining the vehicle, which adds transparency and reassurance to potential bidders. Furthermore, comments like those from @BiloSelhi express interest in the vehicle's past maintenance and any potential issues, indicative of a thorough interest in its condition.
Negative: While predominantly positive, some comments express skepticism or caution regarding the vehicle. @BiloSelhi and @kurtbradley voice concerns about the car's maintenance history and whether enough driving has occurred to prevent issues such as flat spots on tires or corrosion. @N1N2 humorously questions if the poolside location could cause corrosion problems, indicating an awareness of potential risks despite the car's impressive appearance. Others, like @ant, delve into the somewhat cliché scenario of luxury cars at pools, pointing out it serves as an advertising gimmick over time. Overall, the vehicle receives mostly positive comments, but some concern about its maintenance and market dynamics lingers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Roadrunner_CT praised the car's fantastic build, suggesting a small lift to make it perfect, while @BustaRib described it as his favorite BMW wagon among his four owned. He emphasized the enjoyment the next owner will have, whether driving it as-is or modifying it into a performance vehicle. Many commenters, including @3PedalPosse and @Tripledigit, testified to the seller's attention to detail and the car's significant performance upgrades, with multiple people expressing excitement about the vehicle's aesthetic and functionality.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific details about the vehicle, such as performance capability and features, including the estimated power output with modifications from @ericjwi, and whether the car would pass emissions tests from @catneck and @Asdspeed. @illirep inquired about photos of the current driver seat condition, while @BustaRib provided thorough explanations about the car's modifications and maintenance history. The seller's communication was noted positively, addressing concerns and questions consistently and promptly.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, some concerns were raised about minor imperfections and potential issues. @Asdspeed mentioned wanting to know more about rust on the undercarriage and whether the vehicle would pass smog tests, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding emissions regulations with the modifications. Additionally, @thehotcarlot pointed out a possible issue with dye from the seats, to which @BustaRib explained it was a timing mishap relating to a recent touch-up. Some comments alluded to concerns about potential maintenance costs associated with the performance modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @amotorsports (The Seller) described the TJ Wrangler as a great vehicle for fun weekend outings and off-road adventures. They mentioned numerous new parts and indicated that it runs strong, suggesting reliability. Furthermore, @MattMoore also complimented the Jeep, calling it a pretty vehicle and expressing interest in its condition, showing interest in its potential during bidding.
Neutral: Several potential buyers expressed a desire for more information about the vehicle, with @TristanvG asking about its service history and condition, as well as why it had remained in inventory for a while. @PittJD made arrangements to view the vehicle, while @Harleymon sought clarification about the Jeep's frame rust and the absence of a driving video, indicating a general interest in the inspection and assessment of the vehicle with a focus on transparency.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the Jeep's rust, particularly around the rear control arms, by @Harleymon, which might deter some buyers who are worried about structural issues. @TristanvG's inquiry about how long the vehicle had been in inventory hinted at potential doubts about the Jeep's desirability or condition. Moreover, the delay in providing a driving video suggested a lack of immediate transparency that could lead to suspicion among bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous commenters praised the vehicle, with @Mandinga remarking on the classic look of the Launch 992.1 GT3 color, while @PulseCheck expressed that it embodies "Porsche perfection!" @boaboyoz highlighted the aesthetics, specifically the Shark Blue color of the GT3, calling it a "superb specimen". Additional compliments came from @bg4ltpc, who noted the vehicle's excellent specifications including buckets and ceramics, and @RayoZ emphasized the car's meticulous maintenance, pointing out its impressive DME report and comprehensive PPF coverage. @Brian911 also added that the car is beautiful and flawless, praising the owner's attention to detail.
Neutral: Several comments expressed curiosity about specific features of the vehicle, such as @Caymanorcarrera who questioned the practicality of choosing the bucket seats, given their limited adjustments for road use. @Buck80 inquired about the extent of paint protection film (PPF) coverage, while @tg716 sought clarification about a steering wheel replacement noted in the service records. @MattsMistakes46 contributed by suggesting that bucket seats might be better for posture compared to standard sofas. @RayoZ also addressed concerns about seat comfort, confirming that while the backrest does not recline, using a small pillow can provide lumbar support for long drives.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle, though inquiries from @superavant about any track use or prior smoking raised some concerns, suggesting negative associations often linked with GT3s. However, @Woodchipper39, the seller, promptly clarified that this GT3 had no track use or smoking history, providing reassurance to potential buyers. Overall, comments leaned more towards curiosity and admiration rather than criticism.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @SpeedyV commented on the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, referring to it as a 'beauty.' Similarly, @motoringwealth expressed enthusiasm about its performance, indicating that with a few more modifications, it would be a 'chef's kiss.' @1995Z28LT1 highlighted that the undercarriage is 'sparkly clean,' implying that the vehicle has been well cared for and showing confidence in its condition. Overall, these comments suggest a strong appreciation for the car's looks and performance, along with a recognition of its maintenance history.
Neutral: The seller, @MCS4FUN, provided detailed information about the vehicle's history and modifications, addressing potential inquiries from interested buyers. They clarified what items come with the sale, including specific accessories showcased in the photos. The seller also explained why they are selling the vehicle, attributing it to the impracticality of having the car in a rural area where other vehicle types are favored, and the distance required for any specialized service. Additionally, there was a discussion regarding emissions testing where @mphjr noted that emissions checks are not stringent where they live.
@RoninEvolution inquired about cruise control and speaker controls on the steering wheel, to which @MCS4FUN responded that they were unsure of their presence due to limited need to remove components for their own use. They also provided insight into the vehicle's interior trim colors and additional items included in the sale.
Negative: Despite the predominantly positive feedback, there are some neutral aspects to consider. For instance, @whoosh questioned why the seller is parting with such a valued vehicle, suggesting some concerns over the seller’s intentions. There is also mention of an open safety recall concerning a malfunction in the front passenger seat occupancy sensor, which @MCS4FUN disclosed to potential buyers, indicating it had not been addressed. Such issues could raise apprehensions among prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's readiness and safety.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its standout performance and unique modifications. @Howdoo noted their personal experience with the car, highlighting its excellent acceleration and the positive impact of its Vredestein tires. @PatBlanch echoed this sentiment, calling it one of the nicest driving MGAs they've encountered at numerous meetups and appreciating its high-quality restoration. Additionally, @MisterRob appreciated the dual windscreen options provided with the vehicle, further emphasizing its versatility and appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @Riley58, engaged actively with potential bidders, responding to several inquiries regarding the car's features and modifications. For instance, when asked about the engine, @Riley58 clarified that the vehicle has a 5-main bearing engine from an MGB, and they provided details about the restoration process that took place in Fresno, California. Various questions about specifics, like the ability to remove decals and the functionality of the windshield wipers, were addressed, indicating that @Riley58 was transparent and informative throughout the auction process.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the appearance of a crack or split in the gas tank as noted by @mandeman1949. @Riley58 assured bidders that this area was actually a seam for reinforcement but acknowledged that there might be extra parts that wouldn't fit inside the car for shipping. Additionally, @nexttime raised practical concerns about meeting safety inspection requirements in their locality, specifically asking if all necessary components like wipers and lights were functional, to which @Riley58 provided reassuring answers.
![]() |
16k-Mile 2021 Land Rover Range Rover HSE P525 LWB Westminster Edition
SALGS5SE0MA415553
Lot 237937
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: The comments regarding the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its impressive performance and luxurious features. @Storm33 simply expresses admiration with "Wow – nice one!" while @Mr_White appreciates the maintenance schedule, stating it's commendable that oil changes are done every 5,000 miles. @paomien35 praises the driving experience, sharing fond memories of their own Range Rover, suggesting that this model is among the best. Additionally, @Chi_PT mentions their positive experiences with newer Range Rovers, emphasizing that modern models are not the maintenance nightmares of the past, reinforcing the perceived quality of the vehicle in question. Several users commend the seller, @genevamotorcars, for his reputation and expertise in handling such vehicles.
Neutral: There are some inquiries and discussions that suggest a cautious approach towards certain aspects of the vehicle without overt negativity. @Mr_White raises a valid question regarding the replacement windshield, which initially sparked a conversation about the type of glass used and its features. The seller responds professionally, clarifying that the windshield is OEM and discussing its thermal comfort properties. @TCCJ and @ColoradoLee seek additional information about various features and options concerning the tow package and license plate holder, with the seller providing informative answers about what is included and how the features work, which keeps the conversation balanced.
Negative: On the downside, there are hints of skepticism regarding the vehicle's pricing and ultimate value. @Bob2457 expresses concerns over inflated prices during the COVID pandemic and questions the justification for the vehicle's listed price, while @thepeter53 notes that the conversation about initial costs may be irrelevant due to depreciation concerns. This reflects a more cautious stance toward the overall investment in the vehicle. Additionally, @dj_over raises a specific concern about a potential tear on the steering wheel airbag cover, which underscores a desire for transparency about the vehicle’s condition, although the seller quickly alleviates this concern by confirming it was only dirt.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle show overwhelming appreciation for its aesthetic and performance qualities. @Rlgss expressed a desire for a short bed version, indicating an enthusiasm for the model. @greatscott simply stated it was 'very nice,' while @LoxRiver praised the great color combination and tasteful interior, calling it one of the nicest 1972 K10's they have seen. Several users, including @dhonthehill and @boaboyoz, echoed sentiments of admiration, praising the build quality and detailing of the truck, with @Escalon_Customs (The Seller) affirming the restoration efforts involved. @chaparralman1974 also appreciated the powerful engine, further enhancing the consensus of excellence among commenters.
Neutral: Some interactions centered around requests for information and clarifications about the vehicle and its components. @Nifski inquired about the transmission and transfer case, while @chaparralman1974 asked about adjustments made to accommodate the 700R4 transmission. @Escalon_Customs (The Seller) responded thoroughly to these queries, indicating that the components were rebuilt rather than replaced as new, and confirming the engine positioning modifications made for the truck's configuration. Additionally, @mrdcjr's request for a driving video indicates an interest in observing the vehicle's performance beyond its appearance.
Negative: While most comments were positive, there were hints of skepticism regarding the perceived value of the vehicle. @deadh expressed confusion over its value compared to a stock version owned by a friend, questioning the features that justify the vehicle's condition and pricing despite acknowledging its beauty. This indicates that while the truck is highly regarded, there are still some readers who might require clarification on its market appeal or value in comparison to less modified versions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 1923 Ford T Bucket, appreciating its unique hot rod design and the opportunity to bid on such a classic vehicle. @foreignluxury (The Seller) highlighted the car's characteristics, mentioning how the T Bucket maintains original styling from the Ford Model T while being significantly modified. @heeltoeoversteer praised the T Bucket as a cool hot rod and received clarification about its features, indicating that the aesthetics and customization elements enhance its appeal. Other bidders like @ryandad and @krisk1913 expressed gratitude for the auction and the seller's informative responses, which foster a sense of community engagement around the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @foreignluxury, provided detailed explanations about the T Bucket's features, including its front suspension setup, engine characteristics, and the overall significance of the T Bucket in the hot rod community. They clarified misconceptions about the design, stating the term 'suicide setup' regarding the front suspension and elaborating on the bucket-shaped body style that defines the vehicle. Comments such as those from @mike_rockwell and others reflect on the subjective nature of personalizing T Buckets, indicating that the variety in builds speaks to the car's history and personal interpretations among hot rod enthusiasts.
Negative: Some comments indicated a divide in appreciation for the T Bucket, with users like @gatzkers flagging a comment as non-constructive, suggesting that not all viewers found the car appealing. @foreignluxury addressed this feedback politely, acknowledging that not every car appeals to every buyer while thanking users for their presence. Additionally, @mike_rockwell's comment about the unique adaptations of T Buckets containing fenders suggested some potential limitations based on state regulations, hinting at challenges that could impact certain buyers' interest.
![]() |
1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 Ronnie Sox Signature Series 5-Speed
1FACP40E0LF186111
Lot 237941
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed nostalgia and appreciation for this unique vehicle, particularly highlighting its historical significance tied to racing legend Ronnie Sox. @wvtrakpak mentioned that they loved these cars in the 80s, hoping it finds a new owner who recognizes its special qualities. @p1_motorcars_ltd called it a "cool and rare bird" and suggested modifications that could enhance its appeal. @johnnydarkgt350 and @NVGT350 shared their admiration for Ronnie Sox's legendary status, emphasizing that such a car deserves better treatment and should be cherished for its heritage.
Neutral: A few comments revealed uncertainty regarding the vehicle's unique styling, with @z282slo noting that the additions to the car deviated from the classic 5.0L notchback's simplicity. @justification humorously compared it to aftermarket parts, hinting at mixed feelings about its design. The seller, @gmkrazy61, acknowledged that opinions on the car varied, but emphasized its original condition and historical importance, catering to both collectors and enthusiasts of fox-body Mustangs.
Negative: Criticism primarily focused on the vehicle's modifications, with several users feeling that the ground effects and wheels detracted from its appeal. @carcrazyrdm lamented the aesthetics of the car, stating it needed saving from the ground effects. @saywhen echoed this sentiment, finding it hard to appreciate despite being a Fox Body fan. Many commentators, including @longducdong, expressed that the car's design did not resonate with their tastes, leaving them confused about its appeal in the current auto collectible market.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PS919 remarked on the appealing design of the air suspension, complimenting the visual effect of the tires appearing to be almost tucked, which adds to the vehicle's attractiveness. Another commendation comes from @5692carguy, who ensures that the vehicle's headliner is in great shape, responding positively to inquiries about potential issues.
Neutral: There were several inquiries regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly from @777AIA, who asked if the transmission, transfer case, and differential fluids had been serviced at 40k intervals. @5692carguy (The Seller) confirmed they would follow up with the dealer to gather more details about the vehicle's service records, showing proactive communication regarding maintenance.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the lack of transparency in the service records, especially regarding essential fluid changes that were not visible in the documentation. @777AIA expressed unease about whether significant maintenance tasks, like the drive belt replacement, had been completed, indicating potential gaps in the vehicle's upkeep history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its impressive build quality and eye-catching aesthetics. @mef0629 described it as a 'Beautiful build' despite finding its rear lights odd. @SnoDawg highlighted the 'nice looking US Spec FJ40' and loved its stance with the 33's and lift. @timberframe admired the serious build while retaining original features, and @stevedore1 expressed a desire to own it, calling it a beauty amidst concerns about the price. @Wmflyfisher and @cstav86 both complimented the vehicle's height and overall perfection. Commenters like @FJ-77 and @greenlghtgo, current or past customers of Voodoo Cruisers, attested to their quality, referencing their own positive experiences with vehicles built by the same shop and sharing satisfaction with the attention to detail displayed in the vehicle.
Neutral: Some requests for information and logistical inquiries were made without any strong sentiment expressed. @Tacoslob asked if the vehicle was available for inspection, and various commenters inquired about specific features, such as the source of the aluminum radiator (@gogounou) and details about the suspension system (@Wmflyfisher). @lewis1 asked about the overall height of the truck to determine if it would fit under their lift. The commenters were curious about the vehicle’s specifications, including the hood's year and the running boards, demonstrating interest without expressing a clear positive or negative opinion. Voodoo Cruisers, the seller, responded effectively to these inquiries, providing detailed and informative answers.
Negative: The vehicle did face some criticism from a couple of commenters. @HAYETHERE simply exclaimed 'Oof!', implying a strong negative reaction, while @boaboyoz humorously mentioned the vehicle as 'a magnificent Marion FJ40.' Additionally, there was a suggestion from @Chamba about needing a different steering wheel to improve the vehicle's aesthetic further, although this was more of a constructive critique rather than outright negative commentary. However, these comments represented a minimal portion of the overall feedback, which was predominantly positive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's striking Aqua Blue Metallic color paired with Luxor Beige leather, highlighting it as a beautiful and underrated combination. Commenters like @ICBM and @GotGTS praise the aesthetic appeal of the Sport Design wheels and the unique color choice. @boaboyoz emphasizes the rarity and beauty of the car, while @BMWE90Guy loves the specs, including the natural aspiration engine and other features like sport chrono and sport exhaust. The praises extend to @2FAM as a trustworthy seller, with multiple commenters sharing positive experiences about working with him.
Neutral: Various users engage in discussions about the vehicle's specifications, features, and service history. @ziodesign and @Gkp200 inquire about maintenance history and documentation, including past services done. @2FAM responds to questions, stating that while he does not have comprehensive records at present, he is in the process of contacting the previous owner. Multiple commenters seek confirmation on the car's condition, asking about specifics like tire age and brake status, demonstrating a balanced interest in understanding the vehicle's needs.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the car's lack of detailed maintenance records and the pressing need for a 40,000-mile service. @adamfam points out that the car might require new tires and brakes after purchase, voicing skepticism about the seller's assurance regarding the vehicle's condition. The sentiment among some users suggests hesitation about bidding without clearer information on maintenance and potential costs, with @kmarku criticizing the persistence of such concerns as unnecessary repetition, indicating frustration within the auction atmosphere.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @br4m, provided helpful information about the vehicle's capacity and dimensions, stating that it can seat eight passengers in the back and has a total length of 4.65 meters. Additionally, @br4m was responsive to requests for videos, promptly uploading them to showcase the vehicle, which indicates a high level of customer service. Another comment by @TheDailyVroom pointed out the potential cost-effectiveness of importing the vehicle, suggesting that it may be a smart financial decision despite shipping and duties.
Neutral: Several comments provided logistical inquiries about shipping and speed, including @knbnnttt's question on the shipping costs to the US and whether the seller could assist with port arrangements. @knbnnttt also inquired about the vehicle's top speed, to which @br4m responded that he had not tested it but speculated it would not exceed the 60 to 62 mph range. @prefecture added context about the vehicle's characteristics, labeling it as a decommissioned military soft-top tractor, which helps clarify its intended use and limitations.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding potential issues with the vehicle's design, specifically regarding water leakage if the roof rack were to be removed. @knbnnttt expressed concern that the removal of the roof rack might lead to leaks, to which @br4m affirmed that the possibility of leaking would indeed increase. @prefecture also highlighted that keeping the interior dry may not be feasible with this type of vehicle, indicating it might not be suitable for everyone, particularly those needing a reliable waterproof vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Crazy_Canadian recalls fond memories of purchasing a 1960s Ford Transit Ambulance for European travel, expressing excitement about the Mercedes 410 VAN Firetruck for similar adventures. @on-the-road-again (The Seller) responds positively, emphasizing the vehicle's reliability, smoothness, and ease of driving. The Seller acknowledges interest from potential buyers, offering assistance for shipping the vehicle to the USA and detailing the options for transportation. @CKKurtz finds the vehicle cooler than a Sprinter and envisions it being converted into a Mountain Bike Race Team Truck, suggesting its versatility.
Neutral: @bringatrailer informs the community about an update regarding the auction stating it was mistakenly launched as a No Reserve listing, and that this has been corrected to accurately reflect a reserve is in place. @on-the-road-again (The Seller) also addresses this by discussing specifics about the timing chain and engine details. Furthermore, the Seller provides precise dimensions of the vehicle and technical specifications, enhancing potential buyers' understanding of what they are bidding on.
Negative: @mazb inquires about the presence of rust, noting it is hard to find one with power steering. However, the existence of minor cosmetic marks on the vehicle is brought up by @on-the-road-again (The Seller), who features images of the affected area and confirms it is otherwise in clean and well-preserved condition, having spent its life in a dry environment. Despite this reassurance, the concern about potential need for touch-ups reflects existing worries about the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive features and aesthetics. @Bill_GMC noted that it's the first 1978 GMC pickup he's seen equipped with power door locks and praised its appearance, stating, "Great looking truck, it should do well." @GMT400Man echoed similar sentiments, describing it as a "very nice truck" and admitting he would be tempted to buy it if it fit his budget. @oldskool4x4 also recognized its desirability by stating it is "nicely optioned" and should do well in the market.
Neutral: The seller, @Vintagecorvette, has actively engaged with potential buyers and responded to various inquiries. They promised to provide photos of the bed without the mat and clarified the tank size, estimating it to be around 16 gallons. Additionally, they confirmed that the truck had been repainted, indicating that it was originally a single color and has now been updated to a two-tone finish. @fl32rgc brought up various questions, including about the AC system, which the seller addressed with details about its functionality.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle. @fl32rgc was particularly inquisitive about the AC system, questioning whether it blows air but is not cold, leading @Vintagecorvette to confirm that while the fan operates, the compressor does not function. This issue could deter potential buyers who are looking for a fully operational vehicle. Furthermore, @cadcambu questioned whether the paint was original, to which @Plan9man clarified it had indeed been repainted, potentially affecting its collector's value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance and condition, noting that it looks great. @bobcullinan specifically requested videos of a cold start and the car driving on the road, which indicates interest in seeing the car's performance and mechanics firsthand. The seller has acknowledged these requests and noted that the car drives very well, reassuring potential buyers with uploaded videos showcasing the engine running perfectly cold.
Neutral: Discussions about the engine's state post-restoration reveal that it was overhauled in 2016, and the seller, @dgclassiccars, clarified that the engine was completely restored with all components replaced, which suggests good maintenance. However, it is also noted that the owner has used the car very few times since the restoration due to work commitments. The lack of available invoices for the restoration work raises questions about the documentation of the engine overhaul, making some commenters curious about the specifics of the work performed on the engine.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the absence of invoices for the restoration work done on the engine, which might lead to uncertainty about the quality or extent of the repairs. Additionally, questions were posed regarding the installation of safety belts for the car, implying that there may be some safety features that prospective buyers need to consider or improve. Overall, while the vehicle is generally received well, there are hints of apprehension related to its documentation and safety upgrades.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @timberframe described the FJ Cruiser as a "Nice looking FJCruiser," while @odzilla praised it as "bad ass." The seller, @90IROC, highlighted the vehicle's impressive condition, emphasizing that it runs and drives well, with no mechanical issues and a thorough inspection ensuring everything works perfectly. The FJ is described as a "very clean and very cool TRD Edition," appealing to potential buyers by mentioning the original parts available and the absence of modifications that could detract from its original appeal.
Neutral: Multiple comments indicate a strong interest in the vehicle, with @palliewaulie playfully addressing it as "Hello big sexy" and @zmcm999 inquiring about any fluid leaks in the CV axle. The seller responded promptly, reassuring @zmcm999 that there are no leaks from the CV axles and directing attention to the photos that depict the vehicle's clean undercarriage. This interaction showcases potential buyers' curiosity and the seller's willingness to provide transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There are no negative comments noted in the discussion about the FJ Cruiser. The seller's detailed responses appear to effectively address any concerns raised, such as the inquiry about fluid leaks, with specific reassurances that the vehicle is in excellent shape and free of any issues.
![]() |
Fuel-Injected, 427-Powered Backdraft Racing RT4B Roadster 6-Speed
AE9BMAAHXM1MT1193
Lot 237947
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its beauty and impressive build quality, with @Autopex exclaiming it is "Beautiful!" and @Rummie stating that it's an "Absolutely beautiful build!" @TedHopson mentioned it is one of the nicest Cobras he has seen, expressing admiration for the attention to detail and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Luv2Travel and @Dolce71 both noted the car's aesthetic appeal, with Dolce71 specifically appreciating that, despite being a replica, this one is done exceptionally well. Commenters highlighted the striking color scheme and sound quality of the vehicle, with @up2BAT emphasizing how the color really sets it off.
Neutral: The seller, @Delemego, engaged with various questions regarding the car's specifications, including its registration, tire specifications, and comfort options. The seller clarified that the vehicle is registered in Montana as a 1965 replica, while emphasizing the custom modifications made over four years. Discussions about tires ensued, with @WNGD inquiring about the tread on the tires and the seller confirming that they are Hoosier drag radials. Furthermore, the seller addressed concerns regarding comfort by explaining the features aimed at taller drivers, providing a well-rounded overview of the car's characteristics and functionalities.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's legality and practicality in various states. @WNGD expressed skepticism about the "treadless" tires on the Cobra, questioning their registration viability and safety. Additionally, @kubist wondered about the rationale behind selling the car, as they felt it deserved to be driven more often. @switz inquired about the car's title status in California, highlighting potential complications with import regulations, while @greatnorth510 questioned the assembly location of the car concerning Canadian import laws. These comments indicate a mix of enthusiasm tempered by inquiries about regulatory issues and the feasibility of ownership.
![]() |
200Tdi-Powered 1990 Land Rover Defender 110 Hi-Cap Pickup 5-Speed
SALLDHHB8FA403777
Lot 237949
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @WAGONBOYTD expressed great admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising the engine swap to the 200 TDI, which they consider to be a perfect upgrade for a model that was born with a less powerful engine. They mentioned enjoying the driving experience, noting how the driver skillfully navigated the vehicle's gearbox, showcasing its functionality. @70_duster and @hshillsh also complimented the aesthetics and overall beauty of the truck, while @armansarkissian (The Seller) shared enthusiasm for the interest and positive feedback received on the vehicle. Furthermore, the seller highlighted useful upgrades and pictures to assist potential buyers, demonstrating a genuine effort to present the truck attractively.
Neutral: Comments from @GBRBILL and @armansarkissian (The Seller) mentioned tire upgrades, indicating they see room for improvement in the truck's specifications. @armansarkissian acknowledged the suggestions while clarifying the reasoning behind certain design choices made during the build. Additionally, @2hecknback offered practical feedback on the utility aspects of the truck, like cargo height and interior details, hinting at personal preference rather than a definitive criticism. @carlivar raised concerns regarding registration issues in California, which the seller addressed by noting their personal experiences with Montana plates, showing they are not taking the concerns lightly but rather viewing them through a realistic lens.
Negative: Some negative sentiments were expressed regarding the truck's configuration and functionality. @2hecknback criticized lifted Defenders for compromising bed height, suggesting that this affects the vehicle's utility. They also pointed out the need for additional features like a proper headliner and spare mounting. @carlivar lamented the vehicle's unregisterable status in California's current climate, highlighting a significant barrier for potential buyers. Lastly, @troutbum311 inquired about the heating system, which was noted as having some malfunctions by @armansarkissian (The Seller), indicating a potential concern for future users regarding comfort and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @14u2b commented positively about the Chevelle's appearance with, "Great looking Chevelle, Good job on the videos… Best wishes on your auction." @JayKay2430 appreciated the choice not to add SS emblems, remarking, "Thank you for not adding SS emblems to this Malibu!" @RMQ333 seconded this sentiment by echoing JayKay2430's comment. Overall, the comments reflect an appreciation for the car's aesthetics and its authenticity, particularly in maintaining its Malibu identity without unnecessary embellishments.
Neutral: @MooseChevelle asked several detailed questions to clarify various aspects of the vehicle's specifications and performance, indicating a thorough interest in the car from a potential buyer's perspective. The seller @RambleProvisions responded to these inquiries by providing information about the engine, transmission, and restoration process, which included a frame-off refurbishment. This exchange shows an engagement in understanding the car's condition and history, underlining its importance in the auction process.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, there were concerns raised about certain facets of the car. MooseChevelle pointed out the A/C system's failure to blow cold air, with the seller admitting that the compressor has not been diagnosed yet. There was also a discussion regarding the historic wheels on the car, with @ssterry suggesting that a wheel change could enhance its cool factor. Additionally, the lack of detailed build photographs and the presence of only invoices for parts and service raised some doubts about the car's restoration quality and completeness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and modifications. @Fartparts finds the car incredibly tempting, emphasizing its tasteful modifications. @A10moondog praises the unique color combination of Strato Blue Mica over gray leather, noting its rarity and beauty in sunlight. Additionally, @Lestat has developed an appreciation for the NB2 Miata, contributing to the positive sentiment around the vehicle's visual appeal. @A10moondog also compliments the thorough list of questions and answers provided by @jsg757, showcasing the transparency that enhances buyer confidence.
Neutral: Several comments raised practical questions about the vehicle while also providing constructive observations. @Selonari asked about the rear right suspension arm's bolt, prompting @jsg757 to confirm the issue and order a replacement. @BirdIsDaWord inquired about the roll bar's installation and the stock radio, leading to informative exchanges with @jsg757, who clarified that the roll bar is bolted, not welded, and provided details on the stereo system. The dialogue reflects a mix of curiosity and shared interest in the car's features, indicating a collaborative spirit among potential buyers and the seller.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the rear suspension. @PullG highlighted the potential missing bolt, suggesting a safety issue that needs addressing. Although @jsg757 assured that the situation was remedied promptly, the initial observation raised doubts among potential buyers. Furthermore, @Selonari questioned the license plate's mounting, which, while answered, indicated some aesthetic choices might not be to everyone’s liking. Overall, while the concerns were addressed, they did add a layer of scrutiny to the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) describes the Silverado as an exceptionally low-mileage, like-new vehicle, emphasizing its near-new condition both inside and out. @BFD also praises the truck, noting it is a stunning example and as clean as a 20-year-old truck can be, reflecting high appreciation for its preservation and appearance.
Neutral: @Res1952 inquires about whether the truck is a 4x4, indicating a potential interest in its specifications without expressing any judgment on its performance or features. @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) confirms the original paint, which acknowledges the concerns about the vehicle's authenticity but does not add value or detract from its appeal.
Negative: @BFD raises a question about the description of the truck’s rear differential, suggesting a potential inaccuracy in the listing regarding the 'locking rear differential.' This comment implies some uncertainty about the specifications and could indicate a lack of trust in the seller's details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect an admiration for the Jowett Jupiter, highlighting its rarity and unique design features. @AliceAustin appreciates its mechanical approach, indicating it would be fun for long drives like Lands End to John O’Groats. @frnloth shares a personal connection, recalling their father's experience with a similar vehicle, while @bakes88 notes another great British maker with a fondness for the car's beauty. @Ganeydad (The Seller) emphasizes its impressive racing history, competitive record, and eligibility for prestigious events, further supported by comments from @vintagehistoric, who sees it as a great opportunity for entry into world-class automotive events. Overall, the general tone denotes a sense of admiration and aesthetic appreciation for the car's design and racing capabilities.
Neutral: Several commenters provide informational insights regarding the car's specifications and historical significance. @Ganeydad mentions the car's weight of just over 700 kg and its competitive performance at events like Le Mans Classic, which interests almost everyone, drawing inquiries about further details. @kyleawestbrook seeks to understand the feasibility of structural modifications, reflecting concerns for future usage. @GlenK expresses practical considerations about parts availability and maintenance, expressing a slight regret over not pursuing ownership, while @lobster requests additional race-related documentation, which is relevant for prospective buyers who value performance data. Collectively, these remarks portray a mixture of interest and consideration, pointing to a comprehensive appreciation of the vehicle's racing and historical context.
Negative: Despite the overall positive vibe, some concerns surface about practical ownership and maintenance challenges. @GlenK points out the difficulties in sourcing parts in Canada, which could deter potential buyers in regions far from the UK. There's also an acknowledgment of modifications required for local racing standards, noted by @kyleawestbrook, which could complicate things for some buyers. Additionally, issues relating to potential non-constructive feedback are raised by @lobster, indicating divergent perspectives on comments made. Overall, while there is enthusiasm surrounding the car, these comments hint at the realities and hurdles prospective owners might face.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Fellow enthusiast @PulseCheck praised the vehicle's performance, describing it as an exciting daily driver with a tune and downpipe that elevates it to supercar status. Others like @RedtailPDX expressed positive sentiments about the model year, considering it the best for the F80 due to its updates and nostalgic design features. Additionally, @unkledunks (The Seller) confirmed that the title lien release was completed in 2023, reassuring potential buyers that it would be properly addressed before the auction ends.
Neutral: Comments from various users indicated curiosity about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding its previous ownership and functionality. @USCooper speculated on the car's usage at the BMW Performance Center in California, providing an interesting perspective on its mileage as potentially influenced by track use. @Blocksteel corrected impressions about wheel fitment, noting that while 20" wheels were commonly ordered, it was also possible to choose different configurations, reflecting on the car's customization options.
Negative: However, there were notable concerns raised by several commenters. @brinsd questioned the accuracy of the Carfax report regarding ownership, and sought clarification on why the vehicle failed Maryland inspection. @Rob_K echoed the need for the seller to resolve an active lien that still appeared against the vehicle, emphasizing potential complications for prospective buyers. Concerns were also raised about the driveshaft replacement noted in the Carfax, with @kmmb asking whether it was linked to a factory recall, hinting at potential underlying issues with the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rodeo_King stated he would prefer this vehicle over the white 86 Testarossa from the Miami Vice series. @Frankieballs agreed, emphasizing their preference with enthusiasm. @Caymanorcarrera highlighted the car's features such as being manual, air cooled, and factory wide body, indicating a strong appreciation for the vehicle. @paulomelo praised the 911 Cabrio, calling it the best looking model ever and complimented its engine. He also noted the unique features like the full leather interior and the Porsche crest in the headrest, which he found rare. @MarkTro, who saw the car at Amelia, underlined its beauty amidst a collection of impressive vehicles.
Neutral: @ciocchettim (The Seller) welcomed participants to the auction, noting he was momentarily away but would keep up with questions. He shared a driving experience remarking on the car’s performance during a trip from Daytona to Amelia, establishing that it is a great driving 911. He addressed @Alexanderl's inquiry regarding a front-end accident, stating that the CARFAX indicated an incident in Oct 2020 but he did not notice signs of significant repairs. He further assessed that the repainting was high quality and affirmed the car's excellent condition. @TD1932 added to the conversation with personal driving experience and how it compares favorably to new models.
Negative: @spartansix raised concerns about staining on the vehicle's underside depicted in specific photos, inquiring about any repair records. In response, @ciocchettim confirmed they investigated the issue and determined it was excess fluid from the brake reservoir without any necessary repairs. This inquiry reflects a cautious approach to vehicle condition amongst potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's stunning design and performance. @a1harix refers to it simply as 'Fantastic!', while @Xman_27 appreciates the meticulous maintenance and exhilarating performance of the car, emphasizing its ability to leave a memorable impression. @old1lotus1 reiterates that the car was well cared for by its previous owner, noting their deep knowledge and obsession with the vehicle. Overall, there is a strong consensus that the 1997 Lotus Esprit V8 is a beautiful, high-performance car that captures attention and admiration.
Neutral: Several commenters make neutral observations regarding the car's features, maintenance records, and logistics. @1600veloce (The Seller) provides detailed information about their service and detailing process, mentioning they are an active seller with 2,280 listings. Questions about shipping logistics and specific features of the car such as emissions compliance are discussed, with @JamesCR inquiring about California emissions issues and @outrun1986 seeking photos of certain labels. These inquiries indicate potential bidders' due diligence as they consider the vehicle.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about emissions regulations and the vehicle's history. @dahli expresses worries about California's strict smog testing, while @Handsofstone bemoans the difficulty of registering such a classic vehicle in certain states. @outrun1986 shares doubts regarding the records of the timing belt service, and actively seeks more information, reflecting concerns potential buyers might have. This kind of feedback might hinder interest for some, as the complexities of ownership in certain locales seem challenging.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Scliffe appreciates the stylish combination of the burgundy top with the white body color, indicating a visually appealing design. @OliverHu finds the overall specification of the vehicle to be very attractive. @Petethecarman also expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle, describing it as a 'sharp Jag,' which suggests that the car has a strong visual appeal and possibly a good reputation.
Neutral: @Tiwasko raises a question regarding specific mechanical components, asking if the cooling pipes, water pump, and thermostat have been changed. @mcqueens (The Seller) responds by assuring that a technician will look into the matter, indicating that customer inquiries are taken seriously. They further mention that a visual inspection shows no signs of issues with the cooling pipes and that the Carfax history indicates the water pump and thermostat are original, suggesting transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @GermanBritlvr expresses a desire for additional information by asking for a walk-around video, a driving video, and details on the top operation, indicating that the available pictures are insufficient. @Snowhill similarly inquires about service records and the specifics of maintenance history, highlighting a potential concern about the vehicle's upkeep, including past services such as oil changes and fluid flushes. These comments suggest that potential buyers are seeking reassurance about the vehicle's maintenance and overall reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Vintage_steel expresses excitement about the vehicle's potential, believing it truly deserves the 'Bring a Trailer' title. @Gmmuscleusa admires the truck's cool aesthetic and emphasizes its impressive running gear, reassuring that it's not just for show. @Lizardbait1 shares a love for the truck's patina, while @CKKurtz calls it a 'Gnarly truck' and predicts a lot of fun. @Harry finds the vehicle to be a special piece, adding to the positive sentiment around it.
Neutral: @IceBolt07 provides detailed information about the truck, nicknamed 'Opie', including its history, modifications, and technical specifications. He mentions the current condition of the truck and the need for a new engine, indicating it has been a long-term project since he purchased it in 2021. @gr33nsc0ut and @Lawaters inquire about additional pictures and possibly include a new motor, showing an interest in the truck's versatility. The seller responds to these queries, ensuring transparency about the truck's features and current state.
Negative: While the truck has many positive attributes, it does have some drawbacks. @pizzaman09 notes the technical complexity with two transfer cases potentially allowing for ultra-slow-speed crawling, hinting at challenges for those unfamiliar with such setups. @IceBolt07 mentions the engine blew twice, indicating reliability issues. @saabvader points out the need to repair the floors, which is a common concern for J Trucks, suggesting that prospective buyers should be prepared for additional work on the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2002 Yukon XL 2500 has received appreciation for its aesthetics, as @DOWNRANGEOPS noted its gorgeous appearance and desirability. The seller, @Strainjah71, has made efforts to maintain the vehicle, recently replacing components like tires and mufflers, which is a positive indicator for potential buyers. Additionally, the vehicle's lights and stereo function properly, confirming some level of reliability for the features offered.
Neutral: @Strainjah71 has mentioned that he has only added about 50 miles since purchasing the vehicle, indicating limited use. There are discussions surrounding the vehicle's gas mileage, which is below 10 miles per gallon, and various inquiries into its condition, including the stereo/video functionality and any upgrades to the differentials. The seller is also open to answering questions regarding modifications and previous auctions, providing a transparent dialogue for prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle have been raised by several commentors. @DOWNRANGEOPS highlighted the frequent ownership changes, questioning the reasons behind three owners in two years, with suspicions about the gas mileage and some cosmetic issues. Furthermore, the headliner is reportedly coming loose and the rhino lining is slightly peeling, which could indicate maintenance issues. Additionally, some electronic components like the rear radio controls and headrest screens need further investigation, pointing to potential electrical problems.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, particularly its maintenance history and overall condition. @nicko praised the well-maintained state of the MB wagon, highlighting its features like the retractable cargo cover. @Carpatrick expressed excitement about the low mileage and condition, suggesting it would make for a great road trip. @Frank_Barrett shared a positive sentiment about Mercedes-Benz vehicles, emphasizing their reliability and performance, especially noting the good condition of the clean underside and fabulous interior of this specific model.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarification on specific features and maintenance aspects of the vehicle. @b4con84 requested clearer photos of the window sticker and inquired about the availability of two keys. @CMB-PA asked several technical questions about the vehicle's condition, such as potential issues with the front grill and control arms, acknowledging the car’s good overall impression. @Racertom and @Fbmpeej posed inquiries regarding the malfunctioning left headlight, which led @chuckgoolsbee to provide detailed information on the issue and repair considerations.
Negative: Concerns about potential repairs and vehicle issues were raised by some commenters. @CMB-PA queried about signs of rust and other mechanical concerns, indicating scrutiny of the car’s condition. @Racertom questioned the functionality of the headlight control unit, revealing a known issue with the left headlight not working. @srhashimi added to the concerns by mentioning that driving at night would be illegal with the headlight malfunction, raising doubts about the car's drivability until the problem is resolved.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bobrk mentioned that it’s an awesome looking car, indicating it has visual appeal. @LiamInerfeld expressed admiration for the vehicle, stating it is really nice, which suggests that the aesthetic design of the older A4 is appreciated. Furthermore, @Ippy00 noted the choice to use a stainless steel ECS exhaust system to prevent rust, showcasing an attention to quality and durability in the vehicle's build.
Neutral: Several commentors raised questions about the vehicle's condition and functionalities. @gordo514 inquired about the operability of the sunroof and its associated noise, while @DaysofThundr46 sought clarification on the vehicle's ability to pass smog checks, indicating there might be some ambiguity about emissions compliance. Additionally, @Ippy00 addressed these concerns, assuring that the car should pass emissions as there are no codes and that the catalytic converter is in place.
Negative: Concern was expressed regarding mechanical issues associated with the vehicle. @bobrk doubted its ability to pass smog checks, which may raise alarms for potential purchasers. Furthermore, @quattro5 questioned the frequency of repairs on the coils and valve cover gasket, suggesting a lack of confidence in the vehicle's reliability. @gordo514 also pointed out a note about a sunroof rattle that might further complicate purchase negotiations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster appreciates the iconic design of the 57 Chevy, expressing admiration for its lines. @Slam105 finds the 'Handyman' to be as cool as a Nomad, celebrating its charm. The seller, @bbracco99, shares their positive experiences with potential buyers and enthusiasts, noting a great in-person visit with a fellow Tri-Five enthusiast and highlighting the vehicle’s strong performance during test drives.
Neutral: @capecodmike questions why the previous buyer did not finalize the purchase, which @willie2323 clarifies was due to the vehicle not meeting its reserve price. The seller, @bbracco99, keeps bidders updated on the auction status and addresses potential buyers' inquiries, indicating a high level of engagement and transparency throughout the sale process.
Negative: @Bigg4104 points out shortcomings in the car's suspension and the need for a complete paint job, suggesting these issues may detract from its overall appeal. This critique indicates that while the car has many attractive features, it also has significant areas requiring improvement that may impact buyer interest.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express appreciation for the truck's features and overall aesthetic. @mike_rockwell describes it as a "kool old rig" and expresses interest in driving it. @Wamahu acknowledges the unit's quality and inquires if it is ready to roll, implying a positive view. Seller @IQ555 asserts the truck's value, indicating it is worth over $35,000 based on market conditions and encourages serious bidders to engage.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarification and express curiosity about specific features of the truck, particularly regarding the transmission. @Piros1 questions the discrepancies in the transmission listings, wondering if it may have been swapped out, while @BDavid and others provide insights and explanations about the shift pattern and functionality of the transmission. @Mluker asks about a specific brake in the pictures, and @spivak-1 inquires about when they would need to remove the truck, indicating neutral concern about logistics.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism about the auction process and the truck's condition. @Wamahu raises concerns about price increases linked to a single bidder, suggesting suspicious bidding behavior. @Kellyroy questions whether the truck is in working condition or requires repairs, noting that one brake appears manually disengaged. @Piros1 also shares doubts about the transmission's authenticity, implying the potential for a swapped out part, which raises questions about the truck's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is described as an exceptional, low mileage 1957 BMW Isetta 300 Motocoupe, retaining its original parts and showcasing impressive restoration efforts. @lilcarlover (The Seller) highlights that this model has an actual mileage reading of 18,599 miles and has been well-preserved, having been kept in a private collection since 1992. The car's Japanrot single-stage paint, interior condition, and included original items such as the OEM tool roll and jack have drawn compliments from several commenters, including @RidleysRides, who appreciates its beauty and history. The car generates excitement and praise from enthusiasts, illustrating its charm and significance among microcars, which @lilcarlover emphasizes by stating it deserves the title "King of the Microcars."
Neutral: @lilcarlover (The Seller) provides details regarding the car's condition and history, sharing insights into its maintenance and enhancements, such as the professional repainting and recent mechanical servicing. Also noted are the original accessories included with the vehicle, which contribute to its collector appeal. Commenters express curiosity about specifics, such as the car's dimensions and features, leading to informative exchanges about the vehicle’s components and potential for customization. Generally, the discussion revolves around the unique aspects of the Isetta 300, its historical significance, and the impact it has on people who encounter it.
Negative: While the vehicle is praised generally, there are minor concerns raised regarding aspects like the aging of the tires, which have some minor crazing due to age. @51North mentions the potential for restoring the horn but indicates it is a simple fix since the existing one is functional. Additionally, @bjl57 inquires about storage options after purchase, indicating potential logistical challenges buyers might face following the auction. Also, @trailerman shares a nostalgic anecdote about the Isetta's performance, which could suggest that some may perceive its driving capabilities as limited, particularly compared to modern vehicles, highlighting its role more as a collector's item rather than a practical car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed interest in the vehicle, highlighting its appeal and performance. @MitchHungLynch mentioned that SL550 roadsters are exceptional fun and fast, sharing positive personal experiences with similar vehicles. @Randrighetto (The Seller) also noted that the car runs great and has undergone regular maintenance, which is an encouraging sign for potential buyers. Additionally, there was recognition of the transparency in how the auction was presented, with appreciation for the detailed responses to questions.
Neutral: Several comments raised technical questions and concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle, such as the leather condition and the history of repairs, including accident damages. @Smithabq and @Chirodoc67 both posed a series of inquiries regarding the car’s repair status and service history, highlighting the importance of thorough documentation. The discussions also included potential remedies for the seats' appearance, as several commenters pondered the necessity of professional detailing or seat cover replacements.
Negative: Some comments pointed out significant concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly the state of the seats and potential hidden issues. @shoggy1970 expressed disappointment over the seats being in poor condition for a car with 50K miles, questioning the seller's maintenance of the vehicle. @Remy22 raised issues about the leather's appearance, while others like @dmeyer2806 and @Kynagidas highlighted worries about the car's mechanical sounds and the clarity of service records. There's a general vibe of skepticism among some commenters regarding the transparency of the vehicle's history, indicating that potential buyers may need more reassurance before committing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters appreciated the vehicle's aesthetic quality and condition, highlighting its smart appearance and unique color. @PaulCedar remarked on the clean look of the Spider and its attractive wheels, expressing optimism for potential bidders. @Pignose reminisced about owning a similar model, emphasizing that this car appeared in better condition than when new, particularly with its upgraded features like leather upholstery. @Andrew celebrated the car's uniqueness and value for money, while @Watry noted the appealing green leather seats, contributing to the overall positive sentiment regarding the car's presentation.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the car's color and mechanical status, with mixed opinions on its designation as Piper Yellow. @bayareabill requested clarification on the color and suggested checking the color code, while @MeGustaRetro and @marckenyon contributed to the color debate with comparisons to other known shades. @WolfgangJB and @marckenyon raised questions about documentation, including the origin of the receipts, and expressed the need for further information regarding the vehicle's condition and any potential leaks or repairs, indicating some uncertainty regarding important details which could influence bidding decisions.
Negative: There was notable skepticism regarding the seller's integrity due to an alleged falsified receipt linked to prior work on the vehicle. @kstukas and @MCinSD questioned the seller's credibility after the receipt was dismissed as an 'error,' suggesting a possible lack of transparency. Additionally, @Mithril911 noted the suspicious nature of duplicate postings, further fueling concerns about the seller's trustworthiness and the overall authenticity of the transaction. These comments cast a shadow over the otherwise favorable perceptions about the car, raising red flags for potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the Thunderbird as a wonderful and delightful example, expressing enthusiasm with a thumbs up and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Dollycat3 also praised the vehicle, calling it an absolutely beautiful and exceptional long-time family-owned Thunderbird, adding a strong endorsement to its appeal. @birddoc and @thunderbirdsnw offered additional positive remarks, supporting the potential of the car to reach show quality with a bit of detailing and encouraging the new owner to ensure certain parts are operational.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Rich_but_not_wealthy and @ChrisColt, showed enthusiasm for the car while also raising important questions about its condition and history. @ChrisColt detailed numerous inquiries about the original paint, engine work, and overall maintenance, reflecting on the vehicle's patina and condition. @getchasketch (The Seller) provided clarifications about the car's maintenance history, mentioning multiple folders of service records and past repairs that add context to the vehicle's current status, indicating a mix of eagerness and caution among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were expressed by @Scrapit and @Rich_but_not_wealthy regarding the quality of the pictures provided, as they note the lack of detail and the need for more transparency about the vehicle’s condition. @Scrapit pointed out visible issues around the vehicle's VIN plate and requested detailed images of the interior and underside, suggesting potential hidden problems. Similarly, @Rich_but_not_wealthy raised questions about the functionality of the speedometer and the car's overall drivability, expressing skepticism and caution towards the auction process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mr.russky praised the vehicle, noting that it drove well like a regular minivan, and that the interior still looked new even at 260,000 miles. The clever design of the indoor shower and the functional seating arrangement were also highlighted. @frankieballs described the vehicle as a fantastic time capsule in excellent original condition, emphasizing the reliability of the 318ci V8 motor. @jturner fondly recalled his past experience with a similar model, noting its power and suitability for family use, suggesting that it provided a great camping experience.
Neutral: @tintinmilou inquired why the seller was selling the vehicle so soon after purchasing it and requested additional pictures of various interior components. @Edwardo46 asked for clarification on the presence of an Onan generator and the age of the tires, expressing anticipation for updated photos. Meanwhile, @Ruffles (The Seller) responded to numerous queries about the vehicle's condition and features, including the lack of a generator and providing pictures as requested, indicating that the vehicle runs well with only 34,000 original miles.
Negative: Commentators brought up various concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, with @syncrobear noting that the electrical relay box lacked a cover, which could pose a risk to the electrical components, and @KM_AXer mentioning a history of frame issues from battery acid leakage. @Brakey raised concerns about heavy rust on the vehicle's frame, which could affect structural integrity, and several users like @LW57 asked for verification of tire age and codes, reflecting a cautious approach due to potential maintenance issues noted by others.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition and low mileage of just 29,000 miles. @s2000jmcl noted the car's beauty, and @juiced316 praised the owner's documentation, emphasizing the care put into the vehicle's maintenance. @MillerMotoring reminisced about wanting a CRX as a first car, while @FredR32 and @Jimmyblues1959 both acknowledged its desirability, with Jimmyblues mentioning how it's a fantastic representation of a nearly brand new 1989 CRX-Si. Contributions from @Caymanorcarrera and @Aalpha81 reinforced that this car holds special memories and evokes nostalgia for many enthusiasts.
Neutral: The seller, @The_Dude_Abides, introduced himself and provided detailed information about the listing process, documentation, and vehicle status. He explained how he acquired the car from a previous owner who bought it from a listing, maintaining a solid communication line with potential buyers and offering assistance with questions. Several commenters discussed nostalgia related to their own experiences with CRXs, sharing fond memories. @johnjm highlighted the importance of documentation and provenance in collector cars, pointing out the extensive history of the vehicle.
Negative: Despite many positive remarks, there were some concerns raised. @SgtBeavis doubted the feasibility of bidding, comparing this car to a previous one that sold for considerably less. @doublebarrelny and @rallaer expressed confusion regarding the car's history and the apparent discrepancy of cosmetic details despite its well-preserved exterior. Additionally, @darrelljpark pointed out the absence of power windows as strange for a car in this price range. The high expectation of the sale price also raised concerns among some commenters, with @Oreolover jokingly indicating it might approach the price of an NSX.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JeremyG described the vehicle as a "Beautiful Car!" sharing his nostalgic love for a similar model he owned. @BlackhorseLA expressed surprise and admiration for the vehicle, despite his usual disdain for Dodge, calling it a "well kept piece of 90's history". @Dodge_guy was equally enthusiastic, stating this car is akin to a "time machine," emphasizing its place in the pinnacle of Dodge's performance era alongside the Viper. @zembala similarly praised the car, calling it "beautiful and underrated," alongside @njsteve who echoed sentiments of impressive performance and sought service records for his similar model.
Neutral: @excaliburmotorsports (The Seller) provided transparent details regarding the vehicle’s issues, confirming that the A/C works well, although mentioned a boost gauge problem that's being checked by a mechanic. @RR2017 brought up critical questions regarding the instrumentation and functionality of the A/C, to which @excaliburmotorsports provided prompt answers, showcasing openness in communication. @CRUZEN requested to see close-up photos of chips on the roof, revealing their presence while @excaliburmotorsports explained the visibility issue of these blemishes, highlighting a willingness to clarify potential concerns raised by prospective buyers.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the condition and performance of the vehicle. @RichBrit remarked that the tires, while original, might be due for a replacement, indicating a potential issue with safety or performance. @Nadster inquired about the illuminated SR5 light, raising questions about possible electrical or service needs. @poseidon45 cautioned that the boost gauge is unreliable, suggesting a common dissatisfaction with this aspect among past owners, further emphasizing potential maintenance issues that could arise.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a general enthusiasm for the 1958 Porsche 356A Cabriolet. @ColumbiaMotorAlley described it as a "very cool Survivor," indicating that the car holds a nostalgic and historical value. Additionally, the seller, @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, has built a reputation as a trustworthy and knowledgeable establishment that offers transparent communication about the vehicle's condition and history. The seller encourages potential buyers to engage in discussion, providing reassurance that they will be available for questions and inspections.
Neutral: Several comments emphasize the car's condition, mentioning that while it has surface rust, the floor pans and structure appear solid. @zeres noted the potential for the car's restoration, affirming that the present surface rust can be addressed. Both @WolfandMare and @openvalve acknowledged the replacement of the floor pans, sharing their expertise on typical restoration practices for these classic cars. The seller, @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, confirmed this, enhancing the transparency of the vehicle's history and inviting potential buyers to inspect it personally.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, there are concerns noted about the vehicle's condition. @356dax pointed out that while the exterior looks lovely, some areas, specifically the bottom and closing panels, need attention. @zeres brought attention to the rust under the vehicle, attributing it to road salt from its past, and expressed concern over the potential for deeper issues. @Yellowboatscars inquired about the car's registration status, raising questions about how the non-operation status in California could affect a buyer from another state, which highlights potential complications in the purchasing process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2001 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet, offered by @1600veloce, has garnered positive comments for its stunning condition and low mileage of 15,000 miles. Commenters like @Thom21as believe that such a well-maintained vehicle would attract collectors, and @kars4u refers to it as a wonderful 'barn find'. Many fans appreciate the attention to detail from the seller, who is deeply involved in the auction process and communicates openly about the car's features and condition. The seller emphasizes their commitment to quality, showcasing their dedicated service facilities and detailing shop.
Neutral: Some discussions have revolved around the technical aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding the IMS bearing, with commenters like @Fargie expressing concern about the implications of low mileage when it comes to potential problems. @GasWerks requested clarification on the condition of the central digital display, which also highlights the ongoing dialogue about the car's overall technology. @pjbart asked specifically about the possibility of an IMS bearing replacement, showing varied levels of concern among potential buyers about the car's long-term reliability, especially given its age and mechanical specifics.
Negative: On the negative side, concerns about the vehicle's IMS bearing have surfaced, as seen in comments from @Fargie and @pjbart, who point out the risks associated with owning a 996 from this period. @The_professor mentioned disappointment regarding the absence of a third pedal, which might deter some purists. Additionally, the issue of the central digital display being damaged has raised questions, with @Zivab looking for more clarification. The comments reflect a skepticism regarding the car's low mileage, with some users indicating it may not be as beneficial as it seems, potentially leading to a mixed sentiment about its investment value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the positive aspects of the vehicle, with @IMK67 expressing admiration for the bike's beauty and acknowledging it as a piece of history. @d1d2h1 reminisces about their own positive experience owning a similar model, emphasizing the enjoyment of riding the motorcycle in twisty conditions. @2hecknback praises the motorcycle for its brilliant engineering and how it enhances the riding experience, suggesting it lives up to its iconic status. Furthermore, @noneal01 conveys appreciation for the bike's heritage, noting its previous ownership by a passionate collector which adds to its value.
Neutral: There are several informative contributions regarding the model specifics and mechanical aspects of the motorcycle. @allwheels provides insight into the VIN system, helping to identify the bike's model year, while @Johnmccoyitaly shares his experience selling these models in the past without any reported issues. @Jhnydngrus mentions the availability of replacement parts for items that may deteriorate over time, such as turn signals, which shows there are solutions for maintaining the bike. Overall, the comments offer a blend of nostalgia and technical advice.
Negative: Some comments bring to light potential concerns associated with the bike’s age. @Johnmccoyitaly warns about the fragility of Italian turn signals that can become brittle, requiring consideration for replacements. The suggestion to search for original parts or adapt similar items implies that maintaining the motorcycle may require effort and investment. Although these are practical concerns, they do not seem to detract significantly from the overall positive reception of the bike.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MuddyRiver appreciates the aesthetic appeal of the truck, calling it a nice looking vehicle. @AHockaday (The Seller) mentions that all electronics and buttons are functioning properly and highlights that the air ride and compressor are in excellent condition. The seller also emphasizes the cleanliness of the undercarriage, which a technician noted is rare for a truck of its age, reinforcing its good upkeep.
Neutral: @BudHorse inquires about the condition of the electronics and ride system, indicating a need for reassurance about the reliability of these components, especially given the cost of replacements. @Daveco shares that the model does have the AFM system and provides insight about maintenance for better reliability. @Randym1100 raises questions about the status of the title and whether the truck has ever been smoked in, showing interest in the truck's history and condition, which @AHockaday confirms.
Negative: @Randym1100 expresses concern over why the truck is being sold so soon after purchase, questioning if @AHockaday (The Seller) is a dealer. These inquiries could suggest skepticism about the seller's intent or the truck's reliability. @Daveco notes that the biggest potential expense might be related to suspension components, implying that while the truck seems good, there could be underlying issues that future owners might face.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @raynekat expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, indicating a high level of interest. @BDAS (The Seller) highlighted the impressive specifications of the 2020 Porsche Macan GTS, featuring stunning aesthetics in Mamba Green Metallic with numerous desirable options including PTV+, Sport Chrono Package, and adaptive sports seats. The seller notes that the car is enthusiast-owned, accident-free, and maintained in excellent condition with services up to date, including new rotors, pads, and tires, demonstrating high maintenance standards and overall quality.
Neutral: The comments from @Reid and @charron98 deal with practical details surrounding the vehicle's maintenance history and specifications. @Reid inquired about the service history regarding spark plugs and PDK service intervals, while @charron98 raised questions about tire conditions and potential warranty status. @BDAS responded thoroughly, providing the last service dates and reassuring the community about the vehicle's condition and maintenance, contributing to the image of a well-cared-for automobile.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding tire replacements, with @bvd questioning if frequent tire replacements are common for this model and @charron98 commenting on the past tire replacements which raise questions about the current tire condition. @VKAS asked about any issues with the transfer case, indicating a wariness about potential mechanical problems. Overall, while the vehicle appears to have been well maintained, the frequency of tire changes may cause some apprehension among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance, with @ratpack1968 complimenting it as a "nice car" and wishing luck to the seller, @JayBomar. @440belvedere called it a "Nice '67!" which reinforces the general appreciation for its aesthetic appeal. Additionally, @mcj4250 shared a personal anecdote that tied into maintaining a good relationship by accommodating his spouse's car needs, reflecting positively on the seller's situation and creating a supportive community around the hobby.
Neutral: The seller, @JayBomar, provided clarity on various inquiries about the vehicle, such as the garage space issue prompting the sale, without indicating dissatisfaction with the car itself. He confirmed the car fits in the garage but has been underused due to family commitments, stating plans for potential replacement with a different model. He also addressed technical questions, updating engine details and acknowledging the need for improvements, like working gauges, while noting concerns about previously reported rust issues.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's condition, particularly related to rust. @Reidcycles specifically asked for more details about a rust hole, while @pghpainter questioned the credibility of the seller's earlier claims about not seeing the rust during inspection. @ronsant pointed out that several items seemed to have been left undone, such as the fuel gauge and turn signals, which could lead to a substantial 'punch list' for the next owner. This raised skepticism about the overall care and finishing of the vehicle, overshadowing its initial appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commentors praised the features and condition of the vehicle. @Lunsey highlighted the Panoramic Glass Sunroof and adaptive Xenon headlights, emphasizing their appeal for a 20-year-old car and the upgraded leather sports seats with lumbar support as noteworthy upgrades. @ExIBMer appreciated the vehicle's cleanliness and mentioned that a friend who knows the owner—who is a mechanic—has taken good care of the car. @Thisisformyhusband found the wheel and tire choice appealing, suggesting overall positive driving experiences with the car.
Neutral: Several comments raised inquiries about the vehicle’s mechanical history and condition. @Evergreen87, a former E61 owner, asked about major repairs related to critical components like the radiator and water pump, expressing interest since they had experienced certain issues in their own E61. @KevinW. inquired about the roof paint and the hatch functionality, indicating there might be concerns but seeking clarification rather than making outright judgments. @Stretch_XI (The Seller) was proactive in addressing these questions by promising to provide service history and additional photos to clear up any uncertainties.
Negative: Some commentors pointed out areas of concern regarding the vehicle's condition. @Boondocksaint requested closer images of rust around the tail hatch, indicating potential deterioration. @KevinW. noted the unusual appearance of the roof paint and questioned the hatch's functionality, raising flags about possible underlying issues. @Evergreen87 also expressed concern over water accumulation risks based on their previous experiences, suggesting that water management might be a worry for this model as well.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Racejord105 provides detailed insights into the truck's features, mentioning that it is a solid work truck platform equipped with functioning A/C and heat, having been serviced recently. The truck is acknowledged for having several factory ordered options, including an exhaust brake and automatic power windows. The seller also offers assistance with shipping arrangements, highlighting a customer-friendly approach.
Neutral: @JimAdcock inquires about the presence of a gooseneck hitch, to which @Racejord105 responds that while there isn't a gooseneck hitch in the bed, there is a pintle and a 2-5/16 ball on the rear hitch plate. @Firewuud asks about the purpose of various switches on the console, the fuel tank size, and the dimensions for potential gooseneck hauling, to which @Racejord105 replies with specific measurements and explains that the switches are no longer used but were originally intended for other features.
Negative: The absence of a gooseneck hitch might be a disappointment for some potential buyers who need that specific feature for their hauling purposes. Additionally, the comment from @Firewuud about seeking detailed dimensions and specifications reveals some concerns regarding the truck's configurations relative to custom needs, highlighting that it may not fully meet every buyer's requirements.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Allen_Stephens provides a wealth of details about the 1972 Mercedes-Benz 250C, emphasizing its good mechanical condition and maintenance history. Commenters like @bondgraham and @Ab150 echo this sentiment, mentioning the car's handling and driveability, with @Ab150 even citing an enjoyable recent long drive with their own similar vehicle. Several users appreciate the honest presentation, and @zembala notes that the car is in wonderful condition compared to other vintage models, highlighting the dash's lack of cracks and overall presentation.
Neutral: @New2Porsche raises valid concerns about wanting the original hubs repainted and inquires about the car's roadworthiness for a long drive, to which @Allen_Stephens responds thoughtfully. @Marlene12 asks about potential rust issues, prompting Allen to clarify the condition of the floor pans and battery tray, which are rust-free. Other commenters like @BerndV inquire about sounds while driving and previous water leaks, indicating a moderate level of concern about mechanical integrity, but @Allen_Stephens reassures them by being open about the car's past and addressing these issues before viewing.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the car's past paint job and the potential for issues due to its age. @KQQ59 criticizes the Earl Scheib paint which was done in 2001, suggesting that the car might need a correct paint job in the future. Meanwhile, @zembala mentions issues like bubbling in the paint and a buzzing sound during the drive, indicating mechanical concerns that need to be addressed. Another user, @Craterguard, recounts previous problems with engine idle and other issues common in older models, emphasizing the importance of thorough inspection before any long drives.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments praise the Audi RS4 for its performance, including a powerful V8 growl and an engaging driving experience, particularly with the Capristo exhaust modification mentioned by @SmallDogMotorsports. The vehicle is described as a dream car, with @DUGEEEFRESH04 and @Lonely_Driver highlighting the tempting maintenance done, which includes around $20,000 invested during previous ownership. The documentation of its service history and the credibility of the seller, @p1_motorcars_ltd, is also consistently mentioned, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's upkeep.
Neutral: A few comments express curiosity about the car's pricing and specifics, such as reserve price inquiries from @morbo3000 and feature questions by @RobertRS4 regarding the missing navigation system in this particular model. Comments from various users indicate there is an interest in the car's features, service history, and potential modifications, while @roohark raises specific technical queries about leather condition and potential DRC issues, which have been acknowledged and addressed by the seller.
Negative: Some comments reveal concerns about the vehicle availability and its rapid resale after a short ownership, as noted by @Lonely_Driver and @roohark. Inquiries about the car's condition, including signs of wear or modifications, suggest a cautious attitude among potential buyers. The mention of delamination on the door panel by @p1_motorcars_ltd may raise red flags about the car's overall condition, which potential buyers will want to consider before bidding.
![]() |
Twin-Turbocharged, 11k-Mile 2013 Ford Mustang GT California Special Coupe
1ZVBP8CF0D5246488
Lot 237987
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @lotusfarm described the vehicle as very beautiful, suggesting that it would bring a big smile to the owner's face. @79bronc (The Seller) expressed excitement about the car, indicating that it's a blast to drive and noting his extensive experience with Mustangs. He reassured potential buyers that the car has been well cared for, never driven in inclement weather, and stored in a heated garage during winter months, showcasing its good condition and the owner's commitment to maintaining it.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions for clarification on mechanical aspects of the car. @Inthehighdesert inquired about the sourcing of the long block and the tuning process. @deere also asked about the origins of the long block, seeking confirmation that it was a factory remanufactured part from Ford rather than an aftermarket replacement. @79bronc (The Seller) provided detailed information on the long block, tuning, and modifications made to enhance the vehicle's performance, showing a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: @deere questioned the reason for replacing the long block, raising concerns about potential failures in the original engine and whether that would deter buyers. @79bronc (The Seller) explained that the replacement was due to a combination of issues experienced at the track, which led to a lean condition and eventual failure. This exchange may raise red flags for some buyers regarding the vehicle's reliability, though the seller did provide thorough explanations to address these concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Big_DaddyRL described the vehicle simply as 'Godzilla!', echoing the nickname associated with the GT-R models, while @gumby74 pointed out that videos in portrait mode don't do this car justice and wished good luck with the auction. @boaboyoz praised the car as a 'wicked white GT-R' and a 'killer build', showing enthusiasm for the vehicle. @Fredzilla called it a 'beautiful car' and appreciated the choice of extras, while @Tt2323 and @Vremacs-BAT also complimented its looks, with Vremacs-BAT stating it as a 'great looking car'. Many comments express admiration for the car's color, body kit, and overall aesthetics, indicating a high level of enthusiasm within the community.
Neutral: The seller, @coleao, provided detailed responses to potential buyers, clarifying the body kit's brand to @kamikaziH2Omln and confirming the functionality of the climate control system to @Vremacs-BAT. When a question arose about rust from @RjStone, @coleao stated there has been no rust repair during his ownership and no evidence of any repair by the original owner, indicating that while there is some rust, it was not detrimental. @jza80 inquired about the original rear wing center section, to which @coleao confirmed it would be included, stressing his willingness to address questions from interested buyers.
Negative: While many comments were positive, some users, particularly @RjStone, raised concerns about the vehicle's condition regarding rust, leading to a tense exchange with @coleao. @RjStone requested further clarification on whether there is any rust, suggesting a lack of transparency that could deter potential buyers. Additionally, comments from @sharky51 indicated issues with communication over Instagram, which could lead to potential misunderstandings or frustrations for buyers trying to arrange in-person inspections, signifying some operational hurdles in the selling process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and mechanical upgrades. @craZee praised the color combination, while @otoupalik highlighted the appealing wheels and seats. @ADenton showed excitement for the Recaro seats, mentioning they have long been on their bucket list. Additionally, @Lordbobbington found the car to be a superbly clean example and loved the interior, indicating a general enthusiasm for the car's condition and modifications.
Neutral: The seller, @Bobert_Simons, provided detailed responses about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance history. Significant components such as coilovers, rod bearings, and subframe reinforcements were mentioned, along with upgrades like the head unit and audio system. However, there were inquiries regarding documentation for previous work, like the Big 3, and the seller is actively working on gathering information and photographs to satisfy potential buyers' requests.
Negative: Some comments reflected disappointment regarding the quality of the photos provided, as noted by @MyWifeWillBeMad, who mentioned receiving better images from another listing. @Bmchace and @rennengruppe raised concerns about the lack of transparency regarding maintenance receipts and engine work, while @DrivenDevelopment requested additional details about rod bearings and Vanos work, revealing some skepticism among potential buyers. Overall, while excitement was evident, there were noteworthy concerns about documentation and clarity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Marco-426 loves their ML-350 2015 model, which has 109,000 miles and is still performing well. They express interest in the condition of the driver side door hinges, indicating that they have experience with the ML series. This shows a level of trust in the model's durability and reliability. Additionally, @CommMotor2 states that the vehicle was previously used as an executive chauffeur vehicle, which can suggest that it has been well maintained.
Neutral: @rwharriskc asks for clarification regarding any hidden blemishes or defects on the vehicle, particularly about the passenger side's paint color and the condition of the wheels and tires. They appreciate the photos but feel that further information would help potential buyers gauge the car's condition better. @markbschick inquires whether the vehicle features Distronic or Distronic Plus, while @jOHNNIEd mentions that according to the build card, the car lacks adaptive cruise control, providing specific details about its equipment.
Negative: @CommMotor2 acknowledges some blemishes that are visible in the gallery, including prior refinishing on the passenger-side front fender and a ding on the left rear bumper cover. Additionally, @rwharriskc raises concerns about smoke or odors in the vehicle, though @CommMotor2 assures that there is no odor or smoke scent present. The seller also provides documentation that might cause concern over the vehicle's true mileage, indicating potential discrepancies that buyers should be aware of.
![]() |
2021 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500 Midwest Automotive Designs Ultimate 144 Commuter
W1X4EBHYXMT070103
Lot 237815
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: The 2023 Ultimate Toys conversion of the 2021 Mercedes chassis is described as very lightly used and in wonderful condition, according to @sweetcars (The Seller). The vehicle has been prepared for sale with minor issues addressed, including fixing a fog light and securing a fuse panel, ensuring it is ready for its new owner. The seller also offers assistance with shipping arrangements within the US and provides options for transportation from the Fort Wayne International Airport, reflecting a customer-oriented service.
Neutral: Several potential buyers, including @JohninruralNM and @MooreBuysIt, have asked specific questions about the vehicle's specifications, such as water and waste tank volumes and AC operation. @sweetcars (The Seller) has promptly provided accurate answers, confirming that the overall length is 19'8" and clarifying that the AC cannot run off the generator as this unit does not have one. The seller's engagement in answering buyer inquiries indicates a transparent and informative sales process.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters such as @Dvanse, who expressed dissatisfaction with the rear suspension, sharing that their past experience with a Midwest 144" Sprinter led to discomfort for rear passengers. @Dvanse emphasized the importance of a more comfortable ride, suggesting past vehicles offered better rear passenger experience compared to the stock suspension of this model. This indicates a potential issue that some buyers might find concerning regarding passenger comfort in the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters praised the car, noting that the Cashmere color is the best combination and that it is a beautiful model. @tabutler3 expressed admiration for the aesthetic and remarked on the quality of the car, while @Sunbird77 shared their positive experience with a similar car, observing that the engine performs well at higher mileage. @EnduroX530 (The Seller) also highlighted the car's well-cared-for status, emphasizing family history and the emotional connection he has with the vehicle, recalling trips it made in California.
Neutral: Communication between commenters and @EnduroX530 (The Seller) indicates interest in the vehicle but seeks clarification on specific concerns. @gocorcoran pointed out the distinction between 'original family' and 'original owner' regarding the Carfax report. Commenters like @cruisemissile and @oozle asked about the car's interior condition, focusing particularly on potential issues with the dash and A/C system, while others inquired about tire age and the presence of any warning lights during driving.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition emerged from some comments, with @BobWheeler noting that while the car looks good, it has high mileage and will need some repairs, particularly to the suspension. @WesTxStoner cautioned @EnduroX530 (The Seller) about the potentially unsafe condition of the spare tire, suggesting it be deflated due to age and recalls, indicating safety concerns for potential buyers. These comments reflect a sense of caution regarding the vehicle's maintenance and practical use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its clean appearance and originality. @HtownP noted its aesthetic appeal by stating, "Damn that’s clean," while @will13k7 described it as a "Beautiful survivor example." @Karl_M shared a positive personal experience with a similar model, emphasizing the car's fun, reliable, and practical nature. @91crxtacy remarked on the rarity of the car's history in California, underscoring its likely garage-kept quality and calling it a "Beautiful OEM example." Overall, several fans expressed a nostalgic fondness for the model, making clear their admiration for its lasting appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @bdesr32, acknowledged the car's condition and history, indicating that while it has been outside for a significant period, it presents itself well and remains unmodified. They also provided transparency about the vehicle's paint wear and offered to assist potential buyers with further inquiries to bolster confidence in bidding. Some users requested additional details such as smog certification and service records, which @bdesr32 addressed, giving insights into the car's maintenance status without being overly detailed or negative.
Negative: On the downside, @Mellowd719 expressed concerns about the potential for theft, recounting personal experiences with two similar vehicles being stolen and indicating a strong emotional response when considering parking the car outside. This introspection hints at the underlying anxiety prospective buyers may feel regarding the security of such prized vehicles. Additionally, the seller mentioned certain imperfections, including uneven paint and localized rust, which could deter some bidders looking for a flawless car. The reality of wear after years of outdoor storage was noted, attracting mixed reactions from those valuing pristine condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @KirkDub described the vehicle as a "Beautiful F-150" that fulfills all his preferences, especially noting its location in Washington. He expressed a desire to bid on it if he weren't preparing to list his own vehicle soon. @CSmith1142 and @Schwint11 both praised the truck's aesthetic, with @Schwint11 highlighting the timeless color and factory Alcoa wheels. @acopping appreciated the truck's stance with its 33" tires, while @Todd_Z. also commended its excellent stance and mentioned the +10 points for the manual shift transfer case.
Neutral: The seller, @nkuhnhenn, actively engaged with potential buyers by offering to provide videos of the vehicle and addressing their inquiries. He mentioned that both fuel tanks were functional, although the front tank gauge reads empty. Responding to a question from @CKELT88, he confirmed that everything works properly, including the AC and cruise control, aside from the fuel gauge issue which could be a bad switch. Regarding the roof's appearance near the 3rd brake light, he believed it might have just been a shadow in the pictures.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @DERB405 regarding potential oil or fluid leaks, to which @nkuhnhenn replied that he believes the oil pan may be leaking. @hatrick2112 inquired about the truck's four-wheel drive functionality and transmission sloppiness, with @nkuhnhenn assuring that both were working well without any issues. @CKELT88 also pointed out a possible large dent on the roof, but @nkuhnhenn suggested it appeared to be a shadow and would check further.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle received praise for its cleanliness and overall preservation. @JGraham and @Cincinnati335i highlighted its features, such as the 6-speed manual transmission, heated seats, and low mileage relative to its age, noting that the undercarriage looks as if it has significantly fewer miles than it does. @Zac-H expressed excitement about finding a car that matches the specifications he was looking for, mentioning the impressive condition of the undercarriage as well. Overall, there is a strong sense of enthusiasm among commenters regarding the vehicle's condition and rarity.
Neutral: Comments reveal a mix of curiosity and interest in the vehicle's details. @Andrewsm inquired about the title and registration status, while @KT1967 asked whether the suspension setup is stock. Some comments sought clarification on interior modifications or features, such as @KevinW's question about any visible paintwork in the interior or potential replacement of parts like the engine splash shield. @GaDeluxeMotors (The Seller) addressed these inquiries, providing details about the vehicle's history and condition, fostering confidence among potential buyers.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised about potential imperfections. @JGraham noted minor paint flaws that could be seen up close, while @KevinW brought attention to possible repainting in the interior, questioning if other parts had undergone similar treatments. However, @GaDeluxeMotors responded to these concerns by confirming the specific areas where touch-ups had occurred and assuring the rigidity of the suspended components. Overall, while there are minor concerns, the responses from the seller were aimed at reassuring the audience about the vehicle's integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle, a historic Honda Type R - IMSA winning race car, has generated excitement among potential buyers, as expressed by @PrecisionRacingLA, who noted their eagerness to answer questions and provide detailed information about the car's history as the final auction approaches. The enthusiasm from the seller is palpable, as they highlight the vehicle's performance, including recent podium finishes and a robust engine with minimal power degradation, showcasing the car's readiness for racing. The community engagement is strong, with @CKKurtz pointing out the positive indication of four bids before any comments, which suggests a high level of interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries from potential bidders reflect a keen interest in understanding the car's technical details. @Steve_D raises a question regarding the kilometer listing, prompting a correction from @bringatrailer, showcasing the active involvement of community members in the listing process. Other bidders, including @Jtremols and @Wanker, seek clarification on specifics such as repairs done to the car, compression tests for the engine, and corner weight information, demonstrating a focus on the car's performance and service history without overt mistrust or enthusiasm.
Negative: Despite the overall positive vibe, some comments indicate concerns about the vehicle's previous repairs, with @Upshift4 questioning the replacement of major components like the bumper and fender, possibly hinting at underlying issues from past racing incidents. Additionally, bidders like @Jtremols are specifically demanding inspection data such as compression tests and dyno sheets, which could be perceived as a lack of confidence in the car's condition. This suggests that while there is interest, potential buyers are cautious and seeking assurance regarding the integrity and history of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Goldbondh2o expresses excitement, calling it "ONE SWEET RIDE!", while @Hywyflyr compliments the modifications, noting the engine's history and its availability in other markets. The seller, @73bus, shares a personal connection with the vehicle, mentioning a previous car experience and emphasizing its appeal and performance. They describe the bus as running exceptionally well, having plenty of power for various driving conditions.
Neutral: @Hywyflyr raises an interesting point regarding the engine specifications, highlighting potential discrepancies in the listing's details about the motor type. @RichardMcC also points out a similar confusion about the engine description and praises the seller for updating the listing based on community feedback. Furthermore, @BrianS inquires about possible rust on a specific area of the bus and requests additional media for better assessment, reflecting general curiosity and engagement with the listing.
Negative: @MikeJFlat questions whether the vehicle is German or Brazilian, which could imply concerns about the bus's origin and authenticity. @BrianS's inquiry about rust raises potential concerns about the bus's condition, while @VWTony comments on the power of the engine, suggesting that it might be underpowered for a bus. These comments hint at skepticism regarding certain aspects of the bus and the need for transparency about its status.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its desirability and aesthetic appeal. @PulseCheck noted the rarity of the manual .2 Turbo, mentioning its beauty and potential as a tempting option. @milpool2000 shared a firsthand account of seeing the Platinum Silver Metallic paint in sunlight, describing it as much more striking than typical silver, and praised the car's performance. Overall, commenters were enthusiastic about the car's looks and specifications, with several affirming that the new owner would be getting a fantastic example of a 997.2 Turbo.
Neutral: Several comments highlighted specifics regarding the car's features and its history. @GaryRoach (The Seller) addressed inquiries about the car's modifications, confirming the presence of desired options and detailing the aftermarket exhaust system. He also discussed the car's design improvements over previous models, such as the relocation of coolant lines and direct fuel injection. @jrosenbloom2 and @Tomvg74 mentioned the rarity of manual transmissions in convertible versions, providing production numbers which added context to the car's market value.
Negative: A few remarks pointed out concerns, primarily related to the vehicle's options and the history of its bumper repaint. @thefleshrocket remarked on the sparse options of the Turbo compared to earlier models, questioning if anyone would miss the omitted features. Additionally, @Luftwaffe commented on how the minor bumper repaint may challenge perceptions of the vehicle, suggesting a discrepancy in how such repairs are regarded. Meanwhile, @TonyZH raised questions about the seller's selling practices on BaT, implying a potential bias in pricing or market expectations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express appreciation for the vehicle's specifications and features. @bhoffma1 highlights the manual transmission and low mileage, calling it the 'single car solution,' while @slegg2008 notes that the car is an excellent daily driver. @aalexorr acknowledges the quality of the car, even though they have a personal preference regarding the absence of a heads-up display (HUD), stating that it is a great car otherwise. Additionally, @GRCDUDE mentions that it is a rare base model, indicating its uniqueness.
Neutral: There are some inquiries about the vehicle that suggest a level of ambiguity or something that needs clarification. @Sandhewitt asks if the break-in fluid change was completed at a specific mileage, which suggests an interest in the maintenance history of the car. @67numberfive, the seller, confirms that it was indeed done at 1355 miles and shares information about the car's options, along with an invitation for potential buyers to view the vehicle. This indicates that the seller is open and available to communicate with potential customers.
Negative: While the overall tone is generally positive, one comment hints at a drawback for some buyers. @aalexorr points out the absence of a HUD, stating it is now a mandatory feature for all their future cars. This reveals a potential limitation for those who prioritize such technology in their vehicles. However, this concern does not seem to overshadow the vehicle's appeal to the majority of commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters praise the vehicle, particularly its aesthetic appeal and rarity. @notlikelytowin4 highlights the success of a previous auction, while @Collectibleclassics expresses enthusiasm for the auction event. @Shtuttghart and @Norgeiron engage in a debate about the looks of different models, with @Norgeiron advocating for the 3.0 over the M Coupe. @JGraham, an experienced Z3 Coupe owner, emphasizes the car's uniqueness and design, calling it one of BMW's coolest vehicles, and appreciates the low mileage and specific features of the example being sold.
Neutral: Several questions regarding the vehicle's service history and condition arise from potential buyers. @booker82 inquires about specific maintenance metrics such as the age of the tires and the last oil change. @CharlesBernard and @Bob_MX5 both ask about significant services performed on the fuel or cooling systems, and @Bob_MX5 requests additional pictures of the undercarriage for assessment purposes. @SennaD, the seller, responds to these inquiries with information about the car's servicing history, including various maintenance records and the condition of the tires.
Negative: Some comments suggest concern regarding the vehicle's maintenance and servicing, particularly around the tire age and service records. @Bob_MX5 expresses skepticism about the original tires and requests confirmation on the tire date codes. He also notes the lack of previous major services on critical systems, which raises a red flag for potential buyers. @CharlesBernard's inquiries about trunk welds indicate a concern for the car's structural integrity, while @MdistelBMW and @JGraham initially misunderstand some of the seat features, hinting at mixed communications among the commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @WinniBenz highlighted that the vehicle looks really clean and has the right options, indicating it should perform well in the market. @Blesseuer praised the manual transmission and center rear exhaust as a great combination. Seller @TurboBoBo mentioned that this is one of the nicest cars they've owned and expressed confidence in its appeal, suggesting that potential buyers are looking at a quality vehicle.
Neutral: Comments by @CanadianCamaro provided insights into certain vehicle modifications, pointing out that the lower grill cover was not an original factory piece but was available from the dealer or SLP. Others like @Motor_Fast and @bdh9898 added that the grille was a factory option through SLP, helping clarify the vehicle's authentic features. The discussions included questions about the availability of original parts and documents, indicating that buyers are interested in how much of the original specification is intact.
Negative: Some negativity was present in comments concerning modifications, as @CanadianCamaro noted that certain parts, like the muffler and shift knob, had been swapped out, raising questions about authenticity. Requests for additional information regarding original parts and documentation from @Jak3501 and @RaiderSmiley highlighted concerns about the vehicle's completeness. Additionally, there were inquiries about the condition of specific elements like the sail panel and whether original spare parts were still available, reflecting a cautious approach from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hooper82 (The Seller) describes the truck as an amazing vehicle that runs and drives exceptionally well, highlighting features such as a cold air conditioning system, smooth driving at highway speeds, and overall functionality. The seller emphasizes that the interiors and functionalities all work as they should, including windows, gauges, and locks. Acknowledging the truck's low mileage and clean Carfax, @Hooper82 expresses a fondness for this first-gen model, describing it as a pleasure to drive with original glass and new components like tires and shocks.
Neutral: @TripodXL raises questions about the truck's rear bumper, which appears to have a slight twist, and inquires about the bed liner—whether it is a spray-in or a lay-in. Their comments also reflect a desire to see under the bed liner. Meanwhile, @ACCampbell and @AJB86 also contribute inquiries, one about time zones and the other requesting a video of the truck starting and idling, showing interest but not providing specific feedback on the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @Markjr expresses concern about the bed being badly dented, indicating that there might be potential issues with the truck's exterior or past mishandling. @TripodXL also insinuates a lack of thoroughness in the initial assessment of the bed liner, which could imply some confusion or miscommunication regarding the truck's condition. Overall, these comments hint at uncertainties regarding the truck's perceived aesthetic flaws, despite the seller's insistence on the vehicle's overall quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @bua19 stating love for the car and @JeremyG (The Seller) explaining the labor that went into building it, noting its exceptional handling and sound. @lizardbait1 echoed this enthusiasm, calling it a tempting build and appreciating its aesthetic. @PulseCheck remarked that this is how the C4 should have been built from the factory, while @TimothyAllen009 highlighted it as one of the coolest Corvettes, indicating strong interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several users provided inquiries and technical comments about the car's features and performance. @ILikePi inquired about the handling and potential improvements needed for harness bars and seat adjustments. @MrC questioned the vehicle's autocross experience, while @carhillclimb discussed specific options related to the car's original configuration. @jeremyG responded thoughtfully to these queries, providing insights into the vehicle's specifications and capabilities, creating a dialog around its use and racing potential.
Negative: A few comments pointed out concerns and questions regarding the vehicle's title and mechanics. @lotzacars mentioned the 'exceeded limits' branding on the title, which intrigued some. @jeremyG (The Seller) also shared some light-hearted concerns about wiring issues with lights, indicating that while the lights are brand new, they need to be wired correctly. Additionally, there were humorous comments about how the car garners attention at gas stations, highlighting the blend of admiration and practical drawbacks of owning such a unique vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the 2009 Porsche Cayenne Turbo S for its power and unique features. @PulseCheck remarked on the impressive 550hp, describing it as a 'beast' and a great vehicle for families. @Mak appreciated the Basalt color for its depth and modern feel, believing the car could become a classic. Additionally, @ALM01 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating a desire to try one out soon.
Neutral: A number of inquiries and clarifications were made regarding the car's specifications and condition, with @jamestielsch asking about potential transfer case concerns and heated steering wheel functionality, while @FHaluska sought details on the brakes, air suspension, and tire age. @Descanuck questioned whether a bore scoring inspection was performed, and @TexasCollector asked about the sunroof and key availability. The seller, @aegmotorsports, provided clear responses, confirming the car's features and answering maintenance questions.
Negative: Some concerns were voiced about the vehicle's previous service history. @kylebrightman and @FHaluska pointed out issues such as tires being mounted incorrectly and the absence of one lug nut per wheel. Each of these might raise red flags for potential buyers. @Bavarianchops and @TangerineDream discussed bore scoring fears, suggesting a pre-purchase inspection (PPI) might be wise, especially given the high mileage on this model.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and condition. @Barryward mentioned that he would be lying if he didn't like the car, while @Beachbum86 described it as a 'beautiful example in the fastest color,' indicating that it has been well-preserved with garage keeping evident in the lack of faded emblems and pristine wheels. @grb1 echoed similar sentiments by complimenting the low mileage and stunning graphite metallic finish, displaying an overall excitement toward the car's appeal.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle's features and specifications were made by several commenters, reflecting a desire for more information rather than dissatisfaction. @Thesunisrising asked for a video of the convertible top operation and clarification on the spoiler's functionality, to which @LUX-AUTO (The Seller) confirmed that it works as designed and provided video evidence. Additionally, @ptochman inquired about the tire date codes which @LUX-AUTO promptly answered, indicating that the conversation also included practical details about the car's upkeep and maintenance.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle itself; however, the inquiries by @Thesunisrising about the title and the wish expressed by @Iinuout regarding the rarity of the model reflect some concerns about ownership clarity and demand. While these comments may not express dissatisfaction, they highlight the importance of verification in transactions that involve collectible cars, suggesting that potential buyers should approach with careful scrutiny.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its stunning beauty and meticulous restoration, with @Hwfuchs640 calling it "Absolutely stunning." @Badmechanic1956 remarked on the near perfection in the car's details and @Racing_Unlimited appreciated its unique features such as the Buick exclusive aluminum front brake drums. Multiple individuals, including @Dano3500 and @cjp69, noted that seeing the car in person only enhanced its appeal, with several stating it was one of the best examples of a '69 Stage 1 they had ever encountered. @Vinipizzetta, after seeing the car at a show, described it as "stunning" and encouraged others to appreciate its quality, while @Tri-Shield highlighted that it was a rare opportunity to purchase such a detailed vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @GSXtra, provided a detailed history of the car's background, explaining its rarity and past ownership. This included the original manufacturing details and the car's journey through various owners who contributed to its preservation. The seller also addressed specific inquiries about the car's restoration, confirming that it maintained all original sheet metal with no rust, and detailed the extensive work put into preserving every part, such as the original equipment, which added to the car's credibility. Comments like those from @Joztotz and @Sigma76 expressed curiosity about the restoration details, showing a general interest in the vehicle's condition and history.
Negative: A few comments hinted at a sense of regret among past owners or bidders who felt they had missed past opportunities to own similar models. @kellvette shared a nostalgic regret about selling their own '69 GS400 Stage 1, expressing doubt about affording the current high prices. @wannabid55's concern about the manual brakes suggested that some commenters were apprehensive about the car's drivability, especially for those who may struggle with heavier vehicles. Such reservations contrasted sharply with the overall admiration for the car, highlighting a few potential barriers for interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with many commenters praising its stunning condition and low mileage of 18,000, which many consider remarkable. @PEYKAN11 remarked, "Stunning!" while @Jive expressed a passionate desire to bid, predicting that this rare W123 could set a record price. Others noted the superb work done by @WoodsAndBarclay, with comments suggesting that this car represents one of the best examples available and is comparable to a time machine, as mentioned by @Cotullaguy. The vehicle's cosmetic details, including its rare Smoke Silver and black interior, have been highlighted as a standout feature, making it highly desirable among Mercedes-Benz enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some neutral comments focused on the car's history and the reasons for its sale. @UncleFred1 pointed out that this is an unusual opportunity given that most of the cars associated with @WoodsAndBarclay do not typically reappear on the market quickly. @Avvocato requested additional documentation regarding the car’s mileage to clarify some inconsistencies that appeared on a CarFax report. Additionally, while many were entranced by the vehicle's condition, some raised questions about specific details, like the presence of two sets of Bundt wheels, which @Narikin found confusing, and the implications of a 'refurbished' engine as mentioned by @plemare.
Negative: There were a few concerns surrounding the sale, particularly regarding the car's unexpected turnover after being in the hands of its original family for decades. @UncleFred1 expressed skepticism about why the car is being sold so soon after being refurbished, emphasizing the need for transparency regarding its history. @Avvocato requested an explanation for the mileage discrepancies noted in the CarFax report, highlighting a need for assurance regarding the vehicle's actual condition and usage. These discussions hint at a potential apprehension about the vehicle's provenance, despite the overwhelmingly positive sentiment overall.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @702e30girl praised the vehicle for its futuristic styling despite being a 1991 model, stating it's the coolest thing they will see today. @David_P called it the best wagon on BaT, indicating strong enthusiasm for the vehicle. @TimUrs6Avant commented on its aesthetics and suggested putting back the original BBS wheels, reflecting a sense of nostalgia for its design. Additionally, @ImOldGreg shared his positive experience of driving an identical car for almost two years, emphasizing the rarity of such vehicles. @Crazycatman0001 echoed this sentiment by sharing his own enjoyment of a similar model, highlighting its uniqueness and appeal.
Neutral: @Beatnicker (The Seller) clarified that the car is mostly original with some exceptions, including European headlights and front seats from a C4 S4. They acknowledged that the digital screen displaying computer information is not functioning, but a complete cluster is included for the buyer. The seller mentioned the car has been well-maintained over the years, adding that some minor fixes may be necessary for the new owner. @Mtaesch inquired about service records and past maintenance, receiving a detailed reply about the timing belt and brakes. @Hyybriid expressed eagerness for the seller's further information, indicating ongoing interest among potential buyers.
Negative: @Beatnicker (The Seller) mentioned the odometer is not currently working and that the mileage issue on Carfax was a possible error, suggesting the car has barely been driven in the last ten years. They noted that the AC system requires retrofitting and has not been updated, leading to some uncertainty about its functionality. @Eyetralian raised concerns about the AC system's state, asking for clarification on whether it functions properly, which reflects some apprehension among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's overall condition. Furthermore, @Mtaesch pointed out the need for detailed information on maintenance tasks that may be imminent, highlighting a potential worry about future repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments showcase a strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its engine choice and performance. @r6erik noted it had an "excellent engine choice," while @jaredrawk (The Seller) emphasized the car's daily drivability, stating he drove it frequently and enjoyed its performance against faster cars. Other commenters like @CKKurtz expressed a desire to own and drive the car daily, appreciating its distinctive character and capability. Overall, there is a consensus that this 510 wagon offers a delightful driving experience, appealing to car enthusiasts looking for excitement and uniqueness in their vehicles.
Neutral: Several commenters shared technical observations and inquiries about the vehicle, demonstrating interest in its details. @RobZvara raised questions about the rear axle, revealing insights that the wagons typically had a solid axle instead of an independent rear. @jaredrawk (The Seller) clarified that the current rear axle had been upgraded for better performance. Additionally, @longroof510 requested specific images of the headliner, showing a practical interest in the car's interior condition. This interaction indicates that prospective buyers are engaged and eager for detailed information, which affects their purchasing decisions.
Negative: While the comments were generally positive, some concerns arose regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @aerocare asked if it was ready for daily driving, indicating apprehension about reliability. @Jaredrawk (The Seller) admitted to a non-functioning gas gauge after a recent trip, highlighting a potential issue that could deter cautious buyers. Overall, while there was admiration for the vehicle's attributes, such doubts about its reliability and functionality could impact opinions among some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commentators appreciate the overall condition and rarity of the vehicle, particularly highlighting its status as a slicktop model which is considered rare among the 991.1 series. @FreeStateCavallino noted the beauty of the car and mentioned that if it had a manual transmission, it would be a coveted find. @BentatWheel remarked positively on the car's care and maintenance, indicating that it has likely been babied throughout its life. Additionally, @B.Fryk praised the stunning aesthetics of the vehicle, especially its black paint, and expressed confidence in its low mileage and immaculate DME (Digital Motor Electronics) report, which has boosted bidder confidence.
Neutral: The comments reflect a consensus on the possible need for specialized services like the DME report, with @lowellperry suggesting that any serious buyer would require it to avoid future financial pain. @KLDELONG (The Seller) indicated efforts to obtain this report by purchasing a diagnostic tool, acknowledging that they are not specialists in the technology. Dialogue surrounding the vehicle's maintenance history is also neutral, with various commenters, including @Zapata, inquiring about service items such as the age of tires and battery, while acknowledging the seller's meticulous service record.
Negative: Despite the generally positive comments, some concerns have been raised regarding the vehicle's interior, particularly about warped door panels. @ziodesign pointed out that the door panels are notably damaged and attributed this issue to heat exposure, which is common in non-full leather interiors like this one. The seller, @KLDELONG, initially expressed surprise at discovering the damage, leading to discussions about its potential causes. Several comments queried the Carfax report regarding a recorded accident, with @sandyshoes38 requesting clarification on a damage incident from 2025, indicating that some potential buyers felt wary about the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as "sweet," "cool," and beautiful. @Dino886 noted its slightly jacked-up look, while @FMW1 and @MoparisKing found it to be very cool. @BoordyAndTiny shared nostalgic feelings, imagining the wagon as a perfect addition to a lifestyle, potentially used at the drive-in. @matchmark (The Seller) highlighted its wonderful performance, offering assistance and reassurance about the vehicle's condition, making it clear this wagon is a standout choice.
Neutral: Several comments provided practical inquiries or neutral remarks about the vehicle, focusing on functionality and parts. @ErikG asked about the effectiveness of the AC and heating, while @JCervantes pointed out a potential typo regarding the braking system. @Goes2fast2 inquired about the tire width and ride height, and @sixty6chevy and @mike_rockwell mentioned concerns regarding some maintenance aspects. These comments reflect a hopeful curiosity about the practical details surrounding the car's performance and history.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle, albeit more subtly. @UncleBaldy inquired about potential paint bubbles on the repaint, and @Jim_Whitmer was concerned about the history of the timing chain replacement. @mike_rockwell discussed the notorious window seal leaks in older models, underscoring a desire for assurance regarding the car's overall condition. @BTUCKRR pointed out a negative observation about a tire's condition in photos, while @sixty6chevy suggested having repairs made before selling to a potential buyer, indicating some underlying doubts about immediate usability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express high appreciation for the vehicle’s originality and condition, highlighting that it looks as close to its original state as possible. @HollyPBBC mentions the value of keeping the car original over modifications, while @Danno9 reminisces about fond memories associated with the Celica. @drees1434 reflects on its significance as a childhood dream car, and @JWHBOOMER points out how sporty the Celica still appears compared to modern vehicles. The Seller, @Pancakemotors, receives gratitude for maintaining the authenticity of the car and for providing updated images of the steering wheel and dash.
Neutral: Some comments focus on inquiries and observations regarding the car's condition and features rather than outright praise or criticism. For instance, @ibrake4oldcars asks about the steering wheel's appearance under the cover and if the original paint was orange. @Good2Great inquires about the paint job, asking whether the repainted orange is an original factory color. Several commenters, including @drees1434 and @AaronNguyen480, are interested in additional images or videos of the car in action, asserting curiosity about its performance and maintenance history.
Negative: While the overall tone is positive, some concerns arise regarding specific features of the vehicle. @sliproc notes that the car may not be smog legal in California. Moreover, @HDND questions the absence of air conditioning and mentions not observing a compressor in the pictures, while @AaronNguyen480 raises a concern about the steering wheel being off-centered, prompting a discussion about its potential need for alignment. However, @Pancakemotors reassures commenters that the car drives well and provides clarifications on the absence of air conditioning.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2011 Porsche Cayenne Turbo is highly praised for its luxurious specification and desirable options, making it stand out from standard models. The interior features extensive leather, including a high-end full leather dashboard and the Walnut Interior Package, which enhances the cabin's upscale feel. Additionally, the Burmester High-End Surround Sound system is noted as a must-have option that significantly elevates the audio experience.
Neutral: The seller has provided detailed information about the vehicle's specifications, maintenance, and features, such as the 500 horsepower twin-turbocharged V8 engine and 8-speed Tiptronic S transmission. The Cayenne Turbo is described as running and driving as expected, with recent service work completed, addressing air suspension and other components. There are mentions of uploading walk-around and driving videos to showcase the vehicle's condition and performance, which could help potential buyers make informed decisions.
Negative: Concerns were raised by potential buyers about the condition of certain aspects of the vehicle, such as the spare tire compartment and the servicing of the differential and transfer case. While the seller confirmed the inclusion of the spare tire and other accessories, there was no record of the transfer case service, leading to further questions. The seller has stated that it functions properly, but the lack of documentation may cause hesitation among prospective bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors appreciate the unique style and design of the vehicle, with @Tripledigit highlighting the interesting vehicles made by Honda in the 80s. @McFood finds it to be cool and funky, inquiring about its weight capacity. @sneakypete67 expresses a desire to purchase a fleet of these vehicles for friends, showing enthusiasm and interest in the fun aspect of the vehicle.
Neutral: @1969L88 (The Seller) provides factual information about the weight capacity, stating it is factory-rated for 180lbs and confirming that he personally weighs 195lbs with no issues, achieving a top speed of 33mph. @ShineOn engages with @1969L88 by asking about the brand name of his helmet, indicating a casual conversation surrounding accessories related to the vehicle, while also complimenting its appearance.
Negative: @1969L88 (The Seller) shares his opinion that the helmet he purchased on eBay does not offer much protection, suggesting a concern for safety. @ShineOn reinforces this by commenting on the helmet's appearance, stating it looks good like a ball cap, which may imply a lack of confidence in its safety features.
![]() |
Duntov Award-Winning 1966 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 4-Speed
194676S102422
Lot 238011
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and impressive features. @90sundevil, @boaboyoz, and @Rick662 all describe the Corvette as stunning, with @boaboyoz referring to it as a spectacularly stunning C2 and @74Impala labeling it as the best year for Corvettes. @Fuelieguy also notes it is absolutely stunning, and @Vinipizzetta calls it a timeless classic in beautiful colors. Furthermore, @RockyS (The Seller) emphasizes the car's blue-chip collectable status, solid investment potential, and thorough documentation, suggesting a high level of confidence in the vehicle's quality and appeal.
Neutral: A few comments take a more neutral stance, focusing on inquiries about the car's functionality and specifications. @C3Lee raises the question of whether the car is suitable for driving or is mainly a trophy piece, while @MaineDoc expresses interest in gauging the market for similar vehicles, as he has a comparable model to sell. Several comments from potential bidders reflect curiosity about specific details and functionality, like the performance of the power windows and A/C system. Meanwhile, @FDP and @Motorheaddude ask for clarification on various mechanical repairs and documentation issues surrounding the vehicle's history, indicating a desire for transparency rather than outright criticism.
Negative: Some comments express concerns regarding the vehicle's documentation and authenticity. @Motorheaddude questions the validity of the Protect-O-Plate and other documentation, emphasizing the importance of original paperwork for investment potential. He argues that discrepancies in documentation could deter potential buyers. @RichardPrince and @NCRSmaniac contribute to this discussion, suggesting that the absence of original documents does not necessarily negate the car's quality but raises concerns among collectors. @Fuelieguy further questions the originality of the spare tire and wheels, hinting at the possibility of after-market parts affecting the car's value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @theeast (The Seller) expresses great pride in offering the 2024 F150 Single Cab with its distinctive 5.0 V8 Coyote engine, highlighting its impressive suspension and fuel responsiveness. Commentors like @RWB_AZ and @MitchHungLynch echo this enthusiasm, appreciating the truck’s modernized classic design and robust features, praising the vehicle’s overall aesthetic and quality. @Cargeek81 notes that aside from possibly adding a supercharger, everything about the truck seems top-notch, and @Viraje reassures potential bidders that bidding often heats up as auctions near their conclusion.
Neutral: Several commentors express curiosity over the truck’s history, noting that four owners within two years seems unusual. @sofakingbad shares concerns about this, while @theeast acknowledges the uncertainty but affirms there are no current issues with the vehicle and emphasizes its factory warranty. Commentor @Dixie11 wonders why bidding seems low considering the truck's desirability, indicating that others share an interest but are hesitating in their bids.
Negative: Some commenters express hesitance concerning the truck’s ownership history. @reflectorj and @sofakingbad both voice concerns about the rapid turnover of owners, suggesting that it raises red flags. Additionally, @BigEnos remarks that standard cab pickups appear odd nowadays, reflecting a wider skepticism about the truck’s appeal among potential buyers in the current market.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster describes the vehicle as beautiful, highlighting the attractive red and black color scheme and wishing good luck to the seller. @gottagetone praises the car's gorgeous condition, noting it has been well maintained by its owners. @NTB (The Seller) adds to this sentiment, informing prospective buyers that the car has won multiple first place awards at Northern California concours following a frame-off restoration, although the trophies have gone missing.
Neutral: @mcj4250 offers an interesting comparison of color schemes, suggesting that the car’s red with black fenders appears superior to a newer luxury automobile that features black with red fenders. @Leif_in_Calif provides historical context about the car's brand involvement in early racing, mentioning its noteworthy placements in the 1929 Le Mans race. This indicates knowledge of the vehicle’s background that could appeal to collectors or enthusiasts.
Negative: @skipcon expresses a desire for a video demonstrating the car's convertible top operation, which highlights a potential buyers' concern over its current usability. @billyblyth comments on the car's relatively low horsepower of just 75, suggesting that some may be surprised by its performance compared to similar vehicles from the same era, implying that the car may not meet expectations for modern power levels. @NTB (The Seller) mentions that the convertible top has not been taken down for years, showing a reluctance to provide additional information or features that some potential buyers may seek.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @craZee mentioned that their buddy loves the vehicle, indicating a positive experience as a driver. @jpsurfer (The Seller) highlighted the Jeep's unique selling points, emphasizing that it is a 1-owner vehicle with low mileage and full dealer servicing. @gspilot praised the seller's responsiveness to inquiries and the provision of supporting documents, showing an appreciation for the service and transparency offered by the seller.
Neutral: Multiple commenters are actively asking important questions about the vehicle's maintenance history and recalls. @rlrbmw inquired about repair images related to minor damage, and @MikeNoLomotel sought clarification on recalls and maintenance records, valuing due diligence before potential purchase. Additionally, @seabeckredneck suggested that the seller compile responses to frequently asked questions in a single format for everyone's benefit.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding vehicle maintenance and issues potentially indicated by symptoms mentioned. @MikeNoLomotel pointed out a flashing AC light that may signal a malfunction, while also emphasizing the need for thorough maintenance history scrutiny. @JustMe1 criticized certain potential buyers for asking unnecessary questions that could detract from the auction experience, suggesting that some interactions may be counterproductive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as "absolutely stunning" and with "one of the best colors," which indicates a high appreciation for its aesthetics. @maxxfish7 calls it "incredible piece of art" and feels compelled to bid on it, highlighting its desirability. Other commenters like @jimmytheirishman share similar sentiments by acknowledging its beauty and expressing a sense of admiration, stating that it deserves more love. @Larik echoes this by implying that the car's specifications are impressive. @DavilB and @jrb007 also recognize the car's aesthetic appeal and express positive wishes, solidifying the vehicle's overall allure.
Neutral: In terms of technical details, @yannzag (The Seller) confirms that the Aston Martin DB12 uses an AMG-powered engine, providing specificity about the vehicle's performance with a hand-built 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 capable of impressive metrics. Other commenters engage in a discussion regarding the specifications of the engine, clarifying that while the vehicle features an AMG engine, it might be tuned or modified to better fit Aston Martin's standards. @Jano4 explains that although the engine is based on the AMG family, the internals might be bespoke to Aston, prompting further inquiry from others like @Speedraser and @DavilB about the specifics of these modifications.
Negative: There are some reservations regarding the vehicle's servicing and whether it can be properly maintained. @jrb007 expresses concerns about the lack of qualified service options within a 100-mile radius, indicating a barrier to ownership for some potential bidders. @Speedraser questions the extent to which the engine in the DB12 is truly bespoke to Aston Martin versus being primarily AMG in nature, suggesting confusion or dissatisfaction regarding the vehicle's engineering lineage. This line of inquiry reflects apprehension about the vehicle's maintenance and parts sourcing, which may deter enthusiasts looking for a more unique Aston Martin experience.
![]() |
51-Years-Owned, 454-Powered 1951 Chevrolet Fleetline Deluxe 2-Door Sedan
9JJA7028
Lot 238018
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @BubbaGPZ1100 described the vehicle as a wild looking beast and nicely done, suggesting it has an impressive appearance. @mike_rockwell expressed admiration for the unique fastbacks, indicating that it stands out in the market. @rickaz humorously noted that the car is fast due to its distinctive school bus yellow paint, further cementing its status as a hot rod, while @pigman reminisced about a similar vehicle he owned, highlighting the car’s appealing color and engine performance.
Neutral: @Larry1011 (The Seller) communicated details regarding the vehicle's mileage, clarifying that the chassis has approximately 16,000 miles and the engine has around 4,000 miles. They also assured potential buyers that the car is roadworthy and would not encounter inspection issues. @mikes440 inquired about inspection and functionality, asking if all lights, gauges, and brakes function properly, indicating a practical approach from potential buyers towards the vehicle's operational state.
Negative: Some comments reflected a sense of impatience or disappointment about the lack of dynamic demonstrations of the car. @TheCritic sarcastically demanded a big smokey burnout, suggesting that potential buyers want to see the vehicle's performance capabilities. There was also a mention from @mikes440 about potential drivable issues, asking if the vehicle has any leaks or overheating problems, which might indicate concerns about its reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @2FAM (The Seller) provided detailed information about the 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL600, emphasizing its impressive specifications including the Brabus T12 package, Brabus wheels, and upgraded brakes. They assured potential buyers that the vehicle comes with a comprehensive service record and has been prepared for sale with numerous maintenance upgrades, ensuring it is in excellent condition. The owner's commitment to transparency adds to the vehicle's appeal, showing that family values are upheld in their business practices.
Neutral: @DeutscheRedhead expressed curiosity about why the vehicle has been on multiple auction platforms without being sold. This raises questions about the market's perception of the car's value or potential issues that could be discouraging buyers. @Benz_Barn further inquired about the vehicle's current condition, including specific features and a request for additional visuals, which indicates some level of interest but also caution regarding the vehicle's reliability.
Negative: @lionsfan54 raised concerns regarding potential oil leaks in critical areas of the engine, which points to possible underlying issues that might affect performance. Although @2FAM (The Seller) addressed the concern and mentioned that they fixed a dipstick seal leak, the fact that these concerns were raised at all could indicate that prospective buyers might need to investigate further before making a bid. Overall, the history of the car returning to auction may suggest that it has not met buyer expectations or has underlying concerns that remain unaddressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Cheth20 praises the vehicle for its attractive wheels and appreciates the additions and maintenance, expressing a positive sentiment with "Lots to like about this." @Andymonium (The Seller) shares his enthusiasm about the car, describing it as a joy to drive and noting it has been a great car to own. He highlights that it fits well within the "penguin" aesthetic while paying homage to its heritage with the British Leyland logo in the wheels. His experience participating in autocross events further underscores the vehicle's sporty nature, contributing to its enjoyable driving experience.
Neutral: @mbp remarks positively on the modifications made to the vehicle but questions the ride quality, indicating curiosity about its performance on regular roads versus tracks. @ShineOn notes the car's age, labeling it as almost an "antique," complimenting it as a prime example of the "New Mini" — suggesting a favorable view based on its design and historical context. @whoosh expresses curiosity regarding the reasons for selling the car and specific technical inquiries, indicating interest in understanding its condition and maintenance history.
Negative: @whoosh raises concerns about the functionality of the right window not sealing properly, indicating potential issues that could affect the car's usability. @Andymonium (The Seller) responds to these concerns, explaining the nature of the window problem, the diagnostic efforts made, and that leak issues aren't present, but acknowledges wind noise at high speeds. @13VT's suggestion hints at the potential frustration of troubleshooting these problems, and @Andymonium further details the measures taken to rectify the issue, demonstrating an ongoing struggle with this vehicle aspect.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Steveprice1 presents a well-maintained 2018 JK Willys Wheeler that boasts low mileage and numerous add-ons, enhancing its appeal for potential buyers. Commenters, like @Mp5513, compliment the Jeep's attractive appearance and express excitement for summer adventures. @Steveprice1 emphasizes the vehicle's readiness for action and encourages bids, highlighting its rugged stance that has received positive feedback from friends and family.
Neutral: @Steveprice1 mentions the ongoing auction with three days remaining, and @Vickieavc1 provides updates indicating interest and bidding engagement. The comments hint at a community response to the listing, with various individuals showing interest in the vehicle while asking questions for clarification, such as inquiring about the Jeep's engine cover. The seller's engagement indicates an active communication line with potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arise with a comment from @K5D questioning the engine cover's alignment, suggesting a possible issue with the vehicle's maintenance. @Vickieavc1, as the seller, addresses this concern by explaining that the cover was not secured after an oil change, reassuring potential buyers that it does not indicate any underlying problem. This exchange indicates that while there are some doubts about the vehicle's condition, the seller is responsive and willing to clarify issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ExclusiveMotorClub has presented this rare M6 Neiman Marcus Edition as a well-maintained vehicle with a rich history, noting it came through a prestigious partnership program. Buyers praised it for its unique styling and the exceptional sounds produced by its engine. @sdrcp expressed admiration for the car's striking color combination and recognized the high standards of care that have been applied to it, reinforcing the seller's assertion that it has been meticulously maintained.
Neutral: Several commenters participated in a discussion about the car's features and history. @flyconstant raised a query regarding the vehicle's Carfax records mentioning engine checks, to which @Revsrav provided an explanation. @BavarianHotwheels noted some inconsistencies with the vehicle's components, referencing the headlights and bumper cover, thus stimulating further discussion about the vehicle's original specifications and any potential modifications made post-accident.
Negative: While many recognized the car's appeal, @BavarianHotwheels raised concerns about discrepancies regarding the headlights and bumper cover that could indicate non-original parts or repairs from the accident. This comment prompted a defense from @ExclusiveMotorClub, who asserted the car is original. However, @BavarianHotwheels remained skeptical, arguing based on previous experiences with similar models that the bumper cover's reflectors should not be original, raising questions about the car's authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, noting its stunning beauty and unique color. @aaronc325is describes the car as 'beautiful', and @jcole calls it a 'stunning piece of kit'. Additionally, @Raffi praises the rare non-original color that suits the Avanti's design, while @Dollycat3 expresses enthusiasm for the car as a perfect match for an upcoming event. Overall, the general consensus is that the car is visually impressive and has a lot going for it.
Neutral: Several comments touch on technical details and historical context regarding the vehicle. @480Elder raises a question about the lack of air conditioning which is typically an option on these models, and @dagmar82 mentions the original specifications of the Avanti as a 'class act'. @PrivateCollectionMotors (The Seller) also clarifies the car's condition, stating that it runs well and requires some servicing, reflecting the standard expectations for vehicles from a long-term collection. There are discussions about the car's unique details, like the coins in the door sills, which tie into the vehicle's nostalgia.
Negative: Some commenters raise concerns regarding specific features and potential issues. @steveboilard inquires about close-up photos of potential cracks in the dash, indicating worries about hidden imperfections. @isolovers and @thesunisrising discuss transport costs, with some skepticism over high quotes they have encountered, while @retrostude mentions a preference for the original sills over the silver dollar versions. These comments imply that while the car is impressive, there may be logistical or aesthetic concerns that need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, with @Rynoclarke indicating that they find the car appealing. @AB2112 also showed interest by asking for driving videos and horsepower details, suggesting that they are engaged and excited about the potential of the car. Furthermore, @mcqueens, the seller, provided detailed information about the Corvette, noting its incredible upgrades, perfect condition of the original hood, and inviting potential buyers to reach out for further discussions.
Neutral: The seller, @mcqueens, communicated essential details about the auction for the 2013 Corvette, mentioning that there are a few days left for bidding. The seller also highlighted that upgrades and all original components are included and welcomed any inquiries from interested parties. Another comment from @JJFrenzy inquired whether the vehicle was a 1LT or 2LT model, indicating a desire for more technical specifications without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle, but @TDown's inquiries about dyno numbers and ballpark horsepower might suggest a level of scrutiny regarding performance metrics. The lack of specific responses to these technical questions could imply potential concerns or the need for more detailed performance information from the seller.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Symbolic_International highlights that this 911S is a significant model, noting its connection to Steve McQueen as a testament to its quality. This sentiment is echoed by @Bobbity, who expresses nostalgia for owning a similar car, acknowledging the charm of these early models. @roberto adds that despite its minor issues, the car remains a rare collectible, and a buyer will take pride in owning such an iconic vehicle. @paul_howey suggests that this may be a good opportunity for buyers looking for a classic car they can enjoy and improve over time.
Neutral: Comments from various users request additional information about the car's condition and history. @rgupta250 seeks specific details about whether the engine and transaxle numbers match, indicating a desire for official documentation. @Ngsd101 and @jeremyneufeld both highlight the need for more thorough documentation and photographs that capture common rust areas, which would help potential buyers gauge the car's condition. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, responds positively, promising to provide these details and more photos, demonstrating engagement with the community's requests.
Negative: Conversely, there are several criticisms about the car's condition and presentation. @Ngsd101 and @GECONN question the logic behind presenting a car that needs polishing without professionally addressing its condition first. @70SATMan and @flo68 express concerns about the paint quality and potential underlying issues, suggesting that there may be hidden problems that are not immediately visible. @Larmo63 emphasizes that the car could have been presented better with more attention to detail, calling into question the overall value and appeal without proper restoration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @deleted praises the C63 S Coupe, calling it one of the best modern AMGs and noting that a lead instructor at the AMG Driving Academy consistently chooses it for track laps over other models, indicating its high performance. @HalogenLTD (The Seller) highlights the car's impressive $100k MSRP and $25k in factory options, making it a top-tier choice. They also evoke the excitement that these modern V8 AMGs bring, comparing them to the exhilarating feelings of driving 60s hot rods while also being excellent handlers. @KLN825 shares their own positive experience with the AMG engine, calling it a great modern hot rod despite finding their previous AMG GTS impractically noisy.
Neutral: @Mooney201 asks about the C63 S Coupe's build on the C sedan platform, showing curiosity about its specifications while @KLN825 confirms it shares the W205 C Class platform but notes the S Class coupe is a different model altogether. @cocomats chimes in, noting that the 'S' in the model name stands for 'Sport' and is available across all AMG variants, contributing factual information to the discussion. @HalogenLTD (The Seller) welcomes the ongoing interest in the auction and encourages potential buyers to ask questions, fostering an interactive dialogue.
Negative: @ardensales raises concerns about a possible split on the rear driver side tire as seen in the listing photo and requests more information on the tire conditions and any fault codes present, which points to a potential issue with the vehicle. @HalogenLTD (The Seller) addresses this by acknowledging the observation and clarifying that the tires were installed in mid-2022 without any faults or warning lights in the system, trying to reassure potential buyers. Additionally, @tfs1946 brings up a reported collision damage noted on Autocheck, which raises further scrutiny about the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @JQBeerman praising its gorgeous color and recalling fond childhood memories associated with it. @Caymanorcarrera highlighted the car's original features, noting the pristine condition of its interior and its appeal as a well-maintained classic. @flyingburrito mentioned that their own similar colored Targa gained unexpected attention, suggesting that the Wine Red color resonates well with enthusiasts and passersby alike. Overall, the general consensus about the vehicle was positive, showcasing a combination of aesthetic appreciation and historical significance.
Neutral: The seller, @bill930p, engaged with potential buyers and provided details about the car's history and restoration efforts. He noted the presence of some documentation since 1982, detailing previous ownership and maintenance records. Additionally, he promised to upload videos showing the car's functionality, responding to specific requests from commenters such as @mnancar for a cold start video, and @Dr_Outback's query regarding picture resolution. This interaction and provision of information helped maintain interest and kept the potential buyers informed about the car's condition.
Negative: Some criticisms emerged from commenters regarding the photo quality, with @Dr_Outback requesting higher resolution images to better assess the condition of the paint. Despite @bill930p's explanation that the images were compressed upon upload, the concern about visibility of details lingered. The response about the brake light from the drive video, which appeared during filming, also raised concerns about the vehicle's immediate needs despite the seller assuring that it would be addressed prior to delivery. This contradiction in the vehicle's advertised excellence and the need for minor repairs created a slight skepticism among some viewers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered enthusiasm for its unique Shark Blue color, which has been widely praised by commenters such as @GarrettNFord and @mugskillet, who highlighted the hue's appeal. @Toms992 referred to the color as 'gorgeous,' while @WearingBearings noted that Shark Blue truly shines when seen in person. Overall, reviewers frequently expressed admiration for the Turbo S's striking appearance and high-quality finish, reinforcing its desirability as a luxury sports car.
Neutral: The car is being sold by @CarCaveSRQ, the original owner, and comes well-equipped with a range of high-end options that add to its performance and comfort, including a Soul Performance Exhaust system and advanced technology features. It has been driven and serviced as per manufacturer recommendations, and the seller has provided all service records and original components to reassure prospective buyers about its care. Interestingly, while some commenters have brought up service-related questions, like @dunlap742 inquiring about the brakes, the seller confirmed that the ceramic brakes were recently inspected and are in good condition.
Negative: In terms of imperfections, @CarCaveSRQ mentioned that the car has some small chips on the nose and hood, indicating it has seen regular use. Additionally, there is no paint protection film (PPF) applied to the vehicle, which might concern some buyers about potential damage or wear over time. However, these minor negatives seem overshadowed by the overall positive sentiments expressed about the vehicle's performance and aesthetics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its status as a fascinating car and a pinnacle in American design. @BigRed called it a fascinating car with a captivating auction history, while @Dollycat3 referred to it as "exceptionally gorgeous." @tlc123 also emphasized its stunning design, further complimented by @stugottz who noted that it exemplifies why Cadillac is considered the "Standard of the World." Overall, many expressed their enthusiasm for the vehicle's aesthetic and historical significance.
Neutral: The conversation also included some requests for information and clarifications about the vehicle. For instance, @DocMGL inquired about the absence of air conditioning, to which @kz78hy and @63impalaboy clarified that while air conditioning was available in convertibles starting in 1956, this specific model does not have it. @MyAutoEmpire prompted for additional details, specifically asking for the trim tag and engine casting number. This indicates an interest in the car's historical details and authenticity.
Negative: On a less positive note, some comments reflected concerns regarding the vehicle. @KingDragon raised a point about the lack of pictures of the top of the car, while @MyAutoEmpire's request for further documentation, including the trim tag and engine casting number, suggests some potential buyers may feel uncertain about the car’s complete history or condition. Despite the overall appreciation, these comments highlighted some gaps in the available information that could affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's appealing features, with @cannonlivestock expressing excitement about the LX470 and offering detailed information to potential buyers. Commentors like @cannonlivestock and @Nshuscle82 praise the awesome rig, exceptional interior condition, and overall unique build, appreciating the aesthetic and functional aspects. Commentors like @samem and unique_preowned emphasize their admiration for the vehicle's stance and quality, noting the exceptional care reflected in the listing.
Neutral: The seller, @cannonlivestock, promptly responds to inquiries about specific functionalities, such as the sunroof and CD player's operability, confirming that both work well. Additionally, the conversation includes a discussion about the suspension's softness and the measures taken to address steering issues, indicating a thorough maintenance approach. Commentors also inquire about additional features like fuel efficiency with the new gear set, showcasing an interest in practical information about the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there are concerns raised about potential issues, particularly regarding the steering wheel shake and suspension condition. Commentors like @EyesUp and @jefferson790 question the implications of the steering shake, while @bromar112 points out potential effects of the deleted AHC system on functionality. The seller acknowledges the concerns but reassures that the suspension remains in good condition and that they are addressing balance issues, indicating awareness and responsiveness to potential buyer worries.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the 1999 Jaguar Vanden Plas, praising its beauty and condition. @tvth996 highlighted its aesthetic appeal, while @Cepat22 noted the Emerald Metallic color as unique and perfectly complementing the interior, suggesting that it would appeal to both daily drivers and collectors. @Patioboater corroborated this by sharing a personal experience with the color, emphasizing the difficulty of capturing its true essence in photos, which could add value for potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @jagmo, provided detailed responses to questions regarding the vehicle's features and history. They mentioned that the vehicle has undergone over $7,000 in maintenance and described its current operational status, including functionality of the radio, windows, and climate control system. However, the seller acknowledged existing minor issues, such as a scratch on the fender and a malfunctioning cruise control system, ensuring transparency with prospective buyers.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about specific aspects of the vehicle, including @davesjag's inquiry about the missing bright molding around the windshield and @Adobe's observation of cracks in the wood trim. Additionally, there were reservations about the timing chain issue mentioned by @Cepat22, which could pose a concern for future maintenance. Furthermore, @Nickmd1403's question about the door stop indicated potential issues with door closure, showcasing that there are factors to consider for any buyer.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentators have expressed admiration for the truck, with @Dollycat3 highlighting its original California yellow/black plate design. @Trcook67 also shared their affection for the vehicle, inquiring specifically about the electrical components, indicating a genuine interest in its functionality. @Manderthal characterized the truck as a fair old example that can still be enjoyed while improving it, reflecting a positive perspective on its condition and potential.
Neutral: Questions regarding the truck's current status have been raised by @Dogtownracer, who inquired about its registration after noting that tags show registration until July 2024. @Hankfloyd (The Seller) confirmed that the truck has not been registered since a past owner's passing and addressed concerns about the truck's color history, stating that it may have originally been blue before being painted green. Additionally, @jdt10768 asked about the functionality of a cracked window, showing practical considerations for potential buyers.
Negative: There are concerns from @ExSpontanous about potential complications with title transfer and registration in California, pointing out uncertainties regarding the title holder and possible back fees owed to the DMV. @rovak235 humorously questioned the inclusion of vise grip pliers found on the engine, suggesting a lack of confidence in its mechanical state. Overall, some commentators express caution due to the truck’s registration history and condition, while acknowledging the emotional context tied to its sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Gearhed64 shared a nostalgic memory of learning to ride on a bike like this, expressing a hope to own an Enduro in the future. @NormalNorm described the vehicle as the original fun bike, highlighting its light 125 chassis combined with the power of a 175, suggesting it promises a lot of enjoyment. @SpeederP23 conveyed enthusiasm for these period-correct AT1 Enduro race bikes, reminiscing about how enthusiasts would transform them into race machines in the late 60s and early 70s, stressing the excitement and reliability of the AT1 Yamaha.
Neutral: @Veneeshun (The Seller) provided detailed information about the bike's background, mentioning it was originally owned by Robb Talbott, fully restored with enhanced power to 175cc and having been displayed in a museum. Additionally, @Paris2 inquired about period-correct parts, showing interest in the authenticity and performance enhancements of the bike. @crazy4cars asked about the preparations made to ready the bike for sale, which @Veneeshun confirmed included cleaning the carburetor, flushing the fuel system, and checking the spark system before reselling.
Negative: @WillotheGlen pointed out an error in the description regarding the engine type, clarifying that it is a two-stroke single. @Skiman questioned the absence of an electric start, indicating that he remembers earlier models having this feature. @OldGuy remarked on the conversion of the bike from Enduro to MX specification, pointing out discrepancies in the details such as the front wheel size and the ignition system.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its aesthetic appeal and mechanical soundness. @Tito1967 described it as a beautiful model, which implies the car's design and overall look are impressive. @johnnyb11 remarked on the chassis condition, indicating that it sits nicely, which suggests good maintenance. @Showtime1 (The Seller) also highlighted the vehicle's engine, a healthy-sounding small block, sparking interest in its specifications, particularly noting its 383 engine model.
Neutral: Some comments raised general inquiries about the vehicle’s specs and operational status without strong opinions either way. @NIKISUPREME and @EddieC66 asked about the last oil change and mileage respectively, pointing towards a desire for detailed maintenance records. Additionally, @MartyKC and @mcss454 inquired about the transmission type and whether the car has air conditioning, reflecting an interest in practical functionalities rather than expressing overt positivity or negativity.
Negative: On the downside, several commenters pointed out areas needing attention, indicating concerns with the vehicle's performance. @Badger97 requested documentation of any blemishes or flaws, suggesting that the vehicle may have undisclosed issues. @artm1 expressed concerns about potential mechanical problems related to the nitrous kit, mentioning the importance of a compression test to rule out significant issues such as ring or head gasket failures. Collectively, these comments highlight a cautious approach to purchasing the vehicle, emphasizing the importance of transparency in reported conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @OWLBYRD commented positively about the vehicle, noting its beautiful appearance and expressing admiration for the feel of the W12 engine. @OWLBYRD also mentioned their own experience with a similar color, Peacock Blue Metallic, highlighting the variety of stunning blues available for Bentley cars. @Euro_Classica, the seller, presented the car enthusiastically, emphasizing its gorgeous design and well-maintained mechanical condition, along with a range of luxury features that enhance the driving experience.
Neutral: @MTH provided a neutral critique, questioning the accuracy of the paint and leather descriptions used in the listing, suggesting that they were somewhat oversimplified. @nylonoxygen echoed this sentiment, feeling that the color description was lazy but still acknowledging the car's loveliness. @Rance6 asked about the number of owners the car has had, and @sanders010 inquired about the number of keys available, signaling a desire for more information without expressing a clear opinion.
Negative: There were hints of criticism regarding the seller's effort and accurate representation of the car. @MTH and @nylonoxygen expressed skepticism about the descriptions provided in the listing, indicating that they didn't reflect the car's true allure. This critique was coupled with observations about the listing's ongoing status on eBay, suggesting potential concerns regarding its marketability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, describing it as gorgeous and well-maintained. @RS1111 noted the unique color of the seats, while @Oilman highlighted the impressive condition of the car after 19 years, especially the driver's seat. @Darnouts expressed confidence that the lucky buyer would love the German luxury muscle car, and @Lonnberg complimented its great specifications and visual appearance, particularly the matching colors.
Neutral: Several comments sought more information about the vehicle's history and any potential damages. @rollng_stone asked about maintenance records from before March 2023, while @memiller74 inquired about noted damages on the Carfax report. @Braj (The Seller) responded to these queries, stating he would provide more detailed maintenance records and clarify that any recorded damage was minimal and primarily cosmetic, occurring from bottoming out rather than an accident.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and condition. @magujia mentioned the potential issues of owning such a car and the importance of having deep pockets for repairs. @Adamas inquired specifically about damage records, and @Benzjamin pointed out a possible inconsistency in paint meter readings that might suggest previous paintwork, indicating hesitation among potential buyers. Additionally, @Mancowerks asked for further clarification on minor accidents noted in the records, signaling some apprehension about the vehicle's past.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its beautiful aesthetics, particularly highlighting the "stunning" Slate Gray color and elegant design. @Dollycat3 described it as "absolutely stunning" and expressed admiration for its well-documented history and care. @HedgeSnake mentioned the meticulous restoration process and concluded that the car's understated beauty exceeds what can be captured in photos. Positive feedback also includes remarks about the vehicle's condition, with comments like @Caymanorcarrera’s describing it as "unbelievably tidy" and @Frankieballs’ noting its striking appearance in photos, which reflect its high-quality restoration.
Neutral: Several commenters posed inquiries about specific details regarding the vehicle, such as @Kitsbeach asking about the type of paint used and @Cal discussing the 911S badge. @Xharlie requested clarification on the paint color, which was addressed by the seller, confirming it as Slate Gray and explaining its dynamic appearance in different lighting. Additionally, @marovellil raised questions about the hood badge, indicating an interest in its correctness, while @Kcheves suggested modifying the rear emblem to reflect the car's transmission type instead of its sports designation.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the authenticity of some features, notably the 911S badge which @marovellil tagged as "wishful thinking" due to its absence in U.S. markets during the car's original production year. Some critics pointed out the discrepancy in the hood emblem's color, asserting that it should be orange rather than red. @Kcheves echoed a similar sentiment, suggesting that the current emblem could mislead potential buyers. Overall, these negative remarks revolved around authenticity questions which could impact buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bad_Chadi (The Seller) emphasized that the 2007 BMW Z4 3.0si drives like new, powered by the reliable N52 Inline-Six motor delivering 255HP. The seller praised the smooth and quick 6-speed automatic transmission, describing the vehicle as lightweight and powerful, providing great handling and modern technology. The reviews are complemented by claims that this model stands out for having hydraulic steering and being one of the last to feature a naturally aspirated engine. @Bad_Chadi further highlighted that the convertible top operates swiftly, taking just 6 seconds to open or close, enhancing the driving experience.
Neutral: Multiple inquiries were made regarding the car's condition and features, with @Sonzoil requesting drive and engine running videos, while @Evansdad01 sought close-up photos of scrapes on the front lip. @jackamazonwgn inquired about potential discoloration on door cards and confirmation of the audio system specifications, while @Z4forMe requested to confirm a local viewing request. The seller provided updates and addressed questions about the vehicle's specifications, including the wheel types and the absence of aftermarket parts as confirmed by @schreyguy.
Negative: @RatherJaded expressed disappointment over the car's color, revealing a hesitance to own another silver BMW, comparing it unfavorably to their previous experiences. @Evansdad01 noted the presence of scrapes on the bumper, suggesting a desire for further visual confirmation. Additionally, concerns were raised about the mixed tires on the vehicle, prompting @schreyguy to ask for recommendations on whether to replace them all, highlighting a concern for the vehicle's maintenance and visual condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @IslandGuy describes the vehicle as a superb car with an amazing exhaust note. @bowiebiewer praises the RWD Spyder's beautiful specifications, highlighting the RWD Performance models as the end of an era for naturally aspirated V10s. @Plywood222222 expresses admiration for the car's great appearance, and @aero99 acknowledges the vehicle as a wonderful car that requires caution when driving due to its rear-drive setup.
Neutral: @kunzmj raises a concern about the accuracy of the power specifications in the listing, noting that RWD performance models typically feature 562 hp, while Quattro models come in at 602 hp. @GoingNative loves the car but mentions plans to wait for a version with all-wheel drive, indicating a preference for the Quattro. In another exchange, @bayjet (The Seller) responds to @aero99's perspective on the Quattro's grip and details the advantages of the RWD model's design for pure driver engagement.
Negative: @aero99 cautions that the rear-drive configuration can get 'more squirrely' and that the Quattro may be more enjoyable and safer for less experienced drivers. Though overall positive about the vehicle, he expresses concern over the driving experience for those unfamiliar with powerful rear-wheel-drive dynamics. @JakeL inquires about the launch counter and overrev counts, suggesting a focus on performance states rather than outright admiration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TennCarGuy noted that while the vehicle appears to be a lot of work, it has the potential to be a cute ride once restored. @stugottz also shared a perspective from someone familiar with rust issues in the Northeast, mentioning that they have tackled worse projects and felt this one could be manageable. In addition, @GBRBiLL mentioned their experience with similar models and indicated that parts supply is fairly good, pointing out a specific source for parts.
Neutral: @CraigInPA suggested that a video showing the vehicle starting and running, even if it does not stay running, would provide valuable insight into the engine’s health. They expressed concern over the extent of the rust, particularly around the windscreen and A pillar base, but concluded that the rust may not be terminal after all. @Thumbbass8 added that there is a video from a past failed sale listing, which might offer more information about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @jamesholmgren remarked on the significant amount of rust present, which raises concerns about its longevity and structural integrity. This sentiment was echoed by @CraigInPA, who highlighted the complexity of the rust repairs needed. Overall, the comments reflect a clear worry regarding the vehicle's condition owing to the rust, with several commenters stating that it could be a challenging restoration project.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Overall, several commenters appreciate the aesthetic appeal and quality of the vehicle. @SoExSo mentioned that despite reservations about the targa model, it is still a beautiful automobile worth owning. @GaryRoach highlighted the joy of driving the car, acknowledging the significant mileage it has covered while still maintaining its allure. @GMIE2023 and @kurttief both shared positive personal experiences with their own Targa models, emphasizing the pleasure these cars bring to their owners.
Neutral: Many users expressed a need for more information regarding the vehicle's condition, specifically about the targa top and potential mechanical issues. @Aipx and @Arctetra indicated concerns about the creaking noises observed in the video, while also requesting borescope photos for additional assurance. It was noted by @SWVintage (The Seller) that some of the sounds might not be as severe as suggested and acknowledged providing further updates on the car's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by a few commenters about the potential mechanical issues, particularly around the targa top and IMS bearing. @chbaxter1 pointed out the lack of oil analysis documentation, which is crucial for addressing metal debris in the oil. @Fargie and @Aipx echoed worries about the rattling noises of the targa model and insisted on clarification before bidding. Additionally, @SWVintage (The Seller) reported that repairs were needed for the targa top's functionality, which shows it is not fully operational as expected.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wever1951 expressed admiration for the wheels on the vehicle, mentioning that they own a similar convertible and love its color scheme. @Chefgordiemac highlighted the personal customization aspect of cars and suggested a tasteful paint match for the hood and a switch to black or chrome wheels, emphasizing that cars should reflect individual taste. @Nitrousbird also noted that the vehicle is fixable and mentioned that modifying cars can be enjoyable if done properly, indicating a positive perspective towards customizing the vehicle.
Neutral: @Gm8351 inquired about the shipping options for the vehicle, the availability of the original wheels, and requested information about the damage mentioned in the CARFAX report. @BillT44 questioned the rationale behind the door modifications, suggesting that it may not be a beneficial change. @Gm8351 showed interest in whether the original exhaust components were included, showcasing a neutral curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history.
Negative: @59soldus23 expressed concern that reverting the modifications could lead to the vehicle resembling a typical 2017 Stingray Coupe, implying a lack of uniqueness. @BillT44 suggested that the modifications could be detrimental rather than advantageous. Additionally, @bovice25 raised questions about the vehicle's catalytic converters and its compliance with California smog regulations, indicating potential legal or practical issues with the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @OldGuy commented that the vehicle is a clean example of a rare model, expressing intrigue about its handlebar design. @209klassiccycles currently owns multiple Cushman Auto-Glide scooters and appreciates their uniqueness and fun factor, despite their challenging ride. @Soflomobilia, the seller, highlights the rarity of the Cushman Auto-Glide, stating they were only produced for two years and encouraging potential buyers to bid with confidence as they can assist with shipping.
Neutral: @209klassiccycles asked for specific images related to the engine's clutch side and the frame number, showing an interest in verifying components. @Design1212 inquired about the shipping cost to their location, and @Soflomobilia responded promptly with a range for shipping quotes, estimated between $850-$1000. There were several exchanges between the seller and interested buyers regarding technical specifics about the scooter's frame number and engine.
Negative: @209klassiccycles pointed out some concerns regarding the current engine being a mid-40s replacement, missing parts like the generator setup for the lights, and the condition of the carburetor. The user expressed uncertainty about the state of the scooter, asking if the seller knew whether it was operational and if the fuel tank and petcock were in good condition. @Soflomobilia, the seller, confirmed that the scooter has not been running for some time and was intended for display purposes.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the vehicle's restoration and appearance. @brettlbrewer reminisces about his first car, a 1969 model in a similar color, appreciating the classic features like side marker lights and the grille. @msrichmond emphasizes the car's quality, noting the rare presence of an OEM oil filter, and praises the meticulous restoration efforts by the owner, a former Ferrari mechanic. Additionally, @trcassidy shares fond memories of owning a 1969 model and highlights the enjoyment it brought, while @TRW1992 reflects on the advanced design of these cars compared to British sports vehicles of the era, indicating a strong sentimental value associated with them.
Neutral: Several commenters engage with factual and technical discussions surrounding the vehicle. @flaviaman (The Seller) provides specific details about the tire date codes and clarifies that the rear seat is factory vinyl, not leather, showing transparency in the car's aspects. @bradyzq questions the engine condition, prompting a response about the engine's recent retorquing and standard specifications. Comments from @GageDave and @Fiatplus delve into advice about steering idler replacements, with shared experiences enhancing the dialogue regarding the car's maintenance and history.
Negative: On the downside, some comments raise concerns about potential issues. @MikeVeloce questions the alignment of the driver door, suggesting it may have a common structural problem, prompting @flaviaman (The Seller) to clarify that the door hinges are not torn. Additionally, the comments mention minor aesthetics like buff marks on the car, which @flaviaman notes could be professionally addressed but acknowledges their visibility. While these criticisms are minor in the grand context, they do highlight concerns about the car's condition that may concern prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Siriusitech (The Seller) provided a warm introduction, expressing their enthusiasm to assist in selling the truck, highlighting that it is a well-cared-for one-owner vehicle from Southern Alabama. @Thistle_Dew commented on the beauty of the truck and raised a practical question about the fuel level upon sale, revealing a genuine interest. @Siriusitech (The Seller) assured potential buyers that the truck would come with a full tank of diesel, showing a commitment to customer satisfaction and a friendly approach in answering queries.
Neutral: @PAGSDIII701 simply described the truck as 'decent', which does not provide much insight but suggests a neutral stance on its quality. @4byFreak expressed confusion regarding the value disparity between two-wheel-drive and four-wheel-drive trucks, highlighting an ongoing market perception issue. They noted their personal preference for two-wheel trucks due to cleanliness and driveability, indicating that they could use a work truck and expressing a need for more awareness around two-wheel-drive models without direct interest in the seller's offer.
Negative: Despite positivity around the seller's approach and the truck's condition, there is a noticeable discontent from @4byFreak about the perceived lack of interest in two-wheel-drive trucks, perceiving it as an undervaluation in the market. Their frustration suggests a potential challenge for the seller in marketing a two-wheel-drive vehicle, as it may not meet the expectations of most buyers who prefer four-wheel drives. Overall, while the truck is presented well, market perceptions regarding truck types may hinder its appeal.
![]() |
2025 Ford F-550 Super Duty Lariat 4×4 Six-Door Conversion by Adrenalin Industries
1FD0W5HTXSEC60787
Lot 238049
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commenters hailed the vehicle's impressive dimensions and overall aesthetic, describing it as large, cool, and a sensational build. @mynsbgr noted its ability to navigate tight grocery parking lots with ease, while @boaboyoz described it as being 'in charge and cool AF.' @Barry_O expressed excitement with a simple 'Good lord. In a good way.' Additionally, @ShineOn praised the quality and ingenuity of the seller's builds, showing deep admiration for @adrenalinsports' capabilities in creating such remarkable vehicles.
Furthermore, potential buyers expressed enthusiasm regarding the vehicle's specifications and build, with @jonate24 calling it 'next level' and the best he has seen. Several comments pointed to the impressive interior space available, suggesting that it could comfortably suit larger families or adventurous trips, as mentioned by @hudd07.
Neutral: Comments included many questions and requests for additional specifications regarding the truck, demonstrating a keen interest in understanding its practical features. @cavesster and @ShiftHappens inquired about adaptive cruise control and fuel capacity, showcasing a desire for detailed information from @adrenalinsports, who promptly answered their queries. This interaction highlights buyers' concern over features that may enhance driving convenience and practicality. Overall, the vehicle's size raised logistical questions as users contemplated fit in personal spaces, balancing excitement with practical considerations, as mentioned by @Middler89.
Negative: While overall reviews were positive, there were a few critical comments focused on the absence of certain features, notably adaptive cruise control, which @cavesster lamented. This sparked some back-and-forth between users and the seller as @Mbnieder humorously noted that the truck 'slows for no one.' Additionally, there were comments expressing concerns about competition in the market, with @Cubano67 pointing out the lack of bid history and skeptical about the promotion of the vehicle. The discussion suggested potential buyers were weighing the truck's features against comparable options, revealing some hesitation in the bidding process.
![]() |
LS3-Powered 1963 Chevrolet Chevy II Nova 400 Sport Coupe 6-Speed
30437N110330
Lot 238055
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @tesoffice enthusiastically described the vehicle as 'Bitchin!!', while @jamcracker found the design stunning, even inquired about specific features like the glove box door. @johnny0620 referred to it as a 'work of art' and expressed admiration, noting that it was every car enthusiast's dream to own. @rmwcali praised the build quality, calling it 'Sick Build GLWA', which contributed to an overall positive sentiment from these commentators.
Neutral: @NameTaken2 raised a question about the ignition key's placement below the dash, wondering if it might affect left knee clearance during driving. @LateToLearn seemed interested in the suspension's adjustability and asked about a sound that may be backfiring. @genrl chimed in with a more technical perspective, suggesting that the noise could just be wind noise and noting that backfire on deceleration isn't necessarily harmful to the engine.
Negative: @ICU_UCME expressed concerns regarding the original build's authenticity, asking for photographs of factory GM stamps and noting missing bolts on the front subframe. The comments also indicated curiosity about the condition of the door poppers, questioning whether they worked properly, and @MooseChevelle inquired about the license plate placement and whether the AC was functional, which was confirmed to not work by @csalyards (The Seller), who mentioned looking into the issue.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @soldiermedic88 describes the vehicle as "niccceeeee," indicating strong enthusiasm. @Mjb1980 expresses a desire to own the G36 AMG, emphasizing that it is a top-tier example in the US and encourages potential buyers to consider its rarity and quality. @Envypete also shares positive sentiments, calling it a "beautiful unit" and wishes the seller good luck with the sale, reflecting an overall appreciation for the vehicle.
Neutral: @BlueChipServices (The Seller) addresses several inquiries regarding the vehicle, including providing details about the odometer issue, explaining it was a mistake made during servicing. They also respond to questions about the rear seating comfort and cargo space, confirming that while the rear cabin is shorter, the vehicle remains spacious for adult passengers. Additionally, they assure potential buyers that the car has been well-maintained without significant tampering and provide documentation such as inspection reports and export certificates.
Negative: @canadagoose raises a concern about the odometer issue, indicating a need for clarity regarding its accuracy. @bartrix questions whether the front seat legroom is affected in this two-door model, hinting at potential accessibility issues for taller drivers or passengers. @bmhan seeks more information about cracks in the wood trim and possible rust, which could suggest quality concerns, while @BTrailer_221 inquires about the alignment of the steering wheel, suggesting potential maintenance issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bad_Chadi (The Seller) showcased the impressive features of the 2012 Porsche Panamera S, highlighting its powerful 4.8 Liter V8 engine which operates smoothly and efficiently. According to @Bad_Chadi, the car drives like new and has a strong and reliable engine that can deliver 400 horsepower, making it capable of quick acceleration. The seller also shared videos of the car in operation, demonstrating the driving experience and engine starting process, which emphasizes its excellent performance without any issues, such as warning lights on the dashboard and good oil pressure even when warmed up.
Neutral: The conversation features inquiries from potential buyers such as @TangerineDream, who asked about the age of the tires, and @ColdStack, who expressed interest in viewing the vehicle. @Bad_Chadi responded promptly to these queries, confirming that they can accommodate tire preferences at a dealer discount price and inviting @ColdStack to share their contact info for further discussion. The seller's engagement indicates a willingness to assist potential buyers with their needs and questions about the car.
Negative: There are some concerns related to the vehicle's tires, as mentioned by @TangerineDream, who pointed out that the date codes on the tires are from 2013, which could imply they may need to be replaced or are nearing the end of their lifespan. While @Bad_Chadi reassured that tire replacements can be made, the mention of older tires could be a red flag for some buyers regarding aspects like safety and performance. This situation could potentially deter those who prioritize vehicle condition and part replacement when making a purchasing decision.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jkrueger appreciated the detailed information provided by @SmithVolvo regarding the Wokke-V12 chip set, expressing gratitude for clarifying that those chips should not pose issues during smog checks. @chicosito also confirmed that he has had no smog issues with his vehicle equipped with Wokke chips and provided insights about differential upgrades, which could enhance performance. Overall, there is enthusiasm about the vehicle's potential, with several commenters expressing a sense of community and sharing helpful insights about the car's modifications.
Neutral: @SmithVolvo (The Seller) actively engages with potential buyers by addressing questions regarding the car's condition and modifications. He reassured one commenter about the car's performance over rough roads and indicated that additional pictures would be provided. Commenters like @Duke_Dallas and @chicosito sought clarification on details like the seat color and interior features, suggesting that while the car is presented well, some specifics need further confirmation. The dialogue also hints at a desire for more visual documentation to aid in assessing the car's condition and attractiveness.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle's condition, with @Mark635CSieuro noting a potential rattle over rough surfaces, which might indicate issues with the suspension. @Duke_Dallas pointed out small dark spots on the seats, prompting a request for further inspection from @SmithVolvo. Additionally, @tingbro mentioned scratches observed on the hood, requesting close-up photographs to better evaluate the impact on the car's aesthetics. This feedback suggests a need for thorough inspection and possibly more transparency about the vehicle's cosmetic flaws.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its neat floorplan, which seems to appeal to potential buyers. @sweetcars expressed approval with a thumbs-up emoji, indicating satisfaction with the layout of the Cabot limo.
Neutral: @Collinswork, presumably the seller, appreciates the interest shown in the listing and welcomes inquiries. Their response is polite and offers assistance, which suggests a commitment to customer service.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments reflect a positive sentiment towards the vehicle and its presentation. @zildjian11 expresses excitement about the listing and wishes good luck to other bidders, while @marksaint describes the car as beautiful and beautifully presented. @1970ls5 appreciates the design of the car, specifically mentioning the appealing AMG wheels and hinting at their importance in the car's aesthetics. @subspd praises the seller's attention to detail in addressing questions about the car, emphasizing a high standard of care, which resonates well with potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @AndriiKlymuk, provides detailed responses to various inquiries, maintaining a professional and informative tone. For example, he answers questions regarding original parts, the functioning of the antenna, and the inclusion of a hardtop cart, reinforcing a sense of transparency in the auction process. He also mentions sourcing an original factory radio for the car and updates on the condition of the instrument cluster as well as other maintenance aspects, which showcases a commitment to presenting the vehicle accurately.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by commenters that may suggest potential issues with the car. For instance, @hopalong asks about a possible misalignment in the left front parklamp and questions whether the vehicle has been in an unreported accident based on paint meter readings. Additionally, @bdmackler inquires about the condition of the roof cylinders and the absence of service records poses a worry for some prospective buyers. Such comments indicate a level of scrutiny among bidders, suggesting that the vehicle may still have elements that need addressing.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the quality and enhancements made to the vehicle. @scotty2293 described it as 'Peak M5 perfection,' while @JFBaker expressed nostalgia for their own M5 and interest in this one. The seller, @nnrt, outlined extensive modifications totaling over $42,000, including high-end parts like HRE wheels, JRZ suspension, and an Akrapovic exhaust, which many find indicative of a well-cared-for car. @comraddrewsky noted the excellent build, and @Mfwhitlock added that it is a 'Beautiful build!' suggesting positive sentiment toward the vehicle's condition and upgrades.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional details about the vehicle, including potential modifications, emissions testing, and service history. @jvuong and @My911fixxx both expressed interest in the mods and service records, highlighting a common desire for more information. The seller, @nnrt, responded to queries regarding emissions testing in Connecticut, mentioning that the vehicle has passed inspections in the past. Others, like @godspeed1029, raised concerns about the warranty status, and @comraddrewsky asked specific questions about the tune and condition of certain components, indicating a cautious but engaged interest.
Negative: A few commenters expressed concerns about the vehicle, particularly in relation to its modifications and service history. @My911fixxx was hesitant about the tune, indicating potential apprehension regarding the reliability and impact of the modifications. @comraddrewsky also noted the lack of detailed knowledge from the seller about key aspects of the car, which made them uncertain about proceeding with bids and expressed potential reservations about the absence of a warranty. Overall, while there are positive sentiments, concerns around the vehicle's modifications and uncertainties about service history prompted a more cautious attitude among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @YnotBuy describes the Bronco as a sharp looking vehicle and wishes good luck to the seller and bidders. @MontanaBroncos expresses enthusiasm for the 78/79 models, noting the unique chromatic tape stripes from 79, emphasizing that it's all about the look these days. @Machineman80 and @boaboyoz both admire the white color with chromatic stripes, while @Eurocharged appreciates the immaculate paint, suggesting a collective admiration for the vehicle’s aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, @Goldcountryclassics (The Seller) assures potential buyers of the truck's reliability and share their willingness to provide additional photos, demonstrating an engaged and responsive seller.
Neutral: The comments reflect a mix of historical context and technical inquiries about the vehicle. @jrmbtr questions the gearing in the replacement axles, indicating an interest in performance details. @ikia expresses a fondness for the generation 2 Broncos and requests additional pictures, especially topless ones. In contrast, @CDehne and @nprouty engage in a discussion over axle specifications to clarify the vehicle's description, leading to a collaborative effort to ensure accurate information about the build.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the accuracy of the axles described in the listing, as noted by @CDehne and analyzed by @nprouty and @Todd_Z., who dispute the seller's claims about the front and rear axle types. @CDehne points out that the Dana 50 listed from a 1997 F250 should be an IFS design, while @Todd_Z highlights that the front axle is incorrectly identified as a closed knuckle design. This suggests some skepticism about the seller's technical details, potentially impacting buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @HyannisHonda expresses confidence about the vehicle's performance, noting that it drives as it did when new, emphasizing its special status. The seller also acknowledges interesting points made by users about the car's wheel covers and offers clear communication about the car's features and accessibility, inviting potential buyers to arrange a viewing. @MARTY_ROTH shares a nostalgic appreciation for the 1954 Capri convertible, suggesting its aesthetic appeal and making a personal connection to similar models from the past.
Neutral: Several users, including @johnmacchia and @gocorcoran, engage in a technical discussion regarding the car's interior and the details of its engine specifications, addressing potential confusion around the vehicle's historical context. @S_Bauer inquires about the functionality of the power seat and the car's seating height, to which @HyannisHonda responds positively regarding its performance and comfort. @50plymouth requests to view the car in person, which reflects common buyer interest in verifying vehicle conditions before making a purchase.
Negative: @robinsgd raises concerns about potential fluid leaks from the vehicle if left idle, which @HyannisHonda addresses by admitting that older cars typically have some leaks but reassures that the car was dry after a two-week period. @mothertrucker questions the accuracy of the seller's engine description, noting a potential discrepancy which reflects a level of skepticism about the seller's claims. Overall, users express a mix of curiosity and caution regarding the vehicle's details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @oo3menace expressed admiration for the car and noted its significance for gauging the market trajectory. @peanutbutterfordogs found the red interior striking, while @speeddemonTX complimented the car's cleanliness. @Nycrew024 praised the vehicle's color and unique front end design, stating a preference for the USDM front over the JDM style. Both @mugskillet and @RichD14 shared their love for these cars, with @ShiroTheHiro reminiscing about their own positive memories associated with the ITR. Enthusiasm was also echoed by @Jahson954, who is excited to see the final sale price.
Neutral: @Bao84, the seller, clarified that the vehicle will pass California smog regulations. However, @Snuvet75 requested a clearer photo of the pink document regarding the timing belt service, leading to a discussion with @pmayer26, who provided context about the importance of the document. @Codemunkee and @Yachtmastersllc engaged in a discussion about the rarity of the color configurations available in the ITR, highlighting the differences between the Canadian and U.S. models. @JoeVita explained the vehicle's high resale value, emphasizing its rarity in North America and the lack of import fees as a point of interest for potential buyers.
Negative: Conversely, some comments revealed skepticism about the vehicle's high price. @Crocofantu1979 questioned why it sold for such a high amount previously, considering other cars with lower mileage sold for significantly less. @JoeJo3 doubted that the vehicle would achieve a price above the $80,000 range this time. Additionally, @Jack-Porsche noted how the car's performance has aged compared to modern vehicles, pointing out the technological advancements in newer cars. @JoeVita commented on the need for the car to receive better detailing to enhance its presentation, suggesting that lack of attention could affect its value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @emelton24, the seller, emphasizes the quality and reliability of the Scout 800, stating it features a refreshed 304 V8 engine with electronic ignition and an automatic 3-speed transmission. The vehicle is described as starting reliably and providing a great driving experience, enhanced by a meticulously redone interior, including new foam, vinyl, and custom stitching, amounting to $4,000 in upgrades. Multiple commenters also express admiration, including @gr33nsc0ut, who calls it "a beauty," and @johngosinski, who acknowledges it as a good-looking unit.
Neutral: Several questions regarding the vehicle's specifics are posed by commenters. For instance, @ecshield inquires about the model year, which @emelton24 clarifies as 1967. @gr33nsc0ut also asks about the wipers, which the seller confirms are still vacuum operated. Additionally, @bsw questions the driver space and potential height restrictions, prompting @emelton24 to share that they are 6'2" and fit comfortably, agreeing to try and provide a picture of a taller driver for reference.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding some aspects of the Scout's condition. @mm4519 raises issues about seatbelts for the rear bench and inquires about the fit of the detached top, asking if it leaks or has weight specifications. @emelton24 acknowledges there are no rear seatbelts but notes they can be added easily. Additionally, @mm4519 reports potential paint chipping or early rust, to which @emelton24 assures that it is just chipping paint with no rust issues, and provides details about a common oil drip problem seen with Scout models.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NotMrSheamus mentions that the vehicle is great for grocery runs, highlighting its practical use for daily tasks. @CKKurtz expresses happiness that there is a reasonable supply of these awesome rigs and hopes to have one on the farm someday. @Sixracer sees the vehicle as a great tool to tackle projects around the property, indicating its utility for outdoor work, while @Fairmont663336 shows interest by inquiring about the tire dates, suggesting a desire to assess its readiness.
Neutral: Comments such as @CraigInPA's suggest that there's some ambiguity about the vehicle's classification since he jokingly contemplates if it's a backhoe. @pbf777 raises concerns about the vehicle's legal status, particularly regarding its registration and ownership since it may still technically belong to the D.O.D. This reflects uncertainty about military surplus vehicles without proper documentation such as the SF-97 form as noted by @KurtBWNews, which further complicates the picture.
Negative: Several comments reflect skepticism or humor about the vehicle's capabilities. @70_duster characterizes it as more of a tractor than a truck, while @Beans_Bacon humorously states they are selling their own tractor for no apparent reason. @Redbird41's request for paint meter readings and a report indicates concerns regarding its condition, suggesting that potential buyers have reservations about its maintenance or history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, calling it a 'lovely' example with accolades such as 'Beautiful!' and 'This one checks every box!' @Snuvet75 exclaimed "Lovely!!" while @99NCNSX highlighted its impressive condition, stating, "Wow, this will be fun to watch. I know the owner and the car. They don’t come any nicer than this one. No excuses here." @Ultimate_Combination remarked on its rarity, emphasizing that these beauties are "only becoming more rarer and rarer!" Several others, including @chefdek and @grandhawa88, added their compliments, underscoring the car's beauty and the seller's reputable standing in the NSX community.
Neutral: The comments offered some factual insights regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and specifications. @Rod67 pointed out that while the car is beautiful, it requires some maintenance such as a timing belt and coolant hoses. @ELW_Z8 raised a question regarding service records, leading @The_Dude_Abides (The Seller) to clarify that the timing belt was last serviced back in 2014. Furthermore, @jamesreidy noted a positive experience he had with @The_Dude_Abides while purchasing a previous NSX, establishing a level of trust in the seller's transparency and customer service.
Negative: Despite the overwhelming praise, a few comments voiced concerns over the vehicle's maintenance needs. @Luv2Travel stated, "The maintenance questions are valid since the car is 30 years old and has seen very little road use," stressing on the importance of maintenance to ensure reliability. @Rod67 echoed these concerns by referencing his own ownership experience, advocating for a thorough examination of both beauty and maintenance history. @Garcia1986 questioned the uniformity of the paint, hinting that the car may have undergone some repairs, which added a layer of skepticism to the otherwise glowing reviews.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the 1986 Yamaha VMAX for its impressive condition and iconic status. @Superhawk65 remarked on the bike being a 'unicorn' due to its excellent condition and low mileage. @CobraVic11 expressed admiration for the seller's restoration efforts, noting that the driving video evoked mixed emotions of happiness and sadness. Additionally, @newfiebullet described the bike as gorgeous and highlighted the fun these big-bore 80s motorcycles provide, especially in straight-line performance.
Neutral: Several users appreciated the seller's involvement in the auction process, with @DMCCs mentioning the availability of shipping options across the U.S. and timely responses to inquiries. @AZkid sought clarification regarding the true mileage of the bike, to which the seller confirmed the original 2,700 miles, indicating transparency in the listing. Overall, the communication from the seller was noted positively, ensuring potential buyers felt informed.
Negative: Not all comments were entirely positive; @tmc_61 pointed out the odd seating position and poor handling of the motorcycle, despite admitting it was a glorious ride. @johnjm echoed similar sentiments regarding past experiences with the VMAX, emphasizing the bike’s unique character despite its drawbacks. Such criticisms suggest that while the motorcycle is cherished by many, it does have elements that may deter some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, including @boaboyoz who referred to it as a "charming C20" and praised the build, wishing good luck to the seller. @Tatotots (The Seller) was appreciative of the positive feedback and highlighted the truck’s readiness for driving, mentioning its rebuilt engine and reliable cold AC. @Carclassic1 also engaged positively, asking for additional interior pictures, indicating interest and enthusiasm for the truck's features.
Neutral: @Shadow76 raised a question about the replacement of the manual transmission with an automatic but later acknowledged it was a factory unit, showing curiosity about the vehicle’s modifications. @toolmantaylor asked about the last California emissions test and fluid leaks, demonstrating a practical interest in the truck's condition while expressing gratitude for the seller's prompt response about the emissions requirements. These comments reflect a neutral stance, focusing on the details of the vehicle without strong bias either way.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle in this thread. However, @toolmantaylor's inquiry about fluid leaks could suggest a concern for potential issues, indicating a cautious approach to the purchase. Overall, the conversation remained largely positive and informative, with no significant criticisms expressed by the users.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JoeyKule described the vehicle as amazing, highlighting that it's only had one owner and is accident-free, expressing a wish to be in the States to purchase it. @Mdfdavie shared that they own a similar model and consider it a beautiful vehicle, noting its clean condition and lack of corrosion, which contrasts positively with their own. They expressed excitement about the potential sale price and confidently predicted that the future owner will be very pleased with the vehicle. @militarydave35 commented on the overall clean condition, suggesting it’s a good example of the model.
Neutral: @iakllc confirmed that the vehicle is front-wheel drive, addressing inquiries from @pjmusselman and @Houseofnine who were unclear about the drivetrain. They also reassured @2nd2none and @Eaats33 that they would provide requested information about maintenance and vehicle features, indicating it's being well-managed by the seller. Additionally, they offered details about some minor wear observed by other commenters, such as in the paint and on the fuel tank area, acknowledging these concerns while reinforcing the vehicle's overall integrity.
Negative: @2nd2none raised questions regarding important maintenance items like the timing belt and brakes, hinting at potential immediate costs for the buyer. @militarydave35 expressed concerns about the immobilizer system, citing possible inconveniences like battery drainage or lost fobs, while also speculating about potential noise issues during driving. @Eaats33 pointed out concerns about flaking paint and a possible dent, which added to potential worries about the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JackMac describes the vehicle as a 'one owner beauty', indicating its rarity and presumably well-maintained status. @time4turbo expresses admiration for the seller's ability to source high-quality Rovers and appreciates the preparation services prior to sale. @havasu25 compliments the vehicle's attractive spec with a black exterior and white interior, showing enthusiasm for its aesthetic appeal and noting the seller's effort to provide detailed information and transparency regarding its condition.
Neutral: @amotorsports (The Seller) explains the rigorous process that vehicles undergo before sale, including inspections and reconditioning. They highlight the vehicle as a standout example, non-smoker, and well-cared-for, which suggests a positive outlook on its overall quality. Nonetheless, they acknowledge the presence of questions regarding specific parts of the vehicle, demonstrating a willingness to address customer inquiries and concerns openly.
Negative: Several commenters, including @goshi and @WAGONBOYTD, raise concerns about the vehicle's condition, specifically question the control arms and suspension components due to mileage, suggesting potential wear. @WAGONBOYTD also mentions the likelihood of issues in rust-prone areas given the vehicle's age, while @Havasu25 details several cosmetic imperfections observed in the photos, including damages to the bumpers, scratches, and a sagging headliner, prompting a deeper inquiry into the vehicle's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly its aesthetics and the enhancements made since it was last listed. @Dollycat3 described it as a "beautiful 911 in classic color combination," emphasizing its visual appeal. @70_duster also praised the listing for great photography, which helped showcase the car well. Furthermore, @Hoppy18 shared their excitement, stating that this Porsche is high on their list of dream cars, indicating the vehicle's desirability and classic charm that resonates with enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made about the vehicle's condition and features, reflecting a keen interest from potential buyers. @BobbySmith asked about an oil leak, while others like @Quicksilver914 inquired about the seat manufacturer, indicating curiosity about the car's specifications. @Brucerudin requested further photos to better understand the condition of the rear footwells, pointing to the seriousness and diligence of potential buyers in assessing the car thoroughly before bidding.
Negative: Conversely, there were noted concerns regarding the car's condition from certain participants, particularly around repair and maintenance aspects. @70SATMan raised questions about a potentially poor installation of a rear bar, expressing concern for the car's structural integrity. Additionally, @ebrand mentioned the oddity of previous owners skimping on certain restoration details like door pockets, hinting at corners being cut during repairs. @bccarey highlighted perplexity over a significant drop in the car's auction bid price compared to a previous sale, raising concerns about the vehicle's value over time.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and performance capabilities. @Puddlian, an original owner, praised the car's tuning and maintainability, noting it has been improved under the current seller. @Stagehand remarked on its beauty and lamented the scarcity of well-maintained models, while @LetMe_ThatPoint commended the unique color scheme of the rims. Others like @homie3186 and @dougbrown echoed similar sentiments, recognizing the car's relatively clean condition and perfection, adding to a positive overall sentiment about its desirability.
Neutral: The seller, @thehansoncollection, provided insights into the vehicle's history and modifications, affirming the tuning process conducted at Off The Line Performance. They mentioned undergoing updates for better driving comfort, including the installation of new engine and transmission mounts. Although the original Racecomp coilovers were not included, the seller assured prospective buyers that factory headlights would come with the car, emphasizing transparency in communication regarding the vehicle's features and condition.
Negative: While the comments mostly consisted of praise, there was an undercurrent of regret associated with the vehicle's sale. @Stagehand expressed a common emotional struggle among owners when parting with cherished cars, and @thehansoncollection acknowledged that they would likely miss this car after its sale. There weren't major complaints about the vehicle itself, but rather a sentiment of sadness about the transition, particularly due to health-related changes affecting how often the car could be driven.
![]() |
12k-Mile 2021 Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro Double Cab 4×4 V6 6-Speed
3TYCZ5AN6MT023333
Lot 238097
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @racerboy221 thinks the vehicle is very cool and @E9couper appreciates its potential for appreciation due to its naturally aspirated V6 and low mileage, noting that it is rare with a manual 6-speed. @CRUSH comments enthusiastically about the 3-pedal feature, calling it nice. Overall, there's a strong appreciation for the vehicle's uniqueness and features, with several comments emphasizing its desirability and engineering.
Neutral: @LoganJames (The Seller) provides practical information regarding the vehicle, including the snorkel which is functional but can be removed, indicating that a hole will be left if removed. He also mentions that all upgrades were installed professionally and he possesses the stock TRD Pro shift knob and an adjustment tool for the suspension, which adds to the vehicle's appeal for potential buyers. Additionally, @LoganJames makes arrangements to meet at the Vancouver border for a possible transfer, showing flexibility in the selling process.
Negative: There aren't any overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided input. However, @Boxonwheels inquires about the snorkel's removal, which could imply a concern about the vehicle's modifications and their impact on original features or functionality. Overall, the tone remains generally positive without significant criticism or concerns expressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @spdway1 appreciates the historical significance of the truck, recalling a family member's connection to a similar model, highlighting its reliability as a daily driver. @tshebel, the seller, emphasizes the truck's solid condition and good performance, noting its reliability and the fact that it starts without issues. @r_carrie finds the unique combination of the truck's straight-back cab and drivetrain intriguing, considering it a rare and interesting example of the Ford AA model.
Neutral: @tshebel answers several inquiries regarding the truck's components, reassuring buyers about the functionality of the PTO and dump body, and clarifying details about the fuel pump and electrical system. He also mentions the presence of rust holes in the dump bed while ensuring the truck's overall soundness and previous safe transport. @bringatrailer confirms that the listing has been updated to accurately reflect the truck's specifications, including the removal of the erroneous mention of a 12-volt electrical system.
Negative: @r_carrie expresses concern over potential rust issues, especially with the dump bed, based on personal experiences with previous classic truck purchases. @tshebel acknowledges some rust in the dump bed and minor scratches on the fender, indicating these as the primary drawbacks of the vehicle. Overall, while the truck has several positive attributes, these negative aspects regarding rust and cosmetic condition are noted as cautionary points for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @steveracer praises the car for its Levinson sound system, describing it as "unbelievable," and highlights its appeal as a vehicle that can handle thousands of miles, suggesting it's a driver's car. @amotorsports (The Seller) states that despite some minor issues, such as a cracked glove box and a trim piece that has a crack due to a known defect, the overall condition of the car is described as great, indicating a generally positive view of the vehicle's performance and quality.
Neutral: @MrRedPants points out the color of the vehicle, noting it is listed as Verdigris Mica but believes it appears to be the same as another color shown on a different sold car, suggesting some ambiguity about the vehicle's color representation. @joeedi55 expresses interest in visiting the car and has already reached out through email for additional information, indicating an intent to learn more about the vehicle.
Negative: @genous comments about noticing "lots of small tears" in the car, which raises concerns about its physical condition, although it is followed by a comment seeking clarification. @deder1012 requests information regarding past damage and repair costs, reflecting a desire for transparency about the vehicle's history. @Semsa70 echoes this concern by inquiring about the location and extent of damages from accidents, suggesting potential buyers are looking for detailed disclosures about the car's past.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TimDSM mentions that he enjoyed riding the vehicle as a kid and expresses a strong connection to it, suggesting that the new owner will appreciate its quality. He emphasizes the careful cleaning process they undertook to maintain the machine's original condition, highlighting features like the intact paint stripe on the rear tires and the immaculate exhaust paint. This attention to detail indicates a well-preserved vehicle that collectors and enthusiasts may find appealing.
Neutral: @gasandgears comments on the rarity of the vehicle, acknowledging that clean, low-hour machines like this one don't come around often and speculating on its potential market value. He suggests that while the vehicle has undergone some parts replacements, it might still attract a good price, estimating it to fall between 15k to 20k. His perspective implies an understanding of the vehicle's growing popularity and under-valuation in comparison to other types of vehicles.
Negative: @Impala6519 questions the price of $47k, expressing disbelief that a vehicle could be valued so high, which might indicate concerns about its market position. @Mark_A's comment reflects the sentiment of longing and aspirational desire, showcasing frustration at the high price potentially blocking childhood dreams. Overall, these remarks suggest concerns around the pricing and perceived value of the vehicle as a collectible.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @504_vintagemx expresses enthusiasm about auctioning the 1989 Kawasaki KD80x, referring to it affectionately as a 'little gem'. Their welcoming tone indicates a commitment to engaging with potential buyers, promising to answer any questions they may have, which creates a positive atmosphere for the auction.
Neutral: In the auction description, @504_vintagemx notes that this is their first entry on BaT, which suggests they are new to selling vehicles online. While this could indicate inexperience, it could also suggest a fresh perspective and the potential for a straightforward buying process. The comment does not draw strong opinions either way but simply presents facts about their participation.
Negative: There are no negative comments about the 1989 Kawasaki KD80x included in the provided information. @504_vintagemx's description lacks any critique of the vehicle, which suggests a focus on its positive aspects. Without any negative feedback, the auction seems to present an optimistic view of the motorcycle's condition and appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @2hecknback praised the vehicle's rad grille, suggesting it might be an upgrade, indicating a positive perception of some exterior features. @MishaelS provided useful clarification regarding the vehicle's color by mentioning that accessory items not in green are all black, giving potential buyers a better visual understanding of the vehicle's appearance. Additionally, @NoGaBiker added a light-hearted comment about the absence of a rear bumper while clarifying its non-existence as a common feature in North American trucks, contributing positively to the community's understanding of the vehicle's design.
Neutral: Several commenters sought more information and details about the vehicle. @fsacb3 asked for videos and more photos, particularly of the undercarriage and rust-prone areas, emphasizing the need for clearer images when considering a purchase. @edgetaylor brought up concerns about registration for an imported diesel vehicle in California, inquiring about necessary import forms, which reflects a general interest in the vehicle’s legal status rather than making any judgments about its condition. @bazookatooth also posed a question regarding the design of the rear windows, suggesting curiosity rather than discontent.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were voiced by some users. @jp00033 emphasized the importance of additional pictures of critical areas such as the frame, bulkhead, and footwells, identifying these as potential trouble spots, indicating a lack of confidence without such information. Similarly, @Stoic77 echoed this sentiment, underscoring the need for more visuals to boost bidder knowledge and confidence, suggesting that the current presentation may not be sufficient for serious buyers. Overall, the feedback suggests an undercurrent of caution regarding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
18k-Mile 2012 Ford F-250 Super Duty Lariat Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4
1FT7W2BT0CEB73797
Lot 238059
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: @Braccior (The Seller) describes the truck as having been single-family owned from new and well-maintained throughout its life. The truck has spent the majority of its time in a private collection, consistently stored in a climate-controlled garage, which has contributed to its excellent condition. One buyer, @MarkNeely, also shares praise for a similar truck, calling it the best he has ever owned and expressing confidence that it would fetch a high price at a Ford dealership.
Neutral: Several commenters ask clarifying questions about the vehicle's modifications and features. @Justcaid09 inquires about the engine tune and paintwork on the rear wheel well, while @Jbrown89 and @JLack9090 seek information on aftermarket modifications and the emissions system. In response, @Braccior (The Seller) explains that the paint appearance is due to tire shine overspray and confirms the truck's modifications, including the removal of the DEF system, which would lead to improved fuel economy.
Negative: There are some concerns about specific aspects of the truck raised by commenters. @Motorcar84 questions是否有 rubber missing on the steering wheel, and @Valkyrja notes that it doesn't seem set up for a gooseneck. @JLack9090 also expresses that the auction's price is increasing, indicating some hesitation among potential buyers. Overall, while there are various inquiries suggesting a need for clarity, there isn't heavy criticism of the vehicle itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @freakinutz notes that the car is nice looking, while @RBailey57 appreciates it being from one of the best years. @Rweiss6 compliments its solid appearance, mentioning having fun with his own MG, and that this one might require a bit of attention but is worth it. @dtl2000 expresses excitement about the car's unique color and its fun driving experience, acknowledging that it's easy to care for and has good parts availability. He also highlights the car's unique wheel design and encourages proper maintenance for enjoyment.
Neutral: @zipexpbrad (The Seller) clarifies that 1st gear is not synchronized but 2-4 are, and discusses the addition of a battery shutoff switch due to long durations between drives. He also explains that the top of the car is not frequently used and may need replacing, while confirming that everything else works as it should. @High_Hope inquires about the wheels, questioning whether they are steel or alloy, to which @zipexpbrad responds that they are factory original steel. @shabah210 expresses interest in seeing the car and seeks a way to contact the seller directly.
Negative: @Rweiss6 raises concerns about the car being driven only 360 miles in 10 years, suggesting that it's a shame for such a solid vehicle. @dave_kentuckee asks specifically about potential electrical issues relating to the battery shutdown and whether the exterior lights function properly, hinting at possible maintenance issues. Additionally, @jbralove1 questions the functionality of the car's top, seeking clarity on whether it closes properly and its condition, indicating potential concerns about the car's appearance and usability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's stunning appearance, particularly its unique color combo. @Yagottabkiddin praises the color combination as 'really nice looking in person,' and @ICTGOAT refers to it as 'The Gentleman’s Hot Rod.' @beige1968GTO shares that the color, Primavera Beige, is more beautiful in person and garners compliments wherever they go. The seller, @Broncoguy84, expresses pride in the car's original factory combination and enjoys the positive feedback on its appearance, noting that many admire its classy and elegant look.
Neutral: Several participants in the discussion share observations about the vehicle's specifics and condition. @georgepehanick asks about PHS documentation regarding the car's original dealership, while @fnoori and @1classic raise questions about potential switches and window functionality, respectively. The seller, @Broncoguy84, provides detailed responses, including confirmation that all windows function properly and describing the meticulous repainting process the vehicle underwent to achieve its current pristine condition.
Negative: There are a few concerns raised regarding the accuracy of the car's color representation and other nuances. @BaronVonZeppelin and @georgepehanick speculate on whether the color may have been altered in some photographs, as it appears different in various lighting. @Renfrick inquires about rust on the body, and the seller reassures that there are no issues. Additionally, @blackhawkdave and @dfhodg express curiosity about specific features, including the functionality of the clock and air conditioning, as well as the unusual shifter, suggesting some skepticism about original equipment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the beauty and design of the vehicle. @JLsKA510 calls it 'a beauty,' while @mrarchi praises the G37 Infiniti's classic design and mentions its great sound system and impressive power. The seller, @honsolocrx, shares their enthusiasm for the car's stunning color and assures that it drives and handles perfectly, with appealing features like new tires and the maintenance of original floor mats. @agreenstine also admires the car's aesthetics, describing it as 'very pretty.'
Neutral: Several comments seek further clarification regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @martingibson requests details about the reported accident and repairs, while @KLN825 asks for paint thickness readings on major body panels, to which @honsolocrx responds positively, committing to provide the necessary measurements. The seller explains the vehicle's history, including its previous owner's cognitive decline and the resulting forced sale, noting that the car is a second owner vehicle and that it's generally in great shape with very little wear.
Negative: There are concerns raised about some aspects of the vehicle. @CK_AP2 notes the potential for a 'notorious differential bushing leak,' and @honsolocrx acknowledges this issue, indicating that it can't be fixed before the auction ends but reiterating it's a relatively easy and inexpensive repair. Additionally, the seller mentions some cosmetic issues, like a corner of paint that peeled off during a repair after an accident, which was touched up. Although these issues exist, the seller remains transparent about the car's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetics and overall appeal, highlighting its low mileage and beautiful Cotillion White color. @E9couper noted how the car's presence evoked imagery reminiscent of a mob movie, expressing affection for the model. Additionally, @Dollycat3 admired the Cadillac's design and interior, specifically the Dark Claret Royal cloth, indicating a strong appreciation for its vintage elegance. @TurboBrad shared a personal experience of traveling across states in a similar Cadillac, emphasizing how enjoyable and reliable the ride was, which added positive sentiment towards the model in general.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the vehicle's specifics without strong bias. @GandalftheGray21 (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the vehicle's rust, confirming that the corrosion was primarily surface rust and mentioned that the car has been garage-kept throughout its life. @smsouthworth inquired about the functionality of the car's equipment, and @Websterjohn expressed interest in obtaining more photos of the vehicle's interior and confirmation of tire conditions, indicating a typical consumer's due diligence when considering a purchase.
Negative: Critical remarks included concerns about the vehicle's options and performance. @CarFoolLane pointed out that some might view the Brougham as underpowered compared to newer models, which might deter potential buyers. @jer4cars raised a concern regarding the absence of cruise control, citing it as a must-have feature, though @GandalftheGray21 confirmed that it is indeed equipped with cruise control. @David_P also noted the oddity of certain modern expectations regarding equipment, drawing attention to the fact that features like cruise control were still optional, suggesting that not all features met contemporary standards.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters shared fond memories and nostalgia for the Chevrolet Cavalier Z24, highlighting its unique styling and engaging performance. @mr_smee appreciated the cowl-induction hood and noted the car's reliability as an understated feature of the J-car platform. @Kiffer850 expressed excitement about the driving experience, reminiscing about the unmistakable sound of the exhaust. @VintiqueMotors and @TurboBrad both commented on the stylish headlight covers, with @VintiqueMotors reflecting on their rarity in modern cars. Others like @JayKay2430 praised the Z24's sporty character and lamented the current lack of similarly compelling vehicles from manufacturers. Overall, there's a strong sense of appreciation for the Z24's design and performance that resonates with those who experienced it during its heyday.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed various aspects of the Z24's features and historical context. @testdummypilot, the seller, emphasized the vehicle's condition and the family-owned business's credibility behind the sale. Some comments prompted inquiries about specific features, like the locking cam on the lower valance and the factory chip guard, which @testdummypilot addressed directly. Additionally, various reminders of the vehicle's specifications, production numbers, and changes over the years were shared, underscoring the Z24's significance within Chevrolet's lineup. The comments indicated a community interested in both the memories associated with the car and details about its current state, reflecting a blend of nostalgia and practicality.
Negative: While many comments were positive or neutral, there were occasional expressions of skepticism regarding the car's originality and condition. @Toivo_ questioned the condition of the chip guard and the validity of the low mileage claim, prompting @testdummypilot to provide reassurances about the vehicle's history. Other commenters raised concerns about the trustworthiness of purchasing a vehicle online, particularly without a physical inspection. Although the seller made efforts to instill confidence by offering extensive documentation and warranties, some buyers remain aware of the potential risks involved in online car purchasing, indicating a lingering hesitation despite generally positive sentiments about the vehicle itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors like @buellwinkle and @XJportfolio expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as "gorgeous" and noting its stunning beauty and sophisticated engineering. They emphasized the car's dynamic performance and elegant design, which offers a supercar-like experience. The unique Ascari Blue color and the rarity of the RS7 Performance package also garnered positive attention, with @XJportfolio highlighting how this particular specification is becoming increasingly hard to find.
Neutral: In the comments, @cdmotor1532 requested clarification regarding the RS7's retractable display screen, expressing some background on their past experiences with Audi models. @LorenzoB asked about the ownership history of the vehicle and confirmed the availability of service records. @Rdulskis inquired about paint condition and the possibility of paint meter readings, to which @Brttshldr (The Seller) assured them that such details would be shared. These comments reflect an interest in obtaining concrete information about the vehicle, rather than just opinions on its appearance or performance.
Negative: Some comments expressed reservations or concerns, such as @Antec900 mentioning a missed opportunity to buy this exact car due to it disappearing from a dealership's listings. @Jam.Rangs pointed out what appeared to be an imperfection near the headlight, although @Brttshldr clarified that it was simply lint. There seems to be an undercurrent of concern about condition and availability from some users, indicating a mix of excitement paired with cautious scrutiny among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its beauty and unique emerald green color. @Edelweiss_Autowerks, the seller, highlighted the car as a fantastic example that requires minimal space in a garage and provided reassurance with the prospect of cold start and driving videos to demonstrate its condition. @sliproc remarked on the appealing tan leather interior, while @crazywolf nostalgically shared their past regrets about selling their own TR6, emphasizing the car's aesthetic and classic appeal.
Neutral: Several participants engaged in discussions regarding the vehicle's features. Questions about the front license plate bracket attachment and overdrive capabilities were raised, with @Opie1 and @uibled seeking clarification. The seller, @Edelweiss_Autowerks, assured bidders that the vehicle’s specs were typical, while providing information about the auction process and sales tax requirements. Additional comments also touched on the performance expectations set by the vehicle's vintage engine, with @groceg sharing their fondness for the driving experience that does not depend solely on overdrive.
Negative: Conversely, some comments pointed out concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and features. @jdjonesdr mentioned a frustrating ding on the valve cover, and @alskin criticized the initial cold start video due to perceived background noise. The debate over the absence of an overdrive system became a focal point, with @groceg expressing discontent with the choice of non-overdrive, while others, like @maggie70, stated their satisfaction without it, declaring such discussions a waste of time. The seller proactively addressed the vehicle's performance, noting acceptable leakdown test results, but the overall apprehension about overdrive highlighted differing opinions among enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @joeveto commented on the fun and efficiency of the vehicle, noting that despite its powerful 6.0L engine, the YJ likely achieves better mileage compared to his previous 2.5, while also offering improved performance. This suggests that the vehicle is not only powerful but also practical for everyday use, enhancing the driving experience significantly.
Neutral: @jjaxmb (The Seller) provided important technical details about the vehicle's condition and performance. The seller mentioned a check engine light and shared findings from the Torque app, identifying a P0118 code, while also indicating that the rebuilt LQ9 motor has only 2,993 miles. The discussion included tire age, stating they are 7 years old with under 3,000 miles of use, along with a gear ratio of 4.10 that pairs well with the V8 engine, and the NP231 transfer case. Additionally, @jjaxmb mentioned registering the Jeep as a "Classic Rod" in Nevada, which exempts it from standard smog checks, due to modifications made to the exhaust system.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by potential buyers about the vehicle, particularly relating to its age and components. @longlostczech asked whether the Jeep would pass NV smog, indicating apprehension about its emissions compliance. Additionally, they inquired about the axle gear ratios and the condition of the tires, reflecting worries about wear over time. The condition of certain components and the uncertainty regarding smog checks may deter some buyers from proceeding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many users praised the overall condition and restoration quality of the 1971 Suzuki T500 Titan, with comments highlighting its beauty and performance. @73edstr6 expressed appreciation for the bike's rarity and potential to stand out at car shows. @Superhawk65 referred to it as a "unicorn," while @rod fondly recalled the bike's handling characteristics, echoing sentiments shared by @K7steppy who praised the seller's efforts in preserving such bikes.
Neutral: Several commenters noted the historical significance of the bike and expressed a mix of curiosity and nostalgia. @Multistrada1 raised questions about the motor rebuild's necessity due to low mileage, to which the seller, @DMCCs, provided clarification regarding the bike's maintenance history. This exchange illustrates a proactive engagement from the seller, who confirmed the original mileage and described improvements made to the vehicle, such as the rebuilding of the crank and noting the original tires still in use.
Negative: While many comments were positive, there were some concerns mentioned. @dragster pointed out a downside regarding the old tires, mentioning that they should be changed for safety despite their originality. Another comment from @whilst remarked on the typical issue of battery acid stains on the muffler, which detracts slightly from the bike's aesthetic. Overall, these criticisms were minor compared to the overwhelming appreciation for the bike's character and restoration.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BTUCKRR expressed enthusiasm for the truck, sharing their own positive experience with a similar model that has accumulated 240k miles, noting its reliability and urging the seller good luck with the auction. @hrangel10 also chimed in, referring to the vehicle as a great truck while requesting additional videos of the cold start, exterior, and interior, indicating a general positive perception of the vehicle's appeal. @DanRod thanked the seller for their provided videos, suggesting that they found the information helpful and informative.
Neutral: The seller, @genevamotorcars, updated the listing to clarify that the truck is an Express model rather than a Tradesman, indicating a straightforward approach to transparency. They also addressed various inquiries from potential buyers, including @dranyam47's request about the bed length and @zipcode's question about the trailer towing package. Additionally, the seller confirmed that the title is now in hand, dispelling concerns about possible delays regarding the title transfer, indicating a clear line of communication.
Negative: @fd2012 raised several concerns regarding the truck's performance, specifically questioning whether the transmission properly shifts into 8th gear and asking for video evidence to confirm the vehicle's operation at highway speeds. Their comments suggest skepticism about the truck's advertised features and performance capabilities. Similarly, @fd2012 also inquired about additional dents or scratches, underscoring a concern about the truck's condition, while @DanRod echoed this concern by asking for a demonstration of the truck shifting through all gears, further highlighting potential doubts among buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar provided a welcoming overview of the 1970 MGB Roadster auction, encouraging interaction and offering opportunities for inspection and test drives. They emphasized the online platform's usability and the enjoyable experience of participating in the auction, asserting that a successful bidder would be satisfied with their purchase. @Caroholic echoed this sentiment, appreciating the car's rust-free condition and its potential as a fun project, highlighting MGBs as great, reliable classics.
Neutral: Comments indicated a diverse interest in the car, with @jamesr626 inquiring about specific technical features like overdrive and @DaveD asking about the roll bar's installation method. @MrBeanCar noted the painting of the engine compartment, while @secondmgbgt shared their positive experience with a Weber carburetor compared to the original SU setup, which sparked a wider discussion on carburetor preferences among enthusiasts.
Negative: Conversely, concerns were raised about the car's modifications, as @ZigMeister60 criticized the Weber carb swap and rattle-can paint job, expressing a preference for the originality of the SU carbs. @sliproc mentioned a broader carburetor debate, noting some enthusiasts dislike modifications, favoring the classic setup for reliability and ease of tuning. Additionally, @nickGrantM's request for clarification on the overdrive feature highlighted possible dissatisfaction with the lack of that specific option.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mike_747 described the vehicle as 'very pretty in red!', highlighting its attractive color. @Coventry2 (The Seller) emphasized the car's excellent condition, mentioning it has less than 13,000 miles, no paintwork issues, and a clean Carfax. The seller also noted the meticulous history of the vehicle, including its purchase from the original owner who ordered it from Cantab Motors. Additionally, they highlighted the inclusion of original equipment and documents, such as a pictorial book of the car's assembly, which adds to its value as a hand-made vehicle.
Neutral: @Coventry2 (The Seller) provided extensive information about the car's history and condition, along with details regarding the items included in the sale, such as various covers and tools. They also noted the past listing on BAT that did not meet the reserve and offered to answer questions promptly. The seller acknowledged a small error in the alignment of a headlight, which they corrected, showing their attention to detail. The seller plans to provide more pictures and videos during the auction period to aid potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments suggested room for improvement, such as @williamglenn95 mentioning the steering column and wheel as potential issues, questioning the manufacturing choices. While @Coventry2 (The Seller) assured that the included tools looked like they had barely been used, the presence of minor imperfections like the misalignment of the headlight initially raised concerns. The seller's past struggles with auction timing have also been seen as a downside, indicating a possible lack of interest during previous listings.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting its aesthetic appeal and luxurious features. @Martinwilson referred to it as a 'Beautiful Cabriolet,' while @Sfurr2014 anticipated that the bidding would reflect its quality, predicting it would reach close to $20K due to its fantastic condition. The seller, @aegmotorsports, outlined numerous high-end features and packages, emphasizing the vehicle's sport package, premium options, and advanced technology like the COMAND infotainment system with navigation, which further enhanced the car's desirability.
Neutral: The conversation included clarifications on specific details about the vehicle from both the seller and potential buyers. For instance, @Martinwilson asked about the date codes on the tires and the number of keys available, to which @aegmotorsports confirmed that the date codes are from 2020 and that only one key fob is present. Additionally, @marksaint inquired about the use of the ashtrays, leading to @aegmotorsports confirming the ashtrays show no signs of use, asserting the vehicle is a non-smoker car with no odors.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle, but @aegmotorsports addressed potential concerns regarding the video presentation by clarifying that any flickering seen in the instrument cluster was due to camera frequency and not an actual issue with the car. This indicates a need to reassure viewers about the vehicle's condition, hinting at possible skepticism among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @foozy100 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a dependable daily driver, having undergone significant mechanical work including new tires and shocks, a replaced muffler, and various fluid changes which enhance its overall condition. He mentions that it drives well and is comfortable for longer trips, indicating reliability due to low mileage. Additionally, @foozy100 emphasizes that despite its age, the truck has been garage-kept and remains in good mechanical shape.
Neutral: Multiple comments express curiosity about the truck's features, such as the functionality of the AC and the presence of a cover for the moonroof. @foozy100 confirms that while the AC works great, there is no cover for the moonroof, suggesting it could be easily made. Other users show interest in the vehicle's condition and performance on longer trips, and @foozy100 responds positively, stating that the truck performs well during the 125-mile journeys he has taken it on, and he does not mind taking it on longer trips given its good condition.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the rust on the truck, with @Mendoza0656 and @drbvintage specifically asking about rust on the underside and potential frame issues. @foozy100 acknowledges the presence of surface rust but insists there are no rust-through spots on the frame, maintaining that the vehicle is in decent shape despite its age. However, the seller admits to leaving some aspects of the vehicle, such as the rear ABS light and non-functioning sunroof, unresolved, which may deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnjm appreciated the color choice introduced by Chevrolet in 1954 and has a fondness for the Pennant Blue with beige interior. @JohnF1966 described the vehicle as a top-shelf restoration that still appears very fresh, indicating a positive impression of the car's overall condition and aesthetic appeal. @Wheels83 complimented the beauty of the car and expressed interest in seeing a video of it driving, showcasing a positive engagement with the vehicle's presentation.
Neutral: @Mgilley (The Seller) acknowledged that the engine might need a minor tune-up, such as changing the plugs, due to the car not being driven for the last couple of years. He mentioned that the engine has a slight tick which could potentially be fixed with some maintenance work. The seller also expressed willingness to provide opportunities for potential buyers to see the car in person. @masatsune requested more detailed information, such as restoration photos and information about body damage, reflecting a neutral approach by seeking clarification without strong opinions.
Negative: @MaineDoc raised concerns about the engine noise, comparing it unfavorably to a quieter experience he had with previous models. @oldsouth inquired about the engine knocking sound and suggested getting compression and leakdown tests done, indicating skepticism about the car's mechanical state. @joeveto criticized the idea that a tune-up would solve the knocking issue, suggesting that it might indicate more serious problems like a stuck lifter, showing a negative perspective on the vehicle's current condition. @gelles expressed a need for video evidence after the spark plug replacement to confirm if the noise issues had been resolved.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @fsantoro described the bike as "absolutely gorgeous!" and @Hayabrusa referred to it as a "very cool build." @minidude echoed this sentiment, calling it an "awesome build." Many commenters appreciated the aesthetics of the bike, noting its design as superior to the new sport bikes that feature a floating seat and large void above the rear tire. They see this particular model, the XSR 900, as appealing and suggest that Yamaha could learn from its design. @rocketrod94533 highlighted the bike's build quality and the expertise of the rider, asserting that the bike is well-crafted and has not experienced any racing mishaps.
Neutral: There were questions regarding the bike's history and construction. @CJJ1960 inquired about the comment on the bodywork being painted as a mock-up, while @Tenere700 pointed out the bike's engine specifications and the absence of a cross-plane crankshaft, suggesting some confusion regarding its mechanical attributes. The seller, @Slassco, clarified that the bike had never been crashed and explained his intention behind the mock-up paint, indicating that it was just a temporary visualization before a complete professional finish.
Negative: However, not all comments were completely positive. @Tenere700 criticized the fit and finish of the kit, mentioning exposed fairing brackets that gave an unfinished look. They also questioned whether the bike had been used on the track, indicating concern over its usage. @rocketrod94533 alluded to misconceptions about the bike being raced, emphasizing that it had only been used in track sessions, which are significantly less intense than races. This raised some doubt among potential buyers regarding the bike's true condition and its history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jdfordha (The Seller) has demonstrated a commitment to transparency in presenting the vehicle for sale, offering detailed photos, underbody shots, and driving videos. The seller provides clear answers to inquiries regarding the car's features and condition, including confirmation that the A/C is functional and the mileage is believed to be accurate at approximately 69,000. Additionally, the seller mentions that the original removable hardtop is included in the sale, which adds value for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments inquire about various features and details of the vehicle, such as the status of the aftermarket radio, the presence of chips and dings, and the condition of the brakes and motor mounts. @RPM28 expressed interest in specifics about the A/C system and the recent maintenance history. Other users, like @RQ58, requested additional close-up photos and video walkthroughs of different components, indicating a thorough interest in the vehicle's overall condition and functionality.
Negative: There were concerns raised about the functional status of components, like the aftermarket Sony radio, which is currently disconnected and inoperative. @JLB2002TII pointed out potential paint defects and asked for a closer look at specific areas. @monkeywrenchsc raised a question about possible paint overspray, which @jdfordha acknowledged could be misinterpreted due to lighting in the photos. These concerns reflect a need for further validation of the vehicle's condition beyond the images provided.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, particularly its aesthetic appeal and service history. @boaboyoz described the black color as 'magnificent' and 'bad a$,' while @urs6e24 highlighted its appealing specifications and service record, suggesting it would be a wise investment in the current market. The general consensus among commenters is that the car is visually striking and has been well-maintained, with @mike_747 noting significant recent maintenance that alleviates worries for future owners. This sentiment is reinforced by @Volga, who praised the rarity and desirability of the spec options.
Neutral: Several comments focused on soliciting additional information regarding the vehicle's specifications and service details. @NCRSmaniac raised questions about the original build sheet and the alcantara seat inserts' authenticity, which @AD15 concurred would be confirmed by a close-up of the window sticker. Additionally, @clean_machina inquired about service records, particularly the recent work done at local workshops, while @juliogo33 questioned what brand of headers were installed. @Worldclassmotorcars (The Seller) responded to many inquiries, promising to upload photos of the window sticker and service records to address concerns.
Negative: A few commenters expressed concerns regarding documentation and maintenance history, suggesting that potential buyers might need to be cautious. @Thetatebaumercollection pointed out a lack of visibility for the window sticker, while @sat5152 highlighted the need for paperwork regarding the clutch replacement. @mike_747 emphasized the importance of having thorough documentation for any service done on the vehicle. Additionally, some commenters noted that the vehicle's mileage brought up discussions about its condition and usability, with concerns about whether high mileage could indicate potential problems, as highlighted by @eurocharged.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @chuckgoolsbee expresses excitement, simply stating, "WINNING!" Many commenters find humor and entertainment in the auction, with @Longmire45 noting that the comments alone are worth a look and @McFood contributing playful banter such as discussing the bus's potential to plead the Fifth if it could talk. The general sentiment among many, including @Tmontana85 (The Seller), is that this bus has been well-maintained, with substantial service records available to the new owner, thus implying a solid foundation for future use.
Neutral: Several comments, especially from @Tmontana85 (The Seller), provide factual insight into the bus's specifications and features, such as fuel capacity and living configurations. Commenters like @dchunk911 and @Tmontana85 discuss technical aspects, including towing capacity and shower functionality, while @CaptainMyCaptain paints a narrative of the bus's presence in Fort Stockton. There's an indication that the vehicle, originally constructed for Charlie Sheen, carries a unique history that appeals to buyers looking for niche items.
Negative: A number of commenters make tongue-in-cheek references to the questionable past of the vehicle, suggesting it has been involved in hedonistic activities, like @viprklr questioning the number of hookers who might have been present. @marc33 humorously inquires about the number of wild parties the bus has hosted, and @Blake1995 sarcastically calls for a black light inspection. There's also skepticism about the condition of the bus, as expressed by @jjdoyle questioning the cleanliness of the Carfax and @robertschachtesq wondering about hidden compartments. Such comments contribute to a playful yet critical narrative surrounding the vehicle's past.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed excitement about the vehicle's high-end features and overall condition. @911c4s noted the nice presentation of the Audi Q7 and was particularly pleased to learn about the recent tires and brakes, which are in great shape with sufficient tread depth remaining. @aegmotorsports elaborated on the vehicle's impressive specifications, including a powerful 3.0L supercharged engine, luxurious interior features, and cutting-edge technology, all of which contribute to its appeal as a full-size SUV. The seller’s preparation and responsiveness to inquiries also reflect positively on the auction presentation.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around logistical aspects and requests for further details. @Imright inquired about the availability of the window sticker and the condition of the wheels, prompting a timely response from @aegmotorsports, who confirmed that the wheels have minor curb rash and that a reproduction window sticker would be provided soon. The seller also reassured prospective buyers by stating that everything on the vehicle is original without any paintwork or bodywork, thus addressing concerns regarding the vehicle's integrity.
Negative: However, not all comments were entirely positive, with some expressing concerns about the vehicle's condition. @Imright specifically pointed out edge damage on the wheels, and while @aegmotorsports assured that refinishing could be done at no charge, it highlights potential issues that might deter buyers. Additionally, the seller had to clarify that any apparent flickering in certain display components during the video was not indicative of real-life problems, emphasizing the necessity for transparency with prospective bidders to alleviate concerns.
![]() |




































































































































































