Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
Coyote-Powered 1967 Ford Mustang GT500CR 5-Speed by Classic Recreations
7F01T205832
Lot 239475
Dealer
 |
Positive: Many commenters praise the overall look and performance of the Coyote-Powered 1967 Ford Mustang GT500CR 5-Speed. @Dollycat3 expresses excitement about the car's color choices, while @johnnyb11 finds the driving video impressive, noting how effortless it looks. @Lancer13 and @gtautolounge (The Seller) are also commended for the quality of the driving videos, with @Lancer13 stating they set a standard for others. Other comments highlight admiration for the car's beautiful build and classic lines, even from those who typically might not favor the Eleanor style, such as @funkaholik, who appreciates how well this car maintains its classic aesthetics.
Neutral: A number of comments inquire about the car's specifications and the details behind its performance. @PhilO asks whether the vehicle has ever been dyno’d, seeking numbers on horsepower and torque, which @gtautolounge (The Seller) provides as the car making ~535hp. Additionally, @Stang500 wants to know about the car's recent maintenance and if there are any current issues, to which @gtautolounge (The Seller) responds confirming that all fluids are good and there are no known leaks or drivability issues.
Negative: Concerns about the car’s price and technical performance are voiced by several commenters. @BadAzp laments the $150k price tag, suggesting that is significantly high, with @gtautolounge (The Seller) anticipating it may go beyond that. @jake54914 points out a discrepancy concerning the horsepower figures, raising doubts whether an intake manifold swap could justify the power claims, implying a potential exaggeration. @WingedWheels cautions about driving techniques displayed in the video, indicating some risks taken during the test drives that could lead to oversteer.
 |
1967 Citroen DS19 Henri Chapron Serie 2 Cabriolet Conversion by Karl’s Autowerkstatt
443697
Lot 240038
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as absolutely stunning, particularly admiring the Gris Palladium color paired with a red leather interior. @Hawksmith finds it super cool, noting it looks great even while stationary. @boaboyoz praises the car as a thoroughly exquisite specimen, calling it very cool and expressing the cosmic timing of its appearance during a film documentary. Others, like @DSCitroen, highlight its rarity and unique design features, while @Hoppy18 calls it a gem. @LLynn finds it strikingly beautiful and appreciates the attention to detail in the car's design, further supported by the statements from @TrinityRestoration (The Seller) that confirm the car has no leaks and a mechanical steering system. Overall, the comments reflect a strong admiration for the car's elegance and design.
Neutral: The discussion around the car includes questions and clarifications about the differences between models, such as the distinctions between the DS19 and DS21. @m2711c and @56PackardMan provide insights into engine displacement differences, which is noted by several commenters. Further inquiries from @LLynn about technical aspects, including cycle time and steering details, were addressed by the seller. @Jaystreets observes the increasing frequency of Chapron vehicles being sold on the platform. Some comments such as those from @Biscotte57 touch on the rarity and collectible nature of the car, providing historical context but lacking emotional engagement with the model itself. There is a blend of factual discussion and curiosity about the car's features and history.
Negative: On the more critical side, @mcorrallo expresses concern that the color scheme of this particular vehicle may detract from its appeal compared to previous models. @Dollers comments on the high prices of convertible conversions, which may indicate concern over affordability or value. Additionally, @pursang mentions that the rear quarter panel looked more elegant on a previous model, suggesting that this version might not live up to the aesthetic expectations set by earlier designs. Overall, while the commentary indicates a general appreciation for the vehicle, there are some reservations about its design and pricing that could affect potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1966 Shelby GT350, praising it as an absolute icon and a time capsule. Users like @Dollycat3 noted how impressive it was that such a vehicle cost $3695.75 when new, while @johnnydarkgt350 highlighted the car's originality and collectible nature, calling it a lot of original Shelby. The seller, @ronjonesgarage, responded positively to all the interest, emphasizing the car's authenticity and remarkable history, further reaffirming that the engine is original and has been recently overhauled. Others like @Beans_Bacon and @Duprizzle commented on its stunning beauty and potential value, predicting it would fetch significant money in the market. The lively discussion around this GT350 shows the community's excitement and appreciation for such classic vehicles.
Neutral: Some comments raised questions about the vehicle's history and condition without being overtly negative. @fppiceo and @Santiam_Motor_Company highlighted concerns regarding the vehicle's replacement parts, specifically mentioning the inner fender and hood, and suggested the possibility of previous structural damage. Additionally, inquiries were made regarding the VIN tag and its current condition, indicating a need for transparency on the car's past. The seller engaged in the dialogue, affirming they would host an inspection to allow potential bidders to assess the vehicle in person. Overall, while the discussions were not overly critical, they showed that bidders are keen on understanding the car's full history and any potential issues.
Negative: However, several commenters expressed skepticism and concern about the car's integrity and history. Users like @CobraKid and @eldonchas pointed out that the absence of a Ford VIN under the Shelby tag raises red flags, suggesting that it could affect the car's value significantly. Concerns about possible past accidents were echoed by multiple users, like @CollectorCarClub, questioning whether the family had disclosed prior significant incidents, and @linderpat advising a physical inspection due to suspected frame damage. The overall sentiment reveals apprehension among potential bidders regarding undisclosed issues and the importance of transparency in the auction process, making some community members hesitant to commit. This discussion reflects the strong interest in maintaining the authenticity and value of such a classic vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its exceptional condition and aesthetic appeal. @boaboyoz describes it as a 'dynamite Frozen White Ford GT' and expresses admiration for its coolness, while @Dollycat3 simply states it is 'Absolutely superb.' @Plywood222222 also praises the car, noting the great starting bid, and @Micro912 asserts that it’s likely the top contender among American supercars. Additionally, multiple commenters express good wishes for the sale, reinforcing the sentiment of admiration for the vehicle's desirability and status.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a balanced view, focusing on specific features of the car and its history. @JHBBII notes the irony of the low mileage being driven by a well-known driver, while @Nafod addresses questions about the vehicle's operation and space suitability for taller drivers. @Streetside_Classics (The Seller) engages with potential buyers directly regarding height requirements, showing attentiveness to customer needs. @justaglitch mentions previous concerns about the seller's history in a non-judgmental manner, suggesting a nuanced perspective on the overall situation.
Negative: On the negative side, some comments raise concerns or skepticism about the vehicle's past and its limited use. @Schmidlack humorously points out the restraint of the previous owner, implying it may not have been driven to its full potential, while @OwenPoodiack hints at potential issues in the previous owner's life. @JustaGlitch raises doubts about the seller's credibility based on past experiences, reflecting caution among some commenters. Additionally, @Collins4A remarks on the car's mileage in a way that downplays its performance, suggesting it might be underappreciated in terms of its capabilities.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetics and overall build quality. @boaboyoz describes the Bronco as a 'bloody beauty' and compliments its gorgeous build. @Christmo agrees, stating that it has great wheels and looks fantastic, while @Ro_JaBoy expresses excitement over the possibility of @culpeper winning the auction. Additionally, @1911nineeleven (The Seller) highlights various features such as the power windows and heated seats, emphasizing that this Bronco has it all, which seems to enhance the positive perception among commentators.
Neutral: Several commenters are interested in specific features of the Bronco, demonstrating curiosity without strong bias. For instance, @joshua12345678910 inquires about a small hole in the dash, while @aredoubleyou asks about the body lift height and wheel width. Meanwhile, @Mhammo13 questions the consistency of the paint job on the driver's side door. These inquiries lead to informative replies from @1911nineeleven (The Seller), clarifying the details of the body lift and paint job, and indicating an effort to maintain transparency and engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: On the flip side, there are comments that suggest dissatisfaction with certain aspects of Bronco customizations. @idriveMine questions the choice of engine, expressing a preference for the Godzilla over the Coyote engine, reasoning that the Godzilla would provide better low-end torque and power. This comment hints at a missed opportunity for what some feel could have been an upgraded option, signaling that not all responses were overwhelmingly positive regarding the build choices.
|
 |
Positive: @stugottz expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetic, particularly noting the stylish combination of the red top and black exterior. They found it to embody pure style and class. @fc2 shared a positive experience, mentioning how driving through tunnels made them forget they were in a Rolls Royce, highlighting the car's beauty.
Neutral: @GLWTA and @drbrett1 both requested additional information about the vehicle's features, such as videos demonstrating the power top, doors, and trunk functionality. @speedy74 inquired about the ownership history, asking if the car had multiple owners. @Jmurez78 asked about the presence of paint protection film (PPF) on the car's exterior. @iLussoOC (The Seller) responded to these inquiries, indicating that an update would be provided and confirming the absence of PPF on the Dawn.
Negative: Comments did not express significant negative opinions about the vehicle. However, @drbrett1's follow-up on the requested video may suggest a sense of impatience or frustration regarding delayed responses from the seller.
|
 |
Positive: The comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive restoration and design. @Ribman (The Seller) mentions that the Nova has undergone a professional restoration, noting its pristine condition and functionality. Commenters such as @JayKay2430 and @70_duster praise the striking color and details, with @tminer emphasizing how thrilling it is to drive, given its lightweight and powerful engine options. The car's award for Concours Gold at MCACN in 2017 further enhances its appeal, indicating a strong value appreciation over time.
Neutral: Several users are curious and engaged about specific details of the Nova's features and history. @BangScreech442 asks for documentation on the car's history while @cplains inquires about the vehicle's condition and restoration specifics. The vehicle's modifications have sparked discussion, with some suggesting alternative looks that could be more appealing esthetically, such as installing body-colored rims and black steelies, though these modifications are seen as potentially diminishing its historical value.
Negative: There are comments expressing concerns or desires for further information. @elchinero suggests modifications that could alter the car's aesthetics or performance, which @CarFoolLane argues may destroy its value. Additionally, some commenters raise questions about the car's components, such as the absence of a passenger-side mirror and specifics regarding the build plate. Overall, while many appreciate the car's condition, the inquiries suggest lingering doubts about its originality and detailed history.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its nostalgic appeal and excellent condition. @spoonek's comment about it being 'minty fresh' set a positive tone, while @keegnallee and @zdoctor praised not only the car's aesthetics but also shared memories associated with similar models. @yellowc7vert expressed that out of a selection of iconic cars, this one stood out as the best-looking, reinforcing its allure. Additional comments from @Mtan123 (The Seller) showed appreciation for these positive remarks, thanking participants for sharing their thoughts and experiences, which further enhanced the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects and inquiries related to the vehicle. @sattman voiced concerns about potential issues with the car's features, prompting a detailed response from @Mtan123 (The Seller) assuring that everything operates as intended. Other users, such as @thegasmaster and @A321, brought up technical specifications and parts compatibility, indicating ongoing interest in the car's condition and features. This type of commentary suggested a practical side to the enthusiasm surrounding the vehicle, where potential buyers were actively engaged in discussions about its specifications and service history.
Negative: There were a few critical remarks mentioning possible flaws and areas of concern regarding the car. @sattman questioned the functionality of various features, while @rassels101 noted a minor detail that diverged from the original specifications. Comments like these highlighted the car's history, including previous repairs and the importance of maintaining components like the windshield and struts. @Mtan123 (The Seller) addressed these concerns directly, explaining the car's maintenance and previous ownership to alleviate some of the worries expressed by potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @FredFlintstone praised the vehicle as "True American Muscle!" while @RMF_452 complimented its aesthetic appeal, stating it’s one of the best 67 Shelby fastbacks he has seen recently. @bstyles acknowledged the car's verification in the Shelby Registry, confirming its interesting backstory of being left at a service station. @funkaholik agreed on the beauty of the car and its original color, Lime Gold, which is a rare find in the current market. Overall, numerous comments highlighted the car's striking appearance, restoration quality, and its significance as a classic muscle car.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the verification of the vehicle and its registration issues. @KICKINGTIRES pointed out a discrepancy in the listing, noting that the car was registered as a 1967 Shelby GT550 with a reproduction plate, while @bringatrailer confirmed this registration error, stating it has been corrected back to GT350. Questions about the original Shelby tag being removed were raised by @CollectorCarClub and addressed by @bstyles and @BossCars302 (The Seller), who explained the tag's absence and provided insight into the vehicle's hidden VIN and original parts.
Negative: While many were enthusiastic about the vehicle, @no.radar expressed sadness over the car's history of abandonment and remarked on the unfortunate circumstance of being left unattended. Some commenters, like @TLea and @Dwait, hinted at the car's mixed parts situation, including possible replacements with later models. @LittlePieces questioned the authenticity of certain components, concerned that the hood might have been replaced with a different variant, indicating a lack of confidence in the vehicle's originality among certain buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, noting its rarity and low mileage. @WebsterMotorCo highlighted the car's exceptional condition and praised the seller, encouraging potential buyers to bid confidently. @Severx13 chimed in with a positive testimonial about their experience with the seller, calling the Pajero Evolution impressive and emphasizing the high quality of vehicles he brings in. @RenownUSA also complimented the car's appearance, specifically mentioning how it looks impressive with its wheels.
Neutral: Several users asked practical questions regarding the vehicle's features. @TGwjacod-akota inquired about the rear seats, asking if they can fold flat or be removed for his dogs. @Collectorsupport raised concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly about the timing belt, and requested videos demonstrating the 4WD system. @Lorenba provided some preliminary measurements of the rear seats, contributing useful information to @TGwjacod-akota's questions. The seller, @Stevan43, responded to these inquiries with detailed answers and promised to provide more information soon.
Negative: Despite the overall enthusiasm, there were some concerns raised by commenters. @996gt2 questioned a noise heard at higher speeds, suspecting it could be due to wheel bearings or tires, while @LoveThemWazzuCougs asked about the vehicle's history with smoking, indicating a common concern for buyers of used imports. The seller responded to these issues, clarifying that the noise was merely tire noise and confirming that the car has not been smoked in, but potential issues regarding road noise could still be a drawback for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its reliability and performance, with @stevieboy1 sharing that their previous 2006 model achieved an impressive 40 mpg on the highway. @saphiro also highlighted the quality of these road cars, stating that they have driven one with 340,000 miles without issue, emphasizing confidence in the drivetrain irrespective of mileage. Additionally, @RbeckC5 (The Seller) provided assurance regarding the vehicle's maintenance, mentioning recent replacements of motor and transmission mounts, and confirming that all features are in good working order with no warning lights present.
Neutral: Some commenters sought additional details about the vehicle's condition, including @nps54 who asked about the age of the battery and requested information about any error messages. They also inquired about the spare tire and sunroof recall status. @windsurf requested clarification about past accidents and the cause of wheel corrosion, noting that the vehicle's underside appeared clean, leading to confusion about the wheel condition. @RbeckC5 (The Seller) addressed these inquiries by confirming the battery's recent date code and mentioning the open recall for the sunroof, along with the presence of corrosion on the wheels due to road conditions without specific details about the accident history.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's history and minor damages from past accidents. @windsurf specifically requested information about repairs due to an accident, indicating a desire for transparency about potential issues. Additionally, while the overall sentiment seemed positive, @stevieboy1 cautioned bidders to be aware that while the vehicle is capable of reaching significant mileage, it could encounter problems, suggesting that potential buyers should be vigilant about long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH admires the truck's patina and design, appreciating the classic square body and manual transmission while praising the seller's efforts. @EC396 considers the truck perfect and plans to keep an eye on it, while @DouglasArthur expresses his support for the V8 configuration and confirms the truck is a K10. @Daniel_H finds the truck intimidating, comparing its look to brass knuckles. Furthermore, @Laverdude states that this truck is everything needed, reinforcing the positive sentiments in the comments.
Neutral: Several users discuss aspects of the truck's categorization, with @MutualBill and @DouglasArthur debating the K10 versus C10 labeling. @BHBL27 provides historical context about the designation changes that occurred in 1987, adding clarity to the discussion. @evilmeyer7320 inquires about the functionality of the power windows and locks, and @UncleSamsTrenchGun discusses the implications of removing the lift kit regarding tire replacement, showcasing a practical interest in modifications.
Negative: Despite the overall positive and neutral responses, there is some confusion around the truck's specifications. @Opus993 suggests a correction on the V10 reference, while @grmfgj asks about engine idling and reliability, hinting at potential concerns. Additionally, @OwassoAlex asks about the truck's driveability to Tulsa, reflecting a cautious interest in long-distance performance.
|
 |
Positive: @R9Garage finds the patchwork on the floor of the vehicle to be a creative approach, indicating a positive view of the seller's ingenuity. @Bomar adds to this commentary by suggesting the presence of $2,000 Vogue tires on the vehicle makes it a great deal at the current asking price of $5,000. This reflects an appreciation for both the tires and the overall value of the vehicle in its current state.
Neutral: @Rweiss6 expresses concern about the age of the tires, asking whether they are more than 23 years old and whether the seller can assist in mounting them. @WLACA requests additional images of the dash, indicating interest in the vehicle's interior details and functionality. The seller, @mcqueens, responds positively, providing more pictures and information about the tires and the vehicle's operational features.
Negative: @Aktifspeed counters @mcqueens' claim regarding the tire condition, arguing that tires over 23 years old are not in good shape for driving. @DCampi1 raises questions about the functionality of the vehicle's AC and electrical systems, as well as commenting on a concern about the fuse box and riveted floor patches. @Spartanman criticizes the unusual wheels and tires, suggesting that sellers often overlook buyers' desire for classic styles, indicating a disconnect between the vehicle's presentation and buyer expectations.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the beauty and excellent condition of the vehicle, particularly @Ron457's remark about it being a beautiful car and @Streeter's praise for the dash cover. @Bajasur emphasized the car's quality by noting it was selected for display at a local BMW dealer's grand opening. Commenters like @grb1 and @Best_Of_Show expressed nostalgia for similar cars they've owned, reinforcing the vehicle's appeal as a collector's item and a joy to drive.
Neutral: Several comments seek clarifications about various features of the car, such as @02Les requesting trunk photos and @Bajasur asking about engine compression numbers. @SullivanAutoHouse responded to these inquiries, providing details about the sunroof's functionality and the engine's recent rebuild. The community engagement reflects curiosity about the vehicle's specifics, while @aircooled-coupe-guy's question about fog light placement indicated interest in the car's modifications.
Negative: Some users expressed concerns about aesthetic aspects of the car, particularly regarding its bumpers. @nodriveraids remarked that the car sits too high and suggested changing the bumpers, indicating they view the DOT bumpers as unattractive. @Caymanorcarrera and @JRG99 both shared strong opinions against modifying the car's bumpers, highlighting a divide among enthusiasts about the vehicle's design choices. Additionally, @BangScreech442 raised a point about the bidding's lackluster performance possibly being affected by the reproduction data tag.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed a positive appreciation for the Airstream Trade Wind, highlighting its beauty and quality. @Dollycat3 stated it was 'Absolutely beautiful' and ready for adventure, while @Pesmth shared their own positive experience with Airstreams, affirming their quality. Furthermore, @vintagevehicle encouraged active use of the Airstream, emphasizing the enjoyment and freedom that comes from traveling in it rather than merely using it as a decorative piece.
Neutral: Others in the comments inquired about specific details related to the trailer, indicating a desire for more information to aid their evaluations. @kukaepe and @ATLgt sought clarification on the weight and dimensions of the Airstream, with @1600veloce, the seller, promptly addressing these questions. Such queries reflect a practical interest in the trailer's specifications rather than a strong emotional response.
Negative: On the other hand, some comments reflected minor criticisms or concerns regarding the trailer. @beefareeno asked about the absence of a bed, and @Frankieballs expressed irritation over the brevity of video content used in listings, suggesting a preference for more comprehensive presentations. These comments hint at some dissatisfaction or confusion among potential buyers that could detract from the overall appeal of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle for its unique features and intimidating presence. @boaboyoz referred to it as 'the coolest vehicle on BaT' and noted it is 'way too cool for school.' @Tomcat54 (The Seller) highlighted its massive dimensions and the distinctive aspects like the rear turret and the armored bodywork, asserting that there are very few like it left in the U.S. Comments such as @DatsunZGuy's desire for 'total domination in the Costco parking lot' and @Tripledigit's suggestion of parking it on the front lawn as an alternative to a guard dog reflect the vehicle's perceived superiority and deterrent potential against threats. Overall, the comments convey admiration for its military history and presence.
Neutral: In addition to positive remarks, some comments simply recognized the vehicle's capabilities or inquired about specifics. @RichieNH1 asked if it could drive on roads in NH, showcasing curiosity about its practicality. @PWSchuh humorously suggested that intimidation might help in traffic, whereas @Hoppy18 made a light-hearted note about its intimidating nature in social situations. There were also technical discussions about the vehicle, such as @pbf777's inquiries regarding the armor's material and the military specifications like gun calibration shared by @Flemgunner and @Assam. These comments contributed to a broader understanding of the vehicle without overtly praising or criticizing it.
Negative: Some comments expressed skepticism regarding the vehicle's use, with @richardlava humorously declaring, 'Don’t touch my vines!!' suggesting the vehicle's intimidating potential was not always welcome. @fka_ray mentioned that while it was not the fastest on the freeway, it helped address tailgater concerns, implicitly criticizing its speed. @Scott raised questions about the potential misrepresentation of the vehicle's condition, expressing doubts about the integrity of the armored bodywork and compliance with importation regulations. These negative notes highlight a mix of humor and concern about the practicality and legitimacy of the vehicle's features.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed enthusiasm about the 996 Cabriolet, highlighting its combination of unique features and well-documented history. @Lesr3204 noted that these early models provide an excellent analog driving experience, praising the convertible aspect and the included hardtop. @Jwaydog also pointed out the value of the detailed service records, which showcases the previous owners' commitment to maintenance, stating that such documentation is rare. Overall, the engagement from the seller, @UBMotorCo, has been well-received, with buyers appreciating the transparency and thoroughness in sharing information about the car.
Neutral: Some comments reflected curiosity and requests for clarification regarding specific details of the vehicle. For instance, @stone questioned the timing of the oil analysis in relation to the oil change, wanting to ensure accurate interpretations of the engine's condition. @BB510 asked if the car comes with an oil filler cap, and @Dizkid inquired about a paint reading anomaly. The seller addressed these questions confidently, offering additional insights and updates, which seemed to satisfy the commenters seeking more detailed information.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's condition and prior usage, with some commenters like @slsalt14 spotting surface scratches on the hardtop and asking about a potential dent in a specific photo. @stratguy commented on the car's driving videos, noting clunky responses over bumps, which raised questions about the suspension's integrity. Additionally, @dlef expressed concern over the car not being driven much in recent years, asking whether this led to significant maintenance issues. @UBMotorCo was transparent regarding these concerns, indicating a minor suspension issue but reassuring bidders of the overall well-kept state of the car.
|
 |
Positive: @Mattliv85 (The Seller) expresses confidence in the quality of the bike, stating it has never been dropped and that the scuff on the saddlebag is minor, caused by their child. Multiple commenters, including @RedRon, suggest that the scuff can be easily buffed out, indicating that it isn't a serious flaw. @bringatrailer appreciates the seller's prompt communication regarding the lien status and confirms that it has been updated, adding to the positive experience for potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters like @gman111111 and @JakeDob are curious about the bike's design choices, questioning how the scuff occurred and why the square headlight was chosen over the more iconic round one. @cdjcn seeks clarification on the lien status, which leads to informative exchanges between the seller and various users about the bike's features and service history. The seller also explains his reason for selling the bike, citing family activities and shifting interests.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns or confusion about the bike's history, including the mention of a lien, which @cdjcn points out seems contradictory in the seller's description. Some commenters, like @taz178, share worries about the bike's comfort level, specifically about the handlebar style and whether original parts are available. Overall, while some commenters show uncertainty regarding specifics, the seller makes efforts to clarify these points.
|
Original-Owner Modified 2010 Subaru Impreza WRX Hatchback
JF1GH7G62AG806270
Lot 240269
Private Party
 |
Positive: @NVGT350 expressed excitement about the narrow body hatch returning, signaling a strong interest in the vehicle. @Discobob playfully referred to the vehicle as a "Nice wagon," suggesting an overall appreciation for its design. @ShiroTheHiro reminisced fondly about their past experience with a similar model, praising its simplicity and direct driving experience, indicating that they would be eager to bid on this one, showcasing genuine enthusiasm for the vehicle.
Neutral: @WRX-Guy (The Seller) provided informative responses to potential buyers, sharing details about the car's capabilities, including the possibility of adjustments needed for California emissions compliance. They also indicated that the sale would include various OEM parts from the car's build, which adds perceived value for prospective buyers. The seller posted multiple driving and cold start videos to give interested parties a clear understanding of the vehicle's performance.
Negative: @rcrowder raised a concern about the vehicle's sale to a California buyer, questioning why a private party might face challenges in that regard, reflecting apprehension around state regulations. @JustinHorning inquired about the mileage since the engine rebuild, hinting at possible concerns regarding the vehicle's usage. These questions reflect a level of skepticism among potential buyers about the car's readiness and legality for certain states.
|
 |
Positive: The 2008 Cadillac XLR is receiving high praise from the community for its striking finish in Crystal Red Tintcoat, with @OldsRocketMan calling it the best color combo. @VCaddy shared a positive firsthand experience after visiting the car, noting its cosmetic beauty inside and out, along with smooth driving dynamics. The vehicle's rarity as one of only 288 built in this color combination, combined with its low mileage, has caught the attention of bidders like @Daniel_H, who expressed strong interest in the auction.
Neutral: The seller, @greenerdays11, provided detailed insights about the car's service history and maintenance, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's condition and offering clarification regarding tire specifications. They addressed questions raised by @waytoomanycarsshesays and @mcowboy711 about the car's features and inspections, confirming it passed a multi-point inspection without issues. The possibility of extended road trips was also discussed, with the seller recommending new tires due to the original ones' age despite their good tread depth.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific features of the XLR, such as @rmalzo questioning the retractable top's functionality. @VCaddy pointed out discrepancies regarding the tire brand originally mentioned, prompting a correction from @greenerdays11. While overall sentiment is positive, discussions like these reveal the community's desire for transparency and accuracy when considering a luxury vehicle like the XLR.
|
 |
Positive: @crossram1950 reminisced about the fun experience of driving an identical car from the 70's, highlighting its appeal and nostalgia. @1889 expressed admiration for the Pantera, specifically noting the original silver finish on the 17” wheels as a beautiful detail. @S38Bruce praised the car for its beauty and maintenance, indicating a high level of care by the seller, @tomgs, who shared his pride and extensive history with the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the modifications and repairs the vehicle has undergone, particularly regarding the engine change from original number #1816 to a different Pantera engine #2661. @MikeDrew explained the potential details behind this change and reassured the seller and buyers that such modifications are common and do not necessarily diminish the car's value. The seller, @tomgs, acknowledged the uncertainty regarding the engine's history and provided information about the car's mileage and maintenance since its rebuild in 1990.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about certain aspects of the vehicle. @Leverone mentioned that the frunk lid seemed misaligned and questioned whether the car had experienced front-end damage, to which @tomgs confirmed there had been none. @Panteralee pointed out that the tires were quite old and recommended replacement. Additionally, @Yellow454 inquired about the non-functional A/C, indicating possible overheating issues during traffic, suggesting there may be additional areas needing attention.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's build quality and aesthetics, with @Joseesq calling it a great example. @Tahoe013 found the build sweeter than most, while @boaboyoz described it as a bodacious and spicy build. @Discobob praised the seller for creating wonderful listing videos, highlighting the vehicle's color and motor, suggesting it would perform exceptionally well in the auction. In general, the overall feedback indicated a strong appreciation for the craftsmanship of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several users raised questions and points of clarification regarding specifics about the vehicle's title and emissions compliance. @RustBucketList inquired about the touchscreen head unit, expressing some confusion about its appearance. @WAGONBOYTD mentioned an issue with registration in California, indicating that the car's acceptance would be problematic based on its title. @teambrd sought additional details regarding the vehicle's build, title mismatches, and other relevant documentation, demonstrating a proactive approach to understanding the vehicle's history and registration.
Negative: There were some negative notes regarding the vehicle, particularly concerning its compliance with California emission regulations. @WAGONBOYTD asserted the likelihood of the vehicle not being cleared for registration in California or Illinois due to its title as a 2014 LR2, implying a potential misclassification. Additionally, @axelgonzalez criticized the wheels on the vehicle, labeling them as horrible, which reflects dissatisfaction in a specific aspect of the build.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the 2008 Mustang Bullitt. @Motoralong19 describes it as a "nice example of a clean driver," which evokes nostalgia for their own previous Bullitt. @Daniel_H appreciates the subtle details of the car, noting features like the throwback gauges and gas filler, while @Longmire45 shares a joyful experience of driving their own Bullitt across the country, highlighting the car's balance and performance. Overall, the shared enthusiasm and fond recollections of the Bullitt series reflect a strong community connection among enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several users, including @Batfan2 and @EddyB6, raise clarifying questions about the vehicle, focusing on minor concerns regarding its condition and specifications. @EddyB6 inquires about potential rust and the state of the car's undercarriage, while @Indy_030 asks if the AC and stock exhaust system are functioning properly. @HondaChief provides a practical tip about battery care that resonates with Bullitt owners, indicating a shared concern for maintenance. The seller, @JLROY, responds to these inquiries thoughtfully, indicating a willingness to ensure transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: A few comments hint at concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @Batfan2 mentions the high mileage and less than pristine state, suggesting it may attract budget-conscious buyers. Furthermore, @Markflores73 points out a potential oil spot, prompting @JLROY (the seller) to clarify it is not an oil leak but a residue from cleaning. @EddyB6 expresses concerns over the vehicle's rust potential due to its Florida location, seeking more detailed images of the undercarriage. This shows an underlying caution among some commenters regarding the car's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: @JOKER66 appreciates the simplicity of the truck, while @Daniel_H finds it visually appealing and functional, feeling motivated to work with it. @PDXBryan expresses admiration for the truck, noting it as a wonderful vehicle. Overall, many commentors seem to be impressed with the truck's aesthetics and purpose, highlighting its straightforward design.
Neutral: Several commentors have posed practical questions regarding the truck's specifics. @VintageIron1 requests detailed pictures and information regarding the glow plugs, while @topcopper286 and @Conti1 inquire about the bed's capabilities and shipping options. @bavarian-as asks for dimensions of the bed and details about the fuel tank, indicating a cautious interest in understanding more about the truck's features.
Negative: @cmnov12 expresses concern over the truck's condition, particularly the dents on the bed and potential issues with the cab, while also inquiring about the vehicle's prior use. @JVolt18 raised suspicions of shill bidding related to the auction process, although later apologized after confirming the legitimacy of the seller's claims. These negative comments reflect doubts and skepticism about the vehicle's condition and the auction's transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @ChrisMustian shared his heartfelt connection to the truck, indicating it has been a long-term project that required considerable time and investment. His pride in the work done on the vehicle is evident, suggesting that the truck is not just a piece of machinery but something he has poured himself into. He even likens the process of selling it to letting go of a family member, highlighting the emotional bond he has formed with it over the years.
Neutral: @WX8 asked a straightforward question regarding the truck's drivetrain, inquiring whether it is two-wheel or four-wheel drive. @ChrisMustian promptly responded that the truck is two-wheel drive, providing clarity to potential bidders regarding its capabilities. Another user, @EKP, expressed curiosity about the truck's original color, suggesting an interest in its history and appearance before modifications or restorations were made.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle present in the discussion. The questions posed by other users appear to be focused on gathering information rather than criticism, and @ChrisMustian's responses are welcoming and informative, indicating a positive interaction.
|
 |
Positive: @Daniel_H shared their enthusiasm for the vehicle, describing it as fun and practical, mentioning how it can serve as a good hunting rig. They reminisced about a past experience selling a similar model to a thoughtful young man who planned to restore it, highlighting the vehicle's potential for sentimental value and memories.
Neutral: @Don1959 inquired about the availability of the California title and license plate for the vehicle, suggesting a standard procedure for potential buyers regarding vehicle registration documentation. @Impala-Bill (The Seller) confirmed that the previous sale fell through due to the buyer's failure to pay, indicating that the vehicle is still available for purchase.
Negative: @cincycaddy expressed concern about the reliability of the sale, referencing the failed transaction from the previous listing. This comment raises questions about the seller's credibility and the likelihood of a smooth transaction for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong sense of nostalgia and appreciation for the vehicle, with @Dashing_Darwin noting that the Tahoe has served as a faithful family companion. @Firehawk202 praises the vehicle, calling it very clean and expressing hope to bring it home to Texas. The seller, @ElMaj, provides detailed information about the vehicle's history and service, highlighting its care over the years and maintaining that it has never been smoked in, reinforcing its clean condition. The overall sentiment reflects positivity towards the Tahoe's performance and its role in family memories.
Neutral: The seller, @ElMaj, responded to various inquiries about the vehicle, sharing specific details such as the engine hours being recorded at a surprisingly low 587.8 hours and explaining possible reasons for this. The seller also addressed questions regarding vehicle maintenance, clarifying that all service repairs throughout its lifetime were performed by professionals. Additionally, they provided insights into the alignment process related to the change of wheels, indicating that the original alignment was conducted with the stock wheels before the upgrade to larger ones.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns, such as @DLH250 inquiring about alignment following the change to larger wheels, expressing skepticism about the lack of a new alignment report. @Tcurrent questioned if there had been any significant mechanical issues, such as a coolant leak, hinting at potential past issues despite the seller's assurances. Furthermore, there were ongoing questions about the towing history of the Tahoe, with @ElMaj detailing a very limited towing experience, which hints that the vehicle may not have been heavily utilized for its capabilities.
|
Original-Owner Modified 2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon 6-Speed
1C4HJWFG1DL545149
Lot 240279
Private Party
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its excellent condition and the significant investment made by the owner. @Colin, a long-time friend of the owner, emphasizes the care and modifications put into the Jeep, assuring prospective buyers of its capabilities and the confidence they can have in their purchase. @jtc722 appreciates the vehicle's well-kept appearance, further reinforcing the notion that it has been loved and maintained over the years. @jvaldezSB, the seller, confirms the presence of full-sized metal doors and a robust air conditioning system, reassuring buyers that it is prepared for adventures in various climates.
Neutral: Several commenters have sought clarification on the vehicle's components and performance, reflecting their genuine interest in understanding its specifics. @Armanjpl inquires about the clutch and its performance, while @Heltzelc raises a question regarding the air conditioning's effectiveness if a top is added. @mjhiggs also asks about the availability of a hard or soft top for the Jeep. @hatrick2112 voices concerns about potential mechanical issues, such as leaks and past repairs, indicating a thorough consideration of the Jeep’s overall functionality and maintenance history. @jvaldezSB answers many of these inquiries with detailed explanations about the vehicle's mechanical integrity and upgrades.
Negative: On the downside, some comments suggest a need for caution regarding the vehicle's history. @hatrick2112 asks specific questions about possible leaks, the state of the ball joints, and rust exposure, which indicates some apprehension about the vehicle's condition despite the seller's reassurances. Additionally, there were mentions of previous ownership and modifications, which might raise concerns for potential buyers regarding the vehicle's original integrity and reliability. Overall, while the positive aspects of the Jeep shine through, some skepticism remains among interested parties regarding its past and current state.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's beauty and condition. @WorldofWayne mentioned the comfort of the seats, while @Hoppy18 referred to the car as a treat for BaT users due to its unique ownership history. @jsanchez001 highlighted the remarkable amount of documentation that comes with the car, and @drivemelucky (The Seller) stated that the car was kept in excellent condition and has only been driven minimally, reinforcing its collectible status.
Neutral: Some discussions revolved around the car's connection to @Steve Davis, with comments reflecting varying familiarity with his reputation in the automotive community. @MDW66 provided context about Davis's role in Barrett Jackson, while @Caymanorcarrera noted that pedigree and prior ownership are significant in determining the car's value. There were also comments about the car's auctioning process and how the choice to list it on BaT over Barrett-Jackson was seen as a positive exploration by the seller.
Negative: However, not all feedback was positive, as several users pointed out potential issues with the vehicle's condition and authenticity. @Gopher428 and @jr07621 noted concerns regarding the undercarriage color being incorrect and other parts not meeting the original specifications. @69SCJ70 and @snolanc2 also advised caution, warning that features such as axles and original markings may not align with factory standards. Comments from @gtabert and others encouraged due diligence and thorough research before considering any bids, emphasizing that while the car is appealing, it may not reach top-dollar status without addressing these inconsistencies.
|
 |
Positive: @Hdecker83 (The Seller) actively engages with potential buyers, offering to provide additional information and pictures of the vehicle. They assure potential buyers that the truck runs and drives fantastic, emphasizing its functionality with comments like 'it runs like a top and everything works.' This proactive communication and willingness to share driving videos is positively received by buyers looking for reassurance about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Comments show a desire for additional content related to the vehicle, with @bschneids83 requesting videos of the truck in action, including cold start and driving footage. @Hdecker83 acknowledges the requests but mentions delays due to being out of town, indicating a commitment to fulfilling buyer requests as best as possible. The conversation reflects a typical back-and-forth between a seller and potential buyers, focusing on logistics of media sharing.
Negative: A concern is raised by @CanolaCowboy about the key shown in the videos being a remake, indicating potential issues with authenticity or completeness of the vehicle's features. This raises a red flag for some potential buyers, as missing original keys can affect perceived value and trust in the sale. However, no direct negative comments about the vehicle's performance are noted beyond this concern.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 1971 Mercedes-Benz 280SL, highlighting its beautiful color combination of silver and black, as well as its elegant and timeless design. @Caymanorcarrera and @Maxwell077 both conveyed excitement about the vehicle's aesthetics, with @Caymanorcarrera emphasizing its originality and underlining the significance of its straight-six engine. @Daynetrain55 referred to the car as 'timeless,' resonating with others who appreciate the classic appeal of this model.
Neutral: . Several users inquired about specific features and conditions of the vehicle, including the functionality of electronics and gauges. @carlover57 sought clarification on whether all functions were working properly, which @Stathios (The Seller) addressed by encouraging interested buyers to check the detailed gallery and video provided. @gullwing71 raised questions about the car's mileage and history, while @Capitanron provided insights into the overall condition, suggesting the vehicle may need cosmetic attention despite its positive aspects.
Negative: Conversely, there were some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @Capitanron pointed out potential issues regarding the car's undercarriage, corrosion, and repainting history, suggesting that these factors could affect the overall value. Additionally, @Stathios (The Seller) acknowledged that while the service history provided was limited to recent years, it is crucial to have compression readings for a better evaluation of the car's mechanics. This reflects a cautious approach among some commenters regarding the vehicle's maintenance and future restoration needs.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive build and aesthetic appeal. @boaboyoz referred to the Camaro as a "rockstar" and praised the seller, indicating a positive experience with them. @adamccz33 expressed love for the car overall, while @70_duster noted that the LS engine paired with a six-speed manual transmission was a great update. Additionally, @Tigers196884 remarked on the added value of the RS grille, and multiple commenters, such as @Vintage1958 and @Intimidator04, were struck by its overall beauty and the effort that went into the build, with @tlcamg even mentioning an affinity for the vehicle alongside their scale model collection.
Neutral: A few commenters sought more information or clarified certain aspects regarding the vehicle. @Terrymarkham inquired about potential issues with the trunk, but the seller, @nexusautobrokers, assured that it was not leaking. There was also discussion about the correct model designation, with @markcubs18 highlighting confusion around whether the car was an RS or SS, while @Jerryray provided clarification based on the trim tags. The seller confirmed that the car is indeed an RS/SS combination, showcasing the community's involvement in ensuring accurate information about the vehicle.
Negative: Some commenters shared critiques about certain features, particularly about the interior design. @adamccz33 stated that the interior was not to their style, while @bcurtis5280 mentioned that the interior had too much red and suggested a preference for a black dash. Overall, while these comments reflected personal preferences, they did not detract significantly from the overall positive reception of the vehicle, as the seller, @nexusautobrokers, noted these concerns were easily addressable with their in-house upholstery department.
|
 |
Positive: @RCSmith (The Seller) shared that the convertible top operates well and provided two videos showcasing its functionality. He noted that although the top works smoothly, it will require lubrication, which he plans to address. This reflects a proactive approach to maintaining the vehicle, ensuring potential buyers see it in good working order.
Neutral: Comments indicated that obtaining better visuals of certain aspects, like the blemish near the left mirror, could be beneficial for bidders. @Markflores73 and @bo9090 raised inquiries regarding the car's maintenance, including the IMS bearing upgrade and a mysterious puddle shown in a video. @MTstan provided insight into the IMS bearing issue based on analysis and shared their own positive experience with a similar model, which illustrates the varying perspectives on vehicle maintenance and reliability.
Negative: Concerns arose from @bo9090, who pointed out what appeared to be oil underneath the car in the video titled "underneath rear," prompting questions about potential leaks. @Markflores73 also inquired about the extent of care the vehicle has received, expressing apprehension over the IMS bearing not being upgraded. @RCSmith (The Seller) addressed some of these issues, asserting that there are no leaks, but concerns about the condition of the vehicle still linger.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @amotorsports, provided clarity on various concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's condition. They confirmed that the factory air suspension is still intact and has addressed minor cosmetic issues with professional touch-ups. Additionally, the seller assures that the timing belt kit has been installed, increasing buyer confidence in the vehicle's maintenance history.
Neutral: Several prospective buyers, including @OnePuddleUnder and @Tbeanstalk77, asked relevant questions about the vehicle's suspension, timing belt, and water pump, indicating a keen interest in the vehicle's functionality and overall condition. They also sought additional information about the vehicle's location and photos of the air suspension in action, suggesting a desire for transparency before making a purchasing decision.
Negative: There were concerns expressed by @Gageprop regarding the condition of the third-row seat, which seemed uneven in the pictures. Additionally, @NotThatShane pointed out the absence of responses to some questions posed earlier in the comments, indicating a communication gap that might deter potential buyers. Overall, the seller's delay in addressing all inquiries could create uncertainty among prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments reflect positively on the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and performance. @boaboyoz described the 991.2 C4S coupe as a 'lovely sight in white' and praised it as a wonderful example, thanks to a legendary @seller. Similarly, @Fpsocean remarked on the car's beauty and speed, expressing contentment despite having a different model. @911r (The Seller) provided additional information about features, confirming the presence of Apple CarPlay and the clean interior, which was acknowledged by @DCC55 as well. Overall, the appreciation for the car's overall condition and features sets a positive tone among commenters.
Neutral: Some comments posed practical questions regarding specific details of the vehicle without expressing a clear positive or negative stance. @AeroSmith inquired about the availability of CarPlay in the 2017 models, while @mistermayor asked about space for golf clubs, which @911r (The Seller) addressed directly. Concerns were raised about the vehicle's tires by @michaelnelsen, highlighting their age, but this was met with assurance from @911r (The Seller) regarding assistance in replacing them. Additionally, inquiries about the service records by @njsfx showed a concern for maintenance, though no verdict on the vehicle's condition was rendered.
Negative: Concerns emerged regarding the vehicle's odometer mileage and mechanical aspects. @Fpsocean initiated a query about the odometer possibly indicating changed mileage, leading to a debate among commenters about its accuracy. While @Crocofantu1979 defended the car's single ownership, the original concern remained prominent. @michaelnelsen pointed out the age of the front tires, suggesting they should be replaced, adding to a sense of caution for potential buyers. Furthermore, @DCC55 questioned the sound of the turbo, hinting at possible tuning issues, and @Shugg124 suggested the vehicle might have undergone modifications that could impact its performance. Overall, these negative comments reflect uncertainty about the car's condition and maintenance.
|
5.3L Vortec–Powered 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe 5-Speed
13537MLDS02340
Lot 240285
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @Atfz01 describing it as a 'dream car.' The seller, @nrcIII, provided reassuring information, stating that all the gauges work properly and that there is no issue with tire rub when turning or going over bumps. This indicates overall confidence in the car's functionality and condition.
Neutral: A few comments sought additional information about the vehicle's specs. @cc-fl inquired about the dyno results and color code, while asking for a video of the car running. @jmcq1 wanted to know what modifications had been made to the sound system, and @ndamiani01 asked if all the gauges worked, which @nrcIII confirmed.
Negative: There were some points of uncertainty mentioned, particularly regarding the absence of dyno sheets, which @nrcIII noted he no longer has. Additionally, questions about the color of the car raised some confusion, with @cc-fl indicating that it did not appear to be the expected cranberry red. Overall, the lack of certain requested information might leave some potential buyers wanting more assurance.
|
 |
Positive: The 2004 Jeep Wrangler SE is described as a fun and lightweight vehicle that is ideal for adventurous drives. @c6dino (The Seller) mentions the joy of owning this Jeep, highlighting its simplicity and readiness for top-off driving. The owner has taken good care of the vehicle, ensuring it is ready for its next adventure. The clean title and the Jeep's expected performance and appearance for its age have been favorably noted.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the vehicle's features and capabilities. @AZKrunch asked about the air conditioning, to which @c6dino responded confirming its presence and indicating an update would be made to the listing. @castle53 inquired about flat towing capabilities, and @c6dino clarified that the Wrangler can indeed be flat-towed with all four wheels on the ground without needing a dolly, providing detailed instructions on how to do so.
Negative: A concern was raised regarding the vehicle's history, as @c6dino mentioned a Carfax report indicating one accident during the first owner's time, but without further details. While the current owner sees no signs of major issues, the small dent above the fuel filler cap is noted as the only remaining imperfection. This could potentially raise questions for some buyers about the overall condition and history of the Jeep.
|
 |
Positive: The excitement from @RundeepResources, the seller, sets a positive tone for the auction of the 958.2 GTS, describing it as a unique stunner and the best of breed. The car is presented as a last year, heavily optioned model in a striking Carmine red color, with significant investment in features amounting to over $16k. Several comments express appreciation for the car’s aesthetics, with @Paularno highlighting the appealing color combination and @Frosty admiring the beauty of the vehicle in Carmine Red. Additionally, @RundeepResources emphasizes the car's excellent condition, noting that it has been meticulously maintained by Porsche and inspected to ensure it is ready for the new owner to enjoy without any immediate needs.
Neutral: Several inquiries demonstrate the potential buyers' practical considerations about the vehicle. @Hemi70 asks about the availability of ventilated seats, to which the seller explains that the Alcantara seating does not warrant active ventilation due to its breathable nature. @Bklyndave74 requests information on the brakes, leaks from the sunroof, and tire date codes, to which @RundeepResources provides detailed answers, including comments on the car's excellent condition and maintenance. These interactions reveal the buyers' desire for specific details and the seller’s responsiveness, creating a forum for discussion that benefits the community.
Negative: While the comments generally reflect a positive overall impression, there are subtle concerns raised by potential buyers. @LawDog and @KingTut01 inquire about tire measurements, brake condition, and maintenance history, which indicates a cautious approach from some bidders regarding the vehicle's condition. @Frosty also questions the state of the dashboard leather, reflecting a desire to ensure everything is in top shape. Although the seller reassures the community about the car's outstanding condition and lack of issues, some buyers aim to seek additional confirmation before making a bid.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its stunning appearance and exceptional condition. @Youngtimerclassics (The Seller) emphasizes that the BlackBerry Pearl LS is a well-preserved collector's item, showcasing its excellent interior and exterior condition alongside extensive dealer servicing. @Dollycat3 praises the beauty of the LS400, and @mustang850 reflects on a nostalgic experience with a similar model, noting how this one is in much better shape. The consensus is that this LS400 stands out in the market, especially with its rare Blackberry paint.
Neutral: Several commenters express interest in the vehicle's features and its history, with @AliG1 requesting a closer look at the suspension. @Youngtimerclassics (The Seller) responds to these inquiries, indicating ongoing communication with the owner to provide potential buyers with more details. The discussion reflects enthusiasm mixed with practical questions about the car's specifications and maintenance, as well as its collectible status.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle; however, @jpeters1 humorously suggests that they might skimp on essentials to afford the car, indicating a passionate desire but also a hint at the financial strain such a luxurious purchase could entail. Overall, the tone remains markedly positive, with no adverse remarks about the car's condition or value.
|
 |
Positive: @CanAmDan remarked on the vehicle's aesthetics, calling it a beautiful car. @executan expressed admiration for the build quality, stating that it is a nice build. Additionally, @JinTX described the car as beautiful, showing enthusiasm for its appearance. Moreover, @crashdwj, the seller, confirmed the power output of the car, noting that it should be around 350 rwhp according to KB's manual, which received appreciation from prospective buyers. @BenjaminDale, the seller's nephew, also shared positive experiences driving the car, reinforcing its appeal and absence of smoke odors.
Neutral: Comments expressed curiosity about various technical aspects of the vehicle. For instance, @executan inquired about the RPMs at highway speeds and the aftermarket differential's gear ratio. @JinTX sought clarification regarding leaks, the sunroof, and fuel requirements for the car. @KenAshton requested a video of the vehicle's underside for rust inspection. In response, @crashdwj provided information on the existing differential configuration and confirmed that he would provide the requested videos and photos, ensuring that potential buyers were fully informed.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about potential damage and required clarifications. @executan initially thought there might have been damage to the left rear quarter of the car, based on photos, but @crashdwj confirmed there were no accidents reported on the carfax. @KenAshton also requested further images to verify the condition of the tail light area, indicating a need for more visual reassurance regarding the vehicle's state. These inquiries reflect a cautious approach from buyers who want to ensure the vehicle's integrity before making a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @cofibration started the conversation with enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its appeal with comments like "Sweet!" and noting the fun and desirability of the model, indicating that prices are rising for units like this one. @Caymanorcarrera mentioned the reliability and capabilities of the 987 model, suggesting that it offers great driving experience despite some limitations. @PSTT celebrated the unique GT Silver color, stating it’s a cooler option than the more common Arctic Silver, further supported by @RJ80's appreciation for the original fog lamps, showcasing the distinctive aesthetic features of the car.
Neutral: Several commenters sought clarification regarding the vehicle’s specifications and details, with @Lconkisstador pointing out the need for the title to be corrected to reflect it being a 5-speed vehicle instead of 6-speed, while also questioning the claim of a limited slip differential. @Cyncarver and @DNJONES expressed interest in receiving confirmation on the DME and LSD specifics. The seller, @Collectibleclassics, actively engaged with the audience, promising to address these inquiries and make necessary updates, thereby reflecting a transparent interaction.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle’s potential issues, with @62VAGON questioning the cold start performance and mentioning blue smoke, followed by @CTDan and @hueyhoolihan discussing their experiences and reassuring that minimal blue smoke isn't usually alarming. However, they cautioned that excessive smoke could signal a deeper problem. Additionally, @cofibration recommended removing the limited slip differential claim from the listing unless it had been an aftermarket addition, suggesting a possible inaccuracy that the seller needed to address.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed admiration for the vehicle's condition, noting that the 2003 Lexus LX 470 appears to be very well taken care of. @DukeDog1 mentioned its beauty both inside and out, while @Thompson-Restorations praised the care given to the vehicle. The seller, @ppmoran, reinforced this by stating it smells factory fresh, confirming it was never smoked in.
Neutral: Several users are seeking clarification on the vehicle's maintenance history. @Kssummerrow asked about the limited service records, to which @ppmoran explained that it had been thoroughly inspected and serviced by a Lexus dealer. @kahunafamily5 inquired about the timing belt and transmission servicing, which prompted discussions regarding the timing belt's replacement schedule and the fact that its status was uncertain as the previous owner had traded it in.
Negative: Concerns were raised about maintenance needs, particularly regarding the timing belt and absence of floor mats. @drput highlighted the importance of timely belt replacement due to the potential for severe engine damage if neglected. Additionally, @Tate05 pointed out the lack of floor mats, and @SonsofMayberry asked about the battery's age, reflecting general apprehension about the vehicle's maintenance status.
|
 |
Positive: @jayseitz commented positively on the paint of the vehicle, noting it looks really good for a 30-year-old truck. @jetsetautomotive (The Seller) confirmed that the paint appears to be original, with measurements indicating minimal thickness across the panels, which supports @jayseitz's observation. The seller also highlighted that the truck looks stunning outside in the sun, suggesting its visual appeal has been maintained.
Neutral: @JLack9090 inquired whether both fuel tanks are functional, indicating a potential aspect of interest for buyers but not necessarily a negative or positive comment. @tritfright4 sought additional undercarriage photos to assess the condition before a previous black paint-over, reflecting a desire for more information on the truck's state. @mainlinewillys asked if the polished aluminum wheels were included, suggesting that potential buyers are looking for specifics on the truck's complete offerings.
Negative: @tritfright4 expressed concerns regarding the clarity of previously shared undercarriage photos, stating they were inadequate to determine the extent of rust. Despite @jetsetautomotive (The Seller) assuring that the rust is surface level and not severe, @tritfright4's comments reflect skepticism about the undercarriage's condition, which could detract from potential buyers' interest. Overall, while the seller attempts to address concerns, there remains an air of doubt regarding the vehicle's underlying condition based on @tritfright4's feedback.
|
 |
Positive: @bunkscars, the seller, provided a detailed account of the truck's history, indicating it was a running vehicle that spent most of its life in Kansas. The seller noted that the truck has a 1959 Chev 235 cu in engine, and highlighted that it operates well despite several modern issues like a non-functioning speedometer and lights. The bed lift mechanism and power take-off cable were mentioned to be functional, and the owner has used the truck for hauling purposes in the past, showing that it is capable of work despite its age.
Neutral: Commenters like @George51 and @1948Chevy pointed out some areas of concern, such as the readability of the ID plate and the discrepancies in the serial number decoding. Others, including @Retro1, shared their personal experiences with similar models, expressing that while older trucks can be fun to drive, their braking systems may not be optimal. @bunkscars clarified that the truck's brakes and various components are present, but some functions may need repairs to ensure safe highway use.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the truck's truck condition, particularly from @George51, who inquired about the inoperable rear brakes and asked if there were leaks in the hydraulic system. Additionally, the issues surrounding the gauges and lights not functioning were noted. @Tmm343 expressed difficulty finding parts for the truck's braking system, echoing a common concern for prospective buyers about maintenance and sourcing replacement parts for older vehicles.
|
 |
Positive: @RickT206 expressed that the vehicle brings back nostalgic memories, calling it a great looking Honda and wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Mike8103 also commented positively about its appearance and shared similar nostalgic feelings. @ColsTiger reminisced about learning to ride on a similar motorcycle and noted that the one listed seems to be in excellent condition, further adding to the positive sentiment surrounding the vehicle.
Neutral: @2wheels4life brought up a point about the owner’s manual and its visibility in the listing photos but did so lightheartedly. @southwestsuperbikes (The Seller) clarified the confusion regarding the headlight bucket color for @Megan1996, explaining that the description error was acknowledged and providing an assurance of their customer service. @Vintagehondanut provided additional context to the headlight color question, mentioning variations in the original models and offering insight into potential differences.
Negative: @RRoller123 inquired about whether a compression test had been performed and expressed that they would like to see those numbers before bidding, highlighting a concern that potential buyers have. @TedLitvin suggested that without a start-up and riding video, the listing might lose potential bidders, which indicates a level of disappointment in how the vehicle is presented. Overall, both comments reflect a need for more information before committing to a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Badcabbage described the M3 convertible as beautiful and requested a startup video, indicating a strong interest in its operation. @ClarinetMan shared a nostalgic experience, expressing admiration for the car's design and construction, highlighting its classic quality. @GeorgeEmily echoed similar sentiments, reflecting on the high-quality interior of a previous BMW, stating it had an intangible appeal that made it memorable and enjoyable to drive.
Neutral: @1600veloce, the seller, provided detailed information about the vehicle and highlighted the available services, including a walkthrough and storage solutions. The seller emphasized the quality and condition of their listings, aiming to create a transparent and user-friendly experience for potential buyers. Multiple inquiries were made about vehicle specifics, including a request for clarification on a trim piece, showcasing the interest in thorough inspection before bidding.
Negative: @mazman72 expressed disappointment about not receiving a reply to their request for a viewing, suggesting potential communication issues. The mention of noticeable wear on the seat bolster from @Mx7 raised concerns about the vehicle's condition relative to its mileage. Additionally, @mazman72 inquired about the Carfax, indicating a desire for further transparency regarding the car's history, which may reflect some buyer apprehension.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its condition and low mileage, with @CorintheanLeather1971 (The Seller) describing it as a "unicorn" due to its impressive configuration and maintenance history. The truck has been well-kept, showing minimal wear on the interior and exterior, and boasts a clean underside with no signs of rust. Additionally, the seller mentions that all maintenance is up to date, including new spark plugs and batteries, ensuring it drives beautifully.
Neutral: Several comments reflect curiosity about specific features, such as the height of the truck in lifted stance and potential body roll during driving. @G38 and @etheisen94 ask detailed questions about the vehicle's condition, including requests for photos of the frame and rocker panels. @Anthonyma weighs in with his appreciation for the lifted aspect of the truck, but notes it may deter some potential buyers.
Negative: While the truck has many positive attributes, some commenters express concerns about its past ownership, as it has had seven owners, which might raise questions for potential buyers. @adamism123 queries the need for tuning and bulletproofing a vehicle with a 7.3 engine, suggesting some uncertainty about whether modifications were necessary. Overall, while the seller insists the vehicle has been well-maintained and reliable, the number of previous owners may give some buyers pause.
|
 |
Positive: @Nomistay11 praised the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition and the quality of the reinforced subframe with welded gussets. They also mentioned the effectiveness of Seat Doctors for anyone considering redoing their car's leather seats, sharing their positive personal experience with a similar model. @69_911e echoed this sentiment, describing the car as a nice example, noting the significance of it being the last year of the 4.5L engine before the 380SL era.
Neutral: @Vic (The Seller) welcomed potential buyers to the auction, presenting the car as a beautiful example with a stunning color combination. They emphasized that the vehicle runs and drives perfectly and that the paint shines and looks great. Additionally, the seller provided a cold start video but offered no specifics on the timing chain's service history, which led to a query from @cristy about its replacement.
Negative: @cristy raised a concern about the timing chain replacement, indicating interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @Vic (The Seller) acknowledged this uncertainty, stating that they do not have records regarding the timing chain replacement and mentioned that the 450SL generally has fewer timing chain issues compared to the 380SL. However, this lack of clarity on service history might deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @NVGT350 expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle's appearance, describing it as a 'real stunner,' and praises the seller for the handle and license plate, showcasing a light-hearted approach to car ownership. Other users like @Henagej and @Klapan67 compliment the car's aesthetics, noting its 'nice lines' and 'good gaps,' suggesting a well-crafted and visually appealing vehicle. There's an admiration for the overall aesthetic, with users engaging positively about specific features such as the rear spoiler and paint condition.
Neutral: @BubbaGPZ1100 comments on the lien associated with the vehicle, providing clarity that it does not hinder the bidding process on BAT, as long as the seller has set the reserve correctly. @daagun asks for more information regarding the lien and the seller's availability for payment assistance, indicating an interest in understanding the logistical aspects of the purchase. @firepro inquires about the lien amount and buyer responsibilities, showing that potential buyers are seeking detailed information regarding the financial aspects of the sale.
Negative: @BigWings raises concerns about the paint imperfections on the car, prompting @sidechickmustang (The Seller) to acknowledge these issues and commit to providing more photos, indicating transparency in addressing vehicle condition concerns. @cschaefer16 questions the lien situation further, while @Twells10 asks about the lender to emphasize uncertainty around the loan details. Responses from @sidechickmustang (The Seller) suggest that the lien amount is a significant consideration for bidders, which could create hesitancy among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have noted the vehicle's beauty, with @Zzurowski calling it a "beautiful vehicle." @Herrmann appreciated the seller's prompt feedback and helpful offer regarding maintenance issues, indicating signs of a good seller. Additionally, the seller, @bg191, has positively addressed concerns about the vehicle's features and maintenance, including the replacement of the front lower rubber piece under the spoiler with a new OEM lip, showcasing his attention to detail.
Neutral: The seller, @bg191, responded to inquiries about the coolant lines, confirming they were pinned and promising to check the service records for information related to the spark plugs, coils, and fluids. He also mentioned addressing the circular discoloration on the center console before the sale or compensating the buyer, which demonstrates a willingness to maintain transparency and provide proper service. Shipping assistance was also offered, reflecting a cooperative approach to the sale process.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly by @Nein-Elf, who pointed out issues with the documentation of oil changes, highlighting a pattern of poor maintenance practices. @Twells10 inquired about deferred maintenance items from 2023, questioning whether those issues had been resolved. Additionally, @Herrmann questioned a peculiar mark on the vehicle, indicating that while there are some signs of the seller's attentiveness, concerns about maintenance and documentation persist.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the 2004 Harley-Davidson Road King, with @sbb1987 noting its beautiful color and considering it a great low-mileage machine that someone is sure to enjoy. @ppointer praised the decision to keep the original tires, highlighting that it respects the potential preferences of collectors. Additionally, @Reaganspaw fondly reminisced about his own experiences with a similar model, describing it as the best riding cruiser he had and expressing confidence that the winning bidder would not be disappointed with this bike.
Neutral: The comments included inquiries about specific details of the bike, such as @Lubedude1 asking if it needed new tires and if it had stock exhaust baffles. @jbondbmw (The Seller) provided information about the bike's original 2004 tires and confirmed that the exhaust was stock, while also noting that the removable speakers were likely Harley dealer parts. @Leonia shared her personal experience of owning multiple Harleys and how the seller's father's attachment to motorcycles resonated with her.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about the bike's very low mileage, with @JustKip questioning why it hadn't been ridden more. While @Oldarmyguy's comment about wanting a matching leather jacket highlighted nostalgia, it also indicated a possible disappointment for collectors hoping to acquire all original accessories. Additionally, @jbondbmw (The Seller) had to clarify that a matching jacket was not included with the bike, which may leave some buyers feeling it lacks certain collectible elements.
|
 |
Positive: @dailydriversautosales mentioned that the vehicle does not have a coolant issue, showing confidence in the vehicle's current state and maintenance. This suggests that the seller feels positively about the vehicle's functionality and has addressed any concerns that have been raised.
Neutral: @WAGONBOYTD acknowledged that the vehicle saved the fuel tank shield but pointed out a concern regarding the dash, indicating that while there are some redeeming qualities, there are still aspects that could use improvement. The mention of the coolant again from @WAGONBOYTD shows a growing concern for the vehicle's maintenance and indicates mixed feelings about its overall condition.
Negative: @WAGONBOYTD expressed apprehension that the vehicle could develop a coolant issue due to excess fluid in the overflow tank, suggesting a problem that the seller may need to address. This comment highlights a significant concern about the vehicle's maintenance that could affect its performance if not attended to promptly.
|
 |
Positive: @Mc25t190 (The Seller) presents the truck as a "very fine example of an 03 Tundra 4x4" and assures potential buyers that it requires no additional investment unless they wish to customize it. He emphasizes the truck's excellent condition, stating that all functionalities work properly and no mechanical issues are present. Furthermore, he mentions that the truck spent most of its life in the south, resulting in no rust problems, and that he has taken more than a hundred photos to showcase its condition. Buyers can trust that he has invested in necessary repairs, including changing the timing belt and water pump, ensuring the truck is "turnkey ready" with no hidden expenses.
Neutral: Many comments focus on clarifying details that potential buyers are curious about. @asumtneer asks about the history behind the truck and expresses admiration for its quality, while @Joeys_Dream seeks clarification on the ownership and mileage details listed. @August3760 brings up concerns regarding the frame condition and recalls for safety evaluations, demonstrating a cautious approach. @FLACPA appreciates the thorough photo documentation but requests confirmation about the functioning of the transfer case, indicating that prospective buyers are paying attention to technical details and ensuring they're making a sound investment. @Jocko315 and @2nabote inquire about the possibility of viewing the truck in person, showing interest in a hands-on evaluation.
Negative: Several comments express concerns over the truck’s history and maintenance records. @Marleyboy13 raises a question about the front bumper being repainted and the airbag replacement, hinting at potential past damage. @Johnl34 is skeptical about the lack of documented oil changes during the mileage history, while @Dr_collins points out possible dents in the rear bumper mentioned in earlier comments. These questions suggest a level of mistrust around the truck's past and its maintenance transparency, leading some potential buyers to hesitate. Moreover, @mattsmit0179 points out discrepancies in the suspension height, suggesting either modifications or potential misrepresentation, which may raise red flags for prospective bidders.
|
 |
Positive: @Spotpea expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, noting their desire to start looking for a coupe, which suggests that the car is appealing and has attracted interest. This positive sentiment indicates that the vehicle is viewed favorably by potential buyers.
Neutral: @iTod raised a question about why the original factory 22" wheels were replaced with 21" wheels and whether the 21" wheels are included in the sale. This indicates curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and changes but does not imply any strong positive or negative sentiment. Similarly, @Juvanni inquired about whether the vehicle has PPF or a ceramic coat, indicating interest in the vehicle's condition without expressing a definitive opinion on it.
Negative: @GBO5020 (The Seller) responded to questions about the wheels and protective coatings, stating that they did not know why the wheels were changed and that no protective coatings were applied. This transparency, while informative, could raise concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and how it might affect its resale value or longevity. Additionally, @BOOOM's comment about new bidders could imply skepticism about bidding behavior, suggesting a lack of confidence in the auction process.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong enthusiasm for the Porsche 944 Turbo being auctioned off, as its clean and solid condition is highlighted. The seller, @Harbormotorcars, describes the car in detail, showcasing its strong service history with documented maintenance such as a recent timing belt service and oil changes. Commenter @Willyp89 expresses excitement, calling the car a 'time capsule' and other users, including @Britgent, affirm their fond memories of owning a 944, indicating the car's nostalgic appeal. There is also a lot of engagement from potential buyers keen to obtain further details, contributing to a positive atmosphere surrounding the auction.
Neutral: Several comments focus on seeking additional information or clarifications about the car's specifics. Many users, such as @aitalam and @GNavakas, inquire about service histories, undercarriage photos, and mechanical details that are not immediately available. The seller is responsive, providing updates on service records and offering to connect potential buyers with specialists for additional services. Comments from @EricAtlanta ask for various close-up shots and details about the car's condition, especially addressing concerns about the dashboard and trim, highlighting the community's interest in ensuring transparency in the auction process.
Negative: Some comments reflect concerns about the car's condition and missing features. Instances of skepticism arise, particularly from commenters like @Dons968 who question the absence of sport seats, and @EricAtlanta, who points out possible trim issues and previous service repairs. @Farrahsdad raises questions regarding a potential dent in the wheel well and requests clarification about paint work. Overall, while the comments don't delve deeply into major negatives, there is an undercurrent of cautious inquiry surrounding the vehicle, suggesting that potential buyers are being thorough in their due diligence.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the overall aesthetics and condition of the vehicle. @BobSoCal remarked on its beauty, while @juacan described it as very nice and well-maintained, deeming it the ideal 911 air-cooled model with a manual transmission. The car's bright GPW exterior and Classic Grey interior were highlighted positively by @hector13 and @Huxleyhorn, reflecting the car's appeal for purists and enthusiasts alike. Additionally, @carsick52 and @Huxleyhorn shared insights into the meticulous care the car received from its original owner, contributing to the strong confidence in the car's maintenance history.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specific details about the car, such as the necessity for wheel changes and the interior specifications. @ThrasherBear asked about the distinction in interior color and the original wheels, indicating an interest in understanding its exact configuration. Comments from @Peedubdee and others also touched upon the reasons why the car was driven so little, as well as the need for images highlighting any damage or repairs, showing a balanced perspective on its condition and history.
Negative: On the flip side, there were some concerns regarding the vehicle. @Peedubdee brought up the very limited mileage and questioned whether it was due to issues with the vehicle. Additionally, there were questions regarding the quality of the repair done to the rear quarter panel, which @WatsonFcauto1 (The Seller) confirmed was nearly flawless but raised a few eyebrows regarding transparency. Comments like those of @ThrasherBear indicate that potential buyers are looking for thorough assurance that the vehicle's condition is as excellent as advertised.
|
 |
Positive: @axelrider notes that there have been a lot of nice Discos lately, specifically highlighting that it's the best year with features like the rear center differential that is missing from other D2s. They express their curiosity about the auction, indicating it will be interesting to watch, and wish good luck to all participants. @GBRBiLL echoes this sentiment, pointing out the variety of D2s available on the platform, suggesting that there's something for everyone.
Neutral: @ghostrunneron raises concerns about the fit of the Vijay bumpers, asking if it's normal for them to appear crooked or oddly angled, noting their experience with Terrafirma bumpers fitting well. They also inquire whether the secondary air pump runs on engine cold starts, and mention a detail about the gas cap door that appears open in the photos, leading to questions about its functionality.
Negative: @79skyjock agrees with @ghostrunneron that the front bumper could use better fitting, reinforcing the concern about the bumper installation quality. Overall, there seems to be some skepticism regarding the fitment of aftermarket parts, which could detract from the overall perception of the vehicle's quality.
|
 |
Positive: @TomInTampa mentioned that based on the high bid from the previous auction, the current asking price for the vehicle seems quite fair. @Pistol_Pete described the car as a beautiful high-end restoration throughout, highlighting the quality of the work done. Others, like @ima68tr, noted the inclusions like leather seats and rare AMCO bumper bars, praising the condition of both the body and the engine bay. @Dr.T expressed appreciation for the community's insights, indicating a positive view of the vehicle's specifications and performance despite some concerns raised by others.
Neutral: @jhlytle (The Seller) provided a detailed background, explaining the reason for selling the car and his experience with it. He disclosed that the car has been well-maintained, having spent its life in southwestern states, and has a comprehensive binder of restoration receipts worth approximately $65-70k. @CarrieMcQ's comment about curious inquiries regarding the seller's warehouse prompted an interesting dialogue among buyers about other potential items for sale. Additionally, there were multiple comments addressing technical aspects, like the absence of overdrive and air cleaner placement, indicating a shared curiosity about the vehicle's mechanical details without negative implications.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @Rich_Truett, who pointed out that the air cleaner housing appeared to be installed incorrectly, potentially affecting performance. @Dr.T echoed these concerns by suggesting modifications might be necessary to improve airflow, even though the seller and some commenters noted the car still runs strong. @TheWaz71 questioned the quick turnaround on the sale, hinting at skepticism about the seller's motivations. Overall, while the car is positively viewed, some minor concerns regarding its mechanical details and the seller's selling timeline raised caution among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @GregAdamsIL describes the vehicle as a nice looking Rover, acknowledging that many usual issues have been addressed and that it boasts relatively low mileage. @Epugh (The Seller) agrees, stating that the vehicle is a fine example and has been well maintained, with videos of cold start and driving expected soon. @roverthat praises the vehicle as an absolute gem and highlights the exceptionally clean headliner, well-kept engine bay, and strong condition of the leather seats, implying that such well-maintained interiors are rare.
Neutral: @Epugh (The Seller) responds to inquiries by confirming that in-person viewings are welcome and explains the reason for the sale, mentioning that the vehicle has only been driven approximately 1,000 miles since its purchase and has been stored in a climate-controlled garage. @hpxxhan queries about the original smog equipment and AC functionality, to which @Epugh verifies that both are intact and in working order, offering reassurance about the vehicle's condition. @Cardinallands1 also seeks information about rust repairs, and @Epugh clarifies that there is no rust, asserting that the floorboard is solid.
Negative: @burt33 questions the seller about the quick turnover of the vehicle, indicating potential concern over why a purchase would be followed by a sale so soon. Additionally, @gelliott32 inquires about an oil leak, which @Epugh attributes to a minor issue with the rear main seal, although he confirms that this is the only leak noted by a mechanic. Despite these concerns, @Epugh assures all issues have been disclosed and addressed with documentation, conveying a transparent approach to potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @bobofohio expressed a strong appreciation for the GranTurismo, describing it as the nicest car he has ever driven, second only to perhaps a Ferrari 458 Italia. He highlighted its excellent seating and performance, calling it the "Belle of the Ball" among his collection of cars. @cmlf1 also shared their enthusiasm for high-mileage Maseratis, noting that the Carfax associated with the vehicle reveals 44 service records, which speaks positively to its maintenance history.
Neutral: @choicedealsnc2017, the seller, provided clarifications on previous comments. In response to @bookduster01's inquiry about an earlier sale that fell through, the seller explained that the situation was due to the previous buyer's inability to meet import tax requirements, emphasizing that it had nothing to do with the quality of the car itself. Additionally, the seller has indicated that they will share messages from the previous bidder to provide further transparency.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns raised regarding the vehicle's reliability and sales history. @djw90 questioned whether the cited import tax was indeed the sole reason for the previous buyer's withdrawal, suggesting that a more informed buyer should have been aware of such fees. Additionally, @peter34748 raised skepticism about conflicting statements regarding the car's selling price, while @park4759 inquired about the timing of the last oil change, indicating a concern for the vehicle's maintenance consistency. @Copycatyouweasel sought clarification on the number of tire sets the car has gone through, further highlighting potential worries over its long-term condition.
|
 |
Positive: @curtraffi appreciates the car's stock appearance and mentioned its resto-mod nature by asking about the Coyote and transmission conversion work. @ButWhatDoIKnow acknowledges the significant improvements while retaining the original status of the vehicle. @PaverJohn expresses interest in viewing the car in person and conveys intrigue even though he owns a very original 1956 model. @boaboyoz admires the car's build and describes it as a "rambunctious red Thunderbird." @kdlp notes the appealing modern drivetrain and careful details like the wire wheels fitting under the skirts, expressing a desire for a similar rest-o-mod. @Laurence5905 agrees that the upgrades are smartly placed and praises the overall quality of the build, stating it's a perfect resto-mod.
Neutral: @Remosauto1 (The Seller) responds to PaverJohn's inquiry about seeing the vehicle in person and confirms arrangements can be made. @Classicman84 seeks clarification on the absence of a soft top. @60Bird inquires about the source of the center console cupholder and its construction. @ChrisColt provides a detailed analysis of the added console features, including questions about the horn, wiper motor, and air conditioning installation. @Remosauto1 (The Seller) addresses ChrisColt's questions, explaining the function of the rocker switch, the horn's disconnection, and confirming the wipers were upgraded to an electric motor. @fgallo seeks to understand how the horn operates.
Negative: @Y2K911 suggests that the seller should include top-off pictures to enhance the appeal of the convertible. He also criticizes the absence of a soft top for practical use in different weather conditions. @ChrisColt voices a personal preference for a manual transmission option and implies that there could be improvements that would enhance the vehicle's experience, particularly for driving in humid conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @dogasaur expressed excitement as a new owner of a 2015.5 V60 P*Star, highlighting satisfaction with their purchase. @Knopmannghia, a fellow owner, praised the vehicle as a fantastic, underappreciated sleeper that performs exceptionally well, capable of impressing those who drive it. The seller, @goofyfoot, shared a positive experience transitioning from a 2004 CTSV, mentioning that the performance balance of the Polestar won them over. Moreover, they noted all new rotors and pads installed recently and offered winter tires as an additional incentive.
Neutral: @bt2233 inquired about the car's minor damage report, seeking clarification on the specific repairs. @vivalasgedas raised questions about surface rust and maintenance history, including previous service for fluids and components such as spark plugs and dampers. The seller provided detailed maintenance responses, indicating that the spark plugs were changed at 60,000 miles and that the suspension was also inspected, though they could not confirm full records due to being out of town.
Negative: @Vivalasgedas also pointed out concerns regarding surface rust, questioning if it was unusual for a California car. Additionally, there were inquiries about previous accidents and tire replacements that raised caution about potential recurring maintenance issues. Furthermore, @Tacwags asked about the permanent roof rack installation and its implications, indicating a potential drawback if alterations are desired.
|
 |
Positive: @dsafian praised the vehicle as an amazingly capable platform, calling it the first luxury SUV that is super comfortable and an off-road mountain goat. They expressed a desire to own one again, highlighting its impressive performance and appealing look. @Dollycat3 complimented the vehicle's beautiful Gray Mist Metallic color, while @TexasMajor described it as an awesome Wagoneer, inquiring about its care and further details like a close-up of the underside of the floor pans.
Neutral: @GregoryZ (The Seller) provided several updates about the vehicle throughout the comments. They clarified issues raised, such as the alternator and assured viewers that it was functioning well after inspection and that maintenance was being performed on the vehicle. @GregoryZ also addressed inquiries regarding the condition of the headliner and seat upholstery, stating that it was in good condition and made from quality materials, although documentation on the upholstery was not available as it was done by a family member.
Negative: @Royce59 pointed out a potential issue during a video presentation, claiming the alternator was not charging, prompting a discussion about its actual status. @Smokumm4 questioned the authenticity of the vehicle's wheels, suggesting they were incorrect for this model year and expressing concern about the final edition's specifications. This comment initiated a response from @HALDOC who provided clarification about the wheel options available on the Wagoneer model.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH expressed enthusiasm for the three-pedal 80 series, calling it a sign that life is good. @wngrog commented on the aesthetic appeal of the vehicle, describing it as a good looking 80. @TheOldGarage1Cali noted that the deal seems very favorable, suggesting optimism about the auction's outcome.
Neutral: @CousinDave360 commented on the lack of manual transmission options for the 80 series in the US and shared a plan to swap the automatic transmission with a manual one. @Hurstolds1442 inquired about the vehicle's four-wheel-drive mechanism and potential for front and rear lockers, showing interest without making a judgment. @Classichouse (The Seller) provided detailed replies about the vehicle's specifications, such as its full-time four-wheel-drive system and fuel tank capacities, indicating his willingness to engage with potential buyers.
Negative: @CousinDave360 noted that there were no manual transmissions sold in the US, which could be seen as a limitation for enthusiasts. @walkercagle asked about a broken corner highlighted in a photo, indicating some concern about the vehicle's condition. Comments about the uploaded video being mistakenly associated with another vehicle suggest some confusion or concern over mistargeted documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @ronfrohock expressed that the car looks really nice and noted that while it will need some service, it appears to be a legitimate vehicle. @Starkmad identified it as a very nice example and provided constructive advice regarding the actuator clip and the muffler type, confirming the car’s potential value. @Carguy4fun (The Seller) assured that the car has passed California smog certification, and he described the car's condition positively, highlighting the lack of scratches or oil leaks, reinforcing that it should appreciate in value.
Neutral: @Lugnuts mentioned the unusual situation regarding the car’s accident history as noted on Carfax, suggesting it could be a reporting issue. @Gonnawin1 commented on the need for proofreading in the listing, while @willy questioned the dealer's process of getting the vehicle passed for CA buyers. Several users indicated a curiosity about specific details such as pictures of the rear decklid and service history, demonstrating engagement without strong opinions.
Negative: @robgcpa raised concerns about the vehicle's past accident and the reliability of its history report. @Scott_S pointed out discrepancies in the vehicle's color between pictures, raising potential red flags about the car's condition. Additionally, @charron98 humorously criticized the type of tires on the Ferrari, indicating dissatisfaction with the choice of Fullway tires.
|
 |
Positive: @FordNutt reminisces about his father's 68 Torino GT, expressing admiration for the beautiful restoration quality and the car's stunning Lime Gold color. @CollinNutt95, the seller, confirms the color and appreciates the compliments, emphasizing that the car has been built to an exceptionally high standard, with significant power and modern stopping capabilities. @DrScootay also praises the restoration, reflecting on their desire to find a similar car in the past, and wishing the seller good luck with the sale.
Neutral: Comments from @Wandering_Lens focus on the vehicle's size and comfort for taller individuals, with inquiries about headroom and concerns about condition issues like a hairline crack in the top frame. @CollinNutt95 addresses these concerns openly, providing reassurances about the car's structural integrity while noting a minor repair made on the front fender. The seller also shares details of the extensive investment and time involved in the restoration, including the decision to replace rear quarters for the best possible outcome.
Negative: @Wandering_Lens asks for clearer images of the vehicle's Marti Report, which led to confusion as @midwestfordman pointed out that the uploaded report was incorrect. @fireclown makes a comment about the car's flawless condition, implying that it might not be satisfactory to someone who is very picky. Despite these minor issues, the overall response reflects a strong appreciation for the car's quality and careful restoration.
|
 |
Positive: @gdba (The Seller) shared that the vehicle, affectionately named Scarlett, has been garage kept her entire life, remaining completely unmodified with original tires, which many potential bidders appreciate. @trper91 described the vehicle as a beauty, and @Antoniofal highlighted the well-presented listing and expressed admiration for the color. The seller's openness about the car’s condition and features, along with the inclusion of original materials and memorabilia, adds to the overall positive impression of Scarlett, making it an appealing option for collectors or enthusiasts.
Neutral: @gdba (The Seller) answered inquiries regarding modifications, confirming that the car is entirely stock aside from factory all-season floor mats. The seller mentioned the historical significance of the vehicle’s color, noting that while Championship White is popular, he prefers the understated gray that complements the red accents. The seller's willingness to provide additional information and materials underscores the vehicle's authenticity to interested bidders.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the auction discussion. All feedback has been either positive or neutral, focusing on the car's well-maintained condition and the seller's transparency.
|
 |
Positive: @philcatan (The Seller) promotes the 1982 Buick Riviera Convertible as an exceptional vehicle with only 15,000 original miles, emphasizing it has been well-maintained by a single owner and always garage-kept. Comments from users like @rollsroyce appreciate the car's beauty, indicating a positive perception of its appearance. @philcatan assures potential buyers of the car's spectacular condition, highlighting that all options work flawlessly and there are no leaks, further reinforcing its value to interested parties.
Neutral: There are inquiries from potential buyers about specific details of the vehicle. @lmlister asks about the transmission type, to which @philcatan responds with accuracy, enhancing buyer knowledge. @24CWR24 expresses interest in the condition of components such as bumper fillers, operational aspects, and requests pictures showing the interior without a headliner, demonstrating a curiosity about the vehicle's specifics.
Negative: @24CWR24's comments reflect slight concerns regarding the vehicle's details, such as whether the bumper fillers are original and the absence of a headliner, indicating some uncertainty that could potentially affect buyers' perceptions. Despite such worries, @philcatan addresses these queries positively to alleviate any doubts, although the questions suggest that buyers are discerning and cautious about the purchase.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its potential for an enjoyable driving experience. @Davidkillion remarked on the fun of driving the car, while @Ben_E noted that removing the bumpers enhances the car's aesthetics, making it visually appealing. Additionally, @Brengler shared a positive experience racing against the car at Laguna Seca, praising its preparation and attention to detail, which instills confidence in its performance. The seller, @67numberfive, provided comprehensive information about the car's specifications, which was well-received by the audience.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for technical details and clarified specifics about the vehicle's components, signifying a thirst for information among potential buyers. For instance, @CarletonScott inquired about dyno results, to which @67numberfive responded, and @AlfaHolic also asked for log books that document the car's history. These queries indicate a more analytical approach from enthusiasts looking deeply into the vehicle's performance metrics and racing pedigree, which suggests a serious interest alongside casual curiosity about the car's capabilities.
Negative: On the negative side, there were some concerns about the sourcing of parts for the vehicle, such as @rustycarrs questioning the origin of the limited-slip differential and being unable to find information on 'The Engine Room'. @trracer further emphasized this point by asking for specifics about the engine build and the differences in value based on the components used. This reveals some skepticism about the car's modifications and the need for clarity regarding its assembly to confirm its true racing credentials.
|
2005 Chevrolet Kodiak C4500 Duramax Car Hauler w/ 2002 Imperial 4-Car Trailer
1GBE4E1245F529726
Lot 240318
Dealer
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed general interest and excitement about the vehicle, highlighting its utility and specialized features. User @dcv2683 referred to it as a 'really cool rig' and wished luck to the seller. @BlueChipCar (The Seller) was responsive to inquiries, indicating a willingness to provide additional information such as driving videos and clarifying the vehicle's use as a private vehicle, which adds reassurance to potential buyers. Many users seem to appreciate the seller's active engagement in answering questions and offering assistance.
Neutral: Some commenters brought up practical questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and requirements, including inquiring about the Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) requirements for operating the rig. @Gusman344 and @SJWarrior1979 asked about the truck's Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) and whether a CDL would be necessary, which @BlueChipCar (The Seller) addressed in detail, clarifying that the truck itself may not require a CDL but the trailer could depending on total weight. Others, like @bigsky47, sought information on maintenance records and interior features, reflecting a general curiosity about the vehicle's condition and functionality.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commenters about the logistics of vehicle registration and business viability. @Dynamic1 highlighted an issue with the title's VIN discrepancy, questioning the validity of associated documents. Additionally, @bigsky47 pointed out the absence of maintenance records after 2024, raising potential concerns about the vehicle's upkeep. Despite some enthusiasm, there were clear indications of skepticism about the vehicle's operational logistics and the seller's transparency on key details.
|
 |
Positive: @forrestkhaag shared that their experience with a similar 71 model was quite enjoyable, emphasizing that it's a fun vehicle that is easy to maintain. Simple fixes can be done affordably, like addressing a bouncing speedometer needle and tightening the side shift linkage. @BartKeleher (The Seller) appreciates the feedback and expresses enthusiasm about the car, mentioning its great driving qualities and fun aesthetics. @Caymanorcarrera noted the appealing modifications, such as the Pedrinis and the period front spoiler, indicating a strong interest in features that enhance the car's classic appeal. Overall, commentors expressed positive sentiments about the vehicle's aesthetics and ease of maintenance.
Neutral: There were discussions around the car's specifications, including confirmations about the paint code and the type of wheels used. @Buyingformywife corrected the paint code to Irish Green rather than Irish Racing Green, while @BobbySmith and @gint clarified the wheels’ make as Mahle. While there were mentions of how some features like the heat exchangers being present could ease future modifications, various users sought clarification on the car's mechanical aspects, such as the nature of the transmission and seat adjustability, with @VWSTEVEO and @Ted_P. providing insights on the seat configurations.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle were raised, particularly regarding the RPM gauge which @PorschesandCats noted seemed off, indicating a potential issue. @jlewis3323 made requests for more detailed photographs, especially regarding the area below the battery to inspect for any possible bondo work, hinting at concerns over the vehicle's overall condition. @leftlane11 expressed doubt about whether the charm of owning a 914 could be sustained long term, questioning if any initial excitement faded quickly after five months. This reflects a degree of skepticism surrounding the vehicle's ongoing appeal and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters, particularly @Dawnpatrol450, have highlighted the vehicle's positive condition, noting its TX rust-free underside and the fact that it has no accidents reported. This gives prospective buyers reassurance about the vehicle's integrity. Additionally, @williamhmayjr from (The Seller) provided detailed maintenance records, listing significant repairs and part replacements that suggest the vehicle has been well cared for over the years. This transparency about maintenance history adds to the vehicle's appeal, indicating it has been consistently serviced.
Neutral: Several comments reflected curiosity regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition, with @Sims asking about any maintenance records beyond 2022 and details about potential leaks and the functionality of all components. @Jinyanv0319 inquired about the transmission fluid change history, while @mpls80210 sought information on the functionality of the air conditioning. These questions signify a general interest in due diligence from potential buyers, aiming to ensure they are making a well-informed decision.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @dtpeery about the lack of bids on the listing, which might indicate hesitance or lack of interest from potential buyers. @KcPorsche pointed out the illuminated airbag light in a photo, questioning its status during operation, which could be a potential safety issue. Furthermore, @williamj3 indicated a timing belt change might be due, suggesting that some maintenance items might not have been addressed timely, which could be a red flag for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are fascinated by the vehicle's striking Tahoe Blue color and design, with @yellowc7vert describing it as a "GORGEOUS 928." @cog_zoom shares admiration for the unique color combination, while @wurzitup praises its beauty, relating it to their own blue over blue 928. Similar sentiments arise from @linderpat, who notes how the paint pops and appreciates the interior, despite it potentially being divisive. @Raidonzap and @Thindor also express enthusiasm for its aesthetics and the possibility of assistance with shipping the vehicle, highlighting the community's shared excitement for this rare find.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about practical matters, like @Joemagic's question regarding shipping, with @Mickdoyle928 sharing his own successful experience of importing a 928. There are discussions about the car's features, such as the relevance of the rear bumperettes (@965) and the absence of a sunroof, which could be a point of interest for taller buyers. @Teutonic provides historical context regarding the unique paint options available for GTS models in the 90s, adding depth to the conversation around this specific car's rarity and specifications. Additionally, @darkstar81435 requests information on the timing belt service, emphasizing the importance of maintenance history.
Negative: On the downside, some commenters express concerns about certain aspects of the car. @zggs mentions a dislike for the interior color, stating it negatively impacts his impression of an otherwise beautiful car. @KawaMan comments on evidence of repainting on parts of the vehicle, stirring doubts about the car's originality and condition, while @ThejudgeRoy expresses a desire for a closer inspection to assess the interior's repaint status. Furthermore, @Carrerachas questions if any bodywork has been conducted, indicating skepticism among some potential buyers regarding transparency in the vehicle's past repairs.
|
 |
Positive: @Daniel_H expressed pure admiration for the vehicle, recalling a similar model he encountered that had been cherished by its owner for decades. @revron and @lbpa18 both complimented the car's stunning appearance, with @revron specifically mentioning his fondness for the Champagne Yellow color and @lbpa18 describing it as jaw-dropping. The seller, @boardhoarder, provided detailed history about the car, including the owner's long-term care and passion, which many in the comments appreciated, like @spreener and @Condorman who admired the owner's genuine enthusiasm and the captivating story of the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments brought up the vehicle's unique characteristics, such as @weissach noting that the car had some modifications on its nose that raised questions about its history. @pplkook and @carrera56 discussed the potential for underlying issues with the car while @gacksnabbit described it as sweet. The seller assured commenters about the car's inspection options and clarified that the auction is not operated by a dealer, but a listing service, as mentioned to @Ramjet63.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding the car's modifications and authenticity. @weissach pointed out discrepancies with the turn signal and bodywork, questioning the replacement parts. @356dax suggested that there may be issues under the paint that would require proper restoration, potentially making the cost of restoration high. Overall, while there is significant love for the classic model, there are understandably hesitations from some commenters regarding its restoration and originality.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and condition. @Dcmcc described it as a "stunning original condition" that is a joy to drive, emphasizing its historical significance as the first year for Chrysler power steering. @Dollycat3 noted its stylish details, including the Highlander upholstery, and praised its rarity, suggesting it is a hallmark of post-war American luxury. @ekmcmullen (The Seller) highlighted that the car glides down the road smoothly and is an example of careful preservation, which adds to its charm. Multiple users referred to the vehicle as a beautiful, well-preserved piece of automotive history with an excellent driving experience.
Neutral: Several commenters provided technical insights and inquired about specific features of the car. @Dunner53 asked about the condition of the brakes and tires, as well as fuel preferences, indicating a focus on the vehicle's operational aspects. @dancos raised questions regarding the car's top speed, while @Mystery_Trailer sought clarification on aspects of the sale process and title transfer due to the car being in a different state. Commenters like @howie12 discussed unique features such as the sealed-beam headlights, contributing insights into the car's engineering and history without strong emotional attachments.
Negative: There were few to no negative comments regarding the vehicle's condition or appeal, but some users focused on practical concerns. @63impalaboy pointed out the car's conservative design compared to later styles, suggesting a less exciting experience due to the absence of the Hemi engine. Additionally, the mention of the "half-assed" automatic transmission by @63impalaboy reflects a critique of the vehicle's technical features, suggesting a compromise between comfort and performance that might not satisfy all enthusiasts. Overall, while there were constructive critiques, they did not overshadow the overwhelmingly positive reception from the majority of commenters.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express strong admiration for the vehicle, particularly highlighting its versatility and capability. @DjangosHP describes it as a 'sweet bike' that has served its owner well on adventures, while @MCLeather shares their experience owning a similar model and commends its performance in varied conditions ranging from commuting to off-road challenges. @cbbnki notes that the Elefant is a great bike, especially for those who enjoy riding, and mentions the joy of the ride, echoing sentiments from other users about the delightful experience it promises even for long-distance travel. This sense of enthusiasm is mirrored in the comments about the model's engineering and the fun of handling it on different terrains.
Neutral: Several comments provide useful background information about the Ducati Elefant model without strong emotional leanings. @2hecknback explains the historical significance and engineering lineage of the Elefant, mentioning its unique design and context in motorcycling culture. @chandlerlewis, the seller, gives insights into the bike’s features, such as its weight and the adjustability of its suspension, helping potential buyers understand what they can expect from the motorcycle. Other users discuss details such as the rims and tires, providing additional context about the bike's specifications, which aids in painting a clear picture for interested parties.
Negative: Comments reflecting concerns are less frequent but still highlight certain issues that may affect prospective buyers. @Bigdagwood1 raises a question regarding the swingarm and shock remote reservoir, suggesting possible wear or modifications that may impact the bike's performance. @chandlerlewis addresses these concerns, indicating that modifications might have caused some aesthetic issues. However, such discussions of wear or repair do cast a slight shadow over the selling point of the motorcycle, suggesting that potential buyers might need to investigate these aspects further before making a decision.
|
 |
Positive: @2002WS6 praised the vehicle for its distinctive 8 lug wheels, indicating that they find this feature appealing. @RidleysRides described the car as "CRAZY BEAUTIFUL," and @58Charcoal noted that the vehicle is impressive from every angle and expresses regret for not having space for it. @hairyolds complimented the stunning color combination and suggested a minor adjustment to the ride height, implying that even small tweaks would enhance its appearance. Additionally, @RiffRaff remarked on the need to hear the engine run, expressing enthusiasm about the car's beauty and wishing the seller luck with their sale.
Neutral: @Noisyboyz brought up the unique color scheme of the convertible, questioning the presence of two paint colors. In response, @SavingManuals shared some insights that possibly indicate which colors were used on this particular car. This sparked further discussion, including comments from @Pfeil, who clarified that the Pontiac model in question had specific color combinations. @David_P expressed an interest in the tri-tone interior while suggesting that whitewall tires would enhance its look. @MMM288 asked about the refurbishment records and the engine's specifications to gather more information about the vehicle.
Negative: @Noisyboyz expressed skepticism regarding the paint colors, noting that the trim tag information is perplexing as Pontiacs from this era typically did not feature two colors on the body of a convertible. Additionally, @VIPERLOU claimed to have owned a former model of a different Pontiac but mentioned being unsure about the details relevant to the convertible's features. Overall, there were questions about the authenticity of the specifications mentioned for the car, leading to a hint of doubt about some claims made in the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: @TokyoMotorsDC highlights the vehicle's performance, stating it runs and drives well, indicating no complaints about its functionality. The seller also reassures @Lowbuck that parts are readily available from multiple sources, including G&R imports and eBay, making maintenance easier. Overall, the seller's confidence in the vehicle's condition is evident, enhancing its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @RS60Spyder requests the dimensions of the vehicle's bed, which @TokyoMotorsDC promptly provides as 63 inches long and 56 inches wide. This information could be crucial for buyers looking for specific storage capacities. Additionally, @andrewFFFF is interested in the unique features that distinguish this special edition from other models, indicating a broader interest in the vehicle's special attributes.
Negative: @wuzup7176 points out a possible prior impact or damage to the front passenger side bumper/bodywork, requesting further images for confirmation. This concern raises questions about the vehicle's history and condition, which could deter some potential buyers. Lastly, @kaijupartyhat inquires about the presence of the front Subaru emblem on the Sambar, suggesting there may be concerns regarding completeness or detail in the vehicle's presentation.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors are praising the 2009 Suburban 2500, highlighting its solid government-spec design and reliable mechanical components. @SuperKram appreciates the absence of the AFM system in the 6.0L engine, suggesting it leads to better performance and reduced maintenance issues. The vehicle is described as clean and well-maintained by @arm1985, who notes that the battery replacement history makes sense for a government vehicle. Commentors find the vehicle's lack of wear on the control buttons surprising, indicating it likely has been carefully handled.
Neutral: Several users are looking for specific details about the vehicle, such as its towing capacity, engine hours, and axle ratios. @Alvinmast (The Seller) provides a towing sticker reading 8600 lbs and claims the vehicle has 648 total hours on the engine. There are queries regarding the exhaust manifold bolts and the general condition, with @Badger1431 asking for insights into the battery replacement pattern and vehicle history. @Tigers196884 appreciates @Alvinmast's responsiveness and the thoroughness in answering vehicle-related inquiries.
Negative: Concerns are raised by some users regarding potential issues with the vehicle, such as the repeated battery replacements noted by @Badger1431, which may suggest past electrical problems. @Rsmillie inquires about a persistent check engine light, though @Alvinmast assures that it is off during operation. Additionally, @kasperville expresses uncertainty about the vehicle's underside condition, questioning whether it is surface dirt or actual rust. @Longmire45 hints at skepticism over the auction history with quips about its government background, trying to discern if it was bought from a CIA auction.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express strong appreciation for the vintage motorcycles offered, with several noting their historical significance and pristine condition. @Hoppy18 admires the value of the collection and @natew51 acknowledges the quality of the bikes, calling them amazing pieces. @RyderJones shares a personal connection by recalling the 1978 RM 125 as his first full-size race bike, emphasizing its nostalgic value, while @Dvredc5 reflects on the fascinating design similarities of the motorcycles offered, showcasing a deep passion for the brand and the era. The seller, MSCLASSICCARSLLC, receives positive feedback for his thorough descriptions and willingness to assist potential buyers with shipping arrangements.
Neutral: The seller, MSCLASSICCARSLLC, provides informative responses to various inquiries regarding the bikes' conditions and specifications. For instance, @Hansjrw requests to view a video demonstrating spark and air compression, while @evh1 suggests providing clear images of the gas tank interiors to clarify their condition. The seller clarifies that the bikes were restored and stored properly for many years and confirms that the RM400 features a plastic tank, emphasizing that there are no concerns about rust. Commenters also engage in discussions about the accuracy of the motorcycles in relation to their original specifications, with MSCLASSICCARSLLC indicating that while the bikes are not entirely correct, they can be easily restored to that condition if desired.
Negative: Some comments express reservations about the motorcycles. @Hansjrw raises concerns about the inability to start the bikes due to the long period of inactivity, requesting visual proof of functionality. @JGraham is conflicted about the bikes being too pristine to actually ride, feeling they might end up as mere display pieces instead. @OldGuy remarks on the inaccuracy of the bikes for their respective years, which might deter some collectors focused on originality. Furthermore, @Markwins123 is cautious about authenticity, noting potential misinterpretations of model specifications. Overall, while the motorcycles impress many, there are valid concerns regarding their usability and historical accuracy.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, with @GHUA noting that Tacomas are quite popular and will be fun to watch. @mini2nut highlighted the Tacoma TRD Pro hybrid's appealing color combo, which @SupraFreak confirmed is indeed a great choice, stating that the Ice Cap color was the only one showcased at the model's introduction for good reason. @mrdeezy declared it the best-looking truck ever made, emphasizing the striking appearance of the white/black new Tacoma Pro. Additionally, @PMUZI (The Seller) appreciated the positive feedback, reinforcing that the truck is amazing and thanking everyone for their bids.
Neutral: Some comments leaned towards gathering information rather than expressing strong opinions. @bryarb asked if there was more than one key FOB, to which @PMUZI (The Seller) confirmed there are two and mentioned an upcoming photo. @axelgonzalez inquired about the presence of a sunroof, and @SupraFreak responded that a moon roof does come standard with the TRD Pro model. @axelgonzalez also wanted to know about any lift installation, to which @PMUZI (The Seller) clarified that the lift is standard and the truck remains as it came from the factory.
Negative: There were no overtly negative comments about the vehicle. Instead, the discussions remain largely focused on appreciating the truck and seeking details. The questions posed did not indicate any dissatisfaction but rather a curiosity regarding its features, maintaining an overall positive and informative tone.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its beauty and craftsmanship, with @torynich describing an "excellent driving video" and @Ajax14 expressing admiration for the modifications made, describing the car as a beautifully put together 280Z. @baileyamps shares their enthusiasm for the factory audio system, mentioning a desire to restore a similar model, while @johnnyvett and @Knuckles-R-Busted reminisce about their past experiences with Z cars, reflecting fondly on their memories.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around information sharing and inquiries regarding the car's features and condition. @angelocj (The Seller) provides insights into the car's history since its purchase in 2017, details about maintenance, and confirms there are no issues with the seatbelts and gauges. @Mtntoyboy requests specific information on the dash condition and the vehicle's exhaust while stating it is a beautiful example of proper stewardship. Meanwhile, discussions about the car's AC system and requests for videos reflecting its operation further underscore the informative aspect of the comments.
Negative: There are some reservations expressed about the potential investment in the car, particularly by @Ajax14, who notes that recovering the investment in paintwork and modifications may be challenging. Additionally, @Pingputter questions the need for new tires in 2018, suggesting an underlying concern about the car's maintenance history. @shefe requests clarification on areas where body filler was used prior to the repaint, indicating a concern for the vehicle's integrity, while @drive4thejive raises logistical issues concerning transport, suggesting some potential hurdles for interested buyers.
|
20k-Mile, Original-Owner 2012 Mercedes-Benz E550 Cabriolet
WDDKK7DF0CF151017
Lot 240343
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the backstory of the vehicle and express admiration for its condition and story. @gscharnagl commends the beautiful car and wishes the seller luck in the auction. @dan1495 describes the car as a pristine example of a great vehicle, noting the smooth driving experience of the bi-turbo V8. The seller, @IndySam, has been proactive in detailing the maintenance history, sharing insights about the car's consistent care, and highlighting the special features that make it a beloved choice. Commenters like @cj11 and @Blue27 also affirm the quality and allure of the convertible.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in conversations about the auction process and the seller's responses. @vsheehan acknowledges the beauty of the car, and @Scottwl38 emphasizes how the seller's clear communication has made the auction an enjoyable experience. There are a few inquiries about specific vehicle features, including the functioning of the convertible top and the tire condition, which @IndySam addresses comprehensively. Overall, the community appears to appreciate the transparency and accessible nature of the auction.
Negative: A few concerns are raised regarding minor incidents involving the vehicle. @Tomtterrific asks about any issues with the convertible top actuators and windshield wash, which were satisfactorily addressed by the seller. Additionally, there are questions about the repairs made to the bumpers from previous accidents, highlighted by both @Tomtterrific and @mickeyg1. @IndySam clarifies that the repairs did not involve bumper replacements and were conducted at authorized Mercedes-Benz facilities, providing transparency regarding the vehicle's history. However, the existence of past incidents may deter some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle's remarkable low mileage and one-owner history, with @hangarplayer noting it has only 18,000 miles over 22 years. @Yags emphasizes the rarity of such low mileage and limited ownership, suggesting that many similar models have had multiple owners. @IndySam highlights the car's appeal, mentioning the replaced top hydraulics, which is a crucial maintenance point, and reflects on its status as one of the fastest production cars when it was new, appreciating its performance and aesthetic.
Neutral: Several comments focus on the car's aesthetics and overall presentation. @bpbaganz (The Seller) confirms that the vehicle has been well maintained and serviced at a dealership, providing detailed information about service status and some minor issues like the need for new tires and a few cosmetic imperfections. @Andymonium also praises the vehicle's look and notes the sleek bumper design, suggesting that the absence of parking sensors enhances its appearance.
Negative: Some concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised. @capnpete15 pointed out potential leather delamination issues in the interior, prompting a response from @bpbaganz (The Seller) that acknowledges bubbles in the leather but insists that the material is otherwise in good shape. Additionally, @Mooney201 mentions that a similar model he found has begun to show pressure issues in the ABC system, indicating some potential maintenance challenges ahead.
|
 |
Positive: @sdbdj (The Seller) highlights the value of the almost-new LCW Supreme Sprinter, noting it presents a great opportunity to save significant amounts for buyers in the market for a high-quality vehicle. The inclusion of original OEM wheels adds further value to the offering. @Risip350 shares positive feedback about their own LCW sprinter, emphasizing its functionality during volleyball tournaments, particularly appreciating the spaciousness allowed by omitting a bathroom, which resulted in ample room for luggage.
Neutral: @laruemartin expresses skepticism about the prevalence of liens in custom transport conversion buses, questioning the financial reliability of businesses purchasing them. This comment raises a valid concern about the financial arrangements surrounding the sale of such vehicles, which could influence buyer perception.
Negative: @laruemartin critiques the current conversion as odd due to the absence of a rear bathroom, which is typically expected in executive transport models. Furthermore, although @sdbdj (The Seller) explains that the plumbing for a bathroom is installed and could be re-added, this may not alleviate concerns for some buyers who prioritize having a bathroom readily available.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the Moto Guzzi 1000S, emphasizing its rarity and classic appeal. @SuperKram praised the bike's magical air-cooled sound and the race-derived Tonti frame, highlighting its agile handling. @Motogrotto enthusiastically noted that the 1000S represents the sweet spot for the Marque and confirmed the seller, @eldoradotim, possesses extensive knowledge about these motorcycles. Additionally, @SDCR referred to the model as one of the 'Holy Grail' bikes and remarked on its infrequent availability, while @Bownez appreciated the medium valve engine's sweet performance and the striking green color.
Neutral: Several users engaged in technical discussions regarding the 1000S, particularly focusing on its components and aftermarket options. @fredtman inquired about the availability of hard bags and mounts, while @SDCR provided information on compatible aftermarket bags for the Tonti frame. @66Malibu shared personal history about owning a ‘93 1000S, reflecting on the changes made to the bike, and @Motogrotto clarified details about the significant reliability upgrades made in later models of this motorcycle. Overall, the conversations balanced technical insights about the bike with stories of personal ownership.
Negative: While the comments were mostly positive, there were some mentions of aspects that could be seen in a less favorable light. @66Malibu mentioned concerns over the increasing difficulty in sourcing parts for Moto Guzzis and noted that some previous ownership decisions were regrettable. @Motogrotto criticized the factory mirrors as being unattractive, suggesting their removal enhances the bike's aesthetic. Additionally, @eldoradotim encountered challenges in posting a running video of the bike due to weather conditions and personal commitments, which frustrated some viewers awaiting more visual content.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle's overall design and features. @Silberpfeil praised the truck as being perfect in every way, indicating satisfaction with its condition. @weim55 noted that the truck is 'loaded' with desirable features such as a radio, heater, and mirrors, highlighting the value it presents compared to simpler models. Further, @mjhbat64 (The Seller) confidently stated that the vehicle is roadworthy, mentioning that he and a friend would not hesitate to drive it across the country, indicating a strong belief in its reliability and performance.
Neutral: Several comments reflected on the truck's history and condition. @mjhbat64 (The Seller) shared insights about the truck's origin, stating it belonged to a friend's uncle and had a local history, which may enhance its sentimental value. There were inquiries about specific vehicle details, such as the condition of the floorboards from @jdt10768, and the assurance from @mjhbat64 (The Seller) that he would provide clear photographs to address these concerns. The mention of the replaced steering coupler in 2022 was acknowledged as a positive attribute of the truck's maintenance.
Negative: There were some concerns about the functionality of certain components. @joehammer questioned the wipers, suggesting potential issues that might require attention. @JGL101 asked if the truck was suitable for long-distance trips, implying some doubt regarding its reliability for extensive travel. Additionally, @jdt10768 raised the issue of the absence of seatbelts, which @mjhbat64 (The Seller) confirmed, leading to concerns about safety. Overall, while the truck is described positively, these comments indicate that potential buyers should be aware of its limitations.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @genevamotorcars, is praised for their transparent communication regarding the vehicle's minor damage report and their willingness to allow potential buyers to conduct a pre-purchase inspection (PPI). @Jcraigz commended the seller for their integrity in not underestimating the impact of "minor damage" without proper documentation. Additionally, @BMcD acknowledged that this is an exceptional offering from a well-established dealer, highlighting their engagement and reputation in the market.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information about the vehicle and its condition, such as @Xxalpine inquiring about the transmission and infotainment systems, and @BMcD asking for a cold start video which the seller agreed to provide. @bobsct requested clarification about the vehicle's towing capabilities, which was confirmed by the seller. A discussion regarding the missing title was also mentioned, where the seller reassured potential buyers about the status of the title issue and expected resolution.
Negative: Commenters like @leftlane11 expressed skepticism about the seller's assessment of the impact of minor accidents on the vehicle's value, suggesting that perceptions can vary between buying and selling situations. @IronSwapper raised concerns about the engine's idle sound during the cold start video, fearing it may indicate potential issues. Lastly, @Jcraigz remained unconvinced about the value of "minor damage," citing personal experience and the tendency to expect discounts in similar situations.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is presented as a non-smoker, which is a positive aspect for buyers concerned about odors. @iakllc (The Seller) confirmed that the car comes with some essential details, such as its tire date codes being from 2025, indicating relatively new tires. Furthermore, the seller has assured prospective buyers that there are no rust or leaks, bolstering the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Neutral: Comments from users indicated some queries and clarifications about the specifications and condition of the vehicle, such as the lack of Airmatic suspension and a request for additional undercarriage photos to provide reassurance on vehicle condition. Additionally, @Tiberiu raised a concern about the right side turn signal blinking faster than the left side, which may indicate a bulb issue, while @Darkstar0821 inquired about a potential door ding and suggested improvements to the engine start video.
Negative: There were some concerns noted by commenters about the vehicle. @jndaniell initially questioned the presence of rust and leaks, although @iakllc (The Seller) addressed this by stating there are none. However, issues were raised by @Tiberiu regarding the turn signal’s inconsistent blinking, which could imply deeper electrical problems, and @Darkstar0821 pointed out a potential door ding, highlighting minor cosmetic flaws that could deter some buyers.
|
2024 Mercedes-AMG GT63 S E Performance 4-Door Coupe Manufaktur Edition
W1K7X7KB5RV003287
Lot 240350
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Lbrezenoff emphasizes the incredible features of the vehicle, highlighting its remarkable engineering and performance. The car is equipped with a powerful twin-turbocharged 4.0-liter V8 and an electric motor, delivering an astonishing combined output of 831 horsepower and 1,032 lb-ft of torque. The seller notes the car has received lifetime warranty coverage for its paint protection and ceramic finishes, enhancing its value and appeal. @Scottcrystal appreciates its powerful capabilities and luxurious color, wishing good luck for the auction.
Neutral: Several comments discuss the vehicle's features and operational modes. @kevinckb6 raises a question regarding the exhaust sound during cold starts, to which @Lbrezenoff explains the car initially operates in electric mode, transitioning seamlessly to gas when more power is needed. @Gnmotoring inquires about the nature of the rear spoiler, which @Lbrezenoff clarifies is fixed and designed for high-speed stability. Additionally, @Way2fast asks about California smog regulations for this specific model, and the seller provides reassurance about its compliance with state emissions standards.
Negative: However, some doubts arise regarding the vehicle's suitability for everyday use. @absent expresses concerns about the exhaust noise being excessively loud during daily driving, potentially drawing unwanted attention from other drivers. They acknowledge the car's impressive performance but mention the Renntech modifications that might contribute to its power increase. These points suggest that while the AMG GT 63 S E Performance shines in terms of speed and technology, it may not be ideal for those seeking a quieter driving experience.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the condition of the 2011 Volvo XC70 T6 on auction. @Otto1210 (The Seller) highlights that the vehicle has been well-preserved, having spent its life mostly garage-kept and serviced by reputable dealers. The car's low mileage of only 29,800 miles and the overall excellent mechanical and cosmetic condition have been noted positively by bidders, with @cenadris and @VolvoDoug expressing admiration for the vehicle's appearance and upkeep. The seller's transparency about the car's history, including inspections and maintenance updates, also received praise, showcasing a commitment to honesty in the selling process.
Neutral: Several inquiries regarding specific vehicle details highlight a general interest in understanding more about the Volvo XC70's condition and history. @cenadris posed questions regarding brake wear, tire condition, and the drilled hole for the rearview camera, seeking clarification on these points. @VolvoDoug inquired about the availability of summer mats and the status of the serpentine belt, further indicating a desire for comprehensive information before bidding. The seller’s responses indicate a willingness to provide additional details and transparency, such as confirming recent inspections and clarifying maintenance records, demonstrating a mutual interest in ensuring prospective buyers are well-informed.
Negative: Despite the positive comments, there are concerns raised that point to potential issues with the vehicle. @StanGB noted dissatisfaction with the fuel efficiency of Volvos in general, indicating a critical view of the engineering. Additionally, @cenadris raised questions about the uneven brake wear and the possibility of water entering through the drilled hole for the rear camera. @VolvoDoug's inquiry about the age of the serpentine belt and tensioner suggests a potential maintenance concern that could require attention. These comments indicate that while the car is generally considered well-kept, there are considerations that may affect potential buyers' decisions.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments express a sense of security regarding the vehicle's frame condition, especially from @Oip (The Seller), who reassured that the rust is only surface-level. @Oip also mentioned that the driver's and passenger's floors had been professionally repaired, which adds to the confidence in the vehicle's overall condition. Additionally, the seller shared their personal driving experience, indicating that they have had no issues during local trips, which suggests reliability to potential buyers.
Neutral: Some commenters, such as @skkzvw, sought further clarity on the vehicle's comfort for long-distance travel, indicating a desire for more information rather than outright criticism or praise. @robstu's inquiry about the rust on the frame shows a cautious approach from potential buyers who want to ensure the vehicle's structural integrity before making a decision. The seller's response to these questions demonstrates a willingness to engage with potential buyers and address their concerns.
Negative: There are hints of concern regarding the vehicle's age and the potential for unforeseen issues, as expressed by @skkzvw's question about comfort for a long journey. The mention of surface rust, even though it was addressed by @Oip, may still raise red flags for some buyers wary of older vehicles. Overall, the discussions suggest a mix of apprehension about reliability and the inherent risks of purchasing an older car.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments express admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive build and aesthetics. @MonteCutlass described it as a 'Mean machine!' while @redboots praised it as a 'Nice looking Cutlass with a Rocket V8.' @Kube called it 'wicked cool', and @Breezejammer was astounded by the build, exclaiming 'WOW what an incredible build!' Additionally, @mike_rockwell emphasized the performance aspect, stating that the driving video was 'earthshaking, brutal & straight' and that the vehicle's setup is 'outstanding'. The overall sentiment is that this Cutlass is a remarkable blend of power, style, and engineering.
Neutral: Commenters also voiced their curiosity and sought further details about the vehicle. @675MIZU inquired about the missing dyno graphs mentioned in the ad, while @BigMikeC asked if there were photos of the undercarriage and suspension available. @Spsracing reflected on their nostalgia for Oldsmobiles in general, noting their appreciation for the car's convertible body, and @pghpainter was interested in the associated bidding process and mentioned the need for quick lottery numbers. @Dragonslayer raised a question about the title transfer process, showing concern over potential bureaucratic issues.
Negative: Some comments included critiques and concerns about the vehicle. @Caymanorcarrera expressed disappointment, referring to it as 'what an Oldsmobile...and NOT your Grandma’s Cutlass.' @ko_nyc humorously remarked about their surprise at ending up with an Oldsmobile after searching for a Ferrari. There were also practical queries about the title and the condition of the car beyond its aesthetics, with @Dragonslayer specifically mentioning previous issues with title transfers in Pennsylvania, as well as the implications of not having ready access to some vehicle documentation.
|
 |
Positive: @rustyrotors noted that the rebuilt 2.3L motor looks impressive, resembling a GoWesty long block. They mentioned that the van appears to be a clean example of a Weekender model, indicating overall satisfaction with its condition. Another comment from @baryon, the seller, confirmed that they uploaded additional photos requested by @Fargie, enhancing transparency about the vehicle's state.
Neutral: @Fargie raised important questions regarding the vehicle's restoration needs, asking for detailed photos of the seats and floors. They inquired about the functionality of the vehicle's climate controls and expressed curiosity about the upper bunk pads, questioning their compatibility with the vehicle's interior. @hudson41 brought up a technical aspect regarding the vehicle's dashboard gauges, raising a good point about the absence of a RPM gauge, which could impact potential buyers' interests in performance details.
Negative: @Fargie also hinted at possible issues with the vehicle, asking for clarification on rust and engine performance in traffic. @baryon acknowledged there is some rust on the muffler but insisted there are no significant rust issues elsewhere, attributing the van's longevity to its life in a dry climate. However, @Fargie expressed concern over potential cosmetic imperfections and the van's overall readiness without additional repairs.
|
 |
Positive: @msheldonsb appreciates the beauty of the car, noting that despite its low mileage of 50 miles over three years, it should be driven more often. @HG52 is excited about the variety of Shelby models available, hinting at an exciting auction environment. @1967Shelby expresses admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics, stating it checks all the boxes and appreciates its rarity alongside @Coralsnake's commentary.
Neutral: @rocketjohnny reminisces about owning a similar car years ago, indicating a connection to the vehicle's history rather than its current market value. @Rspcar1 (The Seller) highlights the rarity of the car, supported by data from a Marti Report that reveals only five similar vehicles were produced. @drc3x inquires about the number of red and gold models, indicating an interest in the specifics of the production numbers without making a firm judgment about the car's value.
Negative: @wonhulio raises concerns about owners expecting high prices despite the vehicle missing parts, particularly noting the absence of smog equipment. @oldcanuck poses a skeptical question about the car's ram air, equating it to the rarity of a space saver tire in the vehicle. @Coralsnake advises that every six-figure car should undergo a thorough inspection prior to purchase, suggesting potential issues that may not be disclosed.
|
 |
Positive: @porkpiehat expresses excitement about the vehicle, likening it to a cool character, while @Steve Bolander appreciates its aesthetics with a comment about the fangs. @GLWA and @boaboyoz both admire the car's color and overall appearance, praising it as a magnificent maroon Impala and a wonderful build. @Brujo04, the seller, emphasizes the quality of the restoration work by mentioning that it was done by professionals without any shortcuts, indicating a high standard of craftsmanship.
Neutral: @Brujo04 mentions that the vehicle has been no expense spared in its restoration and details its performance with a confident assertion that it handles like a sports car and is quick with its 6-liter engine. The comment suggests an objective view of the vehicle's capabilities but does not express a strong opinion one way or the other regarding resale or personal connection.
Negative: There are no negative comments mentioned regarding the vehicle, suggesting that the overall sentiment about the car is predominantly positive. Additionally, since all comments reflect admiration or satisfaction, there are no criticisms or complaints noted that would imply dissatisfaction.
|
 |
Positive: @Redbird41 appreciates the OG Demon, describing it as an awesome car that is incredibly comfortable and handles well. The driver enjoys it, despite noting a potential issue with the main screen. @buybid22 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm about the vehicle's perfect specifications and pristine condition, emphasizing that the drag box remains unopened. @boaboyoz describes the black Demon as pristine perfection and an exquisite example, while @RayBarton528 acknowledges the beauty of the car while expressing a preference for the D170.
Neutral: @fgh simply states that it's a great car, hoping it performs well. @thelastride mentions a nice build and wishes good luck to the seller, while also inquiring about tire choices and oil change history, showing an interest in practical aspects of car ownership. @buybid22 (The Seller) reassures @thelastride that there are no liens and confirms that the oil service was done last month, addressing potential buyer concerns.
Negative: @KurtWalters raises concerns about the quality control during the production of the 2018 model, noting production issues with the 2023 models, indicating a decline in manufacturing standards. There is a subtle implication that despite the car's performance, earlier models may be superior. This indicates a nuanced perspective on the vehicle's reliability and the manufacturing processes of recent years.
|
 |
Positive: @wem5310 expressed a strong appreciation for the vehicle, specifically praising its color and overall appearance. @TRW1992 commended the E39 528i's classic styling, highlighting its durability and enjoyable driving experience, particularly with the manual transmission. @corkscrewlife shared their fondness for this specific model, labeling it as one of the best BMWs ever made and noting the rarity of finding one in such excellent condition. Additionally, @redemption2020, who has owned multiple E39s, assured potential buyers about the longevity of the engine, calling the auction winner's experience a guaranteed satisfaction.
Neutral: @aSingh39, the seller, provided background information about the vehicle, explaining that it had low mileage and very little use under previous ownership. Acknowledging comments and questions from potential buyers, the seller offered prompt responses regarding the car's condition and readiness for the next owner. The seller also mentioned that a drive video would be shared soon, creating a sense of anticipation among interested bidders while encouraging engagement through questions.
Negative: There were some inquiries and concerns about the vehicle's condition from potential buyers. @johndlewis asked if there were any issues and whether everything worked as originally intended. @Rudi2 raised a question regarding the absence of the lower engine splash shield in one of the pictures, seeking clarification on whether it was removed during service. @jagmo wanted to confirm if there were any leaks or if the rubber molding around the windshield needed replacement, illustrating potential apprehensions that some bidders have about the car's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @CRJ900XJ praised the vehicle's color, noting that it looks very nice in the sunlight with a slight metallic finish. @pphnter described the car as beautiful and expressed love for everything about it while inquiring about the hi-fi sound system, implying a generally positive view of the vehicle's aesthetics and features. Additionally, @bocabimmer highlighted that he has a similar car that he absolutely loves, reinforcing the positive sentiment towards the vehicle overall.
Neutral: There was a discussion about the accuracy of the listing related to the wheel size, with @bocabimmer pointing out that while the Essentials section listed the wheels as 20 inches, the Details section stated 19 inches. @Hdecker83, the seller, acknowledged the confusion and thanked @bocabimmer for bringing it to their attention, leading to the correction. @RyanWoods asked for additional information regarding the keys and the accident history, to which @Hdecker83 responded by confirming the vehicle comes with two keys and provided a picture related to the accident, clarifying its cause.
Negative: @Piston- expressed concern about what appeared to be a strange pattern on the side door panels in certain pictures, suggesting a potential issue with the vehicle's condition. @Beksy noted what looked like scuffs or stains on the seats, raising a question about the vehicle's interior quality. @pphnter mentioned a significant drawback regarding the missing Harmon Kardon sound system, indicating that this could be a dealbreaker for them, highlighting the vehicle's perceived shortcomings.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the beauty and rarity of the Cadillac Series 62, emphasizing its classic design and historical significance. @notlikelytowin4 noted that there are not many pre-war Cadillacs left, while @Tripledigit described it as a potential design study, claiming modern designers should take notes from its elegance. Other users, such as @Cadillacin75 and @MikeFiftyNine, praised the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, acknowledging its exceptional condition for being nearly 100 years old, with @treetrimmer declaring it a 'show stopper'. @Dollycat3 and @Hoppy18 highlighted the unique color and luxurious curves of the car, dubbing it a stunning piece of Americana.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the Cadillac's specifications and historical context without leaning strongly toward admiration or criticism. For instance, @Kfpate (The Seller) responded to inquiries about the vehicle's VIN information and data tags, confirming the accuracy of descriptions and providing additional details about the car's components. User @oldsmobile98 elaborated on the naming conventions used by Cadillac for their vehicles and clarified the significance of the Series 62, which was a mainstream Cadillac model. Both @chuck8731 and @CaddyLou engaged in discussions about the correct color for the vehicle, suggesting it appeared closer to Oceano Blue rather than the originally stated Antoinette Blue, emphasizing the importance of authenticity in classic car restoration.
Negative: While most comments were positive, there were some concerns regarding the vehicle's history and maintenance. @Belhambra1 asked if any rust repairs had ever been made and inquired about the underbody condition, highlighting common apprehensions associated with classic cars. @Kfpate (The Seller) acknowledged the car's age and potential for wear, citing a past water pump leak and a lack of guarantees about the floorboards' condition. Additionally, there was a request for a cold start video to demonstrate the car's performance, emphasizing a desire for transparency and thorough inspection before purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @Chase519 commented on how pretty the car is and expressed a personal love for its color, wishing the seller luck with the sale despite the car being too far away for them to bid. The overall aesthetic appeal of the vehicle is highlighted as a positive attribute by some observers.
Neutral: @Scliffe inquired about the front suspension parts, hydraulic hoses, and timing tensioners, showing a general interest in the mechanical condition without expressing a strong opinion. @daveindian also asked about the functionality of the accessories and any potential issues but did so without a clear leaning toward positive or negative sentiment.
Negative: @VintagePete asked the seller if there are plans for any videos, which could imply some skepticism about the listing without visual evidence. However, @daveindian's questioning about the condition of the engine, transmission, brakes, and electrical items could suggest a concern regarding potential hidden issues, creating a more cautious tone.
|
 |
Positive: @Jfisher89 commented that the vehicle is super clean and has a very mean looking design, acknowledging that coupes like this one are not commonly seen. @ChadBugg68 shared their enthusiasm for the CTSV coupes, stating that they are fun to drive and draw attention. @Dominooch, who was the previous owner, confirmed that the car has impressive performance metrics, boasting 744 RWHP as noted by @Shaun_CTSV (The Seller).
Neutral: @Shaun_CTSV (The Seller) provided specific details regarding the vehicle’s performance, mentioning that he has a spec sheet showing the impressive dyno result but didn't include an exact date in the listing. When asked about driving videos, he mentioned that there is currently a video in the gallery but he doesn't have a full in-car video available at this moment. Additionally, @Demoner1 asked about the lien amount, to which @Shaun_CTSV (The Seller) responded that the current payoff is around $8,000, with processes in place for transferring the title after the sale.
Negative: Several commenters expressed concern over the vehicle's condition and parts, with @SmokeFan14 inquiring about the TPMS light being on, attributing it to the aftermarket wheels lacking sensors. @Fuk questioned whether the original wheels and the engine cover are included, to which @Shaun_CTSV (The Seller) confirmed that he does not have the stock wheels or the engine cover, which may have been removed for aftermarket upgrades. Overall, questions regarding additional costs, such as the lien, were common, indicating uncertainty about the overall sale process.
|
 |
Positive: @ckwaveski commented on the vehicle's appearance, praising the grille and headlight nacelles as some of the greatest automotive aesthetics. Additionally, @mcqueens (The Seller) confirmed that all the gauges in the vehicle work, ensuring a functional and aesthetically pleasing driving experience.
Neutral: @DHorn11 inquired if there is any rust present on the vehicle and requested pictures for verification. In response, @mcqueens (The Seller) indicated that the truck is rust-free, assuaging concerns regarding its condition. @DHorn11 further sought clarification about the rust condition by referencing the pictures provided.
Negative: @DHorn11 expressed genuine concern about the potential presence of rust on the vehicle, questioning whether it is visible in the provided pictures. This need for clarification underscores a worry about the vehicle's condition, despite the seller's assurances.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the motorcycle, highlighting its aesthetics and performance. @Farfegnugin noted that even though they aren't a motorcycle enthusiast, they found the bike to be captivating. @Leonia described it as 'sexy' and 'fast', while @Fginn complimented its classic retro look and stated that it runs strong and fast. The seller also received specific praise for the bike's unique features, such as the raised lettering on the Avon Cobra tires, which @Cheth20 inquired about, and the Triumph optional quilted seat, which @Fginn asked about as well.
Neutral: Throughout the comments, there were practical inquiries and discussions regarding the motorcycle's features and modifications. @TheOldGarage1Cali wondered about the relocation of the speedometer and its purpose, prompting insight from the seller about the changes made for stylistic reasons. Similarly, @Steelrydr asked if the shock mount had been affected by the installation of the strut, to which the seller assured that the original shock could be reinstated without issues. Other questions included those about riding videos from @Jonesy66 and the functionality of turn signals from @NorthShoreIslander, showcasing a mix of curiosity and engagement from potential buyers.
Negative: Some comments indicated concerns, particularly regarding comfort and practicality. @Mustang8 humorously mentioned that their back hurt just by looking at the bike, suggesting that it may not be ideal for longer rides. @shayjm33 asked about the ride quality with the solid strut and the impact on comfort after extended periods, reflecting a shared concern among users about the feasibility of riding such a bike for long durations. These concerns, while not harsh, pointed to possible discomfort associated with the motorcycle's features.
|
 |
Positive: @TokyoMotorsDC (The Seller) provides a detailed and informative overview of the Suzuki Carry DA62T, highlighting its significant improvements over earlier generations, particularly the updated K6A engine which offers long-term reliability with a timing chain. The seller also emphasizes the refinements made in 2001 and encourages potential buyers to check out a video that explains the differences in detail.
Neutral: @Vale1985ntino inquires about registering the vehicle in California, to which @TokyoMotorsDC (The Seller) responds that it is possible if the vehicle is made SMOG compliant, although it can be a costly process. The seller suggests that some owners choose to register the vehicle in states like Montana to avoid the hassle. @funcitychris and @edinpgh discuss the production date of the vehicle, with @edinpgh noting discrepancies in the chassis number decoder, indicating a collaborative effort among commenters to clarify the vehicle's details.
Negative: Comments from @funcitychris and @edinpgh reflect some confusion surrounding the vehicle's production date and registration complexity. @edinpgh points out potential inaccuracies in the chassis number information, which could impact buyer confidence. Additionally, questions arise about the vehicle's real-world top speeds, with @JustMe1 asking about performance, leading to a discussion about the expected cruising speed which some may find underwhelming at around 50 mph.
|
 |
Positive: @SharkTank001 believes that the vehicle, with its 79k miles, could be an excellent driver as it is just starting to reach its potential. The seller, @TJF-1, provides detailed responses to inquiries, showcasing a willingness to clarify concerns and share information about the vehicle's modifications, such as the custom trunk that has been aesthetically altered yet retains its functionality. Furthermore, @TJF-1 has ensured that all electronics are in working order, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several commenters are seeking further information on specific aspects of the vehicle. @SkinnyB is curious about the wires hanging near the pedals, reaching out for clarification about their purpose. @jansoto requests details regarding a 'duplicate' notation on the title, and @TJF-1 explains the significance of this notation, confirming its validity for ownership transfer. Additionally, @SlightlyBrokeGuy suggests the posting of a driving video, indicating a common desire among users to better understand the vehicle's performance.
Negative: There are concerns from some users, particularly regarding the modifications made to the trunk. @raytwotimes questions the ease of repairing a hole in the trunk and whether such changes would be permanent, hinting at potential issues with the vehicle's structure. While @TJF-1 provides background on the modifications, explaining the previous owner's customizations, the uncertainty expressed by @raytwotimes regarding repairs raises valid concerns about the vehicle's long-term integrity.
|
9k-Kilometer 1998 Nissan Atlas Double Cab Fire Truck 4WD 5-Speed
N6F23005739
Lot 240386
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters appreciate the unique characteristics of this truck, with @Manjay highlighting its clean appearance and expressing eagerness about the auction outcome. @boaboyoz describes the Nissan Atlas Double Cab as 'totally fab' and appreciates its fire truck history, while @oceanbluemetallic calls it 'FIRE,' indicating it's a perfect vehicle for social gatherings and guaranteed to attract attention. The seller, @Jeff1932, supports these sentiments by emphasizing that the truck is a fully functional vehicle and expresses confidence in its condition, thanking bidders for their interest.
Neutral: Several inquiries sought clarification about the truck's specifications and modifications. @gl21133 asked about the timing chain, while @Rolypoly wondered about the original firefighting equipment. @Edward68 raised questions regarding the functionality of the side panels on the bed, indicating a lack of visible latches in photos. @gunnar719 and @Jwd1977 both requested additional measurements, including the truck's height, length, and bed dimensions, showing that potential buyers are keen to understand the vehicle's full capabilities before proceeding with their bids. The seller addressed these inquiries thoroughly, offering detailed responses about the truck's measurements and construction.
Negative: There are some concerns raised, particularly about the modifications made to the truck. @Crankepants specifically questioned the vehicle's height regarding emergency lights, which reflects uncertainty about its practical usability. Additionally, @Edward68's comments about the side panels indicate apprehension regarding their structural integrity, suggesting they might not be functional as intended. Despite @Jeff1932 clarifying these points—stating that the side panels were welded and explaining their current state—concerns linger that could impact potential buyers' confidence.
|
 |
Positive: @AngelsMotors has provided a warm welcome to the auction participants, showcasing a beautiful 2009 Mini Cooper Convertible with the John Cooper Works trim and a unique Interchange Yellow color. The seller emphasizes the car's condition, describing it as super clean and offering a no-reserve auction, which adds excitement for potential buyers. @AngelsMotors also reassures buyers by encouraging inspections and test drives, displaying transparency and confidence in the vehicle's quality.
Neutral: Inquiries from potential buyers included questions about the vehicle's clutch condition and its emissions history. @davidmelkins asked about a past emissions failure, to which @AngelsMotors explained that as a dealer, they weren't able to provide specific details about the car's history in 2024 but assured future buyers that they would provide a smog test. @Moanalolo sought clarification on the transmission, and the seller responded that all vehicles undergo mandatory inspections, indicating no current issues.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the car's emissions passing history, which could raise red flags for some buyers. Additionally, potential issues with the clutch were pointed out by @Moanalolo, indicating people are wary of potential hidden problems with the vehicle. However, @AngelsMotors attempted to address these concerns by explaining the car's current condition and the protocols in place for ensuring quality.
|
 |
Positive: @TrasyTodd praised the vehicle as a reliable, capable, and comfortable model, believing this specific Blazer is a well-maintained example that is likely to make potential buyers happy. @billyf1000 expressed nostalgia for the model, highlighting its beauty and emphasizing eagerness to receive more details about its condition. @steve575 (The Seller) conveyed confidence in the truck's originality and condition, offering transparency about its features and well-preserved factory finishes, further supported by numerous requests met for additional photos about the vehicle's undercarriage and paintwork.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @dirtyvic and @Chevy-Ed, raised pertinent questions regarding the vehicle's functionality and maintenance history, such as inquiries about the air conditioning system, tire conditions, and mechanical work performed. @jmcatee sought clarification about the mileage stated on the title, wanting to confirm accuracy. @steve575 (The Seller) was proactive in providing information to address these inquiries, confirming recent work and detailing the vehicle's operational status without making any direct claims about needing repairs.
Negative: Concerns were voiced by @dirtyvic regarding potential structural rust visible in one of the images, leading to questions about the vehicle's integrity and whether it could affect the functionality of the rear gate. @Chevy-Ed pointed out issues related to rust that might need attention and questioned if the transmission or axle had been rebuilt. @JustMe1 also sought clarifications on potential touch-ups or repair areas, indicating apprehension about the overall condition of the paintwork and its authenticity.
|
 |
Positive: Commentators praised the vehicle for its excellent condition and detailed presentation. @Double-E highlighted the clean documentation and the advantages of the vehicle's setup, suggesting it would serve well as a highway cruiser and light off-roading vehicle. @BTC4020 appreciated the extensive photo documentation, noting that the Jeep appears to be in great shape. @carchasers (The Seller) provided reassurance regarding the Jeep's overall maintenance and condition, stating the original owner took great care of it over the past 22 years, with smooth operation of the mechanical components.
Neutral: Several commenters inquired about specific features and maintenance records. @Mulefan3220 was interested in the DOT date on the tires and wondered about maintenance history due to the vehicle's age. @jepca raised a concern regarding open recalls, and @salp55 asked about the condition of the shocks and motor mounts. The seller addressed these concerns, confirming that necessary recall parts were ordered, and he assured potential buyers about the vehicle's operational integrity and recent maintenance.
Negative: A few concerns were expressed regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @Optionman pointed out wear on the driver's seat bolster, criticizing the seller for not highlighting it adequately in the listing. @timmclean mentioned past issues he experienced with a similar model, questioning whether the blend door issues were addressed. Additionally, @Mulefan3220 expressed a desire for new tires, indicating a preference for fresh rubber despite the seller stating that the current tires are still in excellent condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed high praise for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetics and performance. @JAThacker called it "very nice indeed," while @shkayb95 described it as a "beautiful example" and a "MOTOR!" @SuperKram enthusiastically noted the clean frame, calling it "sexy as hell" and commendable for towing capabilities. @BruceBraman, interested in the vehicle, complimented its appearance as a "beautiful rig," showing a strong appreciation for the Suburban's overall look. Additionally, @Wayne962 compared it favorably to his own truck, sharing excitement over the "bragging rights" associated with the powerful 8.1L engine.
Neutral: The seller, @Shaank94, actively engaged with potential buyers, providing detailed information about the Suburban's history and features. He shared that the vehicle was previously owned by an elderly gentleman who mainly used it for vacations, indicating the well-maintained condition due to freeway mileage. In response to specific inquiries about dimensions and features, @Shaank94 assured interested parties about the cargo space and functionality of various systems, such as AC and seat adjustments, while also offering to provide additional videos and photos to facilitate the sale.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there were some inquiries about potential issues. @jvmiv questioned a hole in the passenger rear door, seeking clarity on its cause and the vehicle's last inspection. Others raised concerns about the reliability of the installed alarm system and fuel efficiency, with @cdwatnsu humorously remarking on the 8.1L engine's fuel consumption. While these concerns reflect some buyers' skepticism, they were handled by the seller, who assured that the vehicle is in good working condition and has no leaks.
|
 |
Positive: @Tkernodle (The Seller) emphasizes that the car has never had mechanical issues during their ownership that would prevent it from being drivable and safe, highlighting its reliability. They express confidence in the vehicle's performance, stating that with new tires, it could be driven anywhere, and they suggest it's a well-maintained, enjoyable sports car. Additionally, they mention spare parts, including rear brake pads and a master cylinder, further indicating the vehicle's readiness for maintenance needs. The seller appreciates the car and states it's hard to part with, seeing it as a great value and fun to drive.
Neutral: Several questions are raised regarding specific features and conditions of the vehicle, such as the sunroof's functionality and the tire specifications. Comments from @G4horse and others seek clarification about potential issues with the sunroof, the condition of the tires, and factory options. @Markflores73 inquiries about service history and any faults indicated by sensors, while @Ecosse requests details on whether the car is a C2 or C4. The seller provides thorough answers, including confirmation of tire sizes and a clear maintenance record, which adds to the informational transparency about the car.
Negative: Concerns regarding the vehicle arise with comments from @TexSquirrel and @Fargie, who question the sunroof's problems and seek to understand what specifically might be malfunctioning. Furthermore, there are potential issues hinted at regarding the registration history mentioned by @Markflores73, regarding gaps that may imply previous mechanical issues. Despite the seller's assurances, lingering apprehensions about the car's overall condition and the sunroof's capability remain aspects that could dissuade potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Bavarianchops described the vehicle as cool, indicating a positive initial impression. @pmanzpmanz (The Seller) shared a heartwarming introduction of the vehicle named Pearl, highlighting how it has been a faithful companion during home renovation projects. The seller emphasized Pearl's readiness for new adventures and her ability to spread joy, suggesting that potential buyers can look forward to having fun with her.
Neutral: @abscars inquired about the vehicle's capability for a long-distance trip on non-interstate roads, showing interest in its performance. The seller, @pmanzpmanz, confidently responded that Pearl could handle such a trip with ease, noting the excellent tire tread but admitting a lack of specific details about the tire age.
Negative: @abscars also raised concerns about the vehicle's history, specifically asking if it had been involved in the Asheville floods a couple of years ago. @pmanzpmanz (The Seller) addressed this concern, confirming that Pearl was not impacted by the floods, indicating that potential buyers should feel reassured about the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Several comments highlight the impressive maintenance and condition of the 2017 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara, with @hydraautomotive noting that it has an impeccable service history and has been regularly maintained. Enthusiasts like @Thwenis express their admiration for the vehicle, calling it their dream Jeep and indicating strong enthusiasm for its vibrant color, which @hydraautomotive confirms is the original "Chief Blue." Potential buyers are reassured by the descriptions of quality modifications including a lift kit and an aftermarket sound system, as well as the fact that the hardtop is being carefully reinstalled before shipping.
Neutral: The comments reflect interest in the specifics of the vehicle, such as @johnny0043's question about whether the blue color is a wrap or the original paint, to which @hydraautomotive clarifies it is indeed the original color. @JamieDufour inquires about storage options for the hardtop parts, indicating a practical consideration for potential buyers. Throughout the exchanges, @hydraautomotive maintains a professional tone, offering updates and inviting further questions, which portrays an open communication channel.
Negative: There aren't any overtly negative comments regarding the Jeep itself; however, the absence of user-generated feedback on driving performance or other concerns may suggest that some potential buyers are cautious or waiting for more details before making a decision. Also, @JamieDufour's question about onboard storage for the hardtop parts hints at possible concerns about practicality, which could be a factor for some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the car, noting its aesthetic appeal and significant historical context. @LegacyGraphicDesign highlighted that the 1958 Corvette is their favorite year, emphasizing its transition in popularity and the profitable turning point for the model. Additionally, @61DualQuad remarked that the 350 engine looks great in the vehicle, suggesting it fits seamlessly. @GreggC also referred to the car as a 'sweet looking driver,' echoing the sentiment of pride in the vehicle's appearance.
Neutral: Some comments centered around inquiries about the vehicle's specifics and features. @curtis-w questioned any modifications to the frame, to which @911r (The Seller) responded by assuring that the frame is solid and hasn't been altered, providing reassurance to potential buyers. @jturner sought clarity on the inclusion of 57 Chevy parts found in some photos, and @911r (The Seller) clarified that these parts were simply items that came with the vehicle and were in the trunk when acquired.
Negative: A few comments hinted at concerns or misunderstandings regarding the vehicle's specifications. @GreggC initially questioned the rationale behind the vehicle's 3-speed transmission, yet was corrected by @69zzcopoman, who informed him that the 3-speed was standard for 1958 Corvettes. While @lakeside-15275's inquiry about the convertible top indicated some confusion regarding the car's details, @911r (The Seller) promptly confirmed the absence of a soft top, showing the importance of clear information for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the general positive perception of the Town Car's condition, with @Big_DaddyRL expressing that it is a nice vehicle and @Tigers196884 noting its super clean status for a 21-year-old car. @mcqueens (The Seller) also reassures potential buyers that the car is ready for long-distance travel, stating it can be driven to locations like New York, Florida, or California after passing a safety check involving the brakes and suspension. Additionally, the recent maintenance including new tires, battery replacement, and an oil change has been positively acknowledged, contributing to its appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters seek clarity on the vehicle's mileage discrepancies and want confirmation regarding mechanical systems like the rear air leveling system and tire date codes. @Anthony44eldorado asks about necessary repairs and expresses interest in bidding if he receives information about what the car needs. @GotronFerret inquires about obtaining documents to verify the correct mileage at transfer. @PalmSpringsTemptations requests a cold-start video to assess potential issues with the timing chain, indicating that there are questions yet to be answered that could sway potential bids.
Negative: Concerns about the mileage discrepancy have been a significant focus, with @Big_DaddyRL questioning how such a difference could exist given the car’s condition. @Anthony44eldorado mentions needing chrome rockers and pillars, hinting at the necessity of additional work to achieve a fully satisfactory vehicle. @Tigers196884 suggests that there may have been a lack of accuracy in the car's description, while @PalmSpringsTemptations raises issues regarding whether past repairs were conducted using original parts, contributing to doubts about the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: @packardv8 appreciates the vehicle as one of the most underrated cars of its era and expresses a desire to build a custom version. @neverenoughgold shares a nostalgic connection, recalling how he bought a similar vehicle for his wife and emphasizes enjoyment of the car. @gkistler, the seller, mentions the car's well-maintained dash and shares a personal history with it, indicating that it has been cared for diligently since 1996.
Neutral: @Smilinpat comments positively about the vehicle being a nice survivor but inquires about the Carfax report, current registration status, and functionality of the electronic air suspension. @gkistler responds by confirming the inclusion of the Carfax report, clarifying registration and smog inspection details, and assures that the air suspension works properly. Some comments also reference California smog laws and requirements, indicating a general understanding among users.
Negative: @Keepit and @mike1484 point out concerns regarding California’s smog inspection laws, indicating that sellers must provide a current certificate, which has caused some confusion with @gkistler’s claims of a grace period. @Smilinpat also challenges @gkistler's statement about renewing registrations, emphasizing that expired registration incurs late fees and there is no grace period, calling for greater transparency around the vehicle's registration and smog requirements.
|
 |
Positive: @Sophie270, the seller, warmly welcomes potential buyers to the sale of her beautiful 135 Beemer, highlighting its fun driving experience, impressive gas mileage, and the convenience of a convertible top for nice weather. She emphasizes that the car is always garaged and is available to answer any questions. Additionally, she notes helpful features like the inclusion of both automatic and manual driving modes, allowing buyers to choose between fully automatic or sporty driving with paddle shifters.
Neutral: @Sophie270 mentions an oil change noted incorrectly on the Carfax report and clarifies that the brake pads are still in good condition despite the warning light on the dash persisting, as it was already inspected at a local shop. She also discusses a notice she received from BMW regarding a warranty extension for the Footwell Module, which controls dashboard warning lights, indicating next steps for potential buyers. Furthermore, she shares images of minor cosmetic dings on the car and emphasizes that these can be restored easily, ensuring transparency with prospective buyers.
Negative: @cah8t6 questions the status of the brake pads and wear sensors, expressing concerns about the persistent warning light despite their replacement. Some comments imply skepticism over the reliability of certain features, with critiques about the car's maintenance history, suggesting potential issues that could affect buyer confidence. Additionally, @george_graves raises doubts regarding some performance aspects of the vehicle, while @Darkstar0821 points out that the missing '1' from the model designation could also raise questions about the car's authenticity or history.
|
 |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the GTO's color, calling it "unreal" and a "delightful example", while @rgilson7 expressed a love for the design, noting it appears cleaner than a 69 and complimenting the nice color combination. @58Charcoal stated they loved the lines of the car and appreciated the extensive number of images provided in the auction, reflecting a pride in owning a similar model. @TheOrganizedGarage found the GTO to be "cool" and thoroughly reviewed all the 735 photos, demonstrating a strong interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: @Autogalerie-us, the seller, invited comments and questions from potential buyers and encouraged in-person inspections or virtual viewings. They emphasized the care taken in listing the car with a forthcoming detailed overview video. @PontiacNut and others engaged in discussions about the vehicle's original parts, such as hubcaps, while @Flashpix questioned the use of Tempest wheel covers instead of Rally wheels, indicating a curiosity about the car's specifications.
Negative: @NESTIUS pointed out the absence of a Ram Air hood, perhaps indicating a missed feature for enthusiasts. @georgepehanick raised concerns about a potential exhaust manifold leak heard in the detailed auction video and suggested spending more time on engine detailing to enhance the presentation. Furthermore, @Dfhodg expressed skepticism about the car's originality, questioning whether it was truly rust-free and consistently inquired about the trunk's condition.
|
 |
Positive: Comments highlighting the vehicle's quality indicate it is a 'beautiful low mile example' and 'extremely well preserved.' @ad84am appreciates its vibrant red color, while @AdamsPolishes praises its detail, suggesting that the cleaning and restoration efforts were successful. The seller, @casciomotors, reassures potential buyers that the paint shines with a deep luster and that the truck is free of leaks and paint blemishes. There's emphasis on the truck being a collector-quality example, highlighted by the vehicle being one of only 260 HMCO models built for its year, with a unique color rare in Hummers.
Neutral: Inquiries made by @Buyer92657 exhibit a careful consideration of the vehicle's condition, asking about paint blemishes and any leaks. The seller responded that there are little to no blemishes and confirmed the vehicle's good maintenance. @dlaforgia notes a need for a rear alignment on the camber, but suggests this issue may not deter collectors, indicating that the vehicle still holds strong value in the collector market. Additionally, the seller emphasized the availability of original keys, books, and tools, further assuring the vehicle’s completeness.
Negative: Concerns raised include potential past rust on the undercarriage, with @Buyer92657 referencing a previous listing showing significant issues. The seller, however, ensures that the current state of the undercarriage is sound, with no significant rust or rot, yet acknowledges that some surface rust may be present on unpainted areas. Overall, the comments reflect a mixture of commendations and cautious inquiries regarding the vehicle's history and present condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express enthusiasm and admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and elegance. @JamesThomas shared clear excitement with a simple 😍, while @Barryward felt owning a Fleetwood would be a good experience. @ajhyman simply remarked 'Nice car,' emphasizing a positive general impression. @Dollycat3 described the Fleetwood Series 75 Sedan as big, beautiful, and stylish, labeling it as elegant and opulent. @neilpierson25 noted that the first owners of the car prioritized luxury and comfort without wanting to be overly flashy, reflecting a thoughtful appreciation for the design and intent behind the vehicle.
Neutral: The seller, @Cwauto, provided detailed information about the vehicle to potential bidders, emphasizing important features and logistics. They uploaded a video showcasing the Fleetwood running smoothly and addressed inquiries about the overall length of the car, mentioning a 141" wheelbase and almost 18.6 feet in total length. Additionally, @Cwauto assured bidders of a clean title and expressed readiness to assist with transportation if the winning bidder is from out of state, indicating a focus on ensuring a smooth purchasing process for potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @rragozzino111 regarding the legal title, inquiring about the procedure to ensure they would receive it with their purchase. This highlights a possible apprehension about the clarity of the transaction. However, @Cwauto reassured that they guarantee a clean clear title along with all necessary documents, pointing towards an effort to alleviate buyer concerns. While the overall sentiment is positive, the mention of title clarity indicates the need for transparency in large transactions.
|
 |
Positive: @RayoZ appreciates the aesthetic choice of ceramic calipers painted black, praising the owner's taste. @Matt0326 commends the strong initial bid, and @shidinger calls the build nice, noting it looks great in black. @Best_Of_Show finds the car beautiful and appreciates its appeal, while @abhishekss admires the specification of the vehicle. @Boosted1 adds that they like the specs, showcasing overall enthusiasm regarding the vehicle's design and features.
Neutral: @TAC_TheApexCollection (The Seller) responds to concerns regarding electrical issues raised by @Best_Of_Show, clarifying that there have been no such problems and that the car has been meticulously maintained by the local Porsche dealership. The seller also confirms to @yellowferrari77 that the car has never been tracked and has been pampered as part of a significant collection. In response to warranty inquiries from @abhishekss, the seller confirms the expiration date and suggests that an extended warranty could be available, while also explaining the Cherokee Nation title to @Best_Of_Show and @Cargellin, clarifying its transferability.
Negative: @Best_Of_Show initially questions the car's history due to CARFAX notes indicating multiple visits to the shop, which raises concerns about the vehicle's reliability. This prompted further inquiry into the title status by @Cargellin and others, seeking assurance that there were no hidden issues related to the vehicle's maintenance. While addressed by the seller, the past mentions of electrical issues remain a point of apprehension among potential buyers, impacting their perception.
|
 |
Positive: @GenauAutoWerks highlights that the car, a 1968 Pontiac Firebird 400 Convertible, underwent comprehensive mechanical restoration recently, making it ready for enjoyable, trouble-free driving. Commenters like @redboots and @boaboyoz admire the car's aesthetics and appreciate that it doesn't require an LS swap. Many, including @Flyfishgypsy and @Sparky54, emphasize the car's beauty and the dedication of its current owner, praising the extensive restoration work and its suitability for cruising or enjoying without the worry of a show car.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a technical interest in the car, discussing details such as the engine's matching numbers and the absence of cocktail shakers, with @Joes124 providing accurate specifications. Discussions focus on historical paint colors with @dexcool4786 noting the color change from Verdero Green, a popular choice at the time, and @mdezee56 reminiscing about original features like the hood tachometer. @V8sforever appreciates the collaboration among the community members and the technical insights gained during the auction process.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters about the absence of certain components, such as the cocktail shakers noted by @V8sforever and missing dampers mentioned by @mikegerm. @ssterry points out an aesthetic issue with the orientation of a headlight, while @GogoGTO1959 humorously comments on the need to prime the carburetor before starting. Despite these critiques, the overall sentiment remains hopeful and enthusiastic about the car's potential.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its good looks and reliable nature. @dr.j64 even quoted Killer Mike enthusiastically while @Old_Merc considered it a dependable car that could go for many more miles. Additionally, @Luz_do_sol praised its original, unmolested condition, noting the timeless appeal of its exterior and interior colors along with the good performance of the engine and 4MATIC system, making it a great find.
Neutral: Several comments were focused on inquiries about the vehicle's condition and details that were not immediately clear from the listing. @quickmath suggested that the listing could benefit from additional photos, particularly of certain areas, and @kcmbat asked about specific components like the 4Matic and SLS. The seller, @Chilly95, responded promptly to these questions, confirming the working order of many systems and providing additional photos across various topics raised by potential buyers.
Negative: While there were no outright negative comments, some concerns were raised regarding certain aspects of the vehicle. @DLL58 pointed out that the wiring harness questions depend on fuel management rather than the car's year, hinting at potential issues. Moreover, @samsnj and @Imullen questioned the condition of the headliner and wiring harness, which suggests that buyers have reservations about possible hidden problems despite the vehicle's generally favorable presentation.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have expressed admiration for the vehicle, noting that it is beautiful and interesting, with @dogpwr specifically calling it a 'Beautiful Car.' @Lolaracer acknowledged that the car's age makes it easier to be imported into Canada, indicating a favorable viewpoint on its value. Furthermore, commentors such as @RSB-Scottsdale thanked the seller for adding new pictures, suggesting that the updates were well-received and appreciated by potential buyers.
Neutral: A variety of questions have been raised about the vehicle, with @dstjohn inquiring about the specifics of the entry code and production date necessary for importation into Canada. @MichaelGerdine, on the other hand, requested additional pictures of the leather on the dash, revealing an interest in the vehicle's condition. The seller, @performance_motorcar, indicated that they would look into the Carfax report and service records, showing an effort to provide information and address concerns raised by bidders.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the vehicle's history and condition. For instance, @RB16 questioned why the rear bumper and front grill had been replaced, pointing out that the Carfax did not mention any damage. In addition, @PCowell expressed uncertainty about the service history since 2023, thereby indicating a lack of trust in the vehicle's maintenance records. Moreover, @performance_motorcar noted that there was a peeling issue on the dashboard, which could potentially deter buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @Cotullaguy expressed excitement about the car, mentioning it as his first vehicle and showing enthusiasm with a straightforward "Love it." @Glwa,johnnyvett encouraged @Corybrady regarding the vehicle's proximity to them, sharing a sense of community and nostalgia. @JWHBOOMER recalled a memorable summer in 1979 where he experienced the revolutionary handling of the RX7, indicating a strong fondness for the car's performance. @jackz4 noted a good choice of tire size based on his positive experience with the same size in the past, further emphasizing the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: @BJMazda, the seller, provided a detailed history of the car, confirming it was garage-kept, driven primarily in California, and well-maintained by his father, who performed minor servicing throughout ownership. The seller highlighted that the car went through extensive refurbishment and has only driven occasionally since 2019. Meanwhile, questions arose regarding the compression test and engine mileage, indicating that such specifics about the engine were unavailable. The seller acknowledged these inquiries and responded with honest, direct communication about the vehicle's current condition and history.
Negative: @rfrankov pointed out that the vehicle is not street legal in California, raising concerns about its compliance with emissions testing, which could be a significant drawback for potential buyers. Furthermore, @repu1993 and @Magooracing inquired about compression tests and engine mileage, respectively, showing skepticism about the vehicle's performance and repair history, while @BJMazda acknowledged the lack of clarity around these records, thus leaving some doubts about the overall reliability and maintenance of the car.
|
 |
Positive: @Speedyx9 expressed that the vehicle has a lot of potential fun and excitement, referring to it as a 'hot rod' and reminiscing about the addictive power band of his childhood bike. @saddlesore commented on the beauty of the bike, recalling fond memories of owning similar models and emphasizing its desirability among Kawasaki triple collectors. @Trifiveron echoed this sentiment by praising the bike's aesthetics and the exhilarating experience of riding it at high RPMs, making it clear that there is a lot of appreciation for its design and potential performance.
Neutral: @Samuelo (The Seller) clarified that while he is unsure if the engine has been rebuilt, the bike was previously owned by someone who took great care of it and that it competed successfully in a vintage motorcycle competition. @BoneStock inquired about the inclusion of the factory airbox and owner's manual, to which the seller confirmed they are part of the sale, highlighting the completeness of the offering. @Indypacer raised questions regarding the engine status, showcasing typical buyer curiosity about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history.
Negative: @Ken_Will shared a somber personal story related to the H1, indicating the potential dangers associated with riding such powerful bikes. @spockcat noted that while the bike looks appealing, he was disappointed by the excessive background noise in the seller's videos, which detracted from the experience of hearing the bike's unique sound. Additionally, @Leaking-Oil reflected on his ownership experience and concerns about the bike's performance, suggesting that the smoke levels seem higher than he remembers, indicating a possible issue with the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Laverdude praises the restoration quality of the vehicle, expressing enthusiasm for its overall condition. @Yamalol appreciates the vehicle's perfect patina, noting that while it's sturdy, it's not so pristine that it shouldn't be used as a truck. @BoyRatty believes the truck is ideal for various tasks and values it at $25K, highlighting its utility and functionality.
Neutral: Comments from @Bpgraves (The Seller) indicate the vehicle's robust nature and its suitability as a daily driver, especially with rising fuel prices. He provides detailed information about the truck, including the condition of its parts and the mechanical work done on it, ensuring potential buyers are informed about its features like the new 22R motor and the overall maintenance it has received.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by users such as @kakinuma and @talleng2 regarding specific details about the vehicle. @kakinuma seeks clarification on the absence of smog equipment, while @talleng2 questions the condition of the seats under the covers, suggesting uncertainty about their quality. @55kempara attempts to verify details about the truck's bed length, hinting at some confusion regarding its specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @ExclusiveMotorClub (The Seller) praises the 2023 Challenger Jailbreak Widebody, highlighting its exhilarating power from the supercharged engine and the pleasurable sound of the supercharger that enhances the driving experience. The Seller encourages potential buyers to reach out with any questions during the auction, promoting a welcoming environment for bidders.
Neutral: @LivinLife7453 raises a question regarding the window sticker of the vehicle, specifically asking about the black wheels, suggesting there may be some confusion about the vehicle's specifications. Meanwhile, @jms493 points out that the wheels are not stock according to the build sheet, indicating that they differ from the original factory model, which is a factual observation about the vehicle's customizations without expressing an opinion.
Negative: There are no notably negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided text. However, the concerns raised by @jms493 about the non-stock wheels might imply a potential drawback for buyers who prefer authenticity or factory specifications.
|
 |
Positive: @kobym appreciates the aesthetic of the 1968 MGC, noting it looks nice and well cared-for, particularly liking the absence of head rests and side reflectors, which he feels gives it a 'cleaner' look. @Mr_M fondly recalls his own experience with the vehicle, highlighting it as a fun and dependable car, expressing a desire to own another if space allowed. @Mgormanvm acknowledges the extensive work and upgrades the seller has done, describing it as a nice example of the model.
Neutral: @RM9700 (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding the car’s refurbishments, clarifying the mechanical and electrical systems were either rebuilt or replaced, including the interior. They also respond to specific inquiries about the differential ratio, brake system, and repairs carried out on the castle rails, offering transparency about the vehicle’s condition and modifications made during its refurbishment. @HatchTime and @MGB6 also engage in a discussion regarding the wipers and side markers of the vehicle, providing insights based on their own knowledge of the model's history.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about the vehicle’s modifications. @mgcbrian raises uncertainties about the castle section repairs and whether additional repairs to the front floors were made, seeking confirmation from the seller. @Windjammerusn40 questions the removal of the third wiper, implying potential discrepancies in the car's original features. Overall, these inquiries suggest that some potential buyers are cautious and looking for clarity on the restoration work done on the car.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the 1979 Volvo 242 GT, with @eng_prof calling it a 'ruling' vehicle and @volvoracer9 referring to it as 'badass'. @nathan_wiegman reminisced about his family's history with Volvos, indicating a personal connection to the model. @RoundHeadlights highlighted the value of durability and quality in older vehicles, stating that this car represents the kind of lasting quality that is often overlooked in today's disposable society. Overall, many commenters appreciate not only the car itself but also the craftsmanship and nostalgic value it represents.
Neutral: The seller, @Swhiting.us, provided detailed information about the vehicle, including the replacement motor that has about 169,000 miles, as mentioned by @Ar23jer and confirmed by @MexLuna. The seller also noted the condition of the vehicle's body after spending 44 years in California and that it was not driven during winter months to avoid road salt damage. Additionally, @Swhiting.us addressed various inquiries about the vehicle's components, such as the A/C system, brakes, and tire condition, indicating he has kept meticulous track of the car's maintenance and repairs performed by both himself and professional mechanics.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the replacement engine by @schigh, who questioned why it was not rebuilt or refurbished before installation. There were also mentions of the need for a compression check on the older high mileage engine, with @shooker emphasizing that the previous engine had issues at a much higher mileage. Despite the enthusiasm for the model, some commenters pointed out that owning an older car like this does come with uncertainties around maintenance and potential issues with high mileage parts.
|
 |
Positive: @jsdoc shared their positive experience with a similar truck, noting its durability and performance, especially praising the V6 engine. @RossHeller echoed this sentiment, commenting on the 3.4 V6 as an improvement over earlier models. @Laverdude expressed admiration for the truck's beauty and recognized it as a second chance to own it, while @ToyotaRescueFarm highlighted the truck's solid frame with reassurance to potential buyers regarding its uncoated and unpainted condition.
Neutral: @ToyotaRescueFarm responded to @NeverKnow's inquiry about the auction's prior failure, explaining that the high bidder did not follow through, and encouraged bidders to be serious. They also addressed @U0NLYLV4N0W's concerns about corrosion by stating their transparency in presenting the truck's condition. The seller has made available additional photos of the truck's underside and offered further assistance regarding shipping arrangements.
Negative: @U0NLYLV4N0W expressed dissatisfaction with the presence of corrosion beneath the truck, suggesting that sellers often tend to clean the exterior while neglecting the underside. @lunchbeast emphasized the importance of seeing the truck's true condition without paintwork obscuring potential issues. Overall, there were concerns about rust that come with the truck's age, with @ToyBoy2 trying to temper expectations by noting that surface rust takes time to become a significant problem.
|
 |
Positive: @stephenmitsv highlights the Super 3 as an exceptionally fun three-wheeled vehicle, emphasizing its character and the overwhelmingly positive reactions it garners from onlookers during drives. Unlike high-end sports cars like Ferraris and Lamborghinis, the Super 3 draws genuine curiosity and compliments, making it a standout choice for enthusiasts. @europamacchina, a Morgan Authorized Dealer, confirms the vehicle's spaciousness, noting that even taller individuals can comfortably fit inside, making it an accommodating option compared to other three-wheelers. The seller's openness to questions and willingness to share videos also fosters a positive engagement with potential buyers, who appreciate the detailed discussions about the vehicle's features.
Neutral: Several comments revolve around practical inquiries regarding the Super 3's features, such as the compatibility of yellow windshields versus clear ones and the potential for retrofitting heated seats. @rkcarman and @catdog2 raise questions that reflect genuine interest in customizing the vehicle to suit personal preferences. The discussions about seating comfort and measurements, particularly from @Rianf1 and @europamacchina, indicate that potential buyers are considering how the Super 3 compares to similar vehicles in terms of fit and comfort without expressing strong opinions either way.
Negative: Despite the positive discourse, there are hints of uncertainty regarding the practicality of owning a Morgan vehicle. @Mike-7 questions the low mileage of modern Morgans, suggesting they may be seen as expensive toys rather than vehicles meant for regular driving. This sentiment echoes concerns about whether the Super 3 is a suitable investment for someone looking for a car to enjoy over the summer or one that may sit unused for extended periods. Additionally, @catdog2's remark on retrofitting features indicates that while some buyers may desire enhancements, it may also reflect hesitance about the vehicle's basic offerings.
|
 |
Positive: Several commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its lightweight nature and excellent performance. @kansaspaul noted that the bikes are light, while @knottstilting (The Seller) emphasized the bike's manageable weight for an adventure bike at 318 pounds dry, making it pleasurable on both highways and trails. @mo8ius commented on the X bikes being among BMW's best ever, while @saddlesore appreciated the great specs and rarity of the model. The detailed walkaround video provided by @knottstilting was appreciated by @sixty6chevy, who found it to be the best he had ever seen with great information for prospective buyers.
Neutral: @just14fun asked about the seat height, which @knottstilting confirmed to be 36" in the center when the bike is level. The seller also shared updates about the vehicle, including the planned installation of new tires, which @knottstilting described as particularly suitable for both street cruising and off-road capabilities. While discussing the cosmetic aspects, @knottstilting mentioned removing original graphics for a cleaner look and noted the condition of the fender shrouds, asserting their durability and quality. Other comments such as @goldenboygarage’s interest in the bike due to family proximity to Bremerton reflect a neutral exploration of purchase possibilities rather than strong opinion.
Negative: Some concerns were raised regarding the bike's parts, particularly with the rear plastic license plate light housing which had a crack, albeit still functioning. @knottstilting acknowledged this issue but mentioned ordering a replacement. Additionally, the mishap over the wrong tire size caused some inconvenience, as detailed by @knottstilting, who ultimately rectified the situation by ordering a better quality set of tires but noted the potential for the next owner to face a delay in installation. There were no overtly negative comments regarding the bike's performance or features, suggesting general satisfaction among users.
|
Vortec-Powered 1977 International Harvester Super Scout II 4×4
G0052GGD36875
Lot 240403
Private Party
 |
Positive: @Emelton24 (The Seller) highlights the impressive features of the vehicle, stating that it not only has a modern power plant but also offers excellent startup and drivability. Commenters like @Painterhuyhoover applaud the unique color scheme and note that it is one of the cleanest Scouts they have seen, which adds to the vehicle's appeal. Other users such as @JasonBurgin and @tlcamg express admiration, with the latter emphasizing the quality backing of @Emelton24 as a reliable seller, indicating that potential buyers can expect a great running and looking Scout.
Neutral: @Emelton24 (The Seller) engages with various commenters, providing clarifications and answers regarding the vehicle's history and condition. The vehicle has had a recent ownership transition and was primarily used as a beach cruiser, according to @solfive. @mgus515 raises valid questions about the details of the vehicle, including potential blemishes and the condition of the hardtop, prompting @Emelton24 to confirm that while minor flaws exist, the truck remains solid overall and functional with working AC.
Negative: There are some concerns raised from the community regarding certain modifications and the vehicle's current condition. @sampeterson questions the use of steel doors on an SSII, suggesting a misalignment with the vehicle's original specifications. Additionally, @mgus515 points out the sagging headliner and peeling paint issues, indicating that there are aspects needing attention. @Emelton24 acknowledges these blemishes and the need for TLC on the hardtop, which could deter some potential buyers who prioritize pristine condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many users praised the vehicle's performance and comfort. @VET26 (The Seller) highlighted how the bike is comfortable for long rides, even with the original 40+ year seat, and noted its capability to surpass 100 mph without issue. @Beefmaster emphasized the bike's torque and smooth ride, mentioning that the rear end lifts during acceleration and there is minimal play between the gearbox and driveshaft. These comments suggest a strong appreciation for the bike's engineering and riding experience.
Neutral: A few users offered useful insights and clarifications regarding the vehicle's features. @VET26 (The Seller) answered inquiries about the different instrument cluster types and provided details about the original and replaced tank, indicating that the original has some rust and pinholes that he did not have time to fix. Additionally, users discussed modifications like the upgraded exhaust and suspension improvements that contribute to the bike’s overall performance.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns or missed opportunities regarding the bike. @Gnron questioned the design of the instrument cluster, hinting at a preference for round displays found in other versions. @VET26 (The Seller) acknowledged previous issues with the front suspension and noted his efforts to upgrade it, indicating that enhancements were necessary for better performance. There were mentions of the bike not receiving the appreciation it deserves in terms of pricing, signaling a concern among owners for the market value of this classic model.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's unique attributes and aesthetics. @rbf120 described it as having a beautiful presence while @packardv8 noted its rarity, highlighting the excitement around owning such a distinctive model. @my65cuda commended the seller for opting for a no reserve auction, suggesting this decision could benefit bidders and expressing enthusiasm as a fellow owner of a 59 Imperial Convertible. @Bill1648 marveled at the challenges of the interior's color change, exhibiting intrigue about the car's backstory and unique features, especially regarding its history as a possible Shriner vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments reflected various aspects of the vehicle without overtly positive or negative sentiments. @UGW pointed out the fascinating trim tag decoding and its potential future value based on market trends. Inquiries from @gottagetone requested detailed information about the car's condition, specifically about rust and functionality, indicating a cautious interest in learning more about the vehicle's state. @Tatraman mentioned a link to imagery from a past concours event related to the car, which could amplify its historical significance for interested buyers.
Negative: On the flip side, some comments expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and modifications. @phil_from_France pointed out a possible inconsistency in the aesthetics of the vehicle's interior and dashboard, while @Mordizzle made a light-hearted remark about the steering wheel design. There was also noted disappointment from @rbf120 regarding the absence of the original Persian Pink interior, which some considered a loss to the car's authenticity. Overall, there are hints of skepticism about the vehicle's current state and modifications, leading to debates about its restoration prospects.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are excited about the 2010 BMW M6 Convertible, praising its unique V10 engine and sound. @TDF_Blues highlights the impressive sound of the BMW V10, while @gs4106 notes the rarity of these vehicles, commenting that they rarely see such convertibles. @clawson9 expresses enthusiasm and predicts the auction price climbing to $70,000, indicating a strong interest in the car's market value. @Jlnike enthusiastically shares their driving experience, reinforcing the appeal of the M6 with its exhilarating performance and exhaust note, especially with the top down.
Neutral: Several comments reflect a general curiosity and admiration for the M6. @fifeimages acknowledges the swift escalation in interest about the vehicle, while @hluthijr compliments a driving video associated with the car. The seller, @1600veloce, actively engages with potential buyers, offering detailed information about their services, including shipping logistics and trade-in assistance, which adds a professional dimension to the conversation. There is also discussion about the limited production of this vehicle, which adds to its allure among enthusiasts.
Negative: On the flip side, there are skeptics regarding the car's market value and overall condition. @shady908 mentions having owned a similar car and questions the inflated price, suggesting that the current market may be in a bubble. They express concerns over the vehicle's past damages not being fully disclosed, implying that the historical issues might affect the resale value. @RavenM shares a preference for the coupe version of the M6, suggesting disappointment that the convertible is not more sought after. This indicates that while the M6 has a passionate following, there are also doubts about its valuation and condition.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the rarity of the vehicle, particularly its designation as one of only 34 Final Edition ACRs, with @supercarjeepguy emphatically confirming its legitimacy in the Final Edition Registry. @2002viper, the seller, passionately reassures potential buyers of the car's authenticity, mentioning significant features such as the ACR package and low mileage. Others like @KCDenali and @exoticworld applauded the car's pristine condition, likening it to a vehicle straight off the showroom floor, with comments expressing a combination of admiration and excitement about its auction and bidding activity.
Neutral: The discussion included questions regarding the vehicle's mileage, with multiple users including @Amino_Acid_ and @C3Lee expressing confusion about the numbers reported. There was a mixture of expertise demonstrated, with @DanTheMan86 asking technical questions about the car's specifics, while @meandmyredferrari openly admitted to misinformation about the ACR designation. Overall, the conversation provided a balanced range of technical interest along with personal anecdotes and experiences related to Viper ownership, enriching the dialogue surrounding the vehicle's significance.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the vehicle's authenticity and condition. @meandmyredferrari initially flagged the vehicle as potentially misrepresented, leading to a defensive response from @2002viper. Additionally, @C3Lee questioned the car's ride height, implying there might have been adjustments made, while @98-99Viperenvy criticized the knowledge displayed by some commenters regarding the car and its history. While the overall tone was largely supportive, a few remarks indicated doubts and concerns, particularly surrounding mileage discrepancies and the vehicle's appearance.
|
 |
Positive: @delaner describes the Tiga SC85 S2 as a 'cool little car' with a design that emphasizes purity and performance, noting its aluminum monocoque chassis and solid Hewland transmission. He lauds it as a proper race car that dominated its class due to its lightweight and nimble handling, highlighting the impressive collection of documentation including logbooks and technical drawings that come with it. @delaner expresses excitement over the car's potential for vintage racing and track days, suggesting that it offers a reliable and fun experience, while also commenting on its value when compared to other similar vehicles.
Neutral: @KaiM (The Seller) provides relevant information regarding the car, answering inquiries about the driver height in the Willow Springs photo and the condition of the fuel cell. He mentions that the fuel cell's condition is good but does not know its age, while he clarifies that the current nose on the car is the only one available. He also addresses @AirBoss's inquiry about the footbox dimensions and confirms that a size 12 foot operates the pedals without issues, although he does not have the exact measurements.
Negative: @AirBoss raises concerns about the footbox dimensions and the potential difficulty of fitting long legs through the bulkhead, indicating that the current setup may not accommodate larger drivers well. He implies that the car's modifications might not allow it to pass technical inspections, hinting at issues related to competitive racing rules. Overall, the comments reflect a level of uncertainty regarding the car's fit for taller drivers and its readiness for racing conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @CadillacBob1968 shares fond memories of owning both a convertible and a coupe version of the vehicle, appreciating its comfort and recommending the replacement of bumper filler panels for aesthetic improvement. @TonyLeogrande, the seller, describes the car as a rare find from 1985, emphasizing its desirability as GM's highest-priced model of the year. He expresses confidence in the car's condition and has made several upgrades to enhance its appeal, assuring potential bidders that they are making a wise choice.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @loverofwings and @corvairwild, engage with @TonyLeogrande, asking questions about the car's repaint history and sharing thoughts on classic cars in general. @corvairwild recalls experience with similar models, highlighting their fuel efficiency but also pointing out potential issues such as underpowering and reliability concerns. @TonyLeogrande responds to these inquiries, providing insights about the vehicle's historical upgrades and affirming its current reliability based on maintenance records.
Negative: @corvairwild expresses skepticism regarding the performance of classic Cadillac Eldorados, noting that earlier models faced reliability issues and were underpowered. @1965eldo questions the seller about the short ownership period, implying a concern that may be perceived as a red flag. @TonyLeogrande clarifies his reasons for selling, detailing his personal circumstances and the steps he has taken to improve the car, but does not fully mitigate concerns regarding the vehicle's past.
|
 |
Positive: @goodfire14 expressed curiosity about the engine replacement, showing interest in the vehicle's performance and how it runs. @halfthrottle suggested that the vehicle might attract more bidders if it were listed in the "No Reserve" category, indicating a belief that this listing could generate more buyer interest and enthusiasm.
Neutral: @OldVelasco asked about who built the vehicle and the year it was completed, showing basic interest in its history. @goodfire14 inquired about the engine replacement's mileage, suggesting a moderate level of interest in the vehicle's specifications. @Ifthatsit followed up on previous questions, indicating ongoing engagement with the vehicle's details.
Negative: @Camper noted that the vehicle looks a little shabby, which implies concerns about its aesthetic condition. @C5pilot raised significant concerns about pictures 122 and 123 showing rust and separation of the pan and frame, highlighting potential extensive repairs needed that might deter buyers. @Ifthatsit also pointed out the extensive floor pan rust on both sides and questioned the alignment of the hood, indicating potential structural issues that could affect the vehicle's integrity.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments praise the vehicle, highlighting its beauty and elegance. @Farfegnugin remarked on the car being 'beautiful' and well-presented in photographs. @CraZ8 shared positive personal experience, describing his previous ownership as comfortable, luxurious, and deceptively quick, emphasizing the convenience brought by exceptional range and fast charging. @buellwinkle added to the compliments by noting that the car's design elegance is outstanding, while @randomtime stated that his new Lucid Air Pure has become his favorite daily driver, suggesting that other buyers will also love the Grand Touring model.
Neutral: Several comments reflect inquiries and neutral observations about the vehicle's specifications and condition. @Jp2319 asked about the electric motor range and battery health, while @oldsouth and @gandrews22442222 made inquiries about warranty details, maintenance records, and features like the frunk function. The Seller, @originalblackplate, provided detailed responses, explaining warranty coverage, car features, and upgrading hardware for enhanced user experience. There was also a discussion about the vehicle's charging capabilities and comparisons with Tesla stations, which provided additional information without particularly positive or negative implications.
Negative: Some criticisms and concerns emerged in the comments. @oldsouth noted the rapid tire wear, mentioning that two sets were needed within 17,000 miles, which could be a concern for potential buyers. @Jp2319's inquiry into battery life and subsequent comments hinted at uncertainty regarding the longevity of battery systems. Additionally, @originalblackplate acknowledged a minor factory paint flaw, which, while not significant, indicated the presence of imperfections. @oldsouth also raised questions about the missing air deflector in front of the driver’s side tire, indicating oversight in the vehicle's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @CRUSH comments on the vehicle highlighting its uniqueness as an original owner truck with complete documentation, expressing enthusiasm and wishing the seller good luck. Additionally, @tswiggum1 (The Seller) emphasizes the pristine condition of the 2001 Dodge Ram 1500, describing it as an "absolute time capsule" and showcasing the care the original owner took in maintaining it. The truck's low mileage of 39,834 and its successful inspection at the Wisconsin DOT reflect its excellent upkeep, further enhancing its appeal.
Neutral: @tswiggum1 (The Seller) provides detailed information regarding the vehicle's history, mentioning that it was custom ordered with the right options from Schmidt Motors, now Sleepy Hollow Dodge Chrysler Jeep. The seller notes the significance of the original owner's decision to trade in the vehicle and points out the authenticity of documentation, including the window sticker listing the owner's name. They encourage potential buyers to reach out with questions and express their willingness to provide additional information, such as tire date codes, as part of their first listing on BAT.
Negative: There are no negative comments provided regarding the vehicle's condition or history. The seller's description does not indicate any issues beyond standard maintenance needs, such as wiper blades and an oil change, suggesting a generally positive perception of the truck's state.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its pristine condition and attractive aesthetics. @racerboy221 expressed interest in seeing the 4Runner in person, while @switchon4go highlighted its cleanliness, suggesting it could win a 'cleanest spare tire' award. @goldenbear53 called it one of the cleanest 4Runners seen online, and @Dawnpatrol450 noted the vehicle's impressive details and AZ frame, further emphasizing its almost new condition.
Neutral: Several comments requested more information about vehicle maintenance and service history. @Haydenkink asked about various service records, including suspension and brake maintenance. Additionally, @Elementnomore sought clarification on any minor cosmetic flaws and suggested posting a cold start video, indicating a slight concern for thoroughness in the vehicle's representation.
Negative: While the feedback was overwhelmingly positive, there were minor concerns raised by some commenters. @TGwjacod-akota inquired about the rear window's operation and whether the AC fluid had been upgraded, showing an awareness of typical issues in older models. Overall, however, these negative aspects were overshadowed by the vehicle's strong appeal and favorable comments.
|
73k-Kilometer, Japanese-Market 1998 Mercedes-Benz E320 Avantgarde 4MATIC Wagon
WDB2102821X014479
Lot 240407
Private Party
 |
Positive: Many commenters are expressing admiration for the vehicle, particularly its unique Viola Metallic color and the overall aesthetics of the E320 model. @Strakes excitedly remarks on the car's appeal, while @Dollycat3 notes the gorgeous combination of the striking color and black leather upholstery. @UncleFred1 highlights the attention-grabbing nature of the car, and @702e30girl appreciates the vehicle's beauty and rarity. Overall, the comments reflect a strong appreciation for the car's design and condition, with fans referring to it as potentially an S-tier and 'sexy cool' option.
Neutral: Several users are discussing the vehicle's features and condition in a balanced manner. @BidNerds (The Seller) provides extensive details about the E320 Avantgarde's specifications, including its rare exterior paint and inclusion of advanced options like Xenon headlights and 4Matic all-wheel drive. Commenters such as @JWBHole and @McDeeb query about potential rust issues and the originality of the paint, indicating that while there are visible concerns, the car has been maintained well for its age. Others such as @ski.dive clarify regulations regarding California smog laws related to out-of-state vehicles, highlighting the importance of understanding the legal requirements for potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the car's condition and history are also prevalent among the comments. @JWBHole mentions the presence of orange peel in the paint and inquires about any repainting, suggesting that there could be some underlying issues. Commenters like @flaviaman question the presence of advertised features such as Parktronic sensors, indicating these may not be present on this model. Additionally, @nucleonic raises queries about unclear dashboard elements, while @McDeeb acknowledges that there might be minor rust repairs needed near the rear window. These comments reveal some skepticism regarding the car's advertised quality and history.
|
 |
Positive: @Noah17 (The Seller) expresses enthusiasm for the Panamera 4, describing it as a dream car that has been an amazing experience for him over the past month. He highlights the vehicle's pristine condition, noting that many people believe he purchased it new. He is excited to pass it on to another enthusiast who can truly enjoy it.
Neutral: @RoadKingMike acknowledges @Noah17's acquisition of the vehicle, suggesting that while it appears to be a quick flip, there is nothing wrong with that approach. He expresses curiosity about the car's lifespan in @Noah17's ownership but also affirms his intention to bid on the vehicle, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @ZMCD raises a question about the vehicle's specifications, indicating that there might be a discrepancy regarding whether this is a all-wheel drive or rear-wheel-drive model. This concern is acknowledged and clarified by the seller and the Bring a Trailer community.
Negative: @Tobyallen comments critically about the engine compartment of the Panamera 4, implying that it lacks appeal with its plastic covers, suggesting that it might not be designed with the same passion as some might expect from a luxury vehicle. There are also concerns raised regarding @Noah17's brief ownership of the vehicle, which some viewers perceive as indicative of potential underlying issues or questioning the car's value.
|
 |
Positive: @Premierautofl is enthusiastic about offering the 911 Turbo coupe on BaT with no reserve, emphasizing their commitment to answering questions and assisting with transportation for potential bidders. @JEllis praises the car as a nice example of a Techart kitted 996TT, indicating the vehicle's desirable modifications and appeal among car enthusiasts.
Neutral: @Leonia and @capnpete15 both inquire about the quick turnaround of the sale, expressing curiosity about what led to the decision to sell the car after a relatively short period since its last auction. @mikesport22 and @uscmas412 raise concerns regarding the vehicle's mileage and the accuracy of its title information, seeking clarification from the seller regarding these important details.
Negative: @k2allen questions the seller about the reason for the previous owner's sale, highlighting skepticism about the car's history and suggesting that the rapid resale could be problematic. @Camerons requests additional information about the "Not Actual Mileage Title Issued" notation, which may indicate potential issues surrounding the vehicle's mileage, adding to the unease about its condition.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional build quality and impressive performance metrics. @Calamari_Jujutsu notes it as part of the best generation of the Skyline, labeling it "Godzilla" for its ferocity. @ShiroTheHiro applauds the modifications, celebrating the 714hp output, while @mark4ton reminisces about the nostalgia associated with the R32, referring to it as an absolute beast. The consensus is clear: this car has not only the looks but the power to thrill, with mentions of quality parts and a tasteful build echoed by @dreidel and @Gryph8n.
Neutral: Several comments provide context about the vehicle's history and modifications. @ForeverCar details the work put into the car after acquisition, including over $32k spent to enhance its enjoyment and performance. Comments also discuss the changes made for comfort and practicality, such as swapping the original seats and adjusting the driveshaft to minimize vibrations, which @ForeverCar attributes to the car's usability. This mix of personal preference and technical adjustment shares insights into what it’s like to own the car, capturing both the excitement and challenges of maintaining a classic vehicle.
Negative: Some concerns arise regarding the condition and modifications of the vehicle. @mjamestaylor questions the choice of the driveshaft, hinting at potential issues with vibration if it was not properly balanced. @CL80 expresses apprehension about the potential additional costs that can come with owning a classic car, fearing that further expenses could arise after purchase. These comments reflect a cautious perspective amidst the excitement, emphasizing the complexities involved in retrofitting and maintaining a high-performance car.
|
 |
Positive: @carchasers provides an enthusiastic overview of the 2003 Chevy S10, emphasizing its status as a classic, full-frame truck that is increasingly rare in today's market. They highlight the vehicle's impressive fuel economy, low maintenance costs, and robust aftermarket support, underscoring their personal appreciation for the model. The seller mentions the truck's overall cleanliness and assures potential buyers of its quality by offering nearly 400 detailed photos and three videos for review.
Neutral: @carchasers assures @ericdl33 that the vehicle comes with two keys and commits to looking into shipping costs. They also clarify the status of the exhaust system, noting that there are no leaks or significant issues, while acknowledging some minor pinholes at the end of the tailpipe. The seller attempts to provide transparency regarding the truck's condition, showing readiness to address concerns from potential buyers.
Negative: @ericdl33 raises practical concerns regarding the condition of the exhaust system, particularly referencing a notable picture that indicates potential deterioration. Although the seller reassures that it doesn't appear to be a major issue, @ericdl33 still wants more details on the cost of fixing it, highlighting that issues, no matter how minor, can be a deterrent for buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @DKMZ06 reminisced about driving a 1974 Monte Carlo and shared fond memories of carefree adventures in a similar vehicle, expressing a sense of nostalgia as these cars are rarely seen today. @Dollycat3 described the vehicle as a beautiful original Monte Carlo, encouraging potential buyers to fix necessary issues and enjoy the car. @E.L.Cord appreciated the car's long doors and original condition, highlighting the simplicity of manual windows that come with fewer repairs.
Neutral: @pghpainter raised concerns about potential rust issues and the quality of the paint job on the particular Monte Carlo, while @frankfau inquired about the operational status of the air conditioning system. @carfoollane noted the absence of a build sheet or original window sticker, speculating about modifications made to the car over time, which does not diminish its appeal to collectors.
Negative: Several comments hinted at drawbacks, such as @mcqueens acknowledging a delay in AC repairs and the blower motor's non-functionality, yet reassuring that the AC would be operational for the new owner. @carfoollane criticized the inclusion of a misleading road test that featured a different Monte Carlo, questioning its relevance. Additionally, there were underlying sentiments of loss and regrets about memories tied to these vehicles, as expressed by @Hoppy18 recalling a harrowing yet nostalgic road trip, marked by a bittersweet remembrance of a lost friend.
|
 |
Positive: @TechnoTurbo (The Seller) expresses clear confidence in the bike's performance, stating that everything works perfectly and it has never been crashed or raced. He fondly recalls riding the bike both in Italy and around the USA, emphasizing it as his pride and joy. He assures potential buyers that all original manuals and tools are included, providing a sense of completeness and care for the vehicle. Additionally, he mentions the inclusion of factory updates and even a complimentary black tank protector, all of which suggest a well-maintained product.
Neutral: Several participants in the discussion share practical concerns about the bike's maintenance and readiness for long trips. @Norton919 specifically inquires about the bike's condition for a lengthy ride, while @Lingogringo brings up the need for potential upcoming maintenance, including Desmo service and timing belt replacements. @TechnoTurbo addresses these concerns by detailing past services, stating that a minor service was performed, and can provide more information about the bike's maintenance schedule, indicating ongoing transparency throughout the conversation.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle are primarily linked to its aging components, particularly the tires and overdue services. @Lingogringo questions the bike's overall maintenance history, indicating a need for service updates that may be essential due to their time-based nature rather than mileage alone. This raises some flags regarding the bike's readiness for new owners who might not be aware of the need to catch up on some maintenance tasks. Furthermore, @TechnoTurbo also notes that the tires are from before Covid, suggesting that they may require replacement soon, potentially leaving new riders with an extra expense.
|
 |
Positive: @MontanaBroncos expresses enthusiasm for the classic two-tone 79 Bronco and suggests returning the seats to their original design as an easy upgrade, while @Anthonyma highlights its family-owned history and describes it as stunning. Both @Todd_Z. and @boaboyoz are impressed by its aesthetics, with @Todd_Z. admiring the aged American Racing AR23 wheels and @boaboyoz calling it dynamite. @36truck supports the notion that this year is the best for Broncos, complementing the color choice. @Zimmsrods (The Seller) provides insights into the vehicle's quality, praising its rust-free condition and maintainability, stating that it runs and drives as expected without extensive modifications. Several other commenters, like @BlueCT and @BaerBronco, echo this sentiment, noting the classic appeal and head-turning looks of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Zimmsrods (The Seller) engages with potential buyers by providing additional information such as restoration details and answering queries. For example, @britton9d inquires about the condition of the top and gaskets, to which @Zimmsrods responds affirmatively. @Olesparky raises questions regarding any work done on the transfer case, which @Zimmsrods clarifies that seals and fluids were addressed during restoration, confirming leak-free performance. Other commenters like @cptndav12 also request additional photos of the undercarriage, showcasing a desire for more transparency about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: While the overall feedback is positive, a few commenters bring forward concerns. @Mikey911 asks for documentation regarding the frame-off restoration, indicating a need for evidence of the claimed work. @Olesparky and @cptndav12 both express a desire for more specific mechanical details and images, which suggests a cautious approach from potential buyers. @BlueCT humorously notes the importance of a personal touch, like a Hula girl on the dashboard, illustrating that while the overall reception is good, some aspects could be seen as lacking or needing more detail.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have praised the vehicle, particularly its stunning two-tone color scheme of India Ivory and Cashmere Blue. @boaboyoz and @Hawksmith expressed admiration, describing it as a 'thing of beauty' and 'absolutely Beautiful' respectively. Additionally, @Bordeaux highlighted the presentation of the Bel Air, appreciating the accurate body tag and engine suffix, and stating that it reflects how a Chevrolet should be marketed. Many participants in the discussion are enthusiastic about the car's fresh showroom appearance, emphasizing the high standard of the listings from @1600veloce, the seller.
Neutral: @1600veloce outlined their credentials as a seller on Bring a Trailer, providing assurance about the quality of their listings and encouraging potential buyers to reach out for logistics and viewing appointments. There was a mention of an optional live video walkthrough for the vehicle, which allows for a more comprehensive view, but there was also a note of a limited viewing window due to the auction ending, which @broodie pointed out. Additionally, queries regarding some specifics, like wheel sizes and light indicators were raised, indicating a common interest in the technical aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the auction scheduling, particularly by @broodie, who noted that the viewing time before the auction ended was insufficient. Similarly, @tmakarius expressed frustration about difficulties in setting up an appointment to view the vehicle and not receiving a timely response, suggesting there may be issues with communication from the seller's side. Another point of contention came from @nicajmar, questioning the relevance of paint metering panels on a repainted car, indicating skepticism among some potential buyers about the vehicle's originality or condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has been described by @jfetters777 (The Seller) as fully operational, with no known quirks, and an air conditioning system that functions effectively. Additionally, the seller expresses readiness to accommodate the buyer by offering to pick them up at the ABQ airport, showcasing a commitment to customer service and convenience. Furthermore, the seller assures that the vehicle is reliable enough for a cross-country trip, which instills confidence in potential buyers regarding its performance and dependability.
Neutral: @WyattGuthrie inquired about various operational aspects of the vehicle, including whether everything works, if the AC is cold, and if there are any quirks potential buyers should be aware of. Their questions indicate an interest in ensuring the vehicle meets their expectations before committing to a purchase. The inquiries are straightforward and reflect a standard due diligence process for prospective buyers, seeking reassurance on the vehicle's condition and reliability.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: @Wayne962 expressed that the fun-per-dollar ratio for this vehicle is high, suggesting it offers great enjoyment relative to its cost. @oldracer fondly remembers watching @Kurt race this very car in Southern California, recognizing it as a highly competitive and well-maintained vehicle. The author mentions that finding a Formula Junior of this era in original condition is a significant find, highlighting the car's historical importance and competitiveness among renowned drivers.
Neutral: @racingreen, the seller, noted that the Dolphin International cockpit is spacious enough for someone around @TigerBob86's size, with modifications possible for comfort. The seller provided interesting background on the vehicle's design, specifically mentioning that it was influenced by Dan Gurney and detailing its racing history, including multiple wins. There is mention of the car's known ownership and racing history, with the seller informing @custersmustache that although no logbooks exist for the vehicle, evidence and photographs can help provide authenticity.
Negative: @custersmustache inquired about the availability of logbooks or official documentation, highlighting a concern regarding the car's history. @StressCraxx clarified that logbooks weren't issued until 1972, indicating a limitation in record-keeping for such vintage vehicles. Meanwhile, @FerrariBoy35 wished the seller better luck than he had, implying past challenges faced during restoration, which may suggest potential complications in the current sale.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the 2005 GMC Denali for its excellent performance and maintenance history. @3pointsgarage, the seller, stated that the vehicle was garage kept for most of its life and not driven in salty conditions, resulting in no rust. Users commented on the vehicle's strong engine and the fact that the truck is in remarkably clean condition, with @cdwatnsu noting that the tires received compliments at the store. Additionally, @Crj2031 mentioned that the Autoride suspension works properly, which indicates that the vehicle is well-maintained and reliable.
Neutral: There were also neutral observations about the Denali's features and specifications. @Specialk2002 pointed out the absence of a sunroof for Denali models, but @3pointsgarage clarified that his vehicle does indeed have a sunroof that operates well. Some discussion arose regarding the engine's starting time. @cdwatnsu shared a personal experience with a similar issue, suggesting that perhaps the fuel pump needed replacing, which @3pointsgarage acknowledged could be a common concern for older GMT800 models. Overall, the seller remained transparent about the vehicle's condition and features.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised about minor issues with the Denali. @cdwatnsu asked about the engine's slow starting, to which @3pointsgarage admitted that the truck occasionally takes longer to start due to sitting for long periods. He suggested that a fuel pump change could be beneficial for someone intending to use the vehicle as a daily driver. Additionally, @Reacher1023 inquired about a pit in the windshield, revealing that there are some imperfections that potential buyers should consider. Despite these issues, the overall sentiment remained positive about the vehicle's quality.
|
 |
Positive: @Nimrod expresses admiration by calling the vehicle gorgeous and questioning how one can own it without driving it, mentioning the desire to hear the engine rumble. @ruracing1 also praises the beauty of the vehicle, sharing their extensive experience in racing and suggesting potential uses for the car such as vintage races or modifications to make it streetable. @alanm96ss reflects on the historical aspect of the vehicle, highlighting the contrast of its previous use as a racing car and describing it as an 'absolute death trap' yet 'awesome.'
Neutral: @boyleed shares uncertainty about what to do with the vehicle but expresses liking it, and @2004Avanti inquires about practical details like the type of fuel system and availability of spare gears, demonstrating curiosity without strong emotional positioning. @Cs5ski, the seller, provides information confirming that the chassis and body were built by recognized individuals and clarifies that the engine was pickled and the roll cage is welded, addressing potential concerns from interested buyers.
Negative: There are no distinctly negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided comments. However, @ruracing1 does imply that starting the vehicle may be a challenge, since it lacks certain modern conveniences like a starter, clutch, or transmission, which could deter some potential buyers. Additionally, @merlynbill raises a question about the removable nature of the roll cage, indicating a possible concern about the vehicle's design or functionality.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle being offered is described as a super clean L322 Range Rover that has been well-maintained throughout its life. @Bad_Chadi (The Seller) notes that it has spent most of its time in states with mild winters, resulting in a great undercarriage, body, and interior condition. The seller highlights recent preventative maintenance including a vehicle inspection and the replacement of essential components like the water pump and crossover pipe, aimed at ensuring reliability for the next owner. Furthermore, the seller has included details about the tire and brake conditions, emphasizing that they have plenty of life left, which adds to the car's appeal.
Neutral: Several comments reflect varying perspectives on the auction process. @cmatatall appears to be frustrated with the bidding situation while another user, @430NYC, encourages engagement in the auction rather than critiquing others. @Stoneman99 inquires about the specifics of the coolant crossover pipe replacements, leading to an informative response from @Bad_Chadi on the choices available for the vehicle, and clearing up confusion regarding the maintenance performed. The seller discusses the bidding policies on BaT, explaining the flexibility in starting bids and tactics employed by bidders.
Negative: There are some concerns from users regarding the auction dynamics and vehicle maintenance specifics. @cmatatall's comments have been flagged as non-constructive, indicating a level of contention among bidders. @LECain requests verification on the functionality of the air suspension system,hinting at past issues he has encountered with similar models, which raises a valid concern about potential reliability problems with this feature. This indicates that while the vehicle is marketed strongly, there are lingering worries about certain aspects of its performance.
|
 |
Positive: @supertek commented that the vehicle is beautiful, highlighting its visual appeal. Enthusiasts like @F1Jim64 expressed excitement over the unique look of the Bronco, appreciating its characteristics as a lifted uncut model. Additionally, @Lugosbronco, the seller, mentioned the vehicle's excellent condition and careful maintenance, inviting buyers not to miss out on such a great opportunity.
Neutral: Comments from users like @Kern911 inquired about additional details, such as the availability of Spanish instruction booklets, to which @Lugosbronco replied, noting the original manuals and availability of assistance in Spanish. @BigWings and others asked about specifics like lift height and engine modifications, indicating interest in knowing more about the vehicle's features and functionality. The seller provided clarifications about the lift being a 1.25 inch suspension lift without body lift and the engine being rebuilt with quality components, focusing on reliability and performance rather than drastic modifications.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @john88822 regarding low oil pressure readings on the cold start video, and questions about the accuracy of the dashboard gauge. In response, @Lugosbronco assured that the engine was rebuilt and oil pressure was verified as working correctly. @bdnscks expressed doubt about the vehicle's stance, describing it as looking off, while @Johnnycab reinforced this criticism, questioning the high rear end setup. @Coolride65 pointed out discrepancies in the vehicle's body, suggesting it might not meet factory specifications due to replacement panels, which @Lugosbronco acknowledged.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its allure and nostalgic value. @Sparrownaut remarked that the absence of a reserve makes it tempting for ordinary enthusiasts to experience an iconic car like the 917, while others like @lightningbrett and @Hulk2000 fondly recalled experiences with similar vehicles. @Searle804 emphasized the fun aspect of upgrading the car with aftermarket performance parts, suggesting it could be a "spicy driver," which was echoed by @Hulk2000 who also saw potential modifications, indicating a supportive enthusiasm for enhancing the vehicle.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical aspects and practical considerations regarding the vehicle, particularly concerning comfort and performance. @lightningbrett and @brakeservo mentioned discomfort with the seating, illustrated by the humorous suggestion that getting in and out could make for a YouTube video. @SullivanAutoHouse (The Seller) addressed various inquiries, such as the need for adjustments to the vehicle's body for better fitment and the installation of an external oil cooler to improve engine temperatures, while maintaining transparency about vehicle modifications.
Negative: Critiques about the vehicle's safety and structural integrity were prevalent among the comments. @Hulk2000 noted concerns about the car's ability to withstand collision impacts, questioning its fiberglass body and vintage VW Beetle pan. @sliproc and @Fleche_dOr raised similar points about crash worthiness, reaffirming that this vehicle may not be suitable for those prioritizing safety. Additionally, @Bob_C highlighted potential overheating issues due to the lack of proper engine compartment sealing, warning prospective buyers to address necessary modifications before considering a purchase.
|
 |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy expressed admiration for the vehicle by noting that a 175k mile N54 engine is very impressive. The overall consensus seems to be that the car presents well and drives excellently for its age and mileage, with users acknowledging its appealing features. Comments also reflect excitement about the vehicle's quality and handling, enhancing its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: @Vwman978 provided detailed information about the car, indicating that it includes a brand new BMW clutch and a full engine rebuild, enhancing its reliability and performance. He clarified queries from other commenters regarding whether the vehicle has a tune or is still on the stock map. He also reassured listeners that all receipts and documents related to the rebuild would accompany the sale.
Negative: Some concerns were raised, such as @Phk36 asking about the service history and if the clutch had been replaced, indicating a desire for more assurance on the car's condition. Additionally, @Cykls inquired about specific issues like control surfaces peeling and the tint of the windows. These inquiries reflect a cautious approach from potential buyers regarding the car's upkeep and overall presentation.
|
 |
Positive: @Nvuskid describes the vehicle as a 'Beautiful car', highlighting its attractive appearance and overall quality, suggesting that it is visually appealing and likely well-maintained.
Neutral: @Nvuskid mentions 'All bids and no comments so far', indicating a lack of feedback from other potential buyers regarding their opinions on the vehicle. This could imply that while interest has been shown through bids, clarity about the car's condition or features remains limited.
Negative:
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's stunning aesthetics and well-executed modifications. @Sparrownaut declared it stunning, while @cmkinney noted its cleanliness and strong selling potential. @Flying_Dutchman called it the 'best 3.8 MKII in ages' and appreciated the restored original parts and mechanical upgrades. Additionally, @Dollycat3 referred to it as a 'gorgeous, exceptional California Jaguar' and @kostasd emphasized the significant investment in the car by pointing to the detailed invoices provided, highlighting the owner's passion. @tim_t, a knowledgeable commentator, praised the tasteful specifications of the car and its modifications, suggesting the vehicle is one of the nicest examples he's seen in years.
Neutral: Several comments addressed the car's specifications and modifications without strong bias either way. @tim_t pointed out some technical features like the rack and pinion steering conversion and the upgrades to the brake system, while also recognizing that it retains some original features that enhance its visual integrity. @DaveD noted the historical context of the bonnet straps, explaining their relevance to racing cars of the past, and @2hecknback mentioned the importance of the all-syncromesh 5-speed transmission. @leftcoastclassics (The Seller) clarified details about the air conditioning system that had been previously removed to enhance cooling, addressing various technical inquiries thoughtfully.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's condition after restoration. @DaveD questioned the presence of electrical and mechanical issues despite the extensive restoration costs, particularly highlighting the missing chrome trim for the rear window. @alfaman criticized the addition of the leather bonnet straps, viewing them as an unnecessary alteration that detracts from the car's overall aesthetic. @rab-dds72 expressed doubts about the restoration expenses, mistakenly interpreting the figures and questioning the valuation of the car relative to the restoration work done. These concerns indicate that while the car is generally well-regarded, there are aspects that potential buyers should consider carefully.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed excitement over the vehicle, praising its unique V8 conversion and the overall build quality. @MiataLover47 noted that the car looks impressive and asked for driving videos, while @Gmmuscleusa voiced their appreciation for the V8 Miata setup, emphasizing the fun factor and additional power it offers. Other enthusiasts, like @rgodby, complimented the build and reiterated their enjoyment of the vehicle's power, declaring 'Love it. Great build – GLWTA!' Additionally, @HappyTime found the driving video indicative of the car's powerful performance, suggesting it’s an exhilarating experience.
Neutral: Several comments posed questions regarding the vehicle's specifications and modifications, such as its emissions compatibility and the type of rear window in the soft top. @murdershot18 was concerned about the oil leak and asked about traction with 205 tires. Other commenters, like @SilverSpeedLover, raised inquiries concerning the vehicle's title history and reasoning behind swapping from a factory turbocharged Miata to a V8. The seller, @JSTSEND, provided answers about the car's condition, modifications, and functioning features, which seem to clarify many doubts.
Negative: On the other hand, some users raised concerns about the vehicle, including @Scarlet65, who speculated why the car had only seen 300 miles since ownership, implying the driving style might be more about thrill than practical use. @murdershot18 also mentioned the potential lack of traction with the current tire size, hinting at performance limitations. Furthermore, @HappyTime humorously pointed out the risks of the car leading to legal trouble due to its high performance capabilities. Overall, these negative insights indicate a mix of consideration for the vehicle's performance alongside practical concerns.
|
 |
Positive: The 2019 Maserati Quattroporte GTS is receiving praise for its exceptional condition, specified by @scc1962 (The Seller) as a one-owner vehicle with only 8,940 original miles, maintaining a flawless exterior and an immaculate interior. @Ziallen commended the car's reliability and performance, emphasizing that both the V8 and V6 models are rare and very capable sports sedans. The seller's proactive communication regarding the smog certificate and vehicle maintenance records indicates a commitment to transparency and customer service, which potential buyers appreciate.
Neutral: Comments from @FruitAvenue and @idontlikespam reflect inquiries about the car's maintenance history, such as the condition of the brakes, tire age, and whether fluids have been flushed. @scc1962 (The Seller) has confirmed that the dealership handled maintenance, but specifics on belting or fluid replacement were not readily available. Overall, comments are focused on gathering more information about the car's service history and current condition to ease potential buyer concerns.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism regarding the vehicle's maintenance and condition. @idontlikespam raised concerns about the original tires and the necessity of routine maintenance that may have been overlooked due to the car's age rather than just its mileage. Additionally, potential questions about the car's various systems and past service records indicate uncertainty that might deter cautious buyers who are wary of hidden issues despite the vehicle's low mileage.
|
 |
Positive: @Scott68GTO appreciates the car's beauty, referring to it as a "beautiful old girl." @Thetatebaumercollection shares their positive experience with a similar model, highlighting its reliability even at 353k miles. @Xrobk818x (The Seller) expresses confidence in the vehicle's condition, describing it as "beautiful and immaculate" and indicating that it drives like brand new. @Jfisher89 compliments the car for its cleanliness and acknowledges the typical maintenance needs for an older vehicle, emphasizing that it remains a superb Cadillac in today's market. @Xrobk818x also notes that the car deserves to be preserved and is too precious to modify.
Neutral: Various commenters, including @CalYooper, ask specific questions regarding the car's maintenance and parts, like why the brakes were replaced at such low mileage and what materials were used for the sway bar bushings. @gb70 inquires about the electronic leveling control suspension, discussing the conversion to conventional shocks and the perceived changes in ride comfort. @gb70 also mentions the challenges in finding parts and securing suitable service for such an older model but is hopeful about the seller's input regarding the vehicle's original components.
Negative: Comments reflect some concern regarding the vehicle's parts and potential maintenance issues. @CalYooper indicates skepticism about the condition of components like fluid hoses and questions whether the car would handle well for a longer drive. @gb70 expresses frustration over the difficulty in sourcing parts for older Cadillac models, with experiences of high labor costs at dealerships adding to their concerns. Furthermore, @Jimbob123 cautions that switching from air suspension to conventional shocks can lead to poor handling and emphasizes the expenses involved in restoring original parts, showcasing the possible downsides of modifying classic cars.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors have positively acknowledged the vehicle's vintage appeal, noting features such as the luxurious hood ornament and the plush vinyl landau roof, with @NoHarmLookin even humorously comparing the roof's cushioning to a living room couch. Additionally, @MikeFiftyNine highlighted the value of the grille, indicating a strong market for parts. The overall sentiment is that the car makes a bold statement and has great potential, as reflected in comments from @KatManDew who believes that with a little TLC, it could become a wonderful cruiser.
Neutral: Some users raised questions about specific features and details of the car, such as @carfan1978 who inquired about the condition of the engine and the removable continental kit. Others, like @JoeD3rd, were curious about the tire codes and reliability for long trips while also wanting to confirm the functionality of the air conditioning. These comments reflect a desire for more information before making a purchasing decision, indicating that there is interest but also uncertainty regarding the vehicle's current condition.
Negative: In contrast, concerns were voiced about the car's unique engine system, with @JoeD3rd mentioning the problematic history of the 8-6-4 system. Additionally, @bringatrailer pointed out the air conditioning's failure to blow cold, which might deter some potential buyers. @Alex241 criticized the car's stance and appearance, noting that it appeared too high in the front and lacked pinstriping due to repaint needs, which could suggest that the vehicle might require additional cosmetic work before it meets certain expectations.
|
 |
Positive: @Asdspeed (The Seller) describes the Triumph Rocket 3R motorcycle as a unique and pampered ride, showcasing its low mileage of only 4400 miles. The seller promotes the bike as a remarkable engineering feat, backed by the enthusiasm from commenters like @FordFanaticBigTime, who compares it favorably to other high-performance motorcycles. @Bdmc expresses ownership pride in a similar model and praises its handling and speed, indicating a strong community admiration for the motorcycle's capabilities and design.
Neutral: @CGNtwo raises a question about the two-up seating, specifically the absence of rear foot pegs, to which @Asdspeed (The Seller) responds that he will check upon visiting the shop. @JustKip confirms the presence of the adjustable pegs, offering reassurance. Additionally, @tigerlee inquires about the correction of a service due light, and the seller assures that it will be addressed during the upcoming oil service, demonstrating an active engagement with potential buyers.
Negative: While the comments are generally positive, there are concerns reflected in @tigerlee's query about the service due light, suggesting an underlying issue with the motorcycle's service readiness. @WeirdHarold's speculative comment about transplanting the engine into an MGB may imply doubts about the bike's versatility beyond its intended design, and it hints at a potential for customization that may not align with every buyer's expectations.
|
 |
Positive: @mick59 expresses enthusiasm for the vehicle, stating 'Keep on Buggin!' which reflects a fondness for the car's charm. @1979SuperBeetleConvert (The Seller) agrees, noting that the car is fun to drive and receives a lot of positive attention, especially due to its bright yellow color and convertible nature. Additionally, @twotrunksteve praises the classic repair manual 'How to Keep Your Volkswagen Alive' as one of the best ever, highlighting the vehicle's legacy as a beloved classic.
Neutral: @TJC45 offers a practical observation regarding the seats, suggesting that they likely haven't melted but rather that the stuffing has collapsed, which is a fixable issue. @1979SuperBeetleConvert (The Seller) acknowledges this and indicates that it is indeed a simple correction. The seller also clarifies to @TTSAudi that the seat issue is not due to melting but rather a need for additional stuffing, ensuring potential buyers are informed about its condition while reassuring them about the vehicle's maintenance.
Negative: @TTSAudi expresses concern about the state of the front seats, implying that they appear melted. This comment hints at a potential problem area that may deter some buyers. However, @1979SuperBeetleConvert (The Seller) addresses this concern directly by reassuring that the car has been garaged and covered, suggesting that any issues with the seats can be managed.
|
 |
Positive: @michaelmotorcar (The Seller) presents the 2013 Mercedes-Benz E350 BlueTec diesel as an exceptional vehicle that has only clocked 61,000 miles and is described as being in pristine condition. The seller emphasizes the car's original paint and the care it has received throughout its life, instilling confidence in potential bidders. @DJL526Blue shares a personal account of their experience with the same model, noting its reliability and performance, especially the impressive torque and fuel efficiency. They recall driving it in diverse weather conditions without issues, highlighting the car's capability and durability.
Neutral: Commenters request additional information about the vehicle, with @clemente102 asking for a cold start video and details about the car's audio and various interior functions, reflecting a common inquisitiveness among potential buyers. @hotrocdoc seeks clarification regarding the transmission history, specifically referring to a discrepancy between the seller's statements and Carfax records. Overall, the interest in these details suggests that bidders want reassurance about the car's current maintenance and performance capabilities.
Negative: Concerns are raised by some commentators about common issues associated with the model, such as the necessity of DEF fluid and potential wear on specific parts like the driver's seat cushion. @DJL526Blue mentions that they had to replace the DEF tank heater under warranty, suggesting that while the vehicle is generally high-performing, it isn’t without its faults. @clemente102 expresses anxiety waiting for responses regarding inquiries about the vehicle, indicating a level of frustration that might deter potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their love for the vehicle, highlighting its unique characteristics and appealing design. @Mithril911, who hails from the same town as the car's origin, shows enthusiasm for its British heritage. @cruzahome reminisced about the car's cool factor among peers in high school, suggesting it holds a lasting charm. Furthermore, @morganplus8 praised the car for its authentic features, noting the absence of unnecessary modifications, which adds to its appeal as a classic car that remains easy to work on due to readily available parts.
Neutral: Several comments provided additional background information about the vehicle and raised practical questions regarding its registration and history. @ANCMatt noted an earlier connection to another similar MG listing, suggesting a family tradition. @pstopp inquired about the implications of the expired BC registration, hinting it might require a new safety test for road use. @ianmacp (The Seller) contributed informative responses regarding the vehicle's engine number, confirming its ability to start on its own despite a lazy starter and addressing the concerns related to the missing VIN plate.
Negative: Conversely, some remarks pointed out potential issues with the vehicle that could deter future owners. @tim_t mentioned the missing original VIN plate, questioning its impact on the car's history. @lromanosky raised doubts about how to establish the car's production year without this key identifier and questioned its reliability regarding starting. Overall, while the car has transfixed many admirers, concerns about its electrical issues and registration status could be viewed as red flags by potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters have expressed a general enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its fun and cute design. @Sparrownaut finds it fun despite initially considering it a useless item. @Swede67 sees potential for practicality, suggesting it could serve as a convenient addition to a camper for quick errands, and is tempted by the vehicle's features. @ADM6 (The Seller) highlights the vehicle's adjustable seating and charging capabilities, indicating that it can accommodate various user heights and providing reassurance about the charging duration.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers focus on the vehicle’s specifications and usability. @MajorMinor inquires about the absence of original bicycle pedals, while @ticktown asks about access to the seating area, to which @ADM6 (The Seller) responds with a forthcoming video demonstrating the vehicle's canopy. There are also curiosities about the vehicle's weight and charging time, which @ADM6 addresses, noting that it takes about 5-6 hours to charge and is significantly lighter due to lithium-ion battery use compared to the old setup.
Negative: Concerns arise around the vehicle's limitations, particularly concerning range and load capacity. @SlideRuleOne mentions that the driving distance is only 30-35 miles and the load limit is 200 lbs, which may not meet everyone's needs. @notajedi expresses hesitation at the use of standard filament bulbs for the indicator and brake lights and wishes for a longer range of 60-70 miles. Similar criticisms from @brakeservo focus on the lack of air conditioning in hot climates, prompting @ADM6 to mention the vehicle has a fan instead.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the vehicle's appearance, noting that it looks super clean inside and out. @13VT mentions that the "Electric Blue" color is particularly striking when the sun casts a low light, indicating a visually appealing feature of the vehicle. Moreover, the after-market stereo retains functional steering wheel controls, and the clutch is reported to feel perfect by @iakllc (The Seller), suggesting a well-maintained driving experience. @dreamingofmiatas receives reassurance from the seller about the Megan coilovers being suitable for daily driving, emphasizing the car's enhanced handling without compromising comfort.
Neutral: Several comments delve into the specifics of the car’s condition and features, such as @RedAggie03 inquiring about service history and noting that the coolant bottle may need replacement but ultimately considers it a clean example. @fosteram27 prompts a check of the CarFax report, which confirms existing maintenance records. @iakllc (The Seller) addresses various questions about the vehicle, clarifying the paint issues that are typical of the manufacturer, explaining the Montana title situation, and providing insights into the condition of components like the steering controls and clutch.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's overall maintenance and hidden issues surface in various comments. @Duster340 asks about oil leaks, while @Schnoz refers to potential concerns with the coolant overflow tank and trunk holes, reflecting anxiety over mechanical issues. @rituximab emphasizes missing service records and the importance of timely maintenance, pointing out that even with the car looking excellent for its mileage, there is still a lot of potential work required. This indicates a hesitation from some commenters regarding the vehicle's upkeep and long-term reliability.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received several positive remarks highlighting its unique build and aesthetic appeal. @traveler_1701 praised the color and cohesive design, though noted it may be small for them. @Wanker complimented the exhaust as a beautiful piece of art, showcasing excellent craftsmanship. @Twosaun appreciated the imaginative design on an otherwise basic Honda and expressed a desire to see more of the bike in action. Comments also reflect admiration for the paint job, specifically mentioned by @jmorris572 who noted that the finish is stunning, especially in sunlight.
Neutral: @Rolla (The Seller) shared detailed information about the bike's specifications, highlighting the use of original parts, new old stock components, and the bike's comfort at speed. They assured potential buyers of the bike's reliable start and maintenance features, such as the battery tender port. The seller also discussed design choices made to enhance the bike's aesthetic, including the decision to replace original exhausts with visually appealing ones, mentioning their hidden brackets. Additionally, they addressed queries regarding mirrors and turn signals, indicating readiness to provide further information and photos if needed.
Negative: While most feedback is positive, there are hints of concerns, particularly regarding compliance with local laws. @jmorris572 mentioned the necessity for bar end or under bar side mirrors due to Florida law, raising a potential issue about the bike's legality for street use without them. The seller acknowledged this and noted they had the mirrors but hadn't installed them yet, which might suggest a lack of readiness for compliance despite the overall high quality and craftsmanship of the bike.
|
|
|