Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the Ferrari F430, particularly its gated manual transmission, which many commenters highlight as a key feature that enhances the driving experience. @70_duster, @randluxury, and @urs6e24 emphasize the model's rarity and reliability, with numerous comments anticipating that its value will continue to rise. @Havatoy and @billyblyth compliment the car's stunning aesthetics and suggest that it stands as one of the most beautiful Ferraris of the decade. The overall sentiment is one of admiration, with users expressing excitement about the car's auction and the expectations for a high bidding outcome.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @911r (The Seller), provide informative insights about the car's specifications, its maintenance history, and the auction process, creating a neutral but factual layer to the conversation. @mike_747 and @Dadster discuss the current market landscape for similar vehicles, noting sales data and auction results from other platforms, which contextualizes the F430 within the broader collector car market. Comments also indicate varying levels of familiarity with the car's production numbers and features, though without strong opinions either way, reflecting a more analytical approach to their commentary.
Negative: While the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, there are a few comments expressing skepticism or concern. For example, @mike_747 raises questions about the car's past exhaust system, indicating some uncertainty about the vehicle's specifications. @blackhorseLA mentions that newer Ferraris have become overly tech-laden, contrasting them with the analog qualities of the F430, implying a preference for the older models. Furthermore, @urs6e24 notes the unusually high number of similar vehicles on the market, suggesting a potential overcrowding that may affect bidding dynamics. However, these criticisms do not overshadow the overall positive perspectives shared by most users.
![]() |
1967 Citroen DS21 Henri Chapron Serie 2 Cabriolet Conversion by Karl’s Autowerkstatt
4602622
Lot 238429
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters are enamored with the car's stunning aesthetics and unique characteristics. @Dollycat3 describes it as "absolutely stunning" with an incredible color combination and condition. @Snaveck notes it as one of their favorite cars of all time, while @Mr_H quips that it deserves to be associated with a glamorous lifestyle. The car's design is celebrated as a masterpiece, with @Biscotte57 calling it an amazing icon that is extremely rare. Commenters like @BMac emphasize its impressive presentation and photo gallery, praising the seller's attention to detail and the overall artistry of the vehicle. Additionally, numerous comments suggest that the car would be a delightful presence on scenic drives, with @GDogg saying it would be perfect for a casual Saturday in Palm Beach.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the car’s technical aspects and historical context, with @Cavalino raising queries about the car's top frame and its aftermarket status, reflecting a desire for clarity among potential buyers. Some participants note the car's vintage charm and driving experience as being reminiscent of a different era, with @stanela expressing curiosity about the lack of EFI conversion. Others voice practical concerns, such as the missing cigarette lighter (@RalfHuck) and the absence of original manuals, which @Robert_Bourgeois and @Biscotte57 acknowledged. These comments indicate that while the vehicle is visually captivating, there are logistical details that merit attention for serious buyers.
Negative: On the downside, a few opinions express skepticism about the color and modifications, particularly the fuchsia interior. @obercom and @3Pedalonly question the choice of color, implying it detracts from the vehicle’s value, while @Cavalino criticizes the car not being a Chapron original. Additionally, @DanOlson candidly mentions a distraction caused by the missing lighter, indicating that even minor issues can be a point of contention for some collectors. @xocleahcim defends the original Chapron builds, suggesting that modern conversions might lack the charm and historical significance of the originals, hinting at a divide in preference among Citroën enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express admiration for the Lancia Aurelia B24, highlighting its beauty and rarity. Commentor @cardude76 praises it as a gorgeous and rare example of automotive excellence and appreciates the quality of workmanship. @kkherman refers to it as the most interesting offer on BaT, calling it a real dream. Others, like @mbaum and @Significant_Cars, discuss its desirability due to its engineering pedigree under Vittorio Jano and the excitement of potentially owning such a well-crafted Italian roadster, emphasizing the exceptional build quality compared to other luxury brands like Rolls Royce.
Neutral: Commentors share various insights about the car's history and features, with some discussion about the differing opinions on the choice of wheels, namely Borrani wires versus steelies. @Rick finds entertainment in the invoices starting from a certain number, while @Papamaumau appreciates the high-quality photography of the car’s underside. There are also comments about the market dynamics of rare cars, with @justpaul expressing surprise at the rapid emergence of similar models on BaT, suggesting a unique moment for collectors and enthusiasts alike.
Negative: Some negativity arises around the car's perceived value and condition. @flyingdago mentions that the silver car could use some cosmetic improvements and questions whether BaT is the best platform for such a vehicle after a previously disappointing sale. @justpaul expresses concern over driving the car in the mid-Atlantic, while @Sliding_Pillar points out discrepancies in the seller's comments regarding the vehicle being a 'matching numbers' car, speculating about its actual history. Others mention the 'Andrea Doria myth' which detracts from the car's allure, emphasizing concerns over the authenticity of some claims surrounding the model.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Overall, many comments reflect a strong appreciation for the 1965 Chevelle Malibu, particularly regarding its aesthetic appeal and performance capabilities. Commenters like @boaboyoz and @alexg182 enthusiastically highlight the striking Mist Blue color and the increasing value of the 64/65 models. The engine, an L79, is praised as one of the best small-block engines of the 60s, with @TedLitvin stating its significance in automotive history. The seller, @fcort7, successfully conveys confidence in the car's authenticity and condition, noting its presence in the L79 registry and offering assurance through well-documented history. Enthusiasts such as @hairyolds and @Intimidator04 commend the vehicle's restoration quality and potential desirability, signaling a vibrant market for such classic cars.
Neutral: Several commenters also seek clarification on specific details about the vehicle. For instance, @Chipper56 and @RickeyD ask about the availability of documentation confirming the car's L79 status and the verification of the engine stamp, reflecting a keen interest in the authenticity of the vehicle. The seller provides information and reassurances regarding the car's paperwork without guarantees on the elusive build sheet, indicating that it was previously available but misplaced. Comments from users like @tim49 and @gauldingr request additional verification through videos and functionality confirmations, underscoring a need for visual evidence to accompany the car's claims by the seller.
Negative: Conversely, some users point out inconsistencies and potential issues regarding the car's restoration and details. @source1audio and @Rich-Tripower mention concerns over the engine stamp's presentation, suggesting it appears careless or ‘sloppy’, which could affect its perceived authenticity. @Bhallchevelle and others highlight missing details, such as the factory tachometer, needing corrections on the rear cove color, and functional discrepancies with various gauges. The seller acknowledges that while the car is not represented as a perfect factory example, it remains a high-quality driver, aiming to attract bidders looking for a classic that combines drivability with classic appeal without the pressures of full restoration accuracy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the unique features and history of the 1997 Porsche 911 GT2 R. @Steve911GT3 found the listing interesting, while @septicore appreciated the innovative potential of such vehicles on the BaT platform. Others, like @Magdaddy and @HPLM, shared their dreams and experiences with similar models, indicating a strong emotional connection to this specific car. @MMK-CARS called it a 'true masterpiece of engineering and style,' highlighting its desirability among enthusiasts. The seller, @BlueChipCar, welcomed community engagement and transparency about the auction process, fostering a positive atmosphere for potential bidders.
Neutral: Several comments contained technical questions and observations about the vehicle's history and specifications. @JD84 raised a query about the authenticity of the chassis number after a replacement shell, suggesting that different interpretations surround the vehicle's identity. @40CylindersGruppe shared their personal experiences with similar models, while @vaultofscottsdale and @NWian discussed the potential costs involved in restoring the car to track-ready condition, providing insights into the financial implications of such projects. The seller actively engaged with questions, providing clarity on details such as the front fender materials and confirming the car's original production history as documented by RM Sotheby's.
Negative: Concerns emerged about the car's authenticity and restoration, with users like @WOLFVISIONAIRE and @rennsemmel challenging the clarity of its history and the discrepancies regarding VINs. @PhilGilsdorf noted the existence of potential confusion regarding production numbers for replacement vs. original shells, suggesting that the information about the car might not be entirely reliable. @MoreGAS and @vaultofscottsdale expressed skepticism about the engine's condition and history, questioning whether it is genuine and capable of being restored to its former racing glory. Overall, the need for thorough documentation and transparency was emphasized to alleviate doubts about the vehicle's provenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the unique features of the vehicle, particularly highlighting the visual appeal of its design. @topshoe praised the wheels as fantastic, describing them as classic 80's fabulousness. @DougP also shared their love for the Centras, enjoying their historical significance. Furthermore, @Christopher_Kohler highlighted the impressive promotional video showcasing the car's construction, while @Bongiovi found the overall uniqueness of the E24 to be appealing. @M5280RCR appreciated the vehicle's style and expressed a desire to add it to their collection, emphasizing that it should attract an interested buyer.
Neutral: Some comments reflected a mixture of intrigue and skepticism regarding the modifications made to the vehicle. @craina noted it had interesting Saab 900 vibes from certain angles, while @blueChipCar (The Seller) assured potential buyers that they are available for questions and anticipate that the car is one of a kind. @brannman described it as an 'amazing engineering experiment' but also remarked that the special modifications had been rendered non-functional, leading to an interesting aesthetic without the original dynamics. Lastly, @silentstang pointed out that regardless of its history, the car no longer retains the capabilities it was initially designed for, prompting questions about its current state.
Negative: However, numerous commenters were critical of certain aspects, particularly the vehicle's modifications and specific design choices. @BBK dismissed the unusual modifications not being favorable, while @702e30girl humorously lamented the choice of wheels, deeming them a crime. @maskedman echoed this sentiment, stating that while they owned a similar set of wheels, they felt they did not age well. There was also a concern from @Universal, who questioned whether the essential characteristics of the vehicle had been compromised, suggesting that it was little more than a glorified 635CSi. Additionally, @Jimmy_P critiqued the aesthetic choice of modifications, suggesting they were unnecessary and poorly executed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and appeal. @Atom0096 calls it the 'home of the NSX best results,' and @Sjo appreciates the rarity of having an original owner. Several users, including @Darkvoltage and @UglyFast, comment on the car's aesthetic appeal, with Darkvoltage stating it’s the best-looking 90's Japanese car. @Carguy48 and others praise the car’s reliability and maintenance, and @Driver2300 (The Seller) provides reassurance about the vehicle’s condition, mentioning that the paint is original and that he and his son maintain it.
Neutral: Comments also reflect a desire for further information and engagement about the vehicle’s background and condition. @Hlee96 asks about the specific color, while @_dwonder inquires about service records and timing belt maintenance. Interested parties like @jasonlewis13 and @Duojet express eagerness to see the car in person or gather details on specific features, like the stereo system. @Carguy48 also poses questions regarding the maintenance history and the state of various components, demonstrating a proactive interest in understanding the car’s upkeep.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding the car's overall condition and maintenance history. @tcdavis66 questions the wear on the rear tires and posits that internal wear may be aggressive. @Carguy48 expresses skepticism about the maintenance practices, questioning the oil change frequency and other system conditions. Other commenters, including @Duojet and @mhawkeONT, bring up potential blemishes and previous maintenance habits, raising doubts about the absence of detailed records and verification of component longevity. This critical feedback indicates that while many enthusiasts adore the vehicle, there are practical concerns regarding its history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Todd_Z. loves the Hanson bumper, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @boaboyoz describes the vehicle as a charming Chandler Bronco, calling it a delightful example and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) presents the Bronco as a true head-turner, acknowledging that it runs and drives great with smooth cruising capabilities at 70 mph. The seller emphasizes the vehicle's solid, reliable condition, stating it is well cared for and ready for enjoyable drives.
Neutral: @Bigvinny inquires about where he can view the vehicle, indicating he might be interested in purchasing it. He later confirms that he found the seller's contact information, demonstrating a communicative approach towards arranging a viewing. @carstruck compliments the truck’s appearance, noting its stance, color, graphics, and overall job done on the vehicle without expressing a strong opinion either way about its performance or condition.
Negative: @weismanfamily raises a question about the functionality of the AC and heat in the vehicle, suggesting that there might be concerns regarding its comfort features. In response, @Molae65 informs @weismanfamily that the Bronco does not have AC and hints that the lack of mention about heat could also be a factor of concern. Overall, the questions raised imply uncertainty about the vehicle's climate control systems, which could deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @greenerdays11 (The Seller) introduces the 2014 Bentley Continental GT Speed positively, calling it a 'beautiful' vehicle. @PAEnglish11 appreciates the color combination, highlighting the aesthetics of the car.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific details regarding the car's service and location. @Maeter initially asks about the service history, to which @greenerdays11 responds by stating that the vehicle has been regularly serviced according to CarFax. @Gouldpackard1937 and @ManyTrailers also seek further information about the car's location and request a driving video, respectively.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the vehicle's condition, with @ManyTrailers noting a 'squeak' heard during driving and questioning the age of the tires. @steelerchamps asks about check engine codes, hinting towards potential mechanical issues. @Maeter expresses discontent regarding the absence of physical service records, indicating a desire for more transparency about the vehicle's maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ColoTom shares fond memories of owning Austin Healeys, reminiscing about the fun and companionship they bring to their drivers. @TomInTampa expresses excitement over the unique color combination of the vehicle, while @eldegee recalls the joy of restoring an Austin Healey with their father and cherishes the wonderful memories linked to the car. @Asknotwantnot describes the vehicle as a great-looking cruiser, and @sliproc appreciates the rarity of the color Florida Green, highlighting that it will stand out at car shows. @healeyhelper commends the installation of under-frame harness clips, noting that the color is eye-catching and a departure from the original, making it a showstopper.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @cjayadams (The Seller), acknowledge the request for driving and cold start videos, which will be produced as soon as weather permits. @howdoyoufitinthat mentions the unique thermo choke setup used during a short production period and shares personal experience with its functionality. There are discussions on the car's history and mechanics, particularly concerning the original rear crank seal and the expected oil leaks common with British automobiles, with @rx_jagetc adding technical insights on seal effectiveness and potential sources of leaks.
Negative: @Retiredbiker raises concerns about reported fluid leaks, questioning whether maintenance has been conducted since the last invoice. @healeyhelper and @rx_jagetc discuss the commonality of oil drips in British cars, detailing various potential leak sources and challenging common assumptions about the vehicle's engineering. These concerns suggest that while the vehicle has charm, it also has its quirks and maintenance challenges typical for classics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and quality of build. @RWB_AZ remarked on the quick escalation of interest in the truck, while @boaboyoz complimented its lovely light blue color and tremendous build. The seller, @Sportscarclassics, provided detailed descriptions of the vehicle's condition, including its rust-free body and the high-quality restoration featuring a base coat and clear coat system, adding to its appeal. @Onlyfords shared their excitement, especially due to the truck's regular cab configuration.
Neutral: Comments from users like @carstruck reflected a mix of interest and caution, with observations on the condition of the vehicle's paintwork and the potential need for further inspections. @jxb mentioned the truck's suitability as a frame-up project rig, while also acknowledging the blue smoke on shifting, which suggests potential mechanical issues. The seller's comments were informative, addressing the restoration processes taken and inviting further inquiries from potential buyers.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's overall condition. @carstruck pointed out visible signs of paintover work, implying that underlying metal issues may exist. @pbf777 questioned certain upgrades and modifications made to the interior and undercarriage, suggesting that they deviated from original specifications, which could affect the truck's authenticity and value. @obturate lamented that the truck might only attract a casual audience rather than serious collectors, emphasizing its lesser appeal to enthusiasts.
![]() |
Original-Owner 2017 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Coupe 3LZ Z07 7-Speed
1G1YT2D64H5606218
Lot 238786
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the vehicle's unique specs and aesthetic appeal, with many users praising its rare features. @ap2_911 and @Plywood222222 noted the rarity and beauty of the car, while @Mstanfill described it as a "sure winner." @R32_23 expressed enthusiasm, exclaiming that it's beautiful. Both @smokinscooters and @Stads69 appreciated the twilight blue interior paired with the black exterior, showcasing personal taste in design. @lunchbocks2002 pointed out that the Z06 with such specifications is quite rare, enhancing its uniqueness.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about specific details of the vehicle, indicating an interest in its condition and history. @KingKhizer23 inquired about the color of additional rims, while @Tribe78 brought up concerns about visible spider cracking and requested clarification on potential damage. @mmakam2 questioned the paint's condition concerning the car's mileage, indicating that some observers see roughness, while others argue it's pristine aside from minor issues noted by @57ChevyJohn (The Seller). @CaptJack22 and others sought more information about the car's features and maintenance history, showing that potential buyers are keen on understanding the vehicle thoroughly.
Negative: Among the comments, there were critical observations about the vehicle's paint condition and maintenance history. @mmakam2 expressed concerns that the clear coat appeared rough and may have resulted from automatic car washes. Additionally, @F92S63M8 suggested that detailing before photos was necessary, indicating the current presentation may not be optimal. @cole2rich's inquiry about repair quotes for the front paint issue further supports the notion that some aspects of the car may need addressing. Overall, while the majority appreciated the car's unique characteristics, there were significant concerns regarding the condition that could affect perceived value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2013 Mercedes-Benz S550 4MATIC has garnered praise for its appealing color, with @Chatham stating it is 'by far — the best color on a modern S Class.' Additionally, @rockyloretta shares their positive experiences with the model, highlighting it as a 'great road machine' over years of reliable cruising, exemplifying the vehicle's comfort and performance. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, emphasizes the vehicle's stunning condition, stating it rides amazing without any issues, implying a high standard for this offering.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle's mileage have raised some concerns, with @Fairmont663336 asking for clarification and @Bibs57 pointing out discrepancies in mileage reports. While @Collectibleclassics addresses these concerns by suggesting that varying mileage reports can often result from errors in car history reporting systems, the conversation around this point remains ongoing, indicating some uncertainty among potential buyers. Additionally, @Dave18SF raises important questions regarding the inspection status of the car's suspension system, underscoring the need for thorough evaluations given the vehicle's age.
Negative: Concerns have been expressed about the car's mileage accuracy. @Bibs57 cites multiple mileage reports that suggest inconsistencies, which @Collectibleclassics tries to dismiss but does not fully resolve the doubt. There are also worries about the vehicle's suspension components, as @C5Z inquires about the possibility of oil or coolant leaks, and the lack of detailed maintenance information from the seller raises alarms among some commenters. The fear of potential mileage tampering also appears in comments, with @Jimmonte dismissing such claims but acknowledging the existence of skepticism regarding the vehicle's reported mileage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Stagehand expresses admiration for the vehicle's beauty, calling it "purdy," while @bluesrocker mentions the car's status as a likely well-maintained Japanese wagon. @Luz_do_sol appreciates the car's authenticity as a pre-merger AMG wagon, highlighting its high specifications and upgrades that enhance both performance and style. @Mkent24 encapsulates the overall sentiment by stating that the vehicle "just oozes cool," reflecting a positive aesthetic perception among the commentators.
Neutral: @JasperStokes brings up interest as a new member of the bidding community, reflecting on the car's appeal despite being new to the platform. @KevinH provides insights into the vehicle's headlights, noting differences that potential buyers should consider, indicating a mixed but cautious reception among prospective bidders. @BlueChipCar (The Seller) conveys additional information to help bidders feel confident about their purchase, engaging with the community about details of the vehicle's condition and auction history.
Negative: @kzcan shares skepticism regarding the vehicle's pricing in the current economy, suggesting that expecting bids over $51k is unrealistic. @notlikelytowin4 expresses dissatisfaction with the dealer fee, stating they will not participate in the auction as a result. @B613P raises concerns about possible non-original details of the car's exterior components, questioning authenticity and design choices made by past owners, which could deter serious buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments praise the vehicle, highlighting its thorough and professional presentation. @allabouteuro, who has considerable experience with Porsches, expresses admiration for this particular 1995 Porsche 993, noting its pristine condition, comprehensive service history, and the value of extra parts that come with it. @BobSoCal agrees, remarking on the extensive maintenance and upgrades that have preserved the car exceptionally well. @HamiltonSeth also chimes in positively about the unique features of this model, noting its desirable 'Basket Handle' rear spoiler, enhancing its appeal among Porsche enthusiasts.
Neutral: In the midst of the positive feedback, there are inquiries and clarifications from various users about the car's condition and history. @Jason1227 raises questions regarding the odometer history, suggesting that its consistency may be reassuring for potential buyers. @ryneodonnell asks for confirmation about any possible paintwork done on the vehicle while also expressing interest in its original headlights. The seller, @Worldclassmotorcars, engages with these comments, providing details about the car’s service history and addressing specific concerns regarding maintenance and parts.
Negative: A few comments express concerns and seek clarification about the vehicle. @6thinline9 notes a missing replacement of a known wiring harness issue typically associated with the 1995 model, highlighting a potential oversight. Additionally, @SactoKeith's comments were flagged as non-constructive, indicating some dissatisfaction in the discussion. @BobSoCal also questions the necessity of past engine work and asks for more detailed visual evidence of repairs, suggesting a need for transparency that some might find lacking.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as absolutely gorgeous, emphasizing its desirable Silver Gray Metallic color and beautiful interior. @whipcity76 appreciates the classic livery Pagoda, noting its inviting nature and overall condition, suggesting it has been well cared for. @wedrive endorses the car as spectacular and encourages potential bidders to bid with confidence, while also highlighting the owner's commitment to maintaining the vehicle.
Neutral: @milburndrysdale1 asks about the horsepower, which @wedrive answers, indicating it has 180hp. @procrastibader raises questions about the absence of a body number on the hood and the availability of the original steering wheel, to which @originalblackplate (The Seller) confirms that the hood was likely replaced and the original steering wheel was not included. The seller also mentions that the car has been loved over the years despite lacking detailed history information from previous owners.
Negative: @Flashpix expresses disappointment over the non-functioning clock, stating this is a dealbreaker for them. Another comment from @whipcity76 responds to @Flashpix's concern by downplaying the issue of the clock, suggesting it could easily be repaired at a reasonable cost. However, @whipcity76 is surprised by the low interest in the car, noting that engine swaps were not uncommon in this era due to various circumstances that can arise, but still maintains that the Pagodas deliver unique driving experiences.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commentators expressed their admiration for the vehicle's color, specifically the striking Phoenix Yellow, with @Speedy4 and @70_duster both proclaiming their love for it. @corkscrewlife complimented its unique appearance, noting the high mileage as a sign of it being well-enjoyed. Furthermore, @BlueBimmers praised the seller for continuing the car's rehabilitation, while @howS (The Seller) emphasized the car's joy to drive, capturing a nostalgic, pure driving experience without modern electronic distractions.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification about the vehicle's modifications and history. @TanDan inquired about specifics regarding engine compression after a rebuild, while @Westphalracing asked why only three connecting rods were replaced during a recent service. @MyWifeWillBeMad humorously suggested the car's color resembled 'bug poop yellow,' highlighting a contrasting opinion. Additionally, @dnzg777 brought up specific features such as tire details and paint conditions, indicating a keen interest in the car's overall condition.
Negative: On the downside, not all feedback was positive; @MyWifeWillBeMad's comment about the car's color received a negative reaction. @BlueBimmers pointed out some inaccuracies in the seller's listing regarding technical details, such as the absence of TPMS and the inconsistency with the luxury trim terminology. There were also critical observations about the front bumper's alignment and minor trim issues, suggesting that while the car is cherished, it may have areas requiring attention.
![]() |
27k-Mile 2012 Ford E-450 Super Duty 6.8L V10 Dually 15-Passenger Bus w/Wheelchair Lift
1FDFE4FS2CDA95892
Lot 238795
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: @CarsGlobal addressed various inquiries about the vehicle effectively. @knightscape7 appreciated the extended walkaround and test drive, finding it very helpful. Additionally, @TristanvG confirmed that the vehicle was previously used to transport senior citizens and that both front and rear A/C systems were functioning properly, which showcased the vehicle's readiness for use.
Neutral: @fordforlife inquired about the overall dimensions of the vehicle, specifically the back compartment's width and overall length, and @Mjcaskey01 sought clarification on the handicap door's functionality and delivery costs to Sioux City, IA, indicating interest in the vehicle's features and logistics without expressing a strong preference for the purchase.
Negative: @knightscape7 raised concerns about noticeable rattling during the test drive and speculated its source as potentially being related to the door or opening mechanism. @CarsGlobal explained that the noise originated from the handicap lift, which is generally noisy, and although they offered solutions like securing it with bungee cords, the initial concern about the rattling remained unresolved.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mellowd719 recalls fond memories of 'Big Red', a nickname given by his family to a similar vehicle, describing the sentimental value attached to it. @ArtistFox comments on the beauty of the vehicle, noting it looks well taken care of and in mint condition. Additionally, @BcTank highlights the truck's impressive capabilities, noting it towed well and was powerful enough to handle heavy loads, while also appreciating the aesthetic and practical aspects of purchasing in the past.
Neutral: @Osramicus expresses curiosity about previous modifications, specifically the gear changes, and sees potential in the truck's performance. @DavidsFab7 (The Seller) clarifies ownership details and addresses questions about the vehicle's maintenance and modifications. He provides insights into the vehicle's towing capabilities, fuel efficiency, and the reasons behind the gear swap, highlighting that it was intended to enhance towing performance.
Negative: @artreality humorously compares the vehicle to an oversized Aztek, commenting on its appearance, which he finds unattractive. @tildon questions the MPG sticker absence, hinting at dissatisfaction regarding fuel economy information. Additionally, @seanfrontz raises concerns about alignment issues on the hood after accidents, asking about the history of the vehicle's damage and repairs, which @DavidsFab7 (The Seller) eventually addresses with a detailed explanation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BostonCarGuy appreciates the unique Aintree Green color combination and believes the auction setup could reveal the true market value of the vehicle, highlighting the Land Rover's quality. @SuperCarsLLC, the seller, expresses excitement about the vehicle's color and states it has a beautiful finish with emerald flakes visible in sunlight. They also note the luxurious specifications of the L405, which include a powerful engine and a range of high-end features such as a panoramic roof and advanced climate control that enhance its appeal as a sporty yet comfortable SUV.
Neutral: @Xingke160 and @Volvodr raise concerns about the service records related to critical components like the timing and cooling systems, with @Volvodr suggesting that buyers should not assume these have been serviced unless verified by the seller. @mgospo22 mentions that the seller's previous lack of engagement may have led to fewer bids, however, acknowledges the standout color combination of the vehicle and encourages the seller to increase their promotional efforts, referencing another seller's effective presentation.
Negative: @WAGONBOYTD notes that the history shows only two oil changes in 100,000 miles, implying that the car may soon need a timing component replacement which could be costly. The seller, @SuperCarsLLC, acknowledges the presence of minor defects on the vehicle such as scratches on the bumper, undercarriage rust, and a stain on the rear seat, indicating that despite the vehicle's luxurious attributes, there are noticeable issues that potential bidders should consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the car's condition and aesthetics. @Bob_MX5 called it a 'decent daily driver quality' while @larrib praised the 1994 model for its features, noting it had a more powerful engine and easier modifications. @Kidkjellin highlighted its rare ABS feature and commented on the car's overall appearance, stating it was 'so well taken care of.' There's also recognition of the BBS wheels, which are deemed a significant plus, with several users agreeing that the wheels enhance the car's appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @seagatefrank, actively engaged with commenters, offering insights into the vehicle's maintenance history and features. He confirmed that the timing belt and water pump were replaced recently, although he was unable to provide comprehensive service records due to missing documentation. He also assured potential bidders that the car was in stock condition. There have been inquiries about minor issues, like the cassette player and a crack in the bumper, which @seagatefrank addressed with transparency, stating he would provide updates and visuals as needed.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, there were concerns raised about certain issues. @foureyeddriver noted the need for a radiator replacement, which @Bob_MX5 echoed, stressing the risks associated with the aging part. @NeedAFleet asked about the potential for any hidden damages and the condition of the tires. @rma97 sought clarification about the repainting of the rear bumper, indicating a potential concern over the car's integrity. While some found the urgency to replace the radiator amusing, others felt it was a necessary precaution for the next owner.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters like @doggear have praised the bike, noting the advantage of its factory low suspension for improved handling on roads, expressed through their own experience with a similar model. Seller @Smitty211 has also highlighted the bike’s features, detailing that the lowered suspension makes it accessible for riders with shorter inseams, while also providing dynamic electronic spring adjustments for varied terrains. Furthermore, @Bobsbikes echoed this sentiment, confirming the benefits and engineering quality of the lowered suspension, making it a great motorcycle.
Neutral: Comments from various users reveal several inquiries about the bike's specifications and maintenance history, such as @tennengr's question regarding the height adjustment options and @MDMason's request for clarification on recent repairs despite low mileage. @XRDV8 noted that the bike's brake calipers were likely replaced under a warranty program, indicating potential common issues for that model. The seller, @Smitty211, responded promptly to comments regarding the gas and sound quality from the bike videos, assuring users that appropriate maintenance steps were taken.
Negative: Some concerns were raised, notably by @LaneFM, who pointed out the noise levels in the seller's video. The seller responded by attributing the sound issue to wind noise from their GoPro recording. Additionally, @Namtrop66 expressed worry about the age of the gas in the tank, prompting @Smitty211 to clarify that old gas was siphoned out and fresh fuel added. @Rommel also questioned the current seat height, suggesting that there may be inconsistencies in what potential buyers could expect from the bike.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, sharing a nostalgic connection with the white Challenger model, with @MDW66 specifically highlighting its association with the film character Kowalski. There is an appreciation for the detailed handling information provided by @ClassicalGasMotors, indicating that careful driving practices were observed during the car's break-in period. Additionally, the presence of factory tags and stickers throughout the car, as noted by @ClassicalGasMotors, contributes positively to the vehicle's authenticity and condition.
Neutral: @ClassicalGasMotors (The Seller) takes a proactive approach by inviting questions from potential buyers, demonstrating transparency about the vehicle's history and modifications. They explain that details regarding the car's maintenance, computer module replacements, and title reissuing will be clarified after further investigation. This indicates a willingness to provide accurate information, which can reassure potential buyers about the vehicle's background and current state.
Negative: There are concerns raised by @anasq-38 regarding the vehicle's maintenance record, particularly asking whether warranty work was performed and questioning the nature of parts replacements. Additionally, worries about the vehicle's title status due to duplicate titles issued in 2020 and 2021 reflect some unease among potential buyers regarding legalities. Commentary from @badcad suggests a perception that there are too many similar vehicles available, potentially indicating a saturated market and a lack of exclusivity which could affect the car's appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express a deep admiration for the beauty and iconic status of the vehicle, often highlighting its stunning design and historical significance. @SnoDawg characterizes the car as 'breathtaking' and deserving of appreciation for its aesthetics, rather than focusing solely on imperfections. @GDogg and @Bellissimo also share their love for the car, emphasizing its charm and noting that it has been well-loved and used over the years. Enthusiasts like @gullwing71 and @4CamGT appreciate the car's unique presence and the joy it brings to driving experiences.
Neutral: Several comments provide a balanced perspective on the vehicle, acknowledging its issues while also recognizing its potential and appeal. @dino70089 discusses the importance of correctness in judging classic cars but also admits that enjoyment can come from driving a car that may not be perfect. @mbheritage (The Seller) offers insights regarding the car's history and condition, including noting necessary maintenance and encouraging potential buyers to inspect the car thoroughly. Some users discuss the practicality of a vehicle that is not concours perfect, suggesting it could be driven without fear of depreciation.
Negative: On the other hand, there are critical comments regarding the condition and modifications of the vehicle. @dino70089 lists several inaccuracies and issues that detract from its originality, while @BlackhorseLA provocatively states that anything less than perfect should be 'sent straight to the crusher.' Others, including @tcdavis66 and @Daniel1962, inquire about functional components and express surprise at the decision to sell a car of such storied significance. Commenters raise concerns about the car's market price and necessary repairs, contributing to a mixed evaluation of its overall value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and riding experience. @mo8ius appreciates the low mileage of the bike, while @traveler_1701 recalls its sporty nature and tasteful modifications. @Ebozeman calls it a great looking bike, indicating that it deserves more love, and @LotusChappyS1 notes the meticulous care it has received from its owner. @spacetiger describes it as a wonderful ride with a personal connection, and @Rod_Panhard likens it to the Miata of motorcycles for its handling and reliability.
Neutral: The seller, @Autogalerie-us, has been actively engaging with potential buyers, providing necessary information about the bike's condition and modifications. They emphasize their experience with over 200 completed auctions and express excitement about the auction, showing transparency about their role in facilitating the sale. @SD1993 reveals their ownership of the bike and answers questions about modifications, while also sharing their emotional connection to the bike and why they're parting with it.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the bike's condition, specifically regarding two prominent dings in the tank, as mentioned by @daves79x. @buttesilverbow notes that the tank's damage made them hesitant to bid. @mcnut suggests that a dent repair could improve its appearance, and there are inquiries about the bike's tank and carburetor setup from various users, such as @ziggy105 and @misterco. This indicates that while the bike is generally celebrated, potential buyers are cautious about specific imperfections.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DriveResults loves the vehicle and appreciates its color combination, mentioning that their X-Type VDP has the same aesthetic, suggesting a shared admiration for the model. @Micahs (The Seller) emphasizes the quality of the car, noting it has low mileage, was garage kept, and has undergone maintenance like a headliner replacement and new struts. Additionally, @RWD-FTW agrees on the beauty of the later XJ models, likening them to high-end brands with their luxurious updates.
Neutral: @Eliotb raises questions about the car's accident history, expressing interest in additional details regarding paint readings and interior features, indicating a keen perspective on transparency. Another comment by @12Temp reflects this cautious approach, asking for more detailed pictures and information on potential odors or maintenance issues, reflecting a patient inquiry process for clarity. @Micahs (The Seller) responds to inquiries with specific technical details and observations but acknowledges the limitations of his knowledge regarding past repairs or maintenance history.
Negative: In contrast, @cc5666 expresses concern over the car's condition, specifically referencing potential issues with scuff marks and damaged plastic components, which @Micahs (The Seller) explains as minor and non-structural. @Ford1973 shares skepticism about signs of prior damage from improper jacking, while @12Temp reiterates the need for clarity concerning the paint's texture and reflects frustrations over less-than-useful photographs due to reflections, highlighting a persistent concern about transparency in the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle, praising its original condition and the effort taken by the seller @TANINJDM to restore it. @Manny from @TampaCruisers expresses appreciation for the vehicle's color, while @CRUSH shares a sentiment of gratitude for saving it, mentioning that many 80 series owners share similar feelings about their vehicles' histories. The restoration process, as shown in videos shared by @TANINJDM, has garnered positive feedback for its transparency and thoroughness, with @Espanolie also appreciating the seller's openness. Overall, there is an air of excitement in the community about the vehicle's restoration and its chance for a loving new owner.
Neutral: A mix of practical inquiries and reflections on the vehicle's condition is present. @Sweli asks specific questions about the restoration, including details on underbody treatments and performance updates like the power steering fix. Other commenters, such as @WifeSaidNoMoreCars and @TANINJDM, reference previous ownership experiences and the vehicle's history, sharing their journeys with it. The conversation reflects a community interested not only in the vehicle's aesthetics but also in its mechanical integrity and backstory. @HeavyTank77 contributes a perspective on the neglect many vehicles face, indicating that such stories are common in the vehicle culture today.
Negative: Some comments convey sadness about the vehicle's earlier condition, particularly @WifeSaidNoMoreCars, who laments its previous neglect after being sold. They express heartbreak over the deterioration experienced during previous ownerships, which struck a chord with fellow enthusiasts. @Sweli questions the decision-making of past owners, wondering why a valuable vehicle ended up neglected and auctioned off, suggesting some owners might have the means to maintain it yet chose to abandon it. The tone implies disappointment for the vehicle's rough past and a hope that it will find a more caring owner this time.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Malig8tor commented on how great the truck looks and expressed excitement about seeing it with a modern engine, indicating a strong interest in bidding. @User821 (The Seller) shared that the truck has been enjoyable to own, boasting about its performance and sound, which has drawn attention. User821 also mentioned that the engine was professionally tuned after installation, enhancing its reliability and power, making it a fun vehicle for long drives.
Neutral: @Todd_Z. noted that the LS swap in this generation of truck is a first for him and seemed curious about its performance. @User821 (The Seller) provided clarifications about the engine's history and performance, stating the engine had fewer miles upon installation and that it has been well-maintained. @User821 also addressed questions about the absence of the front driveshaft, explaining that it was removed for urban driving, but can be reinstalled if needed.
Negative: @Ford77 criticized the motor choice for devaluing the vehicle, suggesting it was a poor decision. @Tituswolf351 questioned the logic behind a 135k mile LS swap while suggesting it might be better suited for hunting or farming due to its diminished resale value. @JMotan and @78fordf150 raised concerns regarding the missing front driveshaft and whether essential components were rebuilt during the swap, implying doubt about the truck's overall viability in off-road conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hi_Fi_Guy praises the owner, Tom, emphasizing his meticulous care and maintenance of the vehicle due to his background as a pilot. He assures potential buyers that Tom has maintained the motorcycle to a high standard without cutting corners, which inspires confidence in the purchase. Furthermore, @casciomotors (The Seller) echoes this sentiment by mentioning Tom's dedication to the bike, highlighting the detailed service record and his commitment over 29 years of ownership, indicating that the motorcycle has not just been maintained but cherished.
Neutral: Various comments reflect a general curiosity about the motorcycle's engine and mechanical condition. @Hotrod59 inquires about engine modifications, while @Andy_61 asks specific questions about the camshaft bearing and the drive belt replacement. The seller responds promptly, clarifying that the only internal work done involved replacing lifters around ten years ago, and they confirm that the drive belt was recently replaced with minimal miles on it. The seller reassures prospective buyers by noting the absence of accidents in the CarFax history and promising a video demonstration of the bike in full working order.
Negative: While there are generally positive sentiments surrounding the motorcycle's condition, @Andy_61 raises concerns about potential issues such as the common camshaft bearing problem associated with EVO engines. The seller acknowledges these concerns but indicates the camshaft bearing has not been replaced. The lack of concrete records from the first owner regarding any modification raises some uncertainties about the bike's complete mechanical history, leaving some questions unanswered for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its appeal as a 'sweet ride' and a 'beautiful original California 4Runner.' Enthusiasts like @turkey56 and @Dollycat3 praised its aesthetic and original features. @84FLH showed keen interest in the model, requesting a longer driving video to see its performance, and @Forrest27 hoped to purchase the vehicle at a reasonable price. @DamonEmily, the seller, engaged positively with potential buyers and assured them of the vehicle's good condition, supporting their claims with additional driving footage.
Neutral: Some comments reflected practical concerns about the vehicle's history and condition. @Ptrem questioned its past regarding being reported stolen, to which @DamonEmily clarified that it was never stolen but towed for parking violations. @carstruck noted that while the vehicle might not be as clean underneath compared to top-tier California models, the selling price could still be impressive. Additionally, @Altered4 asked about the 4Runner's reliability for a long trip, and @latruckman inquired about service history, demonstrating a mix of interest and caution among potential buyers.
Negative: Skepticism was evident in some comments, particularly from @Ptrem and @Forrest27, who raised concerns about the vehicle’s past and overall cleanliness. @Forrest27 also noted the potential worries about the car's interior condition, questioning whether the carpet was dirty or simply its actual color. Additionally, @carstruck's comment hinted at the possibility that the vehicle might not meet the high standards of some potential buyers, suggesting that it might fall short compared to other similar models.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ShaneS mentioned that the car is good-looking, while @whodat praised its stance and overall presentation, expressing a love for the aesthetic. @jacobhorn shared that after seeing the car in person, they were impressed with how well the black paint had come back post-correction, indicating confidence that the winning bidder would be pleased with this unique hot rod. Additional commenters like @rcannon911 also noted its great looks, adding that they would sell their own car for the chance to own this one, while @Audi5k remarked on the adventurous spirit of the car's cross-country trip, contributing to its allure.
Neutral: The seller, @shopclubsautogroup, provided details about the vehicle's history, including that it was previously owned by a prominent architect and how it has been treated since being retrieved from storage. They clarified that while the car starts and runs, it could use some fine-tuning post-carburetor rebuild. Multiple commenters have inquired about engine details and maintenance history, with @Caymanorcarrera showing curiosity about the car's market values and resistance to change from a purist perspective. Furthermore, @badmotorfinger and @70_duster both demonstrated enthusiasm for various car features, such as the Becker Mexico stereo and the roof rack.
Negative: Concerns were raised by various commenters regarding the absence of service records and maintenance history, which @Caymanorcarrera pointed out. @matthepcat noted potential issues such as misfires or vacuum leaks, implying that the car may not have been tuned correctly during the rebuild process. Additionally, @SpeedRx00 expressed uncertainty about the structural integrity of the front deck lid and the condition of the car's rear seat setup, while @bmontalban pressed for insights on compression tests and asked about the car's sitting duration before being revived. This piqued concern about the vehicle's reliability and serviceability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1975 Honda CB550 Four presented by @59caddyman seems to be well-regarded among commenters. @Alaskastang described it as a beautiful motorcycle, noting that his own bike had similar corrosion issues that were likely due to storage conditions. @ginpunk echoed this sentiment, highlighting that the engine case discoloration is common, easily fixed, and that the motorcycle looks great overall. @59caddyman provides thorough information about the bike's condition, emphasizing that it has 11,900 miles, was stored properly, and came with a fresh battery and gas, allowing it to run great right from the start.
Neutral: @59caddyman addresses concerns raised by @DaveD regarding heavy corrosion visible in the photos and the bike's carburetors. He explained that what appears to be corrosion is likely oxidation or residue from previous handling. He confirmed the carbs haven't been rebuilt but are in good working order without requiring significant adjustments. Additionally, he uploaded videos of the cold start, idle, and running to provide potential buyers with more insight. It was also highlighted that the bike has an original appearance, with the Flake Sunrise Orange paint intact and witness marks still visible on some bolts.
Negative: Concerns about the mechanical condition of the motorcycle were raised by commenters like @SchwarzHorse, who speculated that there might be a loose cam chain or valve-train clatter based on the sounds in the video. @59caddyman admitted that he couldn't confirm specific details about the cam chain tension or valve clearances, stating that while his knowledgeable friend inspected the bike, they didn't perform a thorough check for these issues. This uncertainty may cause some apprehension for potential buyers who seek detailed assurances about mechanical integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @porkpiehat praised the vehicle's 50's GP racer front clip, likening it to Maserati and Vanwall designs, and wished good luck with the auction. @Richard17 enjoyed the driving video, noting the car's impressive acceleration. @dcpropulsion provided a detailed evaluation, highlighting the quality of the build components, including original Jaguar brake components and a seemingly low mileage rebuilt engine, and expressed excitement over its performance capabilities. @verden humorously mentioned the niche comfort the driver seat offers, seeing it as a ride fit for a 'madman.' @m2711c remarked that the car looks like a lot of fun, despite the geographical distance from them.
Neutral: @aleccartio, the seller, welcomed bidders and emphasized the cool factor of the vehicle, stating it runs and drives with positive comments about its lightweight design. They noted the inclusion of their expert Jaguar and Mercedes mechanic, @dcpropulsion, who would provide insights throughout the auction. Further comments related to technical observations regarding the vehicle's components and quality, including mentions of the unique chassis build and improvements to be made, showed a balanced view of the vehicle's condition, with an appreciation for its unique construction. Multiple requesters, like @CraigInPA and @knightscape7, sought more information and videos, reflecting an ongoing engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: @brakeservo raised a question about the headlights' unconventional setup, which sparked a lighthearted clarification from @dcpropulsion. However, comments such as those from @GKC expressed concern about the vehicle's fit for taller drivers and noted potential issues with its construction materials and overall safety. @eyebeam humorously contrasted their fear of the car's flaws with an eagerness to bid, revealing mixed feelings about its quality. @spuh and others noted technical shortcomings, including the need for brake and cooling system improvements, hinting at a need for further work before it could be fully reliable.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mellowd719 expressed excitement about the auction format with 'No reserve?!? This is going to be fun!'. @GXguy470 recommended buying a good used one like this to avoid problems associated with new models. The seller, @NDK, highlighted the vehicle's impressive condition, extensive service history, and added features such as a 2019 car dolly and near-new tires, emphasizing it as a must-see unit with top-notch options. @Caymanorcarrera described it as a 'really nice tidy basic 24 yr old Class A' and acknowledged the high standards of past models. @Van3B also commended the vehicle, mentioning its appealing design and stating, 'they just don’t make ‘em like this anymore.'
Neutral: The seller, @NDK, provided thorough information about the motor coach's numerous features and specs, including details about the CAT Turbo Diesel engine, dimensions, and additional equipment. Responses to inquiries from @Farfman and others detailed various aspects of the RV's functionality, including air conditioning and maintenance history. The specifications of the motorhome were made accessible, and potential buyers were encouraged to have direct conversations through the contact button, with promises of forthcoming information regarding service records and images of the original couch.
Negative: Participants expressed concerns regarding potential wear and tear on the vehicle due to its age. @Farfman posed multiple questions regarding the operational state of several components, indicating possible issues like a leaking slide and doubts about the basements AC system. @meporsche advised on replacing the airbags due to their age, warning that maintenance might be necessary soon. There were also questions about oil leaks and other mechanical issues raised by users like @Van3B and @humblre, which hinted at the need for additional upkeep for a vehicle of this vintage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting it as a stunning and unique find. @JDB1 described it as a "beautiful car" and praised the accompanying video, while @19seventy3vette noted the model's superior aesthetics compared to earlier years and emphasized the rarity of the 1973-74 models in good condition. @Acorn19 mentioned that the car is often underrated but is truly "absolutely sweet," capturing the attention it deserves.
Neutral: The discussion included inquiries regarding the vehicle's original components and history. @aj44pct asked whether the drivetrain is original and if any engine work had been done, while @huntrs questioned the originality of the paint and details about engine modifications. @Zoki1655 (The Seller) responded that the car retains its factory drivetrain and original paint, along with aftermarket modifications like a radiator and intake manifold. He also confirmed that it is indeed a 1973 Barracuda available for sale.
Negative: Some comments reflected a need for repairs and attention to the vehicle, indicated by @Dooper43 who commented that it "definitely needs some loving" despite being described as a "rare gem." @Veloce33 noted that the car lacks air conditioning, which could be seen as a drawback for some potential buyers. Additionally, the requests for viewing the car were met with the seller's unavailability, as he mentioned being busy during an event where potential buyers may have wanted to see it.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PontiacNut praised the vehicle as a beautiful Malaga CS, while @dyp911e called it stunning. @Jekyll noted the impressive restoration, stating that the engine bay and underside look exceptionally clean, praising the attention to detail. Many commenters agreed on the car's beauty, including @whipcity76, who claimed it to be the finest Malaga E9 he has seen. Others like @3Pedalonly and @mstamyk echoed similar sentiments about its superb condition, and @afeustel highlighted the quality of the restoration and the car's desirability. @Bobby817 expressed that the listing stopped them in their tracks due to its attractiveness, indicating strong interest and admiration across the board.
Neutral: Several commenters had inquiries about specific details of the car. @lvp asked about the condition of the beltline trim, while @BK inquired about the A/C's operability, echoing concerns shared by others like @dan_unger. @NaturopathicDoctor, @Jekyll, and @wimankid were also interested in the A/C functionality. Meanwhile, @2002Drew pointed out the missing door buffers, which drew attention from other users like @KevinH and @gmueller00, who offered advice on sourcing and installing these parts. The seller, @911r, responded to these questions, clarifying details about the restoration process and the mechanical condition of the vehicle.
Negative: While the overall impression is positive, there were some concerns raised. Multiple users, such as @rubydaddio and @Dick_Steinkamp, commented on the A/C system not functioning optimally and discussed possible complications and costs involved in making it work effectively. Other comments, like those from @HBChris and @Jshelton, suggested issues with the bumper alignment and its appearance. Additionally, @Mark_Plum mentioned that they were not in the market but might reconsider due to the car's beauty, indicating how its appeal may lead to hesitation caused by concerns over functional aspects, particularly regarding the A/C and minor aesthetic details.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the car's color and overall aesthetics, with @elihbrown calling it the most underrated BMW color. @bhoffma1 referred to it as a "dreamboat," while @anevins shared a positive experience with a BMW B7 that had similar qualities. @ballDontLie described the car as awesome and praised its condition, with additional compliments coming from @bmwe90guy who noted its gorgeous design compared to current models. @Exqz8 shared personal satisfaction by mentioning that trading a Ferrari for a similar model was one of their best decisions, reiterating the model's appeal. Overall, the car is seen as an eye-catching and elegant vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification on the car's features and maintenance records. @Jamesewman inquired about the maintenance history, which @AMGGT2018 confirmed had been conducted at a BMW dealership consistently. The seller also addressed questions regarding Apple CarPlay compatibility, specifying that it is wireless and functional. Additionally, @MikeinTN and @ballDontLie made observations about tire conditions and seat discoloration, to which @AMGGT2018 provided clarifications and reassurances. Photo requests were made regarding paint imperfections and exterior color visibility, with the seller promising to provide clearer photos shortly.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concern regarding paint imperfections, with @tstaino questioning the presence of visible scratches and chips, while @matt00thomson also highlighted possible discoloration and stains on the leather. @tstaino suggested that close-up photos of these imperfections would be beneficial for potential buyers. @beamerbenzorbentley asked about the reasons behind the turbo replacement in 2024, hinting at the possibility of underlying issues. @cj11 made a lighthearted comment about the driver's headrest, which could detract from the vehicle's appeal. Though the seller promptly addressed most concerns, there was an atmosphere of skepticism surrounding certain cosmetic and maintenance aspects of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors have expressed high praise for the vehicle, emphasizing its pristine condition and the care it has received over the years. @tw8693 (The Seller) highlights the car's special familial significance and meticulous maintenance, which has contributed to its impressive state. Additional comments from @NABEnterprises detail the vehicle's original nature and the quality of its preservation, reassuring potential buyers about its background. @georgesauto also supports this sentiment, affirming the exceptional condition of the subframe welds and the overall integrity of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments provide a mix of observations and queries regarding specific features and minor issues of the car. @Coov raises a point about the known subframe separation issue but acknowledges the car's overall quality. Meanwhile, @VN95037 inquires about the driver's seatbelt guide and appreciates the photos made available. @tw8693 (The Seller) responds proactively to these inquiries and confirms the presence of detailed documentation regarding service and maintenance, reinforcing the transparency of the sale.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about certain aspects of the car that potential buyers should consider. @Coov stresses the likelihood of the rear subframe needing reinforcement due to common flaws associated with M Roadsters, suggesting that buyers budget for such repairs. @LongDucDong laments that BMW's design ethos has deteriorated over the years, implying a decline in the brand's quality. Additionally, @cheosky points out what he perceives as a potential issue with the tire rotation, although the seller reassures that the tires are correctly mounted, demonstrating the thoroughness of the vehicle's presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments express enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting it as a beautiful and well-built rig. @LoxRiver described it as checking all the boxes, suggesting that it meets various desirable features for potential buyers. Commenters like @TJA8863 and @lhurley show interest in the vehicle’s driving capabilities and its personal significance, revealing a connection to childhood memories. Additionally, the seller, @Vdwilde, shared insights about the vehicle’s modifications and restorations, showcasing a commitment to quality and care taken in the vehicle's upkeep, such as the upgraded steering box and attention to detail in the restoration process.
Neutral: Several comments seek more information about the vehicle, such as @TJA8863 asking for driving videos and pictures with the top off, indicating a cautious but curious approach to the purchase. Additionally, @dustinwhidden raised a question about past bidding history, reflecting potential buyer concerns regarding the vehicle's value. @rpopsbravo requested clarification about the drivetrain and fuel efficiency, suggesting that while potential buyers are excited, they need clear answers to make an informed decision. The seller responded to these inquiries with detailed explanations about the vehicle’s construction and features, demonstrating a willingness to provide more context about its history.
Negative: However, not all comments are entirely positive. For instance, @TMBHALO inquired about the steering condition, suggesting that there may be concerns about handling, as they noted that it seemed loose in the driving video. This comment points to a skepticism that could influence potential buyers. Additionally, while @Vdwilde noted improvements made to the vehicle, the acknowledgment that modifications were necessary may signal potential issues for some buyers. Furthermore, the absence of cruise control, as indicated in @rpopsbravo's inquiry and @Vdwilde’s response, could be perceived as a downside for those expecting modern conveniences.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1996 Dodge Viper GTS Coupe is celebrated for its impressive performance and timeless design, with comments noting its astounding 0-60 time of just 3.9 seconds and a top speed of 190 mph, which was remarkable for a car from its era. @Samljr described the vehicle as 'timeless' and @rpmf08 praised its stunning coupe look and right color combination, with enthusiasm for owning such an iconic car. @ACRSNK referred to it as 'the ICON,' underscoring its status in the collector car industry.
Neutral: The seller, @CorvetteMike, provided thorough responses to questions raised by potential buyers, confirming that the original wheels are included in the sale and addressing inquiries about the car's condition. Some comments, like those from @C3Lee and @Patrick5280, noted minor issues like cracking on the protective plastic corners and alignment of the hood, suggesting these points could be adjusted or repaired but were not signs of catastrophic damage. Additionally, @Txjudge highlighted the car's historical price, comparing inflation to assert its current value may be undervalued given the bid status.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Cobra4B regarding noticeable impacts in the driver floor area and potential damage from rough hits, while @RichBrit pointed out visible issues such as possible oxidation on the dash and what appeared to be a screw embedded in a tire, though @CorvetteMike clarified that it was merely dirt and that the dash oxidation was typical for a car of its age. Furthermore, @CapnHook emphasized the importance of inspecting the wheels for hairline cracks, which could pose a risk for driving, alerting potential buyers of inherent issues with the original wheels.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tjblevins2 (The Seller) assures that the truck is in perfect working order and ready for use, having all belts, hoses, and fluids changed recently. The seller highlights that the truck has only been lightly used, never subjected to snow or salt, making it rust free. This reassurance about the condition and maintenance of the vehicle instills confidence for potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters express curiosity about the truck's capabilities, particularly regarding its dump capacity. @Built4u seeks clarity on the maximum load it can dump, while @tjblevins2 (The Seller) responds by stating that the truck can comfortably haul 4 to 5 tons with a maximum dumping capacity estimated at 7 to 8 tons. Additionally, @olddatsun12 raises a concern about the truck's history, noting the presence of four previous owners over 23,000 miles.
Negative: @ForrestGump expresses hesitation, stating they would not want to haul 4 tons in the truck, suggesting doubts about its capability for heavier loads. There is a general trepidation surrounding the multiple ownerships of the truck, which @olddatsun12 points out as a potential red flag, raising questions about the vehicle's reliability and previous usage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are excited about the unique appearance of the vehicle, particularly its vibrant yellow color, with @slam105 noting that it may be the only yellow 'V-scoot' they've ever seen. There's enthusiasm around the vehicle's restoration process, as @JGraham mentions it is beautifully restored and expresses eagerness for potential rides on it. @piperstu appreciates the seating set-up and anticipates additional information regarding the wheels, showcasing a community interested in learning more about this rare Vespa.
Neutral: @al.abbas82 (The Seller) provides responses to various inquiries, indicating that he has limited information about the provenance of the scooter, which was acquired from a private collector. He acknowledges a listing error regarding the wheel size, clarifying that they are indeed 10" rims instead of 8" as initially stated. The seller also appreciates the feedback from commenters and commits to updating the listing, indicating a proactive stance in maintaining accurate information.
Negative: Some commenters express curiosity about the incomplete information regarding the scooter's original color and seat, with @italiandreamcar seeking clarification on these details, to which @al.abbas82 (The Seller) admits he cannot provide definitive answers. @PiperStu requests additional specifics like a video demonstration of the vehicle's features and asks about the storage compartment's condition, highlighting a lack of thorough documentation about the scooter. Overall, there seems to be a desire for more transparency regarding the vehicle's specifications and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @car-collector expressed a fondness for the Series III vehicles, noting their appeal before emissions regulations and crash bumpers, suggesting a strong following for these cars. @MNberg commented on the outstanding condition of this V12 2+2 E-type, indicating it might be one of the finest currently available. Additionally, @Walraven shared a positive experience with modifying their automatic to a 5-speed manual, encouraging potential buyers that this 2+2 is in a good condition to make similar modifications and would greatly enhance driving pleasure.
Neutral: The comments indicate a mix of curiosity and inquiries about specific details related to the vehicle. @charlesbreed asked if the car had been judged, while @Jcyraleigh inquired about the cost and feasibility of converting the car to a 5-speed transmission. @Tcat100 requested clarification on the necessity of 110 octane fuel, to which @auto-nut (The Seller) provided an explanation about the owner's preference for this type of gasoline to protect the car's components. The seller has been responsive to questions and has offered to provide more information and resources about the car's history and condition.
Negative: There were also issues raised regarding the vehicle's condition. @smoothglide mentioned that a video showing the car running was needed for better insight, and @auto-nut (The Seller) reported finding oil leaks during a routine check, which raised concerns about the car's mechanical reliability. Further details revealed several cosmetic and functional concerns, such as a scratched windshield and inconsistent gauge lighting. These points were underscored by the seller's commitment to transparency, as they listed mechanical and cosmetic flaws while remaining open to questions from potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RickyDC praised the vehicle's color and noted its new condition despite its mileage, expressing excitement over features like tube doors and both tops included with the Bronco. @HotVette complimented the aesthetics of the Bronco, specifically the red color and how it pairs well with the black accents and graphics. The seller, @ShannonMotors, confirmed the Bronco is a one-owner vehicle and provided details on the paint protection film and ceramic coating, underscoring the vehicle's well-maintained condition.
Neutral: In response to @AMGGT2018's inquiry about the rear view camera and infotainment issues, @ShannonMotors clarified that the vehicle has no such problems and that the systems are functioning properly. They also addressed concerns regarding a pending safety recall noted on the CarFax report, explaining it relates to a manufacturer-wide campaign rather than specific problems with this vehicle. They assured that any required remedy will be taken care of at no cost to the owner.
Negative: There were no distinctly negative comments discussed regarding the vehicle, as most feedback was either positive or neutral about its condition and features. @AMGGT2018 expressed concerns over the rear view camera and infotainment system, which might indicate apprehension about potential functionality issues, but this concern was addressed satisfactorily by the seller. Overall, there seems to be a lack of negative sentiments directed at the vehicle itself.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hondaboy164456 (The Seller) expressed enthusiasm for their 1994 Mazda RX-7, highlighting it as a "blast" and a great addition for any car enthusiast. Many commenters shared appreciation for the car's beautiful design, with @CogitoErgoZoom exclaiming its perfection and mentioning the absence of Bose audio equipment, which they viewed positively. @Gr8scott noted the car's original condition and rarity, suggesting it's a true time capsule that any car lover would enjoy.
Neutral: Several inquiries revolved around the technical aspects of the vehicle, including questions about the compression test and the illuminated check engine light due to an EGR issue. @Hondaboy164456 (The Seller) provided details about these issues, indicating that the EGR light did not affect drivability and expressing uncertainty about some testing conditions. Commenters, such as @WesternRedCedar and @Habu2, discussed the significance of testing conditions in relation to the compression numbers and suggested possible resolutions for the EGR issue.
Negative: Concerns about the body of the car were noted, with multiple commenters mentioning small dents and inquiring about their origins. @Justanotherkswap noticed these dents and questioned whether they were due to hail damage or otherwise. @Hondaboy164456 (The Seller) acknowledged a quote for repairing the hail damage but highlighted that only the hood dents were deemed irreparable. @DownHillSpecialist and other commenters expressed concerns as well, indicating that the level of damage might affect potential bidders' interest.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @r6erik praised the vehicle's color, calling it the best Mopar color of all time, while @Motomx44 (The Seller) noted that the paint has no scratches or rock chips, emphasizing its show quality. He mentioned that the car has been kept in a heated shop and hasn't been driven in the rain for the last 25 years. Additional comments highlighted the car's original condition, with changes limited to paint, front disc brakes, and other minor features, making it an attractive option for purists.
Neutral: Commenters shared reflections about the vehicle's color history, with @66alfa_gtv reminiscing about a former R/T with similar modifications and noting the odds of seeing two sublime Challengers at once. @lunchbocks2002 and @challengermaniac discussed their preferences regarding Mopar colors, indicating their appreciation for the vehicle despite the color change. @Motomx44 confirmed that the car is OEM except for specified modifications, and shared updates about additional photo requests, contributing to a sense of engagement in the discussion about the car's features.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding the removal of the air conditioning, with @Acorn19 expressing that it is a significant drawback. @rt383 questioned potential over spray on the weatherstrip, which @Motomx44 addressed by clarifying that the painting was done correctly. Additionally, @Dcrt7i wished there were a driving video available, and @Mtnjunkie1217 expressed initial interest in purchasing the car, showing a mix of skepticism and hesitance about the vehicle's condition and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster expressed excitement about the impressive fuel efficiency, highlighting the vehicle's 42 MPG. @mrdeezy (The Seller) shared his ownership experience, noting that the TDI Sportwagen has excellent fuel range, utility, speed, and handling. @c2kid also praised these turbodiesel wagons, emphasizing their speed and durability, while recommending an aluminum skid plate for protection. The general consensus among commenters indicates that the car is not only versatile but also enjoyable to drive, with @unclejb agreeing on the benefits of the Kerma tune that enhances performance without causing any issues.
Neutral: @LilGasser raised a concern about the condition of the headliner but @mrdeezy (The Seller) assured that it was easily cleanable and in good condition. @Crashpad inquired about the vehicle's ability to pass California smog checks, to which @mrdeezy (The Seller) confidently responded that his previous and current vehicles with similar specifications had passed smog inspections and that he would ensure the car was smogged for any California buyers. @Rangeraok had questions about the maintenance of critical engine components, and @mrdeezy provided thorough responses detailing his experience with maintenance and the type of oil used.
Negative: @WaySICK asked about potential rubbing issues when upgrading wheels and the contents of the spare tire well, showing a measure of skepticism. @el_guappo expressed concern regarding the original high-pressure fuel pump, stating that it could be a problem for some engines, and requested clarification from @mrdeezy (The Seller) on whether it had been replaced, indicating a lingering doubt about the vehicle's history. However, @mrdeezy attempted to reassure potential buyers by stating he had thorough documentation and did not believe there were issues with the fuel pump.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Craven admires the vehicle for being a proper STS, without the issues associated with Northstar engines, which is a relief. @Dollycat3 describes the STS as beautiful, showing an appreciation for the design and aesthetics of the car. @Iski2fst (The Seller) shares positive personal experiences about the car's condition, mentioning it has been well maintained with honest wear and excellent mileage on a recent trip, indicating its mechanical reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several commentators weigh in on the vehicle's condition and uniqueness. @boratdi points out that the car is rare and suggests it will require considerable work, emphasizing the importance of thorough inspection before purchase. @LukeH61101 expresses concern over a possible dent in the front passenger side, while @Chadsmith412 inquires about the originality of the grill, showing the community's focus on authenticity. The discussion also touches on modifications, such as the aftermarket roof, leading @tyresmoker to note that significant improvements were made in subsequent model years.
Negative: Comments turn critical as @boratdi highlights the drawbacks of the car's condition, including its damaged paint and the need for restoration work that could cost around $15k. The sentiment is echoed by @GP65, who notes the difficulty of finding unblemished panels and necessities for restoring the car to a more presentable state. Furthermore, @carguru82 expresses frustration over the negativity in the comment section, deeming it 'toxic nonsense' and implying the disparity between vocal critics and serious bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its beauty and restoration quality. @buttesilverbow called it a "beauty" and complimented the great color, while @saddlesore referred to it as a "classic bike and beautiful to boot," anticipating a successful sale. Others, such as @MNberg and @LaneFM, expressed admiration for its aesthetics and restoration quality, noting it as one of the best-looking Triumphs ever, with @LaneFM looking forward to adding it to their collection next to other classic bikes. @Tridentman agreed, calling it a very nice restoration and suggesting it could be worth even more than its current bid.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle showed a mix of inquiries regarding its history and features. @Precisionbob indicated a personal connection to the bike's name, as they lived near the Bonneville Salt Flats. @992Turbo raised concerns about the authenticity of the photos, leading to a clarification from @GrandpaScott that all images were originals and explained the commonality of the garage doors in the backdrop. The conversation also touched on specific features of the bike, such as the 'Hooter' horns and rear grab rail, with @ROJ providing clarification on their authenticity and correctness for the model year.
Negative: Some critiques focused on uncertainties around the bike's presentation and details. @992Turbo questioned the use of what they referred to as "cookie cutter" pictures, suggesting they seemed staged rather than original, which prompted further explanations from @GrandpaScott. Additionally, there was some skepticism regarding the bike's parts and restoration, with @Crossle28 expressing doubts about the aftermarket components. This dialogue raised concerns about the bike's originality and whether all components were indeed factory-standard or not.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally appreciate the vehicle's distinctive appearance, particularly the inclusion of the rope, which has sparked humorous banter and engagement among users. @schigh describes it as a 'bad ass Rover' and adds that it looks 'totally cool.' @TireKicker69 expresses admiration for the vehicle's roll nets, stating it looks 'awesome'. The rope's quirky aesthetic has also drawn attention, with @WAGONBOYTD noting that it helped generate interest in a crowded market of Defenders, making it a potential win for the seller.
Neutral: In terms of vehicle specifics, @Mtd360 (The Seller) provides clarifications about the rope being purely aesthetic and easily removable, emphasizing that the vehicle has been garage-kept and driven only on clear days. There is a humorous exchange about the rope's purpose, with commenters speculating its usage and making light-hearted comments about it, such as @Pista2020's joke about needing 'more rope.' @AnthonyJohn and @smoseley offer constructive feedback regarding the presence of the rope in photographs, suggesting that showing the vehicle without it may boost interest.
Negative: Some commenters voice concerns regarding the rope, viewing it as a potential detractor from the vehicle's appeal. @AnthonyJohn warns that the rope may be suppressing interest in bids, while @2hecknback raises concerns about safety with reference to the open design. Additionally, several users request photos of the vehicle without the rope, indicating that some believe it detracts from the overall aesthetic appeal, as seen in @GaryCase's commentary about the vehicle looking 'SOOOOO much better' without the rope.
![]() |
70cc-Powered 2002 Malaguti F-15 Firefox Ben Bostrom Replica
ZJM44SVA022072919
Lot 238872
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered significant praise for its unique design and limited-edition status, with @Micksmaster highlighting it as a tribute to racer Ben Bostrom and the vibrant red-and-white livery associated with his championship-winning Ducati. Enthusiasts like @Tyracious and @Geneticsdude express excitement about the scooter's racing heritage, with @Micksmaster making himself readily available for questions, adding to the positive experience around the auction. The scooter is seen as a practical option for daily use while maintaining a distinct collector's appeal, making it a desirable find for fans of Ducati history.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the scooter's construction and maintenance. @Micksmaster clarifies that it was built by Malaguti, emphasizing its historical connection to Ducati, while providing explanations about the vehicle's two-stroke engine and oil requirements. There is also an inquiry by @anthonyjp about the scooter's ability to handle knee-down riding, reflecting a mix of curiosity and moderate apprehension about its performance. Additionally, @Micksmaster explains the wear and tear on the scooter, which he attributes to normal use over its 24-year lifespan, ensuring potential buyers understand the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns have arisen regarding the scooter's condition, particularly from @pcmartin42, who points out significant damage compared to previous listings and questions the scope of the cosmetic issues, indicating a more in-depth investigation may be warranted. The skepticism surrounding the scooter's previous auction history also reflects a potential apprehension among bidders about the authenticity and value of the vehicle. This skepticism could influence potential buyers' perspectives as they weigh the scooter’s aesthetic imperfections against its collectible value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CRUSH expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, referring to it as a "3 pedal Cummins" and shows a strong desire to own it. @BBell333 describes it as an "Absolute BEAST of a rig!", indicating that the vehicle is powerful and impressive. @JakeTheSnake115 also adds to the positive sentiment by highlighting the high quality of the AEV components, showing that the upgrades are well-regarded among enthusiasts.
Neutral: @MPC_Concierge (The Seller) provides information about the auction and emphasizes their availability to answer questions. They also address @RM-Retired's inquiry about the snorkel kit by explaining its benefits for deep water performance and that it can be removed, though it will leave some visible holes. The seller assures potential buyers that the truck has never been smoked in, addressing @Toddkaz's concern about the interior condition and assuring that it presents well for its age.
Negative: The comments do not contain any overtly negative feedback; however, @RM-Retired's question regarding the deep water experience suggests some skepticism about the snorkel's effectiveness, while @Toddkaz raises a concern about the possibility of odors from smoking, although the seller promptly mitigates this worry by confirming the truck has never been smoked in.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster praised the vehicle for its perfect patina, highlighting its aesthetic appeal. @jdjonesdr reminisced about a similar model his father owned, expressing interest in potentially purchasing it. @SwiftFF5 shared a fond memory of his own GMC truck, noting its reliability and strength, which he loved despite his wife's disapproval, wishing the seller luck with the auction.
Neutral: @Cheifjunk, the seller, communicated actively with potential buyers, thanking them for their bids and stating willingness to answer questions promptly. @JohnsRides asked several detailed questions about the vehicle's specifications, including gear ratios, stereo setup, and modifications. The seller responded informatively, explaining features while noting the truck's originality and the extensive work that had been done, such as $55,000 worth of improvements to ensure it remained factory-like.
Negative: While @jcruss69 queried whether the vehicle had manual or power brakes, implying concerns about its braking system, the seller did not address any negative issues directly but remained focused on the positive aspects of the truck's features and enhancements. Overall, there were no overtly negative comments, but the seller's responses implied scrutiny of the truck's original design and any potential drawbacks.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Multiple comments highlight the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster's elegant design and performance capabilities, with @BobbyZ emphasizing its value appreciation potential and the iconic sound of its naturally aspirated V8 engine. @WingedWheels praised the car as an incredibly elegant roadster, suggesting high regard for its aesthetics. Additionally, @jrb007 noted its spacious leg and headroom, despite its nature as a true sports car, indicating a balance of comfort and sportiness, which is well appreciated by potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @1600veloce, provides thorough details about the car's availability, urging interested buyers to schedule appointments for viewings. They emphasize their commitment as car enthusiasts, offering a climate-controlled storage facility and logistics support for transport. They also answer questions about the car's features and conditions, responding to inquiries from potential buyers about the car's specifications and past ownership without any apparent issues, indicating a positive transparency about the vehicle's history.
Negative: There are concerns raised by @ThejudgeRoy regarding the paint gauge readings, which he noted to be lower than factory specifications, raising questions about possible past paintwork or polishing. This remark hints at potential apprehension about the vehicle's condition compared to standard expectations. Additionally, @dogecoin questioned the reason for the car's quick resale, while @RearwheelRy found the cockpit space tight, reflecting on potential comfort limitations within the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed a strong appreciation for the Porsche 911SC Cabriolet, highlighting its uniqueness and the quality of its presentation. @Greg_F commended the seller for taking excellent photos, while @dougbrown called it an "Incredible SC Cab." Users like @takethecar noted how the car feels like a time capsule, with potential for dramatic visual enhancements. @B.Fryk offered insights from a former 911SC owner, emphasizing the enjoyable driving experience these models provide, especially with a heritage linked to reputable entities like Porsche Cars North America.
Neutral: The seller, @mbheritage, has actively engaged with potential buyers, addressing various inquiries and providing updates on the vehicle's condition and features. They noted the manual soft top and assured that the PP plates would be transferred with the car, signaling transparency and helpfulness. Furthermore, they responded constructively to requests for more photographs, stating they would provide additional images taken in better lighting to capture the accurate color of the vehicle. @skylane9 raised questions about the air conditioning system, to which the seller confirmed that it had undergone maintenance and is now functioning well after being evacuated, pressure checked, and recharged.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the car, specifically related to the air conditioning system. @skylane9's inquiry about potential issues reflects a willingness to understand the vehicle's current condition, which could impact buyer interest. While @B.Fryk noted that air conditioning in these models is generally limited, the acknowledgment of these issues suggests some caution among potential buyers. Additionally, @86targa's request for documentation and original options indicates a desire for more assurance regarding the vehicle's provenance and completeness, suggesting that there are aspects that might need further clarification to build buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the car's stunning aesthetics and pristine condition, with @Longmire45 proclaiming it a "Black & White Beauty" and @John2Fast11 describing it as "pristine, looks factory new." Many users, including @Rock2001 and @Espanolie, emphasize the vehicle's attractiveness, citing its "beautiful" and "spectacular" design. @DavidWasco (The Seller) also expresses pride in its originality and luxury, referring to it as a "total sleeper car" that receives "thumbs up" from admirers, enhancing its appeal in the market.
Neutral: Several commenters pose questions and provide insights on the vehicle's specifications and maintenance, including recalls from GM identified by @Dave18SF. @DavidWasco (The Seller) clarifies that all recalls have been performed at Paradise Chevrolet, showcasing his commitment to the car's upkeep. User @2014LTDLTZ discusses the challenges of converting the automatic transmission to a manual one, suggesting it could affect the car's value and noting the availability of parts may be limited, which presents both practical considerations and subjective opinions about modifications.
Negative: While the responses are largely positive, there is an underlying caution regarding potential modifications, highlighted by @2014LTDLTZ who indicates that a manual swap could impact the car's originality and value. Furthermore, the concerns over parts availability for such alterations may deter some buyers, as manufacturers like GM often limit the production of model-specific components. @DavidWasco (The Seller) also expresses a strong stance on preserving the car's factory condition, indicating that any changes would be viewed negatively, particularly by collectors who value originality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LongiMotorsports (The Seller) describes the GL550 as a nice and dealer-serviced vehicle, highlighting the recent maintenance that has been performed. With a detailed list of services, including fluid changes, air shocks replacement, and tire servicing, it emphasizes the care taken to maintain the car. The seller has also encouraged bidders to ask for any additional pictures or videos to ensure transparent communication about the vehicle’s condition. Furthermore, there are no reported odors or mechanical issues, presenting a well-maintained unit ready for sale.
Neutral: Some potential buyers like @aktash1 raised concerns about the vehicle's recent service history, inquiring if there were recommendations left unaddressed, but @LongiMotorsports clarified that the vehicle was traded in and serviced under dealership protocols. @HairOnFire asked about various mechanical components, to which the seller assured the absence of leaks and noted the recent service performed by a Mercedes dealership. This establishes a middle ground, showing both concerns and reassurances about the car's condition.
Negative: Comments from users like @Schnarcher99 and @mstakacs discussed possible imperfections and suggested issues, such as the state of the sidemirrors and the degradation of the PPF. @ENoel expressed concern about potential smoke odors and the functionality of the CD player. These comments indicate some skepticism about the car's complete condition, despite the seller's positive presentation and maintenance claims.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Pcar85 (The Seller) shared that the car was a well-kept second vehicle owned by his mother, who decided to sell it after 10+ years because she felt guilty about not driving it. The car has low mileage of only 11k miles, is always garaged, and comes with a cover that will be included in the sale. @pato expressed admiration for both the car and the seller, noting his transparency throughout the process. The car's condition, described as almost new, has garnered positive attention from various commenters, suggesting that it is indeed a desirable purchase for the right buyer.
Neutral: Several questions were raised about the vehicle's maintenance and specific features. Comments from @atlanta1998, @SParis, and @AudiFanatic reflect curiosity about the car's history, such as whether it was ever smoked in, the date codes on the tires, and specifics about the dash cover. @kpark10 inquired about door card replacements and repair quotes, while @pato sought more detailed pictures of scratches on the windshield. @RJ80 noted the high service costs from the dealer, advising future buyers to find independent specialists for maintenance.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding minor issues with the vehicle. @kpark10 highlighted potential problems with the door cards, which may require attention for separation. @pato mentioned scratches on the windshield, questioning their visibility and impact during driving. @motoguzzi70 asked about the headliner potentially sagging. @RJ80 commented on the high expenses for service records at the dealership, reflecting skepticism about ongoing maintenance costs. Overall, while the car is praised, these comments reveal a level of caution among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dgclassiccars expresses enthusiasm for the 1957 Fiat 600, highlighting its appeal and rarity, particularly with the original documents and warranty booklet included—a valuable asset for collectors. @porkpiehat appreciates the car's Grigio e Bianco color scheme and the attractive lines designed by Dante Giacosa, noting the charm of the vehicle since their first sighting in 1959. @classichondaman admires the potential virtues of this early car, complimenting the color combination and seat fabric, indicating a positive reception overall from enthusiasts.
Neutral: The comments reflect a general interest in the Fiat 600, with @SPQR_LegioIV inquiring about its registration with ASI, to which @dgclassiccars confirms it is registered. The information about shipping costs is also addressed by @dgclassiccars, providing details about transport options from the shop to the East Coast, which could be a neutral factor for potential buyers considering logistics.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive or neutral, there is a hint of skepticism regarding the shipping costs. @classichondaman mentions their concern about the shipping fees associated with purchasing the car, suggesting it could be a drawback for some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed excitement and admiration for the R32 Nismo, with many reminiscing about its legendary status among car enthusiasts. @Calamari_Jujutsu called it the best Skyline GTR ever made, praising its performance on tracks and reliability of its RB26DETT engine, while others like @fabulous71 highlighted the rarity and high value of the car, suggesting it could sell for a significant amount due to its stellar condition and low mileage. @expletive echoed this sentiment, claiming it to be an outstanding example of the best Skyline ever built, with @Mhodds102 also noting its untouched beauty. Overall, the vehicle has generated a lot of positive buzz.
Neutral: Several commenters provided additional context regarding the car's condition and history. @Brandon1982 (The Seller) confirmed he has documentation proving the vehicle's low mileage and original condition, mentioning the choice to retain its originality by not repainting certain components. @b1k0 raised concerns about rust on the exhaust and asked about inspections, to which @Brandon1982 replied that the car's engine compartment paint is typical for its age and offered to facilitate inspections. Additionally, discussions arose about the vehicle's history in relation to contamination concerns from the Fukushima zone, with @Totoro and @Bidder29 exchanging information on the associated risks and market context.
Negative: Concerns about contamination and the car's condition were raised by some commenters. @slonnik specifically worried about potential radiation issues from its origin, emphasizing the implications of failing US customs tests. This concern echoed earlier comments regarding the vehicle's history and the Fukushima incident, prompting questions about the reliability of documents and testing. @b1k0's inquiry about the legitimacy of the 12,000-kilometer claim and signs of wear added to the skepticism surrounding the vehicle's condition. Overall, while enthusiasm mainly dominated the discussion, significant apprehensions about potential legal and safety issues remained.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @sharkman9000, the seller, highlighted that their experience with the car over four years has been largely positive, describing it as an "absolute riot" and appreciating its speed on highways, achieving 30 mpg on a long trip. They praised the car's exhaust sound and handling, stating it feels great on back roads and highway cruising. The KW coilovers contribute to a smooth ride while maintaining excellent handling, making the car enjoyable to drive. @PJH echoed these sentiments, sharing their own dependable history with a Maserati for 19 years, emphasizing its faithful performance despite concerns about resale value.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in technical discussions regarding the vehicle's specifications and maintenance. @ApriliaNut and @Stuttgartfanboy conversed about the different engine options available for the 2011 Quattroporte models, confirming the presence of the 4.2 engine as a special order option. Additionally, @Dontaskmewhy raised questions about the functionality of the AuCar system and its compatibility with existing steering wheel buttons, while @Jhendri542 provided insights on the vehicle's transmission history, clarifying misconceptions about previous models and their reliability, especially focusing on the importance of regular maintenance.
Negative: On the downside, @Jhendri542 pointed out that the Maserati brand has a notorious reputation, often due to previous transmission issues and maintenance neglect by some owners. They noted that post-second ownership, maintenance typically declines, leading to further problems. Concerns about the lack of accessible parts and the difficulty of finding reliable service options were also highlighted. @Ziallen mentioned that while the cars are undervalued due to this bad reputation, they are generally reliable if well-maintained, underscoring the need for careful ownership and servicing to avoid common pitfalls associated with the model.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a rust-free southern Suburban, which is praised for its overall quality and condition. @genevamotorcars (The Seller) expresses excitement about offering such a nice vehicle, highlighting its impressive features. Commenter @BCBriones appreciates the full AFM delete done on the vehicle, implying longevity and reliability, and refers to it as a 'nice rig.'
Neutral: Several inquiries from potential buyers indicate a strong interest in the vehicle's specifications, such as the presence of a trailer hitch and electrical plug (@Ptedes1639) as well as the engine hours (@Bentley1WO). @genevamotorcars (The Seller) responds to these requests promptly, confirming that the Suburban comes with a factory hitch, a light plug, and provides the relevant photos as requested by @ronsstuff.
Negative: There are some areas of concern mentioned by potential buyers, such as the lack of a built-in brake controller, as noted by @Ptedes1639, which could be a downside for those planning to tow. Additionally, @CTT inquires about the date codes on the tires, which suggests there may be some hesitation regarding the tire condition even though the seller assures that they are in great shape with no dry rot.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BeastRig describes the vehicle as a "Beast of a rig," implying powerful performance and impressive capabilities. @MontanaBroncos recognizes the unique paint scheme as a standout feature, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @gmagno appreciates the effort that went into personalizing the rig, noting the cool depth of the paint technique and expressing hope for top dollar at the auction. @Kidsixpack has mixed feelings initially but ultimately finds the truck badass after examining the details closely. The seller, @ccogman, echoes these sentiments, emphasizing the vehicle's power and unique charm, and assures that potential buyers will not be disappointed with the paint.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @JSpecht, @Wadejus12, and @Forthefords, display ambivalence toward the vehicle's color scheme. @JSpecht mentions curiosity about shipping costs without expressing opinion on the paint job, while @Wadejus12 candidly states their disapproval of the color, albeit with intentions to bid. @Forthefords recognizes the paint job as a work of art despite it not aligning with their personal taste, suggesting a consensus on appreciating the artistry involved without necessarily liking it. This indicates a shared recognition of craftsmanship, even if personal preferences vary.
Negative: @Wadejus12 explicitly criticizes the color scheme, calling it the "ugliest job" they've ever seen, which showcases a strong negative reaction. @Forthefords also implies a negative perspective by stating they wouldn't display the piece in their gallery, despite acknowledging its artistic merit. The contrasting comments illustrate a divide in opinion, where personal taste plays a significant role in the perception of beauty and desirability of the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz expressed admiration for the vehicle, stating that it would attract attention wherever it goes. @SpencerG (The Seller) confirmed the car's excellent condition, noting that there are very few like it on the island of Mallorca, reinforcing the car's rarity and desirability. @JonnieB also received detailed responses regarding the vehicle's features and ensured that all systems are functioning correctly, highlighting that everything works smoothly without any leaks.
Neutral: @GIJames4U raised a question regarding the transmission type listed in the auction, seeking clarification on whether it is actually manual or automatic. @Talega0321 inquired about the cost of shipping the vehicle back to the United States, demonstrating interest but without expressing definitive opinions about the car itself. @spliceG (The Seller) provided various responses to questions, acknowledging the confusion around the transmission and offering updates about shipping costs and vehicle history.
Negative: @darkangel123 requested a test-drive video, indicating some skepticism around the vehicle's performance without direct proof. @JonnieB asked numerous questions about potential issues such as oil leaks, which may imply concerns about the vehicle's condition despite @SpencerG's reassurances. Additionally, @JONNIEB's insistence on detailed documentation about the vehicle's performance and regulatory compliance points to potential doubts regarding the clarity of the auction listing and the vehicle's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RumbleAuto describes the vehicle as a "beautiful example," indicating a high appreciation for its condition and aesthetic appeal. This positive sentiment suggests that the vehicle has been well-maintained and could attract interest from potential buyers.
Neutral: @mikeydo requests additional images of the front bumper cover and suggests there may be some damage, as he notices cracks. @cem350z inquires about the timing belt, indicating a common concern regarding vehicle maintenance. @mike3316 expresses skepticism about the vehicle's history, questioning how it has only 52k miles while having seven previous owners. @timoshea61 (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, indicating that further pictures will be available and addressing the concerns about the timing belt and mileage.
Negative: @mike3316's comment reflects distrust regarding the vehicle's history, raising concerns about the large number of previous owners, which could imply potential reliability issues or a lack of care. Additionally, the request for pictures of possible damage and the inquiry about the timing belt suggest that there may be underlying maintenance issues that could deter potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @10Chenango commented that the vehicle is still really nice and worth much more than $15k, indicating a positive perception of its value and appearance. @aSingh39 (The Seller) expressed pride in the meticulous services performed on the Honda S2000, highlighting its complete maintenance history and readiness for the next owner. This showcases the car's value as well as the commitment to restoring its condition, which many potential buyers might find appealing.
Neutral: @aSingh39 (The Seller) provided detailed information regarding the car's history and maintenance, addressing questions from @brian7470 and @Mystang86 about the front bumper and convertible top, respectively. He mentioned that the bumper was resprayed due to earlier scrapes and explained the need for a new convertible top due to cracking of the original window. @Johnho888 inquired about potential door dings, which were confirmed by @aSingh39 as existing but not excessive, while @sphipps sought clarification on specific paint touch-ups.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the car, with @matteo_goretti commenting that the bottom looked rough for a car with only 21,000 miles, suggesting possible winter driving. @NSXphil criticized the photography quality, mentioning that it didn't make the car stand out and suggested it might show signs of rust or exposure to winter road conditions. Overall, these comments reflect skepticism about the vehicle's condition despite its low mileage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @g8rjimbo expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, referring to it as a great and reliable weapon. @HairOnFire commented positively on the vibrant fluorescent green color, calling it both lovely and brutal. Several commenters, including @Dave_Car_Guy, appreciated its performance, noting how great it sounded on the dyno, while @Gmmuscleusa highlighted the challenge of obtaining a bright green color from GM, praising the vehicle nonetheless. Furthermore, @dcarnold56, the seller, confirmed multiple aspects of the car's quality and performance, noting it starts and runs perfectly, and the exhaust system has had upgrades, adding to the car's appeal.
Neutral: The discussions also covered various neutral aspects primarily focusing on technical inquiries. For instance, @The-Dog and @georgep650 asked detailed questions about the vehicle's original transmission, modifications to the suspension, and functionality of the exhaust system, leading to clarifications from @dcarnold56. The comments indicated a willingness to engage in thorough discussions regarding the car's specifications and modifications, which suggests the vehicle is available for serious buyers who are well-informed about such details. Additionally, @sk8nSam questioned the timing of the sale in relation to past investments, reflecting a neutral stance on the selling decision.
Negative: However, there were some negative sentiments among the comments. @notlikelytowin4 pointed out that the tires appeared too soft for street use, implying potential drawbacks for everyday drivers. @anthonyjp expressed concern about the high maintenance costs faced by the seller, implying that the lack of a reserve on the auction could be nerve-racking. These negative comments highlighted potential issues around usability and the financial implications of owning such a track-oriented vehicle, raising questions about its suitability beyond racing contexts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 1955 Pre-A Speedster being sold has garnered impressive praise from several commenters who highlight its rarity and beauty. @AMCNJ expresses sheer amazement with a simple, "Wow! Just wow!" while @VioletPearl and @JAY-Z describe the car as elegant and stunning in appearance. The seller, @nweuro, provides detailed information about the car's history, rarity, and the authenticity of its parts, emphasizing its strong performance and the quality of restoration and care it has received. Others, including @Android356 and @bobofohio, echo feelings of admiration for the stylish color combination and overall aesthetic of the vehicle, suggesting that the car promises a delightful driving experience.
Neutral: In the discussion surrounding the car, several commenters provide insights based on their experiences with similar models. @Jim_Liberty shares thoughts on the gauges and expresses his admiration for the car, albeit with minor critiques. @GrueneCarrera and others appreciate the details of the car, like the early regulator logo and the condition of specific parts, while @nweuro responds to inquiries regarding the car's specifics and the past restoration work. There are mixed reviews about certain aspects, such as the age of the restoration and minor flaws in the paint, which the seller addresses by assuring transparency.
Negative: Despite the overall praise, there are critiques raised by some commenters regarding authenticity and parts replacement. @revron questions the accuracy of the car's Certificate of Authenticity (COA), suggesting potential discrepancies in model year classification. Comments from @weissach and @Prewar_Roadster highlight various issues like incorrect gauges, a non-original oil filter color, and floor pan replacements that detract from the car's authenticity. @runner4fun and @zeres voice concerns about the car's changed color and potential pricing, hinting that despite its quality, there are elements that might affect its collectible value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm about the vehicle's overall condition. @1940FordCOE remarks on its high mileage without exhaust issues, appreciating the durability of the stainless steel system. @CMD1 (The Seller) highlights the van's rust-free status, having spent its life in Texas, and shares confidence that it is well-maintained with recent timing belt and water pump replacements. Users also praise the van's color and design, with @LSU2020 complimenting its appearance in the auction.
Neutral: Several users raise questions regarding specific features and conditions of the vehicle. @bogtrotter inquires about possible rust in the exhaust, while @lj4028aim asks about the timing belt change timeline. Additionally, @SkinnyB requests confirmation regarding the original carpet mats, illustrating interest in the vehicle's full history. @CMD1 (The Seller) responds to queries about the carpets, shipping, and clarifies details about maintenance, including the timing belt and other components.
Negative: While the comments are largely positive, some users express minor concerns. @bogtrotter questions the exhaust condition, noting a potential rust issue, although this is addressed by @1940FordCOE, who doubts it based on the construction material. @lj4028aim's inquiry about the timing belt change suggests a level of caution regarding maintenance history. Overall, while few negative points are raised, they reflect a desire for clarity in the vehicle's historical and structural integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are generally impressed with the vehicle's aesthetic qualities, particularly the 8 lug wheels, which seem to evoke nostalgia among many. @RickonaDeuce expresses a longstanding love for these wheels, while @2002WS6 shares that the wheels contribute to the car's nostalgic appeal. @CrankyGoat even humorously states that if they could sleep with any car, this would be the one. Additionally, @hairyolds appreciates the car's original gold color and overall design, connecting it to its appearances in films like 'Goodfellas.'
Neutral: Several comments discuss the vehicle's specifications and missing parts without expressing strong opinions either way. @GIJames4U confirms the car has a 3 Speed Automatic transmission, clarifying the specs for potential buyers. @EmichaelWilliams1973 (The Seller) answers inquiries about fender skirts and wheel well moldings, indicating that these parts are not included with the sale and providing details about additional documentation associated with the car. @ski.dive suggests posting a driving video, indicating a need for further demonstration of the vehicle's capabilities.
Negative: On the downside, there are some critiques regarding the vehicle's noise and overall execution. @Yomamma acknowledges the car's cool factor but mentions that the noise may not align with its appearance. @Pfeil raises concerns over the missing parts mentioned in the listing and questions the relevance of pictures posted by the seller, suggesting a lack of clarity regarding the vehicle's current condition. This indicates some potential buyer hesitation, as there are unresolved questions about what is included in the sale.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments praising the vehicle highlight its impressive condition and rarity, with many potential buyers expressing admiration for the low mileage and timeless design. @DLVRYMN describes it as 'Top Shelf,' while @nexusautobrokers calls it 'SEXY!!!!!!!' emphasizing its attractive appearance. Several users, including @Dean_Laumbach, commend the car's well-preserved state, stating it evokes strong feelings and likening it to a rare bottle of fine wine. Furthermore, the seller, @michaelmotorcar, shares enthusiasm for the auction, noting the unique color combination and inviting bidders to view the car in person.
Neutral: Some comments reflect logistical or historical inquiries about the vehicle. @Mrtiticus inquires about the presence of service records and factory manuals, while @KevinH and @ScottcHenson point out a discrepancy concerning the vehicle's location, clarifying that it is in New Jersey and not Florida as initially stated. This has sparked discussion among users, including @mercjrl1 and @19Willys46, about previous auction prices and the vehicle history. The conversation suggests a deep interest in the details behind the car's maintenance and past sales.
Negative: There are a few critical remarks, particularly regarding missed details that the seller has made. Users like @GAP1966 mention changes to the car's appearance from its last sale, specifically regarding chrome wheel arches, and express a preference for the current look. Others, like @ScottcHenson, note a lack of bids building excitement ahead of the auction, which could imply concerns about the car's value in the current market. Overall, while the overall sentiment leans positively, there are hints of skepticism about the auction's outcome.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BlueChipCar (The Seller) expressed excitement in presenting this unique 840ci to the BaT community, highlighting its desirable 6-Speed manual transmission and assuring potential bidders of its excellent condition. @HalogenLTD, a previous seller of the vehicle, praised its mechanical integrity, noting that it ranks in the top 10% of E31s for being well-sorted. He mentioned the car's impressive electrical stability and smooth driveline, making it a reliable choice for enthusiasts. Additionally, @jim_rosenthal shared a positive personal experience, describing the 840Ci as one of the best long-distance travelers he has owned, appreciating its rarity and performance.
Neutral: Comments from @mlowengrub suggested that while the white exterior looks good, the interior redesign appears too busy for their taste. @gritsandbourbon acknowledged the quality of the interior work but pointed out the frequent reselling of the vehicle, raising questions about the reasons behind its market presence. @Cartoonz noted the vehicle's Euro market coded ECU, which allows it to pass smog tests in California, indicating a versatility appreciated by prospective owners.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about the car's condition and history. @boca_rat queried the previous ownership's short duration and implied it might be a ‘quick flip,’ while @DeutscheRedhead suggested potential discrepancies regarding the exhaust tips from prior sales and questioned the alignment of the trunk lid, hinting at possible past damage. Additionally, @Brutus37 pointed out a potential mechanical issue, questioning a noise that might be linked to a lifter problem. @Hosackies further questioned the short tenure of the previous owner, stirring speculation about the car's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Caymanorcarrera expressed a love for mini RVs and highlighted the tidy appearance of the vehicle, noting its manual transmission. @JackSweny complemented the concept of mini RVs for the keys and acknowledged the vehicle's attractive features. @Lt0304 praised the camper, calling it 'cool,' while @89lincolntc found a lot to like about it, wishing good luck with the auction. @67stroker pointed out the distinctions between this Westfalia and a weekender model, enhancing appreciation for the full camper's amenities.
Neutral: @Fargie provided remarks on the presentation of the vehicle, referencing an extensive photo gallery. Several commenters, including @tbseibert and @johnnydag, posed questions regarding the vehicle's service history, appliances' functionality, and maintenance specifics, showing a general interest in the vehicle's condition and care. @Autogalerie-us (The Seller) reassured the community regarding their thorough servicing of the Westfalia, indicating they had over two inches of service records available and planned to upload them for prospective buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Fargie about potential water damage, cigarette burns, and the overall condition of the van's carpeting, prompting inquiries into odor issues and possible maintenance history. @Scrogdiggle noted discrepancies in the vehicle's seams and paint, suggesting prior body work may have been done. The existing comments included apprehensions about the vehicle's historical repairs and overall authenticity, with a few potential buyers hesitant due to slight discrepancies in appearance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments from @dnorris18, the seller, convey a strong enthusiasm for the Cayenne, highlighting his satisfaction with the vehicle despite his recent upgrade to a 2013 GTS. He expresses a willingness to assist potential buyers by answering questions and providing more information, indicating his openness and trustworthiness in the selling process. The seller also emphasizes the vehicle's positive characteristics, such as its strong braking performance linked to the hybrid battery's charging mechanism.
Neutral: @mrtzmd raises an important point about the health of the battery, referencing the ten-year warranty these vehicles have. @dnorris18 responds by assuring that there have been no issues with the battery's functionality during his ownership. He notes that the vehicle has been kept in northern states, which tends to support better battery health, thereby addressing any concerns with a rational explanation.
Negative: There are no overt negative comments specifically detailing issues with the vehicle itself. However, the concern raised by @mrtzmd about the battery health suggests that there could be apprehension regarding potential future performance given the lifespan of hybrid batteries. @dnorris18 addresses this concern but does not provide specific data, which may leave some potential buyers wanting more concrete evidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and performance capabilities. @Kie described the bike as a 'sweetheart' and noted the rarity of an original owner '97 748 with low mileage. @Zizu praised the 748 as highly enjoyable and well-balanced, emphasizing its fun ride. @cardesignmind mentioned their fondness for 748s, particularly in yellow, and wished the seller good luck with the auction. The seller, @Goducky150, received compliments for being the original owner and maintaining the bike meticulously, including upgrades such as the Gold-Anodized Oberon clutch slave cylinder that improved ride quality.
Neutral: Several users inquired about the bike's specifications and maintenance history, with @ripper996 asking for clarification on potential damage to the bodywork and the timing belt's replacement. @Kie and @YourMateNate discussed the bike's production date and the wheel's design features, noting its transitional characteristics. @caffine and @X_L_R_8_R added comments about the unique aspects of this 748's wheels and offered thanks to the seller for providing details and photographs of the rear wheel's date code. Overall, there was a consensus that further documentation and clarification of the bike's history would enhance buyer confidence.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the bike's durability and the condition of specific parts, particularly by @ripper996, who questioned the stability of a damaged headlight assembly that had not been shown in the latest pictures. They also asked whether the mount on the fuel tank could be removed without damaging the paint. While @Goducky150 assured buyers that the assembly was secure and that the mounting could be removed without issue, some users remained cautious, reflecting on the age of components like the tires, with @Twoleftthumbs confirming their decade-old status. Overall, these questions addressed potential red flags about the bike's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its stunning restoration quality and appealing design. @russgardener referred to the restoration as beautiful and expressed a wish for the seller good luck with the sale. @boaboyoz described it as an absolutely fabulous FJ40 with a beautiful build. @beauparker81 praised the vehicle's olive color, noting it as one of the best factory colors available and commending the power steering and AC addition as enhancing the FJ40's superior platform.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on inquiries about specific features and the history of the vehicle. @aaz513 asked about the origin of the front bucket seats, while @packbrian1 inquired regarding the U.S. specifications of the vehicle. @Meter raised questions about the rear heater and the placement of front seat belts, indicating a desire for more documentation on the vehicle's history and the work done during the restoration.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism regarding the quality of certain aspects of the vehicle. For instance, @larryjo admitted to liking the vehicle's color but expressed a personal dislike for the tan seats and door cards. @Blizzard340 concurred, describing the upholstery color as 'soccer mom ish.' Additionally, @Meter pointed out potential rust on the gauge cluster and requested more detailed documentation of the vehicle's history, suggesting that the absence of such could detract from its value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @jtrujillo2004 loves their 2006 E90 325xi, praising its fun driving experience and ease of maintenance. They note that its design avoids turbochargers and direct injection, contributing to its long-term reliability. @SuperCarsLLC, the seller, echoes this sentiment, agreeing that the vehicle is indeed fun and reliable, reinforcing the positive experience associated with the model.
Neutral: @Tpetty raises a concern regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, specifically mentioning the valve cover gaskets being replaced a decade ago and the common problem of oil pan gasket issues in the xi models. They inquire whether the car has any oil leaks, showcasing a moderate level of caution but not outright negativity.
Negative: Despite the overall positive comments, @Tpetty's mention of potential issues with the oil pan gasket serves as a reminder of possible maintenance challenges. While @SuperCarsLLC assures that there are no leaks and points to the car's thorough maintenance history, the reference to these common problems can create some unease for potential buyers regarding the vehicle's long-term reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @arlenray (The Seller) mentions that the dash of the vehicle has no cracks, indicating it has been well maintained. The seller has made several repairs to the vehicle, including replacing a leaking air conditioning hose and a weak window motor, which demonstrates a commitment to ensuring the car is in good working order. @racerboy221 expresses enthusiasm for the brand, noting their experience with multiple Mercedes vehicles, which adds a positive perspective to the car's appeal.
Neutral: Multiple commenters, including @car-collector and @Janos_z, provide observations on the vehicle's condition without strong emotional bias but highlight concerns, such as the unclear status of mold and potential dampness. The engine compartment is described as spotless, contrasting the interior's shape. Additionally, @arlenray (The Seller) offers reassurance regarding the car's maintenance history, clarifying various aspects about switches and the absence of rust, while also promising to address any cleaning needs before the sale.
Negative: Several comments express significant concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, particularly about signs of mold and damp areas. @Mywhite908 questions the potential for the car having been flooded, while @Fredkoo comments on visible mold in the trunk. @leftlane11 critiques the overall cleanliness of the car, suggesting that it requires a thorough cleaning to improve its appeal, mentioning that even basic maintenance could enhance its auction prospects. @CCDIII describes the car incidentally as 'nasty', reflecting a strong negative sentiment towards its current state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Studebaker pickup truck, highlighting its stunning aesthetic and nostalgic value. @gahj84 remarked on its beauty, wishing it could stand alongside their classic car, while @mbstude called it a top-notch 2R pickup, demonstrating a clear appreciation for its quality. @SailingJohn (The Seller) received appreciation for maintaining the truck well and providing a rich history about its past ownership and auction history. Commenters like @Studedude reminisced about their childhood experiences with similar trucks, emphasizing the truck's appeal and sentimental value.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the technical features and specifications of the truck, with @SailingJohn confirming the truck's upgraded 3-speed/Overdrive transmission. Commenters like @Lonemalt and @56PackardMan requested clarifications regarding the functionality of the vehicle's components, demonstrating that potential buyers are interested in both performance and reliability. @DeusEquitare raised various questions about the truck's condition, mileage, and previous usage, indicating that a mix of curiosity and due diligence is evident among viewers.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, some concerns were noted. @Dannyboy questioned the electrical setup of the truck, suggesting it might be incorrectly configured, which could impact its operation. @DeusEquitare pointed out an auditory issue during a driving video, speculating about a clicking noise that may not be related to the truck itself. While these issues were not predominant in the comments, they reflect a cautious perspective that some users have regarding the vehicle's mechanical integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The 2012 Mercedes Benz C207 E350 Coupe is praised for its stunning features and premium packages. @aegmotorsports highlighted the vehicle's low mileage of 45,000, along with key features such as the Premium P02 Package, AMG Styling Package, and various luxury amenities including heated and ventilated seats, a panoramic glass sunroof, and advanced safety features like lane keeping assist. The overall impression of the vehicle is positive with multiple commenters expressing admiration for the car's stylish design and its comprehensive list of high-end specifications.
Neutral: Some commenters sought additional information about the vehicle, which @aegmotorsports provided with prompt and thorough responses. Questions regarding service records, fluid conditions, and general maintenance were addressed, establishing a sense of transparency regarding the car's condition. For instance, @1Marauder inquired about transmission service and brake pads, to which the seller reassured potential buyers that there were no issues and that the vehicle was maintained well.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the car's mechanical performance, particularly around noise during maneuvers and the general maintenance history. @Victuals asked about potential noises while turning, indicating a possible concern for prospective buyers, with @aegmotorsports confirming that there were no issues in this area. The only issue cited was a minor visual artifact in the video regarding LED lighting, which the seller clarified was not reflective of real-life performance. This points to a need for prospective buyers to ensure they are addressing any potential doubts before making a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster expressed admiration for the vehicle's appearance with stock wheels and large tires, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @1N33DCR0550V3R called it a rig and @Discobob agreed, describing the wheel and tire combination as "absolutely delicious" and expressing hopes for the truck's success. @replimod commented on the beauty of the truck and expressed interest in it, although noting it lacked a third pedal. @dhonthehill expressed envy over not owning such a striking vehicle, calling it a giant 'ginger.' @Bigblue462 (The Seller) received positive feedback for how the truck looks.
Neutral: @RY9 asked for clarification regarding the transmission, indicating confusion over whether it was a 727 or a 46 four-speed, and inquired about the truck's gearing. @Jayzee1 provided information that the truck is geared at 3.55. @Bigblue462 (The Seller) acknowledged a mistake regarding the transmission type and confirmed it is indeed a four-speed automatic, as validated by @bringatrailer who noted that the listing was updated accordingly. @Cade702 raised additional questions about the Killer Dowel Pin and any potential leaks, to which @Bigblue462 (The Seller) responded that the Killer Dowel Pin issue has been addressed and confirmed no blow by or known leaks.
Negative: There were no explicitly negative comments regarding the vehicle; however, @replimod's mention of the missing third pedal could imply a sense of disappointment from potential buyers who value manual transmission options. Additionally, @Cade702's inquiry about leaks and blow by suggests a cautious perspective on the truck's mechanical condition, seeking reassurance on its reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Scotty14537 describes the Jeep Grand Cherokee WK as being in nearly new condition and highlights its desirable features such as the "eagle" Hemi 5.7 engine and almost every available option. He emphasizes the vehicle's reliability and the fun driving experience it offers, reinforcing potential buyers' confidence in its quality. Additionally, @Scotty14537 is responsive to inquiries from potential buyers, indicating a willingness to communicate and share more details about the vehicle throughout the auction process, including offering to post videos showing various functions of the Jeep.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, @flal79 raises important questions about the vehicle's functionality and condition. They inquire about a reported accident on the Carfax report and ask about the status of the rear cargo cover. @Scotty14537 addresses these queries directly, offering assurance regarding the vehicle's performance and sharing that there are no outstanding recalls, according to his checks. The interaction maintains a neutral tone, focusing on gathering necessary information without leading to negative implications.
Negative: Some potential buyers express concerns about the vehicle's history and functionality. @flal79 points out a previous accident noted in the Carfax report, seeking more information about potential damages. There are also inquiries about safety recalls, which @Scotty14537 admits he is unfamiliar with. This lack of comprehensive knowledge regarding the vehicle's past could raise doubts among prospective buyers, highlighting a potential gap in transparency about the Jeep's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bobbity expresses sheer excitement over the vehicle with a simple, enthusiastic Wow!, while @Flat6Racer appreciates the car's gorgeous color and well-redone interior, encouraging potential buyers to buy, drive, and love it. @Vic (The Seller) welcomes everyone to the auction, emphasizing the car's perfect running condition and remarkable color with the right modifications, while @Ant5842 and @Frankieballs commend its beauty and ideal stance, with @Frankieballs also noting the color as perfection despite a minor quibble about the shifter. @Fargie and @Caymanorcarrera both highlight the car's stunning appearance, detailing aspects like the sound and history of grey market imports, respectively.
Neutral: In a discussion related to the vehicle's history, @shervinator provides insights about its import status, arguing against the information in the Carfax regarding its import year and discussing the grey market regulations. @dalegosfast raises a question about the misalignment of the hood, to which @Vic (The Seller) responds with a clarification. Other discussions from buyers like @997.2GT3RS and @nine17K touch on potential bodywork issues and the color alignment of inner fenders, seeking detailed responses from @Vic for a clearer understanding of any past repairs or modifications. @EmojiCowboy asks about water damage, which @Vic promptly denies, stating the car is in good condition.
Negative: Concerns arise from @997.2GT3RS regarding the misalignment of the car's hood and potential past damage, asking for additional details that have not yet been clarified. @Tomcat raises a caution about emissions, mentioning how the backdated exhaust will affect passing inspection, reflecting worries about the vehicle's compliance. @relax360 expresses frustration over the inaccessibility of purchasing the car due to California's stringent regulations on ROW vehicles, while @Jeep2017 and @Jtmarlin inquire about the absence of certain OEM features and safety mounting points, indicating potential disappointments for interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments praised the Ford Fusion as a great option for a first car, highlighting its suitability for reliable A-to-B transportation. @BMWE90Guy noted it is a good first car but lacks thrills, while @Calamari_Jujutsu expressed that the Fusion is underrated and praised its reliability with proper maintenance. @porsche74s appreciated the vehicle's low mileage and excellent condition, and @DMCCs echoed those sentiments, emphasizing its cleanliness and low wear.
Neutral: The seller, @Superhawk65, provided detailed responses to inquiries about the vehicle. They assured potential buyers that the recalls had been addressed and that they would bring proof from their local Ford dealer. They confirmed the car's readiness to pass California emissions inspections and committed to updating interested parties with better photographs of the undercarriage, which implies an openness to transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the number of recalls associated with the vehicle, with @bogtrotter questioning the seller's assurance of recalls being serviced. Despite the seller addressing these concerns by stating that all recalls had been taken care of, uncertainty remained until potential buyers could verify this information. Additionally, @GermanDoc pointed out an apparent misspelling on the car, which might detract from its overall presentation.
![]() |
19k-Mile 2015 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport Willys Wheeler Edition 6-Speed
1C4BJWDG4FL595927
Lot 238925
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz shares a delightful experience with their 2015 Jeep Wrangler, affectionately named Jerry, highlighting the fun they've had driving it on the trails. Meanwhile, @kjbrowne (The Seller) expresses appreciation for the interest shown in the vehicle, detailing that the Jeep has been enjoyable to drive and confirming its low mileage. In response to requests for more visuals, @kjbrowne is open to providing additional photos and videos, indicating a willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Neutral: @rdaccord inquires about the possibility of a cold start video, showing interest in the vehicle's performance but not expressing opinion on its qualities. @kjbrowne (The Seller) promptly responds that they will post the cold start video the following morning, demonstrating good communication and readiness to address buyer curiosity. They also reassure everyone that the Jeep has been reliable throughout their ownership.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their excitement and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its features such as the big block engine, 4-speed transmission, and classic bench seat. @bradsbuicks encapsulated this enthusiasm with a simple "LOVE IT!" while @Rkasz noted that the car looks fun. @MrNova praised the restoration, mentioning that it struck a good balance between originality and personalization. Overall, there's a consensus that the car is a great driver and a fantastic tribute to classic American muscle cars, with several users like @Highlander63 and @pastafagioli reminiscing about the nostalgia tied to similar vehicles from the 60s and 70s.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on the vehicle's specifications and history. @artash1 asked about the rear-end gears, prompting @Imjustacarguy (The Seller) to provide detailed technical information about the 4:10 gears and the engine's configuration. However, some comments reflected confusion about the engine's type, such as @R7K questioning the discrepancy between the valve cover labeling and the engine description. @2315Fleming also inquired about the engine's horsepower and any additional modifications, indicating that potential buyers are interested in understanding the car's performance better.
Negative: A few comments touched on concerns related to the vehicle's authenticity and performance. @WIZZZZ specifically questioned whether the car was a real SS, while @Crowmagnum remarked that although the sound was impressive, the driving video seemed underwhelming and suggested that the car should be driven harder to showcase its capabilities. There was also a hint of skepticism about the seller's story regarding the car's acquisition, as @Imjustacarguy (The Seller) shared that he received little information when purchasing it, raising questions about the vehicle's provenance and history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TammyB (The Seller) describes the vehicle as gorgeous, well-cared-for, and easy to drive, attributing its excellent condition to its life in Santa Barbara, California. She emphasizes that the car is in impressively dry condition for its age, noting there have been no fluids found underneath it, which speaks to its careful maintenance. The CA smog test was passed with flying colors, further assuring potential buyers of its reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @Tomer and @onlyoriginalcars, inquire about technical aspects of the vehicle such as the timing chain tensioners and maintenance history. @onlyoriginalcars specifically appreciates the completed CA smog test and asks for confirmation on certain details, including a photo of the hydraulic hoses and the potential need for maintenance records. @ratrodCOE raises concerns over registration details and requests clarity on temporary tags, which prompts @TammyB to explain the current registration status and the provisions for a temporary plate in California.
Negative: Some comments express concern about the lack of detailed mechanical history, particularly regarding the timing chain tensioners, which are critical for engine performance. @Tomer highlights the potential risks associated with not replacing plastic tensioners, suggesting that this is a significant maintenance concern. @ratrodCOE also seeks assurances about registration status, fearing that existing plates may not be valid, and emphasizes the importance of confirming that there are no outstanding registration fees or issues that could affect the purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Craven praises the vehicle's appearance, calling it a looker and also appreciates its overdrive feature. @lefty713 admires the paint's character and hopes the buyer maintains its current state. Additionally, @rollresistchris views the vehicle as a great base for a GT setup, highlighting its muscle car appeal in terms of comfort and aesthetics.
Neutral: @SunValleyAutos (The Seller) welcomes commenters and informs them about upcoming videos for the auction. The seller also responds to questions about the vehicle's condition, including the glove box door and trunk condition, while confirming the information regarding the transmission's history provided by @XLT97. Overall, they provide transparency about the issues related to the paint and other components.
Negative: @Habu2 humorously criticizes the vehicle's paint job, suggesting it might need to be redone, while @Governor454 expresses disappointment at the extensive use of black paint and undercoating. There are also inquiries from @Dfhodg about potential rust and the absence of the glove box door, which indicates concerns about the vehicle's preservation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's specifications and condition, calling it a 'time capsule' and a 'great spec.' @Addicted2Torque described it as 'NOS material,' while @timmclean noted its low mileage, already anticipating any inquiries regarding rod bearings. Commenters like @NiceRumble felt the car is 'EAG worthy' and praised its originality. The vehicle is seen as a rare find, with its single hump and carbon roof enhancing its appeal to potential buyers and collectors. @JT12345 remarked that this car presents an opportunity for buyers to acquire a nearly new E92 M3, highlighting its desirability.
Neutral: @SewellBMWPlano, the seller, provided a detailed history of the car, confirming it has a single owner since new and was part of BMW's European Delivery program. The car has been carefully maintained, accumulating mileage mainly during its delivery trip to the U.S. due to limited use. Although the original window sticker and service books were misplaced by the previous owner, the seller is willing to provide service history documentation. The seller also confirmed the vehicle includes two keys and has paint protection film (PPF) applied to various parts.
Negative: Conversely, several comments indicated concerns about the car being underutilized. @Max_emilio02 expressed regret about the car likely not being driven, labeling it a 'waste,' a sentiment echoed by @mcollector1 who stated that buyers typically do not purchase such pristine examples to drive regularly but rather as display items for collections. @bamiot expressed frustration over the idea that an M3, which is engineered for driving enjoyment, may remain undriven. Comments like these highlight a tension between preserving the car's low mileage and the expectation that such vehicles should be enjoyed on the road.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its appealing low mileage and overall condition. @DasGut remarks on the nice appearance of the Macan, indicating it has garnered interest due to its aesthetics. @davidtodd1 (The Seller) has actively engaged with potential buyers, providing detailed responses about the car's features, including its navigation and music capabilities through Apple CarPlay, showing a willingness to share information by offering to drop photos into the gallery for clarity.
Neutral: Some questions have arisen regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition. For instance, @MdistelBMW inquires about the PDK fluid change and whether the tires are original, while @lcdeyes asks for photos of the steering wheel without the cover and raises concerns about the car's performance. @Jjbuns looks for confirmation on the number of key fobs and whether the steering wheel is heated, demonstrating interest in functional features.
Negative: Concerns have also been expressed regarding minor imperfections and maintenance records. @MdistelBMW noted the lack of confirmation on the PDK flush, and @DasGut questioned the paint's condition and any previous body damage. Additionally, @lcdeyes highlighted the expired Porsche warranty, asking about potential transfer case issues. Finally, @nt1992 raised a concern about whether the vehicle had been smoked in, to which @davidtodd1 vehemently denied, emphasizing a strong dislike for smoking.
![]() |
29k-Mile, 6.3L LT4-Powered 1996 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe 6-Speed
1G1YY2256T5120191
Lot 238929
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the impressive condition and performance of the vehicle. @John1313 (The Seller) describes the car as "pristine and fast," noting its excellent maintenance and condition, mentioning features such as perfect paint, new tires, tight suspension, and strong engine performance that impresses everyone who sees it. Commenters, including @Icecreamconeman and @revron, also express admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance potential, indicating that it grabs attention wherever it goes and is the cleanest C4 they have seen.
Neutral: There are inquiries about the vehicle's legal status for registration in California and questions about its air conditioning system. @12JC seeks clarity about the licensing process in California, while @JosephDAZ asks about the necessary components to make the AC functional, to which @John1313 responds with information regarding part availability. Additionally, @1974pantera advises the seller to consider making the car smog-compliant to facilitate the sale, suggesting that potential buyers might hesitate due to emission concerns.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the car's modifications and registration. @1974pantera raises the issue of making the car smog-compliant to enhance its marketability, indicating that many California buyers may be wary of purchasing a non-compliant vehicle. @shawn666 also questions the need for retuning if catalytic converters are reinstalled, reflecting uncertainty about emissions compliance. Furthermore, there are indications that the need for new AC components and potential difficulties with local emissions regulations may hinder the car's desirability for some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are many enthusiastic comments praising the vehicle, highlighting its gorgeous exterior color and classic beauty. @JTM724 mentioned that the photos do not do justice to the car's stunning color, while @Peter_69 expressed admiration for the car's overall appearance. Additionally, @702e30girl noted the vehicle's timeless beauty, asserting it remains attractive even after 35 years. Furthermore, @M54sam characterized it as a dream car, appreciating its place among iconic models, and @hobbsm3 shared positive experiences with their own similar car, endorsing the enjoyment such vehicles provide.
Neutral: Several comments featured inquiries about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @Dspoljaric sought clarification from @ksthomas10 regarding the original nature of the side skirts, while @urielle questioned the sparse entries in the service booklet, prompting a detailed response from the Seller addressing maintenance records. Ultimately, @ksthomas10 reassured potential buyers, stating there have been no major repairs since their ownership and shared insights about the work conducted by skilled technicians, confirming the car's maintained condition without significant alterations.
Negative: A few concerns were raised regarding the car's condition and some aesthetic details. @sandbartender pointed out discrepancies in the trim colors, asking about the mismatch in the interior parts, while @ecv expressed frustration over the timing of their interest in the car. Additionally, @ksthomas10 acknowledged a minor flaw, mentioning a small crack in the driver-side fog light, though it functions properly. This combination of factors left some potential buyers apprehensive, weighing the desirability of the car against minor imperfections.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hostlerrich (The Seller) shares a heartfelt sentiment about the Odyssey, describing it as a nostalgic piece that has brought joy and fun to his family. He reflects on the restoration process, noting that they transformed an ’82 FL250 into an even better version than factory standard. @Brogge3 echoes this enthusiasm, calling the vehicle 'clean' and expressing that it 'rips,' demonstrating a clear appreciation for the vehicle's performance and nostalgic value.
Neutral: @Hostlerrich (The Seller) offers insight into the vehicle's condition and the care it has received through the years, including its complete disassembly and thorough restoration. He mentions that the vehicle is ready for fun in the spring and is willing to assist with shipping and storage, indicating an openness to potential buyers about logistics and support in the buying process.
Negative: There are no negative comments about the vehicle or its condition in the provided text. All feedback reflects a positive or neutral stance towards the Odyssey, showing that it has been well-received by the seller and potential buyers alike.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the car's stunning color combination and elegant design. @Craven specifically praised the smooth ride and comfort of the padded seats, while @Dollycat3 remarked on its gorgeous appearance, highlighting the striking contrast of the white exterior and black roof with red leather upholstery. @Hoppy18 and @ZR1ZR1ZR1 celebrated Cadillac's luxury with comments like 'fit for a King & Queen' and noting how well the colors work together, suggesting that this car is a beautiful and collectible classic that stands out from others.
Neutral: The seller, @VickroyEnterprises, provided detailed information about the vehicle's trim history and maintenance, addressing inquiries from potential buyers. They clarified that the car's unique Eldorado trim was a special order and shared the car's backstory, including its long-term ownership and service record. Additionally, @Ilikeallkinds, a friend of the owner, corroborated the vehicle's good maintenance with personal insights about its performance and condition, indicating it has been well cared for over the years. Comments also included discussions about features like the power vent windows and the condition of the headliner, with the seller providing photo evidence to clarify concerns.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the car's condition, particularly regarding potential bodywork issues. @Mikegrauer questioned whether there was excessive body filler behind the rear window and expressed doubts about the quality of the paint job, while also seeking clarification on the presence of rust. @UncleBaldy noted worries about the condition of the headliner, specifically asking if it sagged. Overall, while many appreciated the vehicle's aesthetics and performance, there were a few reservations regarding its restoration quality and physical condition that potential buyers should consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the Mercedes-Maybach S680 4MATIC as "such a beautiful" vehicle, highlighting its luxurious nature. @mkuehn emphasizes its bold status by stating that few current vehicles compare, while @yellowferrari77 notes its impressive specifications and powerful V12 engine, calling it a 'real boss car.' @Fairmont663336 appreciates its all-wheel drive feature as a decent option for winter driving.
Neutral: @lasvegasmotorcars (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding document fees, clarifying that the $295 fee applies only to Nevada residents registering the vehicle and that out-of-state buyers will receive title and transfer documents. @Pennoak inquires about the availability of an extended warranty, to which @lasvegasmotorcars responds that it can be purchased through a Mercedes-Benz dealer since the original warranty is still valid. As the auction nears its end, @lasvegasmotorcars reminds potential bidders to ensure their credit cards are in good standing to facilitate a smooth bidding process.
Negative: @gelles expresses skepticism about individuals not knowing their credit cards were expired, questioning the bidding process on Bring a Trailer (BaT) and suggesting that valid cards are required for bidding. @lasvegasmotorcars (The Seller) recounts a previous experience where two bidders were unable to finalize their bids due to expired cards, further raising concerns about bidder awareness and preparedness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments indicate a sense of enthusiasm and engagement from the community regarding the vehicle, particularly noted by @Alex_L, who is actively promoting the auction and eager to answer inquiries from potential bidders. Commenters such as @E28E34 highlight unique features of the vehicle, such as foglight washers and the distinct specifications of the Canadian version, adding to its allure. The nostalgia expressed by @JGraham regarding the color Fjord blue further adds a sentimental touch to the discourse, enhancing the appeal of the car among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss technical aspects of the engine blocks, mentioning the distinction between Alusil and Nikasil blocks. @kzcan provides personal experience with the Alusil block, while @JGraham presents a pragmatic view on the relevance of this distinction given the car's age. Additionally, inquiries about the vehicle's ride height from @anthonyjp suggest a common concern among prospective buyers that could influence their decision-making process.
Negative: There are some concerns regarding the car's history and condition, as raised by commenters like @1983533i2003Z4, who question if the vehicle has undergone extensive repainting. @BiggStigg's humorous apprehension regarding the potential for a manual transmission suggests a perceived undesirability for some buyers. Furthermore, discussions around tariffs on Canadian vehicles raised by @NVavaris indicate external factors that may complicate the sale, potentially detracting from the car's overall market appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @rpmf08 expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its great appearance and the presence of turbo wheels and racing style seats, while @fitzpatrick appreciated the car's history of being well enjoyed and requested details on its maintenance records. @Tennktm labeled it a potentially good daily driver, and @mdu911sc referred to it as a Launch Edition, highlighting its full leather and sport seats as appealing features.
Neutral: @Fargie asked about the seat operation and whether the seller has the original seats available, also inquiring about bore score and steering condition. @EnglishRich (The Seller) responded, confirming that the carbon seats are genuine Porsche and provided details regarding the car's service history, stating it was serviced regularly at a Porsche dealership and locally. Additionally, @TTtwist_97 requested information about maintenance details such as coil packs and fuel injector servicing, to which the seller provided explanations regarding previous work done without claiming the car had ever been tracked.
Negative: @Fargie expressed concern about potential rust issues due to the car's location and age, questioning the impact of salt on the vehicle. @02silverbullet raised issues regarding the car's Carfax entries and possible emissions problems, while another comment indicates the presence of expired tags despite the owner clarifying that new tags were not issued by the DMV. @sta11ion noted logistical issues in obtaining the vehicle due to its location, wishing it was available in Canada.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's performance and modifications. For instance, @tcspeed praised the car as a true modern driver's vehicle, noting its comfort and fun driving experience at a competitive price. @og-pinion appreciated the seller's decision to drive the car, which aligns with its design, and remarked that the modifications made were personally desirable, suggesting the car embodies great reliability and spirit. @slay2025 also acknowledged the car's impressive sound and the fun driving experience it offers.
Neutral: The seller, @KGEBE, provided information about the original components included in the sale, such as the exhaust and headers. They also engaged constructively with potential buyers, addressing their requests for specific reports and photos. @ChrisCOak and @Tom78737 inquired about additional documentation like the DME report and window sticker, showing interest in detailed information about the vehicle's condition, while others like @Best_Of_Show suggested that obtaining a DME report could enhance buyer confidence and potentially lead to higher bids.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding the lack of a DME report, which is often considered essential for high-value sports cars. @nickgdrives and @CSquared450 specifically highlighted the importance of a DME report in assessing the vehicle's history and performance, especially with modifications made. @KGEBE responded defensively, indicating their unwillingness to pursue such a report, which led to mixed feelings among potential bidders about the car's reliability and operational history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments from enthusiasts reflect a strong admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its unique style and the upgrades made to it. @skyline, mentioned for their engaging style, and @EdmontonCarGuy, who noted the car's peaky engine, both express excitement over its performance, especially at high revs. There are also indications of the rarity of this 1976 Nissan Skyline, as @CarCaveSRQ (The Seller) emphasized how well sorted and driver-focused the car is, with significant attention given to details such as its cold A/C and impressive upgrades that cater to daily driving. Other commenters, such as @Tahoe013, also conveyed their appreciation by stating, "What a great build! Love everything about it."
Neutral: Several commenters offered insights that were more informational or inquisitive than overtly positive or negative. For instance, @leo23k raised questions about discrepancies in the vehicle's mileage history, recalling earlier listings that showed a higher mileage. @RayJDM requested additional photos and details about the vehicle's condition, particularly mentioning areas like the undercarriage and gauge functionality. The seller, @CarCaveSRQ, responded to these inquiries by clarifying the situation regarding mileage and confirming the presence of minor rust, which was previously indicated. This exchange reflects a mix of interest along with the practical considerations that come with purchasing such a vintage car.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the vehicle's condition. @learning2 expressed disappointment regarding visible rust underneath the car, while @leo23k questioned the accuracy of previous advertisements that claimed the undercarriage was clean. @RayJDM also pointed out potential issues regarding the gauges and other missing interior pieces. Additionally, commenters like @LongDucDong noted that while they found the overall vehicle appealing, they pointed out what they perceived as odd placements of the oil and water temperature gauges. Overall, these comments highlighted some hesitance in fully endorsing the vehicle due to its rust and certain areas needing further clarification.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @Geppetto1 calling it a "nice custom" and others like @GSX223 and @LoudNotFast finding it "very cool" and "wicked". @JGraham was particularly impressed, referring to the build as super cool and noting the excitement of a 125cc engine on a bicycle frame. Many also requested updates or additional content, such as videos, to showcase its performance, indicating enthusiasm and interest in the vehicle's capabilities.
Neutral: Several users asked practical questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and component sourcing. @pharmrxdad inquired about the engine's origin and mounting, to which the seller, @BlueChipCar, clarified details about the motor being a Loncin. Other comments from @Hillcountryflight and @German66 focused on part replacements and the vehicle's battery placement, suggesting the need for further information about maintenance and parts availability. This indicates a thoughtful consideration of ownership responsibilities among potential buyers.
Negative: On the downside, some comments expressed concerns about safety and practicality. @LoudNotFast mentioned the vehicle's potential dangers, while @a990dna humorously suggested it might not be well-received by neighbors, comparing it to a mini-Speedway bike. @Rowdyroyce mentioned hesitance due to age-related safety considerations. Additionally, @david_C suggested it resembled a BMX bike with a motor, potentially downplaying its uniqueness or functionality, which could affect its appeal to more serious buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their love for the vehicle, noting its interesting history and original features. @longboardguy shared a personal connection, reminiscing about family trips in a similar MG, and he sees this car as a beloved family member. @GregSeifert added that this car represents a true MG experience and would provide excellent driving joy, emphasizing the smiles it could bring.
Neutral: Several users requested additional media to better assess the car's condition. @Techronflier asked for photos of the top and tonneau cover, while @JouJou and @Dbran6172 both suggested the need for startup and driving videos to enhance the auction appeal. @MG1955 (The Seller) confirmed that more photos and videos would be provided shortly, indicating a willingness to accommodate potential buyers' requests.
Negative: Conversely, some comments pointed to the quality of the current photos and the lack of detailed videos as a concern. @morganplus8 and @billyblyth criticized the inadequate representation, suggesting that better visuals could help in showcasing the car's true state. @morganplus8 specifically expressed surprise that the auction platform allowed such poor-quality photos, hinting at the importance of proper presentation in auctions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @FrankJacobus has provided thorough responses to inquiries about the vehicle's condition, emphasizing that it has been well-maintained and regularly used. The canvas top is in great condition, opens smoothly, and includes a top cover and tool kit. Maintenance records are fully documented, with the A/C blowing cold and no leaky seals found. Videos have been uploaded showcasing the engine startup and operation of the top, demonstrating transparency regarding the vehicle's performance for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several commentors have asked for more details, including undercarriage photos, service records, clarification on color discrepancies, and recent maintenance receipts. @LABLUE expressed a desire for videos showing the car's electrical components in action, while @Twelvepaws and @CentralOregon raised valid questions about tire dates and potential wear, indicating their interest in understanding the full history of the vehicle. The engagement reflects a thorough due diligence process typical in such transactions.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the car's maintenance history and the lack of service since 2022, as mentioned by @LABLUE. @CentralOregon also expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's low mileage and the circumstances surrounding the clutch replacement. Additionally, questions about why the CARFAX report ended in 2022 and did not reflect the car's status in Pennsylvania indicate a need for clearer communication regarding the vehicle's ownership and service history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rhya praised the vehicle as a very nice Chevelle, while @JayKay2430 highlighted the great power upgrade from the original L48 350 engine to a more powerful configuration. @stugottz expressed admiration for the Chevelle equipped with a 454 engine and a 5-speed transmission, indicating that it certainly captured their attention. Additionally, @ssterry found the Chevelle to be beautiful and acknowledged the value of a well-documented build regarding its market worth.
Neutral: Several comments focused on inquiries and requests for more details about the vehicle. @IBE555666 asked about viewing the car, and @ssterry prompted the seller for undercarriage shots to assess the car's condition better. @FLAutoSales (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the lack of undercarriage photos and mentioned a binder full of receipts for the build but could not disclose personal details. @Al_Loco offered a suggestion on how to present receipts to potential buyers, showing an interest in the technical details of the vehicle's modifications.
Negative: There were some concerns and confusion regarding the photo visibility of the vehicle, as noted by @SMZ027 who pointed out issues with not being able to see pictures. @ssterry questioned whether the conversion to a 454 and a 5-speed transmission would increase its value, expressing that while intrigued, they needed to see how the market responds. @Intimidator04 suggested changing some aspects of the car, indicating a desire for modifications even though they acknowledged the high-quality build.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Guiderent13 praised the previous experience dealing with @aegmotorsports (The Seller) while buying a Scion iQ, noting it was just as described and a fun driving experience. @Blackbelt mentioned that the car has been surprisingly enjoyable to drive despite initial considerations, highlighting its exceptional handling, decent power, good economy, and the solid quality typically expected from Toyota vehicles. Additionally, @JohnnyK shared that owning an iQ brings a smile whenever he drives it, suggesting modifications like adding a TRD rear sway bar enhance the driving experience, and expressed appreciation for Toyota's engineering on the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments revealed that owners and potential buyers have varying preferences regarding this type of vehicle. @KROD expressed a preference for the Aston Martin Cygnet over the iQ, while @mr_smee acknowledged the power of the car noting its 94 HP, which leads to fun, albeit not extremely fast, driving. Several comments also discussed specific features of the car such as its 0-60 time and turning radius, indicating a general understanding that the vehicle is suited for city driving but lacks high-speed performance.
Negative: Some comments reflected a mix of humor and skepticism regarding the vehicle's passenger capacity. @Mordizzle joked about already owning a small 'IQ', hinting that they aren't particularly interested in this vehicle. @Uby67vw1958 inquired about only receiving one key fob, which could suggest a concern regarding the completeness of the vehicle's accessories. Additionally, @neilpierson25 noted that the term "quirky" was seemingly tailored for the iQ, possibly implying a critical perspective on its unique design aesthetics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commentors expressed admiration for the RS6, highlighting its capabilities and enjoyable driving experience. @gregoryindiana noted that the RS6 makes long trips easy and enjoyable, while @biggoosht shared fond memories of their own RS6, comparing its performance favorably to a 996 Turbo. @Clockwerks remarked on the joy of driving their manual swapped RS6, indicating that the vehicle can still be a delight with the right modifications.
Neutral: The discussion also touched on the maintenance and upgrades related to the RS6. @Intense275 (The Seller) provided details about recent services, including timing belt and DRC systems replacements, and confirmed that the car has extensive service records. Commentors like @AZ-Collections and @karluv2000 raised questions about visual discrepancies in the photos and potential previous accidents, demonstrating a keen interest in the car's history and current condition. Many participants shared experiences regarding the challenges and costs of servicing specific components, such as the oil cooler pipe and suspension systems.
Negative: Concerns about potential issues with the RS6 were raised, particularly surrounding the reliability of the DRC suspension and transmission components. @gregoryindiana highlighted the known weaknesses in these areas, warning that a failing DRC might be inevitable given the car's age. @HanMan echoed similar sentiments about high maintenance costs, and a few users voiced skepticism about the mechanical difficulties of maintaining such a performance vehicle, with @biggoosht mentioning the multitude of quirks that can detract from the experience. This skepticism suggests a cautious approach to prospective buyers, noting that while the car has potential, the ownership experience may require substantial commitment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @dyschlee expressed appreciation for the thoroughness of the oil change receipts provided by @gabriellegcampbell, noting that the oil change intervals were generally between 6,500 to 10,000 miles, which suggests a good maintenance routine. There is positive sentiment around the vehicle being previously owned by @gabriellegcampbell's mother, as @dyschlee emphasized liking the fact that she drove an STI.
Neutral: @dyschlee asked important questions regarding the vehicle's lien status and requested more pictures of a minor dent mentioned in the car's details. The inquiry about the extent of damage that led to repairs in 2024 shows a neutral stance as they are gathering more information before forming a judgment.
Negative: @dyschlee highlighted potential concerns regarding the oil change record intervals and the need for additional documentation to prove consistent maintenance, which could suggest doubts about the vehicle's upkeep. While @gabriellegcampbell confirmed there is no lien on the car, addressing previous damage caused by backing into a garage may raise uncertainty for potential buyers about the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @TBrez (The Seller) presents the SSR as an exceptionally well-cared-for vehicle, stored in a temperature-controlled environment with only 995 original miles. He emphasizes its like-new condition, showcasing factory line marks and stickers in the underside photos. Commenters like @66gal also praise the low mileage and the overall beauty of the truck, showing enthusiasm for the sale and confidence in its quality.
Neutral: Comments reflect a mix of curiosity and concern regarding the vehicle's condition. @JustJed questions the wear on the driver's seat despite the low miles, while @CadillacBob1968 shares a personal observation about similar seat wrinkles in other SSRs, suggesting that this may not be an uncommon feature. @gunnison mentions passing on another low-mile SSR, indicating there is interest in such vehicles but also highlights the competitive nature of sales in this niche market.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the vehicle's cleanliness, particularly by @TJMONEYBAGS, who notes the presence of grease and grime on the rear axle, which seems inconsistent with the claimed mileage. This raises doubts about the legitimacy of the low-mile assertion. Both @JustJed and @TJMONEYBAGS express skepticism, suggesting there may be discrepancies between the seller's claims and the vehicle's actual condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @01996tt expresses excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its beautiful condition and suggesting it will thrive in the summer season. @billyblyth notes that this model offers a rare genuine six-speed experience, making it a fantastic driver that requires real driving engagement. @greenerdays11 (The Seller) describes the car as an 'absolute stud' and confirms that the odometer issue has been satisfactorily clarified with CarFax, affirming the mileage accuracy.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @lesr3204 and @wsf80, inquire about specific modifications and performance details, such as horsepower and conversion documentation, showing interest in the vehicle's history. @kmarku and @fargie ask about the integrity of the vehicle, including coolant lines and emissions compliance. @greenerdays11 (The Seller) responds with assurances about the car's condition and service history, further engaging the community with updates on the necessary reports and documentation.
Negative: Concerns have been raised regarding the previous odometer discrepancy and the need for thorough documentation. @bmdaia mentions the slow nature of getting accurate records from CarFax while @dukay and @wirobins express hesitation about confirming modifications and obtaining a DME report. @Pacificinn worries about a recorded minor accident and requests paint readings, indicating uncertainty about the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @nctonyi praises the vehicle for its beauty and powerful engine, highlighting the incredible driving experience it offers, both in terms of speed and luxury. They express confidence that the future owner will be thrilled with their purchase, wishing them good luck. Additionally, @Closer_2001 commends the car for its excellent presentation and specifications, adding their wishes for a successful sale.
In a detailed response, @TonyBMWStrong (The Seller) outlines the car's features, including a clarification on the K&N sticker representing air filters and the OEM status of the Pro CF spoiler. They also mention that the Black Sapphire Metallic paint can be challenging to maintain but looks stunning at sunset, expressing pride in the car's visual appeal while acknowledging the need for paint correction due to high pollen during the photo shoot. Another positive aspect mentioned is the inclusion of genuine, unused floor mats, further emphasizing the car's well-maintained condition.
Neutral: @Joe-BMW, a fellow M550 owner, complements the car's appearance and asks questions regarding specific features like the K&N sticker and the spoiler's origin. They also note that the car could benefit from paint correction and ceramic coating, which is a common maintenance aspect for black cars. @TonyBMWStrong (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, elaborating on the air filter details and confirming that the spoiler was installed at the dealership, while also softening the concerns about the paint due to environmental factors noted during the photography.
Negative: The seller acknowledges the challenges faced with the Black Sapphire Metallic paint, referring to it as a 'nightmare' regarding maintenance, particularly in contrast to how it appears in different lighting conditions. This realistic view on the car's finish highlights a potential downside for prospective buyers, especially regarding upkeep. However, @TonyBMWStrong (The Seller) firmly reassures interested parties that the vehicle has been garage-kept, never winter-driven, and meticulously maintained, indicating a lack of major issues despite the minor aesthetic concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed nostalgia and appreciation for the 1997 Chrysler Town and Country LXi AWD. @DC_MotorWerks (The Seller) highlighted the vehicle's one-owner history and fond memories associated with this model. The vehicle was described as beautiful and functional, with one user, @Craven, stating it was more useful than many SUVs. The seller reinforced that the van had new tires and was freshly serviced, making it ready for numerous miles ahead. Several commenters shared their positive experiences with similar models, reminiscing about childhood memories and how reliable these vans can be, reflecting the overall enthusiasm for the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral comments inquired about the vehicle's condition and performance. User @million2one asked about operational issues, specifically rust and interior odors, demonstrating a cautious interest in the van's integrity for potential long journeys. The seller promptly reassured them, noting there was no rust and the rearview mirror had a minor issue which had been disclosed. @cdwatnsu and others sought clarification on the transmission performance and sound, acknowledging potential quirks of the vehicle while discussing past experiences with similar models. The comments suggest a balance of interest and concern regarding the vehicle’s functionality and relatively uncommon driving characteristics of that era.
Negative mentions revolved around the concerns over the Haldex AWD system and the notorious transmission issues that have plagued Chrysler vehicles of this generation. @bogtrotter asked specifically about problems with the AWD system due to the difficulty in sourcing parts, indicating a sense of caution among potential buyers. @19seventy3vette shared a personal experience about needing a transmission replacement at a specific mileage, which mirrors an underlying worry about long-term reliability for these models. Despite the mostly positive sentiment, these comments highlighted the critical knowledge potential buyers should consider when evaluating the vehicle's longevity and performance history.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the positive aspects of the vehicle, particularly its rarity and technical specifications. @Jamesss mentions that their 2008 3.2 6MT model has been a joy to drive, stressing the enjoyment factor of this specific model. The seller, @BlueChipCar, expresses confidence in the vehicle's appeal, stating that it is a rare 6-speed manual TT that will bring happiness to its next owner. They also invite potential bidders to reach out with questions and showcase their willingness to provide more information, which is seen positively by the commenters.
Neutral: Various commenters seek more technical details and maintenance history, such as @Onesicksupra's inquiry about the new clutch, brakes, and the condition of the tires. @AUDIologist and @DSS10 request additional images and diagnostics to gauge the vehicle's condition, especially concerning the airbag light and potential fluid leaks. @M125X250 raises a question about the car's 7-year period of inactivity, with @BlueChipCar explaining its limited mileage since 2019, suggesting that it might be a collector's vehicle rather than a daily driver.
Negative: On the negative side, there's concern regarding the vehicle’s maintenance history and existing issues. @AudiCowboy points out a significant 7-year gap in the Carfax report, which raises questions about the vehicle's past. Both @DSS10 and @AUDIologist express unease about the airbag light being on without clear explanations or service history related to it. Additionally, requests for detailed inspections and measurements, such as the timing chain values, imply that potential buyers might perceive a lack of transparency in the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many users expressed admiration for the vehicle's impressive design and capabilities. @boaboyoz described it as an 'incredible and impeccable Motorhome' and praised the build quality, while @Andy_george noted the great chassis and features like the large generator and Aqua Hot system. @Dollycat3 called it 'absolutely phenomenal' and 'the nicest, most purposeful' vehicle he had seen, highlighting the vehicle's suitability for camping and recreational activities.
Neutral: Several comments reflected a mix of curiosity and suggestions for improvements. @ManyTrailers suggested a design alteration to enhance garage space for car storage, indicating a willingness to compromise on living space. @hooper inquired about the weight capacity of the garage lift, showing interest in the vehicle's functionality. There were also conversations around the vehicle's existing warranties, with @Zachgraham asking detailed questions supporting the seller's transparent responses about warranty specifics.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's pricing and features. @Freddyg123 expressed disappointment, stating he had expected a larger garage for cars, while others like @m60 commented on the absence of features such as graphics which some might consider unappealing. Overall, while there was considerable interest, potential buyers also had reservations about value for money and expectations regarding the vehicle's functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle for its stunning aesthetics and condition. @gscharnagl expressed admiration for the smoke silver exterior paired with a beige interior, calling it a beauty and a stunner from @michaelmotorcar. @SirMercsALot remarked on how the car resembles a brand new model, specifically highlighting its inline six engine as a desirable feature. @Schmidlack appreciated the understated and timeless quality of the Mercedes-Benz E320, reminiscing about his own experience with the coupe version and praising its beautiful interior materials.
Neutral: @michaelmotorcar shared details about the car's limited mileage of only 44,000 and its history with the original owner, providing a thorough overview of the vehicle's attributes. He mentioned recent service work done on the car costing $2500, ensuring potential bidders that the car runs excellently. There were also inquiries from potential buyers, such as @garp1234, who sought clarity about the condition and date of the tires, which @michaelmotorcar confirmed are from 2017 but appear nearly new, indicating transparency in the vehicle’s maintenance.
Negative: However, there were concerns regarding the vehicle’s service history; @TolucaLake noted the absence of information about the bio-degradable engine wiring harness and requested clarification on whether it has been replaced. Additionally, @michaelmotorcar disclosed difficulties in obtaining service records from the original owner due to personal circumstances, which raised questions among potential bidders about the car's complete service history and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are expressing admiration for the vehicle's condition, with @Assam stating they love it and wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @Mulefan3220 also comments positively on the appearance of the XJ and highlights the added benefit of the 8.25 rear end, indicating it as a significant feature. Furthermore, @Trust-in-the-Machine praises the XJ's cleanliness and shares a personal sentiment about wishing the seller would keep it, which further emphasizes the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: The seller, @clm69, provides detailed information about the vehicle's history, including purchase details, maintenance records, and modifications made over the years. This transparency gives potential buyers a solid understanding of the vehicle's upkeep and the reason for selling, which is that it has become a non-essential personal vehicle amidst a larger collection. The seller's willingness to allow inspections reflects a commitment to trust and transparency in the sale process.
Negative: There are no explicit negative comments found in the provided discussion. The overall sentiment seems positive or neutral, with no criticism of the vehicle or its sale being mentioned. No complaints or concerns were raised by the commenters.
![]() |
2003 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 50th Anniversary Edition
1G1YY32G035131050
Lot 238826
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @JohnF1966 appreciates the vehicle, noting that at 73,000 miles and 23 years old, it appears cosmetically sound enough to serve as a nice daily driver. They suggest the owner should drive it and enjoy it rather than worry about its collector value, which might be less significant given its mileage. Additionally, @Viggen (The Seller) confirms that the car comes with a hardtop and stowage rack, responding to inquiries positively and with detailed information about the car's specifications and features.
Neutral: @Longmire45 asks about any potential issues with the gear shifter, expressing curiosity about whether the problems were exclusive to the C6 automatics. @SoGi inquires about the condition of the shocks, sharing their past experience with a similar vehicle and suggesting the seller post more pictures for better assessment. @johnjm also engages in conversation by confirming that GM did not provide a factory hardtop for this model and asking if there are any markings on the hardtop, demonstrating a shared interest in the vehicle's history.
Negative: @jeller6750 critiques the quality of the vehicle's photos, suggesting they fall short of the expectations set by Bring A Trailer and hinting that AI-generated images would provide better clarity. @SoGi raises concerns about potential leakage from the shocks based on their previous experience with a similar car, pointing towards a part of the vehicle that may require attention. Furthermore, @Viggen (The Seller) mentions that some rear shocks show signs of leakage, albeit suggesting they might have been replaced at this mileage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Lord_Fetta describes the 1999 Mercedes SL500 as a stunning example of automotive preservation, boasting an ultra-rare, nearly museum-quality condition with just under 11,000 original miles. Commenters like @EdmontonCarGuy and @whipcity76 praise the car's gorgeous color combination and the extensive service history, highlighting the attention to detail and care that has gone into maintaining it. Enthusiasts agree this model represents a sound investment, with @ispendallmymoneyoncars stating the car might list for around $99,995 if it were in a dealership, given its impressive pedigree and low mileage.
Neutral: Comments from @quickmath and @whipcity76 express some reservations regarding the car's long-term standing due to its limited use. @quickmath inquiries about the vehicle’s drivability and wear on rubber parts, particularly the hydraulic top, while @whipcity76 suggests checking the top hydraulic cylinders. @Lord_Fetta reassures potential bidders by stating the vehicle has been regularly driven and maintained, further providing transparent information about its condition, including undercarriage photos and videos to ensure confidence in its quality.
Negative: Concerns arise from @carstruck, who requests more detailed photos of the chassis for a thorough assessment, indicating a caution among potential buyers regarding unseen damage. @whipcity76 raises questions about possible cosmetic wear, mentioning inconsistencies in the photos that could show signs of damage, and @Joeybenz requests paint measurements to ensure authenticity. Some skepticism persists about the overall condition of a car that has been stored rather than regularly used, raising doubts about certain components that may have deteriorated over time.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters generally express admiration for the vehicle's color and aesthetics, with @car-collector highlighting their love for the color and acknowledging the frequent ownership as typical for exotic cars. @IndianWells mentions a positive past experience with a vehicle in the same color. @FirstClassExotics emphasizes that the vehicle has recently received maintenance checks and oil changes, stating that it drives smoothly and is in great condition, which reassures potential buyers about its reliability.
Neutral: There are also neutral comments focusing on inquiries about the vehicle's history and specifications. @michaelcarney raises concerns about the number of previous owners but receives reassurance from @FirstClassExotics that this is common in the exotic car market. @car-collector requests information about the car's provenance and tire age, indicating a sensible interest in vehicle history rather than outright rejection of the car.
Negative: On the downside, not all comments are purely positive, as @Starkermann expresses concern over the mileage and suggests that the vehicle could be out of warranty. There are hints of skepticism regarding the vehicle's reliability with its higher mileage compared to the average. Additionally, @Mainlymuscle comments that while they appreciate the vehicle's appearance, they personally would not choose that color for a Bentley GTC, showing a preference discrepancy.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed a lot of enthusiasm for the vehicle's appearance, particularly its vibrant color. @Maui944 praised the color when polished, and @BeachBoy18 was captivated by the overall beauty of the car, especially the interior. @Dfount gave a shout-out to the dealership, highlighting their positive experience and urging others to bid with confidence, indicating a strong trust in the seller's integrity and service quality. Additionally, @Spokayman noted that the paint color Cyclamen Red has a unique and rare appeal, enhancing the car's value.
Neutral: Several comments brought up factual observations about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @leftlane11 pointed out the lack of recent maintenance records, particularly concerning the age of the timing belt. @Eblesson speculated on potential costs for updating the interior, aligning with @Airworm's concerns about the seat color mismatch. @Rbdaman asked for clarification about the convertible top's operation, showing concern for functionality without being overly negative about the car's appeal. @1lotus1 inquired about original images of the interior, reflecting a common interest in maintaining authenticity.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there were criticisms concerning the vehicle's interior modifications and maintenance. @Spokayman noted the conflict between the bright red quilted inserts and the exterior, suggesting that the next owner might need to replace the interior. @GaryCase asked specifically about maintenance records, to which the seller @fiminod acknowledged the absence of documentation, which could be a red flag for potential buyers. @Eblesson expressed disappointment regarding the interior quality and outlined possible costs for updates, indicating that while the car may be visually appealing, it might require significant investment to meet expectations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Caymanorcarrera praises the vehicle as the final model of the base manual 986 and expresses that it embodies all the excitement a sports car should have, while also loving the specific wheels on the car. @eknightBAT points out the advantage of the car having only two owners, which is seen as a positive aspect. Additionally, @AustinAlfisti describes the car as lovely and acknowledges the seller as a great guy, encouraging others to purchase it. @texasew supports this sentiment by asserting that both the seller and the car are trustworthy and recommending bidders to do so with confidence.
Neutral: @Lefthand750 raises an important inquiry about the condition of the IMS bearing, which is a factor many potential buyers consider. @wslehman questions the seller's confidence in the IMS bearing, asking what evidence supports its condition. @Deamon, a prospective bidder, shares his enthusiasm for the vehicle but admits he is not very knowledgeable about cars, highlighting that he has been observing auctions for a while.
Negative: @Mr_Freezee brings attention to a technician's note that mentions possible oil seeping from the RMS or IMS, expressing concern about whether any action has been taken to address this issue. @Rich_but_not_wealthy notes the conditions of the brakes, hinting that there might be some uncertainty regarding the overall maintenance. While @Deamon expresses optimism about the car's value potentially reaching higher bids, the apprehension from @Lefthand750 and @wslehman indicates a level of hesitation about the vehicle's condition that could affect bidding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments reflect a positive sentiment towards the vehicle, noting its unique color and overall condition. @Broovy appreciates the inclusion of the original wheels, while @DakarYellow finds the vintage BMW CCA grill badge a cool addition. @Mikeb57 expresses a strong interest in the car, describing it as a nice car that looks to be a late 72 model and appreciating its aesthetic. @Iwest finds the striking color beautiful and well-suited for the car, emphasizing its eye-catching quality. Additionally, @DaddyAzzy praises the car's nice condition and cool vibe, highlighting its unique nature.
Neutral: Some comments present neutral observations that are more fact-based than opinionated. @paulkopeikin questions the timing of the vehicle's relisting, indicating a curiosity about the situation. @JLB2002TII seeks clarification about the original paint and rust, while @2002driver requests a specific photo of the spare wheel well. There are also discussions about mileage and the car's history, with @ekimp noting the uncertainty surrounding the odometer reading. @Hywyflyr expresses a need for more undercar photos, stating that the work orders show the car spent time in Alaska, which raises questions about its condition.
Negative: There is a significant amount of skepticism regarding the originality of the paint used on the vehicle. @ekimp and @JKB4 both express doubts, suggesting that the color seems off compared to what is typically expected from original paint, with @ekimp highlighting visible issues like orange peel. @bmwguy323 asserts that the color does not match their experience with original Malaga paint, further feeding into the doubt. Comments about minor rust spots, as pointed out by @fordfiesta, add to the negative sentiment surrounding the car's condition. Additionally, @Bajasur suggests that paint meter readings could help settle the debate over the authenticity of the paint, indicating dissatisfaction with the ongoing discussion.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's quality and condition. @Mattyrado complimented the truck's appearance and inquired about any issues the seller faced after purchasing it, which @cdalee440 confirmed the truck has been perfect and all features work well. @TSMiller described it as a perfect truck, while @Insseeme echoed this sentiment by remarking that it looks great. @MaxsEagles specifically noted the locking rear differential as a valuable feature, further emphasizing the truck's desirability and premium value.
Neutral: Comments from various users sought clarification or additional details about the vehicle. @billybob99 asked if there was a spray-in bedliner under the plastic liner, to which @cdalee440 replied affirmatively and provided further details about the truck's features. @BensonHeel inquired about the original radio, and @MaxsEagles requested a picture of the glove box VIN codes. @cdalee440 responded promptly to these inquiries, demonstrating that many potential buyers were enthusiastic about the features and specifications of the truck.
Negative: A few comments expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's marketability. @Doug6zj9 raised a question about why people would buy such a truck but not keep it, suggesting a potential concern about buyer commitment. Additionally, @Bt8897 was concerned about the possibility of cigarette odors in the interior, prompting @cdalee440 to assert that there are no foul odors or signs of smoking present, further addressing buyer apprehensions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express excitement and appreciation for the John Deere Model A. @Mouse51 describes the vehicle's front end as 'impressive', indicating a positive impression. @Littlehorse reminisces about his family's history with similar models, including an anecdote about a picture taken when he was three, which adds a nostalgic and positive sentiment towards the vehicle's legacy. The seller, @gs1M, mentions moving the John Deere A to a big shop and shows pride in the vehicle by sharing photos, showcasing a positive and enthusiastic attitude.
Neutral: Commenters share informative exchanges about the John Deere Model A. @KIH notes the similarity of his machine and asks about the two-lever transmission, revealing curiosity about the features of the model. @gs1M provides information in response, clarifying that the company transitioned to a square axle housing in 1950, providing helpful context without overt sentiment. The interactions among bidders also reflect a neutral tone, mainly focused on logistics and inquiries about the vehicle as @gs1M invites more questions from potential buyers.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the John Deere Model A in the provided interactions. The dialogues remain constructive, and the comments do not express any dissatisfaction or negativity towards the vehicle or the selling process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, with @Rockofages calling it the "most beautiful one" they have seen and @porkpiehat stating they love everything about it, especially the green leather interior. @WEM highlighted how the new photos showcase the vehicle's adventure potential, while @AH_Chummy shared their positive experience as a Healey Saloon owner, noting the attention it draws and the enjoyment it brings while driving. @MarkS remarked on the car's unique proportions and described it as a quintessential piece of English eccentricity, wishing the future owner plenty of fun, whether at the Mille Miglia or just for local drives.
Neutral: @YvesPGB (The Seller) provided details of the vehicle's specifications, including an engine rebuild with high-quality parts, and shared information about the car's historical value, positioning it as a potential entry for enthusiasts wishing to participate in significant events like the Mille Miglia. The seller acknowledged that while the car may not have the same extensive history as comparable models sold at auctions, its condition and craftsmanship make it a unique offering in the market. Commenters like @mbaum and @Yves discussed the comparative history of Healey cars, weighing their values and potential in the collector market, while @1porsche_geek remarked on the vehicle's historical documentation on BaT.
Negative: Some commenters questioned the market value of the vehicle, with @YvesPGB noting previous feedback suggesting it may not meet the seller's expectations. @speedforreal asked pointed questions about specific engine modifications, seeking clarification on performance benefits, indicating a desire for more technical understanding. @mbaum pointed out the differences in provenance between this Healey and higher-priced models, suggesting that the current valuation might not be justified without significant historical backing. Concerns were raised about the vehicle's overall appeal compared to other more storied Healeys, suggesting a potential struggle to meet reserve prices at auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters, including @maxxfish7 and @DogHigh, rave about the vehicle’s stunning interior design, with comments like "That interior RULES!!!" and "Came for the interior. Was not disappointed 😮💨". Users like @puck5862 highlight specific elements, such as the unique tartan gear shift boot, calling it 'sic'. The enthusiasm for its aesthetics extends to the overall iconic status of the car, as noted by @Super7Driver who declares it 'iconic', and @Tyracious who sees it as 'the car of the future' from a stylistic standpoint.
Neutral: Several users were interested in the vehicle's condition and service history, with @oasis1 and @twhclassics asking about engine work records and undercarriage pictures, respectively. @eberin shared technical insights on the AC installation and confirmed the car's model year, while @JiminRichmond and @Fridge commented on the car's handling and its need for specific upgrades. Questions about modifications and component replacements also surfaced, such as the timing belt and cooling system, inviting more in-depth discussion about the vehicle's care and history.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle’s lack of AC, with multiple users expressing the necessity for this feature, particularly in hotter climates like Miami, as mentioned by @CarNutMiami. @cwood13 pointed out the frequent challenge of replacing the cam drive belt, expressing frustration over maintenance needs. Additionally, @dahli noted potential oversights in the seller's video documentation, criticizing its effectiveness, thus contributing to a mixed reception. The original gauges and air conditioning questions also suggest lingering dissatisfaction with modifications and parts availability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Mrdougie commented on the car's beautiful color, despite expressing hesitance about wanting to be seen driving it. He still acknowledges it as a very nice vehicle and wishes everyone good luck. Additionally, @TheBaptisteCollection shared a personal experience with an Artura in Tokyo Cyan, praising its jaw-dropping appearance, asserting that pictures do not do it justice. @boaboyoz also chimed in, expressing admiration by calling it a magnificent McLaren GT and wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @KLDELONG (The Seller) provided information about the vehicle's condition and maintenance. He mentioned purchasing it from McLaren Tampa Bay in February 2022 as a second owner and highlighted the car's care—being wrapped in PPF, given a ceramic coating, and stored in a climate-controlled environment. He clarified recent questions about the aftermarket spoiler and the electrochromic roof, confirming they can be easily managed and emphasized the importance of preserving the car's condition. @gelles raised a concern regarding the Carfax color discrepancy, asking why it lists the titles as black.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the accuracy of some technical details, notably regarding the front brakes, with @RenegadeRoller pointing out that they are actually six piston calipers while the rear has four. @MGVII inquired about the aftermarket spoiler removal process, revealing potential uncertainty about modifications made to the vehicle. Additionally, @blam23 questioned whether the vehicle had an electrochromic roof, to which @KLDELONG informed that it did not, mentioning reliability issues associated with that feature, suggesting some dissatisfaction in that area.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express high praise for the vehicle, highlighting its incredible condition and aesthetic appeal. @70_duster loves the barn doors, while @sicklesteel admires the vehicle's color, calling it a beauty. @96Cruiser describes the truck as gorgeous, appreciating features like the chicken lights, and @ArtistFox notes how well the truck has been taken care of, indicating it appears to be a 'baby' of someone cherished. @VantageAuto (The Seller) shares that the Yukon is powered by an impressive 8.1-liter V8 engine, boasting its ability to haul heavy loads with ease and suggesting the vehicle has been well maintained with documentation seldom seen in similar listings.
Neutral: Some comments seek clarification and additional information concerning the vehicle's condition. @LECain inquires about potential engine oil or power steering leaks and specifically asks if the radiator has been replaced, acknowledging the age of the vehicle. @VantageAuto (The Seller) responds carefully, noting the vehicle is a 2001 model and stating he did not notice any issues while emphasizing the Yukon's reliability and overall driving performance. Additionally, @BenPrickett and @Rusty_Bumpa discuss technical aspects of past models, particularly relating to the quadrasteer feature and its availability in later years.
Negative: While the overall sentiment towards the vehicle is largely positive, there are minor concerns regarding age-related issues. @LECain specifically asks about leaks, hinting at common concerns for vehicles of that vintage and prompting a cautious response from @VantageAuto (The Seller). Although the seller provided reassurance about the vehicle's running condition, there remains a sense of hesitation due to the potential for age-related wear, demonstrating that some buyers may still have lingering doubts about such classic models.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @hamonosho (The Seller) articulately describes their enthusiasm for the V10 Touareg TDI, noting its unique characteristics and mechanical reliability after extensive work, including turbo and emissions upgrades. They highlight the beauty of the vehicle in blue silver, which is rare in motor vehicle history, and express satisfaction with the vehicle's performance following service interventions. @packardv8 echoes these sentiments, describing the V10 TDI as exceptional and a vehicle no one else can match, although they mention that it might not fit all needs.
Neutral: @hamonosho (The Seller) provides detailed information about the work done on the vehicle, including the replacement of turbos, batteries, and various mechanical systems. They also mention known quirks such as warning lights and a torn ball joint boot but maintain that the car runs well overall. @chromantix inquiries about the effects of emissions modifications on performance and fuel efficiency, to which the seller responds with insights on fuel economy improvements while stating that power levels remain consistent with factory tuning.
Negative: There are concerns raised about potential reliability issues, such as the headlight leveling system malfunctioning despite repairs, indicating deeper electrical issues might be needed. @hamonosho (The Seller) mentions sporadic warning lights at startup and occasional mechanical issues typical for a 20-year-old vehicle, alongside the necessity of addressing a few lingering quirks. This suggests that the Touareg, while improved, may still require attention to maintain its functionality and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed enthusiasm about the rare 2007 Audi Q7 4.2L Premium, highlighting the vehicle's low mileage of just 23,600 and its powerful 350 HP from the V8 engine paired with Audi's Quattro AWD system. @SuperCarsLLC, the seller, describes the car as a 'unicorn for enthusiasts' and emphasizes its premium features such as heated leather seats, four-zone climate control, and a Bose sound system. Additionally, @Lesr3204 shares a personal connection to the vehicle, expressing interest in replacing their current daily driver with this stylish and unique SUV, particularly appreciating its striking Cobalt Blue color.
Neutral: @bozman raises questions about the Audi's title status and history, expressing familiarity with the local area where the vehicle was previously inspected. The seller, @SuperCarsLLC, responds to these inquiries, clarifying that the vehicle has a CLEAN TITLE and ensuring that they only handle clean title vehicles without any salvage or rebuilt histories. The seller's transparency regarding the vehicle's past ownership and current condition appears to reassure potential buyers looking for reliability with no lingering issues.
Negative: Despite the positive features, some concerns have been noted. @bozman queries about the car's history, indicating that it has bounced around auctions, suggesting potential red flags over its past. Although @SuperCarsLLC affirms that the vehicle has no known issues currently, the mention of the car's auction history raises questions about its reliability and value proposition in the long term. Additionally, there are minor cosmetic defects reported, including curb rash and scratches, which may detract from its overall appeal for some buyers.
![]() |
38k-Mile Carmona Red Metallic 2007 Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe 6-Speed
WP0AD29987S786814
Lot 238853
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: Comments praise the stunning Carmona Red exterior color, with @chrischavarro noting it as "insane" and @billyblyth calling it "handsome." Many users, including @MotorsCarsOfTheMainLine (The Seller), highlight the exceptional features and specifications, such as the desirable manual transmission and the Mezger engine, characterizing it as a "fantastic" and rare vehicle. Enthusiasts like @KevinH and @newcastlemyst appreciate the high-quality modifications and the performance enhancements, suggesting that despite some subjective opinions on the interior, the car has great potential and unique appeal to the right buyer.
Neutral: Several commenters express neutrality regarding the vehicle's modifications, aiming for a balanced view. @LaserGuru1948 points out that the heavy modifications will attract specific buyers, while @MotorcarsOfTheMainLine (The Seller) acknowledges that it would be easy to revert to a more stock look. The comments also discuss the performance aspects of the car, with @NWian appreciating the locking rear differential and the clean undercarriage, indicating a well-maintained vehicle overall.
Negative: On the other hand, some users are critical of the interior modifications. @Beneno1 voices concern over the "poor interior" and @JoshC710 expresses sadness over the departure from his preferred interior styling, labeling it as a missing opportunity due to personal taste. Questions arise from commenters like @Hazmat06 and @Justification, asking whether the rear seat modifications are reversible and suggesting the need for a full restoration to the original interior. Additionally, @newcastlemyst critiques the modifications as polarizing, reflecting a division in opinion among prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the overall appeal of the vehicle, describing it as "a beautiful V wagon" (@AZSkye) and "very nice" (@nick778). The current mileage of 96K is mentioned positively by @mcbulb, who points out that it translates to only 8K miles per year, which is relatively low for a Texas car that can be driven year-round. Additionally, the seller (@rthompson6805) shares that the vehicle has never been raced or tracked, emphasizing its history as a daily driver and its maintained condition as a garage queen for the last couple of years.
Neutral: The seller addresses inquiries about the vehicle's condition and service history. When asked by @cmaddox about the major components, the seller confirms that no work has been performed on the items listed. They also clarify that the paint is fully original and that there has been no bodywork since ownership. Further, @Msoden82 inquires about the "actual mileage notation" on the title, to which the seller explains the Texas title annotation requirements regarding mileage accuracy.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance and potential issues associated with its age and mileage. @nexusautobrokers expresses a desire to convert the vehicle to a manual transmission, hinting at dissatisfaction with the automatic feature. @nick778 comments suggest that an inspection report from a local Cadillac dealership would be beneficial for prospective buyers, highlighting the importance of assessing the condition of critical components as the vehicle ages. Additionally, @VVagon raises a point about warranty coverage related to the vehicle's blower, showing some apprehension about its maintenance background.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Signsbyjc (The Seller) offers helpful guidance for potential buyers by encouraging them to use the contact seller button for shipping estimates, indicating a willingness to assist and support inquiries. This proactive communication creates a welcoming atmosphere for any prospective customers, showing that the seller is engaged and responsive.
Neutral: Some comments provide general inquiries about the vehicle's specifications and availability, reflecting a typical buyer's curiosity. There are also logistical questions about shipping and payment options, which are common considerations for any potential transaction, suggesting that the vehicle is being evaluated methodically by interested buyers.
Negative: There are concerns raised by some potential buyers regarding the price point of the vehicle, with some feeling it may be too high compared to similar models on the market. Additionally, a few comments express skepticism about the vehicle's condition based on limited information available in the listing, which could deter prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle in question, a 1965 Superformance Cobra, has received numerous accolades for its impeccable build and performance. @lloyddon1, the seller, highlighted that the car is not just an average Cobra but a showpiece with meticulous details, featuring a powerful Ford Godzilla 7.3L engine capable of over 600 horsepower. Commenters like @Rpl1 and @Lanz1 praised the quality and stunning aesthetics, stating that it represents the best of what they have ever seen on Bring a Trailer. Additionally, many users expressed excitement and confidence in the auction process, with past experiences from the seller influencing their positive outlook. Commenters noted the competitive pricing relative to the substantial build costs, enhancing the appeal of this unique vehicle.
Neutral: Commenters had various inquiries that show interest in the vehicle's specific features, maintenance needs, and registration in certain states. @Hdsporty1988 and @mjrauma asked about the vehicle's differential and top options, while @crvp raised a concern regarding registration in California, leading to an informative response from @lloyddon1. Some users like @The_Enthusiast sought clarification on the custom details and interior materials, showcasing an eagerness to learn more about the Cobra's specifications. Overall, the discussion was filled with analytical commentary on the build's components, emphasizing a desire for clarity among potential bidders without overtly negative sentiments.
Negative: While the overwhelming response to the Cobra has been positive, a few commenters presented skepticism or voiced concerns. @BESCFAN questioned the practicality of including a stereo system in such a loud performance vehicle, while @OldVelasco pondered the need for earplugs, hinting at potential drawbacks in terms of noise. Additionally, @Bigvinny humorously suggested that listening to the engine would come at a price, suggesting some concerns over the practicality of owning such a high-performance car. However, these comments did not detract significantly from the vehicle's overall reputation, as most feedback remained enthusiastic and complimentary.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PhillyTom provides an honest description of the car, noting that it's a fun vehicle to drive despite some minor scratches. He emphasizes that it might not win 'best in show' but is likely to win 'most fun to drive' on a pleasant day. Several commenters, like @jimreillyjmr and @zoltan, express positive sentiments about the car's value as a reliable driver given its condition and age, praising the seller for being upfront and transparent about any issues.
Neutral: @alexgcran inquires about the tire condition and brake servicing, highlighting that the rear brakes were serviced recently. @Joe_in_NH shares useful advice regarding potential parts that may need replacement based on past experience, specifically the thermostat and radiator. @PhillyTom informs interested parties that the car passed inspection with the airbag light on and mentions other minor concerns raised by potential buyers, indicating that he has checked and confirmed no major issues are present.
Negative: Concerns are raised regarding the airbag light indicated in the vehicle, with @mikeor questioning how the car passed inspection with it illuminated. @JDLWellderly points out potential leakage under the hood, prompting further inquiries about possible fixes with @PhillyTom stating he has not observed any major oil leaks. Commenters express concerns about the state of the headlight lenses, noting their UV damage and questioning the visibility at night.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @parmstrong611_WFNC (The Seller) expresses a strong affinity for the DB9, describing it as a great car that he has thoroughly enjoyed. He hopes the next owner will find it as enjoyable as he did, highlighting his personal connection to the vehicle. In his comments, he mentions maintaining it well since purchase and shows pride in having brought the car up to standard with the help of an Aston Martin dealership. He notes the vehicle's enjoyable driving experience, especially with the powerful 12-cylinder engine, reflecting his positive experience with the car.
Neutral: @parmstrong611_WFNC (The Seller) addresses several inquiries about the car's history and condition, particularly regarding the potential odometer rollback and some display issues. He tries to clarify the situation by explaining the title history and mileage discrepancies, attributing them to clerical errors rather than malicious intent. He also responds to comments about specific wear and tear, providing transparency about the driver's seat and its condition, reassuring potential buyers about the functionality of the gauges and radio despite the display damage.
Negative: Commenters like @msheldonsb raise concerns about the vehicle's odometer history and possible rollback, which could imply trust issues for potential buyers. @madal11 also points out seemingly unusual locations for display damage, questioning the reliability of the vehicle's internal systems. Moreover, @mjtjr82 highlights the noticeable difference in leather quality between the driver and passenger seats, suggesting possible repair issues that could affect buyer interest.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enjoyment and nostalgia about the vehicle, particularly @RBailey57 who reminisced about their own experience with a similar model from the 1980s, highlighting the bliss of driving with the top down on warm nights. @NineLivesRacing (The Seller) shared additional information about the car's features, indicating past care with a gas vapor recovery system and a catalytic converter that is still in place. Furthermore, the seller was receptive to inquiries about the vehicle, showing a willingness to share details and facilitate viewings, as seen in their responses to interested parties like @SlideRuleOne.
Neutral: There were technical discussions regarding the vehicle's requirements and maintenance that provided a balanced view. @dands inquired about smog regulations in California, leading @freakinutz to clarify that the car, being from 1979, would need to pass smog tests unless in specific exempt counties. @NineLivesRacing (The Seller) mentioned that the car contains a catalytic converter and had recently dealt with minor leaks, which was relevant information for potential buyers. The seller also addressed queries about repairs made to the car, including providing pre-repair and post-repair pictures of the floor pans when asked by @Airworm.
Negative: Despite the positive anecdotes, some negative reflections surfaced regarding potential reliability issues. @RBailey57 noted that their own experience with a similar Midget had reliability concerns, particularly due to its Lucas electric systems. Additionally, @Airworm raised concerns about the possibility of fluid leaks due to age, and @NineLivesRacing (The Seller) confirmed a slight dripping from the oil pan gasket, showing the vehicle may have ongoing maintenance needs. Overall, these comments indicate that while there is affection for the vehicle, there are important considerations regarding its reliability and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Numerous comments praise the vehicle, particularly its meticulous restoration and attention to detail. @boaboyoz describes it as a "delight," complimenting its brown and white color scheme and overall build quality. @Scott68GTO acknowledges the truck's beauty, while @svatem echoes this sentiment and adds that the bumper looks fantastic, affirming the rugged quality of the components. Many users express admiration for the seller's dedication to the restoration, indicating it is a "labor of love."
Neutral: The seller @Onlythetruthsorry1223 provides detailed specifications about the vehicle, including its features like the factory numbers matching 350 engine and the extensive restoration work done on it. The seller addresses inquiries regarding the winch and bumper, clarifying the products used and their significance. Commenters also discuss the California smog regulations applicable to the vehicle, reflecting an understanding of the legalities involved with older cars in certain states. Overall, the comments contain informative exchanges about various features of the truck that interest enthusiasts.
Negative: Some users make critical remarks, such as @Stubbs355 questioning the labeling of the winch on the bumper, suggesting that it could be misleading. Though the seller addresses this point clarifying the distinction between the bumper and winch brands, this feedback highlights a concern over potential misrepresentation. Furthermore, there is underlying negativity concerning California's stringent smog requirements, as mentioned by @svatem, which makes the vehicle less appealing to state buyers who may have to navigate these regulations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the 2004 Lincoln Navigator as a luxurious and underrated SUV, praised for its combination of style, comfort, and functionality. Commentors like @Ramenator and @Longmire45 enthusiastically express their admiration for the vehicle's appearance and capabilities, with @Ramenator calling it the most underrated luxury SUV of all time. Users like @Undertaker69 also reminisce about the vehicle's features, noting its futuristic elements such as power running boards, which were considered innovative at the time.
Neutral: Several inquiries regarding specific functional aspects of the vehicle were made by potential buyers. Commentors like @PanJaguar and @Jimbob123 posed detailed questions about key features such as the towing capabilities, air suspension, and service history. The seller, @genevamotorcars, promptly responded to many of these questions, confirming details like the presence of a towing pack and the condition of the vehicle's components, while also agreeing to provide requested videos of various functions and features.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's overall condition. @Jimbob123 pointed out signs of possible rust and deterioration, asking for further underbody pictures to assess the vehicle's integrity. @PanJaguar expressed frustration with the seller's communication about unanswered questions, stressing the importance of transparency regarding the vehicle's condition and seeking reassurance about past issues like seat comfort and potential re-painting. Overall, while many comments showcased enthusiasm for the model, there remains a cautious undertone surrounding the vehicle's maintenance and the seller's responsiveness.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @thewrx expressed admiration for the vehicle, describing it as a "sweet truck" and highlighting its clean condition, noting that it would be ideal for an EJ engine swap. @carsfromafar (The Seller) emphasized the truck's reliability, stating that it starts, idles, and drives smoothly without any mechanical issues. Additionally, @carsfromafar mentioned recent maintenance updates, such as new wiper blades and positive feedback received during a recent outing, indicating that it draws attention from bystanders.
Neutral: @Goriilla inquired about the vehicle's mechanical performance, showing a constructive interest in understanding its running condition. @drdodds asked specifically about the ignition type, while @steveiguess sought clarification about the air conditioning system. @carsfromafar (The Seller) provided clear and informative responses to these questions, describing the Sambar's ignition system and confirming the absence of air conditioning, which aligns with other vehicles in its class.
Negative: @neilpierson25 made a comment regarding the truck's camouflage, suggesting it would only be effective in certain environments like Norway, which could imply a degree of sarcasm or dissatisfaction with the design. However, no serious complaints or criticisms about the vehicle's condition or function were noted in the comments.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mef0629 praised the vehicle as having a fantastic background story and being well documented, suggesting it would perform very well in competitions. @curated (The Seller) shared that this is a one-owner California car in great condition, having undergone thorough checks and repairs. Users like @Leif_in_Calif expressed fond memories of the 912, highlighting its reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, while @LouFifer noted the car's excellent provenance and the joy it brings to vintage car enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments from @Jim_Liberty and others noted the car's appearance, with @Casman emphasizing needed adjustments and @milage appreciating that it maintained the correct ride height. @Spyder906 raised questions about rust, asking if certain patches had been repaired, and @andyandotis inquired about the possibility of viewing the car. @curated (The Seller) and others provided insights into the vehicle's status while promoting community conversations around its history and maintenance.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the car, with @Frank_Barrett mentioning a patch below the driver's seat that could indicate underlying issues. @LouFifer highlighted concerns about rust and potential problems with the engine compartment, while @Alfetta70s questioned why the seller had put limited mileage on the vehicle recently. Additionally, @2wheeladvr pointed out areas in the engine bay that looked compromised, fueling skepticism around the vehicle's maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CobraVic11 expresses love for the car, indicating strong affection for it. @carfan1978 wishes well for the seller, encouraging others to participate in the auction actively. @Entusiast praises the vehicle, highlighting it as a rare, gorgeous example of a popular model and believes its value will increase in the collector market. @borninthe60s admires the Lincoln's striking midnight blue paint, and @Middler89 echoes this sentiment, calling it 'a beauty.'
Neutral: @Pirate60 (The Seller) explains the reason for selling the car, which is to make space for a recently restored Mustang. @Dland1968 raises practical questions regarding the car's air conditioning and original parts, while also seeking additional photos of the vehicle's undercarriage. @CFD shares a similar sentiment about storage issues and notes the enjoyment of owning such a classic, reflective of shared experiences among collectors.
Negative: There are no overtly negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided comments, indicating positive engagement with the sale and admiration for the car.
![]() |
7k-Mile 2019 Volkswagen Beetle Convertible 2.0T Final Edition SEL
3VW5DAATXKM508949
Lot 238874
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @jmc2005 (The Seller) expresses profound pride in presenting the convertible to potential buyers, emphasizing its rarity, especially given the low mileage. They share their emotional attachment to the car, stating that it was owned by their daughter who is now studying abroad, making it necessary to sell. @1xpjdd admires the car's beauty and seeks clarification about its model designation, indicating a deep interest in the vehicle's specifics, which reflects positively on its desirability.
Neutral: @1xpjdd points out a possible discrepancy in the vehicle's model designation and inquires about a window sticker to confirm details. This comment suggests that there may be some confusion regarding the car's classification, but it is asked in a constructive manner. @Frankieballs comments on the likelihood that the car may be preserved as a collectible rather than driven frequently, showing an understanding of its potential investment value.
Negative: @Frankieballs airs a slight concern regarding the car's future, pondering whether it will be passed around merely as a collector's item and not driven to enjoy its features fully. While this isn't outright negative, it implies a potential downside in the perception of the vehicle's intended use, which could diminish its value as a daily driver experience. Additionally, the request for a Carfax by @1xpjdd could indicate a level of skepticism about the vehicle's history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the Jeepster Commando for its excellent restoration and overall quality. @rustyray called it a 'beaut', while @Carpatrick described it as 'one of the finest if not the finest Jeepster.' @Trust-in-the-Machine highlighted its perfect presentation and unique features, commending the seller for choosing to retain some unrestored parts. Others like @JohnF1966 and @sbdubya noted the soundness of the restoration and the good choice of maintaining the original V6 engine, emphasizing its appeal to classic vehicle enthusiasts. Overall, the restoration has garnered admiration, showcasing the vehicle as a standout in the classic car community.
Neutral: The seller, @Obe68, provided detailed specifications and additional information in response to inquiries. @RoaminGladiator asked for the dimensions of the Jeepster, and @kmole raised questions about engine modifications and the reserve price. The seller clarified that the dimensions are 67 inches in height, 58 inches in width, and 166 inches in length, and confirmed the vehicle is operational with a new steering box. There was also mention of a previous EFI upgrade that was reverted to a carburetor due to performance issues. @federalist verified the approximate costs put into the jeep, reflecting on the investment required for such restorations.
Negative: Some comments pointed out areas of concern or suggestions about the Jeepster. @kmole expressed skepticism about the vehicle's reserve price given the substantial investment in the restoration, suggesting it might not sell unless the reserve was lower. There were also mentions of personal preferences, as @kmole noted that many buyers might prefer an automatic transmission for ease of use. While @bjd918 requested more information regarding possible leaks and the status of the engine, the seller confidently replied that there are no noticeable issues. Overall, while the vehicle received much admiration, there were underlying concerns about marketability and potential modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Dollycat3 enthusiastically described the Thunderbird as a "stupendous, gorgeous, triple black, original California black plate Thunderbird," eliciting approval from other commenters like @hoppy18 and @tjclassic. The seller, @Countrygents, reinforced this by sharing his decades of experience in car collecting and emphasized how the car looks and drives like new, highlighting its excellent condition, from the interior chrome to the smooth and silent driving experience. Aside from the cosmetic details, he mentioned that he replaced various parts to ensure the Thunderbird runs perfectly, and he welcomed inquiries regarding the car, showcasing his openness and reliability as a seller.
Neutral: Commenters like @gocorcoran and @cruzahome raised queries about the vehicle's odometer reading and wear on the driver's seat, pondering whether the mileage was indeed original while suggesting that the seat's wear might stem from age rather than heavy use. @Countrygents responded to these points with detailed explanations about the car's features, including the exhaust system's options and the overall performance of the vehicle. He also mentioned the documented paintwork, including details about a single door that had paintwork, keeping communication transparent and informative for potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were expressed about the car's condition, particularly regarding the driver's seat wear, with @cruzahome questioning if there might be a discrepancy in the mileage due to the apparent aging. @neilpierson25 suggested that the wear could be foam degradation instead of usage, hinting at a potential issue. Additionally, there was curiosity surrounding the car's original paint and modifications, prompting some skepticism about the overall authenticity of the vehicle. Despite these concerns, the seller maintained confidence in the car's quality and its untouched charm.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the nostalgia and fond memories associated with the Renault R5, with several former owners reminiscing about their own experiences with the vehicle. @Olivier145 recalls the Renault's reputation for turbocharging and its status in motorsports, while @HeavyTank77 appreciates the unique red corduroy interior, equating it to vintage charm. @Bowenbuilt praises the meticulous care taken by the current owner, emphasizing that this vehicle is a worthwhile addition to any collection. Others like @tfr1 and @snafuracer share experiences that depict the R5 Turbo as a fun, nimble 'pocket rocket', showcasing its engaging driving experience and retro appeal, indicating an overall positive sentiment towards the car from fans and collectors alike.
Neutral: Commenters express a mix of curiosity and interest in the vehicle's details. @WoldRacing (The Seller) provides clarifications regarding the car's title status and the procedures surrounding titles for imported vehicles, stating that there is no lien on the car. @Keezo74 raises questions about the legality of registering the vehicle in California, indicating interest from potential buyers outside the local market. There are also inquiries into specific features of the car, such as the condition of the headliner and any rust concerns, suggesting an engaged but cautious approach among potential buyers and fans.
Negative: Some comments convey concerns or criticisms regarding specific aspects of the car's design or condition. @SlowNRusty's joking remark about the number of bolts to secure the brake rotor versus the wheels points to a perceived oddity in the vehicle's engineering. @longlivekel's query about possible rust holes in the suspension carriers indicates a more critical view of the car’s condition. Moreover, while many appreciate the nostalgia, there is an underlying acknowledgment of the maintenance challenges that accompany owning such vintage vehicles, suggesting that while the memories are cherished, the practicalities of ownership may raise concerns.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters are highly impressed with the vehicle, praising its stunning build and modifications. @Murphyscu thinks it has a "very nice build," while @Robert_Alder calls it "beautiful" and "stunning." @decadance-music congratulates the seller on the wonderful restoration work. Many comments highlight specific aspects of the build, like @PoweredbyFord's observation of the front bumper delete looking great and giving it an Italian vintage vibe, which was echoed by @vintage_volvo's comment comparing it to a Ferrari. The attention to detail and quality of the restoration are emphasized, with @Volvoleks expressing appreciation for the seller's communication and approach to the project as rock solid.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific features, like the functionality of windshield wipers as noted by @Harley123 and @Volvoelske, who believes they might not be necessary in Arizona but could be desired elsewhere. Discussion about the vehicle's modifications related to aesthetics and performance was also prevalent, with @thaisch asking if the overdrive dash light works and @kautzman20 appreciating the subtle mods while being a purist. Furthermore, @Moots (the seller) addresses these inquiries, confirming that the windshield wiper motor works and providing details about the engine's modifications and new wiring harnesses.
Negative: A few comments present concerns or constructive criticism, highlighting potential drawbacks of the modifications. @charlie55 describes the vehicle as a "poor man's Ferrari" and suggests it needs a front bumper for better aesthetics and functionality. @JWHBOOMER expresses mixed feelings about the front bumper delete while others like @Erv52 express a wish for the original bumper or a modified version to be present. Additionally, @Buster020065 mentions a cold start issue, raising concerns regarding engine performance, while @wadds71 identifies minor misalignments in trim that could be tweaked. Overall, there is a mix of appreciation for the modifications and cautious advice regarding certain features.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Fzff expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle, particularly how they would love it in yellow to match their dream of reliving an entourage fantasy. @jsully14 shares nostalgia about owning a similar Hummer H3, emphasizing their fondness for the car and wishing luck to the seller. @boaboyoz also conveys positivity by referring to the H3 as a 'righteous red' and wishing luck to the auction.
Neutral: @Detroitrealist raises a valid question regarding the availability of parts and service options for GM dealers for this vehicle, indicating a general awareness of the practicality of owning an older model Hummer. @FayeJoe1977 contributes to this perspective by noting their own experience with a 2007 model, suggesting that while service is straightforward, certain parts are becoming less accessible and more costly.
Negative: The inherent challenges of maintaining an older Hummer are highlighted in @FayeJoe1977's comment regarding the scarcity and expense of parts. The conversation implies potential concerns about the longevity and maintenance of these vehicles as they age, affecting buyers' confidence. Additionally, @Detroitrealist's inquiry about dealership service hints at apprehension about ongoing support and service for a vehicle that may not be as widely supported by manufacturers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @NVGT350 praises the vehicle as a great cruiser, expressing admiration for it being a fun car, while @nexusautobrokers echoes similar sentiments about the enjoyment of driving this model. @WesParker, the seller, confirms that the car is indeed fun and receives compliments from onlookers almost every time he drives it. Additionally, @laffs appreciates the vehicle's aesthetics, highlighting its clean appearance and the iconic sound produced by the Flowmaster exhaust combined with the V8 engine.
Neutral: @psf1962 provides an inquiry regarding the vehicle's styling bar, noting its potential benefits in reducing wind turbulence when the top is down, and appreciates the car's look. @WesParker responds with confirmation that the styling bar does help with turbulence and offers extra support for the roof when it is up, indicating that it was installed by a reputable local shop. @Siowner2 comments on the collectibility of the GT convertible, particularly in excellent condition, which aligns with the condition of this car.
Negative: While the comments are predominantly positive, @mustangcurse expresses a desire for additional content, specifically a cold start and driving video, suggesting he wants to see more proof of the vehicle's performance. @WesParker acknowledges this request and commits to producing the content, but the need for more videos could imply that some buyers might require additional reassurance before proceeding.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Garygalaxy expressed enthusiasm for the Prowler, stating that anyone who drives one will be amazed at its quality, calling it a great car that is totally underrated. Additionally, @NomoreShillbids complimented the Foose wheels, noting that they are a classy tribute to the designer who inspired the Prowler's overall look.
Neutral: @69Daytona inquired about the original parts accompanying the car, such as wheels and bumpers. In response, @rixbat (The Seller) confirmed that the original wheels and bumpers are not available with the vehicle. @rixbat also shared useful resources, including links to videos featuring industry experts discussing the Prowler and a site for Prowler parts and accessories, indicating support for enthusiasts.
Negative: There were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle, as the majority of the feedback was either inquiries for additional information or positive remarks about the car's design and quality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @JAY-Z highlights that FLHXs have been Harley Davidson's best selling bike for a long time and describes this particular model as a great example, indicating its quality and desirability. @dklanecky1 also offers a positive note, expressing that the ride is very nice and wishing good luck with the auction, further endorsing the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @Rakk24 (The Seller) acknowledges @JAY-Z's comment regarding the saddlebag hardware and clarifies that the current hardware is not OEM. The seller provides useful information about the saddlebag recall, remarking on the ease of fixing it and recommending the replacement of hardware if planning for long trips. Additionally, @Rakk24 responds to @svee by supplying the tire date codes for transparency, but does not delve into detail about this aspect.
Negative: There are no significantly negative comments included, but @Rakk24 (The Seller) does mention that the saddlebag hardware is not the original equipment manufacturer (OEM), which might raise concerns for potential buyers about the bike's authenticity or reliability. There is a reminder regarding the recall, which might imply that some buyers could view this as a red flag, suggesting there may be underlying issues with the vehicle's design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its historical significance and unique design. @Frankieballs refers to it as a "beautiful sight" and anticipates a new owner will enjoy it. @Dollycat3 appreciates the vintage aesthetic and warm '70s vibe. Commenters like @Highcountry303 and @WilderDriven find the vehicle very appealing and even express a desire to purchase it, noting its cool factor and potential for modern upgrades. The overall sentiment from those praising the vehicle is that it has been well preserved and holds sentimental value for many.
Neutral: Several comments focus on promoting inquiry about the specifics of the vehicle's features and conditions. For instance, @Craterguard asks for detailed breakdowns of the working conditions of the vehicle’s equipment, while @Impala1996 inquires about towing capacity and wheel specifications. This area of discussion highlights a practical interest in understanding the vehicle's function and what it can offer to potential buyers, reflecting a more informational tone rather than purely emotional.
Negative: Some comments suggest a cautious view regarding the vehicle's limitations and condition. For example, @Highcountry303 notes a potential issue with rust on the front a-frames, hinting at concerns about its structural integrity. Additionally, @GXguy470 comments on confusion regarding the horsepower ratings, indicating that discrepancies in information may exist. Overall, while the initial reactions are largely positive, there are notable mentions of practicality and concerns for potential buyers to consider.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters express appreciation for the 1991 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 Targa, highlighting its unique combination of features like the Porsche Sport Seats, classic radio, and performance enhancements such as lightweight flywheel and RS sway bars. @CartBeforeHorse_BAT notes that the car is well presented, while @Profcarnut admires the model, suggesting that owning a 964 Targa is a great opportunity regardless of color preference. @Stunt_Road (The Seller) proudly details the car's specs and features, emphasizing the air conditioning's functionality and the inclusion of the original steering wheel, which adds to the car's overall value.
Neutral: There is a mix of opinions regarding the car's aesthetic, particularly its color and wheels. @VintageExcellence humorously mentions that the wheels may be a reason for the seller's quick turnover, while @Caymanorcarrera points out the retro wheels might not appeal to everyone. @Armin64 questions the condition of the leather seats and whether the AC functions well; he seems curious but also somewhat critical of the car's customization.
Negative: Some comments express dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the vehicle, particularly its cosmetic features. @Frankieballs suggests that the color could be improved, implying that anything but the 'GR' color would be better, while @Armin64 harshly criticizes the wheels and added logos that detract from the car's beauty. Additionally, @joubsta raises concerns about the car's history, specifically past repairs, asking for clarification on minor damage from 2017, indicating a potential worry about its overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @austin_alfa expresses admiration for the vehicle's design, noting its shapely and stylish appearance from every angle. They appreciate the hardtop's pillarless look, although they acknowledge that it comes with some cowl shake compared to the two-door version. Overall, they feel that the car is suitable for special outings and that its styling remains relevant today, alongside its reliable drivetrain. Other commentators like @Bug36T57 highlight the design feature of the Starliner lacking a B Pillar, which they feel adds to its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking clarification on aspects of the vehicle. @bubba1934 questions what is meant by 'stretched rear fenders', and @DrRocknZ.Babe provides corrections regarding the model's classification, emphasizing that it is a hardtop, not a coupe. @jcole asks for the listing to be corrected to reflect the vehicle's true designation, and both @ettev15z and @RedRacer10 inquire about the drivetrain components and specifications, such as the year of the Power Glide and engine type.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @tjkdk points out what appears to be large amounts of bondo in a specific picture, questioning whether it was previously dented or rusted. In response, @govnoglava (The Seller) acknowledges that at over 70 years old, the car likely has some bondo, but reassures that the original floors are solid. Additionally, @ettev15z remarks on the potential rust issues in the rear fender area, highlighting the vehicle's propensity to collect debris there. Overall, there seems to be skepticism regarding the vehicle's restoration quality and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bull-Taco appreciates the vehicle's 70's old school stance, highlighting the nostalgia associated with its design. @DCHoliday (The Seller) shares that since acquiring the car, several improvements have been made, including the addition of power steering which enhances driving enjoyment. @Quadrifoglio sees "lots to work with here", suggesting the car's potential for customization and upgrades.
Neutral: @Mlawdawg and @andyh127 both inquire about the vehicle's history at auction and the current suspension setup. @DCHoliday (The Seller) clarifies that the car ran through Mecum but did not sell due to a reserve miscommunication, assuring that the vehicle itself isn't problematic. Additionally, adjustments can be made to the car's stance according to the tastes of the next owner, and @DCHoliday (The Seller) offers to provide further details or documentation as needed.
Negative: @REE2 criticizes the stance of the vehicle, stating it looks 'all kind of wrong' and suggests it’s an easy fix while @andyh127 echoes this sentiment about the backend looking "super-floaty" with an overarched wheel design. @Dualcamvtec points out concerns over panel gaps in the vehicle’s construction, questioning if these issues have been addressed. @GrigioF430 raises technical questions about tire size and fitment, indicating that the vehicle's current setup might not align with optimum performance or aesthetics.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its uniqueness and collectibility. @bmotorenwerke points out that it is a fun and rare model, noting that only 415 were imported to the United States. @Jlocks2 shares their happy experience with the car, mentioning that it’s an excellent choice and a lot of fun to drive. @Spoolenturbo recalls fond memories of their own GP and encourages others to own one, praising its distinctiveness compared to similar models like the R32.
Neutral: There are inquiries about specific issues related to the vehicle, including the air conditioning effectiveness and the condition of the headliner. @Wimbledon asks about the air conditioning, while @MrHogan addresses concerns about sagging in the headliner. @Mikalmick (The Seller) responds to these questions directly, confirming that the air conditioning system has been recently recharged and is functioning well. Additionally, the seller provides context about the headliner sag, which is a common issue with these vehicles.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns regarding certain aspects of the car, such as the low-speed fan issue noted by @Gearheadaddy and the absence of fog lights mentioned by @NativeEastTexan. @ModMINI acknowledges the low-speed fan's annoyance but reassures that it's not dangerous. Furthermore, there are discussions about potential water leaks and rust, with @Spoolenturbo bringing up personal experiences that align with common problems in these models. @ewh49 queries about headliner repair, indicating that maintenance may be required for specific components.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Swingandamiss notes that this 1984 Z28 5-speed is likely the lowest mile car of its kind ever offered for auction, boasting only 4411 miles and being described as 'literally in the wrapper new.' Commenters like @topduarte express their admiration for the vehicle's condition, highlighting its showroom quality and noting how it represents a nostalgic time machine for those who once owned similar models. Furthermore, @TheCritic praises the car for its rarity and excellent preservation, suggesting that it might set a new record for auction sales due to its exceptional paperwork and provenance.
Neutral: While many comments focus on the vehicle's pristine condition, there are inquiries regarding specific features. For instance, @joeybsyc questions the originality of the car's seats, noting the unusual vinyl and cloth combo he has not seen before. Additionally, @951ltwt seeks confirmation on the car's rear end specifications, indicating an interest in its mechanical features. @nwtrekkr raises concerns about the vehicle's temperature gauge, prompting @Swingandamiss to clarify the situation regarding the gauges and their readings during testing.
Negative: Some comments reflect skepticism, as @68PONCHO inquires about the vehicle's past ownership and the reasons for its extremely low mileage, implying potential red flags regarding its history. Similarly, @nwtrekkr's worry about a possible overheating issue indicates a negative perception of some details shared in the listing. Furthermore, @CarFanatic1 remarks about his missed opportunity due to personal preference for black cars, subtly expressing disappointment that the vehicle is not the desired color, while wishing others good luck with their bids.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Alfa Romeo Brera, highlighting its beautiful design and unique styling. @oferk65 noted its beauty and wished it were legal in the US, while @austin_alfa lamented the missed opportunities for American car enthusiasts to experience such designs. @mini33 compared it to an Italian Volkswagen Corrado, and @Alfista_Canadese shared their own love for the Brera, indicating it as a terrific car. Additionally, @Prostrho referred to it as a 'dream spec' vehicle, acknowledging the common paint issues but still appreciating its beauty and handling.
Neutral: Several comments focused on the practicality and ownership experiences of the car. @ParabolicaMotors, the seller, provided detailed insights into their ownership journey, citing their long wait to acquire the car and their satisfaction in driving it. The seller also addressed questions about the car's service history, paint imperfections, and engine details while answering inquiries from potential buyers. @jww1952 asked for additional information about service history and spare tires, showing a genuine interest in understanding the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns about issues related to the car's legality and maintenance challenges in the US. @sade shared apprehension about never being able to drive the car on US streets, while @CarCrazy24 echoed a desire for better service options. Paint issues were also highlighted by several users, with @motohealer mentioning clear coat problems that are common among Breras, and @thevintagecarguy jokingly suggesting that the seller should provide long-term storage to meet US import regulations. Additionally, @AndyN remarked on the use of a GM engine, perceiving it as inferior compared to the traditional Alfa engines, which stirred some debate among enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic and functional aspects. @ajhyman referred to it as a "Cool truck," reflecting a general admiration. @Smricha2 added a humorous remark about the truck being a conversation starter in their driveway, suggesting a positive view of its presence. @BenFWH001 (The Seller) provided clarifications about upgrades made to enhance the vehicle's power and reliability, indicating a commitment to quality and performance.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification and additional information about the vehicle. @TJVCar posed a question about the age and condition of both the engine and transmission, to which @BenFWH001 (The Seller) responded with precise details about the installation dates and mileage. @Mdsanders inquired about potential leaks, and @BenFWH001 (The Seller) explained the measures taken to address prior leaks and ensure the vehicle's integrity. Additionally, @2hecknback asked for more information regarding the rear access steps and air vent features, indicating a desire for functional details.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns that could be viewed negatively. @Mdsanders questioned the presence of leaks, which pointed to a potential issue in the vehicle's maintenance history. While @Baba27 asked if the vehicle is street legal, @BenFWH001 (The Seller) confirmed its legality in Wisconsin but acknowledged that there may be varying regulations in other states. Furthermore, @sln583 commented on previous modifications made to the vehicle, indicating some elements have been removed, which may raise concerns for potential buyers regarding its original capabilities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the 2012 Bentley Continental GTC as a stunning vehicle that embodies luxury and performance, with @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) emphasizing its excellent condition and functionality. The seller describes the car as both visually impressive and well-maintained, suggesting a perfect blend of design and craftsmanship. @Thistledew adds to this positivity by expressing curiosity about the appealing color combination of the car, suggesting it stands out among others.
Neutral: Comments also show a level of inquiry regarding specific details about the vehicle. @Mcdjohn requests information about the window sticker, build sheet, and tire dates, indicating that potential buyers are seeking transparency about the car's history and condition. @CharlotteWheels queries whether this is the same car previously auctioned at Mecum Glendale, hinting at the vehicle's background and possibly seeking to verify its auction history.
Negative: On the downside, there are hints of tension within the comment section, particularly surrounding @borneo's remarks, which were flagged as non-constructive by other users. @PCowell questions whether the car has undergone inspections, expressing concern about potential maintenance costs, which signals apprehension among potential buyers about the financial implications of ownership. Additionally, there are discussions about community dynamics, with @jusaur and @borneo addressing what they perceive as censorship, which may detract from a constructive dialogue.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BenQCarCare describes the vehicle as a must-under-appreciated modern car that is phenomenal to drive. @JAY-Z mentions that RS60s are flying under the radar and emphasizes that now is the time to buy, calling the car nice. @Saxofrass agrees, stating these cars offer a lot of enjoyment, and @Wob (The Seller) highlights the car's low miles and great model as impressive selling points, ready for spring and summer driving.
Neutral: @MoRhino expresses curiosity regarding the minor accident reported on the CARFAX, while @TT-V12-4-ME requests more photos of the vehicle's undercarriage due to concerns about potential damage. @patrickongena compliments the car and its presentation but asks for outdoor photos and a driving video, and @nowr2go requests detailed pictures of the convertible top to better understand the car's condition.
Negative: @RS60Spyder suggests that if the car had a manual transmission and no accident history, its value would be significantly higher. @blue44 admits feeling let down by the automatic transmission selector but appreciates the car's overall charm. @Wob (The Seller) addresses the comments, clarifying that the vehicle has minor damage rather than a minor accident, which some commenters misunderstood.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz described the 997 GT3 Cup as "wicked fast" and praised it as very cool. @skonker indicated that the car can perform impressively even with hours beyond the generally suggested rebuild number, asserting that they have managed long time ownership without issues on powerful models. Acknowledging the seller, @Wob promoted the car, noting it's one of the best driving experiences, particularly appreciating the upgraded 991 engine, which has proven to be more robust and capable with enhanced power bandwidth.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical specifics and service documentation. @uscarrera asked about the age of the fuel cell bladder and any crash history, while multiple users like @TJK06 and @Carreracup inquired about transmission and engine hours, echoing concerns regarding rebuild intervals for durability. @bg191 raised questions about inspection locations and @TBCars sought service and repair records, underlying that potential buyers are interested in thoroughly understanding the car's history before committing.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the overall costs associated with maintaining the vehicle. @Carreracup and @sbmaine provided estimates on service costs that were deemed high, with references to $1,000 an hour being unrealistic for most racers, echoing uncertainty in maintenance expenses. @kleinschuster questioned whether comprehensive documentation was available for the engine service, hinting at worries around transparency in the car's engineering history. Despite this, @skonker defended the reliability of well-managed Cup Cars, aiming to dispel some of the skepticism shared by other commenters.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the outstanding aesthetic appeal and performance of the 1991 Corvette Convertible, describing it as "stunning in person" and an "iconic American sports car at a very attainable price." @lloyddon1 emphasizes that it drives amazing and is a great car for various occasions, from casual drives to special date nights. The vehicle is presented as a well-maintained classic that is ready for immediate enjoyment after a fresh service. The seller boasts about having a stellar reputation with a significant number of successful transactions, which inspires confidence in potential bidders.
Neutral: Some commenters have raised questions concerning the vehicle's history, specifically referring to an incident reported on the Carfax that indicated moderate damage from an accident nearly 36 years ago. @rossocorsa328gts inquired about any visible evidence of repairs, leading @lloyddon1 to reassure that careful inspections show no apparent signs of past damage. Similarly, @dominic6673 sought clarification on whether the vehicle has a rebuilt title, to which the seller confirmed it does not and described the current condition as impeccable without signs of any prior repairs.
Negative: Concerns were expressed by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's past damage as listed on Carfax. @donniepmiller noted that despite the moderate damage, it could have been as minor as a bumper cover replacement, and emphasized that the car has many positive attributes. However, others still held apprehensions about the severity of the incident and its implications for the vehicle’s current title status. These worries suggest that while the seller maintains confidence in the car's condition, some bidders remain cautious due to its accident history.
![]() |
Supercharged 27k-mile 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 6-Speed
1G1YY32G415109050
Lot 238844
Dealer
![]() |
Positive: @Dsparks74 expressed a positive experience with the manual Supercharged C5 convertible, saying that buyers will enjoy a fantastic smooth ride and ample power while shifting through the gears. @agautosales (The Seller) agreed with @Dsparks74, noting that the supercharger transforms the driving experience, making it feel similar to their C6 Z06.
Neutral: @agautosales (The Seller) acknowledged @gethuge's request for a cold start video, promising to add it. Additionally, @RobertEHoffmanJr requested more information about the undercarriage and tire date codes. In response, @agautosales (The Seller) confirmed that all four tires are of the same brand and from 2023 and pledged to capture undercarriage photos over the weekend.
Negative: There were no negative comments or criticisms about the vehicle mentioned in the conversation.
![]() |


































































































































































