Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
|
|
 |
Positive: @mhajeck (The Seller) shares a deep appreciation for the 1935 Ford Roadster, describing it as a 'total blast to drive' and revealing that he has enjoyed every minute of ownership. He notes the uniqueness of the vehicle, mentioning only 4,896 of these roadsters were produced in 1935, which adds to its rarity and appeal. @funkaholik also comments positively on the aesthetics of the car, highlighting its great stance and clean design with integrated bumper lights.
Neutral: @mhajeck (The Seller) answers various inquiries regarding the vehicle's features and history, providing detailed information about the roadster's specifications and confirming its original designation on the title. He discusses the rarity of the roadster configuration versus the cabriolet and acknowledges the absence of build photos or receipts, indicating he purchased it from a previous owner who had the car for a long time. Additionally, he assures potential buyers of the car's maintenance, stating it sits safely under cover and can be stored for a few weeks without issues.
Negative: Concerns are raised about some of the car's functionalities, particularly by @RacerXa who inquires about the trunk and seating situation. @mhajeck (The Seller) admits to having an intermittent issue with the fuel gauge, suggesting potential repairs that have not yet been made, and mentions that the rumble seat did not open during the photoshoot due to a probable mechanical failure. This disclosure may give potential bidders pause regarding the need for repairs.
 |
 |
Positive: @Dino886 praises the vehicle's cosmetic appeal, describing it as a sleeper with a supercharged V8, and @57charlie provides an eloquent depiction of the CTS-V Wagon's duality, likening it to wearing a tuxedo with combat boots, capturing its essence of sporting luxury. The overall sentiment reflects admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance potential, with several commenters expressing excitement about its design and functionality. @361Nick endorses its condition, noting the car has been well-maintained, while @Gm8351 encourages potential buyers, suggesting that those who bid on it will not regret the purchase.
Neutral: @Jeffkuntz comments on the surprising bid height early in the auction but notes the vehicle’s high quality aligns with its price point. Meanwhile, comments from @Driver00 clarify that the seats, which some claimed were dirty, are instead made from microfiber that may appear differently based on wear. @cognoscenti shares a nostalgic experience with a similar model that reflects well on its legacy, although he also notes a common mechanical issue related to the vehicle, which adds a practical perspective to the discussion.
Negative: @brogy054 asks about the cost to repair or replace the right rear tail light, indicating a potential concern about maintenance costs. Furthermore, @JustaGlitch expresses disappointment regarding the dirty condition of the seats, questioning why they are in such a state. @h2o_snow comments on the vehicle being the right color but notes it is the wrong choice for their personal needs, hinting at the car's limitations for some buyers, especially regarding all-wheel drive requirements.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the beauty and desirability of the car, with @Dollycat3 highlighting its original Persian Gold finish and gold leather interior, emphasizing the potential to restore it to its former glory. @boaboyoz referred to the car as a 'delightful example,' wishing the best to the seller. @California-vintage-guy, the seller, expressed enthusiasm and pride in the vehicle, sharing insights about its history and features, encouraging engagement with other classic car enthusiasts, and showcasing a commitment to maintaining major systems while acknowledging some restoration needs.
Neutral: Several comments discussed the air conditioning system's condition. @stanweiner54 asked for clarification on the AC status, while @Gregpryckman indicated that based on visible wear, the system likely hasn't functioned for a long time. The seller confirmed that all components are intact but noted the AC might need a recharge, and he emphasized a focus on ensuring the car is drivable.
Negative: There were some doubts expressed about the vehicle's state, with @DFT flagging a comment as non-constructive, indicating mixed sentiments towards the discussion. @PWSchuh raised concerns about the car's repainting history, speculating on the possibilities of poor paint jobs. Additionally, @Hoppy18 criticized the car's color choice while acknowledging its original appeal, suggesting that some may not appreciate the vehicle as much.
|
 |
Positive: @Bturbo (The Seller) has been responsive to inquiries about the vehicle, posting an interior video and confirming the car is in excellent mechanical condition without any leaks. @Barneybelle appreciates these clarifications and has remarked that the car presents well. The seller also noted the vehicle has been garage kept, has not been driven in snow or heavy rain, and has only experienced minor accidents that resulted in bumper repairs, which adds to the overall appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: There have been several requests for additional information regarding the vehicle’s maintenance history, particularly concerning the timing belt and water pump, which may not have been replaced, according to multiple comments. @Baller6 highlighted the importance of service records and other specific maintenance details. @Frankieballs and others asked for close-up pictures of the car's exterior to assess its condition, including the presence of scratches or dings on its black paint.
Negative: Concerns have been raised about the vehicle's interior condition, with @Mx7 noting the rear seat appears stained and @Genous mentioning potential issues with the dashboard. @reginacena27 expressed skepticism about the lack of timing belt service, given the vehicle’s age, which may be a dealbreaker for some potential buyers. Overall, while some find the car appealing, lingering questions about its maintenance history and interior wear may deter others from moving forward.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle reflect a sense of excitement and appreciation for its features. @DougPaul58 notes the authenticity of the Concours badging, indicating the model’s quality and attention to detail, and expresses enthusiasm over the acquisition of the longer armrests. Another positive mention is made of the vehicle’s solid underbody condition due to its history in Arizona, which @RVargo54 points out, assuring prospective buyers that it has never experienced harsh winter conditions.
Neutral: Several commenters seek further information regarding the vehicle's technical specifications and condition, especially engine-related details. @dawgeq87 and @ssterry request engine block stamp numbers and a driving video to evaluate performance and authenticity further. @RVargo54 (The Seller) responds to most inquiries, providing information about the engine and the installation status of the armrests, which helps clarify aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: There are concerns expressed regarding the vehicle’s presentation. @ssterry critiques the clarity of the provided engine block casting number, insisting it does not serve the intended purpose of verifying the vehicle's specs. Additionally, @EricDuarte comments on a perceived lack of professionalism during a demonstration, noting a panicked camera movement, which might lessen the appeal for potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many comments highlight the elegance and performance of the 2003 Jaguar XKR. @Scliffe appreciates the car's looks and notes the mechanical upgrade of its hydraulic lines, which enhances its overall value. @GM888 praises the significant improvements Jaguar made in 2003, emphasizing the power and enjoyable driving experience of the XKR, particularly its torque and seamless acceleration. @valeurosport articulates this sentiment by calling the car a blend of classic style and modern performance technology, while also noting its meticulous condition and low mileage as key selling points. Others, like @MNMMNM, echo this enthusiasm, affirming the car’s excellent condition and its potential to auction at a healthy price.
Neutral: Several commentators made inquiries or provided clarifications regarding vehicle specifications and conditions. @Kutter raised questions about the tire mounting dates compared to their manufacture dates, to which @valeurosport provided a thorough explanation about the tire's previous usage and current condition. @HelloKitty inquired about engineering updates, which @valeurosport confirmed regarding the transition to metal timing chain guides in the 2003 model. Moreover, @devoe88 requested additional photos for specific areas of concern, and @valeurosport responded positively, emphasizing transparency and thoroughness in addressing potential buyer inquiries.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns regarding specific aspects of the vehicle's condition. @Kutter pointed out a discrepancy related to the tires, which may lead potential buyers to question their quality based on the years shown on the sidewalls. Additionally, @devoe88 expressed concern about visible rust noted in photos, seeking clarification about its impact. @Scliffe also brought up the potential for tire degradation due to UV exposure, suggesting that future buyers should consider this when making their purchase decision. Despite these concerns, the seller addressed each issue, striving to assure buyers with transparency about the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of positive attention, with comments praising its beauty and condition. @asindog41 compliments the Bronco and requests additional pictures of the undercarriage focused on the brake lines. @jsloden notes that the truck appears to be very clean and rust-free, appreciating its solid condition despite the mileage. @bemrfst expresses admiration for the combination of engine and color, highlighting the features that make this Bronco appealing.
Neutral: The seller, @Smallbizconnections, details his experience with the Bronco, mentioning that he has put considerable effort into ensuring it is a reliable driver while maintaining its original character. He explains some of the work done on the truck, including resealing the transmission and refreshing the rear differential. The seller also points out the history of the vehicle and its current state, including the airbag light issue which does not affect drivability, and mentions that he will provide additional photos and videos based on community requests.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are some concerns raised. @JSpecht specifically asks about the condition of all gauges and the effectiveness of the AC, indicating a need for reassurance about the vehicle's functionality. Additionally, while @asindog41 asks for pictures to verify the undercarriage condition, it reflects a cautious interest rather than complete trust in the truck's quality. The mention of the airbag light flashing codes indicates potential issues that could be concerning for prospective buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @rpmf08 commented positively about the bike, noting that it is beautiful and has low mileage since it was bought new in 2019, stating it's not even broken in yet. @rainmarin had the chance to see the bike in person and described it as a gem, looking even better in person than in the photos. @Mgh20180 praised the bike as the best 'do-it-all' motorcycle ever built, appreciating its features and expressing a preference for its looks over the newer version. @flyinphil (The Seller) agreed with @rpmf08 about the bike being beautiful and confirmed that all its fluids were changed during its first service.
Neutral: @flyinphil (The Seller) provided insights into the bike's history, explaining why it hasn't been ridden much despite being a 2019 model, due to personal circumstances and injuries that limited his riding. He reassured potential buyers that the original tires are still in great condition, thanks to the bike being garaged and protected from UV exposure. @99duelly shared a similar experience with a GSA that suffered issues from being idle, inquiring about the fuel system which was addressed by @flyinphil when he confirmed the fuel has always been kept fresh without any problems.
Negative: @99duelly mentioned having a negative experience with his own GSA that wouldn’t start after sitting idle for 11 months, likely due to ethanol damaging the fuel system, raising concerns over similar issues with the auction bike. Though no comments indicated major faults with the seller's bike, concerns about battery longevity were raised by @Redfox1, asking whether the original battery was still in place. @sar19567 queried about the original sticker that may have been overlooked, reflecting a potential issue with documentation for the bike.
|
 |
Positive: @Ptrem commented on the vehicle being a well cared for classic JDM, while @mrtew praised its beauty. @Achman noted the car appears to be in good condition and highlighted its mechanical robustness. @sendou described the vehicle as beautiful and regarded it as a jewel with its low mileage and single-family ownership, showing appreciation for the car's unique features. @Philaz09 (The Seller) also confirmed the presence of the original factory shade for the sunroof, indicating pride in the car's original components.
Neutral: Several questions were raised regarding the vehicle's condition, including queries about the timing belt change, AC functionality, and the presence of any rust, with @WeKneeDragger and @svt24v prompting for further details. @Philaz09 (The Seller) acknowledged these inquiries and committed to checking the car thoroughly for rust and additional repairs, providing information about tire dates and service records. @sil80nissan asked about a rust spot in a photo, while @quickmx5 mentioned a discrepancy concerning the seats, to which @GC19 clarified that they are OEM seats, providing context for the discussion.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding potential misleading information in the auction, particularly by @svt24v about the inclusion of a supercharged MR2 road test, which may confuse prospective buyers about the vehicle's true nature. @Achman mentioned the risks related to soft parts degrading over time due to the car's long period of inactivity. @thebeerguy inquired about the high idle RPM observed in the start video, reflecting skepticism about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @sil80nissan and @Philaz09 (The Seller) confirmed the presence of rust in certain areas, which might discourage some potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed admiration for the Camaro's aesthetic and quality of workmanship. @mduel86 praised it as a 'Beautiful Camaro!$!$!', while @Dino886 complimented the 'Gorgeous paint choice!' and noted the effort that has been put into the build. @Lyfz2Shrt added their love for the overall look and stated that the car should bring in a significant amount of money, indicating a strong appreciation for its customization. @bcrawford1971 found inspiration for their future projects while admiring the beautiful build.
Neutral: The seller, @Challenger1969, provided detailed information about the vehicle's specifications and modifications, including its ZZ383 crate motor and various performance upgrades that have been completed. @FullSizeL72 pointed out a detail about the car's original color, but acknowledged its significance in the context of its production history. Various users suggested minor adjustments, such as adding reverse lights, which some deemed trivial but important for compliance, highlighting differing priorities among potential buyers.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle. @68CamaroSS396L78 pointed out that the car's RS style taillights do not include operational reverse lights, which could be a requirement in some states. @Prevost45 jokingly noted the absence of windshield wipers, questioning if there are accommodations for them given the Arizona climate. These concerns reflect potential issues that buyers might consider seriously while evaluating the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its impressive condition and appeal. @Ptrem noted that someone clearly cared for it, while @MattGraf expressed a willingness to pay full MSRP, reflecting high demand. @Greg_F pointed out the meticulous oil change history, suggesting an owner who took maintenance seriously. @overton praised the vehicle for its low mileage and an attractive facelift, calling it a "HONEY". The color scheme attracted positive remarks from several commenters, including @805Trueblood and @Chasboy1, indicating it stands out in a favorable way. Overall, many commenters agree that this vehicle is in remarkable condition, exemplifying quality and care in its upkeep.
Neutral: Several commenters sought additional information and clarification regarding specific aspects of the vehicle. @Ansongarage requested more undercarriage pictures, which @KingJamesII (The Seller) acknowledged and addressed. @Forrest27 was interested in viewing the vehicle in person, which was welcomed by the seller. Additionally, @martymcd asked for thorough undercarriage shots, highlighting a common concern about transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. The dialogue indicates an engagement from potential buyers seeking assurance and further details before making decisions.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about specific features or aesthetic aspects. @Czarski humorously noted damage to the e-brake handle, while @oldschoolclassics commented on the interior's poor condition, suggesting it may have suffered from extensive sun damage over time. This comment, along with observations about dashboard repairs, hints at areas that could detract from the vehicle's value. Additionally, @Thekartingzone mentioned a missing 5-speed option, which could be considered a letdown for some enthusiasts. Although the overall reception of the vehicle is positive, these issues highlight that potential buyers have lingering concerns.
|
 |
Positive: The seller, @ClassicLover92, provides a detailed account of the vehicle's condition, indicating that it has been well maintained. They affirm that there have been no issues with the rod bearings, and the car operates without any abnormal noises, particularly concerning the VANOS system. They also mention that the SMG pump and accumulator have been replaced, leading to strong shifting performance, further highlighting positive aspects of the car's service history and condition. The availability of maintenance documentation is also noted, giving potential buyers reassurance about the car's upkeep.
Neutral: @Galant asks several specific questions regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, particularly focusing on critical components such as rod bearings, the VANOS unit, the rear subframe, and the SMG system. These inquiries signal a thorough approach to understanding the car's condition before making a purchasing decision. Additionally, the seller acknowledges these questions and indicates their willingness to provide further information and documentation to assist in the buyer's evaluation process.
Negative: While @ClassicLover92 assures that there are no signs of issues with the vehicle, they admit that the rod bearings have not been replaced and that there are no documented service records from the original owner. This could concern potential buyers who may prioritize a complete maintenance history or reassurance that high-risk components have been addressed. Furthermore, the absence of reinforcement work on the rear subframe could raise red flags for some buyers, as it may be seen as a potential vulnerability in the vehicle's structural integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @Djglive described the vehicle as beautiful, complimenting its overall appearance despite pointing out an incorrect badge. @kkherman praised the car as well-preserved in a period-correct color, suggesting it remained un-driven for too long. @IMissMySaab expressed admiration for the car, noting another identical one in the area that's often seen driven, highlighting its charm.
Neutral: @piloto (The Seller) confirmed there is no rust or corrosion and offered to assist with information about importation, indicating the process is straightforward. The seller addressed inquiries regarding the emissions label and available videos of the vehicle starting and driving, making sure potential buyers are informed. While discussing mileage, @GTO400fourspeed raised concerns over the odometer reading, which was clarified later, and @bringatrailer assisted in correcting the TMU designation.
Negative: @gilbybarr pointed out common issues with the model like damage to the dash and door panels, questioning the state of the bumper caps. @5Gears worried about the import tax implications and whether previous Massachusetts residency would affect duties, while @MonsterJoe advised on the need to change headlights for California smog compliance. Additionally, @korbonits expressed skepticism regarding the car's price, questioning its value compared to other models.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters are enthusiastic about the vehicle's features and condition, expressing admiration for its aesthetics and updates. @youbugme highlighted the appeal of the new frame, rebuilt engine, and 5-speed transmission, stating, "Sign me up." Similarly, @cweiss1976 noted seeing the car in person and described it as "gorgeous!" Others, like @ncrsmaniac, recognized the seller's engagement and responsiveness, and @youbugme's comment about the car's color combination resonated with many as they shared similar tastes. The history of the car also elicited positive memories from potential buyers like @1985RR, who reminisced about his own college car.
Neutral: Some comments showed a mix of curiosity and analytical insights regarding the vehicle's specifics, mainly around its history and modifications. @Monopolychris initially sought clarity about whether the frame replacement was due to rust or collision, a viewpoint echoed by others in the thread like @JohnF1966, who noted that a replacement frame might actually be a better option than patching. Comments from @GT35065 and @youbugme shared observations about the vehicle's parts and restoration processes, aiming to clarify aspects for prospective buyers, while @CAMar (The Seller) was proactive in addressing these inquiries.
Negative: Conversely, there were concerns raised about potential issues with the car's condition, especially related to the frame and engine. For instance, @67coupe pointed out that the rear leaf spring mounting might be improperly positioned, while @Shootnride and others warned about the implications of using the wrong length bolts for safety. @Canucks00 expressed worries over oil leaks, asking for updates on whether the car leaves oil patches after being stationary. Even though the seller @CAMar attempted to alleviate these concerns by stating he had not noticed any major issues, the discussion highlighted an underlying apprehension among buyers about the car's reliability and prior history.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally admire the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, noting its beautiful color and well-preserved interior. @Dollycat3 calls it a great original one-family-owned SL, appreciating its documentation, while @ChmAz expresses enthusiasm for the color combination, labeling it a showstopper. @Crazyacres also likes the green color of the car, suggesting it will attract a special driver. Praise is consistent across several comments, indicating that the car is visually impressive and carries sentimental value, especially for the selling family.
Neutral: Discussions surround the documentation available for the vehicle, with @19Willys46 highlighting the lack of extensive maintenance records beyond the window sticker. multiple commenters urge the seller (@LauraHanser) to provide more photographs and details, especially regarding the convertible top and the vehicle's underside to address potential rust concerns. While some commenters see the added brake light as a modern safety feature that doesn't detract from the car's allure, others wish for fuller documentation to reassure prospective buyers about the vehicle's history and condition.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the car's condition, particularly its possible rust and modifications. @oortuzar71 and @giocopoco question the integrity of the paintwork and mention visible bubbling, indicating potential underlying issues. @wdbcoupe suggests that the trunk lid may have been replaced due to an accident, prompting inquiries about its history. The lack of photos of the underside also worries several commenters, as many suspect previous repairs may have been made that are not disclosed. This creates an air of caution regarding the vehicle's overall condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Sergiodeleo expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a "beautiful blacked out ride." @notajedi described it as "stunning," highlighting its aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, @TM850R praised the car's features, mentioning the spectacular Bugatti seats and wishing good luck for the auction. @TAjefe also echoed positive sentiments, believing that the vehicle's market value is on the rise.
Neutral: @dkyranakis (The Seller) provided detailed information about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history, noting that a full inspection and various services such as an oil and filter change and brake fluid flush have been completed, ensuring it drives well and looks amazing. The seller emphasized the specifications of the car, suggesting potential buyers would be very happy with it. The seller's acknowledgment of the comments suggests an open line of communication for prospective buyers.
Negative: @Sergiodeleo raised a question regarding an expensive option for the vehicle and was uncertain about its specifics, asking if a ridiculously priced option like $25k or $50k existed. @Sfortier17 responded with a note of caution, stating that to their knowledge, such an option was not available in that model, which could imply a potential misinformation issue. These comments reflect uncertainties in the details of the vehicle's luxury features.
|
2018 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500 Colorspace Studio Production Van
WD3FE8CD2JP619565
Lot 240750
Private Party
 |
Positive: @James_Bennett expresses excitement about the vehicle by commenting on the potential for every day to feel like a drive-in movie. @UncleFred1 shares their enthusiasm for the van's unique build, likening it to a Swiss Army Knife for its versatility. The comments reflect that the vehicle is well-suited to its primary function as a video production van, able to facilitate a small production studio in the back, suggesting that with a few key components, it could be highly effective for its intended use.
Neutral: @ryan_prouty (The Seller) provides detailed information about the vehicle, answering questions regarding the air conditioning system and power sources. They confirm that the van is equipped with additional batteries and inverters to support its various functionalities. Commenters such as @BlackthorneM and @captaink seek clarification on the vehicle's technical aspects, showing an interest in understanding more about its capabilities.
Negative: Some commenters express concerns about aspects of the van that are not clearly depicted in the photos, like the production equipment layout and practical features, as highlighted by @Robertjd0729's observation regarding the visibility of equipment in pictures. @cornbreadred raises additional questions about engine usage and mobile connectivity options, indicating a level of uncertainty surrounding these features. Overall, there is a desire for further clarification about the van's specifications and operational condition.
|
4,800-Mile 2007 Honda VFR800 Interceptor 25th Anniversary Special
JH2RC466X7M900660
Lot 240751
Private Party
 |
Positive: @grb1 describes the bike as a fantastic and enjoyable ride, emphasizing the musical quality of the V4 engine, especially when fitted with a Staintune exhaust. @JustaGlitch and @bemrfst both share admiration for the bike's aesthetic appeal, with @bemrfst noting it appears like new. Additionally, @ttruax1 expresses enthusiasm about the bike's thrilling ride and appearance, mentioning a recent purchase of a similar model and wishing they had waited for this one, while also highlighting the desirability of owning the owner's manual.
Neutral: @Dominooch (The Seller) clarifies that the bike has been in their collection for about a year with very few miles ridden, mainly due to time constraints despite being started periodically. @Knuckles-R-Busted shows interest in the current mileage, inquiring if it might be a misprint. @daveindian asks if any maintenance has been performed, mentioning their fond memories of a past VFR 700, indicating an ongoing interest in the bike's condition and history.
Negative: @ThoR294 shares a mixed review, stating that while the VTEC engagement was violently abrupt, a tune could potentially improve it. They also mention having sold their similar model in favor of keeping an older bike. @Seefries raises a concern about the ownership history by questioning whether the bike is being resold after zero miles ridden. @autoadict adds a humorous twist, suggesting that instead of riding, they would keep the bike as a decorative piece in their living room, implying it might be more of a collector's item than a ride.
|
 |
Positive: @denismcook praised the vehicle for its unique features, highlighting the Don’t Tread on Me flag and poncho upholstery as essential parts of its character. @cyclemikey enthusiastically described the truck as a complete package, complete with must-have accessories like air horns and a rifle rack, and noted that it is ideal for adventures. @T_McCool referred to it as a "memory machine" that stands out at events, while @CKKurtz expressed a strong appreciation for the truck, commenting on its perfection and expressing disbelief at the idea of selling it. @Ranchero65 further affirmed the seller's decision to revive this truck after years, aligning the early bidding interest as a testament to its appeal.
Neutral: @Johnnnie (The Seller) provided valuable information about the truck's features and condition, confirming that modifications like the bucket seats are feasible and that the exhaust system has been updated. He clarified concerns regarding the truck's steering and the authenticity of the patina, ensuring potential buyers about the vehicle's upkeep. He also addressed inquiries about the engine modification, explaining its history and affirming the truck's heritage and emotional value within his family. Overall, he expressed gratitude for the interest shown in the vehicle and shared anecdotes about its significance.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the truck's condition in a few comments. @cyclemikey queried the apparent looseness of the steering gear and noted the extensive use of silicone around the exhaust, suggesting possible leaks. @orttauq skeptically questioned the quality of the before picture, finding it strange and distorted, while also speculating about potential AI manipulation. There were doubts about whether the modifications were performed correctly, highlighting how these factors might impact a buyer's perception of the vehicle's reliability.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous praises for its condition and performance. @MrTGUK expressed that the car runs and drives like new with no rattles or clunks, aligning with the seller's transparency about any small flaws. @RickyJDM mentioned that Pajeros often get smiles and thumbs up, indicating their popularity and positive reception among the community. The seller, @BenzBimm, has also taken the initiative to upload detailed pictures of the car's components, showing a commitment to maintaining an honest and open auction process.
Neutral: Potential buyers have raised questions regarding registration requirements, particularly in California. @pjones80 inquired about the work involved, and @BenzBimm explained that it would require significant modifications, which could diminish the car's value. Additionally, observations about the driving experience provided insight into the car's handling, with @BenzBimm mentioning slight vibration at specific speeds, attributing this to the mud tires.
Negative: Some concerns were brought up regarding minor wear and tear on the vehicle, including little scratches and the additional work needed for California registration, which @pjones80 and @BenzBimm discussed. Additionally, @savethe3rdpedal requested further details about a specific area of the vehicle, indicating that potential buyers are scrutinizing the vehicle's condition. Overall, while the vehicle is in good shape, there are transparency efforts around its minor imperfections and potential issues that may affect buyer interest.
|
 |
Positive: @rfsewell67 mentioned that the vehicle's engine is performing reliably since its professional installation, noting it has no overheating issues and is still under warranty, which can be transferred to the next owner. @chrisheery complimented the truck, stating that it looks really nice and aligns with his taste. @tc_myers also appreciated the truck's appearance and showed interest in its details, reflecting a positive engagement with the vehicle overall.
Neutral: @richard55 expressed his fondness for the vehicle's backdated look, mentioning his curiosity about past title issues after seeing it in person in 2020. @2hecknback provided observations about the retro touches of the vehicle and highlighted the impressive glazing on the RRC, while reminiscing about Rover's design evolution. @peytonmortellite inquired about the possibility of checking the car out in person, indicating a realistic approach to the purchasing process.
Negative: @hpxxhan raised concerns about whether the vehicle would pass smog checks in California, revealing a potential hurdle for prospective buyers. @tc_myers listed several clarification questions regarding the engine installation, smog status, and warranty details, indicating a level of skepticism about the vehicle's condition and past maintenance. Overall, these comments reflect some hesitance about specific aspects of the vehicle, primarily regarding its compliance and mechanical integrity.
|
 |
Positive: @johnny0620 praised the vehicle for its impressive build, noting it as a true labor of love. @boaboyoz described the car as a 'bodacious Brighton Bel Air' and complimented its beautiful construction, wishing the seller good luck with the transaction. @Blurple highlighted the awesome two-tone separation line on the fenders, showing appreciation for the aesthetic details in the build.
Neutral: In response to inquiries about performance, @KHinrichs (The Seller) shared dyno results from the vehicle's original build, confirming impressive figures of 766 lb-ft torque and 846 hp at 5800 rpm. @standurst was curious about the choice of using a marine procharger and asked for specific dyno numbers, while @dustyjeeper expressed interest in testing the vehicle with some burnouts, indicating a social aspect of car culture.
Negative: @Old-school1963 raised concerns about the vehicle's VIN number, questioning its legitimacy and whether there was a history of theft or a reissued state VIN. Following up on their initial query, @Old-school1963 inquired again about the absence of an answer regarding the VIN, suggesting possible unease about the car's history and compliance with regulations.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express a fondness for the 2CV, with @PNut noting that driving a 2CV invariably brings a smile, and @Frank_Barrett sharing enthusiasm for a specific 'Sorry' decal that he wants for his friends. @DMeyer001 shows interest in the car's photos, indicating a desire for more visual details, which suggests potential buyers' eagerness to understand the vehicle better. @kmcgann (The Seller) emphasizes the car's good condition and history with previous owners, highlighting a community of 2CV enthusiasts eager to connect over shared interests.
Neutral: Some comments raise questions about the vehicle's specifics. @strawway and @bobalu inquire about the steering wheel condition and potential rust issues, which indicates a practical concern among potential buyers. @coffeebreak reminds others that smog test regulations vary by state, showing a level of caution for those considering purchasing the vehicle. @RBBGroup comments on the photos, noting inconsistencies in the condition and timeline, which reflects an analytical approach to assessing the vehicle's condition.
Negative: There are concerns raised about the car’s condition, with @RBBGroup and @bobalu highlighting potential rust and the roof's appearance in photos. @bobalu specifically asks for more detailed images of the undercarriage and suspension due to rust concerns, signaling buyer anxiety about hidden issues. Additionally, @Ben_Boyle mentions the difficulty of registering a post-1967 2CV in California, which could limit the potential buyer's market for this vehicle and impacts the overall perception.
|
 |
Positive: @Antdelario praised the bike, calling it a good looking build, and @bmk5547 found the time-lapse video showcasing the bike's build to be very interesting. The seller, @Jelibug, frequently expresses appreciation for the craftsmanship of the previous owner and builder, Mike at Bay City Restorations, underscoring the quality of work put into the bike. The seller also highlights features like the reflective paint on the frame and wheels, which he shared in videos to reflect the bike's visual appeal and performance during ride-bys.
Neutral: @Jelibug has shared several updates and videos to keep potential buyers informed about the bike's condition and performance. He communicates openly about the bike's maintenance details, such as the installation of magnetic drain plugs and the order of a replacement fork cap. He also mentions the bike is kept garaged, ensuring it remains in good condition while sharing personal anecdotes about his experience with previous motorcycles and plans for transport after the sale, demonstrating a commitment to customer service.
Negative: The seller, @Jelibug, has mentioned some challenges related to his age and health, indicating that he is no longer able to enjoy riding as he once did, which is a reason for selling the bike. He also expresses that he has faced difficulties with weather conditions affecting his ability to create ride-by videos, reflecting the uncertainties in showcasing the vehicle's performance. Additionally, there was an issue with losing a fork cap, although he assures potential buyers that he will address this before the sale.
|
 |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle's Cobalt Blue color, considered rare and visually appealing. @solarfish expresses personal bias as an owner of a Cobalt Coupe, highlighting it as one of the best colors on a 996 model. @CapricornGuy also shares enthusiasm, noting that this car is likely only the fifth Cobalt Blue 996 he has seen in ten years of observation, emphasizing its unique appeal. Additionally, @EZPZ123Z reminisces positively about his past ownership, describing the car as fun and reliable, which adds credibility to its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: The seller, @NeinElf, provides detailed insights about the car's condition and history in response to inquiries regarding maintenance needs. They acknowledge the car's first owner history, noting it has had ten previous owners and a mileage of over 150,000. @Lesr3204 raises questions about specific mechanical aspects based on the current mileage, emphasizing the importance of maintenance such as the cam deviation and timing guide, which suggests thorough scrutiny by buyers. Both @Lesr3204 and @NeinElf engage in a technical discussion about the vehicle's performance and necessary maintenance, indicating a shared concern for the well-being of the car.
Negative: Some comments are critical regarding the car's high mileage and the potential need for significant maintenance. @Lesr3204 points out that maintenance issues linked to cam deviation are not optimal and suggests that prior owners may have neglected important upkeep. This insight may raise doubts about the car's reliability moving forward. The discussion about needing a reserve price amidst personal circumstances of the seller also hints at potential concerns regarding the vehicle's valuation based on its condition and mileage, which could deter some buyers.
|
 |
Positive: Commentors appreciate the vehicle's visual appeal and condition, with @ABog confidently stating it should fetch a high price. @ZstngZ praises its aesthetics, particularly the color scheme, suggesting it's a strong contender for collectors focusing on Mustang values. Enthusiastic remarks about the low mileage, like those from @krazytrkr reminiscing about their own Laguna Seca, display admiration for its collectible nature and enjoyment potential.
Neutral: Several questions arise regarding the car's specifications, including inquiries about the original shifter and whether it has been tracked, with @sixgun320 prompting discussion about its usage. @tracey6858 requests further images of specific areas, while @HPAutosource asks about potential wheel damage, showing an interest in the car's thorough evaluation. The seller, @tinaben69, provides clarifications regarding the activation of the track key and the status of the original components, which seem to be in contention among commenters.
Negative: There are concerns about some missing elements and potential misrepresentation, especially regarding the splitter's authenticity, pointed out by @XRACER153 and @Blk_T4l0n. The vehicle's original tires and fluids, mentioned by another commenter, raise red flags about readiness for driving, indicating that the car may require additional investment before use. Additionally, some express disappointment over the absence of the original Laguna Seca splitter, indicating that such components contribute significantly to the car's value.
|
Tony Quiroga’s 35k-Mile 1991 BMW 325i Convertible 5-Speed
WBABB1316MEC04338
Lot 240760
Private Party
 |
Positive: @GDogg expresses admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive nature as a 325i Cabriolet. @SWFFerrari430 also praises the aesthetics of the car, calling it beautiful and noting the appreciation for its convertible style. Furthermore, @bmwe30m3guy shares excitement about the value of the car, suggesting it could easily be worth $35k due to value-adding features, while @psychrunner remarks on the attractive low mileage of the E30 Cabrio.
Neutral: Comments about the vehicle's history and condition are varied. @Guaupants, the seller, provides background information on the car including its purchase from the original owner and details about modifications and maintenance it has received over the years. @KevinK and @bmwe30m3guy discuss the transitions in design elements for this model year, reflecting on the specifics of its bumpers and production dates, which is met with informative replies from @Guaupants regarding its specifications. @ThejudgeRoy and @JoshRan ask practical questions about the features and functionality of the vehicle, such as the nature of the soft top and sound system, which @Guaupants answers thoroughly.
Negative: There are some doubts expressed regarding the vehicle. @thorofare raises a potential concern about missing repair orders, seeking clarity on the car's service record. Additionally, @missingmye30 shares a sentiment about the aesthetic appeal of the bumpers, suggesting a preference for the diving board style over the plastic bumpers. @EdmontonCarGuy questions the mileage usage of an automotive writer, implying skepticism about the seller's claims regarding personal usage of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, with @59soldus23 calling it "absolutely GEORGOUS", and @bemrfst complimenting it as one of the best looking Corvettes in a while, particularly appreciating the blue color. @ZoraDreamscape (The Seller) highlighted the car's pristine condition, mentioning its limited use and careful maintenance, reinforcing its appeal. The unique configuration of the car, noted to be a rare model with only 53 Grand Sport convertibles featuring a specific stripe, further increased its desirability among potential buyers.
Neutral: Many questions were posed regarding the vehicle's specifications and history. Commenters like @karfever and @68CamaroSS396L78 inquired about the tires, including their age and maintenance performed on the transmission. @Wmkonier asked for detailed photos of blemishes on the vehicle, which @ZoraDreamscape (The Seller) promptly addressed, indicating there were few and describing their condition. The seller also mentioned the car had been largely garage-kept, contributing to its overall excellent state. @dawgeq87 raised a concern about the car's history based on its CARFAX reports, which led to clarifications regarding previous ownership.
Negative: Concerns were raised by commenters regarding the car's maintenance history and potential past as a rental vehicle. @dawgeq87 specifically questioned the multiple entries in the CARFAX report, suggesting it may have been a rental unit, which could cast doubt on its care and use. Additionally, @68CamaroSS396L78 inquired about the maintenance of the transmission, particularly whether a critical triple flush had been performed, to which @ZoraDreamscape (The Seller) admitted it had not been done. This lack of certain maintenance raised some eyebrows among the auction participants.
|
 |
Positive: @DKeng praises the vehicle, highlighting its appealing color combination and rarity, noting it as one of approximately 609 427R's made in 2010. He appreciates the nice features such as the short throw shifter, blue insert seats, and wheels, and relishes the fun driving experience it offers, although he mentions the challenge of storing it afterward. @CoachShakey, the seller, provides additional insights into the car, confirming it includes nearly all offered options and directs potential buyers to an informative article for further details.
Neutral: @68CamaroSS396L78 inquires about the specific transmission in the 2010 Mustang, asking if it is equipped with a 5-speed Tremec transmission. @CoachShakey responds affirmatively, confirming that the vehicle does indeed have the TR-3650 5-speed manual transmission. This exchange reflects a general interest in the technical specifications of the car.
Negative: @mike_rockwell criticizes the absence of a drive video for the vehicle, suggesting that failing to provide this visual content may reduce the car's market value. This comment implies that the lack of comprehensive showcasing may deter potential buyers, highlighting the importance of thorough promotional material for such a unique vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @chanlawr mentioned the car looks great, and @Riv19 praised the mention of the dealer inspection. @Dwight44 provided a personal account of the car's history, noting that it has been well cared for by the current owner, who is an excellent driver. @justanamateur emphasized the importance of the car being from Southern California, suggesting warm conditions contribute positively to the vehicle's durability.
Neutral: @jrobertsondr (The Seller) shared that they haven't had bore scoring done but mentioned the car's low usage and warm climate. They confirmed that the car was inspected at a local Porsche dealership with no major issues but did not provide a DME report. They also stated the car has original books and manuals, but some questions arose around specific inspections related to bore scoring and other mechanical checks.
Negative: There were concerns raised by multiple commenters about the lack of bore scoring analysis and DME report, leading to questions about the car's overall health, notably from @abhibrandy1 and @Wuzzer. @cjkdds stated observable issues like a bent window near the driver's door and inquired about the car's paint condition, brake, and clutch status. @blackrider's comment was flagged as non-constructive, indicating a degree of contention in the discussion.
|
 |
Positive: @lantzbros1 (The Seller) mentioned that the vehicle runs and drives perfectly without any issues. He has provided a current video of the vehicle in operation, confirming its drivable condition. This assurance seems to provide confidence to potential buyers regarding the performance of the vehicle.
Neutral: @Reynman73 inquired about the presence of air conditioning in the vehicle. @lantzbros1 (The Seller) clarified that this particular model does not include A/C. Additionally, @Rakkasan2187 asked whether the vehicle is drivable even with a broken glow plug, to which @lantzbros1 (The Seller) confirmed that it drives fine, indicating that the damage does not impede its functionality.
Negative: @Waterdawg2004 raised concerns about possible blow-by when the oil fill cap is removed, asking for clarification. @lantzbros1 (The Seller) responded that he has not observed any blow-by while operating the vehicle, though he had never specifically looked for it, which may leave some uncertainty for potential buyers regarding the engine's condition.
|
 |
Positive: @Rodeo_King praised the vehicle, mentioning an affordable service to make it ready for travel. @Gmmuscleusa expressed enthusiasm, highlighting the truck's desirable features such as its factory color scheme and being a stepside. @psf1962 also commented on the truck's appearance and marketability, affirming that it's a highly desirable model.
Neutral: @STEELANDSTEEZ (The Seller) described the vehicle as a beautiful 2003 GMC Sierra Sportside with low mileage and detailed its maintenance history. The seller also mentioned the clean title and lack of accidents, while offering to provide additional photos or assist with transport for interested buyers. Furthermore, the seller responded effectively to queries about specific details, such as bed length and condition assessments.
Negative: @BESTPAL1 raised concerns about potential hail damage and asked for clarity regarding the condition of the truck's roof and driver side door. @GCS21588 inquired whether the seller was a dealership that could provide a title license plate, demonstrating a sense of caution about the purchase. @BESTPAL1's inquiries suggest some skepticism about the truck's condition despite the positive features highlighted by others.
|
 |
Positive: @chester7 shared that the 4C gets the most looks among their collection of six cars and described driving it as thrilling without any negatives. @Pizzadude2010 mentioned that the car is ready to go after recent servicing, emphasizing that despite the low mileage, it's suitable for driving. @Pizzadude2010 also suggested that the price could justify adding miles to the car for a weekend sports car experience. Additionally, @rjwhitalfa remarked on the allure of the vehicle, describing it as special and expressing excitement for potential new owners, while @socaljam highlighted the comprehensive service performed on the car, including a new timing belt, making it close to new in condition.
Neutral: @fairmont663336 mentioned the need for a backstory about the car, indicating curiosity about its history. @benandaliza expressed a desire for a manual transmission, which could have enhanced the bidding interest. @deanstr33t raised a question about the appearance of the car sitting higher in the front, suggesting it might be common among these models. @czl6lx inquired about the smog test compliance for potential California buyers, indicating procedural considerations for those purchasing the car there. @socaljam provided detailed information about the car's condition and service history, which is crucial for potential bidders.
Negative: @jwhboomer criticized the car's extremely low mileage, suggesting that a test drive would be impossible. @E.Bugatti doubted the value of the servicing on such a low-mileage car, hinting at potential underlying issues. @loudnotfast commented about the impracticality of owning a vehicle like this strictly as an investment, suggesting it should be driven more. @vizsla raised concerns about the reliability of a car that has been idle for an extended period, suggesting it may require more than regular service. Lastly, @simplyanenthusiast99 discussed the financial loss associated with such vehicles over time, reinforcing a perception that they shouldn’t be collected but driven instead.
|
 |
Positive: @joemercolino (The Seller) shares that the vehicle has widespread appeal, frequently receiving positive attention from others, including thumbs up and waves. Younger individuals are eager for a ride, highlighting its fun factor. The seller emphasizes the vibrant red paint, which is more impressive in person than in photos, and notes the car is in very good condition and easy to drive, being highly responsive. The seller jokingly mentions that removing the exhaust caps can create a thrilling experience, making neighbors crazy.
Neutral: @whthrse inquired about the comfort and fit of the Brookville steel body compared to traditional ’29 Ford Roadsters, sharing personal experiences with size and discomfort in other models due to height and knee issues. @eldonchas responded, confirming that the Brookville bodies maintain the original dimensions, noting that the 28 and 29 have smaller doors than the 30 and 31, which might affect accessibility. @whthrse sought clarification on specifics like gas pedal placement, reflecting how fitting and comfort are important considerations for prospective buyers.
Negative: Despite the mostly positive comments, there is an underlying concern about comfort in the car's interior, as expressed by @whthrse. The difficulty experienced in fitting comfortably in similar models suggests that there could be limitations for taller or larger individuals. While the comments do not reflect any direct negative experiences with the vehicle's performance, the focus on physical fit may indicate that this car may not be suitable for everyone, particularly those with specific physical limitations.
|
 |
Positive: @supertek describes the vehicle as "absolutely gorgeous," while @Jlerosen compliments it as a "great looking bronco!" @grmkwd07 also praises its appearance, calling it a "great looking truck." The seller, @BigKitch, mentions that the truck has received many positive comments in person due to its vibrant green color, which has been refreshed with a professionally refinished roll cage. He emphasizes that the truck is a solid driver, capable of smooth starts and strong performance, garnering positive feedback on its build quality.
Neutral: @Moshes1 inquires about a picture without the rooftop, to which @BigKitch promptly responds with topless photos, mentioning minor imperfections from before the roll cage's refinishing. @Rhughes2 expresses interest in viewing the truck in person, leading to the seller offering to arrange a viewing for serious bidders. @Micks41 asks specific questions regarding the hardtop's inclusion in the auction and the condition of the paint and body, receiving detailed information about the truck's history and condition from the seller along with additional photos documenting the restoration process.
Negative: @Pnola raises concerns about the cracks near the gas tank/left rear side marker, questioning why they weren't repaired before listing the truck for sale. Additionally, @Pnola points out inconsistencies regarding the engine's valve covers in the build photos and seeks further details about the engine's specifications. These comments highlight potential issues that could be seen as red flags for prospective buyers, indicating that there may be unresolved concerns about the truck's condition.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle has received a lot of praise, with many commenters admiring its beauty and impressive features. @dj_walls2424 highlighted the car by calling it a 'beauty' and receiving compliments from @Cdn043 and @Hulk2000, who noted the strong power of the motor and the stunning color. Commenters like @ATLCraig marveled at the quality of the Cobras listed by the seller and expressed eagerness to own one, affirming the craftsmanship of @dj_walls2424's offerings. The car's upgrades, including the leather seat wrapping, have also received positive remarks, showcasing the enhancements made to the vehicle to improve its aesthetic and performance.
Neutral: Several comments clarified technical aspects and provided valuable insights about the vehicle's history. @dj_walls2424 detailed the differences between factory-built models and self-assembled kit cars, emphasizing the benefits of choosing a Backdraft Racing car due to its consistent build quality and assembly. The seller answered questions about the vehicle's build year and tire age to provide transparency to potential bidders, reinforcing the reliability and operator-friendliness of the car. In addition, @mccastro777 brought up cosmetic observations, further enriching the discussion without casting any significant light on negative aspects.
Negative: While there was an overall positive reception, some comments hinted at concerns or reservations. @mccastro777 pointed out the scrapes along the bottom front of the vehicle, seeking confirmation about their condition, indicating a concern about potential damage, although @dj_walls2424 assured them that they were just touch-ups. Additionally, @Sunbeamdon expressed a nostalgic sentiment about the absence of a second roll bar, indicating a personal preference that might slightly detract from some buyers' interests. Despite these concerns, the general excitement surrounding the car outweighed the negatives.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's aesthetics and performance. @m2711c described the car as 'very nice looking' with a 'sweet' engine sound. @Russ praised the car's color and noted that the previous owner appeared to have taken good care of it. @MNberg called it a 'beautiful MG TC' and complimented the unique dark color, suggesting it's an exciting classic at an affordable price compared to other foreign sports cars. The seller, @Scout60, emphasized the car's stunning appearance and joyful driving experience, likening it to a time machine while highlighting that it runs strong and idles well after starting.
Neutral: Several comments discussed specific details regarding the car's condition and features, eliciting some informative exchanges. @Russ asked various questions about potential issues, including an oil leak and tire conditions, to which @Scout60 provided comprehensive answers. The seller acknowledged that there is a minor oil spot after drives, which may improve with repairs. Enthusiasts like @morganplus8 and @BALA also provided technical insights regarding the vehicle's features and engine, confirming aspects such as the steering wheel's rarity and discussing the engine's status as a replacement. The conversation showed a common interest in understanding the car's vintage mechanics and updates that might enhance its performance.
Negative: A few comments highlighted concerns regarding certain aspects of the vehicle, particularly about its technical specifications and maintenance needs. @morganplus8 pointed out that the car would inevitably have leaks due to age, though he noted that it is not fragile and can still be driven regularly. @agingengineer mentioned the need to replace miscellaneous screws, implying that attention to detail is required for proper preservation. Additionally, some commenters sought clarification on the condition of features like the tachometer, where @GB1947 discovered that it was listed as non-working. While these comments suggest some concerns, they also reflect a realistic approach to acquiring and enjoying a classic car.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's build quality and features. @BowRat appreciated the construction of the D2, sharing his own positive experience with the model. @Jeff_wright specifically praised the beauty of the build and inquired about the spring specifications, which @510-997 (The Seller) clarified by detailing the high-quality OLD MAN EMU 2779 springs used. Other commenters like @schleven and @LandCruiserEnjoyer highlighted the overall craftsmanship and aesthetic, suggesting that the vehicle was built with care and consideration, making it an appealing choice for enthusiasts.
Neutral: The Seller, @510-997, introduced the Land Rover Discovery series 2 and provided a detailed account of its history and upgrades since the purchase in 2009. He mentioned the vehicle's improvements, including a new engine replacement under warranty and meticulous attention to maintenance, particularly highlighting no accidents or paintwork. While providing answers to questions regarding details like the cooling system and frame condition, @510-997 maintained transparency, implying a trustworthiness in the vehicle's condition through personal care rather than relying solely on dealership records.
Negative: Some comments hinted at potential concerns. @ctward17 asked about the engine's rebuilding status, raising concerns about the meticulousness of repairs and component replacements. In response, @510-997 explained the replacement history but did not provide full receipts, which could be a drawback for meticulous buyers. Additionally, @tbone330i expressed an interest in the decision to avoid certain parts like the TerraFirma steering bars, with @510-997 mentioning prior negative experiences with them, implying that better options were available but not necessarily known to the average buyer.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters praised the vehicle's durability and cool factor, with @Geteze highlighting the impressive ownership history and the classic appeal of the Volvo. @cornfieldave expressed admiration for the seller's family care of the car, and @johnbennett103 referred to the car's reliability and simplicity, fondly reminiscing about owning a similar model in the past. Overall, the sentiments reflected a deep appreciation for the vehicle's history and character.
Neutral: Several comments revolved around inquiries about the vehicle's title and potential registration complications due to its branded status. @shooker and @Cnodnarb raised questions regarding the 'total loss' designation after a collision, while @chriso1iver (The Seller) provided clarifications about the car's insurance. Additionally, discussions about specific car features and modifications, including the vintage VIN plate, were shared among commenters, indicating a community of enthusiasts engaged in thorough discussions about the car's specifications and history.
Negative: Concerns were noted about the vehicle's insurance issues due to its branded title, as pointed out by @shooker and @Cnodnarb. Some commenters expressed confusion or surprise regarding the vehicle's current bidding situation, with @Dollycat3 and @RCP implying that the opening bid might be a mistake. There were also cautious inquiries about the car's actual condition post-collision, showcasing hesitance among some prospective buyers regarding the car's history.
|
 |
Positive: @BMWE90Guy commented that the truck looks great and suggested that the next owner should add BFGoodrich A/T tires, which should be mounted with the letters facing outward. @Gmmuscleusa praised the truck for upgrading from the twin beam to a Dana 60, calling it an excellent truck. @TCC1 noted that the truck appeared ready for work after its restoration in 2018, expressing admiration for the quality of the restoration. @perch97 shared that significant work had been completed on the truck's axles and other components, ensuring they were in top condition, highlighting new parts like wheel bearings, ball joints, and even modifications to the transmission, enhancing overall vehicle performance and reliability.
Neutral: @Linecapt sought clarification on which paint and body panels were current versus pre-2018, noting discrepancies in the photos. @JohnCaseyClark raised concerns about a minor engine oil leak, asking for specifics on its severity and source. @JohnCaseyClark also queried the truck's badge, asking for confirmation about the F-250 versus F-350 designation. @TwoSev27 questioned why a cab corner wasn't replaced during the restoration and asked for a driving video, while @Bronco76er inquired about the installation of 1-ton springs under the truck, both reflecting an interest in the vehicle's condition and modifications.
Negative: @CoreySwanstrom expressed curiosity about the condition of the seats under the seat covers. @TwoSev27 questioned the lack of a hitch installation after the painting and restoration, indicating a perceived missed opportunity. Overall, there seems to be skepticism about certain aspects of the restoration, particularly regarding the condition of body panels and the effectiveness of the restoration efforts. Additionally, @JohnCaseyClark's questions about the oil leak indicated concerns over potential future issues that could arise from it.
|
114ci-Powered 2020 Harley-Davidson Electra Glide Standard
1HD1FVC28LB660453
Lot 240775
Private Party
 |
Positive: Commentors like @Slick1964 and @BubRudy have praised the bike for its aesthetics, with @Slick1964 calling it a beautiful bike and @BubRudy describing everything done right on it, also expressing interest in the supplier of custom parts. @Dogman07 compliments the bike's tasteful upgrades and expresses enthusiasm about the potential for further enhancements like adding a speaker system. Overall, the bike resonates well with enthusiasts, being seen as a solid build with great potential for customization.
Neutral: In comments from @Goode96 (The Seller), there is a lot of information clarification regarding the bike's specifications and available features. The seller details the bike's engine upgrade to a Screamin’ Eagle 114” Stage 3 kit, which enhances performance significantly over the original stock model. Questions from potential buyers about original parts, maximum speed, and modifications are met with prompt and informative responses, indicating a responsive seller eager to assist prospective buyers in their decision making.
Negative: There are few outright negative comments regarding the bike, though concerns do arise about the availability of original parts and possible add-ons. @Berserker619 asks about missing components like passenger floorboards and backrests, reflecting a possible downside for those looking for a fully-equipped bike. Additionally, @EschanHatoli inquires about the bike’s maximum speed and tire performance at high speeds, which suggests potential buyers may have some reservations about the bike's capabilities under extreme conditions.
|
 |
Positive: @rjstephan mentioned they recently picked up a white 2015 Lexus LX 570, noting its nice condition with low mileage and good maintenance history. @Connoisseur1956 shared their favorable experience with a similar vehicle, expressing that this model can last for generations when properly maintained and praised the attractive color combination. The seller, @unique_preowned, emphasized the vehicle's meticulous care and recent service, highlighting its durability and luxurious features, which contribute to its exceptional appeal for potential buyers.
Neutral: @Chefgordiemac inquired about some minor damage and commented on the LX570's beauty. @PappaSierraHotel asked if there are available service records and about the dashboard material's condition, noting concerns about potential issues from that era. The seller responded to these inquiries, clarifying the history of the vehicle, including a repaint of the front bumper and the dashboard's pristine condition.
Negative: @TGwjacod-akota expressed disappointment regarding the photos provided, particularly requesting a specific shot of the driver's seat bolster. Overall, there were no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle's performance or condition, aside from inquiries for more information and specific details about its features.
|
 |
Positive: @Klyphman shared that the car is exceptionally fast in a straight line, comparable to newer models, and sounds amazing, bringing back fond memories of racing. For those looking into this vehicle, @skonker emphasized that it's important to use it as intended—on a closed track rather than as a street car, supporting its purpose and enhancing the owner's experience. @Geoff911sc noted the affordability of operating the Cup Car compared to other vehicles, highlighting the accessibility of maintenance if one is willing to do some work themselves.
Neutral: @Premierautofl, the seller, responded positively to queries about the vehicle's condition, stating that it currently has street tires and a clean title. The seller noted the vehicle's unique status, mentioning the previous ownership and some details regarding its racing certifications. Several commenters, including @redlinedp, expressed interest in specific operational hours of the engine and transmission, indicating a need for detailed documentation regarding the car's history and maintenance.
Negative: However, there were concerns raised about the title and legality. @Geoff911sc pointed out that these Cup Cars are purpose-built race vehicles and typically not sold with a title, which caused some confusion about the current owner's claim of a "clean and clear title." @dchunk911 expressed skepticism over the vehicle's daily usability and the risks associated with street driving a car designed for the track. @doginblack mentioned losing interest due to the title situation, indicating deeper concerns about the car's street legality.
|
 |
Positive: @Tintype (The Seller) indicated that the vehicle is well maintained and presents very well, with recent service noted. @Phillip_Shaffer expressed love for the same car in black, while @gscharnagl praised the stunning color combination of the vehicle. Additionally, @merkins2000 acknowledged the car's excellent service history despite a complex CARFAX report, reaffirming its overall appeal. The vehicle is also equipped with massaging seats, which is a desirable feature for many buyers.
Neutral: @Lowr8ts inquired about an accident reported, to which @Tintype (The Seller) explained a minor cosmetic damage entry was noted in the Carfax back in 2019, but no visible issues exist now. @ampow questioned the non-standard front grille, and @Tintype clarified that it was replaced with a Panamericana-style grille from a facelift model. @ginger asked about the lien holder and the title status, with @Tintype confirming it is with Bank of America and the title is currently electronic.
Negative: @Lowr8ts and @pmattouk raised concerns regarding the vehicle's history, with @pmattouk specifically asking for clarification on the six previous owners. @merkins2000 remarked on the confusion caused by the multiple CARFAX entries, suggesting a need for better documentation. Additionally, there was a question raised about the transmission service being conducted at a Mazda service center, which @HighStandards_AMG found odd, prompting discussion about the vehicle's maintenance history.
|
 |
Positive: The vehicle is described as an extremely unique Aston Martin Rapide S, with appealing features such as the availability of two keys, a tool kit, a trickle charger, and factory catalytic converters. The seller has been responsive to inquiries, promising cold start audio and visual content, as well as pictures of the front seats without aftermarket covers. The car is praised by commentors, particularly @alex.gunns who lauds its beauty, and @rickybobby shows interest in the original exhaust, which the seller confirms is included with the sale. Overall, the engagement with potential buyers has been positive, with the seller providing timely information and reassurance.
Neutral: There are several inquiries concerning the vehicle's details, such as the current lien and the included original parts. Commentors @MyMyMy and @Boatbiker specifically raise points about the lien payoff and whether the original exhaust and catalytic converters are part of the sale. The seller clarifies these points, noting that the vehicle is being sold on consignment with a lien that will be settled post-auction. This indicates a transparent approach to the transaction, where concerns are addressed without additional confusion.
Negative: Some comments express concern over potential dealer fees and the existing lien on the vehicle, with @RandomAnalyst explicitly stating they would prefer not to deal with these issues. The mention of dealer add-on fees implies dissatisfaction with common dealership practices that could complicate the sale. @Boatbiker also highlights the need for clarity regarding the catalytic converters due to state regulations, reflecting a cautious attitude among potential buyers.
|
 |
Positive: @schigh reminisces fondly about the vintage features of the car, such as push-button transmission and rear breezeway windows, which evoke memories from his youth. @Meisel also shares a personal connection, recalling his father's pink and gray Mercury from the early 60s, describing it as a nice car. @stugottz and @Dollycat3 both express admiration for the vehicle's beauty, with @Dollycat3 emphasizing the stunning color combination and gorgeous interior while @bringatrailer highlights the car's unique historical features, including the breezeway window and push-button controls, generating excitement for its public display.
Neutral: Several commenters discuss the historical significance of the Mercury Turnpike Cruiser, noting its unique branding and legacy in American automotive history. @td67gp shares a detailed account of the car's past and its connection to Ford's corporate decisions in the 1950s. @63impalaboy describes the car as a symbol of both American auto design and a representation of the burgeoning Eisenhower Interstate System. Additionally, @goodhunting and others clarify the usage of the term 'Phaeton' in relation to this model, indicating that there is some agreement on the terminology used by Mercury in their marketing at the time.
Negative: In the comments, there are concerns about the car's speedometer not working properly, with @Neil1956 questioning why it remains non-functional despite repairs. @bluesrocker notes the lack of bids on the car despite its aesthetic appeal, indicating apprehension around its import status affecting buyer interest. Additionally, @TJClassic points out a discrepancy regarding the model designation as a Phaeton, emphasizing that it is inaccurately labeled, which sparked a debate among commenters about the correct classification of the vehicle.
|
 |
Positive: @Secretariat19 described the vehicle as 'Beautiful', showing positive sentiment towards its aesthetic appeal. @FridaysMotors (The Seller) also communicated enthusiasm about the auction, expressing confidence that someone will take home an awesome car. They highlighted the excellent condition of the underlying paint and protection from the wrap, which contributes to the vehicle's appeal.
Neutral: Several inquiries were made regarding the condition and details of the vehicle, such as @Hedgy700 asking for pictures of the damage and @OldsRocketMan inquiring about the removal of the wrap. Other comments included questions about lien payments by @player123 and further details on the aftermarket head unit by @EJoos. @FridaysMotors (The Seller) provided informative responses, indicating transparency and willingness to assist prospective buyers.
Negative: There were some concerns raised by commenters such as @OldsRocketMan and @Noahyjohn regarding the cost and implications of removing the wrap, suggesting a certain level of apprehension about the potential costs of restoring the original finish. Additionally, @RevNDrive expressed disappointment about the absence of the OEM navigation head unit, indicating that some buyers might have preferred the original equipment to be included in the sale.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the Citroën GS Birotor, highlighting its rarity and unique design. @ekmcmullen described it as 'super rare' and 'weird gets weirder,' while @randy, co-founder of BaT, shared excitement about seeing it in person, noting the fascinating rotary story behind it. @harvest pointed out the vehicle's exceptional condition and expressed a desire to acquire it, emphasizing that it is a remarkable piece of Citroën history. Overall, there is a sense of appreciation for the car's quirky character and distinctive engineering, with many considering it a true gem within the automotive world.
Neutral: Some comments highlighted the car's intriguing background and engineering flaws without biasing significantly towards admiration or criticism. @serj and @harvest discussed the historical context of Citroën's challenges with maintaining the rotary engine, explaining how many units were bought back and destroyed due to technical issues. Commenters like @philmanns provided insights into the engine and transaxle configurations, clarifying common misconceptions around the Birotor's reliability and maintenance experiences. The discussion also included reflections on the vehicle’s backstory, market dynamics, and the collector community's connection to such unique vehicles.
Negative: Several commenters raised concerns about the vehicle's reliability and the rotary engine's issues. @biffer mentioned that despite its scarcity, the Birotor is 'not sought after,' demonstrating that uniqueness does not necessarily equate to desirability. @harvest elaborated on the known problems with apex seals in rotary engines that have historically plagued this model, leading to catastrophic failures and costly repairs, while others called out the overall high maintenance demands of such a vehicle. The discussions reveal a cautious approach toward potential buyers, emphasizing the unique, but often criticized nature of the GS Birotor, shadowed by its intricate history.
|
2k-Mile 2004 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 40th Anniversary 5-Speed
1FAFP45X44F124039
Lot 240732
Dealer
 |
Positive: @Mychordistooshort highlighted the beauty of the car, emphasizing how well the Crimson color shines in the sun and its appeal during the Mustangs 40th Anniversary events in 2004. The car's Mach 1000 stereo option is also noted as a fantastic bonus. @nexusautobrokers (The Seller) agreed, reminiscing about the popularity of this color in the 90s and 2000s with American muscle cars. Many commenters, including @dozingboz, expressed admiration for the car's appearance, indicating it retains a great look with features like the spoiler-delete option, while also noting positive impressions of the car's overall quality.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions about the vehicle's documentation and condition. @mototwin1 queried about the absence of paperwork and expressed concern over the limited maintenance history provided, particularly due to the car’s age despite its low mileage. @ATP1983 and @z282slo also engaged in discussions about the mobile phone and the date codes of the tires, respectively, shedding light on the car's historical features. @mototwin1 noted that some critical maintenance records seem to be missing, which is a common concern among potential buyers of collector vehicles.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the lack of documentation, particularly with @mototwin1 highlighting the absence of detailed maintenance records over the years, which could be a red flag for buyers. The omission of a window sticker was also seen as a downside, with @mototwin1 adding that prospective owners might expect such documentation for a collectible car. There was skepticism regarding the originality of the tires, with some comments suggesting that they should be replaced for safety, even if they appear good. Overall, while the car's aesthetic appeal is praised, the lack of paperwork and maintenance history has left some potential buyers worried about what they might be getting into.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetic appeal and performance. @Eurowagonguy described it as the "most beautiful E21 ever made," while @David_P simply stated, "Yowza! Hubba Hubba." The general sentiment highlights the car's design, with others like @CraZyDR777 (The Seller) emphasizing its enjoyable driving experience. The exotic modifications also resonated with fans, with @Jimmyblues1959 appreciating the significant engine upgrade. Additionally, comments such as "Such a blast to drive on the edge" and "a gorgeous example" from @torrey0012 further intensified the admiration for the vehicle's capabilities and visual charm.
Neutral: Several commenters engaged in discussions about the vehicle's history and condition without strong opinions either way. @Tuscan inquired about the documentation accompanying the car, while others expressed curiosity about specific features, such as the vehicle’s missing cap on fluid levels and the specifications of the drivetrain. Comments like @Dspoljaric's "Stunning example — GLWTA" reflect a neutral but appreciative stance towards the vehicle's aesthetics and overall value, with many users offering congratulations for the auction without deep critiques.
Negative: There were a few critical comments regarding the modifications made to the vehicle. @urielle flagged certain aspects as non-constructive, indicating skepticism about the modifications, and @Dan_in_Reno defended against this negativity by suggesting there's value in subjective preferences. @mrjirey lamented the absence of a rear spoiler, reflecting disappointment in what some see as missing elements of the car's original design. Overall, while few outright criticized the vehicle, concerns about originality surfaced in the comments, particularly among purists.
|
 |
Positive: Commenters generally expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and unique characteristics. @Jaymac824 called it a "beauty," while @Tony-Trans-Am compared its menacing look in black to the famous Christine, suggesting it could hold its own against that iconic car. @Stinger17 praised the rare tuxedo black with white interior, and @PhilVair echoed this sentiment about it being an all-original survivor, describing it as "vairy nice." @porkpiehat noted its exceptional design as a Corsa, while @hairyolds appreciated the rarity of the color combination, reinforcing its allure among enthusiasts.
Neutral: In addition to the praise, there were several clarifications and inquiries regarding the vehicle's specifications. @gopar73 (The Seller) and @GrigioF430 provided technical insights, confirming that the car is not turbocharged and detailing the engine setup. @robertwichert sought clarification about the vehicle's configuration, while @compras initiated a discussion on preparing for a long road trip with the classic car. @Chuckha62 pointed out a potential issue with the driver's seat, stressing the importance of a repair before extensive use, further engaging in practical matters related to the vehicle's condition and potential refurbishments.
Negative: Conversely, some comments raised concerns or expressed skepticism about the vehicle's condition. @CarFoolLane challenged the accuracy of the upholstery description, claiming leather was not available for Corvairs during that era. @joea99 questioned a visible action happening in the driver's rear wheel well, seeking clarification on whether it was a fuel or battery cutoff issue. Additionally, @compras shared a general apprehension about driving the vehicle over a long distance, revealing potential doubts about its readiness for such a journey. Overall, while the vehicle is viewed favorably, there's a cautious undercurrent regarding its specifics and readiness.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, appreciating its character as a fun, driver-oriented car rather than a showpiece. @Valiantjim characterizes it as a "great opportunity for a guilt-free driver," reflecting a sentiment that these modifications contribute to a unique driving experience. @Chefgordiemac also highlights it as a "good, honest C3 that needs to be driven," suggesting it holds a charm that makes it appealing to lovers of classic cars. @FlywheelGarage, the seller, reassures potential buyers about the vehicle's performance and history, emphasizing that it runs and drives well, and noting the recent improvements made by 1945 Speed and Custom.
Neutral: Several comments delve into the details and specifications of the vehicle, with @Goog66 and @Hud1086 both questioning the authenticity of the claimed model year due to visible modifications from the original configuration. The seller @FlywheelGarage clarifies that the car is indeed a '68 model with a '72 front end and provides background on its modifications, which were made by the owner's grandfather. Commenters like @JBmarcum and @Triumph27 point out discrepancies and request further documentation about the vehicle's history and maintenance, indicating that while the car looks nice, there are more concerns to address before it can be fully assessed.
Negative: Skepticism arises from some commenters about the vehicle's authenticity and modifications. @johnnyvett points out the mismatched parts, suggesting it may have been salvaged after an accident, describing the exterior modifications as questionable and hinting at a lack of transparency in the listing. @sleepchamber expresses concern about what appears to be corrosion on the harmonic balancer, while multiple users question the age of the tires and the functioning of the AC system. Overall, there are warnings about the potential purchase due to the vehicle's uncertain past and modifications that could complicate its value.
|
 |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its pristine condition and low mileage. @carnutty emphasized the car's excellent condition, noting the beauty and value at the current bid. @CB2024 appreciated the inspection reports and maintenance history at BMW dealers, while @Jasper7821 highlighted the vehicle's super low mileage and pristine condition, referring to it as a true gem.
Neutral: Some users expressed curiosity about the vehicle's ownership history and features. @Utahdesi asked about the limited number of owners, correlating this to the low mileage, while @NoDeuda raised questions concerning the tire and wheel sizes, which @Jasper7821 addressed by confirming the installation of correct tires and detailing the tire rotation process. The seller also provided additional information about the inclusion of Apple CarPlay and the car's rust-free condition, having lived in Southern Arizona.
Negative: Concerns arose regarding a reported damage incident on the Carfax report. @NoDeuda and @Idy-ho pointed out discrepancies between the initial clean Carfax and an updated damage report. @Jasper7821 adamantly maintained that the car has never been in an accident and explained the situation around a minor paint chip repair that potentially led to the report. He expressed frustration at the matter and outlined steps taken to resolve the report with Carfax.
|
 |
Positive: @halfthrottle highlights the rarity of finding an '89 F250 in good condition and appreciates its load and towing capabilities, noting that these trucks are durable and can handle tough jobs without wearing out easily. @jpuckjhawk points out that he owns a similar model, suggesting that those who purchased white trucks might have taken better care of them, indicating a positive perception of the truck's reliability and maintenance.
Neutral: @GAA (The Seller) provides clarification regarding the vehicle's location, stating it is in storage in Spring Valley, CA, after emphasizing that the AC is not currently functional. @kazda88 engages in a discussion regarding the condition of the vehicle, including inquiries about the interior and the dual fuel tank functionality, while also addressing the need for corrected information in the listing.
Negative: @GHarv993 expresses concern about the vehicle's accessibility for additional photos while questioning its operational status, noting the need for assurance that it will start when arranged for transportation. @JAbadie20 feels dissatisfied with the seller's vague response regarding passing emissions testing in California, while @kazda88 suggests that while this truck may not pass smog, it's still a solid deal if taken out of state, adding to the uncertainty surrounding the vehicle's regulatory status.
|
 |
Positive: Multiple users expressed admiration for the Mustang GT Fastback K-Code, highlighting its beauty and desirability. @Dollycat3 referred to it as a "beautiful GT Fastback K-Code," while @Hoppy18 described it as a "green slice of gorgeous." @AnalogManLC noted the vehicle's condition, complimenting the owner on the mods that enhance drivability and performance, consistent with a GT350. Many commentators, such as @schigh and @x73, shared fond memories and nostalgic experiences with similar vehicles, indicating a strong emotional connection to the Mustang brand and its history.
Neutral: Several comments provided additional insights into the Mustang's features, such as the absence of power steering and brakes as confirmed by @drevans951 (The Seller). @Gerry65 and @coopspeed discussed the variations in engine block colors between models, and @Valiantjim raised an interesting point about the rarity of performance cars with power features in the mid-60s. User @GSP2 inquired about restoration pictures, reflecting a wider interest in the vehicle's history and condition, while @TooLegit questioned the upgrade of heads to hardened seats, showcasing ongoing curiosity about the vehicle's specifications.
Negative: Not all feedback was positive, with some negative remarks regarding unknown aspects of the vehicle's condition. @punchsponge commented that larger yards and good visibility did not equate to speed, while @DsizzleTX faced criticism for a comment flagged as non-constructive. Concerns about rust from @Shelbyguy1 and questions from @wgribizi regarding the accuracy of the car's interior details reflected a cautious outlook on the vehicle's authenticity and potential hidden issues. Overall, while the Mustang's aesthetic appeal garnered enthusiasm, there were practical concerns about aspects that might undermine its value.
|
 |
Positive: @HeritageGruppe presents the Ferrari 512 BBi, highlighting its unique backstory and the passion of its owner, a designer who cherishes the car. Many commenters express admiration for the vehicle, calling it a timeless beauty and a dream car. @RonnyB shares nostalgic feelings about his high school aspirations, while @johnjm emphasizes the classic Ferrari features, asserting that this model encapsulates the essence of Ferraris. Overall, there is a shared appreciation for the car's design and legacy among fans and potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments about registration and emissions underscore potential considerations for buyers, particularly those in California. @fhenley raises questions about registration status and smog testing history, which @HeritageGruppe addresses, affirming that the car is registered and has passed smog tests in the past. There are also mentions of required maintenance and the practicality of servicing the Ferrari, indicating that the car, while sought after, will demand a commitment of time and resources from the new owner.
Negative: Concerns surface regarding the car's condition and necessary maintenance. @fhenley, for instance, points out that the vehicle hasn't had a full maintenance service since 2013, implying potential risks for immediate usage. Additionally, issues related to liens and the implications for purchasing price are raised by @caliche and @wingedwheels, noting that a winning bid may complicate financial arrangements. Overall, while the car is celebrated, there is a clear caution expressed about the financial and mechanical responsibilities associated with ownership.
|
|
|