Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz expressed excitement, calling the vehicle a "wicked Wauseon Ford GT" and a superb specimen, while @gbvetracer congratulated the owner for actively driving the car rather than letting it sit unused. @70_duster and @deadbattery also celebrated the car's use over the years, with @deadbattery highlighting the car's stunning appearance and asking price, noting it would be hard to believe it has 8000 miles. The owner, @bluefordgt (The Seller), shared experiences driving the car and serving as a Goodwill Ambassador for Ford, distributing collectibles and allowing fans to enjoy it at car shows. Several others, including @ToledoViper and @Flynlow427Vette, corroborated the claims about the car being a one-owner vehicle and its immaculate condition, acknowledging the owner's presence in the local car community.
Neutral: Community members acknowledged the vehicle's unique color combination and craftsmanship, with comments regarding the specifications and buyer expectations of the car. @kenkars reminisced about the cost of paint jobs in comparison to current modifications, while @JordGT suggested that professional photography could enhance the vehicle's presentation. @Englishrodder and @GTFRAN discussed maintenance costs and hydraulic performance related to driving frequency, highlighting a practical aspect of ownership. The owner's interaction in the community and active driving of the vehicle indicate a commitment to sharing the experience rather than preserving it solely as a collectible.
Negative: Conversely, @MACUSA raised concerns about the vehicle's ownership history, noting discrepancies in reported ownership on Carfax. User @Crocofantu1979 questioned the vehicle's performance, stating their dissatisfaction with the engine choice in the second generation Ford GT, expressing a strong sentiment against the V6 design. Additionally, @DClary's comment faced flags for being non-constructive, reflecting some skepticism in the discussions. The variance in opinions showcases mixed feelings about the car’s overall design and history, particularly for enthusiasts who may prioritize original performance specifications.
 |
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its stunning build quality and unique features. @rpmf08 appreciates the beautiful color and impressive modifications like the exhaust and wing, while @GLWA,PAWHKY expresses excitement with a playful comment about the spoiler. Many commenters, including @MohrImports and @jimmyjrj, highlight the impressive transformation of the car, with @Ford_Fan531 noting the remarkable increase in value since its modifications. @pwpb2801 also emphasizes the vehicle's exclusive features, stating it possesses beauty, power, and remarkable engineering.
Neutral: Several comments provide an overview of the auction process and market value, with @Shemagra suggesting that aftermarket modifications may significantly enhance value, leading to interesting discussions. @ThrasherBear's analogy about transformation reflects shared amazement without diving deeply into the specifics of the build. Additionally, @scott_s and others mention the car's past and its current asking price, indicating varying perspectives on the market in comparison to other high-end builds like those by Singer.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about pricing and modifications. @BoltonBlue received a flag for being non-constructive, while @scott_s voiced a personal opinion that the car might not be worth more than a Singer, suggesting a divide in how potential buyers perceive value. @1lotus1 humorously states a previously held belief against buying repainted vehicles, hinting at changes in sentiments due to this specific build. Overall, while many praise the vehicle, there are undercurrents of cautious appraisal regarding its value and modifications.
|
 |
Positive: @bmstaudy describes the vehicle as something "truly special," while @ClassicJack123 expresses excitement, saying, "Give me the car!" @67vettesw believes it's going to be a "big money car," and @C3Lee echoes the sentiment about high value. @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN (The Seller) provides context about the car's significant history as a 1953 Chevrolet Corvette, mentioning its impressive awards and the legacy of its previous owner, John Kennedy. @taosman54 appreciates the quality of the restoration, suggesting it was done with respect to originality. Overall, commenters emphasize the car's unique heritage and collector value.
Neutral: Several commenters provide insights into the car's design features and historical significance. @Lewis discusses the fit and finish of the body panels, referencing how Chrysler studied the vehicle for its assembly standards. @Guido36 mentions that the wraparound windshield inspired other automotive designs, while @PSFarm notes the evolution of style seen in the car’s dashboard compared to future models. @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN (The Seller) highlights that the car debuted as part of GM's Motorama in 1953, indicating its importance in automotive history.
Negative: Critics have pointed out issues and questions surrounding the car. @jeller6750 relates a story about a friend who restored a similar model and then kept it idle due to its value and condition. @customryder raises concern about whether the car should be restored or kept in its current state. @RichardPrince notes misconceptions about the vehicle's production intent, disputing the idea that it was only produced due to public demand. @zakk5 comments on the air cleaners being installed incorrectly, which could suggest a lack of attention in some areas. These remarks reflect a cautious approach, emphasizing both preservation and authenticity challenges.
|
26-Years-Owned 1988 Ford Mustang ASC McLaren Convertible 5-Speed
1FABP40E9JF279489
Lot 238103
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its unique styling and mechanical readiness. @Purpleman noted that the owner has it ready for the next owner, while @Gk944 called the ASC McLaren a 'beautiful fox.' @2caddiesandaMach1 mentioned that it looks far superior to factory convertible models, both with the top up and down. Commenters such as @eddieames and @996sthelens reminisced about their experiences with past ASCs, appreciating the distinctive body lines and features like the hidden coolers instead of a backseat. Positive sentiments were further echoed by @Acorn19, who described the car as 'quite sweet.'
Neutral: Some comments provided informative context about the car without expressing strong opinions. @Adawson discussed the aftermarket conversion choice, noting that a soft top was available from the factory. @WordMan shared insights about the ASC/McLaren's unique features, such as the laid-back windshield and absence of a backseat. @shel_boss (The Seller) confirmed details regarding the vehicle's specifications, including the rarity of the manual transmission models and the unique windshield rake. Also, @Hollant raised the idea of restomodding, suggesting upgrades and confirming that replacement tops are available from specific manufacturers.
Negative: On the downside, some comments reflected concerns about the vehicle's condition. @funmoneypit questioned if the car had been exposed to harsh conditions, suggesting potential damage to the interior. @dmose emphasized that very few ASC Verts came with a manual transmission, hinting at the rarity and possibly lowering its desirability. Additionally, the need for upgrades or restomodding was mentioned, with @Hollant asserting that it could benefit from a substantial overhaul. Overall, while the car has a dedicated fanbase, concerns about its wear and age were noted.
|
White Gold Metallic 1992 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 Cabriolet 5-Speed
WP0CB2967NS460309
Lot 238105
Dealer
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its unique Paint to Sample color, White Gold Metallic, and the overall aesthetic appeal captured in the photography, with @Frankieballs noting the "AMAZING photography @seller!" @Caddy80 mentioned that it has numerous desirable features, including a top-end rebuild, a new top, and sport seats. The consensus among enthusiasts, such as @GaryJR and @kmarku, is that the 964 and 993 model 911s are among the best in terms of design and driving experience, with @GaryJR reminiscing about his own ownership of a related model, confirming their quality and appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @nweuro, provided detailed insights about the car's specifications, including its history and recent enhancements. They described the vehicle's factory specifications as highly desirable, such as Full Leather and Limited Slip Differential, and mentioned that it is not a typical 964 due to its special color and factory options. The seller also addressed comments from prospective buyers regarding the car's condition, confirming the recent top-end rebuild and providing information about any minor issues, like scratches on the windshield, along with assurances of the vehicle's excellent presentation overall.
Negative: A few comments touched on potential concerns, such as @DriveMyCar's inquiry about scratches on the windshield and the absence of an under-hood option tag. While @nweuro confirmed the presence of some minor scratches, they reassured that these issues are relatively minor. @Frankieballs expressed curiosity about whether the car still had its old VA vanity plate, indicating some uncertainty regarding its history. Despite these concerns, the overall sentiment remains positive, with no significant complaints about the vehicle’s performance or condition.
|
 |
Positive: @GDogg describes the XJS V12 coupe in Antelope as magnificent, mentioning how the color looks fantastic in the sun. @socalmugu appreciates the stunning shade of tan, comparing the car to a classic LV purse and recalling glamorous supermodels of the 80s. @Tom_S. finds the XJ-S beautiful, particularly highlighting the delicate shift lever, while @Firtich attests to the car's cleanliness, expressing optimism for the new owner. @jrb007 praises the seller for enjoying the car and being a good steward, and @Christmo admires the 26,000 miles the seller has driven in four years, showcasing the smooth performance of its V12 engine.
Neutral: @SantoTorini, the seller, acknowledges the positive feedback and clarifies that the car, while not perfect, is clean and has been diligently maintained with significant investment over four years. @Ljones95 notes that the 1986 model represents a sweet spot for the XJ-S due to its matured design and quality improvements. There are mentions of how the car's mechanical issues have mostly been addressed and the importance of keeping classic Jaguars well-maintained, with @socalmugu highlighting the quality of work from a reputable Jaguar shop.
Negative: @Chops expresses a concern by asking if a cylinder compression test has been performed and if the car burns oil, hinting at some apprehension regarding the car's mechanical state. @SantoTorini responds that while there hasn't been a compression test, the car is reported to run strong with minimal oil seepage. Despite reassuring comments, there is an underlying uncertainty, suggesting that potential buyers should remain cautious about the car's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: The comments celebrate the C20 truck's beautiful restoration and the appealing medium olive green two-tone color scheme, which many find eye-catching. @JNorVintage (The Seller) expresses excitement about the auction and reflects on the truck's unique history, being a one-owner vehicle with only 88,000 miles. Other commenters like @RWB_AZ compliment its stunning restoration and were impressed with the features, including the working air conditioning that was converted to R134, and the stylish custom deluxe trim. Enthusiastic responses from users such as @Sandcruiser and @s_fitz reveal that classic trucks like this often draw attention and admiration at car shows and public outings. Furthermore, @allmeads appreciates the way the olive green contrasts beautifully with the white accents, enhancing the truck's overall aesthetics.
Neutral: Several commenters shared their experiences and thoughts related to classic C20 trucks. @Tomcat describes his own C20 and mentions its original condition while noting the civilized character of these vehicles compared to earlier models. @Nifski raised questions about the truck's undercarriage condition, querying about potential surface rust, indicating a level of concern but also curiosity about the restoration process. @tidmack and @1150EML discussed custom seat covers for the truck, highlighting a common interest among C20 enthusiasts regarding maintenance and restoration specifics.
Negative: Concerns stem from @Nifski's observations about potential rust and grime on the truck's undercarriage, questioning if it has seen any harsh weather or if it was left in original condition. This raised issues about the truck's quality post-restoration, suggesting that some may find the visible wear surprising given the mileage since its restoration. Additionally, one commenter noted the unusual tire choice, questioning its suitability for the truck, which could imply it might not be the best setup for varied driving conditions. These points highlight the necessity for prospective buyers to consider the maintenance and potential hidden flaws in the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @jcmc97 praised the vehicle's startup video and expressed excitement about the sounds it produces, comparing it to their 2018 Demon, while @theYellowCarGuy expressed a strong desire for the vehicle after watching the WOT portion of a video. @gzipin shared an enthusiastic experience after inspecting the car, describing it as stunning and well taken care of, expressing hope to win the auction. Additionally, @Longmire45 complimented the unique color and referred to the vehicle as close to replicating 'jet-like thrust' on the ground, further highlighting the admiration for the vehicle's special features.
Neutral: @bschneids83 requested a cold start video, to which @JetPilot88 confirmed they would upload one later. @Adam54 asked about the seller's mechanical qualifications and the car's history, including air suspension performance. @markno inquired about track times, and @squarehead asked whether factory replaced parts were available, both of which the seller clarified positively. @AyeAron asked if there are any liens on the vehicle and received confirmation from @JetPilot88 that the title was free and clear.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism or concern, such as @cpecos questioning routine maintenance practices given the low mileage, including oil changes and battery replacements. @Adam54's inquiry about the car's history also hinted at possible apprehension regarding its off-road use and air suspension performance. Furthermore, although there were numerous positive sentiments towards the vehicle, the comments did not highlight any overt negative experiences reported by other users.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as a "beauty" and "classy and athletic." @ExcelloM1 and @Craven both highlight its aesthetic appeal, with @Discobob adding that it is a "ruby red gem." @timwig shares a personal connection, stating that their own '93 model is among their favorites, emphasizing the car's desirability. @ZR1ZR1ZR1 appreciates the presentation and completeness of the car, noting it has substantial original features that enhance its allure.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions regarding specific features and historical aspects of the vehicle, indicating a general interest in its specifications. @jecmotorsports inquires about the key fobs that accompany the car, acknowledging the varying reports about their numbers. @jb987 asks about the low tire pressure monitoring system, which @pirateat70 (The Seller) responds to with the best information they have, although they are unable to provide a definitive answer. This illustrates the potential buyers' curiosity about the vehicle's condition and functionalities.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by potential buyers, such as the absence of a functioning key fob as mentioned by @pirateat70 (The Seller). They acknowledge the need for re-syncing since the battery was replaced. Additionally, @taz178 points out the importance of having the fender badge for the vehicle, hinting that without it, the car may not hold the same value. @jb987 also seeks assurance about the tire pressure monitoring system, reflecting apprehension regarding the car's operational aspects.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm for the 2014 Porsche Panamera Turbo's performance and luxury features. @Euro_Classica (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's powerful twin-turbocharged V8 engine, smooth ride, and high-end interior, while stating that it provides incredible value for its performance. @ageslurkin noted the car's capability and encouraged those who are handy to consider it as a fun third vehicle, especially despite its history of accidents.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the car. @Zingaro1 asked about the top type, and @whitedon1 inquired about potential leaks in the air struts and suspension system. @MCTECH also requested more information on the wing's positions, emphasizing a need for additional visuals, which @Euro_Classica responded to by sharing videos of the car's cold start and interior walkthrough.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's accident history and its impact on value. @4camfan1 expressed disappointment over the demolition derby background, while @Hutson pointed out the impact of the minor and severe accidents on pricing. @globaldiver requested more transparency about the "severe damage" mentioned in the car's history and repairs made, while @brokencent echoed these concerns about the damages and non-matching tires, seeking further clarification from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Land Cruiser. @E911 noted it was a "great looking 200," highlighting the vehicle’s ruggedness and intended purpose for outdoor adventures. @CRUSH complimented the vehicle's "nice touch with the heritage wheels," while @ChadFromBendOregon described it as a "nice rig," showing overall appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and performance attributes. Furthermore, @SparksClassic appreciated the seller's transparency in addressing questions, indicating trust and confidence in the bidding process.
Neutral: The seller, @BigTex2026, provided clarity on several queries regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition. He confirmed that the service work has been performed by him and his family, assuring potential buyers of the care taken with the Land Cruiser. @jpassana and @sndvs posed multiple technical questions about vehicle modifications, service history, and repairs, reflecting a thorough consideration by interested buyers rather than any issues with the vehicle itself. The seller's willingness to accommodate pre-purchase inspections and to answer questions reflects a proactive approach to the sale.
Negative: Some comments suggested concerns about the vehicle's service history and specific replacements. @sndvs requested detailed information regarding the upper control arms, original OEM parts, and service records after September 2023, which indicate a level of uncertainty among potential bidders regarding the vehicle's maintenance. Additionally, the need for clarity on whether the alignment was checked, and uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's mileage incurred during ownership raised red flags for some buyers. These factors might affect buyer confidence despite the seller’s efforts to address concerns.
|
 |
Positive: @NJNewb and @boaboyoz both praised the vehicle, highlighting its awesome build and stating it's 'straight cash'. @MontanaBroncos expressed enthusiasm for the idea of having a manual transmission in the Bronco, while @SummerSolstice complimented the visual appeal of the truck. Collectively, these comments underline the overall admiration for the Bronco's design and modifications, suggesting a strong positive impression from prospective buyers.
Neutral: @socalclassiccarstorage introduces himself as the representative of the seller, expressing willingness to answer questions about the Bronco and offering updates about specific queries from other users. There are discussions about the vehicle's features and specifications including the Alpine stereo's location and transmission types, reflecting a mix of genuine interest and engagement from potential buyers looking for detailed information.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle's shifting capabilities, particularly from @3metax, who noted it seemed tough to get into 1st and 2nd gear during a driving video. @3metax also inquired about the discrepancies between the build sheet and the current specifications of the Bronco, specifically addressing the change from automatic to manual transmission and highlighting a lack of communication on some queries with @Bulldog90 mentioning unanswered questions through BAT. Such comments suggest potential issues that could dissuade buyers or require further clarification from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle. @LongDucDong referred to the AE86 as a 'beauty' and hoped it would fetch a good price for the seller, calling it a long-lost gem. @Ischultzie showed support for the seller, wishing them luck in achieving their desired price in the relisted auction. The overall enthusiasm from the community highlights a shared appreciation for this car and its value.
Neutral: The conversation around the vehicle noted that it was being relisted after not hitting its reserve price in a previous auction. @Mikewagon questioned the reason for the quick sale after a month, and @Anthonyma clarified the situation, explaining that it appears the reserve was not met. @AE86owner87 (The Seller) confirmed that there have been no changes to the vehicle since the last listing aside from added mileage and provided updates on the inclusion of extra parts, responding to inquiries from the commenters.
Negative: Some comments indicate a level of skepticism about the auction's success. @Mikewagon's initial reaction questioned the seller's motives, and while @Anthonyma clarified the situation, there’s an underlying concern about why the vehicle is being sold again so soon. Additionally, @Jags_in_the_barn expressed interest in the original engine, which hints at potential issues with the car's current setup or restoration journey.
|
 |
Positive: @Practical_Chicken expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a beauty, and noted the owner's proximity, indicating interest in viewing it. @charlie79 commented on the car's appearance, highlighting that it appears to have been well cared for and garage kept, suggesting minimal rust. @laichzeit (The Seller) confirmed that the car had been fully maintained by Mercedes-Benz, ensuring all services are up to date and well-documented, which adds to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @laichzeit (The Seller) provided detailed responses to queries about the vehicle's multi-contour front seats and soft top operation. The seller confirmed that the multi-contour features on both sides of the front seats work well and that the soft top operates smoothly without leaks, except for a missing gasket around the bootlit. @charlie79 also inquired about the gas usage, and the seller verified that premium fuel was consistently used, further reassuring potential bidders about the car's maintenance.
Negative: @Msprofit raised concerns about the high mileage of the vehicle, questioning how much might be left for future use. @Jaq55 asked specifically about potential tears in the fabric intake tubes, a common issue in similar vehicles, indicating a concern about wear and tear. Additionally, @Crystaledge questioned the vehicle's capability to pass an Ontario safety check that will change in the future, suggesting apprehension about compliance with safety regulations.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed confidence in the vehicle's condition, especially with @korbonits stating that the 360 Spider is in phenomenal shape and urging others to bid confidently. @GT1942, the seller, reinforced this by mentioning that the car has been well-maintained by the same owner since 2009, indicating that mileage is not a concern for a vehicle that has had proper care. Furthermore, @GT1942 provided reassuring examples of other high-mileage cars feeling more powerful, suggesting that this particular model is also in excellent condition.
Neutral: Comments regarding mileage were a point of discussion, particularly @astonman76 questioning how the market would respond to the vehicle's mileage. @rbarzakay mentioned a preference for drivers over garage-queens, indicating that a clean service history can outweigh concerns over odometer readings. There were inquiries about the vehicle's maintenance, such as the timing belt service done in 2022 and the condition of the clutch, both of which @GT1942 addressed directly, showcasing transparency from the seller.
Negative: Some potential concerns were raised about the vehicle as well. @raykosh pointed out the price of the car, questioning if it was reasonable for a vehicle of its age and model, noting that it might not be a collector's item. Questions were also raised regarding the ball joints and a potential check engine light, though @GT1942 clarified that the ball joints were inspected and in good condition and that the light indication was normal for the ignition position. Overall, while there are concerns, the seller's reassurances seem to alleviate some of the negativity.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a generally positive sentiment about the vehicle. @SunKissedImportsFLORIDA (The Seller) emphasizes that the truck is in excellent condition, stating it has 'zero' issues with the air suspension and encouraging potential buyers to check the CARFAX for its service records. The seller expresses pride in their selection process for the auction and reassures customers of their positive business practices, mentioning high-quality maintenance of vehicles sourced from Naples, where they claim the clientele tends to take exceptional care of their cars. There's also an active engagement in offering transport quotes and providing updates on inquiries, suggesting a readiness to assist buyers.
Neutral: Some comments reflect neutral inquiries regarding specific details of the vehicle. @RS60Spyder raises a question about potential issues with the air suspension, while @joeybenz queries about the presence of a window sticker and the condition of the paint on the vehicle given its mileage. @dthompsonrts11 also asks for clarification on the CARFAX report regarding the vehicle's sale history. @PhantomMensa's request for transport quotes reflects a practical concern, and the seller responds promptly to all such inquiries, which keeps the conversation informative but essential rather than emotional.
Negative: Negative sentiments are not strongly represented, but some concerns arise regarding the condition of the vehicle. @Joeybenz expresses skepticism over the vehicle's paint condition due to its mileage and requests details about any repainting or chips on the hood. @dthompsonrts11's inquiry about the tire tread level indicates a potential concern for performance. @Joeybenz also anticipates possible cosmetic issues associated with a vehicle of this age, although @SunKissedImportsFLORIDA reassures them by confirming the lack of repaint and only minor blemishes on the body, highlighting that while there are minor imperfections, the overall quality remains high.
|
 |
Positive: @Indythompson expressed excitement about selling his 2005 C6 Corvette, mentioning past positive experiences on BAT and noting that this vehicle has been a step towards owning a C7 Z51 Manual. He highlighted that the car has been well taken care of and maintained, sharing his personal satisfaction after driving it 2000 miles without incident. Additionally, @curtis-w commented on the quality appearance of the car, while @Viper0311 suggested it could make a great daily driver for the right price.
Neutral: @notlikelytowin4 asked about the car's history under previous owners, and @deadbugdoug inquired about potential discrepancies in the VIN numbers. @Indythompson responded to these queries, acknowledging the VIN issue and speculating that the glovebox cover may have been replaced at some point. He encouraged potential buyers to reach out with any questions, indicating his willingness to provide transparency and information about the car.
Negative: @SVXRide humorously pointed out the concerns surrounding the stock harmonic balancer when it broke, reflecting some past issues the vehicle has faced. @Indythompson mentioned the unfortunate experience of having to replace both the harmonic balancer and radiator after hearing clunking noises, which raises questions about the vehicle's reliability prior to his ownership. Overall, while the car has showcased some maintenance challenges, he assures potential buyers of its current solid condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors praised the vehicle's aesthetics and performance, highlighting comments like @boaboyoz calling it a "Gentian Blue Metallic magic" and @grandpaG5 sharing their exhilarating experience with a similar model. The @The_Dude_Abides, the seller, emphasized the car's original owner and its well-cared-for condition, further noting its detailed service records and recent upgrades such as the Soul Performance tune that increases power significantly. Many felt confident in the vehicle's overall craftsmanship, with @ICE_in_my_veins expressing excitement about its sporty exhaust and inviting confidence in the sale (GLWTA!).
Neutral: Various inquiries were made regarding the car's historical service details and specifications, suggesting a level of interest in understanding prior usage. Commentors like @seth4man and @mjhermjher requested more information about the tune performance and the tire date codes. Additionally, @Novawagon2 asked about front ground clearance, illustrating the attention to specifics potential buyers are keen to ascertain regarding vehicle capabilities and modifications.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's service history. The @IDDQDs pointed out discrepancies in the Carfax report, asking for clarification on ownership changes and service intervals. @amato8911 questioned whether the tune affected emissions inspections, indicating potential worries about compliance in states like Georgia. Overall, while the seller presented a strong case for the car's quality and performance, there remained caution among some prospective buyers about its maintenance and potential ramifications of modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle, calling it a beauty and a potential collector's item. @fannyfoodle expressed excitement about the listing, while @palliewaulie highlighted its collector's status. Other users like @ptrem and @thecritic praised the vehicle's appearance and speculated that it could be another record-breaker in the market. Additionally, @tigers196884 provided various aesthetic endorsements, emphasizing the vehicle's classic appeal in different configurations.
Neutral: Several questions were raised about the vehicle, particularly regarding its title and condition. @cjboom asked for specific details about the vehicle's title and any potential issues, while @fernandinabill inquired about tire sensors and lock actuators. In response, @777cfc, the seller, clarified that there were no significant problems with the vehicle, attributing some minor tire pressure light issues to cold weather. He reassured potential buyers about the vehicle's cleanliness and overall quality.
Negative: A few comments hinted at skepticism regarding the seller's intentions, with @cjboom questioning the quick turnaround for the sale, implying a potential issue with the vehicle. @damaho912 added that the description does not necessarily qualify as a "quick flip," suggesting concerns about the seller's motives. Overall, while there is a lot of positivity surrounding the vehicle, there are cautious inquiries that reflect some buyer apprehension.
|
 |
Positive: @Rocket-Head912 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting he likes it. @bennymax, the seller, confirmed that the car runs and has been driven, specifically mentioning participation in Rod Run in East TN over the past few years. He has provided additional information about the engine, noting that it's a 402ci, sharing engine block numbers and confirming the car's overall good condition, with minimal rust as it has been well cared for since being garage kept in Tennessee.
Neutral: There was a lot of interest in specific technical details about the car from various commentors. @lrdvdr41 and @Moepoe asked for engine block pad stamp pictures and more details regarding components like the rear-end ratio and if the 454 block was a 2-bolt or 4-bolt main. @tmicallef acknowledged @bennymax's updates with additional comments concerning the car's components and emphasized the need for more detailed photographs. Furthermore, it was suggested that @bennymax share more identification markers related to the vehicle's authenticity and to explore the potential of the original engine and drivetrain's value in the market.
Negative: Some commenters voiced skepticism about the car's authenticity and modifications. @johnny0620 questioned the validity of the seller's claims regarding the car being a true SS model and suggested that the seller conduct more research. @hairyolds noted concerns about missing components and modifications that could affect value. @gtg082y pointed out the potential functionality issues with the factory tach and speedometer, further questioning the overall reliability of the vehicle. Additionally, @IBE555666 expressed concerns about the car's condition, specifically rust related to the rear quarters.
|
 |
Positive: @Polska described the car as beautiful, though expressing practical concerns about modifications related to the driver's seating. @packardv8 praised the extensive modifications, especially the engine upgrade, indicating that a similar version built by them had elevated performance. @Bullypit and @Ragsteve added insights regarding the desirability of seeing multiple models listed on BaT, suggesting different audience interest based on modifications, while recognizing the car's impressive appeal and modifications.
Neutral: Comments from @cleister (The Seller) provided useful context about the car's history and modifications, sharing certification efforts and details about the restoration process. @austinhealer pointed out discrepancies regarding the VIN tag rivets, suggesting the need for further review for authenticity, while @Warren highlighted specific details that might differentiate the car from others, reinforcing the need for scrutiny.
Negative: Concerns about the roll bar's engineering were raised by @Polska and @StMiguel, with @A63LeMans reminiscing about the car's past and expressing disappointment over modifications made by subsequent owners. @crazy4cars mentioned mixed feelings about the restoration quality, noting the less-than-perfect execution of engine compartment details. @Bullypit criticized the BaT listing process, questioning the effectiveness of having multiple similar cars for sale simultaneously, indicating frustration within the seller community.
|
 |
Positive: @Genes409 praised the car, calling it a very nice car and expressed a wish to be in the market for it. @rickaz also appreciated the build quality, referencing a slang term for hot rods that he feels is fitting for this vehicle. @assphaltranger complimented the car’s beauty despite asking a technical question about its design.
Neutral: @mbrandonmotorcars (The Seller) engaged with potential buyers by providing thorough answers to their inquiries. He mentioned the availability of the car for inspection, clarified the status of the hood panels, and shared technical specifications about the engine. Multiple comments from potential buyers discussed logistical details regarding inspections and casting numbers, reflecting interest in the technical aspects of the car.
Negative: @gatzkers raised concern over potential scratches on the hood and @Greybeard2 noted that the red velour interior might not be suitable for the car. @Love2cycle pointed out a potential ergonomic issue with the steering column positioning, while @JoeB2541 made requests for additional specific details about the engine, indicating that some key information was not immediately accessible.
|
 |
Positive: @GBRBiLL thinks the Defender is an authentic and honest vehicle, commenting positively on its sourcing from Italy, which is renowned for rust-free Defenders. @Buyrovers appreciates the truck's overall appeal, labeling it an "awesome truck" and showing enthusiasm about the accompanying barn. Additionally, @WebsterMotorCo (The Seller) showcases the Defender's utilitarian design, highlighting its well-maintained condition and readiness for its next owner to enjoy.
Neutral: Various members, including @DocWilly84 and @Jordanmix, inquire about specific details such as the vehicle's cold start performance, towing capacity, and the resolution of previous electrical issues related to oil leaks. @WAGONBOYTD expresses concern about the potential persistence of the oil leak affecting the wiring harness, suggesting that this may lead to further complications. Other users also seek clarification regarding additional videos and documentation to understand the vehicle's condition better.
Negative: Concerns about the Defender's oil leak and its impact on electrical components are raised by @Pasatiempo and @WAGONBOYTD, who emphasize that this could be a long-term issue if not properly addressed. @jacktrades771 elaborates on the technical difficulties associated with the Td5 model, detailing how the oil infiltration into the wiring harness can lead to ongoing electrical problems. This suggests that, despite the appealing exterior and history of the vehicle, significant mechanical challenges may lie ahead for future owners.
|
 |
Positive: @amotorsports (The Seller) highlights the Jeep Wrangler's well-maintained condition, noting it has low mileage and new tires while also praising the standout color. @gdspc agrees, mentioning that it is a great color and emphasizing the improvements in the later model interiors and engine performance. @01996tt also admires the refreshing exterior color, calling the JK great-looking, which adds to the positive sentiment about its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: The discussions involve various aspects of the Jeep Wrangler. @redfish28's query about the soft top's noise levels indicates a consideration for potential buyers who might be interested in the configuration of the vehicle. @amotorsports (The Seller) responds with assurance about the quality of the soft top and its sound insulation properties, suggesting a balance between functionality and design in the Jeep's features.
Negative: @jeepmike expresses concerns regarding the early JKU models, specifically mentioning the underpowered 3.8 engine and dated interior aesthetics, which may be a drawback for some potential buyers. Despite this, he still believes that the vehicle could be a good option for a teenager with lighter driving needs, given its affordability in the Jeep marketplace.
|
 |
Positive: @jwcrowell described the GTS as beautifully done and a nice example, while @sabmiami (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's quality and performance during the presentation. @LawDog acknowledged the cool build and appreciated the detailed mechanical questions posed, which indicate thorough consideration of the vehicle's attributes. @Nyx1015 found the cold start of the vehicle particularly impressive and believed it could be driven for long distances without issue, adding a positive note to the vehicle's reliability and charm. @leftlane11 reinforced confidence in the model's durability and reliability based on their experience with a similar vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on the vehicle's specifics, including whether the GTS had used off-road and its handling abilities. @Puravidatlc requested information on the GTS's off-road history, while @jwcrowell inquired about the build sheet from Cruisin Gold. @GMcDaniel86 raised concerns about a leak seen in the video, which was explained by @sabmiami as condensation from the A/C. @campodf noted the potential for confusion created by embedded tire ads, emphasizing that the vehicle does not need new tires, depicting the necessity for clarity amid the promotional context.
Negative: Some commenters expressed dissatisfaction with aspects of the vehicle listing. @campodf criticized Bring a Trailer for their advertising practices, suggesting it may mislead potential buyers, and hinted at being reconsidered as a user of the platform. @CowboyAction raised concern about the timing chain's status without concrete assessment information, while @campodf even dismissed CowboyAction’s comments as spam. @kasperville questioned whether the vehicle has been inspected recently, underscoring skepticism about ongoing maintenance. Despite these critiques, the broader sentiments included appreciation for the GTS itself.
|
 |
Positive: The overall consensus regarding the 1963 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Split-Window Coupe is positive, with many users praising its aesthetic appeal and performance features. @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN highlights the car's impressive history and engineering advancements, such as the 327 cubic inch V8 engine and an all-new frame design that significantly improved its handling and ride quality. @GasMonkeyGarage, who has owned the car twice, emphasizes its reliability and comfort for driving, along with the convenience of having air conditioning.
Neutral: Several comments focus on clarifying details regarding the car's engine specifications and condition. @Fisher99 questions the conflicting descriptions of the engine, which @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN addresses by confirming it actually has a Chevy 350 engine. There are inquiries about the car's builder history and physical condition, such as @Jakeintexas asking if there are any previous repairs or damage, to which @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN assures that the car exhibits no issues.
Negative: A few users express doubts about the car's value and condition. @Hellscoot suggests it has little collector value despite being a nice driver, while @oaibob notes concerns about the car's originality and mentions overheating issues observed in a video. @Bmarcum brings up potential muffler problems, stating that the exhaust sounds like it has issues, although @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN responds with reassurances about the exhaust's condition. Overall, the comments reflect a spectrum of opinions ranging from admiration to skepticism.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments emphasize the positive visual appeal of the vehicle, with @Nachtsturm expressing admiration for the XC70's looks, stating it surpasses typical crossovers. @MuShuPork appreciates the description of the services done, while @JS123 (The Seller) highlights recent maintenance, including an alignment check and four new tires. The seller is actively engaging, offering to provide additional photos and addressing questions promptly, which contributes to a sense of transparency and readiness to assist potential buyers.
Neutral: There are several neutral remarks regarding the vehicle's inspection and service history. @BENZach questions the apprehension around sharing the Lemon Squad inspection, suggesting that @JS123 (The Seller) should have easy access to it. @grwasserman6242 points out that the limited service records could indicate potential issues, particularly with seals and hoses after sitting for long periods. This highlights a common concern among bidders while @JS123 responds with offers for further inspections and more details about the vehicle to assuage these concerns.
Negative: Some comments raise cautionary concerns about the vehicle. @grwasserman6242 expresses worry about the scarcity of service records and the vehicle potentially having sat unused, hinting this might lead to issues. @240steel notes a loud thud in driving videos, prompting follow-up questions from @Jose_in_AZ regarding the noise, which @JS123 claims is likely just road noise. Furthermore, @1995impalass inquiries about the remote starter feature, to which @JS123 confirms it is not equipped, further indicating some limitations of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Al45 described the vehicle as a beautiful car, while @GLWA,boaboyoz called the Star Chief a wonderful example, appreciating its condition. @Dollycat3 echoed these sentiments, referring to the convertible coupe as absolutely fabulous, highlighting its stunning color combination and gorgeous interior. @Longmire45 added that it has a groovy look and praised the rare color combo, along with its overall presentation as a piece of art.
Neutral: @GuysWithRides (The Seller) thanked the bidders and assured them that he would be available for questions. He also noted that he would address specific requests for videos, such as showing the manual window operation, which he later followed through on after taking the requested footage. @Pfeil and @neilpierson25 engaged in discussing variations of the color scheme, with @LW57 requesting additional images and details about the vehicle's undercarriage.
Negative: @LW57 expressed concerns about the lack of detailed pictures, particularly about the underside of the car, prompting requests for more documentation. @coolstuff also asked for full disclosure regarding what might not work on the car. Meanwhile, @Dmollica's comments were flagged as non-constructive, reflecting possible dissatisfaction with a past transaction, which @GuysWithRides (The Seller) felt needed addressing.
|
 |
Positive: @Strakes appreciates the Alpina body modifications and finds the vehicle to be an under-appreciated option in the freight train category. @Dspoljaric enjoys driving their 2007 Alpine on black, noting its sporty yet elegant characteristics and the rarity of the Alpine white color. @adwebinc loves the car in white, calling it one of their favorites of all time and noting that this one appears to be in great condition. @NeilC3 describes the vehicle as absolutely gorgeous, praising the sporty look of the SWB versions, and reminiscing about their own favorite car purchase from this type. @Moedrizzy (The Seller) emphasizes the immaculate condition of the car, with it being garage kept and non-smoking, and assures potential buyers of its increasing value.
Neutral: @Duke_Dallas points out a discrepancy in the listing details regarding the wheel size. @Moedrizzy (The Seller) clarifies that they obtained a bonded title from a dealership that closed shortly after selling the vehicle. They also explain the process of obtaining the bonded title to address concerns raised by @Neversaynever. @Moedrizzy (The Seller) shares information about the vehicle's service history, including that it comes with service records and two keys, and offers assistance with financing.
Negative: @rphdiego expresses skepticism about the Carfax evaluation, suggesting it might undervalue the car. @bigbucks420 mentions being offered only $7k for their trade-in despite having a relatively low mileage of 35k, implying dissatisfaction with the market's perception of value for these vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlight the appealing aspects of the 1974 Vespa 150 sport, with @v30t describing it as a "nice untouched original Vespa!" and @7x57 noting the owner's fun personality based on their driveway and garage appearances, while calling the Vespa beautiful. The seller, @basquesushi, provides extensive information through videos and photographs to assure potential buyers of the vehicle's condition, emphasizing transparency by inviting the community to correct any inaccuracies in his listing. This approach, combined with his humor, has added a premium to the auction experience, as mentioned by @PhilNiekro who appreciated the seller's sense of humor.
Neutral: The seller, @basquesushi, details the vehicle's condition and provides information about its features, such as the matching engine case numbers and the OEM rear tire rack. He also mentions the history of the Vespa, confirming that it is owned by a Montana resident and there will be no issues with registration or titling. Several videos are available, including a cold start demonstration on a cool day, showcasing the scooter's functionality and readiness to ride. Additionally, the offer of free storage until the end of June post-payment is a practical note for buyers.
Negative: A few comments point out minor issues with the Vespa, such as the missing reflector on the throttle side front fender, noted by @basquesushi. While the overall feedback is positive, these small details may concern some potential buyers. However, the seller acknowledges potential inaccuracies in the listing and is open to community input, suggesting a level of transparency that might alleviate worries about hidden problems.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal that many potential buyers think highly of the vehicle's condition and features. Notably, @alta4, the seller, describes the 2004 Honda Element LX 4WD as a fantastic, nearly new utility vehicle with a working air conditioning system, which is essential for the hot Savannah weather. @BMWE90Guy and @TVSPOTZ express their positive nostalgia and experiences with similar vehicles, highlighting their durability and suitability as a first car for new drivers.
Neutral: Some comments express curiosity and requests for additional details about the vehicle's history and condition. @jefferson790 and @buttesilverbow note the quick turnover of ownership while @Jusgw and @RandoJCommando inquire about the underside pictures and interior cleanliness, specifically regarding possible rodent damage. @syoder74 raises concerns about potential spray paint over corrosion, prompting @alta4 to reassure everyone of the vehicle's original state with paint meter readings and detailed explanations.
Negative: However, there are also questions and concerns flagged by potential buyers. @RandoJCommando is particularly apprehensive about the rodent damage and the request for usable interior pictures suggests a lack of trust. @fitisgo critiques the condition of the valve cover paint, hinting that it isn't as it should be, while @Jusgw initially requests more photographs, indicating that some buyers want more transparency about the vehicle's condition to feel comfortable in their purchasing decision.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is praised for its beautiful Sunset Orange Metallic color, with @WestMeadow expressing their affection for the color and wishing good luck with the auction (GLWTA). @jhutch33 highlighted the stunning appearance of the car, calling it absolutely stunning and noting it as the last year of an iconic model in the best color. Comments also reflect a general consensus on the car's condition, with @AirManFL complimenting the vehicle's overall aesthetic and offering repair solutions for common issues, while @Longmire45 reminisces about their fondness for Pontiac cars, indicating a strong emotional connection to the make.
Neutral: Multiple commenters shared detailed information about the vehicle's history and specifications, including @MidCitiesMildMan, who provided facts about its conversion numbers and rarity. @DV100mph, the seller, responded to inquiries about the vehicle's condition and past ownership. Specific inquiries about documented oil changes and extra pictures of the dash and undersides were made by @Mafear and @98WS6, indicating a desire for thorough transparency in the auction process. Additionally, discussions around the desirability of automatic transmissions were seen in comments from @lunchbocks2002 and @jamin87ss.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised, particularly regarding the common issue of bubbling sail panels and door cracks, which @jamin87ss noted as unavoidable for these car models. @98WS6 and @GJTT shared similar experiences with similar vehicle issues. @Nchiles inquired about any exterior visible flaws, amplifying concerns regarding the vehicle's overall condition despite positive remarks. @DV100mph confirmed that apart from the touched up mirror, there were no additional flaws, although the emphasis on such imperfections did linger throughout the comments.
|
 |
Positive: @jenmccracken (The Seller) mentioned that the car has a nice appearance, with only a small scratch on the boot, and all electrical components are functioning correctly. @nightraveler69 also described the automobile as good looking and expressed a curiosity about its low mileage, suggesting it could be a great vehicle for spring driving. Additionally, @Twobeagles highlighted that the car is being sold without reserve, appealing to potential buyers looking for a bargain.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle's condition and history were raised by potential buyers. @fplyon requested details about a past accident in 2009 and its impact on the car's condition, while @conroeclassics sought information on service history related to parts such as the timing belt and water pump. @muffyracer asked about the functionality of the cruise control, and @mwchristian requested a driving video and more about maintenance on the power top mechanism.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's title history and the seller's responses surfaced. @onepunch criticized the seller as a brand new account with multiple unanswered questions, questioning the reliability of the title information. Additionally, @onlyoriginalcars warned of potential issues passing SMOG inspection due to an illuminated alarm light, suggesting buyers conduct their own research to verify the vehicle's status.
|
 |
Positive: @mitchsolow (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a "stunning X6M!" and highlights that it is a "beast" with all services up to date. He notes that the next service is not due for another 7,000 miles, indicating the vehicle has been well maintained. @ULTMMMT adds a positive comment recalling their experience with a similar vehicle, referring to it as the "ULTIMATE driving machine" and mentioning the enjoyment of driving such a powerful car.
Neutral: @mitchsolow (The Seller) provides information regarding the vehicle's air conditioning system and its extended service contract coverage. He explains that regular maintenance, such as recharging the A/C, is not covered, but other potential issues could be. Comments from @LelandKaty and @araczynski raise concerns about the suspension height, to which @mitchsolow responds with reassurances about the vehicle's functional condition supported by recent service records.
Negative: @DSTC_Off expresses a concern about the air conditioning system, stating that they wouldn't be able to road trip without functioning A/C. Additionally, @LelandKaty questions the suspension height, suggesting it appears unusual, and @honkeyseal brings up a question about the lien process, hinting at potential complications in the sale. These points suggest some apprehensions regarding the vehicle's readiness for travel and financial logistics.
|
LS3-Powered 1996 Land Rover Defender 110 Pickup by Monarch Defender
SALLDHHF8TF819319
Lot 238136
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle, highlighting its spectacular appearance and impeccable build. @RalphsRovers expresses excitement, stating they have been keeping a close eye on it, while @boaboyoz describes it as a "delicious Defender" and compliments the build as "very cool." The Seller, @BlakeKK, adds that the vehicle is even better in person and mentions the unbeatable interior. @Flying4fish shares admiration for its gorgeous looks but expresses hesitance about using it for everyday tasks, like taking their dog for a ride. Overall, the general sentiment reflects genuine admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and build quality.
Neutral: Several comments touch on technical aspects and specific features of the vehicle. @Flying4fish inquires about the possibility of enabling tap shifting, a feature they have considered for their own Defender. The Seller, @BlakeKK, responds that they have not attempted it but agree it would be a cool feature. @WAGONBOYTD provides a detailed comment regarding the vehicle's classification, emphasizing its unique build and discussing the chassis history related to Otokar. Their analysis indicates that this vehicle appeals specifically to a niche market, suggesting that it might be intriguing to see where it lands in bidding.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about technical details and utility of the vehicle. @2hecknback questions the vehicle's towing capabilities, stating that the step bumper lacks necessary features for heavier towing. They also point out potential inaccuracies in the vehicle's classification, as they believe it is not built to the same standards as other models. @WAGONBOYTD attempts to clarify the confusion around the vehicle's classification but acknowledges the complications posed by custom builds in relation to Land Rover's typical processes. These remarks contribute a more critical perspective to the discussion, contrasting with the otherwise positive views on the vehicle's design.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praise the vehicle for its stunning condition and rarity. @pjh4064, the seller, expresses pride in offering the beautiful 1968 Mercury Cyclone Fastback GT, emphasizing its low mileage, original drivetrain, and the fact that it has never experienced rust. @McFood and @ArchSail highlight the Cyclone's visual appeal, noting its strong presence and unique design. @funkaholik appreciates the aesthetic, stating that the fastback models have a dynamic look that suggests motion even when stationary.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss specific technical aspects of the vehicle, including car parts and their history. @CarFoolLane provides insights into the carburetor included in the sale and its compatibility with the engine. @pjh4064, the seller, responds to queries about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, assuring potential buyers of its quality and originality. The interaction reflects a mix of curiosity and technical evaluation among the commenters, showcasing their investment in the car's details and mechanics.
Negative: There are a few concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @Cale8x and @Ozzybud question images that display potential issues, with @Ozzybud suggesting the presence of sealant or rust, while @Cale8x wonders about possible fiberglass or filler in vulnerable areas. @pjh4064 counters these claims, asserting there's no filler or sealant and explaining the appearance in photos. @mxrider302 asks about the engine’s history and the absence of the original radiator, though @pjh4064 reassures that the engine appears to remain in its original state without major rebuilds.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed high enthusiasm for the vehicle with remarks like @windnsea00's enthusiasm claiming, "Guy Fieri would love this," and @Sahm's exclamation, "Epic!!!!" @EC1 described it as "sweet," while others like @lynchmob561 showed their fandom with comments about loving SSRs. The overall impression from these comments suggests a strong appreciation for the unique features and aesthetic of the vehicle, creating a vibe of excitement and admiration.
Neutral: The seller, @OregonBoy, shared a personal story about the truck, describing how he purchased it for his father who loved driving it for errands before losing his driver's license due to health reasons. He notes that the truck has been well-maintained, always serviced, and kept in a garage. There were also inquiries about the vehicle's features, such as its CARB certification and details about modifications, showing a mix of general interest and the necessity for specific information regarding the vehicle's conformity to regulations.
Negative: Some concerns arose about the vehicle's compliance with emissions standards, highlighted by comments from @robertwichert and @Glenn930 asking for details about the CARB label and modifications, including the supercharger and exhaust system. @robertwichert requested more insights into non-stock items and their emissions testing capabilities, reflecting a cautious approach toward the vehicle's legality and performance. Additionally, @Ranfabmach questioned details about the flames, suggesting a level of skepticism about some aesthetic choices on the truck.
|
 |
Positive: @Doctornocarguy (The Seller) shared a positive experience from a recent car show, mentioning there were lots of positive comments and interest from onlookers regarding the vehicle. Additionally, @Doctornocarguy expressed appreciation for the help from @MikeFJCL, acknowledging the detailed research and explanation provided about the car's identification and model details. This highlights the vehicle's appeal and the enthusiasm it generates among viewers.
Neutral: @Doctornocarguy (The Seller) addressed some inquiries from potential buyers, including a question from @MikeFJCL regarding the absence of a model number on the identification plate. @Doctornocarguy explained that the model often remains unstamped due to how these cars were assembled and sold, particularly by Classic Motor Carriages (CMC). He also provided additional details about the car's history, including its chassis number from a 1970 Beetle, clarifying the documentation process in Pennsylvania.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @goodfire14 inquiring about a leak which @Doctornocarguy (The Seller) described as a very minor issue. Despite having replaced both the oil sump gasket and valve cover gaskets, @Doctornocarguy speculated that the leak could be from the oil sump, acknowledging that Volkswagens are known to have such issues. This minor leak might be a point of concern for potential buyers considering the overall condition of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @mike_rockwell praised the vehicle as one of the coolest-looking and well-executed Duster builds, highlighting its streetability and impressive performance. @Greenmachines1 noted that the car has a timeless appeal, making it look contemporary even nine years after its creation, and appreciated the tasteful retro interior design. @TCinLA and @GMTV_GIVEMETHEVIN both emphasized the builder's attention to detail, especially regarding the car's stance and fitment, which contribute to its eye-catching appearance.
Neutral: @parshooter commented on the uniqueness of using a 6.4-liter engine in this build, contrasting it with the more common 6.2 engines found in Hellcats and Demons, while @MoparSS raised a practical question regarding the transmission, inquiring about the feasibility of fitting a decent transmission without extensive modifications. @Nathankcf expressed curiosity about auto transmission recommendations, indicating active discussion about the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Some concerns were raised as @MoparSS questioned whether the transmission tunnel would need alterations to accommodate a better transmission, implying possible issues with the existing setup. This invites skepticism about the practicality and usability of the car beyond its impressive build and aesthetic appeal.
|
 |
Positive: @tojo92 commended the vehicle for its impressive upgrades, expressing admiration for the craftsmanship with a simple 'Very well done with nice upgrades.' @bmackrell shared enthusiasm for the build, calling it a 'very cool project' and wishing the seller good luck in the auction. @Shell3MPH echoed this sentiment, describing the bike as 'the coolest looking Kawasaki 1100 I’ve ever seen!' @MarlinMoto (The Seller) highlighted the bike's performance, stating, 'It runs great too!' and responding to queries with helpful information about the bike's features and specifications.
Neutral: Several comments focused on questions rather than strong opinions. @carstruck raised concerns about the kickstand's stability and asked about the quality of the tank paint, while @daveindian pointed out the engine's lean running condition but acknowledged the bike's overall condition. @Jonathan0 inquired about the presence of a kickstarter, sharing curiosity about the bike's mechanics. @krinkel reflected on a nostalgic experience with earlier models, noting the unique engine design of the ZR1100 and its history among Kawasaki's offerings, suggesting an appreciation for its heritage.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, some negative critiques emerged regarding the bike's blemishes. @Kzxpilot noted, 'What a beautiful bike, so bad about the blemishes,' and asked about specific details on the tank and side covers. @daveindian expressed concern, stating the bike 'looks to be running on the lean side.' The seller acknowledged these issues, explaining that there is a deep scratch on the tank and cracks in the sidecovers, which could diminish some buyers' interest.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have noted the original condition and drivability of the vehicle positively. @Mjcrawdaddy (The Seller) highlighted the Jimmy's original drivetrain that runs great, alongside good functioning trim pieces and a presence of intact elements like the top, which is often damaged by outdoor exposure. @Mjcrawdaddy (The Seller) also appreciated the positive feedback on the Jimmy being almost original and has added more visual content, including driving videos demonstrating its functionality, which seems to have impressed potential buyers.
Neutral: There are mundane inquiries regarding specific features of the vehicle. @jumper82 asked for photos of the underside of the doors and the backside of the rockers, indicating a desire for more detailed information. @paco2paco3 raised the question about the existence of a second gas tank, while @Stapescrew remarked on the lack of questions, suggesting the vehicle's almost original state is noteworthy. @Mjcrawdaddy (The Seller) responded to these queries promptly, illustrating a commitment to providing clarity to potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding minor operational features, particularly with a non-functioning blue light in the speedometer that typically illuminates for high beams, as stated by @Mjcrawdaddy (The Seller). Additionally, although the vehicle has had a saddle tank removed, it seems there is no significant issue raised regarding functionality, yet these aspects might deter some buyers looking for a fully original experience. Overall, the comments indicate that while the vehicle is in good shape, no major flaws are present, but the minor details could impact the perception for some investors.
|
 |
Positive: @PorscheNashua (The Seller) provided comprehensive information regarding the vehicle's condition and history, reassuring potential buyers about its Certified Pre-Owned status and the accompanying 2-year unlimited mileage warranty. Commenters like @bpesch appreciated the track-focused aspects of the car, noting the aftermarket brake pads replaced with factory ones, emphasizing its intended use as a performance vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific aspects of the vehicle, such as @RWL528 inquiring about the extent of damage on the passenger side and whether the door had been repaired or replaced. @Ktulu asked about the 'corrected' title, which @PorscheNashua clarified is typically due to clerical errors rather than indicating a bad title. Additionally, @PorscheNashua indicated that they would provide additional documentation and videos of the car's performance, demonstrating their commitment to transparency.
Negative: Some potential buyers expressed concerns over the presentation of the vehicle, with @fastcash21 suggesting that better photos could improve the listing quality, pointing out lighting issues that misrepresented the color. The state of the rotors was also questioned by @RWL528, creating doubts about the vehicle's maintenance. Overall, these inquiries raised caution flags about the vehicle's presentation and maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many users expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its impressive history and condition. @WAGONBOYTD noted that the truck is very fun and praised the important information provided by the MOT, especially for a vehicle of its age. @Valdivias_Garage mentioned the truck's character and detailed provenance, emphasizing that the next owner would appreciate this unique example. Additionally, @brynem shared a positive backstory about acquiring the truck from a private estate and noted minimal usage over the years, which adds to its charm.
Neutral: The seller, @ecartaya, provided detailed background information about the truck, sharing his own experiences with Land Rover vehicles and assuring potential buyers about the vehicle's condition. He also expressed a willingness to answer specific questions about the vehicle's features and even offered to show the truck via FaceTime. There was a discussion among users about vehicle tags and plate holders, with some users exchanging advice and relevant experiences without diverting into unrelated topics.
Negative: While most of the feedback was positive, there was a minor correction made by @2hecknback addressing the classification of the vehicle, mentioning that it is not a pickup but rather a Soft Top. This indicates potential misunderstandings regarding the vehicle's model. However, no major negative comments were recorded that could detract from the overall favorable impression of the truck.
|
 |
Positive: The comments from various enthusiasts reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle's quality and modifications. @GenauAutoWerks praised the stellar presentation by @the_patina_group, calling the car 'completely wicked!' Others, like @MrBonus, described the engine bay as a 'work of art' and highlighted its potential as a rally car. Multiple users expressed appreciation for the aesthetic details, particularly @katascopos who noted how the gold stripes on the black paint "shouldn’t work… but they do." The feedback indicates that the car has a significant visual presence and performs exceptionally well, with @the_patina_group confirming it runs strong and was dyno-tuned to 260whp, significantly higher than stock.
Neutral: Several users engaged in discussions about specific features and technical aspects of the car. Comments from @L041BUT and @Carrerachas expressed general positivity, with @L041BUT complimenting the overall execution. Questions were raised about technical specifications, such as engine performance indicators (@pjs911) and the brand of ITBs (@pjs911). This shows that potential buyers are interested in the detailed performance and engineering choices made during the car's restoration. The dialogue reflects a community interested in both the performance and craftsmanship of modern classic cars.
Negative: While the sentiment was mostly positive, there were a few critiques regarding minor details. @VWP-Nut pointed out that the windshield wipers were not identical, which reflects a concern for correctness in restoration. @C2Turbo and @Rushkar echoed this, noting that the wiper arms are swapped. Despite these critiques, they did not overshadow the overall effectiveness of the vehicle's presentation but highlighted areas where attention to detail could be improved.
|
 |
Positive: @EricYosick (The Seller) describes the car positively, pointing out that it starts clean from cold, settles into a smooth idle, and performs strongly through all gears. He further mentions that the clutch engagement is consistent without any slipping or chatter, and the transmission shifts cleanly. Additionally, he notes that the critical E36 areas of concern are solid, with no signs of damage, and that the vehicle is cosmetically in good condition, with minor imperfections consistent with its age. He expresses enjoyment in owning the M3, highlighting its engaging driving experience and inviting potential bidders to ask questions or request more photos.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @VN95037 and @Mcdermbp, are focused on specific features and functionality of the vehicle, such as the driver's seat wear and the functioning of the temperature controls. @EricYosick (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, providing a photo of the driver's seat and assuring that the temperature controls are functioning well, explaining the absence of a display in the pictures due to the fan being off. He promises to upload a photo to demonstrate the controls working, which reflects an effort to keep potential buyers informed and engaged with the vehicle's condition and features.
Negative: @TracksuitAL raises a concern regarding a brake light circuit failure issue that needs attention, describing it as inexpensive to fix but a hassle nonetheless. While @EricYosick (The Seller) does not directly address this specific issue, it indicates a point of caution for potential bidders regarding the car's upkeep. This suggests that while the overall state of the vehicle is well-maintained, there might be minor issues that could require attention, which could be perceived negatively by some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been celebrated for being a unique and special gift, particularly noted by @mhalloran who shared a touching story about receiving it from his wife during a factory visit. Commenters like @Caddisfly and @PandJ praised both the car's desirability, with low mileage and a strong year for the model, as well as the meaningful gesture of giving such an extraordinary birthday present. Many commentators appreciate the aesthetics of the car, with @BENTJAG complimenting its beautiful colors and @Bluesman888 highlighting the joy of driving it.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in friendly banter regarding the car, with @PandJ humorously mentioning the car's characteristics like understeer and joking about insurance claims. The discussion also included questions about the vehicle's graphics, with @sblackburn23 inquiring about whether they were under or over the clear coat, and @jefferson790 asking about potential damage when removing the graphics. The seller, @mhalloran, provided clarifications and shared that the graphics were indeed over the clear coat, maintaining the condition of the vehicle.
Negative: Comments also pointed to some hesitation about the vehicle's usability, particularly due to practical family considerations shared by @DonPanMan, who humorously joked about prioritizing children and car ownership. Some remarks suggested that while the current owner treasures the car, selling it for space and practicality reasons may not resonate well with every enthusiast, particularly @86Cab, who expressed a wish for a different color option and to see it without the graphics. A few comments noted concerns about the car's problematic reputation and overall practicality, suggesting a mixed sentiment towards owning such a unique vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @originalbob praised the car's stunning beauty, particularly admiring the way the exterior red highlights complement the red sparkplug wires. @anonymous8290 expressed enthusiasm for the paint scheme, calling it the best he has seen on a Factory Five. @1600veloce (The Seller) emphasized their commitment to quality, detailing their facilities and approach to selling cars, and highlighted the thorough information provided in their listings. @notlikelytowin4 described the car as beautiful, appreciating the aesthetics.
Neutral: @1600veloce confirmed that the vehicle is titled as a 2011 Asve MK4. Clarifications regarding the side pipes and stripes were provided to @Gussy, indicating that they are new and can be removed. The seller offered insights into the live video walkthroughs and encouraged interested parties to view the car by appointment. Additionally, the seller addressed inquiries about the vehicle's features and modifications, such as the engine bay vents and the concerns raised by multiple commenters about the rear wheel positioning, indicating that measurements showed the wheelbase was even.
Negative: There were concerns raised about potential discrepancies in the vehicle's construction. @Bmcamp questioned the authenticity between the Factory Five listing and the CT title, while @Gussy pointed out problems with the positioning of the side pipes, suggesting they could lead to burns. @Steveinthe925 expressed confusion regarding the installation of engine bay vents, while @SvenskiNM and @LVMYASP highlighted possible alignment issues with the rear wheels, raising doubts about the building quality, as seconding @JKleiner's experiences with similar past issues. Overall, there were reservations regarding mechanical aspects and the car's overall construction quality.
|
 |
Positive: @2quik6 praised the vehicle's gorgeous color combination, expressing admiration with a positive remark. @Scott68GTO contributed their appreciation for the features, highlighting the appeal of a big block paired with a 4-speed transmission. @selizald and @ogglodyte both shared a fondness for the luggage rack, with @selizald mentioning the torque as exciting and @ogglodyte recalling their own experience with a similar vehicle, stating the rack adds practicality for storage during trips. Overall, several commenters expressed that the car is visually stunning, calling it beautiful and emphasizing its appealing design elements.
Neutral: @gccch noted technical aspects of the vehicle, suggesting that a close ratio transmission should be paired with a certain rear axle ratio, along with questions regarding the availability of air conditioning in the model. @SellingDadsCollection responded to queries about the car's condition, assuring that the birdcage is solid and addressed concerns about the floor repair, clarifying that the heat shields were factory-installed. @Irah added a perspective on the luggage rack, suggesting it visually complements the car, even while wishing for additional features like a black soft top. This neutral commentary reflects both appreciation and inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and maintenance.
Negative: @Noisyboyz and @C3Lee shared frustrations about the luggage rack, expressing that it is not suitable for a sports car, with @C3Lee commenting on the possibility of filling the holes if desired. @sherako raised concerns about the car's mechanical condition, inquiring about potential issues like leaks or unusual noises coming from the engine. Furthermore, @Irah pointed out the presence of oil on the exhaust, questioning if it stemmed from a rear main seal leak or a sloppy oil change. These negative comments highlight areas of concern regarding the vehicle's practical usability and maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @cchrisrollins (The Seller) expresses a deep affection for the car, describing it as 'my baby.' It reflects a strong personal connection, as he notes his experiences customizing and enjoying the vehicle for various purposes, from autocross to drag racing. He portrays the car as versatile, being an excellent drag and drive option while also easily convertible for different uses, which adds to its appeal for prospective buyers.
Neutral: Comments from @CGREGORY22 and @Shralp emphasize interest in the car's speed and power. @CGREGORY22 asks a direct question about the car's fast capabilities, while @Shralp comments on the impressive power and notes the simplicity of the stock brakes and cooling system, indicating an understanding of the car's build. @Antoniofal seeks clarification on the AC system, which further emphasizes the mechanical details and modifications made to the vehicle.
Negative: @Antoniofal also raises a question about the removal of the AC system and its potential difficulties in reinstating it, hinting at possible concerns regarding comfort and usability for buyers who may wish for air conditioning. @cchrisrollins (The Seller) acknowledges this by stating that putting the AC back in would be fairly difficult, which could prompt hesitation among some buyers.
|
6k-Mile 2004 Saleen Mustang Saleen S281SC Speedster 5-Speed
1FAFP45X44F227185
Lot 238150
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, appreciating its stunning aesthetics and rarity. @deliguy804 highlighted the timeless excitement of these cars, complementing the photographer's skills in capturing the vehicle's beauty. @CobraHoov noted the appealing Screaming Yellow color and the loaded features of the car, expressing a desire to add it to their collection. Additionally, @Wilk01 recognized the meticulous care of the current owners, emphasizing that the car draws attention and wins accolades at car shows, which indicates its value as a standout example of the Saleen lineage.
Neutral: Some comments reflected on the vehicle's condition and historical significance without strong bias, indicating a balanced interest. @Perryml raised valuable questions regarding maintenance and the history of parts replacements on the 22-year-old car. They sought clarification on whether essential components like the motor mounts and suspension had been replaced. @CountGregor (The Seller) addressed these inquiries, confirming the car's originality while acknowledging some repainting due to rock chips. Furthermore, the conversation revealed a mix of nostalgia and technical curiosity, with discussions about the vehicle's unique attributes, including its low miles and performance specs.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance and past modifications, particularly around the repainting and potential issues with surface rust mentioned by @crazy4cars. They pointed out that for a car with low mileage, the presence of rust seemed unusual, suggesting that it might undermine the vehicle's value. Additionally, @Gary370 questioned why parts of the car had been repainted, indicating apprehension about the extent of its modification history. Furthermore, there were queries about the authenticity of the car's upgrades, as @Perryml noted discrepancies in the documentation regarding the brake upgrade and tonneau cover, which could have implications for the vehicle's credibility among collectors.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the vehicle as a wonderful and rare Crestline Skyliner, while @adoble describes it simply as a nice car. @MONDOBOY2 appreciates the car's aesthetic but suggests considering a redo on the reversed shackles, indicating they find it very nice overall. @pamcbride admires the Skyliner and believes it needs some TLC but doesn't foresee any major difficulties in acquiring what is needed for repairs, ending with a good luck wish for the seller. @Dnyce also finds the vehicle visually appealing and inquires about the extent of its driven distances.
Neutral: @neilpierson25 asks if the vehicle comes with an interior blind for the plexi roof, suggesting a potential buyer's interest in functionality. @Bennett05 inquires if Ford accessories installations can still be done on the car, indicating curiosity about customization options. @TFryhover (The Seller) acknowledges the presence of spider webbing on the plexiglass roof panel and confirms there is no interior blind available, providing practical information about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: @Dupodean expresses concern regarding the specific condition of the plexiglass roof panel, noting potential issues such as sun damage, spiderwebbing, peeling, or cracking, which could be red flags for prospective buyers. Overall, while the comments show enthusiasm for the car, they also highlight potential concerns that need to be addressed.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is receiving high praise from many commenters, with @Forrest27 calling it a beauty and @ChristopherM3 expressing excitement over its low mileage and aesthetics. @matthews_727 and @Hphillips echo similar sentiments, with @90IROC appreciating the seller's effort in detailing the undercarriage, which is highlighted again by @jujitsu who notes it is the cleanest he has seen on any car. The seller, @Bugulup, is commended for his thoroughness and dedication to presenting the vehicle well, creating a positive overall impression among those viewing the auction.
Neutral: Several commenters share inquiries and observations without strong emotional language. @MacS76 questions the oil used in servicing while @Scadillac asks for undercarriage photos from before the detailing process. @DanRod expresses interest in driving videos, illustrating how potential buyers seek more information to make informed decisions. @U0NLYLV4N0W also inquires about the amount of keys and manuals available, indicating engagement but lacking strong opinions on the vehicle's desirability at this stage.
Negative: A few comments reflect concerns or frustrations, especially related to technical issues with the commenting system as shared by @carstruck and @IMissMySaab, indicating user experience problems rather than vehicle-related issues. @InHisImage84 expresses sadness about the potential cost of purchasing the vehicle, which may deter some interested parties. The discussion includes skepticism regarding the actual condition of the vehicle as @MacS76 questions the oil dipstick photo, although these negative notes do not detract significantly from the overall positive perception.
|
 |
Positive: The comments indicate a high level of satisfaction with the care and restoration efforts that have gone into the 1998 GMC Yukon SLT. @SRTAMG150, the seller, highlights the clean title and accident-free carfax report, along with the extensive mechanical and cosmetic refurbishments carried out. Many users, like @Ezedozitt21, express appreciation for the vehicle, wishing the seller good luck with the auction, suggesting a positive perception of the Yukon’s condition. The restoration has included high-quality work such as a full repaint, upholstery updates, and deep cleaning, contributing to a well-preserved example of the model.
Neutral: Several comments request more specific information or clarification about the vehicle's condition. For instance, @pete-3 inquires about the front end steering and suspension components, indicating that potential buyers are looking for transparency and detail. @RTDaleAz also raises a concern about the repainting process, asking whether there are receipts available for the work done. These questions suggest that while the general impression of the truck is positive, prospective buyers want reassurance regarding the restoration quality and long-term reliability.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism and caution regarding the vehicle's condition. @RTDaleAz raises a valid concern about the painting quality, suggesting potential issues if the job was not done correctly. Additionally, there may be apprehension about the original condition of the interior, as @Illasram50 requests additional pictures of the carpeting to assess its state further. The need for verification from potential buyers underscores that despite the seller's confident claims, there is a level of mistrust regarding the vehicle's restorations.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the Ferrari Roma for its beautiful aesthetics, particularly the Grigio Silverstone color which @boaboyoz described as "gorgeousness" and @GrigioF430 found to be a "tasteful and classically understated combo" when paired with yellow calipers. @MikeFiftyNine remarked on the car's excellent condition, noting that it has been well cared for. @migarret expressed admiration for the Roma coupe as a timeless beauty, appreciating the subtle elegance of darker colors and the yellow piping in the interior. Overall, the vehicle has received strong positive feedback reflecting its visual appeal and overall craftsmanship.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed their own connections to the car and the surrounding context of driving a Ferrari in a busy area, such as @MikeFiftyNine who mentioned the changes in traffic and accessibility for driving in their locality. @Corveight also joined in, sharing insights about their own Blu Tour de France colored car and the similar experiences of exploring driving with a Ferrari. The seller, @Brian-lucas, communicated important details about the vehicle's maintenance history and ongoing usage, ensuring potential buyers know about the car’s upkeep.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about specific aspects of the Ferrari Roma, particularly regarding the soft-touch controls, as noted by @Corveight who mentioned the difficulty in mastering them despite their enjoyment of the car. Additionally, @Mikoyanan inquired about previous windshield damage, highlighting a potential issue related to a rock chip repair from 2025. While these points were addressed by the seller, they do indicate that there are minor issues that prospective buyers should be aware of as they consider the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Ctartaglia commented on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, noting it as a "double black gentleman's hot rod". @404_motorsports appreciated the car's color and specifications, reminiscing about their own F10 M5 and giving the vehicle high praise for its right components. @M5RAR (The Seller) expressed their emotional connection to the car, sharing how it was loved by their late husband for its grip, handling, and styling, which they have maintained and restored with significant care, emphasizing the car's status as a dream vehicle that has been pampered and treasured.
Neutral: @Dtyson inquired about the title's clean status and the mileage discrepancy, seeking clarity on the vehicle's history. @M5RAR (The Seller) addressed this by confirming the title's correction following an error in processing and outlined that true mileage had been reported through maintenance. They also discussed a previous minor accident involving a teenager and a bush, suggesting that the damage was not severe and would have required only minor bodywork, maintaining transparency about the vehicle's past.
Negative: @Ctartaglia raised concerns about potential issues stemming from the tree damage, specifically questioning the operation of the sunroof and any possibility of leaks or wind noise. @404_motorsports humorously noted the state of the second key and the windshield following the tree incident, implying potential concerns about the vehicle's condition. Overall, while positive aspects were highlighted, there remained undercurrents of skepticism regarding the vehicle's past accidents and their effects.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's design and characteristics, highlighting its beauty and performance. @Dollycat3 referred to the "beautiful 1962 wide track Grand Prix," while @georgepehanick mentioned it as one of his all-time favorite Pontiacs. The functionality of the car was also praised, with @drock73 sharing their firsthand experience and noting the vehicle's impressive torque and cruising ability, referring to these cars as "highway monsters." A positive sentiment about the car's aesthetic was echoed by @hairyolds, who appreciated its overall look.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on clarifying details about the vehicle's specifications and history, which reflects a neutral stance as the commenters sought more information. @Grandoaks inquired about the transmission type, while @TJClassic pointed out a correction regarding the vehicle's model year based on body plate decoding. @Pfeil provided additional information regarding the classification of the Grand Prix and clarified the styling identifier confusion. @SGUREL (The Seller) contributed comments regarding the car's background, indicating a connection to a Pontiac enthusiast and affirming the car's running condition but mentioning that specifics about certain features were uncertain.
Negative: Some concerns were raised that indicated skepticism or confusion about certain aspects of the vehicle. @Noisyboyz initially identified a discrepancy regarding the VIN number but later corrected their comment, showing an example of shifting perspectives. @Noisyboyz expressed reservations about the item but ultimately retracted their concerns. Furthermore, @Pfeil highlighted some confusion surrounding the vehicle's designation as a Grand Prix, suggesting that not all was clear about its identification. These comments reflect a sense of caution regarding the car's authenticity and possible discrepancies in its listed features.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reveal an understanding of its condition and history. @RDHRJSJC (The Seller) acknowledges inheriting the car and selling it as part of an estate. This transparency could be seen positively by potential buyers, as it indicates a straightforward approach to the sale.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's condition, specifically regarding any past accident details and the presence of an ignition interlock device. @Thornado asks for accident details, showing concern for the vehicle's history without appearing overly critical. @Car_collector's question indicates a desire for more information, reflecting a neutral stance as they seek clarification on potential issues.
Negative: On the negative side, @RDHRJSJC (The Seller) notes some minor scratches and chips, particularly on the door and hood areas, which could deter potential buyers looking for a vehicle in pristine condition. Furthermore, the lack of detailed accident information and the seller's limited picture uploads could raise concerns about transparency and lead to skepticism among interested parties.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle as a great sleeper, highlighting its impressive horsepower and overall build quality. @70_duster referred to it as an 'Awesome sleeper,' and @boaboyoz described it as a 'sweet spicy sleeper C1500,' showing appreciation for its performance capabilities. Many wished the seller good luck with the sale, indicating positive sentiments within the community.
Neutral: Questions about the vehicle's specifications and features were raised by various commenters. @Megaleto inquired about the vehicle's VIN and safety check requirements after changing ownership, while @zak123 asked for details on driving footage and additional engine internals, demonstrating a genuine interest in the vehicle's specifications. @66vair also posed a relevant question regarding fuel tanks, indicating potential buyers needed more information before making a decision.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed by commenters regarding the vehicle’s VIN issue and the need for safety checks. @zak123 noted that obtaining clarity on the engine's internals and whether the dyno results were from the chassis or engine would be critical for evaluating the truck's performance. @WIZZZZ raised questions about the truck's suspension components, bucket seats, and any rust issues, hinting at some reservations about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @goldlifter praised the vehicle's design, stating it's gorgeous and that Ford should take notes from Saleen on how to design the S650, as the factory design looks awkward in comparison. @joey88tc also chimed in positively about the car, expressing that it sounds great and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. The seller, @adamclarklaw, reinforced the appeal of the Saleen by highlighting its multiple exhaust options, allowing for a quieter drive, which many car enthusiasts appreciate.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification or more information about the vehicle's features and condition. @Harryguns inquired specifically about a frame rail in picture #59, questioning whether it was dented, and asked if any paint protection film (PPF) or ceramic coating had been applied. He also requested a cold start video and a driving video, expressing concern that some exhaust systems can be too loud. The seller responded that the frame rail was not dented and offered to upload videos showcasing the vehicle's features and its exhaust system.
Negative: @Harryguns' comments could be perceived as somewhat critical, as he questioned the integrity of the vehicle while suggesting that the auction might be affected by his inquiries. @joey88tc challenged @Harryguns, accusing him of attempting to sabotage the auction through his questioning. Overall, while there are concerns raised about the vehicle’s condition and the assumptions about its sound, the atmosphere remains largely supportive with more positive feedback than negativity.
|
 |
Positive: @Mikewillbe, the seller, expresses affection for the McLaren 12C, stating that it is the most comfortable road trip car he has owned, especially in L.A., where he enjoys taking trips with friends. He appreciates the hydraulic suspension and the car's performance in both Sport and Normal modes. He is transparent in the comments, answering questions promptly about various issues potential buyers might have, including its comfort and handling. Many commenters, like @RoundHouseRealty and @geldingmakr, commend him for his responsiveness and transparency throughout the auction process, with @RoundHouseRealty sharing a positive driving experience after recently purchasing a 12C.
Neutral: Several participants ask technical questions about the vehicle, such as whether it includes front axle lift or the IRIS 2 infotainment system. @JimRugg and @Mikeyman1995 inquire about various features and options, including the air conditioning and whether the car has front/rear cameras. The seller @Mikewillbe confirms the absence of the front axle lift and IRIS 2 while also responding to requests for an options list. Concerns about the open recall are raised by @Flyinghye, which leads @Mikewillbe to update everyone, clarifying that there are no open recalls on the vehicle. The paint color is confirmed to be Carbon Fiber Black, further satisfying potential bidders' queries.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the car's condition and prior service, especially concerning the open recalls mentioned in the Carfax report by @Flyinghye. @SuperFast1 lists common issues related to the model, prompting @Mikewillbe to reassure all that he has had no significant problems during his ownership. Others, like @Mikeyman1995, question potential leaks and the vehicle's maintenance history, seeking confirmation from the seller. Despite the challenges brought up, including some wear on the interior buttons noted by @Mikeyman1995, @Mikewillbe responds with detailed explanations, striving to address concerns without being defensive.
|
 |
Positive: @mwerg130 (The Seller) expresses a deep affection for the 1985 Porsche 944, highlighting his excitement about the auction and willingness to answer questions. @DAY_DR3AM compliments the car's appearance, suggesting that there might be an interesting story behind its purchase. Additionally, several comments praise the vehicle's condition, with @PerryPigeon noting its cleanliness, while @mwerg130 mentions significant maintenance and upgrades, including a working odometer with 67,000 original miles, factory sport seats, and a well-maintained exhaust system. Overall, the vehicle is portrayed as a beloved and well-cared-for car, with substantial investments made over the years.
Neutral: In a conversation with potential bidders, @jmerria2 queries about the low mileage (775 miles in 5 years), to which @mwerg130 explains that the vehicle mainly served as a weekend car, driven on local winding roads. The seller recounts a detailed history of his journey with the Porsche brand, including previous cars owned and maintenance experience. There were also inquiries about the vehicle's history, including a vandalism incident noted in the CarFax report, with @TheGiuce seeking clarity on the specifics and @mwerg130 providing context about the prior owner's experience.
Negative: On the negative side, some concerns regarding the vehicle's condition are raised, with @Spokayman pointing out the age discrepancy among the tires, while @zytec demands clarification on the functioning of the oil pressure gauge, indicating its importance to vehicle performance. @RHuntsman questions if there was any bumper accident that caused damage, while @jmforgey discusses the rear bumper's state and potential for DIY repairs. @mwerg130 reassures bidders by addressing these concerns directly, stating that the issues are manageable and do not detract significantly from the vehicle's overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the unique features of the vehicle, especially its external aesthetics and the modifications made. @Sergiodeleo highlights that the car stands out, suggesting it reflects a youthful and vibrant lifestyle, rather than an everyday family vehicle. @Sircaralot (The Seller) emphasizes that the stereo system is factory and OEM, indicating a level of quality and authenticity, although it has a subwoofer that may not be original to the car, showing a consideration for the next owner's preferences.
Neutral: Several inquiries focus on the car's specific components and maintenance issues. @MikeGNH asks about the back seat subwoofer's removability, while @GREEKMBA questions the cost of headliner repairs with original Bentley parts. @Sircaralot (The Seller) responds to both, providing insights into the vehicle's factory components and offering practical advice on repair options. Additionally, @Rance6 raises concerns about the brakes and air struts' condition, suggesting that potential buyers consider inspection before purchase, which indicates a careful approach to the vehicle's maintenance history and current state.
Negative: There are comments reflecting dissatisfaction regarding potential repair costs and the condition of certain features. @Rance6 expresses concern about expenses related to ceramic-composite brakes and air struts, hinting at the high maintenance demands of such luxury vehicles. @Drdodger shares a sentiment of loss regarding the car's interior comfort, suggesting that the modifications may have compromised the luxurious experience typically associated with a Bentley. Overall, these remarks highlight worries about the overall upkeep and the impact of aftermarket modifications on the car's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Overall, the vehicle has garnered significant admiration for its beauty and restoration quality. Commenters like @tlcamg and @Dollycat3 highlighted the car's stunning Papyrus White and Graphite Grey finish, calling it gorgeous and absolutely stunning. Several users, including @georgepehanick and @300SE_Bulgaria, noted the thorough refurbishment work, including the complete engine and interior overhaul, making it a desirable model among collectors. @Luz_do_sol praised the car as among the finest of restorations and mentioned the rarity of the W112 models, reinforcing its special status in the automotive community. The Seller's engagement and responsiveness to feedback were also positively received, with acknowledgments for the updates made to the vehicle and appreciative comments about the extensive work done.
Neutral: There were some discussions regarding the vehicle's presentation in the auction, particularly about its ride height. @daleallen and @georgepehanick raised concerns about the car seeming to sit high in photos, while @300SE_Bulgaria confirmed the car was photographed in a high suspension setting. The Seller addressed these comments, promising to provide more photos to clarify the height issue and acknowledging the oversight in photo presentation. The mention of the restoration's costs, with an estimated expenditure around $113,000, led to questions about the specifics of those expenses, highlighting a mixture of curiosity and skepticism from commenters.
Negative: Despite the admiration, there were notable criticisms about details that seemed overlooked in the restoration process. Commenters like @jabbejokker and @daleallen pointed out issues such as misaligned emblems and incorrect components, questioning the oversight given the significant refurbishment costs mentioned. @SSBN629 humorously criticized the inclusion of minimal shop supplies as part of the estimated costs, suggesting a lack of depth in the listed expenditures. Additionally, concerns were raised about the presence of overspray on components in some of the restoration photos, prompting questions about quality control during the car's preparation for sale. These comments reflect a level of frustration regarding the attention to detail expected for such a high-value vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Vic (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a beautiful Model A that runs and drives fantastic, noting its overall decent shape and inviting potential buyers to view additional videos showcasing the car. The seller reinforces the appeal of the vehicle by sharing images and videos that exhibit the car's features such as the capability of the top to go down, demonstrating its functionality and inviting further interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments from users like @59elva and @spdway1 point out specific details about the vehicle that might warrant further clarification, such as the number of side mount spares and the functionality of the cab's top. Other inquiries regarding the condition of the exhaust manifold from @Tenino54 and specifications regarding the pickup’s history from @griz99005 indicate a general interest in the car's specifications and maintenance, showcasing a dialogue aimed at gathering accurate information before making a decision.
Negative: Critical comments from users highlight concerns about the vehicle's modifications and condition. @Tenino54 identified a possible crack in the exhaust manifold, suggesting a potential issue that may require welding. Additionally, @griz99005 raised questions regarding the alterations made to the wood frame, indicating that the restoration process may have left some elements unclear, with a particular focus on the scratched number plate and whether the gauge functions as intended. These comments suggest that while the vehicle has its charm, there are areas that need addressing and clarification from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters, including @Rhya and @Djordan442, expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as 'gorgeous' and 'yummy'. @JohnF1966 noted the car's well-documented history, highlighting its restoration quality and unique colors. @hairyolds emphasized the high standards of workmanship, stating it is 'great looking' and that the Canadian documentation would add value. Others like @OldZzz complimented the choice of narrow stripes, adding to its aesthetic appeal, while @DrDick and @Bob71 both appreciated the attention to detail in the restoration.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the topic of documentation and the car's verification process. @DJordan442, @Sigma76, and others discussed the importance of Canadian historical documents in verifying the car's original specifications and factory options, while @KRickli (The Seller) confirmed that they would be pursuing this information. @NYMO provided key details about the broadcast card, indicating the original paint and production date, while @LoneStarMotorsports raised concerns about the missing trim tag and its impact on the car's value. Although there were questions about authenticity, many acknowledged the car's overall appeal.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding aspects of the vehicle. @LoneStarMotorsports pointed out that the missing trim tag could significantly affect the car's value, suggesting that it should have been disclosed before the auction. @digregorioj and others noted that reproductions can easily misrepresent a car’s original specifications. Additionally, comments about some blurry photographs from @a990dna raised questions about the clarity and documentation of the car's original elements, while @Blurple shared his opinion that red is not a fitting color for the 442 model, signaling a disconnection with the car's presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @PeterTx provides thorough information about the vehicle, including an extensive service history with over 11 years of invoices available for review. He confidently states that the car has never lost oil and emphasizes the care taken to maintain it in excellent condition. Additionally, he promptly addresses inquiries about the vehicle's accident history, confirming that damage is limited to a rear bumper cover and trunk lid, with no significant issues elsewhere. He appreciates the compliments regarding the car's color combination and reassures potential buyers about its functionality.
Neutral: Commenters express curiosity about the vehicle's accident details and title status. @Asher1611 seeks clarification on the extent of damage and whether it affects critical functionalities like the trunk latch. @Jocko315 inquires about the title's cleanliness, showing that buyers want transparency and assurance about the vehicle's history.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @Nitrouspaul regarding the vehicle's oil changes and potential oil loss, suggesting that he is skeptical about the claimed maintenance records. @Nitrouspaul also mentions the possible cost of repairs, indicating that there may be more significant issues than originally presented, and questions about damage assessment from a body shop further highlight the uncertainty. Issues with the title's description being updated imply lapses in communication that could deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @JMESS2975 highlights that low mileage 996s are becoming increasingly rare and collectible, noting that this example is in excellent condition and will attract Porsche enthusiasts. The comment recognizes the transition of these vehicles from 'throwaway drivers' to sought-after collectibles, suggesting an optimistic outlook for the auction outcome. Additionally, @kmarku appreciates the seller's transparency and expresses enthusiasm for their services, indicating a positive sales experience.
Neutral: Comments from @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) provide insights into their dealership’s operations, emphasizing the sourcing of unique vehicles and commitment to transparency in transactions. They invite inquiries about inspection services and logistics support, reinforcing their customer-oriented approach. The discussion mentions auction dynamics and bidding strategies, with various users contemplating the auction's progression and value adjustments.
Negative: Some commenters express skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly with @Thomas54 questioning the hardtop fit and @Belair1900 pointing out an absence of information about the IMS issue, which raises concerns. @eknightBAT mentions the typical costs associated with IMS replacements, suggesting that buyers should budget for these repairs. @laker1304 raises logistical concerns about personal circumstances impacting the potential purchase and storage requirements, indicating hesitance in moving forward without more information.
|
 |
Positive: The comments express admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a beautiful example and noting the exceptionally low mileage. @RecoveringAtty remarks on the unique experience of driving a Ferrari 360 and appreciates the aesthetic of the car. @Cabel highlights the beautiful specification of the vehicle, reinforcing its desirability. @NCRSmaniac praises the clean, elegant appearance of the coupe and emphasizes the joyful handling and powerful performance of the model. Overall, the general sentiment among these commentators is one of respect and enthusiasm for the vehicle's design and capabilities.
Neutral: Several technical inquiries and clarifications were raised by the commentators regarding the car's condition and service history. @CMD1 and @Kamps16 seek specific details about the timing belt service and air conditioning functionality, indicating a thoughtful consideration of the vehicle's maintenance. @Mikeyman1995 also inquires about the practicality of transporting luggage, showcasing a practical interest in the car's usability. Meanwhile, @clean_machina requests additional information about the aftermarket subwoofer installation and its potential impact on performance, demonstrating an engaged discussion around the vehicle's features.
Negative: A few concerns were voiced, particularly about the vehicle's service records and certain missing features. @lottacars queried the completeness of service records over 24 years, prompting a response from @Notap1962 (The Seller) who clarified that scanned invoices are the only records available. @Alarmla asked about the sticky buttons, a common issue with older Ferrari models, but was assured by the seller that this model does not have such problems. Additionally, @Arnaldo8 pointed out the absence of Ferrari shields on the fenders, leading to a discussion on opinions among purists and the historical context of this design choice.
|
 |
Positive: @Raffi (The Seller) has shared that the Range Rover is a well-maintained vehicle with low mileage, no smoke or unpleasant odors, and preserved interior features like leather and carpet. It has been converted to coil spring suspension for an improved ride and has stored indoors, indicating good care over the years. The owner seems to appreciate the vehicle's history in the family and mentions that it has cold air conditioning and a smooth ride. The seller has offered to provide transport assistance for the winning bidder, demonstrating a commitment to customer service. Several commenters appreciate the vehicle's aesthetic qualities, especially the appealing color.
Neutral: @WAGONBOYTD and @Malibu955 have discussed the check engine light (CEL) concerns and its possible relation to the vehicle running too lean, suggesting a smoke test may help identify any air leaks. The seller has addressed these concerns, stating that there appears to be no impact on the driving experience and that the CEL light is a common issue. @CHF2 asked about the BECM and suspension conversion, to which @Raffi (The Seller) responded with reassurance that there are no known issues.
Negative: @Bug36T57 raised concerns about the sunroof not latching and the potential for water damage to the headliner. Although @Raffi (The Seller) confirmed that the sunroof has not caused water intrusion, the drooping headliner is a point of concern. Additionally, @Bug36T57 inquired about any rust or corrosion given the vehicle's brief Alaska history, to which @Raffi (The Seller) noted that the Rover spent most of its life in Southern California and Washington, minimizing concerns about rust, but acknowledged general signs of age in the undercarriage. @Mrtilson3 also inquired about potential head gasket issues, adding another layer to the vehicle's reported concerns.
|
 |
Positive: The K5 Blazer has received several compliments regarding its appearance and overall maintenance. Commentors such as @s_fitz and @JAY-Z praised the vehicle for being a modern classic with a striking two-tone color scheme. Additionally, @ValleyVintage acknowledged the vehicle's good condition, affirming its well-maintained status, while @Busboss reminisced about their own positive experiences with similar trucks, highlighting the enjoyment and nostalgia associated with the Blazer. Overall, the vehicle seems to have garnered interest and respect from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several questions about the vehicle raised by various users show a solid interest in details regarding performance and condition. @gint and @ValleyVintage inquired specifically about the emissions equipment and rust potential, which indicates a concern for the vehicle's compliance and maintenance history. @BW253 (The Seller) addressed these inquiries directly, indicating there have been some modifications to the original setup, and they also responded positively to requests for more photos. The dialogue reflects an open communication about the vehicle's condition, allowing potential bidders to make informed decisions.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reactions, there were concerns raised about potential issues and the vehicle's condition. @ekalantzis mentioned noticing some oil seepage around the differentials and transfer case, raising questions regarding maintenance records. Additionally, @MoparGuy_1 expressed worries about rust around the VIN plate, suggesting a need for additional inspection photos of various parts of the truck. The seller acknowledged these concerns but noted the truck's current condition without leaks. Such issues may cause hesitation for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @revron remarked on the car's aesthetic, noting how it looks like it could have come straight out of the late 50s or early 60s, which reflects a nostalgic charm. @MikeFiftyNine praised the vehicle as a great example of a lead sled, highlighting its unique features such as the dash and rear quarters that set it apart. The combination of various parts from different models was seen as a hallmark of true customization, making it a desirable find especially since these older models are becoming rarer.
Neutral: @1hot55 (The Seller) provided background on the vehicle, explaining that it was purchased by a friend in 2016 and is now being sold due to the owner's passing. The Seller is open to answering questions but admits limited knowledge about certain details related to the car's build. A video of the car running was also confirmed, showing that the engine operates well, suggesting a level of operational reliability.
Negative: While the car has charm and historical value, @1hot55 (The Seller) detailed some limitations, including various functionalities that either work sporadically or are untested. The heater, for instance, may not be functional, and the radio has issues that might require attention. Additionally, the car is showing signs of age and in need of minor repairs, which has been acknowledged in the context of the immense work that went into creating it.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its impeccable condition and originality. @lewisfoto noted that it's a stunning car and highlighted the low mileage since the last auction. @JMinPDX emphasized that true time capsules like this one rarely come on the market, further solidifying its value. @coopspeed, who inspected the car in person, endorsed its superior preservation and expressed excitement about the comprehensive documentation included with the sale. Also, @Slavs lauded it as one of the finest representations of a 1600, likening its significance to Porsche's pre-A 356, and highlighted the car's improved handling thanks to a sway bar installation.
Neutral: Several comments included useful technical insights regarding the car's components and historical context. @Hywyflyr and @LouFifer engaged in a discussion about the correct lubrication for the vehicle's joints, showcasing the mechanical knowledge of the community. @diligaf pointed out recent updates like proper tire and axle boot corrections, indicating the seller's attention to detail. Commenters also debated over the car's historical specifications, such as taillight colors and original features, while @fiminod, the seller, addressed questions and clarified aspects about the vehicle's interior and originality.
Negative: Amidst the praise, there were concerns regarding the vehicle, particularly regarding its pricing history. @my3.0 remarked on the decline in price from $53,500 to $40,250, attributing it to changes in market demand since the pandemic. Additionally, @grcorey raised doubts about the originality of specific interior components, suggesting potential modifications. Some technical concerns were also raised by @Hywyflyr regarding the lubricants used in the axle joints, with criticism on the way certain repairs were executed, implying they may need reevaluation for safety and functionality. This blend of insights reflects both the admiration for and scrutiny of this classic vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @FilthyRatAttack remarked that this vehicle is a really nice example, and @Discobob expressed nostalgia by saying that his 77 Civic CVCC was the funnest car he owned, suggesting that this smaller model is even more exciting. @Lannis and @Tom_S. shared fond memories of their experiences with similar models, with Lannis noting the gas mileage in the 40s and easy repairs, and Tom commenting on how adorable the Honda 600 is and mentioning fun experiences with a friend's N600. @Skimaker praised the driving video and @KingDiamondStylus called it a cool car, indicating strong positive sentiments about its overall appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters asked questions regarding specific characteristics of the vehicle. @David_C. inquired about the Z600's availability in the U.S. and its relation to the Civic, while @Thatch sought information on the engine displacement. Other comments included discussions about the vehicle's cruising speed, with @rhamman sharing his personal experience of driving it at 65-70 mph, and comparisons being made to other cars regarding speed and handling. @nielen noted that the original Honda Z600 had a 600cc engine, providing context for the discussion about engine specifications.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns or provided negative remarks about certain aspects of the vehicle. @Skiv pointed out that while it looks like fun to drive, the steering appears a bit loose and it may not handle well on the road due to the short wheelbase. @cwood13 seemed skeptical about the actual performance of the vehicle, questioning if it could truly achieve highway speeds given its lower horsepower. Additionally, @Gary_T1 made a comment regarding the current bidding price, implying that it could have purchased multiple units when new, hinting at perceived overvaluation.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @Supraman623 declaring that the "chop sounds amazing" and @timporvida simply stating "Nice Ride." @Serj called it a "cool truck" while @UnlimitedFunds shared their love for the truck and highlighted the significant investment made to enhance its performance. @mikebaumtx reminisced about the Escalade V, praising it as one of the best modified vehicles he has driven, noting that it has a remarkable sound.
Neutral: Several commenters sought to understand more about the vehicle's specifications and history. @Tripledigit inquired about the replacement motor on the 3-year-old truck, while @Gbird0116 asked about the warranty. @mikes440 speculated on the reason for the motor replacement, citing a recall, and @Reeshenator provided clarity on the warranty situation. The seller, @MontanaAutoCollective, confirmed that the engine replacement occurred during modifications but mentioned that it may not come with a warranty due to the nature of the work done.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's reliability. @UnlimitedFunds noted that while the modifications made the truck quicker, they might have hurt its resale value, stating that performance upgrades typically compromise reliability. Additionally, @samsingh pointed out the potential red flag of five owners for a 2023 model, hinting at possible issues. @Tamuiel questioned the absence of an LMR sticker, suggesting a lack of authenticity in the modifications.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters have praised the aesthetic appeal and historical significance of the 1938 Buick Roadmaster, highlighting it as a beautiful car. @RBailey57 reminisced about a similar model owned by his grandfather, while @Dollycat3 described it as absolutely stunning with a lovely art deco interior and dash. Other commenters, like @goldengup, emphasized the Car's fantastic nature and superior quality compared to contemporaries such as Cadillac. Similarly, @Middler89 noted the impressive state of the car's dashboard and steering wheel, expressing admiration for its condition.
From a neutral standpoint, comments indicate that while the car is visually striking, there are some functional concerns that could be addressed. @KAWJCB, the seller, acknowledged the car is 88 years old and mentioned minor oil leaks, claiming it has been remarkably reliable with minimal need for service over two years. He also explained that accessories like the horn and speedometer are not fully functional, clarifying he intends to sell the car to someone who can care for it properly given his mechanic can no longer assist. Furthermore, @hr47cars suggested that posting a driving video could enhance interest, highlighting that the vehicle is not expected to be a daily driver.
On the negative side, several comments have raised concerns about the car's mechanical condition. @MARTY_ROTH expressed skepticism about the non-functional accessories and questioned the seller's decision not to address these issues. Additionally, @BaronVonStampe expressed worry over a potential knocking noise from the engine, inquiring whether the seller had investigated the sound. @Natvson noted this commentary, suggesting the ticking might indicate a leak or valve issue, requiring further attention. @mcj4250, who examined the car, remarked on the engine's strong performance while noting the ticking sound, which they attributed to potential exhaust issues but reassured that these were minor repairs that wouldn't significantly impact drivability. Overall, there is a shared sentiment of admiration tempered by concerns over necessary mechanical repairs.
Neutral:
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Several comments praised the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and upgrades. @po_box_33 expressed their love for the side molding decal, while @DeLoreanTech referred to it as a beautiful example of a DMC-12. @Vehicross99 described the car as spectacular and a 'Holy Grail of automobiles', indicating a strong passion for the model. @Bongiovi noted tasteful modifications including a gated shifter and dealer decals, indicating the vehicle's desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments contained inquiries about the vehicle's features and condition. @Top_Fuel_Friday asked about the battery cutoff switch and the alignment of the steering wheel, indicating concerns that may affect its drivability. @aaronreliable brought up the functionality of the air conditioning and heating, while @dpnobile inquired about repairs related to the engine and suspension, showing a detailed interest in the car's maintenance history. The seller, @RapleyClassicCars, efficiently addressed these questions and provided transparent information about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There were certain comments that raised concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and mechanical issues. @steel-and-fire noted the absence of the front end recall work, indicating a lack of attention to potential safety concerns. Additionally, @dpnobile brought up that the car runs a little rough, questioning whether a fix had been recommended and whether various components, including suspension bushings, had been replaced. These comments pointed towards underlying issues that may need to be addressed before purchasing.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally favorable view of the vehicle, particularly from @amotorsports, who emphasizes that it is a one-owner car that has been well maintained and serviced by Mercedes-Benz. The seller notes the vehicle's excellent driving performance, new tires, and overall cleanliness, which is reassuring for potential buyers looking for a quality car. Additionally, the seller’s willingness to provide further information and assistance during the auction process adds a positive touch to the overall experience.
Neutral: There are some neutral inquiries about specific features of the car, such as @JohnKennelly's question about whether it has been smoked in. The seller promptly responds, confirming that it has not been smoked in, which suggests transparency and helps maintain buyer confidence. Another neutral comment from CraigslistMadeMeRich asks about the heated steering wheel option, indicating that potential buyers are interested in the vehicle's amenities but not expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle noted in the interactions. All comments presented are either inquiries or positive affirmations from the seller about the car's condition and features. This lack of critical feedback indicates a favorable view of the vehicle among the respondents.
|
 |
Positive: @Schmidlack remarked on the car's outstanding appearance, especially praising the nice color that screams "Sports Car!" without being over the top, and the beautiful wheels. @eman_308 shared their positive experience with a similar car, the Classica, noting it’s great and turns heads, stating it is much better looking than a Miata, which they feel resembles a 'chick car'. @Thesunisrising expressed a strong desire for the car, saying it would make a great addition to their collection alongside other vehicles they own, indicating high regard for the car's aesthetics.
Neutral: @Valimotorsports (The Seller) addressed @Evildad's inquiry about the car's history, explaining that it has the same owner and mentioning that only 200 more miles have been added since it was last listed. They humorously noted the owner's challenges in getting in and out of the car at an older age. @81Winfield asked about the paint match on the front bumper and how it looks in person, which was acknowledged by @Valimotorsports (The Seller) who described potential variations in appearance based on lighting conditions.
Negative: @River_Relic raised a concern about Mazda infotainment screens cracking, sharing a personal experience of similar issues with their Mazda3, which could indicate potential quality issues. @WeirdHarold expressed disappointment over FCA's design choices, specifically criticizing how hard it is to get heated seats and a manual transmission in these vehicles. @Evildad questioned the timeline between the car's listings, expressing confusion about the car's status and its unchanging condition, hinting at potential red flags.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments reflect a strong appreciation for the overall condition and aesthetic appeal of the vehicle. @MattyGatch praised the car as 'gorgeous' and well-presented, complimenting the detailing done for the listing. @JimmoVette expressed enthusiasm for the 997 model, stating it combines luxury with performance uniquely, and recognized the car as well cared for. The seller, @beckseuropean, has engaged positively with inquiries, highlighting the detailed maintenance history and providing reassurances about the car's service records, which adds to the vehicle's credibility.
Neutral: Discussions surrounding engine service and bore scoring are ongoing, with various opinions shared among commentors. @TMbat prompted a discussion on the timing for major engine service, while @GCam67 asked for clarification on bore scope images, reflecting a typical concern for prospective buyers. The seller's responses indicate professional assessments of the cylinders but emphasize the subjective interpretation of what constitutes 'acceptable' wear, causing some to consider the implications of bore scoring and engine longevity without influencing their overall view of the car as an opportunity.
Negative: Concerns regarding potential issues related to bore scoring and maintenance records have surfaced within comments. @4CamGT noted that issues like bore scoring should be factored into the buying process since they could require costly repairs later, citing estimates for engine rebuilds. @Steve1968LS2 pointed out a missed opportunity for protective film application on the vehicle, indicating concerns about its maintenance in the harsh desert environment. Additionally, questions about the condition of the brake pads and transmission service records from @eljefe71 further reflect scrutiny on the car's overall maintenance through its lifespan.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 highlighted the vehicle's stunning appearance, noting its classic Silver Gray Metallic color matched with black leather interior and emphasized that it has been well-cared for and comes with excellent documentation. This high regard for the vehicle's quality reflects positively on its potential value and desirability among collectors.
Neutral: @Bauer5200 (The Seller) provided potential bidders with useful insights, including additional images and details about the car's specifications. The seller also showcased the car's numbers matching credentials, which are significant for authenticity and resale value. The seller offered transparency by addressing questions about the vehicle's condition and by providing historical context related to similar sales to assist bidders in making informed decisions.
Negative: @Mr.Klomfar257 expressed concerns regarding potential fluid leaks, asking for assurance about the vehicle's condition. This raises a point of caution for interested buyers who may be worried about mechanical issues. Additionally, @wbg62851's request for a trunk photo with the liner removed indicates a desire to inspect for corrosion, suggesting that there may be some underlying doubts regarding the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @gpc157 expresses pride in the vehicle, highlighting its immaculate condition with zero swirl marks and a striking paint color that draws attention. They describe the car as a versatile daily driver with a smooth 6-speed manual transmission and comfortable enough for regular use, even though it was primarily used as a weekend fun car. @agreenstine and @WesTxStoner also commend the vehicle, referring to it as beautiful and noting the appealing color that potential buyers will love.
Neutral: @gpc157 is transparent about the vehicle's current condition, acknowledging a dry substance on the rear differential that they are addressing with a mechanic. The seller keeps the community updated on the inspection and repair plans, emphasizing that they are meticulous about maintenance and cleaning. @RuHeffna raises a couple of questions about possible issues with the headliner and tire pictures, showing curiosity about the details while also complimenting the car's beauty.
Negative: Several comments mention potential issues with the vehicle. @Breakmywallet1 and @Retrowonder point out a differential bushing leak and a subframe bushing leak, which are concerns for potential buyers. @RuHeffna questions the cleanliness of the vehicle based on photos, suggesting it may have been a smoker's vehicle, leading to further scrutiny. While the seller assures the community that everything is being promptly addressed, these comments indicate that some buyers remain uncertain about the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's striking aesthetic and authenticity. @kinglaw noted its classic color combination of Signal Red and Black, mentioning that it was done to the highest standards. @M5Z3M called it a 'stunner', while @NSY64 praised it as an incredible car, referring to it as an 'iconic piece of art'. @RodH shared his fondness for the E-Type, describing exhilarating drives and emphasizing its unique charm and performance. The excitement from potential buyers was palpable, with @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) indicating that many were pleased with their in-person experiences at the viewing.
Neutral: Some comments were geared towards answering questions or discussing specifics about the vehicle. @Peter_69 inquired about the factory specifications such as colors and engine details. @elipper sought clarification on the vehicle's retrofitted four-speed transmission, showing curiosity without expressing a strong opinion. @Nereidi asked whether oil leaks were significant, while @DiamondMan wanted to know where he could view the vehicle and who services these specific V12s in the area. @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) responded to these inquiries promptly, indicating a willingness to provide additional information.
Negative: There were a few reservations expressed about the vehicle. @Nereidi questioned the severity of a reported oil leak, implying that potential buyers might have concerns about maintenance issues. @fchord humorously noted that he would opt out of the bidding due to the non-functioning 8-track player, suggesting that some features could deter interest. @Viper1 and @NSY64 discussed the tire situation, with concerns about authenticity versus practical use, hinting at a divide between purists and those looking for performance rather than absolute originality. Overall, while the majority of remarks were positive, there were indications of caution regarding specific features and potential mechanical issues.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @michaelbunch, provided clear and prompt responses to inquiries regarding the vehicle. For instance, @georgepehanick asked about the hood pins, and @michaelbunch confirmed that they are OEM, indicating a level of quality that many buyers appreciate. Additionally, @highstone requested a picture of the window sticker, which @michaelbunch was quick to provide, showcasing transparency in the selling process.
Neutral: The interaction between the seller and potential buyers appears to be straightforward, with questions being answered directly. @georgepehanick's query about the hood pins is reasonable for anyone considering a vehicle, and @highstone's request for a window sticker also falls into typical buyer inquiries. This suggests that other potential buyers may have similar questions regarding authenticity and details of the vehicle.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments about the vehicle itself or the seller's responses. However, some potential buyers may find the need for additional documentation or photos to verify details slightly off-putting, although @michaelbunch's willingness to provide such information mitigates this concern.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is a striking 2022 GT3 in a unique Python Green color, creating a strong impression and receiving high praise from enthusiasts. Commentors like @boaboyoz and @mkxair highlight its visual appeal, describing it as a 'fierce mean machine' and a 'seriously cool machine'. Others, like @MattyGatch and @kotykb, noted the exceptional color choice, with @kotykb mentioning it as one of the best colors on a modern Porsche, and @MattyGatch appreciating the economical value compared to other custom options. The seller, @JLRStPete, has actively engaged with the comments, providing informative answers and boasting of the vehicle's features such as a clean DME report and fully installed Paint Protection Film (PPF).
Neutral: The auction has drawn various questions and comments about the vehicle's features and history. Commentors such as @Pinkbunny and @whcheney asked about the car's PPF, track time, and DME report, indicating a shared desire for transparency regarding its condition. The seller clarified that the car has not been tracked and offered to provide the full DME report to interested bidders. Additionally, @emalburd inquired about the warranty transfer to the auction winner, to which the seller confirmed that it would indeed be passed on. This suggests an active dialogue between potential buyers and the seller, focusing on ensuring all details are understood before bidding.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the decision to sell the vehicle after only 400 miles, with @cladbolg questioning the rationale behind such a short ownership. Additionally, @Tunedm3 expressed hesitation about specific features of the car, such as the seats and absence of carbon-fiber brakes, which some potential buyers may find less appealing. These comments reflect some apprehension about the value and specifications of the vehicle, despite its highlighted strengths in color and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, describing it as 'Beautiful' and 'Absolutely Awesome'. @CSmith1142 noted the aesthetics of the truck, while @SirPantelonesDeLugo echoed this sentiment, emphasizing its visual appeal. @obsfordguy highlighted specific features such as the bumper, bed slide, and grab handles, adding to the overall positive reception of the truck. The sentiment was reinforced by @59FUELIEIMPALA, who referred to it as a 'Beautiful 1997 F-350 Ford' and expressed excitement over comparing it with another truck he owns, showcasing the truck's desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information about the vehicle, primarily focusing on inquiries related to its performance and features. @GLWTA,3Fords questioned the importance of fuel efficiency for potential buyers, suggesting that those concerned with MPG might not be suited for this truck. @Wyobasque asked about the process for removing the bed slide, indicating interest in the vehicle's practical aspects. @JayB93 raised a technical question regarding a parasitic draw linked to the remote start system, seeking clarity on prior issues as well as possible resolutions.
Negative: A few comments hinted at issues that could deter potential buyers. @3Fords suggested that if someone is worrying about MPG, they may not truly be ready for this type of truck, possibly indicating that it's more suited for those who prioritize power over fuel efficiency. Additionally, @JayB93's question about the remote start system implies that there may be unresolved issues affecting the truck's functionality, which could be a concern for some buyers. This raises potential doubts about the reliability of the vehicle, despite its good looks and overall praise.
|
2003 Harley-Davidson Heritage Softail Classic 100th Anniversary
1HD1BWB443Y029720
Lot 238209
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the bike as a beautiful and very nice-looking Heritage Classic. @RoganJames describes it as gorgeous and expresses interest in its potential, indicating a positive overall impression. @lostleader71 (The Seller) also highlights that the bike is super clean, with no accident history and perfect tins and bags, aside from a minor scratch, which seems to reassure potential buyers.
Neutral: There are questions about specific features and components of the bike, like the original mufflers and the 100th anniversary Gold Key, to which @lostleader71 (The Seller) responds that they are not available. The inquiries about the tire type and the presence of a bike cover are practical and indicate potential buyers are doing their due diligence. The discussions about cam tensioners also reflect curiosity rather than outright negativity, with multiple individuals discussing their significance and past issues without condemning the bike's condition.
Negative: Some potential buyers, such as @RoganJames, express concerns about the cam tensioners, which are known to have issues in the Twin Cam engine, although he clarifies that this does not detract from the bike's overall beauty. The dialogue about cam tensioners indicates a level of caution and vigilance among prospective buyers. Comments related to tire type and minor scratches also hint at a perceived need for careful scrutiny before purchase, showcasing a cautious approach to buying the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @dgclassiccars expresses enthusiasm about the Mitsubishi Pajero Convertible, noting its rarity and hoping it finds a new owner. @unorthodoxautos appreciates the vehicle's left-hand drive format, highlighting his past ownership experience with the Pajero and expressing delight in finding one that deviates from the usual right-hand drive models. @Kwe reflects on the scarcity of Paj cabriolets, signaling excitement about the opportunity to acquire such a unique vehicle.
Neutral: @Glsski seeks clarification on the vehicle's location, acknowledging the car is located in Northern Italy as confirmed by @dgclassiccars. This suggests a level of interest in the vehicle, albeit with practical considerations about its availability.
Negative: @FoMoCo_ raises concerns about the vehicle's mechanical state, questioning the absence of a service history and the current roadworthiness of the car. The lack of detailed information regarding maintenance might deter potential buyers looking for assurance before making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @My911fixxx shared their experience with a White version of this vehicle, stating it was the best car they ever owned and showing enthusiasm for the present vehicle's mileage and condition. @bowiebiewer praised the M3CS for its unique compliance compared to the baseline M3, highlighting its quality build. @spearfisherman8 (The Seller) confirmed that the car has been upgraded with tasteful OEM+ modifications and remains a crowd-pleaser, emphasizing how fun it is to drive and share with others.
Neutral: @spearfisherman8 (The Seller) addressed inquiries about original parts included with the car, mentioning that OEM wheels, springs, and intake come with it. They also provided details on upgrades like KW height-adjustable springs and Eventuri intake, explaining their quality and performance advantages. The Seller specifically noted the two-tone PPF for aesthetic appeal, as well as the meticulous care of the vehicle, having only been serviced at one BMW location.
Negative: Some commenters like @zeus415 raised concerns regarding the discrepancy in mileage between the Carfax report and the listing. @1porsche_geek questioned the engine's condition given the reported mileage, indicating skepticism about potential strain on the power. @LongDucDong expressed dissatisfaction with BMW's current design language, although they acknowledged some positive notes about the vehicle's front end.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of nostalgia and positive comments from users like @Phillip_Shaffer and @Booker22, who fondly recall their experiences learning to drive in similar trucks. They appreciate the stunning Teal & White color combination highlighted by @boaboyoz, as well as the extensive rebuild work totaling nearly $25K mentioned by @jbeustace (The Seller) that enhances its driving capabilities. Many users are excited about the quality and sound of the truck, suggesting it has a robust build and a great handle on the road.
Neutral: Several comments focus on specific inquiries regarding the truck's features and history. @K51020Ranch asked for a driving video to get a better feel for the vehicle, and @REVSD inquired if the truck was originally a longbed. @PullG provided a detailed explanation concerning the VIN and its implications on the truck's build, while @jbeustace (The Seller) clarified concerns about the truck's history and offered to confirm details about its original configuration. Additionally, @jbeustace confirmed that the truck's tires are in excellent condition, supporting long drives without issues.
Negative: Some users expressed concerns about the truck's condition, specifically @topduarte, who wished the engine bay was cleaner. Others, like @barry1080 and @Idriveold2022, wanted confirmation about the functionality of the lights, gauges, and air conditioning, with subsequent reassurance from @jbeustace confirming that everything works well, especially noting the cold AC. These questions indicate that while the truck is loved, potential buyers are looking for assurance on its overall condition and reliability before making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @MrF1111 commented on the rarity of the vehicle, calling it a rare sight indeed. @RBailey57 praised it as a beautiful example of the fastest production car sold in 1957, while @0351antitanK expressed his admiration, exclaiming, "Good God, this is gorgeous!" @Raquila47 infused historical context, noting the Rebel's performance at Daytona Beach and its unique place in automotive history. @Dollycat3 described the vehicle's stylish design and color as absolutely beautiful, emphasizing its exceptional details. @buellwinkle agreed, wishing the new owners would be over the moon with their purchase, highlighting the vehicle's appeal in the AMC community. @Hoppy18 cheered on @Dollycat3's enthusiasm with a lighthearted comment that acknowledged the beauty of the car.
Neutral: @MLE requested information on the vehicle's operational status, including the functioning of various systems and additional photos. @gilbybarr noted the need for more historical context and expressed concerns about the undercoating that could be obscuring the car's true condition. @Rixx56 asked the seller to include more pictures with the windows down, reflecting a desire for more complete documentation of the car. @Mgilley (The Seller) responded to queries by providing additional photographs and confirming the working status of headlights and turn signals, while noting that some systems like the wipers and radio remained untested. @Fredsfleet shared a nostalgic reflection on his awareness of the model, expressing a wish for greater financial means to purchase such a fantastic vehicle.
Negative: @Middler89 expressed disappointment about the continental kit, indicating that it detracted from the car's value as an original muscle car. @MLE raised concerns about the vehicle's condition based on the angles of particular photos, questioning the fit of the hood and trunk lid. They also requested a thorough inspection of the windshield and glass for potential damage. @HooFhearted inquired about the presence of air horns in the trunk, hinting at potential concerns over the car's modifications. Additionally, @Mgilley (The Seller) clarified that the car has not undergone a frame-off restoration, but supports claims of it being solid and in great condition, while acknowledging the possibility of imperfections, such as the glass not being in pristine condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered interest from several commenters who appreciate its historical significance and unique engineering features. @Dollycat3 highlighted the 1951 Salmson S4-61 Saloon as an incredibly rare and beautiful car, noting its advanced engineering that showcases pre-war aviation influences. Others, like @Tom_S and @BikerWilly, expressed enthusiasm for the car's aesthetic and its details, urging that it finds a collector passionate about restoring such a rare project. Commenters also noted the potential for value appreciation if restored, with @USMCSam prompting discussions about its worth in the collector's market.
Neutral: Several participants shared observations regarding the vehicle's specifications and historical context, which shed light on its production and unique character. @Ranchero65 raised questions about the car's design and mechanical aspects, while @DSCitroen and @Lewis provided insights into the challenges faced by Salmson as a brand during the post-war era, linking its struggles with the tax laws affecting larger vehicles. The comments indicate a general curiosity about the car's provenance and the community's broader knowledge of lesser-known automobile manufacturers.
Negative: Despite the admiration for the car's uniqueness, several comments reflected concerns about its restorability and practical issues. @BikerWilly pointed out the difficulties in sourcing parts for such an old and rare brand, while @Frank_Barrett drew a humorous but poignant analogy between the vehicle and an unwanted pet, suggesting it may struggle to find a willing restorer. Some commenters, like @MarkS, lamented the likelihood of the car being restored far from its homeland, indicating skepticism about its future given the economic realities of car restoration in the region.
|
 |
Positive: @lildogeisasleep expressed that the vehicle is visually stunning, describing it as a blessing for the eyes. @Mike_Breinin shared enthusiasm for the LS swapped S30, stating it is an experience every car enthusiast should have and praised this model as nicer than his previous ones. @Beastlick noted that the vehicle is a great build that just might need some paint work down the line, wishing luck to all watching the auction.
Neutral: @swindham08 (The Seller) communicated uncertainties regarding the AC's functionality, clarifying that while air does circulate, it doesn't blow cold. The seller also mentioned that the Datsun has a reproduction OEM tank, but lacks headlight covers. @gumby74 raised concerns about the paint job from 2018-2019, citing visible flaws and potential issues with rust spraying.
Negative: @Revsrav questioned the extensive investment in the vehicle's body and paint work, wondering if it would look better in the long term and implying possible issues with rust treatment. @pete240z expressed disappointment that after all the investment, the vehicle's floors and frame rail were neither reinforced nor fixed. Additionally, @EricDuarte highlighted concerns about the frame's ability to handle the weight and power of the V8 engine.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's impressive attributes, particularly its original features and historical significance. @TimTralongo notes that the car has the optional T/A 6.6-liter 220 hp engine, which has garnered positive attention among enthusiasts like @uscmanrob who emphasize the value of such original specifications. @Longmire45 and @MTB414 both express admiration for the car's aesthetic, particularly its Solar Gold color and its connection to classic pop culture, suggesting it has a nostalgic appeal that resonates with many. Furthermore, @CarFoolLane appreciates the vehicle's originality, noting its well-preserved condition and adherence to classic design elements.
Neutral: Several comments provide clarifications and insights regarding the vehicle's specifications and history without expressing strong opinions. @Habu2 points out that the W72 option is visible on the build sheet, confirming the engine's horsepower, while @dcraig discusses the impact of emission regulations on engine options available in California. @DG78 raises questions about the vehicle's air conditioning functionality, indicating an interest in understanding the car's overall maintenance and condition. Others, like @CRJ900XJ, make inquiries about specific components, such as the original carburetor and rim specifications, suggesting that potential buyers are seeking detailed information.
Negative: There are some constructive criticisms regarding modifications and potential issues with the vehicle. @CarFoolLane expresses disappointment over the aftermarket radio installation, suggesting it detracts from the car's interior ambiance. There are concerns raised about the vehicle's air conditioning system and requested close-up photographs to assess specific areas of interest, as noted by @DG78. Additionally, @CRJ900XJ points out the absence of the shaker scoop block-off plate, implying possible past modifications that could affect the vehicle's authenticity and overall appeal to purists. These comments indicate that while the car has many selling points, there are concerns about modifications that could impact buyer interest.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, noting how much they would prefer it over newer BMW M models. @70_duster mentioned, "I would much prefer this over any new BMW M car. GLWTA!" Additionally, @IcemanBDub shared similar sentiments, stating, "Beautiful car, and GLWTA!" This enthusiasm reflects a general appreciation for the M3's design and performance among those familiar with the model.
Neutral: Many comments focused on the vehicle's potential issues, particularly concerning rod bearings and throttle body actuators. @SkippyR argued that rod bearing failures are exaggerated, sharing his personal experiences with various M3 models without encountering problems. Meanwhile, @Hugh_Jewnit and @IcemanBDub echoed this sentiment by discussing their ownership experiences with relatively trouble-free cars, stating that concerns are mostly directed toward pre-LCI models. However, this conversation about maintenance and performance indicates a cautious attitude among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's reliability, with @jb9573 recounting a personal experience where their E90 M3 engine failed due to a spun bearing. They emphasized that the risk of engine failure varies based on usage patterns and maintenance habits. In contrast, @boxeeh conveyed a different experience, claiming significant rod bearing wear after only 39,000 miles. This discrepancy highlights ongoing debates within the community about the reliability of the M3's engine, and some commenters like @drippocampus asked direct questions about whether critical components like throttle body actuators and rod bearings have been replaced, signaling apprehension around potential hidden issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Jeepmike praised the car as a "Beautiful Gen 1.5!" indicating a strong appreciation for its aesthetics and model specificity. @C3Lee highlighted the car's special features, noting it was one of three special variants from 1996, which may increase its desirability among collectors. Additionally, @SynchromeshWines expressed interest in receiving more information about the exhaust system and engine status, showing a positive engagement with the listing.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for clarification about the vehicle's engine replacement, particularly @Becauseracecar inquiring about the exhaust configuration and @TheFauker questioning whether the motor installed was rebuilt or used. @AldersonTX commented on the cleanliness of the vehicle but raised concerns over the uncertainty surrounding the engine's mileage and functionality. Conversations about the exhaust modifications from @C3Lee and @redtanrt10 pointed to the interest in understanding the implications of the vehicle's custom features, reflecting a neutral stance on the listing's details.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the lack of documentation regarding the car’s engine and service history, with @redtanrt10 stating it was an "odd listing" with minimal pictures and no service records. @kitocinj expressed suspicion over the absence of a photo with the top off and raised a question about a recall, indicating potential issues with trust in the seller. @Viper-dad noted factual inaccuracies regarding the vehicle's factory features, while @themexicanstig humorously questioned the timeliness of the photos, suggesting neglect or outdated information about the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle for its beautiful color combination and interior, considering it a wonderfully documented car. @Shawh agreed with this sentiment, emphasizing the aesthetics. @MichaelB330, a former owner of a similar model, described the car as one of the most honest offerings available, highlighting its minor cosmetic needs while affirming its overall good condition and reliable history.
Neutral: @markknofler (The Seller) acknowledged @MichaelB330's feedback, affirming that the car is indeed honest, with meticulous documentation and a rich history. He mentioned that the 190SL has had only three careful owners over 66 years, which speaks to its well-maintained condition. @Tony-Bologna raised questions about potential rust issues in the vehicle, specifically referencing a photo that appeared to show a hole, and inquired about the possibility of a driving video.
Negative: @Tony-Bologna pointed out concerns regarding rust, mentioning a rusty clamp and questioning whether the vehicle had any significant rust issues beyond surface-level concerns. Although @markknofler (The Seller) initially dismissed the idea of rot, he later admitted there was a small hole, showcasing an honest approach but also indicating a potential drawback for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @LesJohn expresses his admiration for the vehicle, stating that it embodies what an old truck should be. @Talon7 also compliments the truck, mentioning its classic style and inquiring about its electrical system, which shows an interest in the mechanics of the vehicle. Overall, these comments reflect a positive appreciation for the truck's vintage appeal.
Neutral: @Talon7 asks a technical question regarding whether the vehicle is a 6 volt or 12 volt system, indicating a curiosity about its specifications. @Sharpbuick55 expresses an interest in potentially bidding on the truck but requests a cold start and driving video to better assess its condition. Similarly, @Daviddsm echoes this sentiment, suggesting that a driving video would be helpful, thus maintaining a neutral stance while seeking more information.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided comments. All remarks are either positive appreciation or neutral inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and condition.
|
 |
Positive: The comments express a strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional pedigree and aesthetic appeal. @JHBBII praised the car as a gorgeous example, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @BlownV8 even added a humorous touch by alluding to the seller's relation to Chris Farley, emphasizing a personal connection to the car's impressive background. Additionally, @CC350 (The Seller) detailed how the car went through extensive refinements totaling over $45k, making it one of the best driving Panteras around, which many commenters recognize as a testament to its potential. Several users, like @Schmidlack, appreciated the tasteful modifications made to the vehicle, showcasing a blend of performance and style that resonates with enthusiasts.
Neutral: Conversely, some comments reflect general interest in technical aspects and personal opinions about the vehicle’s features. @ninavich and @mike_747 discussed tire sizes and wheel compatibility, indicating a thoughtful engagement with the car's setup. @DetomasoFan raised questions about the fuel gauge's functionality after viewing a cold start video, showing an interest in the car's operational status. The conversation highlighted the vehicle’s history and its connections to various automotive icons, such as its former use by the Aeronutronic division of Ford Aerospace mentioned by @Pcleez, adding to its allure in a more factual manner rather than an emotional one.
Negative: However, not all feedback was wholly positive. Some commenters, like @4CamGT, expressed personal preferences regarding aesthetic choices, such as preferring the original silver wheels over the current dark ones. Others, like @MaranelloBoy, indicated a preference for stock appearances, noting that while the modifications were tasteful, they still prefer vehicles in their original form. There were also concerns raised about specific aspects like the fuel gauge's accuracy as mentioned by @DetomasoFan, implying a need for clarity on the vehicle's condition which the seller addressed. Overall, while the car garnered much enthusiasm, there were notable concerns about certain modifications and specifications that some users felt were less than ideal.
|
 |
Positive: @HB92647 mentions that this vehicle ticks all the boxes, indicating that it meets various desirable criteria. @BMWE90Guy describes the exterior as possibly the nicest looking 911 they have seen, citing the attractive color combination and features. @m_ericks praises the tasteful specifications of the car, referring to it as pure class, while @Daanbstuart expresses excitement with a simple WOW. The general consensus about the exterior is favorable, with @Noahyjohn highlighting the incredible silver color and @Crummy_username finding it interesting to see a GTS with silver wheels, reflecting positive sentiments about the aesthetics and features of the car.
Neutral: @PrivateCollectionMotors (The Seller) provides important information about the auction process, mentioning that inspections should occur prior to bidding and outlining the assistance available for out-of-state buyers regarding shipping. There are exchanges about the car's specifications, such as the mentioning of the partially incorrect description of the car's light systems between @toadsalesman and @dontneedanothertruck. @Hangar52 inquires about the minor damage noted, and the Seller notes the existing clear bra and no paintwork on the vehicle, providing a neutral perspective on the condition of the car without extensive praise or criticism. The comments reflect a mix of admiration and requests for clarification.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's specification are raised, with @toadsalesman questioning the absence of the PDLS+ feature, despite initial assertions it might be present. @rbny asks for details about wear items and replacement status, which suggests apprehensions about maintenance, while @onehussler queries about major service completions, indicating a need for transparency that may not have been adequately addressed. Additionally, @AntennaLA raises doubts about the true color representation in the photos, highlighting skepticism regarding the car's visual presentation and prompting discussions about the accuracy of the imagery provided.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the 1969 Ford Mustang express admiration for its stunning features and attention to detail. Commentors like @toastedpirate praised the custom leather interior, calling it very nice and referring to the car as amazing. @Micro912 pointed out the eye-catching design aspects including color, stance, and wheels, adding that the build quality complements the overall look of the car perfectly. Many expressed excitement about its detailed restoration and modern upgrades while maintaining the classic charm of the Mustang, making it an object of desire for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several comments addressed practical aspects of the car, including inquiries about the air suspension ride height (@GregP1962) and air conditioning installation efforts (@csptrn). @Sjarvislv and @csptrn also raised questions regarding engine details and the condition of specific components, including wear on the steering wheel and seat that might not align with the reported mileage. The seller responded with clarifications on these points, including that the Mustang is set up for A/C and the wear is typical for such a vehicle, hinting at the car's usage since its build.
Negative: On the downside, some commentors raised concerns about specific issues and transparency regarding the car's condition. @Dtrain81 criticized a driving video for being lackluster, suggesting that it did not reflect the car's caliber well. @csptrn also noted discrepancies in the wear seen on the steering wheel and leather bolster compared to the mileage reported, questioning the wear patterns after such limited use. Overall, while many were excited about the car, there were significant queries about its actual condition and the completeness of the seller's information.
|
 |
Positive: @dannyluce63 (The Seller) presents the 2005 SL500 as a well-maintained vehicle with a clear history. It has had only two owners, remains garage-kept, and features a nearly flawless factory-applied paint finish and a well-preserved interior. The Seller invested around $3,000 to address common aging issues, including replacing the hydraulic pump for the retractable hardtop and refreshing the navigation and cluster displays, ensuring everything is in working order and presenting the car without any upcoming projects for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Waltguy and @UKCarnut, engaged with the Seller regarding the car's maintenance and condition. The Seller provided additional details regarding a local specialist who handled the LCD repairs and addressed concerns about the car's appearance, offering to retake photos in better lighting to capture the paint's condition. @Kynagidas expressed a common sentiment about bidding frustrations on the site, and the Seller reassured them about the resourceful nature of the platform and about finding potential bidders.
Negative: There were some concerns from users regarding visibility in the car's photos, leading @UKCarnut to inquire about any chips or major scratches. The Seller identified minor paint imperfections but emphasized the overall good condition of the vehicle. The question from @Benzbiz about the availability of two keys highlighted a potential concern for buyers about completeness in the sale. Overall, while the vehicle is presented positively, there are hints of necessary clarifications that could affect buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the stunning aesthetics and performance of the 2021 Audi R8 Performance Spyder Quattro, with @jwanner expressing amazement at its design and stating it is a 'perfect build.' @Plywood222222 praises the color and the engine, labeling it absolutely stunning. The seller, @howS, also emphasizes the striking looks and superb performance of the vehicle, noting extensive effort was put into capturing its beauty through photography to showcase its uniqueness.
Neutral: There are some neutral observations regarding the vehicle's ownership history, with @BasicE questioning the significance of having had five previous owners in just five years, and @Johnnn acknowledging the unusual number of owners and states in the car's history. @ascheler13 provides context to the owner count by suggesting the condition of the car is more important than its history, while also sharing insightful details about the rarity of the Merlin Purple color variant, suggesting this model might not emerge in the market again soon.
Negative: Negative sentiments are primarily concerned with the car's history of multiple owners. @BasicE highlights a potential concern about the implications of having five owners over five years, and @Johnnn echoes this by suggesting that there might be a story behind the car's extensive ownership and its travel across ten different states. @PanteraMike74 expresses confusion about the vehicle's model year, questioning the labeling as a 2017 in the drive-by video, which may raise concerns about its accuracy.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's design and performance potential, with @BigFigure describing it as "Beautiful" and @Nitro520 noting it as a "Nice car". Additionally, @ABog found it intriguing that the car is a race variant, calling it "Pretty cool S197!" The seller, @911r, provided detailed information about the auction process, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and customer service. This included links to videos that showcase the vehicle and its provenance, contributing positively to the auction experience.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle included inquiries regarding specifics like engine hours, usage history, and parts included in the sale. For instance, @Heavychevss asked about the engine's hours, while @Jimbo123 questioned whether the ProCal programmer comes with the car and requested a cold start video. The seller, @911r, responded to these queries with clarifications regarding the vehicle's features, such as the fuel type recommended for optimal performance, stating that it is typically high-octane race fuel or E85, and confirmed the inclusion of the ProCal programmer after consultations with the current owner.
Negative: On the downside, there were concerns regarding the lack of historical performance records, as @rjdayyat pointed out that it appeared the vehicle had made numerous passes but the seller could not confirm this due to a lack of documentation from previous ownership. @Nitro520 warned potential buyers to ensure they use the appropriate high-octane fuel to avoid engine issues, highlighting the risks associated with improper fueling. Additionally, the lack of information about certain vehicle features and modifications led to skepticism about its capabilities among some commenters.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong interest and admiration for the Porsche 911 listed by @RDSAutoGroup. Some users expressed their enthusiasm for the car's aesthetics with comments such as one user calling it a 'devilishly handsome Devon 993 C2S.' The seller responded positively to inquiries and showcased the car's features, confirming the vehicle's condition while indicating that they would provide additional information, such as paint readings and technical stickers, to facilitate transparency in the sale process.
Neutral: Several users, including @lottacar52 and @Leiniesbuddy, requested further details about the car, seeking specific images and technical information related to the engine and wheels. @RDSAutoGroup, the seller, acknowledged these requests and promised to provide more pictures and information. The discussions also included inquiries about the vehicle's paint meter readings and the presence of any potential missing parts, indicating a desire for thorough transparency and assurance regarding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There were some concerns and requests for clarification on specific details regarding the Porsche 911. Users like @BillG993 pointed out that the wrong sticker had been provided, indicating a potential issue with communication. Additionally, requests for paint meter readings and confirmation of the engine cover's availability were made, suggesting that there might be some uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's condition or completeness, which could detract from potential buyers' confidence.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its stunning color, Iridescent Emerald, with @GDogg calling it a 'magical color' and @1lotus1 expressing disbelief at its beauty. @Ravdey claims it's the best DB11 they've ever seen, while @LotusChappyS1 appreciates its high specifications. @DavilB supports the seller's claims about the quality after repairs and mentions the beauty of the spec. @thatkidfromjersey also highlights it as one of the nicest paint colors in the automotive world. The seller, @sharki81, asserts that the car looks flawless post-repair, emphasizing its like-new condition and low mileage.
Neutral: Commenters asked various questions about the car's details and service history. @GuinnessUSA inquired about the number of keys included with the vehicle, and @solomed wanted to know about the factory warranty status and service history. @JogDog78 pointed out a potential mismatch in the car's listed features. @porsche1986 asked for photos from the accident aftermath, indicating a need for clarity regarding the vehicle's history. Overall, these inquiries reflect genuine interest in ensuring the vehicle's legitimacy and maintenance status.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's repair history, notably @PJ-SB questioning the absence of accident details on Carfax after a reported $48k damage. The @TheAston user raised doubt about the repair invoice's legitimacy, suggesting it was suspiciously high without sufficient details. @porsche1986 requested proof of the accident damage, indicating skepticism about the seller's claims. Despite these concerns, @sharki81 has made several attempts to explain the repair circumstances and assert the vehicle's overall quality.
|
 |
Positive: @90sundevil remarked on the speediness of the listing, while @AVO72 praised the beautiful Yachting Blue color, suggesting it as an ideal choice for a Turbo S. Several others, including @GDogg and @Brutaltruth, echoed similar sentiments about the stunning build and color, indicating a general consensus that this vehicle is aesthetically pleasing. @trharlan described the car as muscular and handsome, and @Powerandart noted that there’s still time for bidders to appreciate its beauty. Additionally, comments from @GasolineAlleyGarage highlighted the uniqueness of the Yachting Blue and the overall sentiment suggests a high regard for the vehicle's visual appeal.
Neutral: Comments from various users acknowledged the car's appealing color and design. @BMWE90Guy expressed some hesitation about the price premium for the unique paint job, indicating that while the color is nice, it might not be worth the additional cost for all buyers. Likewise, @turbolou inquired about features the car might have, stating interest in adaptive cruise control and rain-sensing wipers, which tended to add to the information being sought about the vehicle's specifications. Overall, the comments presented a mix of appreciation and practical considerations about the car's features and marketability.
Negative: Some comments hinted at potential drawbacks of the vehicle. @scotty2293 suggested that Porsche should limit wheel color choices to silver, while @Brutaltruth questioned the lack of a front-end lift option, which was perceived as a potential shortcoming. @GasolineAlleyGarage specifically addressed these concerns, though these points may reflect some buyer apprehensions about certain feature omissions. There were also hints of regret from @dodgedemon18 regarding their previous decision to trade the car, showing that some owners might have mixed feelings about letting go of such a distinctive model.
|
 |
Positive: @ramsfan00 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its beautiful pictures and expressing desire, saying he loves the Boxster model. @King95 described the car as gorgeous and expressed anticipation for its auction success. Meanwhile, @MrBeeee characterized the car as a stunning example that improves with time and appreciated the detailed listing provided by the seller.
Neutral: @tkilpatrick (The Seller) provided a comprehensive overview of the car's history, including its garage-kept condition in Arizona, clean title, and recent service history which involved regular maintenance and brand new tires. @Vlad70 inquired about the car's ownership history and noted discrepancies in the CARFAX report while @Glenn930 and others discussed the technical differences between the Boxster GTS and S models to clarify misconceptions regarding features.
Negative: @jtee82 pointed out visible curb rash on the wheels in the listing's photos, raising concerns about the car's condition. @snowday questioned the absence of more in-depth tests, such as compression tests, while @rlhug1954 noted a lack of ventilated seats which he now finds essential in convertibles. The ongoing discussion among users about reported over-rev issues with the PDK transmission also indicates a level of apprehension regarding the vehicle's performance reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @zues56 expresses admiration for the car's design, particularly the swept back windshield, calling it a great feature. @Al_Swearengen finds the roadster appealing, noting it would make for an enjoyable cruising experience. @Greybeard2 highlights the vehicle as a tribute to a well-known classic, while @GLCC2017 (The Seller) confirms this and appreciates the recognition of the car's homage to Doane Spencer's HiBoy. @MichaelRyerson praises the vehicle as a stunning runner that successfully echoes a classic design. @mike_rockwell values the build quality, noting functional features like the exhaust placement and the vehicle's ability to run cool even when idling. @gasclass9 remarks on the traditional build and appreciates aesthetic details such as leather covers on the hood latches, indicating overall satisfaction with the car's design.
Neutral: @GLCC2017 (The Seller) clarifies details about the roof structure, explaining that it is a custom on/off style and not folding, while ensuring potential buyers that it can be easily handled by one person. Additionally, @GLCC2017 discusses the rear end of the car, correcting @mfrk by stating it has a Ford 9 inch rear-end with a 370 posie. He also provides information about the car's registration status in New York and reassures @Dhayes about the transfer process of ownership, confirming that a transferable registration will suffice in lieu of a title for vehicles pre-1973. @GLCC2017 also communicates with the community, thanking participants and providing additional photos, thus showcasing active engagement with potential and current buyers.
Negative: @mfrk expresses skepticism about the car's connection to the Doane Spencer model, arguing that their only similarity is the color. @3alarm seeks clarification about the roof's functionality, indicating some uncertainty about its practicality. Furthermore, @gasclass9 raises concerns about the inoperable tachometer and the lack of side curtains, suggesting that these might impact buyer interest. @Dhayes shows apprehension about the vehicle's registration status, indicating concern over potential challenges in obtaining a title for street use, reflecting a common worry among buyers about documentation and legalities.
|
Frick Studillac-Style, 365-Powered 1953 Studebaker Champion Regal Starlight Coupe
G1234586
Lot 238257
Dealer
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its stunning and unique design. @Dollycat3 describes it as 'absolutely stunning and incredible,' while @Raffi highlights its blend of beauty and power, expressing that the Coupe design enhances its performance. @buellwinkle appreciates the original design, calling it the best of the post-war era. Comments from @Kainahola and @jcole reflect on the car's forward-thinking design, noting its influence on other manufacturers and how it stood out in its time. @packardv8 also points out how the car draws crowds, emphasizing its distinctive appeal compared to modern luxury cars.
Neutral: Comments indicate that the vehicle has been well-engineered and its modifications have been thoughtfully executed. @Significant_Cars (The Seller) outlines the extensive restoration process, mentioning that the engine and transmission were rebuilt prior to installation, and that the car has been driven 5000 miles since. @ACStude raises several inquiries about the car's specifications and performance, which are addressed by the seller, who assures that the vehicle operates smoothly and features a high-quality paint job. The conversation touches on frame differences among Studebakers, which shows a deeper understanding of the vehicle's structure and history.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the vehicle's modifications and potential issues. @rovak235 questions whether the Commander coupes are a better build due to perceived frame strength, while @rickaz warns against altering a previously perfect model, hinting at the risk of declining performance with modifications. @Mr_Earl suggests that the value might have been affected by the previous owner's decisions to enhance the engine with hot rod parts, implying concerns about authenticity affecting market price. Additionally, @jcole discusses how rushing production affected the earlier models' quality, contributing to Studebaker's declining sales.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express excitement and fondness for the vehicle, highlighting its nostalgic value and unique build quality. @Big_Rig remarked on the car's aesthetic appeal, stating he couldn't stop staring at it, while @TangerineDream showed appreciation, recalling how much they loved their own car from that era. @red1997 shared their own positive experiences with G2 Integras, describing them as fun cars, which further adds to the general enthusiasm portrayed by the community.
Neutral: The comments also reflect a practical aspect, with @Hdjoe seeking clarification about specific features like the transmission type, LSD compatibility, and heating. @mphjr inquired about the availability of cold start and driving videos, to which the seller, @SHIFTAUTOMOTIVE, confirmed that videos would be posted shortly. Additionally, @BananaBreadPerformance questioned fuel requirements, which the seller promptly addressed by confirming compatibility with regular pump gas after some adjustments.
Negative: However, there are some concerns raised, particularly about the limitations of the vehicle. @Hdjoe's comment on the absence of air conditioning and power steering hints at potential shortcomings for everyday driving. Moreover, @BananaBreadPerformance's inquiry about fuel suggests apprehension regarding the maintenance of performance standards. Overall, while the community generally views the vehicle positively, these practical queries reflect an awareness of potential downsides for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @LexusFanboy commented that they have seen the car driving around town and described it as absolutely gorgeous, stating that the photos do not do it justice. @ARSHAH also appreciated the car, offering a supportive remark on its appearance. @Jasonmcb (The Seller) highlighted the history and smooth performance of the vehicle, saying that it can drive well at speeds up to 70 mph without issue, emphasizing its reliability and fun factor as a ride.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussion about the appearance and specs of the vehicle. @Boeingpilot and @daveydad noted their observation that the front end appears to sit high, which prompted @Jasonmcb (The Seller) to explain that this design feature was intentional by VW. @coppertop666 suggested that gas charged shocks could be raising the front the way it appears and mentioned the option of replacing those if necessary. Comments on the vehicle's previous sale hinted at mixed feelings, such as @innercitymini explaining prior sale issues and @feynmanfan indicating the car fits the needs of someone who enjoys driving and tinkering with vehicles.
Negative: @Fargin questioned why the car was being sold so soon, indicating a potential concern about the seller's intentions. @racerock expressed skepticism about the car's appearance, describing the stance as excessively 'squat' compared to the factory model and suggested that it may require adjustments to return it to its original state. This raised doubts among potential buyers concerning the car's condition and adjustments needed for optimal performance.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed great enthusiasm for the 2019 ZR1, noting the beautiful design and overall quality of the car. @Michaelschnur highlighted it as another excellent offering from Schwieters Chevrolet. @Plywood222222 called it the most perfect ZR1 they have ever seen, appreciating both the color and the fact that it has been driven. Several participants, such as @badcad and @70sNamVette, emphasized the car's iconic status and value, believing someone could acquire it without spending excessively, especially in the context of a no-reserve auction.
Neutral: Various commenters, including @HorizonIDX and @johnjm, discussed the dynamics of the auction, particularly the limited early bidding activity and the implications of having no reserve. @Schwieters99, the seller, actively engaged with bidders, providing transparency and encouraging questions. The seller acknowledged the unique appeal of the car, mentioning how the automatic transmission option was likely a response to previous market insights regarding the desirability of performance and convenience in modern sports cars.
Negative: Concerns were raised about certain aspects of the auction and vehicle specifications. @MarkJensen75 expressed discontent with dealer document fees and questioned how the lack of a ZKT package might affect the auction's outcome. @DIP51 noted the risky nature of a no-reserve auction, admitting to discomfort with the uncertainty it creates. Additionally, @topduarte and @manofmanuals shared reservations about the automatic transmission, suggesting a preference for a manual option might limit broader appeal, despite acknowledging its power.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's stunning condition and rarity, with @Amrashid noting how quickly things escalated in the auction. @Plastics17 expresses a wish for the financial means to bid, reflecting the admiration for this iconic car. Enthusiasts like @Jazman and @SupraFreak call it a 'holy grail,' while @autenil marvels at its low mileage and original components, declaring it a 'sexy beast.' The overall consensus is that this Supra is a desirable collector item, with @danc (The Seller) providing insights into its well-maintained history and appreciative community interactions.
Neutral: Some comments discuss the subjective nature of pricing for vehicles like this Mk4 Supra. @oqzone brings up the inconsistencies in pricing across different examples, while @dogmanluther gives a breakdown of what factors generally influence value, such as mileage, condition, and owner history. Others, like @B97 and @caboguy101, express appreciation for the car's beauty without offering strong opinions. There's a recognition that while this car holds significant appeal, other examples may vary widely in perceived value and condition.
Negative: There are a few concerns raised in the comments as well. @ZR1ZR1ZR1 questions the car's inactivity since 2015, implying potential issues with its maintenance during that time. @dogmanluther brings up some rust concerns in his nostalgic recollection, suggesting this car isn't without its flaws. @autenil raises a query about extra wires connected to the battery, hinting at possible modifications or unknown histories that could affect desirability. Overall, while the car is celebrated, some commenters remain cautious, acknowledging that even prized vehicles like this one can have potential shortcomings.
|
 |
Positive: @XRDV8 (The Seller) has presented the Norton Commando as the best sorted of the four he has owned. He mentions it starts with one or two kicks or just the push of a button, and everything on it works without fluid leaks. @MCO_97 praises the bike as a great example of British engineering, calling it one of the nicest Nortons he has seen. Additional positive remarks come from @jackmjason, who describes it as one of the nicer modified Nortons on BaT, and appreciates the refreshing candor of the seller. Overall, commenters generally admire the styling and ergonomics of the bike.
Neutral: Several commenters are engaged in a discussion about the bike's components and modifications, with @MCO_97 inquiring about the tools necessary for maintenance, while @2hecknback notes that although it has sporty intent, it isn't quite a cafe racer yet. @John_B comments on the bike's customizations, clarifying the differences between this model and the rare Kenny Dreer VR880 Sprint Specials. @lazyeye6 raises questions about the electric starter conversion and speculates about the bike’s origins, showing a level of interest without clear judgment about its value or quality.
Negative: On the less favorable side, @cNw points out possible modifications to the rear frame, suggesting that it may not be entirely stock. @John_B also expresses skepticism about the bike's claims, explaining that while it is a nice custom Commando, it lacks the performance enhancements of the VR880. Another user, @Alfabits, reinforces this by clarifying that the bike is not a VR880, voicing concerns about misleading interpretations of its origins. These comments indicate some doubt among users regarding the authenticity and full historical context of the bike.
|
 |
Positive: @Scott68GTO describes the car as a head-turner, noting its charm and appeal. @goldengup expresses delight at seeing the car, calling it sweet and honest, while @JohnF1966 appreciates the originality of the paint, valuing the wear and patina over a hyper-restored car. @GregOwens labels it a great survivor, and @BangScreech442 confirms that the photographs depict the car authentically and in good condition. Furthermore, @braktrcr remarks on the originality of the rear shocks and praises the car's design and construction adhering to GM's improvements in safety features from previous years.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers also abound, with @Europeansportscar inquiring about the refurbishment details and whether repainting was done. @buddy8746 ponders the apparent existence of factory cruise control on a manual transmission, to which @goodlife (The Seller) confirms its rarity and operational status. Additional inquiries from @Marty_57 focus on the underside and frame condition while @Jonfrancis raises concerns about possible rust, leading to a detailed response from the seller, who reassures that the frame is solid with no rust issues. Other queries include requests for videos of the car's operations and clarifications on specific parts, suggesting a strong interest in the car’s functionality.
Negative: Despite the overall positive impressions, some concerns are expressed. @TexasOutlaw13 notices what appears to be a patch in the oil pan in one of the images, while @karfever asks about the Hurst emblems' adherence and potential damage from removal. @bali389 requests clarification on whether the trunk area has been restored, reflecting a keen interest in understanding the vehicle's history and authenticity. Additionally, @63novass inquires about the operational status of various electrical components, demonstrating apprehension regarding the car's functionality although the seller assures that everything operates properly.
|
 |
Positive: @Ataka (The Seller) emphasizes the ease of importing the vehicle to the US, noting that it can go back tariff-free due to its US-made status. The seller has made logistics straightforward for Canadian and worldwide buyers by stating they can assist with export/import processes and has had the vehicle inspected by CG Motorsports, a reputable BMW shop. The vehicle is described as being well-maintained, with a responsive Andream Wireless MMI system that enhances the interior experience, making it feel modern and functional for users.
Neutral: Several commenters, like @Mr_White, inquire about the oil change intervals and the vehicle's import status, indicating some uncertainty about the specifics. @mezgerboy provides clarity on the vehicle's US origin through the NHTSA database, confirming that it can be imported with minimal hassle. The comments show a dialogue among potential buyers about features and maintenance history without presenting any glaring red flags about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the lack of specific information, such as the fuel injectors' history and whether the speedometer needs conversion to miles. @Alec0717 raises a question about the injectors, prompting @Ataka to confirm there are no replacement records, yet the current state of the injectors appears fine. Additionally, @thefella is interested in any lingering odors, signaling caution on potential hidden issues, which were reassured by @Ataka with a zero-smoke history in the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle, emphasizing its beauty and uniqueness. @pwinters enthusiastically shares their excitement about the motorcycle, while @XRDV8 asks about potential running videos, indicating interest in the bike's performance. @ripper996 fondly recalls memories associated with classic motorcycle dealerships, further signing off on the emotional connections that enthusiasts form with such vehicles. The seller, @Daniel_H, is commended for the transparency in sharing the history of the bike, revealing it to be a well-preserved time capsule with all relevant documentation.
Neutral: The conversation also covers practical aspects of the bike's condition, including concerns raised by @ripper996 about the foggy headlight. @YourMateNate provides insights into the commonality of cloudy headlights and suggests a solution for cleaning it, showcasing a cooperative exchange among commenters about vehicle maintenance. Additionally, @Rob_P inquires about the registration status of the motorcycle, illustrating the importance of legal considerations in the buying process, while @KatieK0312 asks for a cold start video, reflecting an interest in the bike's operational capabilities.
Negative: Some comments highlight concerns regarding the motorcycle's condition. @ripper996 questions the seller about the cloudy headlight problem and suggests it may need replacement, noting that the cost for a new headlight fixture is steep at $1100. @Daniel_H addresses these concerns directly, explaining the philosophy behind his handling of a 'time capsule' bike, which includes minimal restoration to preserve its authenticity. This indicates that while the motorcycle has been preserved, there are some necessary repairs that could be seen as drawbacks to prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Jalen59 shares his excitement about the H1, highlighting its unique presence on the road and its strong performance. He describes it as an 'absolute beast of a rig' that attracts attention everywhere he goes. According to @Jalen59, the vehicle is in excellent mechanical condition, with only minor cosmetic corrosion above the driver door. He encourages potential buyers to reach out with questions and offers the option for in-person viewings, emphasizing his active role during the auction process.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @jwknight and @beaverdam213, inquire about specific features and functionalities of the vehicle, such as the condition of the gauges and interior electronics. @Jalen59 responds that while one of the fuel gauges reads empty, the rest are functioning properly, and he confirms that a driving video will be available soon, highlighting the responsiveness of the seller to potential buyer concerns. Another user, @Osramicus, speculates on the purpose of the extra hitch receivers, indicating they could be used for camping or tailgating, while @Real4wd provides insights into the historical uses of recovery points on the vehicle.
Negative: @Real4wd raises concerns about the non-factory extra receiver hitches, questioning their impact on the off-road capability of the H1. The commenter suggests that while they can be useful for transporting extra gear, they may pose issues when navigating obstacles. In exchange for these concerns, @Jalen59 admits uncertainty regarding their original purpose, acknowledging that they might be aftermarket additions. This interaction reflects a lack of clarity around certain modifications on the vehicle that could be seen as potential drawbacks.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the positive aspects of the vehicle, noting it as the "greatest SUV ever built" (@samc517) and complimenting its color combination, low mileage, and cleanliness. The seller, @SRTAMG150, emphasizes the care taken in servicing the vehicle, describing it as being cosmetically clean with a deep shine and minimal swirls. Additionally, @TAG appreciates its very clean underside and mentions features like heated seats, indicating a high quality and luxurious feel to the car. Multiple comments mention the Cayenne's reliability and good service history, reinforcing its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: @SRTAMG150 provides a thorough overview of the auction details, encouraging bidders to contact the seller for further inspections and shipping quotes. The seller mentions that the vehicle has been serviced regularly and assures prospective buyers about the status of important components, like the coolant pipes and other known issues, being addressed. @rodnpowell shares personal ownership experience, acknowledging the vehicle's performance while also noting a few common issues to be aware of, thus providing balanced insights into the car's overall status and history.
Negative: On the downside, @rodnpowell raises concerns about the notorious fuel pump failures and issues with plastic coolant pipes, suggesting potential ongoing maintenance needs for the model. Additionally, despite the seller's assurance regarding the car's condition, some commenters like @TAG express skepticism about the longevity of certain components, such as the ignition coils, which are notoriously prone to failure. The presence of some curb rash on the rims is also a minor point of contention, indicating that while the car is clean, it might have a few cosmetic imperfections that could affect its overall appeal.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle for its appealing features and aesthetics. @CRUSH expressed appreciation for the wagon's coolness and its long roof, while @70_duster loved the color, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Frank69 and @RMQ333 shared their admiration for the car's color combination and its overall presentation, with @JWHBOOMER reminiscing about the nostalgia associated with Malibu’s, highlighting their rarity and appeal. Many, including @Longmire45 and @sourdough, noted the owner's dedication to the car, with comments reflecting confidence in its quality.
Neutral: Several comments offered insights into various aspects of the vehicle without strong opinions. @68CamaroSS396L78 raised questions about the condition of the rear wheel well and the spare tire well, sparking discussion among users about potential repairs and factory design features. @Jersey_Joe (The Seller) responded to these inquiries, clarifying the factory features of the wagon and acknowledging the speedometer's incorrect reading at freeway speeds, indicating it was something he planned to fix. @broodie and @Harrdware provided informative remarks about the air conditioning setup and the wagon's history, respectively, which were appreciated by the community.
Negative: There were some concerns voiced regarding the car that generated a mix of caution among potential buyers. @charlesmaraia pointed out coloration issues in the paint, while @68CamaroSS396L78 indicated poorly executed repairs on the spare tire well. @efanch echoed an interest in seeing more photos of the affected areas for transparency. Meanwhile, @sliproc had a somewhat harsh take, categorizing the vehicle in a negative light, hinting there are vehicles of both 'first' and 'none' class, suggesting that this one might not meet quality expectations.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are highly praising the vehicle, with many noting that it possesses a stunning aesthetic and quality upgrades. @Big_nol described it as beautiful, while @MWCRLN appreciated the good looks of the car. @69classix complimented the stance and tasteful upgrades, calling it a well-done example of the model. @JGraham emphasized the clean condition of the E30 and its impressive enthusiast maintenance, while commenting on the lack of cracks in the interior leather. The overall consensus is that this is an attractive car that will please any new owner.
Neutral: The seller, @HKap1, provided detailed insights into the vehicle's history and condition. They confirmed that while the car has been garage-kept and rust-free, the mileage mentioned in the listing might not reflect the actual count as they have driven it approximately 210 miles since December 2021. There was noted confusion surrounding the odometer readings, as some commentators pointed out variances. @HKap1 explained the discrepancies in mileage reporting standards used by the auction site and acknowledged some minor issues with the automobile.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, several concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @OBXboyee pointed out wiring issues visible in images, and @db240z asked about potential floor pan damage, which @HKap1 confirmed. Additionally, there were questions about the vehicle's ABS disconnection, which @HKap1 stated was inherited from prior ownership. The odometer failure became a significant point of discussion, with comments from @iannfld suggesting that the odometer gears may need replacement. Overall, while the car attracted many admirers, it also drew scrutiny regarding its functionality and history.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's excellent condition and lack of smoke odor, with @genevamotorcars confirming that there is no evidence of previous smoking, reassuring @l.brasi34 of the vehicle's cleanliness. The seller also provides responsive feedback, including a road test video to address inquiries. Additionally, @sparkybz later acknowledges that the initially perceived bumper gap issue was misleading based on lighting conditions, indicating satisfaction with the vehicle's appearance.
Neutral: Several users seek additional information about the vehicle's history and specific details, such as the year of the tires, the kind of fluids present around the wheels, and the vehicle's trade-in details, indicating an interest in verification rather than outright concern. @l.brasi34 particularly scrutinizes the car's mileage history and usage over the years, while other commenters question about maintenance and potential leaks, to which @genevamotorcars provides thorough responses.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's condition are raised, particularly by @sparkybz, who notes inconsistencies in bumper fitting, suggesting possible damage or adjustment needs. Despite @genevamotorcars' reassurances that the gaps are consistent and attributable to angles and shadows, the exchange reflects some persistence from @sparkybz regarding the accuracy of these assessments. Additionally, @chattanooga questions the presence of any leaks based on water observed during the photo session, revealing ongoing uncertainty among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the Lotus Elise, highlighting its uniqueness and driving experience. @IDEngineer commented that the future winner of the auction would be extremely happy with their purchase, while @slippedfault advised anyone interested to take a chance on it and truly enjoy the car. @Gracie1 called it a beautiful example of Lotus engineering, emphasizing that it is a driver's car. Additionally, @6TVRs and @unoor shared their personal experiences, revealing that the Elise gives a thrilling performance and is enjoyable at all speeds, making it unlike any other vehicle. @sweetcars, the seller, also noted the special features of this vehicle and its rarity, confirming key details and appreciation for the car's design.
Neutral: Several commenters discussed the auction dynamics and shared practical considerations surrounding the car. @Toddski requested images of the car's underside, showing a typical buyer's concern for thorough inspection before purchase. @IDEngineer pointed out that the real bidding often takes place right before auction end, while @Duke_Audi echoed this sentiment, demonstrating an understanding of common auction behaviors among experienced buyers. @6TVRs brought up the need for confirmation regarding specific options like the Limited Slip Differential, reflecting a practical, yet curious side of the community. The seller responded positively to these inquiries, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers and address their concerns.
Negative: There were some minor concerns raised regarding the vehicle's condition and possible miscommunication. @gmonkee expressed initial disappointment in the driving video's presentation, noting the driver seemed bored at first, only to later display joy while driving. @6TVRs pointed out the scrapes on the front bumper's PPF and expressed skepticism about certain options on the vehicle, which highlights the cautious nature of some buyers when it comes to the accuracy of listings. @sweetcars addressed this concern directly, clarifying that the scrapes were beneath the film to maintain transparency with bidders. These comments underscore the importance of clear communication and honesty in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: @Cblueguy (The Seller) has done a commendable job with the car, highlighting that the body wiring is fully functional with all lights operational. The car runs and drives well, with only a few finishing touches needed to make it a solid vehicle. The owner is proactive about addressing inquiries from potential buyers and plans to share running videos and performance specs soon, which shows a commitment to transparency and eagerness to showcase the car's features.
Neutral: Commentors are actively discussing aspects of the vehicle's performance and components. @Hurstolds1442 suggested obtaining a running or driving video, while @jesterdcv inquired about specific technical details such as the TREMEC 5-speed transmission and compression ratio. @RMQ333 commented on the color combo being interesting, but noted it was unusual, highlighting varying perspectives on the car's design.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns, particularly regarding the vehicle's wiring and parts. @ICTGOAT questioned the wiring project's categorization, and @ZeGerman criticized the use of rubber fuel hose along the vehicle's length. Additionally, @jesterdcv and others expressed the need for more information on possible repairs and specifications, suggesting that potential buyers might be wary of underlying issues.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express a strong interest in the vehicle, particularly @Dturtle6, who reminisces about their experience with the SC430 and appreciates the seller's prompt sharing of pictures and video content. @hwy68 adds that cars like this have a dedicated following and are valued for their reliability, emphasizing the enjoyable driving experience, backed by personal testimony from @Dturtle6, who praises the quality of the vehicle based on previous ownership.
Neutral: The auction atmosphere has also prompted discussions around bidding strategies, with observers like @Mookdi and @Chico1 commenting on the competitive nature of the bids. @PmUZI and @Lexday47 engage in dialogue about the dynamics of the bidding process, noting the thrill of the auction and the strategies involved among bidders. The seller, @Autopex, remains active in addressing inquiries and providing requested information, which keeps the conversation flowing.
Negative: Contrasting opinions emerge regarding the valuation of the vehicle, particularly from @Dturtle6, who challenges the perceived popularity of the SC430 as an asset. They suggest that many bidders are overpaying and frame the car as a depreciating asset. This prompts a defense from @hwy68, who argues that while the SC430 may not appreciate like a classic car, it still holds significant value among enthusiasts, citing a lack of depreciation in the market for such vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle, noting its maintenance history and ease of operation. @oakcitymotorsnc, the seller, assured that the truck drives straight like new and has been maintained for government use, emphasizing its reliability and good condition. @Gettyupgo mentioned their past experience with similar trucks, highlighting their fun nature and ease of work, suggesting that whoever wins the auction will enjoy the vehicle. The seller also emphasized that the truck is street legal and can be registered like a regular car, which shows confidence in the vehicle's compliance with regulations.
Neutral: There were several inquiries that focused on gathering more information about the truck rather than expressing strong opinions. @letthegypsyhaveit asked detailed questions regarding the vehicle's condition, including the steering alignment, tire age, functionality of the horn, and the necessity for maintenance. @chaskitchen inquired about the removal of the sirens and lights as well as the preferred transport company for shipping the vehicle, indicating a practical interest in logistics. @Ackmac17 asked about potential registration issues and insurance, seeking clarity on the vehicle's legality in Florida.
Negative: A few comments hinted at potential concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @letthegypsyhaveit raised a question about the steering alignment, suggesting it might veer left instead of going straight, which could imply an underlying issue that may need addressing. Although the seller responded confidently that the vehicle drives well, such inquiries reflect a degree of skepticism from potential buyers. There was also a note of uncertainty from @MarkKuhnIV regarding the water pump, as the seller stated they couldn't demonstrate its operation due to the lack of a water source, which might raise doubts about that feature's functionality.
|
 |
Positive: Numerous comments praise the vehicle's excellent condition, especially highlighting its low mileage of 15,000 and impressive aesthetic appeal. @GoBoGo remarked on its 'perfect looking condition' and encouraged others to place their bids, while @Jonesy66 expressed enthusiasm for the V10 engine and the low mileage. Additionally, @Vitovillani41 and @BavarianHotwheels shared positive thoughts on its suitability as a family summer cruiser, noting the spaciousness and comfort for children.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on specific details about the vehicle and its history. @Gregt909 inquired about the original tires and whether the seller had both keys and the window sticker. @patrickongena raised concerns about the vehicle's long period without licensing in Texas, which prompted @Walkertx (The Seller) to explain that the car had been stored and only driven 161 miles since 2019. The seller also confirmed the features like soft-close doors and provided updates regarding the battery and fuel levels.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were raised by @Gregt909 regarding potential issues with the dash leather starting to bubble up, while @Revsrav noted the tires' age as a potential red flag, suggesting they may be original and rather old. There were also inquiries about the warning lights on the dashboard, indicating the seller may need to address some maintenance issues to ensure potential buyers feel confident about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's condition and historical significance. @heritagegallery (The Seller) noted that the truck has only 6,915 original miles and has been largely untouched for decades, while @CRUSH remarked on how incredible it is to see such a vintage truck. @JayKay2430 echoed this sentiment, highlighting the historical tagline of Chevy trucks and calling this vehicle a time capsule. That was also reflected by @Chamba, who expressed nostalgia for simpler trucks like this one, contrasting it with modern high-tech vehicles.
Neutral: Some users sought clarification about the vehicle's features and overall maintenance. @djac70 inquired about the 'Operating Convenience Package,' which @heritagegallery (The Seller) explained includes power windows and door locks. Others, like @Flyautoworks, requested confirmation on whether the paint was original, to which @heritagegallery (The Seller) confirmed it is indeed the original factory paint with only a small touch-up on the tailgate.
Negative: However, there were comments concerning maintenance and potential issues. @jdjonesdr criticized the seller for not addressing the A/C system and suggested that it could have been recharged with minimal expense. @99duelly raised concern about the dark condition of the brake fluid, prompting a response from @heritagegallery (The Seller) that emphasized the fluid had darkened with age due to limited usage, suggesting a full service before regular use. @565FatRat noted a desire for more horsepower, which brought a counterpoint from @Discobob, who advocated for keeping the truck in its original state.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive specifications and performance capabilities. @Fairmont663336 remarked on the powerful three-liter Cosworth V8 engine, stating, "This thing GOES!" This enthusiasm was echoed by @SLKDragon who noted the car's speed, comparing it favorably to top-tier racing series. Additionally, @OilInBlood praised the collection of spare parts, indicating a strong sense of value and completeness in the offering.
Neutral: Several comments included questions regarding the car's specifications and usability. @Inthepasture raised inquiries about the engine's installation date and condition of the spare engine while @KrisKringle asked about the car's weight and aerodynamic capabilities. The seller, @OlderGet-FasterWas, provided thorough responses, confirming the engine's new status and detailing the weight and downforce capabilities, which contributed to an informative dialogue about the vehicle's characteristics and performance metrics.
Negative: Despite the overall excitement, some commenters expressed caution regarding the car's suitability for inexperienced drivers. @formularacer cautioned that this vehicle is not for beginners, suggesting that it is best suited for those with experience in open-wheel racing to transition into Formula Nippon or similar series. Further discussions emphasized the potential difficulty of handling such a powerful vehicle, as @GLTL noted that these cars were just a step below F1, highlighting the advanced skill required to drive them effectively.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @KCDOYLE calling it a "fantastic looking truck" and @98SNAKEEATER describing it as a "beautiful rig." Others highlighted its rarity, with @BlackMountainMotorworks (The Seller) emphasizing that a clean, low-owner, triple-locked 80 series is hard to find. @stevecrea shared a personal story about their own Land Cruiser, reinforcing the vehicle's impressive build quality. Overall, the sentiment reflects a strong appreciation for the vehicle's condition, history, and capability.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about specific features and details regarding the vehicle's condition. @eriedickinson inquired about the shaking side mirrors, to which @BlackMountainMotorworks (The Seller) provided a common quirk of these models and solutions available. @805Trueblood asked about the nature of touch-ups on the paint, and @Forrest27 followed up on the availability of OEM bumpers, indicating a practical interest in maintaining or enhancing the vehicle's appearance. These queries suggest an informed engagement with potential buyers while reflecting a general acknowledgment of the vehicle's appeal.
Negative: There were a few concerns raised about the vehicle's service history and minor issues, with @JayZee77 asking about various components such as the heater tees, potential fluid leaks, and steering play. @Guzzarmm humorously considered the vehicle as a potential gift for a milestone birthday, suggesting that while the vehicle is attractive, it may also involve considerations one would expect from a 30-year-old car. Additionally, @BlackMountainMotorworks (The Seller) addressed these concerns, noting typical aging characteristics and assuring that most aspects of the vehicle were well-maintained, helping to ease potential buyers' worries.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic and its overall condition. @slowN54 called it a "beautiful car" and wished the seller good luck with the sale. @spw9659 remarked that "wagons are cool again" and shared a personal experience of receiving numerous compliments on a similar car, highlighting the desirability of the model. @jgraham praised the color combination and displayed enthusiasm for the vehicle, reinforcing the positive sentiment surrounding the listing.
Neutral: The seller, @HatzCB1, described the vehicle in detail, emphasizing its stunning color combination and well-maintained history in a favorable climate. They offered to address any concerns regarding its operation, particularly the sunroof issue, and reassured potential buyers about the car's smog compliance due to its stock condition. Other comments brought up various aspects of the car, such as the 6-speed automatic transmission and the rarity of the model on the market at this time.
Negative: A few concerns were raised by commenters, with @Fargie questioning whether the BMW would pass California smog checks, to which @HatzCB1 confirmed it was stock and did not have exhaust modifications. Additionally, @KROD inquired about the rear sunroof mechanism, highlighting an issue that previously required the removal of the sunroof shade. This suggests potential repair challenges that could impact buyer interest or decision-making.
|
13k-Mile 1995 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo Stillen SMZ 5-Speed
JN1CZ24D6SX570366
Lot 238239
Private Party
 |
Positive: @ZFreakZ32 expressed excitement with a simple "Let’s go!" while @ravenspilot referred to the vehicle as their "favorite SMZ example." @Robz370z joined in with a light-hearted tone, indicating they're excited for the auction with popcorn ready. @ravenspilot emphasized the strong start of the auction and wished good luck with the phrase "GLWTA!" Many users echoed similar sentiments, with @zdoctor expressing enthusiasm about the low mileage of the car and looking forward to the auction outcomes. @the_car_museum provided insight into the collector market, noting that this vehicle falls within a historically significant pricing bracket, which may explain the strong interest and bids received. @LongDucDong shared a nostalgic driving experience, describing their joy while driving the car in the late 90s, highlighting its lasting appeal.
Neutral: Some comments reflected on the vehicle's specifications and features rather than outright opinions. @SMZ027 (The Seller) mentioned including two original fobs with keys and an extra key, noting these details are often valued by collectors. @senorrobot brought up the topic of titanium keys in Nissan vehicles, indicating that they were discontinued during production, which @Only1Z confirmed with accurate historical knowledge. Furthermore, @drk93tt reflected on the auction's previous bidding history and the reserve price in context, suggesting that there are reasonable expectations for future bids in the upcoming auctions.
Negative: However, not all responses were purely positive. @Laxxer78, while acknowledging the car's beauty, stated they were "out," suggesting a lack of interest in bidding. Additionally, @rmp5s pointed out that the situation escalated quickly, perhaps indicating some concerns regarding the auction dynamics. There was also a hint of skepticism from @drk93tt who commented on the intriguing reserve status from the last auction, suggesting some uncertainty about the vehicle's perceived value despite the enthusiasm surrounding it. Overall, while the vehicle received a lot of excitement, there were mixed feelings regarding its auction journey.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover TD6 Diesel highlight its exceptional luxury, off-road capabilities, and impressive diesel engine performance. @Jpreston123 (The Seller) emphasizes its excellent service history, the outstanding features such as Four-Zone Climate Comfort Pack, Panoramic Roof, and Terrain Response 2, all of which contribute to a smooth and confident driving experience. The seller notes that this vehicle has been meticulously maintained, with no warning lights, unusual noises, or leaks, indicating it is ready for immediate enjoyment. The presence of a detailed photo gallery and plans for walk-around and driving videos also reflect the owner’s enthusiasm for showcasing the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Some commenters raised specific questions about the vehicle's maintenance and features, including @henryr asking about the timing belts and @8000rpm inquiring about the presence of a tow hitch. @-G- requested information on potential paintwork evidence and any odors, while @jolasoli brought up concerns regarding sunroof drains and possible leaks or corrosion. In response, @Jpreston123 confirmed the vehicle is free of paintwork and odors, while also addressing the service needs related to the timing belts and discussing the absence of a factory hitch, providing reassurance regarding the vehicle's upkeep and the options available for improvements.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, there are concerns raised about the timing belt service, with @Jpreston123 noting there are no records indicating it has been completed. The potential cost for this service has been highlighted at around $1200-$1500. Furthermore, @jolasoli's question about the sunroof drains signifies an awareness of a known design flaw that could imply future maintenance issues, although no evidence of leakage or corrosion was reported. While the seller maintains a solid reputation and provides clarifications, the need for upcoming servicing and the lack of certain features like a tow hitch may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @ohnoitsericgo mentions that despite the car not being an extremely mint example, it could present a very good daily driver deal based on the current auction interest. @DetomasoFan appreciates that it's refreshing to see a car that has been driven, suggesting that it would make a great driver in coastal areas like Hawaii, where such conditions are typical. The seller, @dshak, helps to support this positive perspective by sharing details about the car being smogged and providing a smog certificate, which adds to the car's credibility as a reliable vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments raise questions regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @jrosene inquires if any maintenance was conducted before the sale, such as an oil change or fuel drainage. @GMHan seeks clarification on the 'No-start/hard start condition' mentioned in the carfax record from November 2018. @deeyee08 asks about the presence of all 10 VIN stickers, indicating interest in the car's authenticity. Additionally, @dshak acknowledges these inquiries, providing updates about the depth of issues and clarifications on the mechanical condition.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition are expressed by multiple commenters. @Batfan2 notices corrosion in the engine bay due to salty air, while @blurtt points out potential overspray issues on the undercarriage and rusting bolt heads. @DasBooost raises alarms regarding the timing chain tensioner, implying it may be a problem area due to a ticking sound, and reflects overall doubts about the vehicle's mechanical integrity. Overall, these comments suggest caution for potential buyers as they consider the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @GBRBiLL remarked that the vehicle is pretty nice, while @pskafte found the paint color awesome, praising the perfect motor and transmission combination. @kinglaw expressed that Honduras Maroon is one of the best colors from this era, sharing that it was somewhat replicated in a 1989 Pontiac Firebird. @Loualbert described the car as beautiful, and @JohnGrobe noted that it's a vehicle any UT fan should want. Additionally, @ACN968 sent wishes that the next owner will enjoy driving it safely for many miles, adding to the positive reception of the car.
Neutral: Comments regarding the car's color led to various assessments of its authenticity. @Mgilley (The Seller) confirmed the car was restored in Honduras Maroon. However, @62cruiser disagreed, stating that the color is far off the original Africa Maroon, suggesting it has more tangerine tones instead. @Rbeemer pointed out the discrepancy between the seller's description and another source's description of the color while acknowledging the outstanding finish. @motorheaddude inquired about the inclusivity of specific accessories like the jack and wiper motor, reflecting the typical buyer's concerns without emotional weight.
Negative: On the negative side, @62cruiser and @Belair1900 explicitly contested the color claims, with @62cruiser asserting that the paint misrepresents the true Honduras Maroon shade. @motorheaddude expressed frustration over the lack of information regarding essential equipment, indicating dissatisfaction with the seller's transparency. Overall, while multiple commenters appreciated the aesthetics of the vehicle, concerns arose regarding its color authenticity, and some were left unsatisfied with unanswered questions about included parts.
|
 |
Positive: Commenter @AutoDreamRides expressed their admiration for the vehicle, indicating a perceived missed opportunity for Volkswagen to continue producing an electric version alongside a performance variant. @Classic472 shared a positive experience, mentioning reliability and ease of use from their daughter's previous model, highlighting a functional and practical aspect of the car. The seller @greenerdays11 emphasized that the car has a clean, accident-free CARFAX and mentioned the limited production numbers, proposing it as a collectible that enhances its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: Both the seller @greenerdays11 and commenters noted the vehicle’s compliance with California emissions standards, reinforcing its practicality for those in the state. The seller provided detailed insights into the car's features, such as the unique two-tone paint and sport-tuned suspension, while also offering assistance with shipping for potential bidders, indicating a customer-oriented approach.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle itself, but @Classic472's nostalgia for a simpler model indicates a perspective on how automotive preferences have changed over time. This subtle indication reflects a sentiment that, while the car may be excellent, the evolution to more complex vehicles like BMWs might lead potential buyers to question the simplicity and functionality of models like the Final Edition Beetle.
|
 |
Positive: @SirMercsALot views the M113K motors positively, comparing them favorably to diesel engines and noting that 84k miles indicates the vehicle is just getting started. @georgepehanick describes it as the greatest full-size luxury performance sedan made in 2006, highlighting its impressive status. Additionally, @CICBarkeep shares satisfaction from their own similar vehicle, stating it performs almost as new even after substantial mileage, emphasizing the joy it brings their ownership. @bruisedorange57, the seller, mentions how driving the car always brings a smile, reinforcing the joy and nostalgia associated with the vehicle.
Neutral: Several inquiries about the vehicle's features and history indicate a general interest in its specifics. @adam_bishop asks about the original radio and phone equipment, expressing curiosity over its 'Old School' nature along with comments from @Vahe1990 regarding the exhaust sound and number of keys. The seller responds, clarifying modifications and equipment present in the vehicle, including three keys and an updated radio. Other comments raised concerns about potential alignment issues with the trunk, to which @bruisedorange57 acknowledges their lack of knowledge regarding adjustments, while sharing the car's condition and historical sales information.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's air suspension and maintenance appear in the comments from @phili4646 and @Porambo. @phili4646 mentions unresolved suspension issues, prompting a detailed response from the seller about the adjustable system and its minor leak, which they chose not to repair because it doesn't affect performance. @Porambo questions the valve cover gaskets, insisting they should be replaced due to their age. The seller's explanation implies reluctance to address these maintenance issues, leading to suspicions about the economic viability of future repairs, leaving some potential buyers uncertain about the car's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's impressive state, with users praising its beautiful original paint and mechanical condition. @upstate58 noted the model as "very well-done," while @MelbaToastPackin expressed excitement over the color combination and drivetrain upgrades, indicating a strong interest in placing a bid. @McLovinIt provided an in-depth analysis of the upgrades and conditions, appreciating the DUI HEI conversion and Motorcraft 2100 carburetor as solid enhancements that contribute to the vehicle's reliability. Overall, the vehicle is characterized as a true turn-key 1981 CJ5 with rebuilt drivetrain components.
Neutral: A few comments reflect some curiosity and requests for additional information, such as video footage of the cold start and driving, which @Gregc123 and @Justanotherdude expressed interest in. @DarrelM (The Seller) has been responsive to these inquiries, already acknowledging plans to upload more videos, such as the functioning of interior and exterior lights. @TheYonkk raised valid points about compliance requirements for California, indicating the need for more than just the TBI kit for emissions compliance, to which @DarrelM provided updates on available components like the evap canister and EGR valve.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle's original components. @Justanotherdude asked if it retains all original smog equipment, to which @DarrelM confirmed that it does not, needing a Howell EFI carb for compliance. @McLovinIt further pointed out discrepancies with the color coding of the seats, clarifying that while the seats are original to a Jeep, they are not original to this specific vehicle. Additionally, @TheYonkk's comment indicates uncertainty about whether all necessary emissions components are present, reflecting a broader concern among potential buyers about the vehicle's overall compliance with regulatory standards.
|
 |
Positive: The comments praise the vehicle's overall condition and performance, with @BUSSTUFJG (The Seller) highlighting the excellent state of the rims and the smooth driving experience at high speeds, indicating no vibrations and straight alignment. @boaboyoz describes the car as an 'absolutely fabulous Florida 992.1 4S coupe' and appreciates its stylish appearance, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. Additionally, feedback from local bidders has been positive, reinforcing the vehicle's desirability and quality.
Neutral: There are inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications and features, such as @dl502 asking about the window sticker and @mtneerz inquiring about the premium package details, specifically whether it includes 360 cameras. @BUSSTUFJG (The Seller) provides information about the window sticker and notes that the window tint and paint protection film were added by the original selling dealer. The seller also responds to @VALLEYSTEVE, inviting him to see the car in person and assuring that he sent the necessary contact information.
Negative: Overall, there are no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle itself. Most inquiries seem to relate to seeking additional information or clarifications rather than expressing dissatisfaction. However, the absence of certain features, like 360 cameras mentioned by @mtneerz, might imply limitations that some potential buyers could view unfavorably. Nonetheless, these comments do not appear to detract from the positive overall impression of the car.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 2001 GMC Yukon XL 2500, praising its exceptional condition and low mileage. @Joeshamrock emphasized its cleanliness, while @Calamari_Jujutsu noted its showroom quality. @Avusblue was impressed by features like the big-block engine and unique barn doors, categorizing the vehicle as a standout option that was tough to find in such good condition. @SuperKram highlighted the vehicle's desirable features, including the AutoRide option and its overall driving capability. Positive sentiments continued with @JackElite commending the color and @89lincolntc suggesting it could be someone's 'forever' truck.
Neutral: The seller, @Brothers4, provided extensive details about the vehicle, noting its well-preserved state and routine maintenance history. They mentioned the importance of transparency in presenting the truck's condition, citing a thorough service history. @DV2 inquired about the underbody condition, leading @Brothers4 to clarify that it was clean without the need for dry ice blasting. Throughout the comments, there was a mix of admiration and requests for additional information about the truck's features and specifications, illustrating a strong interest in the vehicle without overt negativity.
Negative: While there weren't outright negative comments, there were concerns from some users about the practicality of purchasing older models compared to newer generations. @DV2's question about underbody cleaning indicated a desire for reassurance regarding the vehicle's preservation. No comments explicitly criticized the Yukon, but some users questioned why someone would choose a vintage truck over newer models, implying that there might be some reservations about reliability and modern features.
|
 |
Positive: @IcemanBDub mentioned that the vehicle is a beautiful rig with plenty of mileage left, indicating strong maintenance. They expressed confidence that the buyer will be happy with this well-maintained example, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. Additionally, @PS919 described the vehicle as an absolute beauty, hinting at high appreciation for the car's condition and aesthetics.
Neutral: @CarbonM raised points regarding the car's prior use as an executive vehicle and suggested contacting Porsche NA for confirmation about its service designation. They also remarked on the healthy maintenance history and wished the seller well, indicating an overall positive yet cautious perspective about the vehicle's backstory. @mspohn shared their experience of viewing the car, confirming that while they decided on another model, they found the Cayenne appealing and noticed no smoke smell inside the vehicle, adding credibility to the seller's claims.
Negative: @DragonDale inquired about the status of the vehicle's dieselgate warranty, expressing concern over potential lingering issues from the scandal. The seller clarified that the warranty period had expired, creating a feeling of uncertainty around the vehicle's reliability moving forward. Additionally, @Alfaman67 questioned about potential damage to the dash and headliner, highlighting worries that could impact buyer confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @selectm mentions that the 2016 Range Rover Sport HSE Td6 diesel is a super nice vehicle with a strong and smooth driving performance. The 3.0L turbo diesel engine provides impressive torque, allowing for solid and stable handling. The vehicle has a comprehensive service history, highlighting regular maintenance such as oil changes, wheel alignments, and sensor replacements, ensuring the car is fully functional. It also boasts high-end features like a Meridian Sound System, climate comfort packages, and rare 22-inch wheels, emphasizing its luxurious setup.
Neutral: Commenter @Ecmesquire shares their past experience with the Range Rover Sport Td6, stating that they ordered one new in 2016, drove it for three years, and then traded it back in. This indicates a positive overall impression but lacks specific details about the vehicle’s performance or features during their ownership, making it a neutral observation. Additionally, @selectm confirmed that the vehicle does not come with a hitch when questioned by @8000rpm, which speaks to the vehicle's specifications rather than a subjective evaluation.
Negative: No negative comments were found regarding the vehicle, as all responses were either positive about the car's performance and features or neutral in nature, focusing solely on inquiries about specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @ILoveV8Sedans found the stretched B7 Passat to be an entertaining sight, expressing amusement with a light-hearted comment about its uniqueness. @Dollycat3 echoed this sentiment by describing it as a wonderful unique Passat, while @MichaelKirschmann praised its fuel efficiency, indicating a great experience with his own Passat and expressing a willingness to bid just to annoy his neighbors. @BrakeStop (The Seller) emphasized that the vehicle is a unique head-turner that delivers both comfort and impressive mileage, further enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @SimplyAnEnthusiast99 mentioned having seen the vehicle parked consistently for years, pointing out its presence without strong emotion. Multiple commenters, including @Bodetsr and @Greggiekay, inquired about specific details regarding the car's dimensions and who performed the stretch, focusing more on factual information. @vanye777 requested various details about the vehicle’s audio system and engine specifications, showing a curiosity without clear bias.
Negative: @BMWE90Guy and @HeadMaster1 questioned the motivation behind modifying such a vehicle, expressing confusion and ambivalence. @Just_Ed remarked that just because something is possible does not mean it should be done, offering a critical perspective on the modification. Additionally, @craZee humorously suggested that the vehicle's creation might have been an odd request to a fabricator, hinting at the absurdity of altering a Passat in such a manner.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong appreciation for the car's design and the overall allure of the 1960 Imperial convertible. @CMC300M finds it a 'sexy machine,' indicating a deep admiration for its aesthetic appeal. Commenters like @CadillacBob1968 and @buellwinkle echo this sentiment, praising the Chrysler styling of the era as remarkably attractive and expressing surprise at its rarity. Many users share nostalgic feelings about the car, with @SnookMemphis enthusiastically declaring it their dream car, while @Bill1648 reminisces about its history and uniqueness. There is also factual appreciation regarding its mechanical aspects, as several users affirm the excellent condition of the vehicle, with @HyannisHonda (The Seller) and @Dazie providing reassurances about its maintenance and performance.
Neutral: Several users raise pertinent questions that point to the desire for further information about the vehicle. @MNImperial1960 is curious about the operation speed of the convertible's top and windows, while @TheADM requests additional photos of the dash lights in low light conditions. @Pennoak expresses interest in the condition of the top, requesting clarification on any minor wear, while @eaglespit shares their aspirations of owning a drop top. The seller, @HyannisHonda, addresses various inquiries about features and adjustments, indicating a prompt engagement with potential buyers. Across comments, users maintain a balance of excitement and inquiry that reflects interest from multiple perspectives.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the vehicle, particularly about its cosmetic and technical condition. @Dmiles1259 suggests that the underside photos are too dark and requests clearer images to assess the corrosion described in the listing, while @Pennoak comments on visible cuts and scratches on the top, questioning its overall condition despite the seller's assurances. The reliability of the temperature gauge is also a point of contention, with @Padre4art inquiring about it being 'pegged on hot' during a video. @Dazie responds to this by suggesting the gauge may simply be malfunctioning. Furthermore, @Pennoak expresses disappointment in the restoration timeline of the car after its previous ownership, which raises questions about the consistency of its maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors express enthusiasm and admiration for the NSX model, highlighting its desirability and performance. @Oldhockyplayr reminisces about their fond experience with driving a similar vehicle, emphasizing the NSX's excellent handling and relatively low maintenance costs. @SammySammy also notes the NSX's enduring appeal in the auction market, recalling a past sale price which adds intrigue to the current auction. Additionally, @bmansi and @Luv2Travel affirm the value and enjoyment of the automatic transmission version, noting its smooth ride and ease of driving in traffic, encouraging other enthusiasts to appreciate both manual and automatic variants.
Neutral: The seller, @whh333, provides detailed information about the vehicle including its history, maintenance records, and current condition. They clarify that the car's mileage is listed as True Mileage Unknown (TMU) due to a replaced odometer, but present a transparent timeline to reassure potential buyers. The seller also addresses maintenance aspects, such as the timing belt replacement, and mentions the inclusion of spare parts and wheels, which adds to the depth of information provided about the vehicle and its auction status. Overall, this transparency helps potential bidders to make informed decisions while potentially increasing their confidence in the listing.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism or concern regarding the vehicle's condition and specific details. @ZR1ZR1ZR1 notes the absence of a manual transmission, which is often preferred by enthusiasts, potentially limiting the car's appeal to some bidders. Furthermore, @DragonPLP raises a question about whether the car was affected by flooding, referencing a Carfax alert; @whh333 responds to clarify that there are no signs of flood damage. Finally, @Allsteel1 inquires about auction reserves, implying potential uncertainty about the bidding process. Such comments highlight concerns that might deter buyers looking for more assurance regarding the vehicle's history and condition.
|
28k-Mile 2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition
1G1YY12S845122204
Lot 238236
Private Party
 |
Positive: @johnjm highlights the unique aspects of the vehicle, noting its history related to the C5R and the innovative use of carbon fiber which contributed to reduced curb weight. @danb2520 appreciates the suggestion for the Service Parts Identification Label photo as it will aid potential bidders. Additionally, @danb2520 confirms that all functions of the vehicle work as expected, indicating a reliable vehicle overall.
Neutral: @Bakker16 asks about the peculiar bidding activity of @Volvo8492, prompting a discussion about legitimacy. @RafaelCB inquires about the availability of a driving video and the vehicle's functionality, while @vegassam offers a duplicate window sticker from their dealership, suggesting a cooperative exchange of information between parties. The communication between bidders and the seller reflects an active and engaged auction atmosphere.
Negative: @HotVette points out a discrepancy in the listing regarding the engine size, suggesting it should be corrected for accuracy. @johnjm mentions the driver's seat showing significant wear compared to their own vehicle with more mileage, indicating potential wear and tear concerns. @bayboat raises multiple questions about the vehicle's condition, including the status of the harmonic balancer, AC performance, and tire age, which suggests some apprehensions regarding the vehicle's maintenance and readiness.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a generally positive sentiment towards the vehicle being sold. @ron67 (The Seller) has highlighted that the Ram truck is in excellent condition both inside and out, described as 'turn-key and ready to go', and has passed California Smog. Commenters like @Traveler66 express admiration for the truck's appearance, noting its sharp, clean look, and complimenting the vehicle's mileage and performance. @ron67 provides helpful and informative responses regarding the truck's features, such as the door tag photo and details about the suspension system, showcasing a commitment to transparency and customer service.
Neutral: Several comments center around inquiries and additional information regarding the truck, with a focus on mechanical specifics rather than emotional responses. @Patrick2358 requests a cold start video, while @gord6 asks about expected fuel mileage, both of which @ron67 responds to with relevant information. @KenHurder seeks clarification on the air system and the size of the slide-in, showing interest but not expressing any specific sentiment toward the vehicle itself. The requests and clarifications suggest that potential buyers are gathering key details to make an informed decision.
Negative: There are few negative comments explicitly stated, largely focusing on features that some users would prefer or modifications they wish were present. @Traveler66 expresses a desire for a V10 engine, indicating a potential shortfall in power options for some buyers. Additionally, @Dgutz646 inquires about the oil change history, raising concerns over maintenance documentation. However, @ron67 reassures commenters by detailing recent maintenance sessions, including an oil change and fluid servicing, which may help alleviate any buyer hesitations.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive remarks for its overall care and aesthetic appeal. @AlpineJay described it as 'lovely, simply lovely,' highlighting its well-maintained condition and family history as a significant factor in its charm. @vansters also expressed a sentimental connection to the car and remarked on its attractive body and fit, implying that it holds emotional value for the seller. Moreover, @Way2fast contributed to the positive sentiment by sharing that the vehicle was recently serviced and performed well on the road, indicating it can still provide a pleasant driving experience.
Neutral: Several commenters voiced neutral yet practical considerations regarding the vehicle's condition and the potential necessity for maintenance. @500drvr and @LB-BOB inquired about the presence of corrosion and the overall state of the chassis while noting that the car might require significant repairs due to its lack of use in recent years. @Justain brought attention to the age of the tires and gauges that needed clarification, reflecting a desire for more comprehensive details without passing immediate judgment on the vehicle's performance.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised by a few individuals. @LB-BOB expressed skepticism regarding the car's ability to drive properly, linking its low mileage and age to possible deterioration of crucial components. @500drvr and @boom132 highlighted what they perceived as shoddy bodywork based on visual evidence, indicating that body filler may have been used excessively. Furthermore, @Berend15 and @Justain echoed doubts about the seller's responsiveness and the degree of transparency in communicating the car's history, voicing that the lack of operational videos and responses could undermine potential buyers' trust in the auction.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its excellent condition and appealing aesthetics. @Gvillepa noted that although they wished for a 5-speed manual transmission, they believed the vehicle would make someone very happy. @Gltws,Kars4Kenn called the Jeep great looking and expressed curiosity about its garage storage. @MrJeep997, a seasoned Jeep owner, also approved of the Jeep, confirming its quality with checks for the frame and engine. The compliments continued with @MapleSyrupCoffee, who admired the clean undercarriage and the light modifications that enhance the vehicle's usability without detracting from its classic appeal. Other users like @crossjeep34 and @M3_fanatics echoed similar sentiments, noting the vehicle's rust-free status and overall cleanliness, underscoring its desirability.
Neutral: Some comments sought more detailed information about the vehicle's performance and modifications. @JawKnee3012 inquired about the California emissions sticker, reflecting a common concern among viewers regarding environmental regulations. Meanwhile, @Meyer78 asked if there were any cold start or test drive videos available, indicating a need for assurance regarding the vehicle's functionality. @Degsss noted the mismatched spare tire and sought clarification, to which the seller, @Aardvark27, responded promptly, stating that the spare is the same as the others but they hadn’t sourced a matching Moab wheel yet, which demonstrated transparency in communication. @Dp454so's question about the air conditioning's effectiveness further illustrated potential buyers’ practical considerations, especially in warmer climates.
Negative: Though there was mostly positive feedback, a couple of comments indicated some concerns or frustrations. @19Willys46 expressed annoyance about the frequent questions regarding California smog laws, suggesting that such inquiries can hinder interest in classic cars within that state. They emphasized that if potential buyers were serious, they should consider seeking vehicles outside California due to stringent regulations. Additionally, @LALC mentioned that the soft top appeared to be missing corner supports, which they believed would improve its fit. These comments reflected minor drawbacks perceived by potential buyers, contributing to a slightly critical aspect of the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect a recognition of the vehicle's potential despite its current condition. @Bill_GMC notes that while there is considerable rust, the truck is not beyond restoration, asserting it could be brought back to its former glory. @mustang1965 refers to it as a 'diamond in the very rough,' implying that with effort, it can shine. Furthermore, @stathios (The Seller) encourages interested parties to schedule in-person inspections, reinforcing confidence in the truck's appeal. The acknowledgement of the vehicle's 4-speed manual with a low gear offers additional insight into its functionality, as noted by @jwolfgangk and clarified by @stathios.
Neutral: Several comments touch on the technical aspects of the vehicle. @stathios (The Seller) elaborates on the truck's gearing system, clarifying that it has four forward gears, including a 'granny gear' which has caused some confusion amongst potential buyers. @Assam humorously adds that if one does not start in low gear, it might operate more like a 3-speed. Others, like @RoscoeP, request further details such as pictures of the cab supports and floors from underneath, indicating a general interest in knowing more about the truck's structural integrity.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are evident in the comments. @jamestra mentions a noise during driving that sounds like a loud squeak, which might suggest mechanical issues, and @mustang1965 highlights the need for replacement parts including doors and fenders, indicating that significant work is required before the truck can be roadworthy. These negative observations suggest potential buyers must be prepared for the necessary repairs to make the vehicle functional again.
|
 |
Positive: @lloyddon1 (The Seller) expresses confidence in the auction process, highlighting their successful track record with over 200 transactions and a reputation for transparency. The 2021 Porsche Cayenne Turbo is depicted as a high-performance SUV, well-maintained and optioned with luxury features like a premium package, adaptive cruise control, and enhanced climate controls. The seller emphasizes the vehicle's stunning condition and mechanical integrity, portraying it as an exceptional opportunity for buyers interested in a high-end performance vehicle at a significant discount.
Neutral: Several potential buyers have engaged with the seller, asking questions about specifics like the OEM wheels and the vehicle's service history. @christopherlum1 inquires about the wheels and brakes, while @peeedubdee seeks clarification on the original wheels' status. The seller responds transparently, providing details about the warehouse's minor visual imperfections and listing recent service updates, including the successful retrofitting and performance enhancements made to the vehicle. Acknowledgment of minor criticisms concerning additional modifications reflects an openness to inquiries.
Negative: A few commentators like @Winefan94941 and @lex2569 express concerns about potential downsides to the vehicle's modifications, questioning how the performance upgrades may affect resale value and warranty eligibility. The discussions also explore possible legal ramifications regarding emissions compliance in states like California, adding to the uncertainty for some potential bidders. @idnisevich and @uconnskip highlight issues regarding wear and certain electronic performance controls, which may necessitate additional reassurance from the seller about the car's reliability and maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the 1968 Mustang convertible, highlighting its beautiful color and lovely interior. @Dollycat3 notes that it is an 'absolutely wonderful' car with a great provenance and documentation. @funkaholik appreciates the uniqueness of the color combo, specifically mentioning that it suits the convertible perfectly and noting minimal rust for an East Coast car. @stathios (The Seller) emphasizes that this Mustang is a great opportunity for someone to enjoy as is or refurbish, inviting interested buyers to inspect it in person.
Neutral: @V1rotateV2 is curious about the production date of the vehicle, which could be found on the assembly line, and @ChasinFords provides insight into the scheduled build date being May 16. @CarFoolLane mentions significant repairs made to the vehicle, specifically a carburetor rebuild costing over $1,600 and discusses the nuances of the wheel covers, suggesting a certain type was standard for the model. @stathios (The Seller) acknowledges the interest in the vehicle and assures prospective buyers of available storage and shipping assistance post-sale.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns about the condition and presentation of the vehicle. @EddieNap expresses disappointment at the lack of clear, unobstructed photos of critical areas like the torque boxes, suggesting that previous vehicles owned had suffered due to winter driving in similar regions. @XLR8TG laments the change from the car's original colors, while @CarFoolLane critiques the high costs associated with maintaining older vehicles, indicating that while valuable, the expenses can be steep.
|
 |
Positive: @hildog (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a well-cared-for 1997-1999 Boxster that has been maintained by a local Porsche specialist and has hardly seen rain, emphasizing its potential for providing joy to the next owner. They highlight key features such as a fully functional top in excellent condition, a well-preserved interior, and the inclusion of two keys and a manual, presenting the car as a fantastic value for its price. @hildog also encourages prospective buyers, pointing out the handling and appearance of the vehicle, making it appealing to collectors and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Mullooly and @pod0131, request additional documentation and information regarding the manufacturer's info sticker and service history. @USMCSGT asks about the IMS bearing verification, noting the conflicting data on this issue, reflecting the need for transparency and assurance. @Daun's inquiries about the tires and requests for videos showcase a keen interest in ensuring the vehicle's condition is scrutinized before purchase, indicating the typical buyer's concerns about pre-owned vehicles.
Negative: Concerns about the IMS bearing are prevalent, with commenters such as @USMCSGT expressing uncertainty over its status and seeking clarity due to varying information in research. @Daun's comments about the 'older' tires indicate skepticism regarding the car's overall condition, suggesting that some potential buyers may feel hesitant about the vehicle's maintenance. Additionally, @hildog admits a lack of service documentation beyond the Carfax report, which could deter some interested buyers looking for more comprehensive maintenance records.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praises the killer build of the Cali Cadillac Coupe DeVille, expressing that it's a very cool car. @Craven finds it very tastefully done, and @OutOfMyElement, despite usually not liking modern wheels on '60s cars, believes that the clean design and black paint really bring the vehicle together. @SJFodor admires the stunning interior and considers it gangsta yet tasteful. Additionally, @MikeFiftyNine appreciates the build, inquiring about specific features like the window switch bezel, and @JohnF1966 notes that old Cadillacs really shine when customized and lowered, highlighting the great colors and interior work.
Neutral: Many comments involve technical inquiries about the car's features and specifications. @BrucePhilly asks whether the AC is factory or aftermarket, and @Vlombardi inquires about the type of suspension used and requests photos. @1Chry56 requests better undercarriage photos and seeks clarification about the air lines. @Brav, the seller, actively responds to these inquiries, providing information about the aftermarket A/C, the air management system, and the types of air lines used. They also reassure potential buyers of the options available, mentioning that wire wheels are included in the sale.
Negative: Some comments express hesitation regarding the 22-inch wheels, with @39mercman stating that while the car is impressive, they are not completely sold on the new wheels and prefer the original wire wheels. @TheCritic humorously suggests that the interior might hide something dangerous, while @1Chry56 raises concerns about potential clearance issues between the driveline and the crossmember, indicating that there could be problems at high speeds. Overall, while the car receives much praise, there are valid concerns from some commenters regarding specific modifications and potential issues.
|
 |
Positive: @Mmoldovan (The Seller) showed a willingness to engage with potential buyers by agreeing to provide a cold start video, addressing @Reefman's request promptly. This demonstrates responsiveness and a desire to assist interested parties in making informed decisions about the vehicle. Additionally, @Mmoldovan's assurance that the vehicle is likely emissions compliant in California as of 2005 provides some confidence to buyers concerned about environmental regulations.
Neutral: Several comments indicate a need for further information regarding the vehicle, such as @Reefman's request for a cold start video and @mgm86's inquiry about emissions compliance. @Cade702 suggests contacting Yamaha with the VIN, indicating that while buyers are interested, they require additional verification and details before making a decision. @Mmoldovan’s responses provide some clarity but also highlight the absence of certain documents or stickers that buyers might expect to see.
Negative: A few concerns were raised by potential buyers, particularly regarding the original exhaust not being included with the vehicle, as noted by @Mmoldovan (The Seller). This could deter those looking for a complete package. Additionally, @mgm86 mentioned that there should be a compliance sticker under the seat, which @Mmoldovan could not confirm without potentially taking parts off, hinting at a lack of transparency regarding the vehicle's full compliance status. Such uncertainties might make some buyers hesitant to proceed with their interest.
|
|
|