Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: @LeWayneF finds the car cool, while @Damm20 expresses love for it. @billyblyth describes it as a handsome example that meets his expectations, and @MyTopLeaks commends the modifications as stunning and well-executed. Many comments highlight the car's clear appeal; for instance, @MCHEZ1957 attests to its stunning looks and sound, and @GorgeousTobyFlamethrower shows interest in the aesthetics of the car, asking whether the white dot on the side is a decal. The seller, @car_clubhouse, provides affirmations about the car's reliability and strong performance, making it an ideal choice for various rallies and events. Overall, commenters appreciate the car's beauty and functionality alike.
Neutral: Several comments discuss details about the car's specifications and racing history. @Silvaire recalls a car from his youth built in San Diego, expressing satisfaction that it has survived. @BobSoCal questions the legality of the vehicle in California, and @cymadesign seeks engine compartment pictures and additional build information. The seller explains the car's legal status and provides information about the engine size and modifications. @GMando requests a video of the car in action, indicating curiosity about its performance without expressing a definitive opinion about its quality. Comments from various users reflect a blend of admiration and a desire for additional technical details.
Negative: @JettJolene reflects on not having the mechanical skills necessary to maintain a similar car in the past, suggesting challenges associated with owning vintage vehicles. This point is echoed by @richthom and @Mgrescueguy, who show concerns regarding specific components, such as whether the car's engine has been sufficiently upgraded and about the missing tachometer. @sludgo's dismissive remark about the auction signifies a lack of enthusiasm for the process itself. Overall, while the general sentiment is positive, there are some skeptics who question certain aspects of the car's history and specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the Ducati motorcycle being sold, with @grandprix231, the seller, highlighting that it has been well maintained and is ready to ride. Many users, including @TheObsidianCollection and @johnmccoyitaly, commend the bike’s nimbleness and comfort for longer distances, making it a great sport touring motorcycle. @JPSO86 adds that his experience with the 2003 model has been highly positive, noting impressive speeds and handling, suggesting that this bike can provide an exciting riding experience for potential buyers.
Neutral: Inquiries about specific details of the motorcycle are present among the comments, such as @racerbri32’s question about the wheels, and @FastDucSter’s request for information regarding the fairings. @asgor is interested in service records, which @grandprix231 promises to provide. Overall, these neutral inquiries indicate a serious interest from prospective buyers who are looking for thorough information before making a purchase decision.
Negative: Some comments reflect a lack of focus on the vehicle itself, such as @PMerkle’s humorous remark comparing it to a Chevy Corsica, which could detract from the perception of the Ducati. Additionally, concerns about missing components like the license plate bulb and cover were raised by @49miledriver, indicating a potential oversight on the seller's part. These comments suggest that while the bike has many positive aspects, there are also areas that could use improvement or clarification.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle as a beautiful example of a survivor, with @MontanaBroncos expressing love for its appearance and @standard38 calling it deserving of being a daily driver. @lbpa18 also shares optimism, noting that once the tailgate and spare tire rack are replaced, it would be a perfect example of how they were originally intended. The seller, @Jim_Darcy, emphasizes the Bronco's original components and low mileage, ensuring potential buyers of its authenticity and quality. Overall, the positive sentiment focuses on its aesthetic appeal and original condition.
Neutral: Many comments sought clarification regarding the vehicle's history and condition. @cascade_classics asked whether the Bronco had been repaired or repainted, to which @Jim_Darcy confirmed a previous exterior repaint and minor damage to the tailgate from a prior incident. @Peachyracer raised a similar query about the vehicle being deemed 'unrestored' despite the repaint, prompting a detailed response from the seller clarifying that while the exterior paint is not original, many components remain unchanged. This exchange showcases an interest in the Bronco's authenticity and a desire for transparency around its history.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and terminology. @Peachyracer noted that while the vehicle is claimed to be an 'original survivor,' it had undergone painting, raising questions about its classification. Additionally, there is some skepticism about the vehicle's low usage over the years, with comments hinting at worries about the care it has received, considering it has only been driven about 200 miles in the last fifteen years. This skepticism indicates a cautious approach among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's long-term reliability and maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Micahs (The Seller) highlights that the turbo vehicle is in beautiful condition, notably described as 'Freshly Service' and 'As Close To New Condition As You're Ever Going To Find'. The seller emphasizes their trust in the high-end service center that maintained the vehicle, mentioning that it is up to date on all services and comes with service documentation, two keys, the original owner's manual, and the window sticker. @h_bakken and @Micahs express their appreciation for the car's performance and style, with @h_bakken notably stating that they consider it the 'Best car I have ever owned'. Overall, there's a recognition of the vehicle's excellence and aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made by @tagaku regarding the specifics of the vehicle's service history, particularly focusing on the PDK clutch fluid and the AWD controller oil service, noting that these services are significant for a vehicle of this age. @Micahs responded to these questions, indicating that all services were completed as per the recommendations of a reputable service center. @Glenn930 also asked for clarification on the differences between the turbo and turbo S models, engaging the seller and other commenting users in discussions about the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: While the seller @Micahs assures potential buyers of the vehicle's condition, there are underlying concerns regarding service specifics raised by @tagaku. They pointed out that certain recommended services, such as the PDK clutch fluid and AWD controller fluid, were not explicitly mentioned in the provided invoices, which could indicate some omissions. This uncertainty could lead potential buyers to question the thoroughness of the vehicle's maintenance history, despite the seller's confidence in the service records.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @FordGuy01 kicked off the discussion with positive vibes and support for the seller and future buyer, expressing confidence in the 2015 GT350's greatness. @tp808 praised the car as beautiful and suggested it is suitable for everyday use, while @Fineride provided statistics and market insights, noting the strong interest and healthy bids for this 2020 GT350. @WLACA echoed a common theme of joy in driving these cars, emphasizing the fun and engaging nature of the GT350 compared to other exotic cars. Overall, many commenters highlight the joy of owning and driving this model, with some even sharing their personal experiences with previous versions.
Neutral: Comments such as those from @misterD64 and @NVGT350 focused on technical aspects, discussing tire setups and preferences without leaning too much into positive or negative sentiment. @Jim_Nayzium simply stated the car is sold, which adds to the neutral tone of the auction updates. Questions from @redbird-67 addressing specifics about the wheels and the owner's kit were also neutrally informative, reflecting a genuine interest in the details rather than expressing emotional sentiment.
Negative: The discussions weren't devoid of concerns; @badboat25 pointed out the lack of a supercharger, indicating disappointment in that feature. @gtabert expressed skepticism about the practicality of driving such performance vehicles in winter with the chosen tire setup, indicating a concern for functionality versus aesthetics. @GO-PAC-GO criticized the appearance of the tires, calling them 'fugly,' which adds a negative viewpoint to the discussion surrounding this GT350. Additionally, @Maverickr68 raised concerns over potential coolant issues, reflecting caution and skepticism on maintenance aspects.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a well-maintained 1994 or 1995 LR Defender 110 TDI, presenting well overall despite some signs of age. The seller, @AuthenticAuctions, notes that the truck has received a full repaint on the driver's side to address previous paint issues, enhancing its appearance. Additionally, the undercarriage has been power-washed and serviced, with attention given to the rear differential, further showcasing the care taken with this vehicle.
Neutral: Some commenters have engaged in discussion about the vehicle's details, with @WAGONBOYTD confirming it is indeed a 1995 model, while @GBRBiLL raises questions about the rear axle's limited slip differential. The seller aims to verify the axle's specifications and clarify any confusion regarding it. There is also mention of the vehicle's history as a SORN (Statutory Off Road Notification) in the UK, contributing to a conversation about its overall condition for a UK model.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding some aspects of the vehicle's condition. @GBRBiLL points out signs of crusting around the brakes and suspension due to its previous estate or farm use. Additionally, @bbomber inquires about potential perforations in the door bottoms, highlighting a common issue with older vehicles. The seller acknowledges these issues while emphasizing that they are not indicative of significant rot, inviting further inspection and inquiries.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received high praise for its pristine condition and stunning appearance, with @twilightdude (The Seller) mentioning that it is a gem with just over 11,500 miles. Many commenters appreciate the detailed photo documentation provided, including the work on the odometer and the maintenance that has been performed. Users like @Jacolorado remarked positively on the 237 photos, showing that the seller is making an effort to give potential buyers a comprehensive view of the vehicle.
Neutral: Some commenters raised questions about specific vehicle details without expressing strong opinions either way. @TheGuesser pointed out that most photos are from a previous listing, suggesting the need for updated images or labeling, which could enhance transparency. Additionally, inquiries about the lift kit height from @mrmiller1122 and requests for exterior dimensions for shipping from @JustDan13 suggest a practical interest that doesn't reflect a decisive negative or positive sentiment.
Negative: Concerns were expressed over the absence of certain key photos that could clarify features like axle lockers and sway bar disconnects, as highlighted by @Jacolorado. There were also inquiries about the vehicle's highway stability, with @MikeNoLomotel specifically asking about potential issues like 'death wobble.' Some comments appeared to humorously challenge the seller’s claim of no off-road use, suggesting possible evidence contrary to that claim, which indicates some skepticism among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the appeal and attractive aesthetics of the vehicle, with @Jtmotorcars expressing hope that new owners will enjoy the car as much as his family has. @wakerdasha praises the styling of the pre-facelift model compared to the rounded post-facelift designs. Commenters like @Aaron and @HeavyTank77 reminisce about their own experiences with the model, appreciating its timeless looks and performance attributes. Additionally, @Jtmotorcars reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's condition, noting there are zero cracks or delamination on the body, showcasing pride in the car's maintenance.
Neutral: Various questions were raised regarding specific features and the car's history, including inquiries about service records (@Stefspain), paintwork (@pierrevandalen), and interior condition (@quickmath). @Jtmotorcars responded consistently, stating that there is no evidence of any repainting and discussing prior maintenance performed by his family. A comment from @Aventador117 inquired about the ADS system's performance, indicating common concerns that prospective buyers may have regarding older car models.
Negative: Some negative sentiments arose from concerns about the car’s authenticity, with @pierrevandalen and others suspecting repainting. @ShelbyLVR mentioned significant expenses related to maintenance in their past ownership of the same model, indicating a potential buyer risk. Additionally, @nitsujiohc brought up worries about rust and wiring issues, which are common in older vehicles, particularly those in harsher climates. @Jtmotorcars attempted to address these concerns, reiterating the vehicle's good condition and reassuring interested parties about the vehicle's maintenance history and structural integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @VWKen finds the listing appealing, suggesting that it could be a good deal despite the rust. They express a love for buses and wish they could bid on it. @J.P._Dashpot mentions the van comes with a new battery, which is a positive feature. @Seanrowles (The Seller) asserts that the rust has been repaired, addressing concerns raised by other commenters and indicating that the bus has some original components, like the table.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Fargie and @vw81jetta, request more information and pictures, particularly about rust and original interior components. @Hywyflyr engages in a discussion about the Westfalia interiors, adding knowledgeable insights. @nsxomar5268 believes that more photos and videos would increase the bidding amount, hinting at a neutral stance toward the current listing.
Negative: Commenters like @Fargie express frustration over the vagueness of the listing, announcing that it may be the most imprecise they've seen on the platform. @vwthingbug raises concerns about the failed inspection due to rust repairs, indicating apprehension regarding the vehicle's condition. Multiple requests focus on the lack of detailed images of problem areas, with @Fargie and others highlighting the need for clarity about the vehicle's overall state and asking for specific photos that the seller has not provided.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rumbling appreciates the vehicle's easy access to the oil filter, while @VantageAuto (The Seller) touts its remarkable comfort and reliability, emphasizing that it has been well-maintained with a recently replaced battery. @BMWE90Guy regards the model as one of the best first cars ever, echoing sentiments of simplicity and reliability expressed by @Einsteinbella, who finds the car a cute package despite some questions about its dashboard design.
Neutral: @CarFoolLane notes that this car marks Honda's entry into the hybrid market, paralleling Toyota's movements, and reminisces about the unique 5-speed manual option available at the time. @VantageAuto (The Seller) clarifies misconceptions surrounding the Carfax report, indicating multiple registrations across states are common for cars in Florida. @random_giraffe highlights the unique design of the 2003 model's front facia and mentions minor imperfections consistent with its age while pointing out that these cars can easily last up to 200,000 miles if cared for.
Negative: @Boobby1969 raises concerns about the hybrid battery's replacement legitimacy, asking whether it was new or refurbished, as well as the implications of having had eight owners and only 29,000 miles. @random_giraffe criticizes certain wear and tear aspects, including signs of oil leakage, wear on the steering wheel, and a failing headliner, which may deter potential buyers. Additionally, @VantageAuto (The Seller) warns that while the vehicle is budget-friendly, potential buyers should consider future maintenance regarding the IMA battery and circuit board.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ApexAutoVault highlights the FJ Cruiser as a well-maintained vehicle with a very clean undercarriage. They emphasize that the truck runs and drives excellently, mentioning the recent replacement of the power steering pump, and describing the engine as healthy with a smooth-shifting transmission. The seller invites potential buyers to reach out for further discussions or shipping inquiries, showcasing their enthusiasm and confidence in the vehicle.
Neutral: In their description, @ApexAutoVault provides additional credibility for the FJ Cruiser by including a cold start video, demonstrating that all electronics are functioning correctly. They also share a test drive video, where the seller takes both hands off the wheel to illustrate the vehicle's stable handling and smooth driving experience. This content serves to reassure potential buyers about the truck's overall condition but does not provide user perspectives from other buyers.
Negative: There are no negative comments or concerns expressed regarding the FJ Cruiser in the provided comments. @ApexAutoVault maintains a positive tone throughout the discussions, with no mention of any potential issues or drawbacks related to the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rickaz expresses admiration for the vehicle, calling it a "beautiful work of art" and wishing the seller good luck with the auction (GLWTA). @RC51Tommy also shares positive feedback, mentioning that it's a great looking chopper and noting the exceptional quality of the paint job. Both comments reflect an appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and craftsmanship, suggesting it stands out in the market.
Neutral: @Cycle_Shack (The Seller) addresses questions regarding the sale process, clarifying that the motorcycle will be sold with necessary documentation including a Certificate of Origin, Bill of Sale, and Odometer statement. They explain the process for obtaining title and registration in response to inquiries about potential bank liens. This information aims to reassure potential buyers about the legitimacy of the sale.
Negative: @CapnRichie raises a concern about potential bank liens against the dealership, which suggests some uncertainty regarding the vehicle's legal standing. Additionally, @SRRum questions the shipping options mentioned, specifically commenting on the high cost of bringing a trailer, indicating potential frustration with additional fees associated with the purchase. These concerns may lead prospective buyers to hesitate.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments express excitement about the vehicle, indicating it is a desirable example for sale. @lovetodriveoldcars (The Seller) highlights the personal touch they offer to potential buyers by inviting them for in-person viewings or FaceTime calls, which shows commitment to customer service. @Eng7Capt also shows enthusiasm, stating they would be very interested if the vehicle had a different transmission. Additionally, @BeastRig refers to the vehicle as a 'Beast of a rig,' implying it has a strong and appealing presence.
Neutral: Several comments discuss technical aspects of the vehicle, including its transmission type. @bj74cruiserguy mentions that it has an Aisin transmission, which is considered an upgrade over the older Torqueflite, while @docwild discusses the pros and cons of the 68RFE transmission specifically. There are also inquiries about specific features such as the size of the box and the possibility of a delayed pickup for the vehicle, which shows practical consideration from interested parties.
Negative: Some comments reveal concerns or misunderstandings regarding the vehicle's specifics. @mh1962 questions whether the drag link has been upgraded, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's condition. @bj74cruiserguy accidentally references incorrect information regarding the transmission, showing confusion on his part. @docwild defends the 68RFE transmission by stating that it gets a bad rap, suggesting there might be a general lack of confidence in that model among other users.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnnyvett expressed admiration for the stunning restoration of the car, describing it as a beautiful 73 and wishing success for the auction. @Gmmuscleusa praised the vehicle's clean condition, noting it is well documented and free from issues typically associated with the Birdcage concerns. @Nittany97 also contributed with recognition of the well-presented offering, emphasizing the charm of the '73 model year and the top-condition engine, while showing interest in the auction.
Neutral: @Indianscout64 and @26Vettes highlighted that the tachometer is not functioning and questioned why the door panels were not replaced during restoration. @Noisyboyz sought clarification on whether the OEM Deluxe Turbine Wheel Covers were included with the purchase. Meanwhile, @Fuelieguy commented on the thoroughness of the seller, @TheBerthaCar, in presenting the vehicle and noted the detail-oriented approach to past auctions while also highlighting the car's appealing attributes.
Negative: @robertwichert inquired about missing compression test results, reflecting concerns over the engine's performance claims. @berend15 also questioned the status of the tach drive cable to ensure it remains intact, indicating potential worries regarding functionality. Overall, a few comments raised valid concerns over certain mechanical aspects of the vehicle that could influence bidding decisions.
![]() |
20k-Mile 2020 Airstream Interstate 24GL Tommy Bahama Relax Edition 4×4
WDAFF4CD0KT009736
Lot 238450
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praised the vehicle for its great interior, finishes, and bathroom, expressing a clear admiration for the Airstream Interstate. @Paul6200 shared their own experiences, noting the Airstream's superior reputation for quality compared to another RV they had chosen. They mentioned how enjoyable their travels across all 48 states have been and expressed optimism that the future owner would love the vehicle, highlighting its great condition. @Bevo13 (The Seller) also acknowledged the positive feedback from potential buyers, mentioning several features and accessories that come with the sale, which adds value to the vehicle.
Neutral: @26blackthorn inquired about the height of the vehicle, which @Bevo13 confirmed as 10’. @Ron1963 asked about the solar panels and their mounting, to which @Bevo13 responded that they are not aftermarket and produce good power but didn't have details on the brand. @simpley49 suggested that @Bevo13 check with a local Mercedes dealer for the original build sheet, indicating a common interest in documentation and specifications among potential buyers. @AVAbuser and @simpley49 asked questions regarding the number of seatbelts and the oil dipstick, illustrating a blend of general curiosity and specific concerns from interested parties.
Negative: @Tiger2319 asked about the reason for selling the Class B vehicle and if there were any mechanical or electrical issues, highlighting a concern that potential buyers often have. @simpley49 further commented on a prior concern regarding the oil dipstick, emphasizing the inconsistency of the electric indicator and referencing a prior experience with an older model. Although there were no significant complaints about the vehicle's condition, such inquiries suggest a general caution among potential buyers regarding reliability and any hidden deficiencies.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Troopy_LC (The Seller) emphasizes the vehicle's exciting auction start and notes the Land Cruiser's strong presence, rugged design, and character, appealing to enthusiasts. Comments from @Resafari and @GCCEXPORTS reflect admiration for the vehicle's clean condition and highway cruising capabilities, with @Resafari declaring it one of the cleanest Troopys seen.
Neutral: @JasonC. raises inquiries about the seat configuration and wheel condition, while @MoparMopar asks about various features like the rear bench seat's functionality and potential defects noted in a picture. @JayShack seeks clarification on specifications needed for transporting the vehicle to Europe, and @Pmothers requests measurements related to the roof rack, highlighting an interest in practical details.
Negative: @ITTIMEFORBED and @MoparMopar express concern about the RHD configuration, with @MoparMopar questioning potential defects in the vehicle. @MJB194 candidly critiques the notion of the vehicle cruising at high speeds, suggesting that such performance is unrealistic under normal conditions. This mixed reception reflects varying perspectives on practicality and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Temerian expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive performance with the phrase "Hart to Hart, baby!!!!" This comment suggests a strong appreciation for the car, likely indicating that the owner has had a positive experience and finds it enjoyable to drive. Such enthusiastic remarks typically resonate well in a community of vehicle enthusiasts who value performance and driving experience.
Neutral: No neutral comments were provided in the gathered feedback. The absence of neutral commentary suggests a strong leaning either towards positive or negative sentiments regarding the vehicle, with no mentions of mixed feelings or simple observations.
Negative: There were no negative comments included in the feedback. This could imply that any potential drawbacks or issues with the vehicle were either not voiced by the commenters or that the current feedback is overly optimistic, lacking critical perspectives.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mayaibuki expressed their admiration for the bike, stating that it is their wallpaper, indicating they find it visually appealing and likely to be of high aesthetic value. @jonathan1189, the seller, showcased the bike as an exceptionally clean 2001 Ducati 748, which he purchased in 2021. The seller mentioned it was stored in a climate-controlled room and had only been ridden for approximately 900 miles during his ownership, suggesting meticulous care and low usage, which could be attractive to potential buyers.
Neutral: @GMTA asked about the bike's history, inquiring whether it had been dropped or crashed, and requested service records to understand its maintenance better. The seller responded to the requests by indicating he would provide a cold start video, showing a commitment to transparency and willingness to engage with the potential buyers. @Undert0e also requested videos of the bike's cold start and ride, reflecting a desire for additional information to better assess the vehicle before making a decision.
Negative: No negative comments were noted in the provided comments. All interactions appeared to seek clarification or express admiration for the bike rather than criticism. Inquiries were mainly focused on gathering more information about the bike's condition and history, showing interest rather than dissatisfaction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the vehicle as a "charming Scout" and expressed enthusiasm for it, calling it an "orange and white delight," while also wishing good luck to the seller. @tlcamg echoed positive sentiments about seeing a "basically stock Scout," noting its appeal as a vehicle that can be kept as is or modified. @JWHBOOMER appreciated the honesty of the International Scout, acknowledging the restoration work done while emphasizing it is not overly modified, stating it looks clean for being 53 years old.
Neutral: @TexasKing (The Seller) addressed inquiries from commenters, confirming that the removable top's bolts are standard thread and explained the missing components like the headliner, clarifying that they are easily replaceable. @Baja1978 brought up several technical questions about the carburetor, fuel pump, and gas tank, to which @TexasKing provided thorough answers, explaining the vehicle's modifications and the use of an electric fuel pump. Overall, the exchange showed a willingness from the seller to clarify details about the car's condition and modifications, indicating a level of transparency.
Negative: @MDRMR277 raised a concern regarding the vehicle's speed, questioning if it can go faster than 15mph or if it was simply kept slow for the video. @camfen pinpointed some structural issues, mentioning missing bolts that attach the top to the quarter panels and other missing components, which could signify potential neglect. @PontiacNut recommended a longer driving video and emphasized the importance of conducting an in-person inspection, suggesting that potential issues could be a red flag for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tlcamg expresses a strong admiration for older Land Cruisers, particularly appreciating its features like the windshield vent and robust 6-cylinder engine, highlighting past experiences of successfully pulling larger vehicles with it. @Hoppy18 agrees, praising the vehicle as a gem suitable for navigating potholes in Montreal. @uuchemprof shares firsthand experience as a previous owner, stating the vehicle is mostly original but has tasteful upgrades that enhance its driving performance, suggesting it represents an excellent opportunity for buyers.
Neutral: @Chamba provides a thoughtful comment noting that the vehicle seems to be a NAS 40 with a non-original speedometer cluster, suggesting the need for clarity regarding its value. @Kericat (The Seller) confirms the NAS designation and explains that the instrument panel was changed to maintain functionality while preserving the original look. Questions arise from @dawg about the vehicle's original color and preferences regarding modifications, indicating some level of curiosity about the vehicle's history and attributes, but not a negative stance.
Negative: @62fj45 expresses skepticism regarding the speedometer's kilometers, initially drawn in by intrigue but questioning its appropriateness. @dawg critiques the vehicle's modifications, expressing a preference for its original state and concerns regarding specific alterations like the shackle reversal. This commentary indicates some buyers' hesitation, particularly about authenticity and customizations that may detract from its original character.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express excitement and admiration for the BMW R Nine T Racer, highlighting its aesthetic appeal, rarity, and performance capabilities. @JimiP mentioned that the bike looks great after correcting the handlebars, emphasizing it as a significant improvement. @Rianf1 called it the "best looking modern motorcycle" he's seen, especially with the raised handlebars that enhance usability. Additionally, users like @70_duster and @MickeyValentine noted the bike's retro styling and low mileage, expressing hope for successful bids and further customization, demonstrating a strong positive sentiment around its design and potential ownership experiences.
Neutral: Several discussions focused on the bike's production details, rarity, and maintenance. @ca1dirkid provided insights on the production numbers, stating 4,618 units were made, and noted that the Racer is popular among different markets. The conversation also touched on the rarity of certain models, such as the Speciale, which adds to the interest among potential buyers. @Rianf1 shared his experience, which contributes to the overall knowledge exchange about the Racer's specifications and history while maintaining a focus on factual data about its sales and delivery estimates without an overtly positive or negative slant.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the bike's low mileage and potential long-term storage issues. @ca1dirkid expressed worries about the maintenance history due to its age and minimal use, wondering how such factors might affect the engine's performance. @JimiP suggested not to overthink this aspect, advocating for the bike's durability, yet acknowledging that the concerns stem from a desire for assurance regarding the bike's condition. Despite the worries about maintenance, the general consensus leans towards optimism, with an understanding that these bikes are built to last.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received positive recognition for its unique Bermuda Blue color and solid reputation as a dependable SUV. Commenter @Longmire45 appreciates the truck's great appearance and anticipates that the bidding will generate excitement. @70_duster and @Bob_Jackson emphasize the GMT800 platform's reliability, suggesting that it's one of the best made by GM and has reshaped expectations for future vehicles. The seller, @xjhigg, responds enthusiastically, highlighting the meticulous care from previous owners and the mechanical integrity of the Suburban, which drives smoothly without any issues, and is ready for immediate use.
Neutral: Several commenters have posed inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifics, such as @kj1616 requesting pictures of the dog legs and rockers, indicating a curiosity about potential rust issues. @lanepartyof6 mentions an oil pressure gauge issue, while @ronsstuff inquires about the vehicle's reliability for longer trips and whether the seller is willing to facilitate buyer transportation from the airport. @jplinn0589 raises questions regarding the age of the tires and brake pad depth, showing interest in the truck's maintenance status, yet this reflects a neutral standpoint where the vehicle's value and performance are yet to be confirmed further.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's minor issues and potential maintenance needs. @lanepartyof6's query regarding the oil pressure gauge suggests a concern for the vehicle's reliability, while @ronsstuff questions whether the Suburban is trustworthy enough for a long-distance trip. The seller, @xjhigg, attempts to address these points by assuring that the vehicle has recently completed long trips and that necessary repairs like a faulty airbag sensor have been properly fixed, indicating transparency but also pointing to the existence of issues needing attention.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle for its aesthetics and performance. @Cars3D describes it as a 'great looking car,' while @JakeTheSnake115 adds that it's 'so pretty.' @70_duster highlights its impressive capabilities, stating it looks stunning, sounds incredible, and achieves speeds over 200 MPH. Several commenters like @ReLegendsCZ and @brighton_corgi also express admiration, calling it a 'beauty' and a 'really special car.' Furthermore, @The_ChiangCollection appreciates this model as one of the best iterations from Aston during this era, emphasizing the rarity of such super sedans and wishing good luck to the future buyer.
Neutral: Some comments express curiosity about specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @graciata raises questions about service records and the potential for curb rash on the wheels. In a response to @JeepJK4evr, @NA1Driver clarifies that while there may be some wear on the stitching of the driver's seat bolster, it is not ripped, suggesting it is common wear for such vehicles. @fvenegascarlock (The Seller) explains that the dealership does not maintain a shared database for service records but provides details about the removal of PPF due to hard water spots, demonstrating transparency.
Negative: A few comments indicate concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @JeepJK4evr points out potential damage to the driver's seat bolster, prompting a rebuttal from @Friarmike84, who defends the car's overall quality and asks for more evidence regarding the claim. @graciata also inquires about any curb rash on the wheels, suggesting careful scrutiny of the vehicle's condition. The tone in these comments, particularly from @JeepJK4evr, could imply a level of skepticism about the car's visual presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed a strong appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and color. @Noisyboyz remarked on its gorgeous appearance, sharing a personal nostalgic tie to a similar model he drag raced in 1962. @Fuelieguy chimed in similarly, noting the beauty of the car as well, while others like @kinglaw praised it as a beautiful example reminiscent of a classic 1962 brochure car. The overall tone conveyed excitement and admiration for the Corvette, with many looking forward to potential purchases.
Neutral: Several individuals engaged in discussions seeking additional information and clarifications without conveying strong opinions either way. @61DualQuad raised a question about a possible issue with the trim, wondering if it looked bent in the images or if it was just the picture. Other comments, such as those from @gasclass9 and @SLM67, requested specifics about the vehicle's structural details and production dates, indicating a keen interest in ensuring the car's authenticity and integrity. Many commenters were interested in seeing more videos and photos of the car to better assess its condition.
Negative: There were some concerns regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, notably its engine specifications and some physical details. @Tonehound questioned the redline stated in the description, implying confusion about its accuracy. @mjgardella expressed a light-hearted plea for @noisyboyz to score a successful purchase, hinting at a history of unsuccessful attempts. Additionally, @nosnilmot raised inquiries about the condition of the hardtop mentioned in the description, suggesting there may be uncertainty or concern about the vehicle's complete condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed their admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance. @bmchan highlighted the appealing color combination, while @Juggs44 praised the seller's meticulous care of the vehicle and recommended his videos for potential buyers. Several comments, such as those from @Stingtracy and @mattygatch, emphasized the beauty and rarity of the racing green color paired with a tan interior, noting that it is likely to make the next owner very happy. Others like @dhoeger and @Peller80 simply described the car as lovely and fantastic, indicating a strong appreciation for its overall presentation and condition.
Neutral: Comments have also noted the significance of the seller's YouTube channel in shaping perceptions of the car. @BEK_Boston mentioned the surprise at seeing the auction announcement, reflecting a blend of emotions for the community around the car. @Campodf and @SoGi both acknowledged the seller's influence in the automotive sphere, with Campodf specifically stating his motivation to seek out a green Boxster based on the seller's content. However, there were discussions regarding logistics such as seating comfort and suitability for larger drivers, which were addressed directly by the seller to provide clarity to potential bidders.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters expressed skepticism about the bidding process and the potential for the car's price to reach unrealistic levels. @ZilvinasV mentioned that the car might not match the KBB value despite its perceived worth, hinting at a concern among bidders regarding the auction dynamics. Additionally, @RazorB raised questions about the car's mechanical history and previous repairs, indicating a natural hesitancy that comes with purchasing a vehicle of this nature. The mention of issues like possible rodent damage by @RazorB also created some unease about the car's condition, though @ahendy, the seller, promptly reassured him by ensuring there was no evidence of prior rodent issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TaylorBro emphasizes the rarity and originality of the 1972 Honda CL175 Scrambler, stating that it is one of the few true original examples available, with just over 400 original miles. He mentions that the bike has been stored indoors its entire life and is 99% factory original, showcasing the originality of components including tires and upholstery. The preservation of the bike is characterized as reminiscent of a time capsule, indicating its appeal to collectors looking for unmodified, original motorcycles.
Neutral: @flal79 inquires about the bike's original mileage and any historical context from its purchase while @WKC questions whether the bike had been left exposed to the elements, noting some unfortunate rust, yet acknowledges the bike appears in good condition aside from that. @TaylorBro provides reassurance regarding the bike's condition and carefully explains that the rust is superficial, which is typical for a motorcycle of its age, and he expresses willingness to answer further questions.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks about the bike's preservation, @WKC notes the presence of rust as a drawback. @AustinDemo62 seems to be enthusiastic about a potential restoration with minimal effort, suggesting some use of products like WD-40 for maintenance but does not specifically mention any negative aspects. Meanwhile, @braktrcr speculates on competing models being released in the near future, suggesting a potential downside regarding market competition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, particularly noting its 2004 model year as the last with traditional glass headlights, appreciated by @Oldnfast and remarked to have potential appeal due to its historical significance in Volvo's lineup. @kostasd praised the impressive Carfax service history and the car's ability to perform well in snowy conditions, characterizing it as a well-loved workhorse. Comments also highlighted the vehicle's appealing color combination and low mileage, with @thatsgreatj emphasizing that there is much to like about the car's features and overall presentation.
Neutral: Several participants acknowledged the vehicle's condition and history. @vfnrcc (The Seller) provided details about the vehicle's inspection, emphasizing a thorough test drive and the belief in its excellent condition, offering transparency in communication regarding the sale. Inquiries about the vehicle's features, such as the manual transmission and the presence of roof rails, reflect a keen interest in specifics but do not convey strong preference either way. Additionally, comments from @COLNATE and @GRG1 sought clarifications on the vehicle's suspension and factory option packages, indicating involvement but with a more analytical perspective.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the vehicle in the comments. @kbd09 questioned whether the front bumper had been replaced or repainted, hinting at potential issues with the vehicle's bodywork. @fearless67 sought more information regarding the timing belt service, specifically about whether the relevant components, like tensioners and water pump, were also addressed. Questions about the suspension and turbo conditions from @COLNATE show a level of caution typical among potential buyers looking for assurance on the integrity of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentators praise the vehicle's condition and suggest that its current owner can enjoy it without the typical maintenance concerns associated with an E46 M3. @jarllewis remarks on the fantastic wheels and interior, while @E36M34ME recalls that this M3 looks like a rare exception to the usual budget maintenance required for such used vehicles. Additionally, @RuHeffna expresses excitement about the car and wishes everyone good luck with bidding, highlighting the contentious spirit surrounding the vehicle, which is recognized as a great car.
Neutral: Several inquiries indicate that potential buyers are seeking clarification and further details about the car's features and history. @slowturbo questions various aspects like the condition of the drive belts, the status of the driver's side window, and the factory paint, while also initiating a discussion on the rear bumper's condition. @kmaset requests additional photos and confirmation on specifics, such as the oil service and pinstripes, suggesting a cautious approach to bidding.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's minor imperfections are mentioned. @slowturbo points out possible damage or repairs to the rear bumper and the appearance of indentations on the bumper from license plate screws. @kmaset also notes a potential dent and requests close-up photos, indicating that while the car is generally well-received, there are some aspects that may warrant scrutiny before purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MonsterSales describes the Audi A7 TDi as a beautifully maintained vehicle with a striking Dakota Grey Pearl Effect paint and 20-inch RS wheels, which are currently outfitted with excellent Michelin tires. The car is noted for being a one-owner California vehicle that has undergone comprehensive maintenance including a valley reseal, coolant system replacement, and engine mount replacements. The seller assures that the car offers an excellent driving experience, claiming it has over 100k miles of life left and delivers great fuel efficiency, making it a solid investment for potential bidders.
Neutral: @LikeWatt appreciates the proactive maintenance performed, particularly the valley reseal, and asks about the car's usage, maintenance history, and servicing of the transmission. @jjblbi inquires about the presence of keys, window sticker, owner's manual, and the functionality of all car features, asking for a closer look at a dent on the hood. @ak87991 raises a question about the timing chains of the engine, seeking confirmation on whether they are original and requesting camshaft adaptation values.
Negative: The comments do not include significant negative feedback about the vehicle. However, @ak87991's concerns regarding the timing chains suggest a level of scrutiny regarding the car's potential long-term maintenance needs. Despite these inquiries, the overall sentiment is that bidders are interested and the vehicle is perceived positively, with no severe red flags raised.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BirdIsDaWord complimented the Jeep Wrangler, noting its appealing color and expressing a desire to be closer to Arizona to purchase it. @INtErNeT_rYaN appreciated the appearance of the Sahara model equipped with 17-inch wheels, which they found visually preferable compared to the 18-inch wheels in basic silver. @oneleatherneck (The Seller) also expressed a fondness for the vehicle's color, acknowledging it's time to find a new owner who would appreciate it as much as they do.
Neutral: Multiple users posed questions to the seller regarding the vehicle's condition and logistics. @Dleebr inquired about potential oil leaks, exhaust manifold cracks, and the tire date code. @adiluzio, who is currently away but is interested in the auction, asked if the seller could hold the vehicle until they return, while @19Willys46 reminded them they need to place a bid to win. @Lussierhomes sought information on local shipping options, and @68Targa raised concerns about the well-known 'death wobble' issue associated with 2007 models.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the condition of the vehicle. @onlyoriginalcars hinted at the possible presence of dog hair and a related odor due to allergies, although @oneleatherneck (The Seller) clarified that the dog was only in the vehicle briefly and that there was no noticeable smell. @Dleebr's inquiries about oil leaks and exhaust cracks indicate a cautious approach from potential buyers, while @68Targa's question about 'death wobble' suggests lingering worries about common mechanical problems associated with that model year.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Boombox44 praised the vehicle as a "Nice looking rig!" which suggests a positive perception of its overall aesthetics and condition.
Neutral: @Rylan52 inquired about the tailgate trim replacement on the vehicle, indicating an interest in its maintenance or modifications. @RickOtt asked about a discoloration under the hood and requested to take a look in person, which shows a willingness to investigate further. @jms88 sought clarification about the functionality of both fuel tanks and requested a driving video, reflecting a desire for additional information. Similarly, @JohnCaseyClark echoed this request for a video of the truck in action and its performance in 4-wheel drive.
Negative: @amcqueen228 raised concern about a leaking rear transfer case and questioned if it had been checked recently, highlighting potential maintenance issues. Additionally, @RickOtt's inquiry about the discoloration under the hood may suggest worries about the vehicle's condition, possibly leading to doubts in the vehicle’s reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2021 Mercedes-AMG S63 Cabriolet has received numerous compliments for its stunning appearance and luxury features. @SNDThomas, the seller, highlights that this model is the final year for the S63 Cabriolet, making it a highly desirable collector's item. The Exclusive Java Nappa leather interior is frequently praised, with many commenters agreeing that it beautifully complements the overall design of the vehicle. @Endever notes that the car stands out due to its unique color combination, which diverges from the standard bland offerings typically seen in luxury cars. Additionally, the overall quality and rarity of the car, along with well-thought-out modifications like the top replacement and wheel changes, have been positively received by most commentors.
Neutral: Some aspects of the car, such as the changes made by @SNDThomas, sparked a debate among potential buyers and enthusiasts. While several commenters like @clean_machina and @gscharnagl support the aesthetic adjustments like changing the top from blue to black and upgrading the wheels, others expressed curiosity about the original configuration and its variations. @Dweck inquired about the presence of DISTRONIC Plus cruise control, while @Vanhauwer was curious about the rationale behind the top color change. This illustrates that potential buyers are keen on understanding the details and features of the car, seeking clarity about what constitutes its true value and appeal.
Negative: There were a few reservations mentioned regarding the modifications made to the vehicle. @raykosh expressed mixed feelings about the aftermarket AMG-style wheels, indicating that they may not appeal to everyone and might detract from the original design. @cardude76 remarked on the current auction prices, suggesting that they reflect the car's true worth while acknowledging the depreciation of luxury vehicles, which might discourage some bidders. Additionally, @MASchaefer brought attention to potential issues with the wheel orientation, highlighting a lack of understanding that these are intentional design elements rather than errors. Overall, while the excitement around the car is prevalent, concerns about modifications and pricing have surfaced among some commentors.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's elegant and classy interior and exterior designs. @Fairmont663336 remarked on the classy and elegant interior, while @Nowdow shared their own positive experience with a similar Panamera model, highlighting its reliability and superb driving performance on both highways and mountain roads. @ApexAutoVault (The Seller) also shared their personal enjoyment of the vehicle, noting its excellent condition and stating it might be one of the best specifications of a Panamera they've seen in person, indicating how well it has been maintained by the original owner.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific details regarding the vehicle's service history, maintenance records, and performance features. @TrailerNoob requested service records due to concerns over the car's age, while @Nated76 asked if the air conditioning blows cold and if the ventilated seats function as expected. The seller, @ApexAutoVault, responded to these inquiries by stating the car had minimal service needs, low mileage, and that the air conditioning and seat functionalities are confirmed to be operational, providing reassurance to potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding the car's condition and features. @TrailerNoob asked about the grease on the rear carpet and requested additional photos to verify cleanliness in that area. @KeithAlley questioned why the rear spoiler was up when parked, wanting to understand if it functioned properly and sought clarification on the operation of the spoiler. @evenstay16 also expressed unease about potentially hearing a ticking sound from the engine bay, indicating a desire for reassurance about the vehicle's mechanical state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Stingtracy expressed excitement about the car's tartan interior and its color, wishing the seller good luck. The seller, @autocentroimports, shared enthusiasm about the 1975 914 and highlighted the extensive care the car had received, mentioning over $10,000 invested to bring it into excellent condition. The seller encouraged potential buyers to view the multitude of detailed photographs and videos available to appreciate the vehicle's quality, which many commenters echoed positively, noting the effort put into maintaining the car.
Neutral: Commenters like @IrishGreen914 and @Stropp acknowledged the impressive work done on the car while also raising practical points about the absence of a center console for the gauges or suggesting potential interior modifications. @MCShack provided historical context about modifications made to the vehicle, asking about documentation and detailing the original engine and color, which added depth to the discussion. @BurningDinos weighed the dealer fee's presentation, suggesting it might be easier accepted if included in the reserve price despite it being viewed as a non-issue by some.
Negative: Several commenters expressed frustration regarding the dealer fee, with @notlikelytowin4 stating that it was off-putting, while @mikeor questioned the necessity of such fees. @Ted_P. and @BurningDinos reiterated that though the fee was small, it created negative sentiment among potential buyers, suggesting a preference for including such costs in the auction price. Additionally, @Slim_Chance pointed out an issue with the rear window squeaking, citing the vehicle's age as a factor while raising concerns about potential wear and tear.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Garcia_2026 praised the vehicle, describing it as a "beauty," while @phatfill expressed a preference for the 6.0 model, mentioning that if the issues had been addressed, he would choose this vehicle over others. @JustaGlitch commended the seller for how they presented the engine bay, indicating attention to detail. @stephenmitsv (The Seller) also received appreciation from the community for the overall condition and maintenance of the vehicle, assuring potential buyers that it drives well and has a full service history.
Neutral: Several comments focused on asking questions regarding the vehicle's original features and specifications. @brooksgn inquired if the original headlights and brush guard were included, while @6thone requested the window sticker and details about the mirrors and audio system. @ZX9RCAM raised concerns about the oil change history, leading to a clarification from @stephenmitsv (The Seller) about the vehicle's maintenance records and the recent oil service done weeks prior to the auction. @phatfill noted the rising diesel prices in his area, possibly affecting his buying decision.
Negative: Commentary included skepticism from some users about the vehicle's modifications, with @luv2sleep1985 criticizing the EPA-related alterations as "cancerous" and questioning their necessity. @brooksgn reminded @knobleinc that the vehicle would likely sell at a higher price if better photos were taken. @ZX9RCAM also highlighted some discrepancies in the oil change information provided by @stephenmitsv (The Seller), hinting at potential issues with transparency. Additionally, @scb315's comments about scheduling an inspection suggested that there might be barriers to viewing the vehicle in person.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle, a BMW 335i, has received favorable comments about its performance and condition. @Jfolckemer, the seller, has maintained that the car runs and drives perfectly without any leaks, and the AC is functioning well. He highlights that extensive work has been done to ensure the car is in great shape, including new tires, added TPMS sensors, a new windscreen, and replacing ignition coils and plugs. The seller enthusiastically mentions the car's great driving experience and readiness for test drives, which has attracted positive attention from potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries have been made regarding specific aspects of the vehicle's condition, with prospective buyers asking about technical details like turbo performance, injector replacements, and the convertible top's operation. @Jfolckemer addresses these queries by reassuring that the car does not leak oil, the transmission fluid looks good, and the convertible top functions smoothly. Some commenters have expressed interest in the vehicle, asking for more videos and information about its maintenance history, demonstrating a general interest without negative connotations.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the car's components, such as the missing intake tube to the airbox, which @Jfolckemer acknowledged but indicated that he has already purchased a replacement. @genous also expressed skepticism about a potential exhaust issue and the car's heating. Though @Jfolckemer assures that the vehicle does not exhibit any leaks or serious problems, the questions reflect some uncertainty among potential buyers about the overall reliability and completeness of the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the vehicle as a fantastic burnt orange metallic Bronco, highlighting the quality of the build and noting the enthusiastic early bidding. @HotVette echoed this sentiment by complimenting the amazing appearance of the Bronco and described the build as very nice, encouraging participants in the bidding process. @Smclemore, the seller, expressed gratitude for the interest, bids, and comments from the community, inviting further questions and interaction from potential buyers.
Neutral: @Ngsd101 inquired about the CA VIN tag, asking for clarification on whether the frame was also stamped with a matching VIN. @crowbush questioned if the burnt orange color was a factory option for the 1970 model, to which @Johnnycab responded that it was a color available in 1974. @Sandman67 sought information about who performed the build and expressed curiosity regarding the VIN, showing a balanced interest in the vehicle's details without overt criticism.
Negative: There were no particularly negative comments in the discussion, but inquiries regarding the frame's VIN and the reasoning behind the absence of front flares suggest some concerns among potential buyers about the vehicle's modifications and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's appearance and features, noting its appealing color combination and modifications. @motts911targa praised the color, wishing good luck with the auction. @corkscrewlife found the car visually appealing, likening its look to that of an air-cooled speedster when the soft top is down. Additionally, @tommy911t admired the wood steering wheel and gear knob, describing them as the 'cherry on top' of the setup. The seller, @NoCents, also highlighted the car's no reserve auction status, emphasizing that it is an excellent time to purchase in the spring as the car would be perfect for top-down drives.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific features and modifications of the vehicle, showcasing a cautious interest in the purchase. Questions about the IMS bearing replacement were prominent, with @AFTO57 and @Doctordel seeking clarification on its status. @jcasper89 asked about the rear spoiler removal and whether the clamshell fits when the top is up, to which the seller responded that the holes were filled with removable plugs. The seller addressed various tweaks and repairs, indicating that some adjustments, like those to coilovers, could be done easily either personally or by a mechanic, and confirmed that the clamshell is secure at speed.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition were raised regarding the IMS bearing and the potential for leaks due to a tear in the soft top, with @clenkeit specifically questioning the visibility of damage in the auction photos. The seller admitted the IMSB has not been replaced, which could deter some buyers, despite suggesting that it was not currently an issue. There were also inquiries about whether the removed spoiler left permanent modifications to the car, reflecting the cautious nature of potential bidders about the vehicle's history and condition. @Fargie expressed concern about the extreme height of the coilovers, indicating worries about the ride quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed great admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its appearance and condition. @Dugbam described it as a 'great looking ride,' indicating enthusiasm for the model. @carstruck emphasized the durability of the vehicle by referencing their own model's resilience, even after 300,000 miles, and commended Toyota for their excellent paint quality. @TheHulk0316 and @matthews_727 also highlighted the old 4Runners' appeal, with the latter noting its 'unbelievable condition' and referring to it as an 'outlier.' Overall, there is a clear appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and build quality.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's maintenance and features. @mbloomdog (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the car's history, detailing that it has been free from smoking and pets and includes minimal blemishes. The seller also mentioned that the majority of its miles are freeway miles and that it has always been garaged, which contributes to its pristine condition. There were requests for a driving video and information on service intervals, showing that potential buyers are interested in the vehicle's operational aspects rather than just its looks.
Negative: While there were no overt criticisms of the vehicle, some commenters raised questions and concerns that could imply uncertainty regarding its condition. @wbates12 inquired about potential squeaks or rattles, while @switchon4go asked about the frequency of oil changes and the status of the brakes, indicating a desire for detailed mechanical transparency. Additionally, the seller’s acknowledgment of a slight blemish on the bumper might suggest that buyers are looking for perfection in such a well-preserved vehicle, which could pose a minor drawback for some potential purchasers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the Continental Mark II for its beautiful design and condition. @OWLBYRD described it as "absolutely gorgeous," and @Dollycat3 found it "stunning and stylish" with an exceptional interior. The seller, @Significant_Cars, noted the car runs and drives well, emphasizing its high-quality restoration and the impressive collection from which it comes. @elipper expressed confidence in the seller, regarding the car as a significant example.
Neutral: Some commenters had neutral observations regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. @Vpl1116 inquired about the car's paint and possible use of body filler, while @jimmc9876 discussed the impact of the non-functional air conditioning on resale value. @Capt._Doug acknowledged the car's significance in American automotive design, suggesting potential modern updates, but did not express strong opinions about its current condition beyond praising its restoration.
Negative: However, there were some criticisms about the car. @rbernard1984 lamented that the car was not kept in its factory finish, while @jcp911s raised concerns about the costs associated with preserving such a vehicle, suggesting it might be an arduous and expensive commitment. The need for a functional A/C system was also mentioned by several users, with @jimmc9876 stating that it could negatively affect resale value. Overall, while many found the car appealing, there were valid concerns regarding its condition and the costs involved in ownership.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TheHulk0316 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, calling it a really awesome find and wishing the seller luck with the sale. @Ep90266 remarked on the car's potential for reliability, stating it could run for over 250,000 miles with regular maintenance. @Nibo shared a positive personal experience, describing it as one of the best Toyotas he's driven, expressing admiration for its performance and reliability, and noting how much he and his family loved the car.
Neutral: @VantageAuto (The Seller) provided insight into the vehicle's features, confirming before @CarFoolLane that the leather trim package was indeed an option and clarifying the model's options. The seller also explained the lack of service records regarding the timing belt and water pump but reassured potential buyers about the car's functionality. Additionally, @JustBob asked about the availability of satellite radio, while others questioned the absence of a sunroof, discussing how this impacts their perception of the vehicle.
Negative: @johnduh raised a concern about the age of the current tires, suggesting that they should ideally be replaced due to their age. @Longmire45 echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the importance of tire replacement based on the manufacturer's recommendations and expressing that it should be a priority for the new owner. @Ropadope's confusion over the absence of a sunroof pointed to a perceived deficiency in the vehicle's options, suggesting that it should have included this feature.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @illirep praised the vehicle as a 'beautiful car', while @haydenjgray confirmed that it looks just as stunning in person, stating that the engine sounds well cared for and advising bidders to bid with confidence. Additionally, @fretchh remarked on the cleanliness of the car and shared their appreciation for the steering wheel, which is the same as the one in their own vehicle. @Techdude99 added that having air conditioning is a great feature, suggesting the car is likely to perform well in the auction. Other commenters like @BeardedImports and @East556 echoed the positive sentiment, calling it a beautiful car and noting its rarity in decent condition.
Neutral: @Hondaboy164456 (The Seller) engaged actively with commenters, thanking them for their input and providing more information about the vehicle. They also addressed inquiries about the Japanese grading, indicating they would post the CarVX report to affirm the car's high quality. @Aubrey and @lilcarlover raised questions about the car's paint condition and the reason for the sale, leading @Hondaboy164456 to explain that the car had been mostly untouched except for the front bumper, which has been repainted, as well as mentioning their reason for selling to fund other opportunities.
Negative: There were some inquiries that hinted at potential concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding @Aubrey's questions about the repaint and overspray on the fender wells. @WrongSideMotors was curious about the absence of documentation on the car's grading. The seller, @Hondaboy164456, acknowledged the questions and attempted to clarify, but the inquiries may suggest some buyers feel uncertain about certain aspects of the car's history. Additionally, @CTRGOD’s comment about missing a driving video hinted that potential buyers may find the limited media options a drawback.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg praised the Steel Grey color of the E63, calling it sublime and complimenting the stunning photos that feature a beautiful backdrop. @Wentlandt also noted the sublime lighting in the photos, further enhancing temptation for potential buyers. The seller, @CompassRacing, emphasized the car's excellent condition as a well-cared-for one-owner vehicle and invited bidders to view it in person or via video call, showcasing transparency and dedication to customer service.
Neutral: @CompassRacing provided detailed insights into the vehicle's registration status, indicating it is based in Washington state and that a smog certificate would be available for California bidders. They actively engaged with questions from potential buyers regarding vehicle specs and history, such as discussions about the P30 package and service records. Additionally, @Mercerized listed out detailed vehicle specifications obtained from a VIN decoder, enhancing the informational aspect of the auction.
Negative: Concerns were raised by several users regarding service history, particularly about the head bolts and whether they had been replaced, with @om3inous specifically calling attention to the risk of head bolt issues in that engine range. @sord and @47istoocool4u expressed disappointment, asserting that the car likely does not possess the P30 option and lacks a limited-slip differential, which would affect its desirability. Overall, there was a mix of intrigue and skepticism about the overall condition and option packages of the E63.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @05CleanXLR (The Seller) shares a heartfelt story, mentioning that the XLR was purchased for their father on his 75th birthday and has been well-loved over the years. The vehicle has been kept in a garage, rarely seeing rain, and maintained in its original condition with only a Sirius radio tuner added. The seller notes that the car starts reliably and runs smoothly, emphasizing the stunning red metallic paint that catches attention when the hardtop is down, highlighting the aesthetic and emotional value of the vehicle.
Neutral: @ColoTom asks typical questions regarding the vehicle's condition, inquiring about potential leaks and the tire dates, showing a discerning interest in the car's mechanical aspects. The seller, @05CleanXLR, responds that there are no leaks from the top hydronics, confirms that the truck struts have been replaced, and commits to providing the tire date shortly. The seller also assures potential bidders that they will be responsive to questions as the auction approaches its conclusion.
Negative: While the seller describes the overall condition as good, they do mention some minor issues such as a parking lot bump on the driver rear bumper with paint peel and wear on the driver seat bolster. This suggests that while the car is in good working condition, it does have some aesthetic flaws that potential buyers should consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the aesthetics and performance of the '69 Firebird, particularly highlighting its beautiful Palladium Silver and black vinyl top color combination. @boaboyoz referred to it as a 'wicked Washington Firebird' and expressed admiration for the car's design integrity. @JBplays and others appreciated how well the color complemented the Firebird's body lines, underlining its visual appeal and classic look. @ICTGOAT and @Alaskastang both acknowledged the car's enjoyable driving experience, with @Alaskastang noting the ease of sourcing parts for the swapped Chevy 350 engine, which he found acceptable given the history of such swaps in classic cars.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the technical aspects of the vehicle, particularly regarding the rear end gear ratio, which @Bigsads noted to be 3.73 gears based on documentation. The seller confirmed that the gauges are mostly functional, with a minor caveat about the gas gauge being temperamental. @ClassicFirebird69 also provided insights into the car's history regarding the bonded title and described a previous issue with tire rubbing that was fixed with proper alignment. The seller is responsive and willing to provide further information or videos to interested buyers, including driving footage of the vehicle.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters expressed hesitation or disappointment concerning the non-original Chevy 350 engine swapped into the Firebird. @jprobisheaux emphasized their disapproval of replacing a Pontiac motor, reflecting a strong preference among enthusiasts for maintaining the original engine configuration. Additionally, @JBplays raised concerns about a clunking noise that was previously noted in service records, though @ClassicFirebird69 clarified that the issue had been resolved with an alignment. These sentiments highlight a divide among classic car enthusiasts regarding modifications to vintage vehicles.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments indicate that the E500 is well-regarded for its overall good condition, comfort, and enjoyable driving experience. @sourenaj1994 shared that the vehicle was a gift for his wife, highlighting its sentimental value and frequent use over the years. Several repairs and updates have been made, such as detailing, replacing the battery and windshield, and installing new rear airbags, which reflects the seller's commitment to maintaining the car in good shape for its new owner. @sourenaj1994 also elaborated on the car's performance, noting the impressive power of the 5.0 V8 engine and the comfortable ride.
Neutral: The comments also include some inquiries from potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and specific components. @912Pcar expressed confusion regarding the rear shock leak in conjunction with the recently replaced air bags. In response, @sourenaj1994 clarified that the air bags and dampers are distinct components, indicating a transparent communication between the seller and interested parties about the car's maintenance. Additionally, @petegrv79 asked about any codes, to which @sourenaj1994 confirmed there are no check engine lights, though there is a malfunction related to a marker light.
Negative: Despite the positives, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's condition that were raised by potential buyers. @912Pcar pointed out the contradiction regarding the rear shock leak despite the new airbags being installed, suggesting potential oversight in the car's maintenance. Furthermore, @sourenaj1994 listed several issues that would need attention, such as a leaking left-rear shock, missing trim on the driver's seat base, and cracked seals on the door and mirror, which may discourage some interested buyers. While these imperfections were disclosed by the seller, they could impact the overall attractiveness of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its reliability and simplicity. @TheHulk0316 calls the car "amazing" and appreciates its solid analog 5-speed transmission, describing it as "absolutely bulletproof." @KurtBWNews mentions he knows someone who routinely drives such vehicles over 200k miles, affirming its durability. @Caymanorcarrera and @70_duster both praise its low mileage and the bygone era of simple cars, aiming to revive the nostalgia associated with vehicles like this Toyota Corolla. Additionally, comments from @JimKaniki and @yma10 reinforce the idea that this car represents the best in affordability and reliability, likely to last generations with proper maintenance.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @cudaconv (The Seller), engage with potential buyers and address queries regarding the car's condition and history. The seller responds to concerns raised by @TheHulk0316 about potential odors, rust, and maintenance, reassuring prospects with detailed answers and offering to provide more photographs. Another user, @smunamm, asks about scheduling a pre-purchase inspection, showing interest in ensuring the vehicle's quality before committing.
Negative: While the overall sentiment is positive, @TheHulk0316 points out potential issues regarding rust on the vehicle, asking for more in-depth photos of specific areas. There are hints of cautious optimism about the car's history, particularly regarding a minor accident referenced in its report, which could cause concerns for some buyers. @MadMotorClub humorously notes the time left in the auction while cautioning the seller about different time zones, suggesting some bidders might miss the deadline, indicating a minor oversight in communication.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive condition and its nostalgic appeal. @WCD2020, the seller, emphasizes that this 1983 Ford F150 XLT is a one-owner vehicle that has been well-preserved for 43 years, displaying its original Candy Apple Red over Dark Red Metallic finish and XLT trim. Commentors like @Greenmachines1 and @1Hotshot praise the quality of the seller’s photos, likening them to sales brochures. Additionally, @VonMagnusson describes the truck as 'stunning' and commends its overall aesthetic, further underscoring its desirability among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several comments express admiration for the vehicle while also acknowledging a desire for improvements in future vehicle designs. @Button suggests a return to real two-tone paint and colored interiors, reflecting a nostalgic longing for classic truck aesthetics. The seller, @WCD2020, notes that while this Ford is a rarity worth appreciating, many restored examples exist today, indicating that collectors may have various options at their disposal. @Todd_Z. mentions his curiosity about how the truck has maintained its excellent condition over the years, signaling a broader interest in the story behind such well-preserved vehicles.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are a few critiques regarding the truck's condition. @BMaddren requests more images to clarify what seems like dents and issues with the drip rail, which introduces some concern about the vehicle's preservation. The seller acknowledges these points, but the mention of minor imperfections like a tear in the carpet and bubbling headliner may deter some potential buyers. While the comments do not overwhelmingly criticize the truck, they hint at the need for transparency regarding its state before purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @coloradoan provides a detailed account of the vehicle's features and condition, stating that the OEM upper screen functions properly and displays HVAC controls. The car is praised for its reliability, as the engine, the well-regarded 2GR-FE, runs strong with no issues reported during the owner's time. Additionally, significant investments have been made to enhance the car, including a high-quality AV system, professional tinting, and protective floor liners, which indicate good maintenance and care for the vehicle.
Neutral: @TheHulk0316 asked various questions about the vehicle's maintenance history, including whether the rubber VVT-i oil line had been replaced, and how the dash surface looked, which @coloradoan addressed with specific responses. The owner mentioned some cracks in the dash but emphasized that the overall condition was good, and detailed that while the transmission fluid had not been changed, it remained in good condition. The seller also clarified the status of features like the climate control blend doors and the rear sunshade, noting they were functional despite some noises.
Negative: @WIZZZZ inquired about the original spark plugs and an accident report mentioned on the CARFAX. @coloradoan indicated that the spark plugs are likely original but that they were in good condition according to a mechanic's inspection. Furthermore, the seller did not have additional details on the "minor damage" reported on the vehicle's history but maintained that the car runs and drives as expected. Overall, there are some minor concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and history, which potential buyers may want to consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @racerboy221 praises the vehicle as a "lovely time capsule," indicating a sense of nostalgia and admiration for its condition. @Dean_Laumbach (The Seller) confidently describes the car as an excellent representation of its category, highlighting its performance and readiness for enjoyment, while also noting the low mileage and auction details. @Luz_do_sol appreciates the car's stunning features, such as its distinct exterior color, luxurious leather interior, and well-maintained condition, emphasizing the professional approach taken in its presentation and documentation.
Neutral: @Dean_Laumbach (The Seller) provides insights into the car's recent maintenance and video documentation that further supports its value. He mentions a replacement trim piece and explains the situation regarding the car's rear quarter panel paint, showing a commitment to transparency. @Garp1234 asks pertinent questions about the maintenance history of the hydraulics and paintwork, demonstrating a reasonable level of concern for potential buyers.
Negative: @Garp1234 raises issues regarding the hydraulics and the painted rear quarter panel, which may indicate potential concerns for buyers. Although @Dean_Laumbach responds with assurances about the roof's functionality and the lack of significant repairs, the lack of documentation for the paintwork may leave some buyers hesitant. Overall, such concerns reflect a cautious view of the car's condition, despite its many appealing attributes.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @67numberfive (The Seller) welcomes bidders to the auction, emphasizing the fantastic nature of the S2K and inviting potential buyers for viewings at their Monterey facility. They engage positively with commenters, providing additional information about the vehicle and sharing a spirited driving video to highlight the car's fun aspects.
Neutral: @3H0nda0rphans pointed out that the car's fourth appearance in five years on the auction site raises questions about its market status, while @tsuru inquired about a tow hook cover's color and potential power steering issues. @yk797 expressed curiosity about the condition of the front bumper and lip, prompting a clarification from @67numberfive that they are indeed rock chips under protective film from prior ownership.
Negative: @Planeman01 questioned the choice of floor mats, leading to an explanation from @67numberfive about the aftermarket Coco mats versus the stock ones. However, @Mystang86 raised a concern regarding the non-stock red front sway bar, suggesting a lack of originality. @Bozzbomber asked about the short prior ownership, indicating potential worries about the vehicle's reliability or desirability.
![]() |
Individual Fire Orange, 4,700-Mile 2012 BMW M3 Coupe Competition Package
WBSKG9C55CE798897
Lot 238499
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's rarity and design quality. @mrdeezy noted that the M3 tends to appreciate over time, indicating that it is a great investment. @jwhboomer praised the M3's distinctive color and overall driving experience, suggesting that it is desirable in any hue but particularly favored in orange. @gnal called the vehicle's specifications 'absolutely gorgeous,' sending best wishes to the seller and excitement for the auction.
Neutral: The seller, @K8s5286, provided clarifications regarding the car's condition and unique features, asserting that the underbody is pristine despite some previous miscommunications about its appearance. They also addressed inquiries regarding the auction reserve, confirming their decision to remove it and provide additional details about the vehicle's production numbers. Several commenters, such as @vinogradovsm and @daniel0204, were curious about the market value and rarity of the vehicle while seeking additional information, showing varying levels of interest in its history and pricing.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and auction strategy were also raised. @c_short questioned the reported damage to the driver side underbody, which @K8s5286 addressed, dismissing it as an issue of poor lighting. @daniel0204 hinted at skepticism over the production claims by seeking verification of the limited numbers, suggesting that there might be confusion or misinformation regarding the car's uniqueness. @jimbojsb expressed doubt about the auction's progress, implying that previous offers were significantly lower than expected.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GBRBiLL expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, stating it looks like fun. @formularacer highlighted the car as a great example of modern open wheel road racing formula cars, noting their consistency and reliability, especially for younger drivers. Additionally, @Farrahimi (The Seller) shared his background knowledge about the vehicle's history in the Fran-Am program, emphasizing its reliability and effective setups.
Neutral: @GLTL inquired about the classification of the 1.6L Fran-Am car, suspecting it competes in FS and requested information about its competition history. @wx8 asked about the size limitations for drivers fitting in the car and confirmed the features of an onboard starter and reverse gear. @canuk357 expressed curiosity about the SCCA logbook, referring to regulations and the potential classification issues for the vehicle based on the GCR.
Negative: @UrracosUnlimited complained about the competitiveness of the 2-liter cars in vintage categories, contrasting them unfavorably against their older chassis and motors, suggesting that competitors using them could easily outrun others on the track.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GBRBiLL comments on the vehicle's LT230 transfer case as a bonus and notes that while there is corrosion, it is not severe, especially considering conditions in Idaho. They express optimism about the rig's overall completeness and potential. @Type44 shares their appreciation for the color combination, favoring the grey interior over tan and reminisces about their history with the model, revealing a strong emotional connection and intent to keep their own. @jerimiahjohnson sees the vehicle as decent despite the noted rust, and suggests it may have a good future ahead due to its solid components.
Neutral: @Roverterv (The Seller) clarifies that they have owned the vehicle for several years and recently titled it due to a shift in focus to another project. They express a desire to see the vehicle restored, indicating it still holds value for them even if they do not have the time to work on it now. @WAGONBOYTD mentions the need for trailing arms in their list of repairs and reflects on the vehicle's historic charm despite its extensive rust, suggesting that old classics maintain their appeal regardless of their current condition.
Negative: @Peugeotdr raises concerns regarding the handling of the vehicle when put on a lift, expressing a sense of alarm about its condition. @WAGONBOYTD also highlights the severity of the rust, describing it with humor as "Fred Flintstone floors" which conveys a sense of the vehicle being in rough shape. This sentiment is echoed by other commenters who acknowledge the rust issues while noting it's worse than they might have expected for its location.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Brooksk02 compliments the vehicle's blacked-out grill, wheels, and bumpers, showcasing their appreciation for the aesthetics. @jrjohnso, the seller, acknowledges this positively, agreeing that the previous owner had them painted attractively. There are other positive comments regarding the vehicle's solid performance, highlighting how it starts reliably and shifts smoothly, with @cmbraithwaite noting its beauty and @hudd07 expressing excitement about the possibility of flat towing it, despite some confusion about towing capabilities.
Neutral: The seller, @jrjohnso, provides detailed information about modifications and repairs done by the previous owner as well as his own experience over the last five months. @DCwoods raises a question about the title status, to which @jrjohnso clarifies that it is a clean title despite what the Carfax report suggested. @Onicamay96 expresses their personal connection to the FJ60 and interest in potentially purchasing the vehicle, emphasizing their intention to create meaningful experiences with it.
Negative: There are concerns raised by users like @TheCrimsonCrawdad and @PBnJelly regarding the rapid resale of the vehicle after only six months of ownership. @TheCrimsonCrawdad suggests it might appear as though the seller is flipping the car, while @DCwoods questions the title history related to the vehicle. Additionally, @Onicamay96 points out uncertainties regarding the air conditioner functionality, which may indicate potential issues. Overall, the comments suggest mixed feelings about the reliability and selling timeline of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments highlight the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and rare features, with @johnnyvett calling it a 'high optioned 70' in an appealing color. @jmcd_tx and @N8J both described it as 'absolutely beautiful', further echoed by @AALIYAH123's admiration. Commenters like @Gidkid and @keith_k remarked on its unique history and comprehensive options, with @keith_k noting it has features not commonly found in its class. There is also appreciation for the extensive photo collection shared by the seller, with @JayKay2430 complimenting the thoroughness of the visual documentation.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in technical discussions about the vehicle's specifications, with @Joes124 asking for additional information about vital components like the cylinder head casting numbers. @Bigfletch requested more details about specific functionalities, such as cruise control and engine performance, while others like @Royce59 highlighted the need for spirited driving footage. @francistobin (The Seller) has actively responded to these queries, providing answers about options, restoration processes, and assembly details, indicating a strong commitment to transparency while auctioning the car.
Negative: On the critical side, some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's historical accuracy and specs, with @throwfor5 questioning the factory's decision to include a non-Posi rear end. @Greasegunner pointed out the lack of clarity regarding the shaker's functionality, and @MGB196990 challenged aspects of what is considered standard equipment based on the pictures provided. Commenters like @BaronVonZeppelin also noted a potential absence of important documentation about the vehicle's history, raising doubts about its originality and factory specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Sid_Kafizz complimented the vehicle by describing it as beautiful and praised its Guards Red color and Stone Grey interior for adding extra flair. @sdallasesq believes this could be the perfect driver ’00 S, stating that all necessary updates have been completed. The seller, @Lastchancegarage, expressed pride in the car, stating that after thorough maintenance and care, he has enjoyed driving it across multiple states over 12 years and has confidence in its reliability for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Rocky_Whatcott initially inquired about the IMS bearing and later admitted to not fully reading the advertisement, taking responsibility for that oversight. @NewUpper asked about the condition of various components like the AOS, water pump, belts, and other parts, as well as the cleaning of front radiators, indicating thoroughness in potential buyers’ inquiries. @D0EDB sought clarification on the dates of the tires and the rear main seal, demonstrating a desire for detailed information before making a purchase decision.
Negative: Some comments suggest concerns over certain aspects of the car's condition despite the seller's assurances. @D0EDB raised a question about the oil seepage, potentially indicating worry regarding engine integrity. Additionally, while the seller noted that the tires were older, he recommended that they be replaced due to their age, which might be a red flag for prospective owners wary of maintenance costs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments emphasize the truck's quality and performance, with @RWB_AZ praising it as another great truck from the PNW. @ajjolkowski expresses admiration for its beauty, while @FrostysAutos (The Seller) recounts a smooth drive back from Portland to Tacoma, noting no issues during the trip. The seller's involvement reinforces the truck's reliability, with @Wheelhouse69 and others highlighting its excellent mechanical condition, and @Gramirez036 affirming that both fuel tanks are functioning perfectly. Observations about the engine bay's presentation, including a comment from @JustaGlitch, further support a positive sentiment surrounding the truck's upkeep and originality.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, potential buyers seek more information about specific features and conditions. For instance, @Tmicheal7 inquires about the auction's reserve status, and @UncleBaldy requests clarity on the burn holes in the upholstery and the functionality of the cigar lighter. The seller, @FrostysAutos, promptly addresses these concerns, indicating a willingness to share additional details and photographs when needed. @cleandan raises a question regarding red overspray on components, to which the seller offers to clarify. Overall, these inquiries reflect genuine interest but do not compromise the overall positive sentiment toward the vehicle.
Negative: A few comments highlight concerns regarding the truck's condition, exemplified by @UncleBaldy's request for images of burn holes and functional aspects of the interior, indicating potential issues. Additionally, @Wheelhouse69 poses questions about the cigarette lighter, leaks, and maintenance records, expressing caution typically advised for older vehicles. @cleandan's observations about overspray spark a dialogue about the truck's paint and condition, as the seller attempts to reassure potential buyers regarding these claims. These negative points highlight the importance of transparency and thoroughness in addressing buyer skepticism surrounding used vehicles.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @watergate528 commented positively with a simple 'Nice.' indicating a favorable impression of the vehicle. @HardingNJAutoEmpire praised it as 'What a beautiful truck,' highlighting its aesthetic appeal and overall attractiveness.
Neutral: @CMC300M brought up an interesting question about the color of the vehicle, wondering why such vehicles tend to be 'old fart beige'. This comment reflects a neutral observation rather than a clear preference. @joehammer responded to this by suggesting a more optimistic perspective, referring to the color as 'Rebel Beige', which adds a bit of humor and a slight positive spin on the situation without taking a definitive stance on the truck.
Negative: @carguy669 raised a concern by asking, 'What is the story behind the low mileage?' which implies there might be something unusual or suspicious regarding the vehicle's condition or history that could be a red flag for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @zzzoooose mentions owning a similar Cobra #3469, calling it an awesome driver, which highlights the vehicle's performance and enjoyment. @JamesTH expresses affection for the car's over-the-top design yet feels that it works, suggesting a successful blending of style and function. @Buyinoc37 appreciates the aesthetic choice of not using chrome and dreams of having a gunmetal version with red accents, indicating strong visual appeal. @TedHopson wishes he could own two Cobras, stating that this particular model was a close second for him, showcasing the admiration and desirability surrounding this vehicle. @Hulk2000 shares a humorous take on the intimidation factor of the car as seen in photo #9, emphasizing its powerful presence on the road.
Neutral: Comments from @iLussoOC (The Seller) provide essential information regarding inquiries about the auction, as well as addressing questions from interested parties like @4StangBang and @Nickyreno about the vehicle and auction structure. @Superformance_Owner_Assn offers technical insight on the mechanical aspects of the vehicle, specifically regarding the removal of roll bars, which may be beneficial for potential buyers considering modifications. @iLussoOC also prompts users to engage with the listing through alerts and emphasizes an intent to keep them informed about future listings, reflecting an active approach to customer interaction.
Negative: User @notlikelytowin4 expresses skepticism about the auction process and the dealer fee, suggesting that they might withdraw from the bidding due to these issues, which reflects a negative experience regarding auction transparency. @JamesTH contributes to the negative sentiment by simply stating "It's just bad vibes innit?", indicating a discontented atmosphere. Additionally, @geldingmakr requests more multimedia content like cold starts and demonstration videos, pointing to a potential lack of adequate visual representation of the vehicle that may hinder interest in the auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Multiple commenters expressed enthusiasm about the 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 Cabriolet's condition and performance. @mfdoc shared a personal story about how the car served as great mental therapy during his health challenges, highlighting the car's pleasant driving experience. Another commenter, @Fleche_dOr, praised the car's balance and performance capabilities, stating it is a sporty option for leisurely drives, with substantial comfort. Overall, the car was perceived as an excellent value, given its well-maintained condition and modest mileage, with @metsfanod noting the strong demand for such vehicles in the market, making it an appealing auction entry.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, emphasized their commitment to quality and thoroughness in their listings. They provided detailed information about the vehicle and encouraged interested buyers to view the car in person or through video walk-arounds. Various commenters asked practical questions about the vehicle, including specifics regarding measurements and shipping costs, which contributed to an informative discussion around the car's availability and logistics.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Willbecca, who expressed skepticism about why the car had been driven so little, suggesting that something might be amiss. This concern was countered by both @1600veloce and @mfdoc, who clarified that the limited usage was due to health issues, not the car's reliability. Despite positive overall feedback, there were lingering doubts from some about the car's history and usage, reflecting a cautious approach from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and nostalgia for the Corvair being offered for auction. @CarDogThreePedals reminisced about witnessing Corvairs excellently perform in autocross events, praising the vehicle's performance despite its controversial history. @Big_DaddyRL highlighted the technological advancements of the Corvair, asserting that if produced today, it could rival modern sports cars like Porsche. Enthusiasts like @Al_Swearengen and @Jimbo9999 shared their admiration for its design and racing pedigree, while @dtjwnbarr and @CWood13 noted the dedicated community that surrounds these cars, emphasizing the support and knowledge shared among fellow Corvair enthusiasts.
Neutral: The comments also contained various neutral inquiries and remarks about the Corvair's specifications. @Quadrifoglio and @Tookie1944 asked about its weight and compliance details, while @Yenko1966 provided insight into its use, indicating it is better suited for track days and autocross rather than vintage road racing without additional modifications. @rcavictor (The Seller) responded to these queries satisfactorily, sharing information about the car's compliance, weight, and maintenance history, ensuring potential bidders have a clear understanding of what they are considering.
Negative: On the other hand, some commenters pointed out concerns regarding the vehicle's vintage racing capabilities. @Yenko1966 pointedly highlighted that the Corvair lacks a full cage necessary for competitive road racing. Meanwhile, @PullG noted that while the car may not have a logbook, compliance with SCCA rules only extends as necessary for local autocross events. Additionally, @VolvoguyKC humorously acknowledged the lingering shadow cast by Ralph Nader's critiques, insinuating that some still view the Corvair with skepticism. Overall, while the comments displayed admiration, they also pointed to certain limitations and historical baggage of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's unique aesthetic, particularly praising its stunning Riverside Gold color, the distinctive P02 turbine wheel covers, and its survivor status. @Noisyboyz found the car's color and wheel covers beautiful, and @FlyAsh69 mentioned that it closely resembles a car they own, signifying a strong emotional connection. @CarFoolLane echoed enthusiasm by describing the vehicle as giving off an "astronaut vibe" related to the era, and @JohnF1966 acknowledged the car's cool features and original condition, applauding its drive quality compared to restored vehicles.
Neutral: @GeorgeLyons (The Seller) provided detailed information about the car's history, stating that it has original paint but is showing age in some areas. He clarified that the 64th plate has no significance and reassured that the air conditioning blows cold, using original R12. Additionally, he mentioned that while some components appear to have been repainted for preservation, the integrity of the structure, including the birdcage and frame, remains intact and unwarranted damage has not been reported.
Negative: Some comments expressed concerns about potential issues or the car's presentation. @kstine98 asked if any leaks were detected in the T-tops, while @BMCPART noted a non-functioning clock, suggesting a repair might be necessary. @22truckie also speculated about the lower interest in survivor cars in auctions today, indicating a worry that the market might not value such originality as much as before. Moreover, @toking75 brought up a concern regarding the absence of factory side pipes due to heat generated by big block motors, implying that these features could have enhanced performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mr_White exclaimed in disbelief about the vehicle's incredibly low mileage of just 7,000 miles, even suggesting the possibility of time travel. @campodf echoed this sentiment, expressing amazement at the existence of an A8 TDI with fewer miles than he drives in a year. @christian_main praised the car as the best, most well-optioned D4 he has encountered, expressing enthusiasm that it should be taken on long road trips instead of being left idle. @RichFX shared a positive experience from owning a similar vehicle, highlighting its comfort and impressive fuel efficiency, suggesting it as a wonderful choice for any buyer.
Neutral: Commenters were curious about the vehicle's specifications and features. @4ringS5 raised a technical question regarding the belly pans of the vehicle, wondering if they had been removed for the photos. @Law75 inquired about the availability of a heads-up display, while @crazyfrog70 asked whether the model uses DEF fluid, to which the seller confirmed that it does. Additionally, @BMWE90Guy provided insight into the model's interesting specifications and preferences compared to competitors from the same era.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the low mileage and suitable usage of the vehicle. @bferkel expressed uncertainty about the practicality of purchasing the car, considering the effort involved in acquiring and maintaining it for such minimal driving. @Scott_S speculated humorously about the previous owner's likely profile as an older individual who only took it out for casual drives, noting how the car's high diesel prices might discourage regular use. Overall, some commenters seemed puzzled or concerned about the vehicle's underutilization.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the admiration for the vehicle's color and originality, with @timandsons particularly appreciating the car's 'ridden hard' look and overall character, suggesting that it captures the essence of a vintage Beetle. @williamglenn95 echoes this sentiment by praising the car's nice color and equipment. Additionally, @GlenK notes that the turn signal issue is an easy fix, adding a practical perspective, while @OldManVW appreciates specific features of the 1960 model, indicating a knowledgeable appreciation for its transitional style.
Neutral: Several comments express curiosity about the car's condition and restoration history. @Johnrigdon raises a question about potential modifications to the dash, while @Frogman70 suggests that the water spots might conceal paint issues, indicating a cautious optimism about the car's appearance. @1click2many shares a personal anecdote about a past Beetle experience that suggests nostalgia and fond memories, adding context to the vehicle's history without directly commenting on its current state.
Negative: There are concerns regarding the car's presentation in photos, with @JimS99 asking for clearer images of the bumpers, and @Frankieballs criticizing the washing job, implying that a more thorough detailing would have been beneficial. @bnhappy55 even jokingly offers a towel to dry the car off, underscoring a common sentiment regarding its wet appearance. Overall, while many appreciate the car, there is a consensus that better photography would enhance its appeal.
![]() |

































































