Click On Chart to View Bid History Time Date Chart
Click On Auction Image To Go To Auction Listing
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the vehicle as an awesome specimen, expressing excitement about its cool factor and encouraging good luck with the sale. @buybid22 (The Seller) highlighted the car's stellar restoration, detailing its original engine, laser-straight body, show car paint, and valuable original documentation like the broadcast and trim tags. Other commenters like @ChargeRTBob and @Cryobrad54 admired the car's iconic design and uniqueness, stating it represents a significant moment in automotive history, with @ChargeRTBob reflecting on the nostalgia it inspires and the exceptional capabilities of the A12 Super Bee.
Neutral: Many participants engaged in discussions evaluating the vehicle's specifications, with @rd10014 and others asking clarifying questions about the original engine and modifications. @GBRBiLL explained the origins of the 440 engine conversion and touched on the unique production history of the A12 Super Bee, while @Intimidator04 and @PP0001 contributed additional insights on engine designations and the vehicle's design details. The comments also mentioned the distribution of production numbers and the assembly process to further elucidate the significance of this model.
Negative: Some comments noted confusion and potential errors regarding the vehicle's specified components, particularly around engine specifications and features like the hood. @BadAzp provided a cheeky critique about the car’s pricing in relation to the expected cost for muscle cars of this caliber. @dogsass reflected on a personal experience from the 70s, describing their previous Super Bee as a 'HORRIBLE' everyday driver during the gas crisis, suggesting that practical usability took a backseat to performance during that era. Additionally, @Strato58 raised questions about the absence of standard hood hinges, hinting at the impracticality of the design.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bigfootyeti found the vehicle beautiful and simple, expressing that it needs nothing more. @TedLitvin remarked on the amazing history of the 914 with its well-documented service records and how he still enjoys his own 914 today. @Jimmyblues1959, who owns a scale model of the car, shared his love for its classic styling, while @PorschesandCats appreciated the continuity of ownership, noting that the same owner had the car for over 50 years. The seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, enthusiastically highlighted the car’s exceptional condition and extensive documentation, showing confidence in the vehicle's value.
Neutral: Comments like those from @jlewis3323 and @madcow60 suggest that there are some areas of concern, including the left headlight not raising and a non-functional fuel gauge. @gssas60 mentioned the sending unit as a potential issue for the gauge, implying that repairs may be straightforward. @jasman pointed out that the hood crest added may have detracted from the vehicle’s originality and raised questions about the state of the headlights and gauge, while @jlewis3323 elaborated on the 'hell hole' rust risk due to its design and battery placement. The seller responded to these inquiries with a willingness to provide more details and assurance of the vehicle's overall care.
Negative: Some comments reflected negativity regarding the car's condition, such as @jasman criticizing the addition of the hood crest instead of addressing more significant issues like the non-operating headlight and fuel gauge. @madcow60 expressed curiosity about the necessity of manually lifting the headlight, hinting at potential underlying problems that should have been addressed. Additionally, @silverarrowcarsltd acknowledged minimal surface rust in the 'hell hole,' suggesting further work might be required to maintain the car's integrity. This feedback indicates concerns about the vehicle's maintenance and repair history despite its overall appeal.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 praises the vehicle for its gorgeous appearance and beautiful interior, highlighting it as a stunning example of the classic SL. @AmirShyam expresses satisfaction after taking the car for a test drive, noting that it drove remarkably well and had been well maintained for its age. @Jamies1 also appreciates the car's appearance, indicating a positive overall impression of its color and presentation.
Neutral: @dtmwtch raises a question about the differing presence of headrests in some models, leading to informative responses regarding U.S. regulations from @ScotterVT. @John-wade7 seeks clarification on the bidding currency, with @Dollycat3 and @bringatrailer providing insights about the auction's currency fluctuating based on location. @1000nutsnbolts reflects on the global demand for the vehicle, revealing a thoughtful discussion about logistics and costs related to cross-continental shipping.
Negative: @jamies1 inquires about unresolved advisory items and potential corrosion issues, highlighting concerns about maintenance despite the car's positive attributes. After discussion with @RussUK, it becomes clear that certain issues, such as corrosion needing welding, have not been addressed yet. Additionally, @1000nutsnbolts questions the rationale of selling to the U.S. market while considering the logistical and financial challenges involved, suggesting uncertainty about the car's competitiveness in an international auction.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's overall build quality and aesthetics. @StevieF praised the build and mentioned an upcoming spirited driving video, while @CanAmDan was impressed by the thoughtful design elements integrated into the vehicle, particularly referencing the '65 GT350 lower valence and '67 GT500 hood. @Pettyfan43 acknowledged the unique approach taken in customizing a 1968 fastback, praising it for standing apart from recent trends. Commenters like @FrontSeatDog and @Hoppy18 also remarked on the vehicle's beauty and overall fun aspect, indicating enthusiasm from potential bidders.
Neutral: Several comments reflected questions and curiosity about various aspects of the vehicle, indicating a desire for additional information. @Bobby21 asked about details on the paint and bodywork, while @rthirs inquired about restoration photos and information regarding the engine build. @OldGuy expressed a preference for the term 'restomod', suggesting an interest in terminologies used within the car community. @gonzocarz voiced skepticism about the seller's intentions, asking why the car was not receiving more bids and suggesting the seller may not be sincerely looking to sell.
Negative: However, the vehicle's auction has also drawn some criticism and concern from bidders regarding the seller's responsiveness and the car's features. @akeric noted a lack of engagement from the seller, which could deter potential buyers, while @gonzocarz remarked on the seller's silence indicating a lack of serious selling intent. @zavman (The Seller) attempted to clarify the situation by expressing that he drove the car regularly and answered questions as best he could, but he also mentioned limited knowledge about specific features, which some commenters found unsatisfactory. Comments regarding the automatic transmission, like that of @jadenh, also indicate some disappointment for purists who might prefer manual options.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Carbine123 notes that it's "another beauty on offer!", highlighting the overall appeal of the vehicle. @gscharnagl admires the aesthetic, calling it a "beautiful beast" and expressing a particular fondness for the color combination, while also complimenting the interior with its "sublime red BMW seats". Additionally, @aitalam, despite living in a hot region and typically not favoring black cars, is impressed, exclaiming "Wow! BlackBeauty indeed!" The seller, @michaelmotorcar, emphasizes the uniqueness of the car, detailing its low mileage, exclusive color, and a plethora of added features, making it an enticing bid for potential buyers.
Neutral: Several inquiries are made regarding the car's condition and features. @1wjosowski questions whether there are any visible imperfections on the car due to the lack of close-up pictures. In response, @michaelmotorcar assures interested parties that a walk-around video has been provided to demonstrate the vehicle's admirable condition without any scratches, dents, or dings. @Stosti asks about the existence of a backup camera, and @lutzup seeks clarification regarding the car's aftermarket parts and their origin, to which the seller responds with details about the car's original condition upon purchase.
Negative: Some potential buyers express concerns about the car's handling of mechanical issues. @Wiz1000 inquires about any faults with the car's sensors and replacements, while @1wjosowski raises the concern about whether the crank hub issue has been addressed. @hatrick2112 also areas of uncertainty regarding the completion of services and documentation. While @michaelmotorcar reassures that the car is in perfect condition with no mechanical issues and that maintenance was appropriately conducted before the sale, apprehensions remain about the car's full history and possible hidden issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LW2 praised the Hurricane Motorsports Roadster for its accuracy, noting that the molds were taken from CSX3235, which gives it a superior build compared to many other Cobras available. @Johnmo1492 mentioned that he has never had any issues with the engine, which has performed excellently since he first started it. He also highlighted the meticulous nature of his build process, using top-quality parts and ensuring everything was assembled correctly, making it clear that he cares deeply about the vehicle's quality and integrity.
Neutral: @Navymedic inquired about the vehicle's location and availability for viewing, expressing interest as a potential buyer. @fun-hog sought to understand more about the build process and the seller's background, indicating a strong interest in the specifics of the vehicle. @Johnmo1492 provided detailed context on purchasing and building the car, sharing a bit about the promotions offered at the time, the components used, and his hands-on approach to the project over several years.
Negative: @RGS68 asked about the driving experience and whether there had been any issues with the engine, reflecting some concern about the seller's past maintenance and usage of the vehicle. Additionally, @Johnmo1492 noted health issues and the challenges related to getting in and out of the car as one of the reasons for selling, which could suggest potential concerns for prospective buyers regarding the vehicle's accessibility.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Lfconte (The Seller) boasts about their ownership experience as the third owner of the coupe, mentioning that it has been a pleasure to own. They have taken meticulous care of the vehicle, having completed significant maintenance work including the installation of new Michelin Pilot tires, an alignment, an oil change, and a valve adjustment around 100K miles. Additionally, @Gmmuscleusa comments on the car's impressive black paint job, noting how well it shines and describing it as a very good-looking vehicle. Other users like @Secretariat19 agree, praising the color combination and overall appearance, suggesting that it has been well cared for, indicating a consensus on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: Several commenters are asking practical questions about the vehicle's condition and maintenance history. @aleinbach inquires about the reason for the subframe reinforcement, seeking clarification on whether there was an underlying issue or if it was simply a performance enhancement. @ba_reefer asks if paint depth gauge readings are available for inspection, while @eroglu requests additional photos of the rockers and subframe reinforcement area. @yhp2009 expresses concern over missing safety inspection records from the last four years on Carfax, indicating uncertainty about the vehicle's history during that time frame, prompting @Lfconte (The Seller) to reassure potential buyers that all inspections were completed annually in Massachusetts.
Negative: Despite the positive feedback, there are concerns regarding the vehicle's history and modifications. The mention of a hairline crack found by @Lfconte (The Seller) during an inspection raises questions about the vehicle's integrity and the necessity behind the reinforcement work. @ba_reefer's inquiry about paint depth readings hints at possible apprehensions about the quality of the repaint and any hidden issues beneath the surface. Moreover, the comment from @yhp2009 about the missing safety inspection records on Carfax creates a cloud of uncertainty around the vehicle's past, emphasizing a need for thorough verification from interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bgaller praised the vehicle's color combination, expressing enthusiasm with a 'great color combo' remark and wishing the seller luck with the auction. @MontanaBroncos expressed a personal appreciation for the Green Ranger and Avo interior, indicating a strong aesthetic connection. @rfrankov also complimented the colors and craftsmanship of the Bronco, hinting at hope for a successful sale during this third auction, referring to the vehicle’s history. @solidlifters echoed the praise, appreciating the colors while wishing for an AC system despite its non-original status, expressing a good luck sentiment as well.
Neutral: @Todd_Z. sought clarification from the seller about the radiator, noting a discrepancy between the description of an aluminum radiator and what appeared to be a copper/brass unit in photos. @highgeer pointed out an observation regarding the vehicle's plates, questioning the legitimacy of the Colorado plate and whether the photos provided were current, apart from those taken during refurbishment. @433JOHN (The Seller) clarified that the radiator was indeed painted black and confirmed that the front plate was decorative, addressing concerns about the registration and ensuring the authenticity of the images.
Negative: @solidlifters expressed a desire for the inclusion of an AC system, reflecting a sense of loss since it was not retained, stating it would have been a valuable addition. @433JOHN (The Seller) regretted that all AC components were entirely unusable, implying that the absence of AC was a missed opportunity for the vehicle's features. Overall, while comments were primarily positive or neutral, there was an underlying disappointment regarding the AC system's absence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, highlighting its stunning color combination and desirable upgrades. @Ngsd101 appreciated the 5-speed transmission as a great enhancement, while @Dollycat3 and @Rockwhite expressed that the car is breathtakingly beautiful. @BIY1905 noted that the car is enjoyable to drive, affirming its deserving upgrades, and other users like @70_duster and @MNberg agreed, pointing out the quality and allure of this E-Type. Overall, the comments reflect a deep admiration for the car's aesthetics and performance enhancements.
Neutral: Comments about the car's features and history provided additional context for potential buyers. @fj55mike discussed the car's European delivery based on its speedometer, while @DocMGL inquired about the AC compressor, suggesting the presence of some custom installations. The seller, @mbrandonmotorcars, confirmed that the car has extensive service records and mentioned potential videos to showcase its performance. Several users interacted with each other to clarify details about the engine rebuild and upgrades made to the vehicle over time, contributing to a sense of community among enthusiasts.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the passenger door alignment and potential body filler detected during a magnet inspection. @Drumond noted that despite previous work on the door, it still had closure issues, which prompted further speculation about possible underlying problems. Additionally, questions arose about the AC's effectiveness, with @italianelvis pointing out that the AC was not blowing as cold as before. The seller acknowledged these concerns, committing to address the AC issue. Other comments on the magnetic inspection results hinted at potential deficiencies in the car's condition that might deter some buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) describes the vehicle as a one owner, rust-free Southern Lexus with all service receipts available since day one, indicating a high level of care and maintenance. Another comment highlights the vehicle's excellent condition, noting it runs and drives like new at just 72k miles. @neilpierson25 shares a personal positive experience with a similar model, expressing confidence that this vehicle has plenty of life left, suggesting reliability and durability.
Neutral: There are clarifying comments about the vehicle's drivetrain, with several commenters, including @sheba214 and @sgardella1, correctly identifying it as front-wheel drive. @marinto80 requests clarification in the description regarding the vehicle's two-wheel drive status, indicating that potential buyers are looking for clear specifications. @TD911 inquires about the possibility of videos being posted, showing interest in more visual information about the car.
Negative: Some concerns have been raised about the vehicle's limitations, such as @kie suggesting that the front-wheel drive configuration could lead to transmission issues sooner compared to all-wheel drive models. @TheMightyGK seeks confirmation about the lack of heated seats, hinting that some expected features may be absent. Overall, there appears to be a general awareness of this vehicle's capabilities and potential shortcomings.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters have expressed their admiration for the Citroën DS, highlighting its comfort and distinctive design. @70_duster noted it as one of the most comfortable cars of all time, while @snafuracer appreciated the car's attractive color and comfortable seating. Others, such as @spinnetti, @DanOlson, and @DSCitroen, complimented the vehicle’s clean lines, vibrant color, and its reputation, with one citing over 300,000 miles traveled in a similar model and deeming it the best car ever owned. Additionally, @jgdunton praised the seller for the fantastic job done on restoring the D Special, indicating a strong positive reception from potential buyers and enthusiasts alike.
Neutral: Comments from users like @CComet and @Olivier145 focused on specific questions about the car’s features and repairs. @CComet inquired about the suspension overhaul described by the seller, which @mmartin clarified involved replacing suspension boots and rebuilding cylinders, confirming the thoroughness of the restoration. Additionally, inquiries regarding a spare tire and the condition of interior panels were made, reflecting a neutral interest in the vehicle's functional aspects rather than solely its aesthetic appeal. Other comments addressed historical comparisons and the idiosyncrasies of the Citroën designs, providing insights into both the car's heritage and its modern relevance.
Negative: On the downside, some concerns were raised about aspects of the vehicle's restoration. @MARTY_ROTH expressed surprise at finding duct tape used over the zipper on the air intake shroud, suggesting that it detracted from what was otherwise an exceptional restoration. @mmartin acknowledged this issue and admitted to the oversight, indicating a lack of attention in that area. Furthermore, @Olivier145 and @Chapron noted minor discomfort regarding specific features, such as the ease of replacing the steering wheel, showing that while the car is generally well-regarded, there are still areas that potential buyers may find lacking or in need of further improvement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster praised the vehicle's impressive LS2 and six-speed manual upgrade, expressing their excitement. @Fenceguy68 noted the car’s appealing old school stance with its oversized rear tires, mentioning how it looks and sounds great. @Curvette1 reminisced about wanting a car like this in high school, suggesting that the current upgrades make it even more desirable. Multiple commenters, including @danoncanon and @MartyKC, expressed admiration for the car's upgrades, calling it a 'hot car' and an 'awesome Camaro'. @Fnname (The Seller) confirmed a positive experience owning the car for 11 years, emphasizing that it’s meant for fun cruising rather than being a show car.
Neutral: Commenters had differing opinions on the car’s interior condition. @BloodDragon questioned whether the interior was simply dirty or in need of reupholstering, to which @Fnname (The Seller) admitted that the interior was dirty but not in need of full reupholstering. Some discussions revolved around the vehicle's specifications, with @WIZZZZ asking questions about parts replaced during the LS2 installation and overall functionality, while @Jimmy55 raised doubts about the paint job and body condition. @Fnname (The Seller) clarified these points on multiple occasions, indicating that he was actively engaged with the feedback.
Negative: There were some critiques regarding the interior and paint job. @Jimmy55 expressed skepticism about the quality of the paint job due to observable overspray and missing screws, questioning the overall condition of the body. While @MartyKC suggested detailing the interior might increase final auction prices, @BloodDragon's inquiry about the interior indicated concerns about cleanliness rather than structural integrity. @Fnname (The Seller) acknowledged the need for more cleaning but maintained that the car is a strong driver-quality vehicle compared to show cars.
![]() |
29k-Mile 2021 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off-Road Double Cab 4×4 V6
3TMCZ5AN0MM427711
Lot 240964
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Alpozsoy (The Seller) expresses gratitude to bidders and highlights the vehicle's pristine condition. He mentions that the Taco has been well-maintained, with no issues or repairs needed other than routine oil changes. The upgrades have been professionally installed, and he assures potential buyers of its excellent condition and reliability for camping and overlanding purposes.
Neutral: Several commentors, including @Tcurrent and @Georgie123, ask about the vehicle's mileage and lien status, indicating curiosity and some concern about the vehicle's backstory. @Soquelcreek raises important questions regarding the ownership history and any possible issues, referencing the Carfax report showing three previous owners. @benreddy and @oldfartcruiserguy delve into specifics about the truck's modifications and history, seeking clarity on the inconsistencies they noticed in mileage reports, which suggests a level of scrutiny among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arise from @oldfartcruiserguy and @benreddy regarding the ownership and mileage discrepancies presented in the Carfax report, revealing potential red flags about the vehicle's history. They question whether the odometer reading could indicate an issue, mentioning various discrepancies and even discussing a possible odometer rollback. These comments reflect a cautious attitude from buyers who are wary of possible underlying problems with the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the Jaguar XK8 convertible's appealing features, such as its gorgeous styling, luxurious interior, and the smooth performance that fans of the brand appreciate. @RPFMotorcars (The Seller) emphasizes that this low mileage example is ready for enjoyment, especially with the upcoming convertible season, creating excitement for potential buyers. Enthusiastic responses like @JoeRocha's appreciation for the car reflect a positive community sentiment towards the vehicle.
Neutral: There are inquiries about specific details regarding the car, particularly its condition and maintenance aspects. @allen96 queries about the convertible top's condition, and the seller promptly confirms that both the top material and hydraulics are in good shape. Moreover, @Sam1355 asks about the car's history concerning smoke and pets, as well as its smog compliance, which is also addressed satisfactorily by the seller who provides reassurance about the vehicle's cleanliness and recent passing of the CA smog test.
Negative: No negative comments were noted in the feedback provided. Instead, all inquiries and remarks from community members were relatively neutral or positive in nature, focusing more on information-gathering and expressing appreciation for the vehicle rather than voicing any concerns or complaints.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the vehicle's impressive features and potential driving enjoyment. @Frida praises it as a nice Euro 1978 Porsche 928 with a powerful 4.7S engine that should be fun to drive, and expresses excitement to see driving videos. @Warrenlu (The Seller) shares that the car has been meticulously rebuilt and highlights the pleasure of the driving experience, indicating that it performs excellently.
Neutral: Several commenters engage in discussions about the car's specifications and historical context. @vansters notes the rarity and desirable features of the vehicle, while @doublebarrelny provides insights on production numbers and features of early models. @Teutonic shared their experience restoring a 1978 model, emphasizing the importance of enjoying the car over just maximizing resale value. However, comments reflect varying perspectives on its market value given its modifications.
Negative: Some comments raise concerns regarding the condition and originality of the vehicle. @doublebarrelny mentions that the car has been modified, with critical components like the engine and seats being replaced, which might affect its value compared to original models. @Lilboy21, while appreciating the car, echoes the concern about its market value due to these changes. Furthermore, various comments point out minor issues like missing parts and a non-functioning mirror, indicating a lack of pristine condition in certain areas.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed great enthusiasm about the vehicle, highlighting its unique and appealing color, Malachite Green Metallic. @Spinwell noted that the color looks particularly striking in the sunlight, while @John_Rockwall_Tx praised the seller for consistently presenting wonderful wagons. Additionally, @carelallen enthusiastically showed support by simply stating, "Like it, like it, like it!" Overall, there is a clear appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic and rarity, with multiple users wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: The seller, @Vic, provided clarifications regarding the vehicle, noting that it is not the same car as one previously auctioned and that it was repainted at some point in its history. @turtleturtle asked thoughtful questions about the painting history, and Vic responded with details about the repaint. On the logistics side, @dbaumiller expressed concerns about shipping costs to the East Coast, while @syncrosurf suggested a straightforward solution by proposing to drive the car back.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns that detracted from the vehicle's appeal. @Autotistic criticized the quality of the car's photographs, suggesting that the photographer's skills could be improved, citing misleading reflections in the paint due to a neighboring building. @ddlramon also inquired about the lack of air conditioning in the car, indicating a potential drawback for some buyers. These comments suggest that while the vehicle is overall well-liked, there are specific issues worth considering.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the vehicle's aesthetic, particularly the classic black and red color combination. @70_duster noted the appeal of the color scheme, calling it 'lovely,' while @Tobyallen mentioned that the 'black with red interior and wires just make the car 'pop' and is a classic combination.' Similarly, @RentaDucati described the car as beautiful and perfect for driving in California. Overall, the car is viewed as a fun and enjoyable vehicle to drive, with some calling it a 'blast' that evokes nostalgia each time one gets behind the wheel.
The seller, @GenauAutoWerks, provided insights into the car's maintenance history, emphasizing the significant investment made by the previous owner and the care taken to ensure its fine working condition. They offered details on the recent engine rebuild, new interior, and the overall driving performance of this vehicle. Many commenters showed interest in the seller’s promise of a cold start and drive video, which they believe will showcase the car's operational capabilities. The vehicle is positioned as a driver-level car, appealing to those who want to enjoy a classic without the stress of worrying about minor imperfections.
Conversely, some comments raised concerns regarding the car's condition and potential issues. @Manistee whimsically questioned the expected oil drips from the car, a known trait of vintage British vehicles, while @denismoi pointed out the need for a thorough cleaning of the engine bay, suggesting possible maintenance oversights. @flatcreeker and @Tobyallen mentioned the mismatched tonneau cover issue and its potential fit problems, expressing the importance of ensuring that such accessories align correctly. Additionally, @Carmeister noted the presence of grease on the suspension, calling into question the maintenance history of the car. These comments highlight the challenges and realities associated with owning and maintaining an older classic car.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters like @Dollycat3 express appreciation for the car's beauty, while @Bigleo praises it as one of the best offerings from the seller, stating that he wishes he hadn't purchased another vehicle so recently. The appeal of the 1959 Mercedes-Benz 190SL is evident, with @Alfetta70s recalling fond memories of a similar model owned by his father, labeling it as profoundly lovely. Additionally, @Fred32 admires the seller's courage in running a no-reserve auction, highlighting the trust in the car's value.
Neutral: Several comments reflect curiosity and requests for additional information. For instance, @Mmoscone suggests a driving video and cold start, while @siscocorsica requests photos of the chassis restoration, indicating a need for reassurance about the car's underlying condition. @MOSSMERC inquires about memorable experiences related to the vehicle's ownership, showcasing an interest in the car's history and story.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters raise concerns about missing information. @Joe_Xzavier questions the lack of air conditioning, and @siscocorsica expresses surprise over the absence of chassis photos, suggesting dissatisfaction from personal experience with restoration challenges in similar models. These comments illustrate potential apprehension among bidders regarding the vehicle's condition and the thoroughness of its presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express admiration for the car's aesthetic, particularly praising the Marina Blue color and the sound of the side pipes. @19671973corvette highlights the color as ideal for the '67 model, while @70_duster enjoys the side pipes' sound. The vehicle's status as part of a thoughtfully curated collection is emphasized by @plasticdr (The Seller), who notes that the collection reflects a deliberate and passionate approach to automotive enthusiasm. Commenters like @LLN88 also find the car gorgeous, and @stugottz echoes this sentiment, showing a strong appreciation for the vehicle's design.
Neutral: Comments like those from @C3Lee and @Shootnride reflect a desire for more information, such as details about the wheels and a clear photo of the trim tag. @C3Lee seeks clarification about the aftermarket wheels, considering their potential value before placing a bid, while @plasticdr (The Seller) responds promptly with the requested information. The interaction suggests that potential buyers are actively engaged and seeking more transparency about the car's specifications to make informed decisions.
Negative: Some comments express concerns or confusion regarding the wheels. @noisyboyz and @C3Lee question the choice of knock-off wheels instead of the expected bolt-ons for the model year. @Oldchevytruckguy recounts a personal experience that highlights the complications involved with wheel types, while remarking on the appealing appearance of the knock-offs. These concerns hint at a divide in opinions on modifications versus originality, which might influence potential bidders' perceptions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @genevamotorcars, provided a prompt response regarding the transfer case, confirming it is in good working order and recently checked, with no signs of issues such as shuddering or vibrations. Additionally, the dashboard leather has been confirmed to be intact without any bubbling or peeling, addressing a common concern for this vehicle type. They also offered to share a road test video, which adds transparency and can help potential buyers feel more confident about the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: Several users raised inquiries about the vehicle's past accidents and repairs. @Luckymann77 pointed out that the Carfax report noted two accidents, both involving the front end, and sought further details regarding the extent of repairs required. In response, @genevamotorcars elaborated that the first accident was considered minor and assured that there was no indication of significant paintwork beyond the bumper, which they would verify with paint thickness measurements.
Negative: User @eclou highlighted missing grill blades in the vehicle's pictures, prompting concerns regarding its aesthetic completeness. Additionally, the presence of multiple accidents reported by @Luckymann77 raises questions about the vehicle's overall integrity and history, making potential buyers cautious about past damages. This doubt is also echoed in requests for specific repair details, which may affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlighted the overall condition and appeal of the vehicle. @davidneidell (The Seller) described the car as being meticulously maintained, with features such as Space Gray paint and a Nappa interior. He noted that it looks practically new for a 12-year-old car, free from dents, dings, or rust, and praised the beautiful aesthetics. @willinma echoed this sentiment, appreciating the comprehensive representation of the vehicle through good photos and videos, and emphasized the dual personality of the car, which can be both a daily driver and a spirited performance vehicle.
Neutral: The conversations contained several inquiries and requests related to the car's documentation and visibility of certain features. @phoaddict asked for additional close-up pictures of the scuffed wheels, while @hopason inquired about the oil change history due to a potential mileage gap reported by CarFax. @marksaint also sought clarification on the implications of the vehicle’s Montana registration and received informative responses from the seller. @JoJoMa requested better-lit photos of the suspension, suggesting that there are varying degrees of interest regarding the details of the car's features.
Negative: A few comments raised concerns about the vehicle's maintenance history and registration status. @hopason mentioned the identified gap between oil changes, which could be problematic for the engine type in the car. Furthermore, issues about the vehicle's Montana title generated trepidation among potential buyers; however, @marksaint tried to alleviate worries by sharing insights from his own research. This leads to a sense of unease among some bidders regarding the credibility of the car's history and its perceived maintenance record.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AutobarnCollection has highlighted the excellent condition of the Land Cruiser, emphasizing its many upgrades and a clean undercarriage that has impressed many potential buyers. @MOssa and @TruckTruckGoose were eager to know about the A/C system, which was confirmed by @AutobarnCollection to eventually blow cold after testing. Other comments compliment the vehicle’s build quality and reliability, noting its solid documentation and well-cared-for history, with @fjlegends confirming its authenticity as a factory-built Japanese model.
Neutral: Some commenters have pointed out that the vehicle is a grey market import, which raises questions about its comparison to the NAS 80 models. @Krumby and @JohnMc5 discussed its prior listing, with the latter clarifying that this round of bidding has no reserve. The seller remains open to questions about the vehicle, encouraging interested parties to visit the showroom for a personal inspection, ensuring transparency about its condition.
Negative: Concerns have been raised by @PeterGallinelli regarding potential oil leaks and the lack of a compression test, which has not been conducted unless requested by a client. @mikecopros79 expressed skepticism about the vehicle's history and condition, noting inconsistencies in the construction and features compared to original models, and voiced doubts over prior collision history due to physical indicators. This has compounded some uncertainty among potential buyers about the vehicle's true state and authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the Austin Healey 3000 Mk1, with several users highlighting its beauty and elegance. @Daniel_H praises the car's colors and suggests that it is owned by a gentleman, reinforcing the image of class associated with the vehicle. @KWM3748 notes the intoxicating satisfaction of owning such a car, while @boaboyoz calls it an amazing specimen. The vibrant feedback from users indicates a consensus on the vehicle being a delightful classic, with @Jfreddowns expressing that it is one of the most beautiful cars listed, and @Chefgordiemac reminiscing about their past with British sports cars, indicating a nostalgic fondness for this type of vehicle.
Neutral: Several commenters have posed questions regarding specific details about the car and its restoration history. @DavidWhitney asked for more information about previous refurbishing efforts and the frame-off restoration mentioned by the seller, @GenauAutoWerks. There were inquiries from @masterofnon and @WHA22 about the British Motor Industry Heritage Trust Certificate and other components, suggesting a desire for verification of the car's authenticity and condition. Additionally, @SoCalDad and @Fastmotors requested clarifications about accessories like a tonneau cover and starting/driving videos, further indicating engagement with the auction.
Negative: A few negative sentiments emerged, primarily questioning the vehicle's history and restoration credibility. @masterofnon raised concerns about the lack of a British Motor Industry Heritage Trust Certificate to verify matching numbers, which might impact potential buyers' confidence in the car's authenticity. Furthermore, @pbf777 suggested that some Healey owners are selling due to aging out of the 'British Invasion' era, implying that there could be a decline in this vehicle's desirability as the original owners age. Overall, while the majority of comments are positive, these concerns highlight the cautiousness of some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered positive feedback from several users, including @Curvette1 who appreciates the car's aesthetics, and @Chefgordiemac who praises its updated look. @TheCritic highlights the comprehensive restoration and modification details, calling it a nicely modified car. The owner, @007DBS (The Seller), emphasizes the car's impressive performance capabilities with a new BluePrint Engine boasting over 400 horsepower and a dynamic torque output, making it enjoyable to drive in various conditions.
Neutral: Several commenters have engaged with discussions about specific features and modifications. @stage03 raised a question about the headers, leading to clarifications from @ettev15z about the stock nature of the exhaust manifolds. Furthermore, @007DBS (The Seller) provided in-depth insights into various restoration efforts, including the details about the new engine installation and the challenges faced with certain vehicle components like the tachometer and headlight doors. Others like @ettev15z offered additional suggestions about speedometer updates that could enhance the vehicle.
Negative: Despite the overall positive reception, there are some concerns raised about the vehicle's condition. @007DBS (The Seller) mentioned minor issues such as non-functional front cornering lights and occasional fluid leakage, which are typical in older models. While these concerns don't severely impact the car's drivability, they do indicate some residual maintenance needs after extensive restoration work. Commenter @Paw333 shared their experience with a previous Corvette, underscoring that emotional connection with such vehicles can vary, hinting that prospective buyers might want to ensure it fits their personal preferences and needs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Rianf1 appreciates the modifications made to the RnineT Racer, mentioning that the extra equipment addresses prior complaints about the bike, and he sees great potential in this particular model. He also emphasizes the value of the aftermarket components such as the suspension upgrades and how they enhance the ride. Moreover, @MickeyValentine expresses satisfaction with the engine guards, which he believes improve the bike's aesthetics and practicality, noting the high-quality photos that showcase the bike well.
Neutral: @ocelotfilm (The Seller) provides insights about the model's rarity and sales figures, indicating that the RnineT Racer was the slowest selling variant of the RnineT series and was discontinued after three production cycles. He estimates that only a few hundred of these bikes were sold in the US, reinforcing its status as a rare find. Dialogues among the commentators reflect curiosity and speculation about market trends and ownership statistics, as @ca1dirkid discusses the challenges in obtaining accurate registration data for the model in California, while offering rough estimates based on public datasets.
Negative: Some comments suggest lingering concerns regarding market value and ownership costs. @fastbimmers shares his regrets over selling a previously owned RnineT Racer, indicating a sense of loss in the community for these bikes. Additionally, @ca1dirkid points out the complexities of acquiring specific registration data, which hints at broader issues regarding the model's popularity and market presence in certain regions. This mix of regret and uncertainty surrounding the model's availability and collectability adds a layer of caution for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express enthusiasm for the vehicle, noting its impressive condition, particularly for its age and mileage. @Antec900 calls it "freaking dope," while @70_duster highlights its incredible maintenance and overall quality, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @JWHBOOMER adds that he thinks someone will be very pleased with this well-maintained CRX Si, indicating that its one-owner history is a significant selling point. The seller, @QOE-briley, shares personal stories of the car's reliability over the years, making it evident that this car has been cherished and is capable of enduring tasks like long road trips, which reinforces the overall positive sentiment toward the vehicle.
Neutral: Questions about the vehicle's functionality and specific features arise from potential buyers. @CivicDuty8735 inquires about the condition of the interior and exterior lights, as well as the sunroof's operation, to which @QOE-briley confirms they are all functional, though the sunroof occasionally requires assistance to close. @HondaEFowner appreciates the presence of original parts but also mentions typical maintenance aspects, such as the radiator and distributor's reliability. There’s also discussion about the repainting of parts due to a parking lot incident, which @QOE-briley clarifies with details, providing transparency on the vehicle's history.
Negative: Concerns about potential issues with the vehicle are raised but are met with responses from the seller. @evansline notes debris in the fender wells, implying a lack of detail in car care, and asks about hidden rust, to which @QOE-briley reassures that he found no rust during a thorough inspection. @JimiEH3 brings up a standard HVAC crack, prompting further dialogue about the vehicle's repainted sections. Other comments note the age of the car, with @Carrerachas highlighting fading cosmetic details. While these concerns are acknowledged, the overall impression remains that the car is largely well-maintained and reliable, underscoring a supportive community of enthusiasts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jelliott, the seller, introduces himself as an experienced car dealer passionate about providing quality vehicles. He emphasizes the unique features of this specific vehicle, including its turbodiesel engine, which is free from the complications of the Bluetec series, and its impressive condition with a rust-free history and low mileage. Multiple commenters like @Zoraspride and @Driven58 praise the vehicle's reliability, great design, and the seller's thoroughness in showcasing the car's condition, reinforcing the sentiment that this ML320 CDI may be one of the best models ever produced by Mercedes-Benz.
Neutral: The discussion around the vehicle includes technical inquiries and logistical arrangements. @P102767993m asks for seat height measurements, which @Jelliott promptly provides. @Driven58 expresses interest in viewing the car in person, indicating that he has visited the seller and finds the vehicle to be in excellent shape. Additionally, @BMWMBGUY queries about the car's inspection history, to which @Jelliott responds by explaining the care it has received and the service advisor's involvement in documenting its history.
Negative: Some comments bring up concerns regarding the vehicle's maintenance, specifically regarding the oil cooler seals, as noted by user @ACO2002 who points out that it's a costly repair if necessary. The price of diesel fuel is also mentioned by @Bigcreek, who notes its high price, which could deter potential buyers. Moreover, @olddatsun12 raises doubts about @Driven58's motivations for observing the auction, suggesting possible ulterior motives, which @Jelliott firmly defends against, emphasizing the community's spirit of discussion and transparency.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Lannis describes the vehicle as beautiful and worthy of just being driven and maintained, indicating satisfaction with its condition. @denny expresses a fondness for the car's color and states that it is fun to drive, showing enthusiasm for its aesthetics and performance. @LittlePieces appreciates the color combination and the gauge layout, inferring a well-thought-out restoration. @rvarge (The Seller) highlights the nostalgia associated with the MGA, noting that the car evokes fond memories for guests, and assures that it drives well and shows minimal wear since being displayed.
Neutral: @Mezz and @izlivz discuss the condition of the seat backs, pointing out that they are swapped and belong to a 'Deluxe' model, indicating that while the car is nice, there are minor issues to be addressed. @rossak mentions the rarity and quality of the 'Competition' or 'DeLuxe' seats in general. @LittlePieces inquires about the restoration and condition of the driver door, showing a balanced interest in the car without overtly negative comments. @hueyhoolihan brings up common fitting issues with MGA cars, suggesting a shared understanding of potential challenges without voicing frustration.
Negative: Several commenters raise concerns about the driver door's alignment, with @AZBritishcar and @BB510 questioning whether it closes correctly and pointing out that it might need adjustment. @hueyhoolihan notes that improper fitting of replacement quarters is a common issue with MGAs, suggesting that this may be a concern here. @BB510 further critiques the limited mileage since refurbishment, implying that the car may not be as roadworthy as claimed by the seller, highlighting a potential discrepancy in the selling narrative.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BayportLJ described the exhilarating experience of driving the GT3 home along the Pacific Coast Highway, noting the thrilling performance of the exhaust. @Wolfenhaus praised the vehicle's color, stating it looks stunning in natural sunlight, while @boaboyoz termed the car as 'wicked' and scintillating in silver. @Atomic80 expressed excitement about the car's performance, stating that whoever purchases it is in for an incredible ride, and @Avidjohn mentioned the seller's meticulous care for the car over the years. The overall sentiment was one of admiration for the GT3's aesthetics and driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarification on specifics regarding the car. @Gt3v10 questioned whether the wheels were original or changed, while @Hyecaresam inquired about the original build sheet and @viroskymania asked for information on an over-rev report. @Dryfly (The Seller) confirmed the car has a full paint protection film on the front end and mentioned the original exhaust is in perfect condition. Additionally, the seller provided resource links for the installed radar system, showcasing the car's high-tech integrations and maintenance status.
Negative: There were fewer negative comments, but some users expressed concerns about specific aspects. @EddieB. asked about the necessity of replacing the front inner wheel liners, hinting at potential issues with the car's upkeep, while @jmofo72 raised a question about the use of PPF on headlights due to potential heat concerns. Overall, these negative remarks were more queries than criticisms, reflecting a desire for transparency regarding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the Ford F-250 as a "fabulous" truck, describing it as beautiful in blue and complimenting the build quality. @markAdavis (The Seller) highlighted that the truck is not just a basic vehicle but rather a well-restored masterpiece, emphasizing its all-original steel and no rust repairs. He mentioned that the truck runs excellently and noted it has a rebuilt motor and transmission, essentially making it almost brand new with only 500 miles since restoration. Furthermore, he expressed a commitment to customer satisfaction, indicating that he can install an A/C unit if requested.
Neutral: Several commentors asked practical questions about the truck. @JSpecht inquired about the air conditioning, while @karlynel wanted to confirm the color and availability of the original metal door tag. @Cowgirlup24, @lookbothways, and @carstruck also requested specific videos showing the vehicle's cold start and exhaust sound, which @markAdavis (The Seller) agreed to provide, although he noted some difficulties in making these videos. @Cepd202 and @Todd_Z. discussed auction details, confirming it was a reserve auction.
Negative: Some feedback was less favorable, with certain commentors expressing doubt about the clarity of the cold start video provided by @markAdavis (The Seller). @carstruck specifically criticized the execution of the cold start video, suggesting improvements for future presentations. Additionally, @markAdavis (The Seller) acknowledged previous oversights, such as taking off the trim, indicating a need for better preparation for video demonstrations. There was also concern from buyers about specific features like A/C and the overall state of the vehicle's components.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Searle804 highlighted the car's stunning Chrome Orange color, noting that it truly stands out on sunny days and would enhance the cornering of the vehicle. @jz1999 (The Seller) described the car as extremely clean, with excellent condition starshield and overall a like-new appearance, suggesting that it has been well-maintained. Additionally, @a1harix shared their experience that the modified supercharger system is reliable, with parts widely available, making maintenance relatively straightforward.
Neutral: @jz1999 (The Seller) clarified that the car is currently not registered and the absence of a check engine light does not mean it will pass a smog inspection due to previous modifications like the removal of the upstream o2 sensor. @JD1212 mentioned an alternative for registration as a 'Classic' in certain states that could exempt emissions testing. @michaelp1usa inquired about the ease of maintenance for the supercharger, indicating there is community support available for tunings and repairs.
Negative: @mphjr raised concerns about the vehicle's registration and its possible inability to pass emissions tests in its current state. @speed.house questioned the age of the tires, hinting at a potential safety hazard if they were indeed installed over a decade ago. @mrrabbit expressed uncertainty regarding the clutch, asking if it is still stock and what the horsepower would be, indicating a lack of clarity about the vehicle's performance capabilities.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @kgishere praises the vehicle's appearance, specifically highlighting the appeal of the proposed modifications, including putting back the front and using Rotiform steel wheels with Falken AT4w tires. @prefecture appreciates the inclusion of the original frontend, noting that many don't keep the original look but commending the seller for preserving it. They also admire the unique color described as Pearlite Gray Metallic, referring to it as somewhat of a unicorn spec, which indicates strong interest in the bidding process.
Neutral: Many technical questions are raised by potential buyers, with @Marshall15 asking about the size of the AMG fender flares that were swapped and questioning the condition of the spring perches. @DJW131 is interested in a video showing the functionality of the locking differentials. @StephenK seeks information regarding the headliner around the sunroof, showing that potential buyers are engaged and want to thoroughly understand the vehicle's condition before bidding. The seller responds promptly, providing details and requesting further commentary to clarify potential concerns.
Negative: @HatchMotors (The Seller) addresses comments that highlight potential concerns about prior modifications, mentioning that the headliner may have issues due to spray adhesive use. They also report on the potential confusion regarding the factory trailer hitch, as it is not confirmed on the VIN decoder. @Marshall15 expresses doubts about the steering wheel controls being compatible with the replacement radio, suggesting some adjustments may need to be made, indicating potential limitations in the vehicle's modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express a general enthusiasm for the C5 Z06 vehicle, highlighting its historical significance and performance achievements. @fiveomar argues that this model will continue to appreciate in value due to its lightweight construction and remarkable capabilities, such as setting records for the fastest Nürburgring time at its launch. @gk1994tx appreciates the combination of the Fixed Roof Coupe's aesthetic and the open-air experience that comes with the Targa top, calling it "the perfect C5." Additionally, @Eaauto1 praises the startup and driving video of the car, suggesting that it runs well and is in good condition overall.
Neutral: Some comments focus on seeking clarification and more information about the vehicle, especially concerning the Targa roof conversion and its impact on chassis rigidity. Several users, including @J.B.2.1 and @Dsparks74, ask for more pictures and information about the car's appearance with the roof removed, expressing curiosity about how the mod affects structural integrity. @Mazak23 mentions that the Targa conversion was offered as a kit, which suggests that there is some level of community behind this modification, even if opinions vary on its necessity or benefits.
Negative: Concerns are raised about the quality of the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding the engine compartment, paint job, and potential mechanical issues. @Tobyallen criticizes what appears to be a poor spray job, stating it undermines the Z06's platform, while @Bakker16 points out various visual imperfections and even questions whether there are fluid leaks indicative of a larger issue. @CaptJack22 mentions the importance of checking for debris in the cowl area, indicating a potential concern for new owners about maintaining the vehicle's performance and integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @thebarnmiami (The Seller) describes the 1974 Volkswagen Type 2 Bus as a vehicle suitable for various uses, including as a promotional piece for businesses like food trucks or event branding. @Kustomkat1950 expresses admiration for the bus and shares a personal sentiment about missing their own high roof camper. Furthermore, @jschroed7 confirms that late model VW buses can serve as daily drivers, sharing experience from their plumbing company, which utilized these models reliably in Chicago.
Neutral: @Rialbay inquires about the rear bench seat, hoping it folds into a bed, while @Volks1303 shares their preference for Volkswagen's original color palette, particularly regarding the taillights' design. @JWHBOOMER asks about the vehicle's cruising speed, and @thebarnmiami (The Seller) responds that the owner reports it can cruise on the highway at 60-65 mph. Additional comments include technical inquiries about the exhaust and possible imperfections in the vehicle's epoxy floor.
Negative: @mpb raises concerns about the exhaust, noting an unusual casting of sealant on the pipes that lacks clarity. @Dittypop questions the condition of the epoxy floor, asking if it is cracked and for better pictures. Similarly, @Amskeptic suggests that the heat management method used on the exhaust pipes could lead to overheating issues, indicating a lack of certain components in the engine area.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Collectibleclassics has garnered a positive reputation as a high-volume dealership, highlighted by their impressive Google Reviews score of 4.8 out of 5. They emphasize their commitment to providing unique and desirable vehicles and assure buyers of smooth and transparent transactions. They also offer a comprehensive suite of services including expedited shipping, registration assistance, and various car upgrades, which further enhances customer satisfaction. Overall, many comments reflect trust in the professionalism and dedication of the dealership in handling their transactions.
Neutral: @Moe2635 raised specific questions about the vehicle's condition, asking whether the rear window leaks and the costs associated with potential repairs. @Collectibleclassics responded promptly, informing that there are no leaks currently and that the rear glass could be replaced for under $1,000 or the entire top for about $2,000 if desired. This exchange illustrates that prospective buyers can acquire detailed information directly from the seller, allowing them to evaluate the vehicle's condition adequately before making a purchase.
Negative: No negative comments were noted regarding the vehicle or the selling process. The responses from @Collectibleclassics and the overall nature of the comments leaned toward reassurance and satisfaction, with no indications of dissatisfaction or complaints being evident in the auction dialogue.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its design and rarity. @racerboy221 remarked on its nice sporty appearance, highlighting its unique 3-Pedal feature. @ajakejyt described it as one of their 'grail cars,' indicating a strong desire for ownership. @SAABNUTT expressed affection for the rare SAAB, mentioning they would use it daily, and @Carmalarky appreciated its appealing colors and rare model specs. @EstateSale also expressed a newfound desire for the car upon learning about its configuration, calling it very cool. Overall, these comments reflect excitement about the vehicle's desirability and features.
Neutral: Some comments focused on the vehicle's performance and service history rather than overt praise or criticism. @graphmark commented on the driving experience of the Sport Combi and inquired about mileage intentions. The Seller, @Shoot08, shared insights about the ECU replacement, which cost around $1850, and its common issues due to placement. @EstobanMcQueen and @dacost contributed technical suggestions regarding ECU temperature management, while @Joe-D asked about service records and rust signs, indicating practical concerns about maintenance. These neutral comments reflect a mix of curiosity and informative exchanges regarding potential ownership.
Negative: There were indications of some challenges related to maintaining the vehicle. While discussing the ECU replacement, @esaabparts pointed out that parts availability can be tricky, noting the seller overpaid for the ECU and emphasizing the need to know where to source parts. @Shoot08 acknowledged uncertainty about the Haldex oil change in the service records and mentioned lack of access to inspect certain areas of the car. Additionally, concerns regarding potential rust were raised by @Joe-D. Overall, these comments highlight some issues potential buyers should consider when contemplating this vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the craftsmanship and quality of the vehicle. @59turner highlighted the unique details that set it apart from typical hot rods, indicating that there's a sense of individualism that makes the car stand out. @MichaelRyerson also appreciated the stance and running gear, describing the car as a well-balanced build perfect for cruising. Additionally, @fbenefiel shared a positive history with the vehicle, indicating it is well-loved and built to last, while @Cammergalaxie just stated it's a very cool ride, emphasizing the joy of summertime cruising with it.
Neutral: Several neutral comments focused on specifics relating to the vehicle's specifications, maintenance, and history. @RPO-Z16 (The Seller) clarified details regarding the tire sizes and their condition, noting that they likely remain from the car's initial build in 2013. There was also mention about the car title and possible discrepancies regarding its history, with @bj74cruiserguy asking for clarification about the title date and prior ownership, which @RPO-Z16 addressed. @hbjacket pointed out the confusion in ownership timeline between the comments made and the seller's information.
Negative: However, not all feedback was wholly positive. @59turner pointed out minor issues with some of the wire wrap wires on the brake disks, marking them as easily fixable but worth mentioning. @loggdon noted that the car might be on the smaller side, potentially uncomfortable for larger drivers. Furthermore, @RPO-Z16 acknowledged small imperfections in the car's paint job, mentioning minor cracks and touch-ups that, although hard to see, could detract from its overall appeal. @100Jesse questioned any additional issues that may not have been disclosed, reflecting a common concern among prospective buyers.
![]() |
454-Powered 1966 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe 4-Speed
136176A165762
Lot 241031
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @MLWheaton finds the car reminiscent of the movie 'Talladega Nights,' suggesting it has a fun and exciting spirit. @70_duster echoes that sentiment with a playful remark about competition, indicating they view the vehicle as sporty and appealing. @twb930s appreciates the car's design, comparing it to a famous build with advanced aerodynamic features, while @boaboyoz describes it as a 'bodacious build' and an attractive option for buyers, wishing the seller good luck in the sale.
Neutral: @WIZZZZ raises various technical questions regarding the car's specifications, such as the clutch, rear gear configuration, and potential modifications, which suggests a curiosity about its performance capabilities. @the_4spd asks for clarification about the engine type and transmission model, indicating the importance of accuracy in performance specs for potential buyers. @Sfortier17 also inquires about various engine details and condition questions, showing a thorough interest in understanding the car's features and status, while @SkootersDad suggests looking under the vehicle to confirm the material of the transmission housing.
Negative: @JKNAK makes a humorous but potentially concerning comment about illegal activity, possibly detracting from the car's reputation. @WIZZZZ's requests regarding inoperative elements, such as the radio and AC, highlight potential issues that may need addressing, potentially raising concerns among serious buyers. @Sfortier17's numerous detailed inquiries about the car's condition reflect potential worries regarding repairs and operational difficulties, which could influence buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement about the vehicle, noting its impressive modifications and performance capabilities. @Fauxshowpony described it as 'clean and mean' and predicted it will do well at the auction. @djlk mentioned that if they had the garage space, they would own the car, highlighting its desirability. @sblmnl appreciated its track usage history, with the seller confirming solid lap times from previous owners, further boosting its appeal. @Frank_Barrett emphasized the rarity of GT-Rs for sale and the expectation of rising prices, indicating a general consensus that this vehicle is a valuable and attractive offering.
Neutral: The seller, @barrettautogroup, provided comprehensive information about the car, including details about modifications, maintenance, and legalities regarding smog testing. They specified that while it is currently non-compliant with California emissions, they are willing to assist in making it compliant for a California buyer. Additionally, they clarified that the vehicle has not been neglected and is part of their active fleet, having been well cared for and regularly driven. They offered insights into its history of usage in marketing events and track days, which added depth to the potential buyer's understanding of the car's condition and performance history.
Negative: However, some concerns were raised by commenters regarding the vehicle's condition and modifications. @Puppymonkeybaby questioned the need for a wrap and suggested it might hide body repairs, while @bigsexyx5 expressed reservations about the car's history on the dealer lot. @Puppymonkeybaby and others sought transparency by asking for paint thickness readings and details on the build's longevity. The seller addressed these inquiries but acknowledged the limitations of providing certain details, like paint thickness readings due to the wrap. Overall, these comments reflect skepticism from potential buyers, emphasizing the need for clear communication and reassurance about the vehicle's integrity and modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments highlight the extensive maintenance work that has been performed on the vehicle by @wicked501, including the replacement of critical components such as cam phasers, timing chains, oil and fuel pumps, spark plugs, and ignition coils. @wicked501 also mentions the installation of brand new Nitto tires, indicating that the truck is in great condition and ready for the road. Many users, like @Dairyman, agree with @wicked501's assessment of the truck's interior, which is praised for being one of the best designs Ford has ever produced, adding to the overall positive sentiment about the vehicle.
Neutral: @wicked501 engages with potential buyers by responding to various queries about the truck's performance and specifications. @johnny0620 asks for a dyno sheet, to which @wicked501 explains that the vehicle has not been dyno-tested but estimates it produces around 400 horsepower to the tires. These neutral exchanges provide essential information, reassuring potential buyers about the truck's capabilities while also discussing the performance parts and their current configurations.
Negative: Concerns about the truck’s longevity are expressed by @jamest89, who questions its lifespan at 150,000 miles. @wicked501 responds by indicating that the engine could last between 200,000 to 300,000 miles with proper maintenance, suggesting that while the truck has had significant work done, it could still face issues if not properly cared for. Although not overly negative, this comment reflects some uncertainty regarding the vehicle's future performance, indicating that it may require careful ownership moving forward.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @UncleBaldy praised the vehicle, stating it is done to perfection with nothing overlooked. @Chamba expressed a similar sentiment, calling the car beautiful, while @70_duster highlighted the iconic lines of a '57 Chevy. @boaboyoz commented on the attractive spicy red color and nice build of the 210, wishing good luck with the auction. @mike_rockwell discussed the Tri-5 designations, noting that the car is a well-done resto-mod, making it clear that the vehicle's modification was executed superbly. Overall, many comments reflected a high level of appreciation for the car's aesthetics and build quality.
Neutral: @jpk80 asked about the specific model of the car, reminiscing about owning a 210 with a pillar between windows. @donnitd provided clarification, explaining that two-door 210s were available as either a sedan or a hardtop, contributing to the information about the car's specifications. @wannabid55 and @marvmt engaged in a discussion about the vehicle's VIN representation and its implications for the model designation. @Old-school1963 also inquired about potential issues with the car, including electrical or drivetrain concerns, and expressed interest in driving videos, indicating a curiosity about the vehicle's performance.
Negative: @tml's comment was flagged by other users as non-constructive without providing further detail, indicating a negative response to the comments or discussion surrounding the vehicle. @evofxdwg expressed concern over the images of wood seen in the undercarriage pictures, worrying that it might be part of the car rather than tools used for lifting, which raises questions about the vehicle's condition. Additionally, @CaptJack22 addressed the seller directly but commented about their absence, implying a delay or lack of engagement that might frustrate potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the vehicle, particularly noting the impressive features and performance of the Porsche Cayenne. @Colo_Lee mentions it has a twin turbo V-8 engine, Sport Exhaust, and a high-quality Burmester Stereo system, providing both power and an enjoyable driving experience. Several commenters, including @Kiawah997 and @911c4s, agree that any concerns about the vehicle's PSCB (Porsche Surface Coated Brake) issues are overblown, citing minor squeaks that are hardly noticeable. The overall response is enthusiastic about the car's capabilities, from its ability to sound great at high speeds to the luxurious features like heated steering wheel and seats.
Neutral: Some commenters seek clarification on various aspects of the Cayenne, including its maintenance history and tire condition. @PennyJean and @Onlychild8403 inquire about the installation of the PPF (Paint Protection Film) and battery replacement, showing interest in the car's upkeep. @CottageCheese and @sprinter pose questions regarding the air suspension and tires, hinting at common concerns for Porsche enthusiasts around maintenance and reliability. @Paul-K's comment about the PPF wrap hints at a need for detailed inspection, which @Colo_Lee addresses with a candid response, demonstrating transparency in the auction process.
Negative: A few comments express concern and skepticism regarding the vehicle's condition and maintenance. @Calli74 mentions hearing ticking noises during a startup video, prompting requests for additional footage to ensure there are no underlying issues. @CottageCheese raises questions about potential rattles and problems with the air suspension, while @teambrd seeks updates on @Calli74's inquiries about the exhaust sounds. Additionally, @sprinter's mention of the necessity to change all four tires simultaneously due to potential AWD system damage echoes apprehension among prospective buyers about the vehicle's handling. Overall, there seems to be a cautious approach to the vehicle's auction, balancing enthusiasm with scrutiny.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is generating excitement among commenters, with multiple users expressing admiration for its unique features and design. @mhemsley called it a "cute car" and wished luck with the auction, indicating a favorable impression. @oldwrench54 noted its appeal as a "great little grocery and attention getter," highlighting its charming personality that may attract potential buyers. Additionally, @patrickcolord emphasized the car's impressive fuel efficiency of 40 miles per gallon, which is quite appealing considering rising gas prices, suggesting it could be an economical choice for buyers.
Neutral: Commenters are engaged in playful banter regarding the vehicle's theme and references to pop culture. @usdcrs and @McFood joked about the vehicle's connection to the "Infinite Improbability Drive" and its capabilities to travel to fictional destinations, while @David_P questioned the color and graphics scheme in a way that suggests familiarity with its origins. @gbzausa raised a practical question about the decals, and @patrickcolord confirmed that they can be removed, indicating responsiveness to buyer inquiries and adding a layer of utility to the car's appeal.
Negative: Despite the positive and neutral comments, there were some pointed criticisms regarding the condition of the vehicle. @canuk357 urged that the damaged seats should be recovered, which could be a concern for potential buyers regarding the car's overall condition. The mention of speed by @oldwrench54 brought up a potential discrepancy, with a suggestion that the car might only be able to reach 40 MPH on highways, which contrasts with @patrickcolord's claim of a top speed of 73 MPH. These comments indicate some skepticism about the vehicle’s performance and condition, possibly deterring some interested bidders.
![]() |
27k-Mile 2017 Ford Mustang GT Premium Convertible 6-Speed
1FATP8FF1H5310973
Lot 241045
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has generated a lot of enthusiasm from @Ematz24, the seller, who actively engages with potential buyers. @Ematz24 has expressed willingness to answer any questions about the Mustang and also wishes everyone a happy weekend, reflecting a friendly and approachable demeanor. Their effort to provide additional content, such as videos of the car, indicates a commitment to transparency and showcasing the vehicle's features.
Neutral: In response to a request from @HeatherHill, @Ematz24 agreed to provide a driving video of the Mustang, showing openness to fulfilling buyer requests. @Ematz24 later mentioned that they added two videos to the listing, including a cold start and a drive-by, to enhance the listing further. There is a note that a previous comment mistakenly included a picture instead of a video, showing minor confusion in the communication but overall responding to inquiries in a timely manner.
Negative: While @Ematz24 seems eager to share more about the car, the need for better videos suggests that the initial visual content might not have been sufficient to meet buyer expectations. The unclear communication regarding the earlier comment about a picture indicates a lack of attention to detail that might leave potential buyers wanting more clarity. The reliance on finding someone to help with video capturing could be seen as a limitation, reflecting challenges in providing the comprehensive multimedia experience buyers often look for.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @afmuro72 highlights the vehicle's features including a one-year extended warranty, new Continental tires, upgraded braking components, and aesthetic enhancements with original parts included. The vehicle is praised for achieving 30 MPG, which is impressive for its size, and its unique color is mentioned as a point of distinction.
Neutral: There are inquiries from potential buyers regarding specific features like the adaptive cruise control and heads-up display, to which @afmuro72 confirms the absence of these features and directs them to the previous listing for further details. The seller also clarifies modifications made to the air suspension system, ensuring that it has not been significantly altered and operates well.
Negative: Concerns are raised by @jfh333 regarding the modifications to the air suspension system, questioning the necessity of such changes if the original system was functioning properly. Additionally, @afmuro72 acknowledges the existence of an open recall but reassures that a local dealer inspected the vehicle and found no issues regarding its safety.
![]() |
Original-Owner 2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser Trail Teams Special Edition
JTEBU4BF3BK114292
Lot 241043
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle, a rare FJ Trail Teams model, has garnered high praise for its condition and history. @Lastonepromise noted its rarity due to limited production caused by the tsunami, emphasizing its resilience against rust. @K7bowers, the seller, proudly shared that the truck has spent its life garaged in Arizona, adding to its appeal. Fans like @skl48 expressed excitement for outdoor adventures, while @Tigers196884, who owns a similar model, shared his satisfaction with owning the FJ, highlighting its strong value retention and timeless appeal.
Neutral: Some comments requested further information about the vehicle's history and condition. @EnjoyOneLife asked for a detailed description of repairs made to the driver's door, indicating interest in the vehicle's maintenance history. @K7bowers responded candidly about the incident that caused the door's damage, clarifying that it was repaired well and noting that there are no visible signs of past damage.
Negative: A few comments displayed concerns about affordability. @jimintx expressed frustration, acknowledging the truck's appealing features but lamenting that it would sell for more than they could afford. Still, they wished the seller good luck with the sale, reflecting a mixture of desire and disappointment.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed excitement about the condition and features of the 1991 Chevrolet K5 Blazer. @bschneids83 praised the listing and requested videos, while @dougl33 and @AutoOverload commented positively on the Blazer's appearance and build quality. @GCEA confirmed that the vehicle is in great condition, operates smoothly, and is set to provide an enjoyable bidding experience for potential buyers, suggesting that the K5 Blazer will be a great fit for its next owner.
Neutral: Several questions regarding the vehicle's features and specifications were raised by commenters. @Arthur1 inquired about the exterior dimensions, and @chuck-k asked if everything functions correctly. @Assam also asked about the engine modifications, while @Crossrdtulsa461 wondered about the state of the engine and exhaust. The seller, @GCEA, efficiently replied to these inquiries, providing clear details about the vehicle's measurements, functioning parts, and specifics about the engine and modifications, indicating that the seller is engaged and responsive.
Negative: Despite the overall positive comments, some concerns were addressed. @Thunderuppaul expressed worry based on previous experience with oil leaks in a similar model, prompting @GCEA to clarify that this K5 Blazer shows no signs of leaking oil and that the undercarriage is notably clean. @Crossrdtulsa461 also noted a lack of detailed information on the engine rebuild, to which @GCEA responded that the engine appears to have been refreshed at some point but lacking documentation for confirmation, indicating a slight lack of clarity regarding the vehicle’s history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @2002WS6 praises the 2003 Toyota Solara, highlighting its reliability and performance, stating it runs exceptionally well with high mileage. @Damifino329 describes the vehicle as a beauty in wonderful condition, sharing their own positive experience with a similar model. @amotorsports (The Seller) notes that the car has been maintained properly and provides an inspection report which shows that essential services like spark plug replacement and fluid changes have been performed, indicating the car should be a solid choice for the next owner.
Neutral: Questions about the vehicle have been raised, such as @Simplyredspyder asking for maintenance records on the timing belt and water pump, indicating a careful consideration from potential buyers. @CORVETTEJOHN inquires about the boot cover for the top when it's down, and @switchon4go humorously asks about the car's color, which @Sunny102 promptly clarifies is "Absolutely Red". @doogie51 suggests that the timing belt should be replaced due to the car's age, echoing concerns about its maintenance.
Negative: @Simplyredspyder expresses concerns about the timing belt and water pump servicing, while also questioning the repainting of the left-hand door and bumper. These inquiries indicate potential worries about the vehicle's condition. @doogie51 further emphasizes the likelihood of needing to replace the timing belt based on age rather than mileage, suggesting caution for future buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commentators expressed their admiration for the vehicle. @Racecars commented that it looks like a low-stress daily driver that would be fun, and @JLsKA510 stated their love for the car while wishing good luck with the transaction. Other comments appreciated the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, such as @Craig13 praising the car's design and license plate, and @boaboyoz describing it as a delightful example of a Maryland 442 Holiday Coupe. The @CRD7327 (The Seller) seamlessly engaged with these positive remarks, thanking them and sharing additional details about the car's history.
Neutral: Several comments focused on technical inquiries and requests for more information regarding the vehicle. @vettevet99 questioned the functionality of the A/C system due to a missing belt and whether it was still charged, prompting @CRD7327 (The Seller) to confirm that the A/C is intact though not currently in use. @moparmanbet also requested information about the operation of various features such as lights, heat, A/C, wipers, and the radio, to which @CRD7327 (The Seller) responded with updates on those features, indicating the radio might just need a fuse. Interestingly, @RossHeller raised a question about the power output of the engine, which @CRD7327 (The Seller) clarified was indeed 325 hp, aligning with factory specifications.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns and indicated a need for further clarification on the vehicle's condition. @ap1 expressed curiosity about the historical installation timeline of the spoke wheel covers. More specific questions came from @Sfortier17, who inquired about vital aspects including rear axle specifications, the condition of the tires, and whether various gauges functioned properly, as well as requesting detailed visual evidence of the car's undercarriage. Additionally, there were comments about the car's A/C having a leak, with @CRD7327 (The Seller) acknowledging this issue, which may deter potential buyers. Overall, there seems to be cautious interest reflecting a desire for comprehensive transparency regarding the car's mechanical state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its overall condition and the fact that it features the original paint, specifically the desirable glacier blue color. @AAAMOTORCARS (The Seller) emphasizes the truck's quality, stating that it looks, runs, and drives as close to new as possible. Many potential buyers appreciate the seller's openness to inspections, indicating trust in the vehicle's integrity and construction, which fosters confidence in its overall appeal and reliability.
Neutral: Several inquiries regarding the vehicle's condition were made, particularly concerning the paint and potential leaks. @jglg expressed interest in determining whether the paint has been affected by any past incidents, while @GFuggitt asked about any leaks from multiple parts of the truck. @AAAMOTORCARS (The Seller) addressed these concerns, assuring that the vehicle has original paint and no leaks, which may help to calm any worries from potential buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive remarks, some concerns linger about the vehicle’s history, particularly regarding accident damage as highlighted by @jglg. The absence of detailed accident information raises doubts about the trustworthiness of the vehicle's history, prompting the need for inspections. @GFuggitt's question about potential leaks further introduces a cautionary aspect to the discussions, suggesting that some prospective buyers may have lingering uncertainties about the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the vehicle's original condition and classic charm. @Ebifurai described it as an "Honest rig" while @jmo308 referred to it as "Perfect as is", illustrating appreciation for its authenticity. @Shawh praised the vehicle as an "Absolute workhorse", emphasizing the enjoyment of its patina and history, while @Dollycat3 complimented it as a "Beautiful original California black plate beauty". @Bajabronco noted the attractiveness of the Poly Gold patina and its suitability for country living, pointing out the vehicle's purposeful design. Furthermore, @binderbeast expressed excitement about the rare find, acknowledging its original state and potential as a lasting project with some rust issues needing attention.
Neutral: In response to the comments, the seller, @Chapter2, provided insightful details about the vehicle's history, manufacturing background, and current condition. They addressed various inquiries, such as @Laborboy's request for historical context about International Harvester trucks, covering the company's origins and production milestones. The seller also confirmed features of the vehicle, including the 5-speed manual transmission's possible original status, along with updates about maintaining the truck's functionality. Additionally, @milesm22 suggested uploading videos to provide a better view of the vehicle's running condition, which the seller acknowledged as a good idea, noting that while the truck requires some service, it runs smoothly.
Negative: On the flip side, there were some concerns about the vehicle's condition, particularly regarding rust. @binderbeast rightly pointed out that rust around the windshield needs to be addressed to ensure longevity. @neilpierson25 humorously criticized the gas tank placement as potentially hazardous, raising safety concerns. @pausum56 expressed interest in the vehicle's line setting and sought more detailed information about the 5-speed transmission, indicating a desire for clearer documentation. Overall, while many appreciate the truck's aesthetic and heritage, there is a recognition of the necessary improvements to enhance its longevity and safety.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @MikeyLost70, the seller, shows enthusiasm and pride in presenting this 1st Gen 4Runner, describing it as a labor of love. He shares his extensive experience with vintage Toyota vehicles and expresses hope that potential buyers will enjoy the auction and the detailed photo gallery. Commenter @Estorial3m praises the truck's condition despite its 244k miles, while @Giblet admires its overall appeal, indicating a strong interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: @MikeyLost70 mentions that there was no significant rust when he replaced the fender flares and describes the extensive cosmetic restoration carried out on the truck, including a detailed paint job. He explains the limitations of the vehicle for long-distance driving due to its age, suggesting caution for potential buyers considering cross-country trips. Other commenters like @Westfalia_Will and @Tomek2020 appreciate the truck's capabilities and envision using it for trips, but also probe into its performance and reliability.
Negative: Commenter @RMCustom expresses concerns about potential rust and mechanical issues commonly associated with the vehicle's age and model, particularly regarding the notoriously problematic head gaskets in the 3.0 V6 engine. The need for comprehensive service records and thorough mechanical checks is emphasized, as potential buyers may be apprehensive about making long-distance journeys without addressing such issues first. @MikeyLost70 responds, attempting to reassure bidders that the truck has been well cared for, but acknowledges the need for care when undertaking long trips.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @VintageMotorCarsUSA (The Seller) responded to inquiries with clarity and assurance, stating the vehicle is 2WD, and confirmed that there have been no issues with leaks, which reassures potential buyers regarding the integrity of the truck. Additionally, @VintageMotorCarsUSA noted that the truck is as great as it looks, which creates a positive impression about its condition and appearance. Furthermore, the seller provided additional photos of the chassis and mentioned being available for further questions, which adds a layer of transparency to the auction process.
Neutral: Several commentors, like @nanexp and @Needatruck97, asked for clarification on the vehicle's drive type and auction format, respectively. Both inquiries were handled by the seller, who accurately provided the requested information. @tmazza89 raised specific concerns about the vehicle's undercarriage and exhaust, while @Scott313 echoed those concerns, highlighting a collective interest in the truck's physical condition. The seller responded to each of these points, aiming to alleviate concerns by confirming that there are no problems with the control arm or the exhaust and asserting that the undercarriage does not appear wet due to any issues.
Negative: Despite the positive reassurances from the seller, concerns were raised by multiple commentors regarding the appearance of the undercarriage in the photos. @tmazza89 noted a potential issue with the control arm and a possible hole in the exhaust, while @Jalen59 specifically pointed out the wet appearance, suggesting it could be rust prevention spray. @Scott313's comment about the undercarriage looking 'wet' further questioned the vehicle's condition and raised red flags for some potential buyers. This indicates that despite the seller's attempts to clarify, certain aspects of the vehicle's presentation have caused concern among viewers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @LegacyGraphicDesign reminisced about seeing the movie 'Vanishing Point' as a child and expressed a lifelong love for the Challenger, praising the car and wishing the seller well on their auction. @Mike9000ft called the Challenger 'very nice' and @Starship-Shuttle described it as 'the absolute best example of a Challenger RT' seen in decades, commending its color, condition, and options. @HemiEddie426 also complimented the Challenger, encouraging the seller to provide photos of various stamps to help potential buyers appreciate the vehicle more.
Neutral: @Kerry1 and @BG440 inquired about specific stamps and whether the fender tag was present, while @Cuz requested a fender tag photo. @moparelkhart asked for clarification on whether the engine and transmission were original, suggesting a cautious interest in the auction. @Smooth68136 and @Rolltidericky requested further details and media about the car, indicating they were eager for more information before making decisions.
Negative: @Chip55 pointed out a discrepancy regarding the power antenna, noting it was not mentioned on the window sticker while the listing claimed it did not work. @moparelkhart expressed concerns about the nature of the engine's original status since the transmission had been replaced. @ViperACR speculated that the rear wing might have been added later, suggesting it wasn't part of the original specifications, which questioned the vehicle's authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @goldenfury56 expressed interest in the vehicle by inquiring whether it can be shipped, indicating their serious consideration of making a purchase. This shows that they find the vehicle appealing enough to want to finalize the transaction despite their geographical location.
Neutral: Several comments from various users discussed general aspects of the vehicle without strong feelings either way. They mentioned details such as price and condition, weighing the pros and cons but not expressing definitive opinions about their liking or disliking the vehicle.
Negative: Some users raised concerns about the vehicle's price and condition. They commented on potential issues that might deter a buyer, including maintenance history and reliability, which could be red flags for prospective buyers.
![]() |
49k-Mile 2004 Ford F-250 Super Duty XLT Crew Cab Power Stroke 4×4 FX4
1FTNW21P24EE00369
Lot 241075
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is highly praised for its condition and features. @OwnGoalLM10 (The Seller) highlights that the F250 is a low-mileage California car, emphasizing its lack of rust and non-smoker status. The presence of a valid smog certificate further assures potential buyers. The truck is equipped with modern enhancements like a Pioneer head unit featuring both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which has generated interest among commenters, including @Alextex9191 and @Onlyoriginalonce, who are familiar with high-quality California owned trucks.
Neutral: Several commenters have engaged with @OwnGoalLM10's responses regarding the truck's features and maintenance history. @LWBmore raised a valid question about whether the vehicle has been bulletproofed, to which the seller replied that while it has not been bulletproofed, the truck is still in great shape with a solid mileage. The seller also provided reassurances that previous maintenance records could be found, clarifying that not all records are reflected in CarFax, indicating that further evaluation may be necessary for some buyers.
Negative: Despite the positive aspects, some concerns remain regarding the vehicle's maintenance history. The lack of detailed service records on CarFax has raised questions among potential buyers, particularly from @LWBmore, who sought more information about crucial bulletproofing service for the 6.0 engine. The seller acknowledged these concerns but maintained that the maintenance records submitted were accurate. Some buyers may still be hesitant due to potential uncertainties surrounding the truck's past care.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Noahsdad mentions that these bikes are great for casual riding or for vintage/classic competitions. @mr_mike recalls his experience from 1979, praising the bike's motor and stability at speed, highlighting its performance attributes. Sellers like @Flhxdave add to the discussion by showcasing the engine's strength with videos, indicating a well-maintained vehicle.
Neutral: @corpforce1 agrees on the bike's aesthetic appeal, noting a personal attachment to a 1978 model, but expresses concern about the absence of a standard chrome tank possibly affecting its resale value. @Johnmccoyitaly comments on the bike's durability, suggesting that the wear from muddy conditions is acceptable and that the bike is meant for enjoyment rather than preservation.
Negative: Some concerns are mentioned about the effect of the painted tank on value, with @corpforce1 feeling it lowers the bike's worth, despite @Flhxdave's defense of its grip advantages. Additionally, @Johnmccoyitaly implies that the bike's condition might not withstand rough usage, which could deter potential buyers looking for a pristine collector's item.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed appreciation for the bike's condition and originality. @JOE486 described it as sweet and even cleaner than their own bike, while @bob7430 noted its impressively clean state. @tsager referred to it as possibly the best bike from the '70s, highlighting its combination of handling, performance, and simplicity. @whatizpb complimented the difficulty of finding bikes like this that have been well-maintained and emphasized the importance of keeping it stock and clean.
Neutral: @Donutz101 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the bike, reassuring potential buyers about its originality and condition. He confirmed that the engine is original with matching numbers, and while the previous owner rebuilt the top end, he does not have receipts for the work. He also offered assistance with shipping arrangements for the buyer and reassured interested parties that the bike is running excellently. Additionally, he answered inquiries about the oil pump and the pistons with specific details.
Negative: There were some concerns and inquiries regarding the bike's maintenance and modifications. @thecurtster questioned whether the motor had been rebuilt, expressing caution given the high mileage. @lapsrus warned based on personal experience that modifications can negatively impact the bike's performance, suggesting it’s best to keep it stock. Similarly, @Carmen214 inquired about paintwork on the bike wheels, indicating a potential concern about its original finish.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Montana296 (The Seller) highlights the motorhome's great driving experience, mentioning that it fits well in various spots like restaurants. The seller emphasizes the vehicle’s excellent condition, compared to newer models, and states that it is the best 24-foot motorhome available on the market. Furthermore, the motorhome includes a large Starlink installation for connectivity, a king-size bed, and a control panel operated by a phone, enhancing convenience for the user.
Neutral: Responses mention inquiries about the motorhome's specifications such as average mpg, interior height, and available accessories like leveling blocks and spare tires. @onehussler and @Alan3422 posed relevant questions regarding the drivetrain and included features, while @Montana296 (The Seller) provided detailed answers that covered the vehicle's attributes and functionalities, clarifying the accessibility of the bathroom with the slide in a closed position.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments directly addressing drawbacks of the vehicle. However, some respondents expressed concerns about specific features such as the stability of displays while driving, with @BlackthorneM questioning if the issue was due to the phone use or the motorhome's handling. Overall, the feedback appears largely favorable without any serious complaints about the motorhome's performance or condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed strong enthusiasm for the vehicle, highlighting its impressive condition and nostalgic appeal. @Luv2Travel noted the car's cleanliness and how it fit most of their wish list, while @jdemeter mentioned enjoying the same wheels on their own NSX and praised the overall ownership experience. @Oldhockyplayr reminisced about their time with an NSX and admired the car's handling and appearance that still draws attention today. @boaboyoz referred to the car as a "superb specimen," showcasing the high regard for this particular model. Further, @Everydayguy2020 emphasized the car's combination of supercar appeal and Honda reliability, aligning with the overall positive sentiments surrounding its performance and maintenance.
Neutral: Some comments were more neutral, discussing the car's history and condition without strong emotional language. @Toptime79 shared that the vehicle has an interesting bidding history and noted its good modifications. Comments highlighted the car's decently maintained state, with mentions of PPI reports illuminating its current condition. For example, @NSXR1953 brought up concerns related to the potential repaint of the front end while acknowledging the car’s clean undercarriage. @Alan1010 asked about the maintenance history of the vehicle, seeking clarifications on specific details, but didn’t express particular fondness or discontent. Overall, this feedback reflected a pragmatic interest in the vehicle's specifics more than sheer admiration.
Negative: A few comments contained concerns or questions regarding the vehicle's condition. @NardoGrey and @NSXR1953 queried about the paint meter readings, implying possible previous paintwork, which could be a red flag for serious buyers. Additionally, @DG-Collections mentioned a desire for more information on the replacement of certain hoses, suggesting that while the car appeared well-maintained, there were aspects that could be improved. @AlfaGTVR raised a question regarding the production of the transmission in relation to known snap ring failures, indicating some apprehension about the mechanical reliability of the model. Although these comments did not seem to detract significantly from the overall appeal of the vehicle, they highlighted areas of caution for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @legend, presents the 1988 Mercedes 560SL in an appealing manner, highlighting its beautiful Blue Black Metallic color and well-maintained Gray leather interior. The seller emphasizes their commitment to transparency by providing documentation of recent services and ensuring potential buyers that they can arrange vehicle transport. Additionally, the positive interactions with commenters suggest that @legend is engaging and helpful, responding promptly to inquiries and correcting errors, such as the DMV mistake regarding the car's color.
Neutral: Commenter @AJS01 raises valid points about the vehicle's low mileage, questioning whether the odometer may have been inoperable at times. The seller clarifies that the odometer is currently working. There are inquiries about the air conditioning, with the seller admitting that it is not currently functional but has taken steps to resolve the issue. Questions from @forsure17 about the car's history, its radio functionality, and the accuracy of the mileage indicate that potential buyers are keen to understand the vehicle's condition and any caveats before making a purchase.
Negative: Some comments reveal concerns about the vehicle's history, particularly regarding the Carfax report, which shows only around 100 miles added in 21 years, prompting questions about whether the car was in storage or had a broken odometer. Commenter @mliuzzi expresses apprehension about the vehicle’s accurate mileage status, while @5phited5 wonders about the HVAC system's issues that have yet to be diagnosed. Additionally, @mrorange444 asks about the absence of a hardtop stand, which reflects on the completeness of the vehicle's offered accessories.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @johnsorr expressed excitement for a video demonstration, highlighting the rarity and beauty of the 6-speed manual Cayenne GTS. @70_duster supported the preservation of manual cars and wished the seller well. @Diamond_Dave also praised the car, noting its great package and local availability. The seller, @Jelliott, dedicated time explaining their deep connection with the vehicle and shared plans for multiple videos, emphasizing the excitement of owning a manual version of the Cayenne GTS. This personal touch resonated well with potential buyers. He also actively engaged with commenters to address specific requests and inquiries, like sharing cold start and suspension videos, creating a strong community interaction.
Neutral: The comments reflected a blend of inquiries and practical insights regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @saynotoelectricsteering asked for paint meter readings and any A/C odors, both of which @Jelliott addressed promptly, confirming there were no odors. Local buyers like @Dfcarlso and @tlopdx expressed interest in viewing the car in person and got replies confirming willingness to meet. @vonyves raised concerns regarding the car's prior TMU status and requested clarifications about records relating to clutch wear and other maintenance details. @Jelliott provided detailed responses, promising to reveal findings from the upcoming service visits, thereby reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the authenticity of the vehicle's manual transmission. @jgriffith57 pointed out discrepancies in the build sheet and queried whether the car had been subject to a manual swap. @Magdaddy provided insights about potential confusion in transmission identification based on VIN data and expressed the rarity of manual conversions. These concerns led @Jelliott to clarify the vehicle's history, asserting that it is indeed a factory 6-speed GTS and sharing service documentation to back up his claims. However, there remains a degree of skepticism that the seller is actively working to address with detailed information and proofs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have praised the Classic Auto Air climate control system installed in the vehicle, indicating that it works effectively with the top on, providing excellent cold air. @BDJeff emphasizes the system's efficiency, having had it installed in his own 308, stating it fits well and serves as a good investment. Additionally, @Chrismanogue, the seller, confirms it was designed to improve airflow compared to the original system. The installation of the 328 center console has also received favorable comments for enhancing the vehicle's aesthetics, with @Lhigley mentioning he didn't mind the upgraded console but would eventually restore it to the original due to its traditional appeal. Overall, the car is seen as clean and well-maintained, garnering attention for its classic design and driving experience.
Neutral: Several comments have raised questions about specific components and maintenance needs for the vehicle. @Sncstr sought clarification about the climate control installation and its impact on the engine compartment and interior, while @Dsexson requested verification about potential misalignment issues with the front hood. A few contributors, including @RobThePorscheMan and @spudlyone, showed interest in understanding the reliability and performance of timing belts, with some suggesting that they could lead to engine damage if not replaced. There are also inquiries about the availability of original parts, like the steering wheel and other factory-installed components, which appear to have been altered.
Negative: Some commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's modifications and potential need for maintenance. @mike_747 noted that the provided invoices for repairs lacked clarity, raising doubts about the extent of completed work. @nero308qv criticized the absence of the original steering wheel and the current replacement, labeling it as unsuitable. Additionally, @DNN71 sought assurance regarding visible wiring issues, indicating discomfort with the modifications on the passenger side of the dash. Lastly, @mike_747 reflected on the earlier models not having sticky buttons, which could indicate wear and tear associated with the car's age, and there were mentions of maintenance costs that could add up significantly, causing potential apprehension for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong admiration for the low mileage of the vehicle, with @Clhauto noting its astonishing 835 miles as 'holy cow' and @soulmc calling it 'super nice and crazy low miles.' @fuhrmanr described it as a 'gorgeous example' while @tmz1m remarked on its potential auction value, drawing an insightful comparison to potential stock market gains. The overall consensus is that this vehicle is a rare find, with @muwka highlighting its possible status as 'the lowest mileage specimen in the world.' Moreover, fans like @nhienja conveyed their excitement about the opportunity to add mileage to such a well-preserved car.
Neutral: Some users took a more measured view, discussing the implications of the car's condition and history. @jaxn sounded ambivalent about the car's usage, contrasting it with their own experience with their vehicle. There were inquiries about the car's preservation, such as whether it was stored properly while @s219 expressed curiosity about the vehicle's backstory, prompting the seller @khart to provide some details. Commenters like @Snake500 pointed out the recurring theme of financial judgments regarding such low-mileage cars, sparking debates about car ownership and investment, implying that both driving for enjoyment and preservation for collection are valid choices.
Negative: Skepticism emerged from various comments, particularly concerning the practicality of owning such a low-mileage car. @tmz1m lamented that the car was not driven as intended and discussed potential depreciation, sparking a wave of responses about whether collectors should drive their vehicles. @nwpantera echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the car is likely to be 'caged' rather than enjoyed on the roads. Furthermore, @soquelz expressed concern about the implications of the car sitting unused for so long, indicating that extended storage without regular driving could lead to issues, thus raising questions about the vehicle's future use.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, calling it an incredible homage to the legendary Porsche 959, with @dfromhein going as far as to say he would take it over iconic models like the F40 and Carrera GT. @expletive pointed out that it looks super cool and appears to offer tons of fun, while @jcgoodlett2 highlighted the exceptional build quality and how well it performs off-road. Others, like @One_for_the_Hill, praised it as one of the best 959 replicas they have seen, and @silverarrowcarsltd, the seller, appreciated the energy surrounding the listing.
Neutral: Several comments indicated curiosity about the vehicle's specifications and history. @SlamBop asked numerous questions regarding the fuel cell capacity, compression tests, suspension, and smog regulations, while @milage brought up an intriguing discrepancy related to the engine choice. Additionally, @eugeneej inquired about its street legality, showing that potential buyers are interested in practical details. @HB92647 reminisced about childhood memories associated with a 12th scale Tamiya RC version of the car, suggesting a nostalgic connection to the build.
Negative: While there were many positive comments, a few users expressed skepticism or disappointment. @SlamBop's questions included concerns about the vehicle's tach gauge functionality and its history regarding an accident that led to its being totaled, indicating uncertainty about the car's reliability. @1porsche_geek noted a personal wish for the car to be a 959 instead of a replica, which might imply a lack of satisfaction with being a replica rather than the authentic vehicle. The concerns from commenters like @HeavyTank77 about the cost of maintaining the authenticity of the experience versus the price also highlighted negative sentiment towards the idea of replicas in general.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlight the excellent condition of the vehicle, particularly the interior detail. @DrJacquesStrappe remarked on the impressive detail work saying it looks better than new and mentioned the vehicle's performance, noting the appealing power-to-weight ratio of 189HP. The seller, @choicedealsnc2017, also reassured potential buyers that the car drives amazingly and that the tires are in excellent condition with at least 70% tread life remaining.
Neutral: Questions from potential buyers reflect various concerns regarding the vehicle, including inquiries about service records, the presence of any odors, and the state of the keys. @rg25 sought clarification on key quantities and requested a driving video, to which @choicedealsnc2017 agreed to provide. @Husbandofabrit and @Demoner1 asked about the emissions status and the service lights, respectively, with the seller promising to address these points shortly.
Negative: Despite some positive feedback, potential buyers expressed concerns about the service lights and the overall inspection of the vehicle. @Demoner1 specifically inquired about the service lights being on and requested additional details on the tires, indicating a level of apprehension regarding the car's mechanical condition. There was some frustration evident in follow-up inquiries, as @Demoner1 stated they were looking forward to answers regarding these issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mick59 praises the vehicle with enthusiasm, stating 'Keep on Buggin!' while @Big_DaddyRL compliments its condition, remarking that it looks as if it just rolled off the assembly line from Wolfsburg, Germany. @Volks1303 describes the car as a 'Beautiful Beetle,' suggesting it would be fitting to enhance its appearance with a dash bud vase holding a tulip, considering its 1965 model year and location in the Netherlands.
Neutral: @NoahWellington expresses curiosity about a particular detail in the car, inquiring about a 'beautiful red button underneath the dash', indicating a desire for more information. @Pfeil acknowledges the seller's note that the vehicle features a 1966 1200 engine, highlighting this as a significant benefit due to its advanced components. @Josix also shows interest in the vehicle's maintenance history, asking if there is an invoice for engine work completed in 2019, which @LindemanJR (The Seller) assures is available, alongside an accompanying photo of the invoice.
Negative: A slight disappointment is echoed by @NoahWellington, who notes that while the bug is beautiful, it would be great to hear more from the seller to address the growing number of questions, suggesting that enhancing communication could boost interest. Additionally, @schportskarr humorously references the red button as possibly being for an 'ejector seat,' which, while lighthearted, could imply skepticism about the car's features not being explained thoroughly.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has garnered a lot of admiration from commenters for its aesthetics and historical significance. @ukracer described it as 'gorgeous,' while @skosieruxo appreciated the rarity of the 4-speed model. @Mike_Breinin emphasized its stunning appearance as a prime example of an Avanti with the R2 engine and 4-speed transmission. @flyinphil pointed out the importance of Mike Meyer's work reflected in the receipts, which lends confidence to potential bidders. Overall, commentators have expressed excitement about the vehicle's restoration and its 'exceptional condition.'
Neutral: Multiple commenters, including @Raffi and @AuthenticAuctions (The Seller), have engaged in detailed discussions about the vehicle's specifications and production details. @Raffi noted the unique traits of the specific model, such as the placement of the side mirror and features that might indicate its early production status. @AuthenticAuctions covered key restoration facts and the vehicle's ownership history. Additionally, @retrostude suggested that having the production order from the Studebaker National Museum would enhance the car's value and appeal. There’s ongoing curiosity about the original and current color, which @flyinphil and @Raffi discussed regarding their experiences with the car's paint.
Negative: Some comments indicate concerns about aspects of the vehicle. @NaturopathicDoctor requested clarification on possible corrosion under the trunk liner, which @AuthenticAuctions responded to by assuring there was only light surface rust that could be cleaned up. @steveremick shared personal preferences, indicating dissatisfaction with the interior color, while other commenters noted inconsistencies, such as the absence of a limited-slip differential in the car's specifications. Overall, while the car has many positive traits, some individuals raised questions and expressed preferences that could affect the bidding process.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The GL450 SUV is being presented by @aSingh39 with confidence, emphasizing its beauty and encouraging potential bidders to engage with the seller. Many comments highlight the vehicle's clean appearance and good condition, with @SuperTrkrE2812 expressing interest in acquiring it for relocation to Florida, further affirming the vehicle's appeal. @aSingh39 has also made an effort to provide clear and helpful responses to queries, including posting additional photographs for potential buyers to view more details about the vehicle.
Neutral: Discussions around the vehicle’s registration raised some important considerations. @Frank_Barrett pointed out that the vehicle is titled in Montana despite being located in Pennsylvania, whereby other users, like @SebastianMax and @catcitybob53, engaged in a debate about the legality and implications of this setup. Additionally, several commenters requested further clarification on the nature of Montana registrations, demonstrating a mix of curiosity and concern among potential buyers regarding the purchasing process.
Negative: On the downside, some comments brought up concerns regarding the vehicle's condition, such as potential issues with the leather on the front passenger seat mentioned by @SuperTrkrE2812. Additionally, discussions related to the Montana title sparked debate over tax implications, with some commenters like @SebastianMax using strong language to describe their views on state laws, indicating a level of frustration with the legal complexities surrounding vehicle registration. This discourse might deter some prospective bidders anxious about legal intricacies.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters express confidence in the vehicle's driving performance. @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) mentioned that the car drives amazing, is smooth and straight, and has functional air conditioning. Additionally, they highlighted that driving videos showcasing the performance would be released soon, indicating a positive driving experience.
Neutral: Questions regarding the vehicle's condition are prevalent, particularly about the discoloration of the rear side windows. @TommyB-1123 raised inquiries about this issue, to which @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) responded that they received the car in this condition without any clarity on the cause. @Bug36T57 added that similar discoloration is found on the front wing windows as well, reflecting ongoing uncertainty among potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's history have also been noted, especially regarding its emissions status. @mhemness pointed out that the Carfax report indicated a failed emissions inspection in 2023 without a subsequent passing attempt. However, @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) assured them that the car currently passes emissions tests, addressing some worries but leaving lingering questions about its past maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have praised the vehicle, highlighting its exceptional condition and the care it has received from the current owner, @sarbehkg. @Cal_Wade referred to it as an "excellent example", while @jamesgomezjr called it "a beaut!" Additionally, @CICBarkeep noted the high quality of the detailing and service records that this example offers. Other users like @hjohnson and @silverstate91 remarked on the car's undervaluation and how well it has been taken care of, suggesting that potential buyers recognize its true worth. @BenzLver expressed sadness over the car's sale, acknowledging the substantial work put into its maintenance.
Neutral: @sarbehkg, the seller, contributed to the conversation by addressing various questions and comments from interested buyers. He confirmed that all door latches function correctly and that the hydraulic trunk assist and soft-close mechanisms are in perfect working order. He provided insight into the vehicle's care routine, noting that he kept the leather in good condition and the vehicle garage-kept its entire life. The seller also offered additional information about the vehicle's Bluetooth integration and the operational status of seat massagers and dynamic seat functions, further highlighting the car's features.
Negative: There were some concerns raised about common issues with models like this one. A user mentioned the "negative folklore" surrounding W220s, implying that such reputations are often undeserved but can influence buyer perceptions. @sarbehkg acknowledged this, mentioning that much of the negative reputation stems from neglected examples and emphasizing that a well-maintained S55, S600, or S65 retains its value and appeal. The seller's comments suggest that while there may be negativity associated with W220s, this particular vehicle defies such stereotypes due to its meticulous maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Tyracious praises the bike for its appealing back-dating and notes that it could be improved further with a colored airbox. He emphasizes the rarity of an original back seat by Honda and concludes by calling it a great bike, showcasing admiration for the bike's aesthetic. @stugottz describes it as a "modern machine with classic styling," expressing enthusiasm and commending the bike's design with an emoji, while @Cheth20 compliments the color, accompanying it with a well-wishing note for the seller.
Neutral: @CorvairGA inquires about the fuel tank's condition, while @discoganya asks for clarification on various aspects of the bike, including the maintenance and potential issues with the paint. Their questions reflect a genuine interest in the bike but do not indicate strong opinions either way. @jmilo53 expresses curiosity about the condition of the VIN, and various commenters ask for more information about other aspects like the stock exhaust and fork seals, indicating a desire for thorough understanding.
Negative: @sls4me raises a concern that the bike may not pass inspection in some states due to the aftermarket exhaust, suggesting that a stock exhaust would be necessary. This comment points to potential legal or functional obstacles for prospective buyers. Additionally, @frogmanjake expresses skepticism about the accuracy of the information regarding part availability, hinting at possible misinformation that could affect buyers' decisions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle's tasteful build and classic design. @jjwithers noted the bike's charming 'Star Wars' fairing and praised the color, although he queried about its accuracy between video and photos. @eldonchas also emphasized the quality of the bike, stating it was a great improvement over the original design. @ChillyWilly12 commended the bike's beauty and the modifications made, suggesting the price is quite reasonable, implying it could have been sold for more. @SteveIOMTT appreciated the craftsmanship of the custom seat, which was confirmed to have been made by the seller.
Neutral: There were several inquiries about the bike's original parts and the modifications made. @Bobsbikes asked if the seller retained all original parts, and @Paul_Allen requested a comprehensive list of included components with the conditions of each. The seller, @restomod101, confirmed that all original parts are intact, and they took care to preserve the bike's integrity during the build process. Additionally, @R65LSguy shared a personal connection to the bike, suggesting it could potentially be the same model he owned, while @Paul_Allen was interested in seeing photos of the original parts.
Negative: A few comments pointed out aspects that could be considered as critiques. @airheadearl expressed his belief that the bike might have benefited from a monolever design, indicating a preference for a different stylistic choice. While not directly negative, this sentiment hinted at some dissatisfaction with the bike's current configuration. Overall, the commentary was mostly positive, with only a hint of critical opinion regarding certain design choices.
![]() |
CEN BR6 Armored, 131-Kilometer 2025 Lincoln Navigator L Reserve 4×4
5LMJJ3LG4SEL10999
Lot 241112
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: @Vintage1956 expresses a nostalgic appreciation for the vehicle, implying that it embodies a grandeur associated with the Lincoln legacy, though humorously noting its impracticality for Abe Lincoln's time. This sentiment resonates with those who value the historical significance and luxury of the brand, while @Bschurr provides an informative comment on the uniqueness of the vehicle, sharing a link that adds context and background to the discussion, further enhancing the perception of its desirability.
Neutral: @Excursion asks a clarifying question about a term used in the conversation, showing engagement with the topic without expressing a strong opinion. @Mr_White raises a practical inquiry regarding the vehicle's importation to the US, focusing on logistical details rather than on the vehicle's merits or flaws, indicating that there is interest in the vehicle’s applicability across borders. @RSB-Scottsdale contributes to the discussion by discussing the necessary paperwork for importing the vehicle, which adds practical knowledge to the conversation.
Negative: @Batman1961 chimes in with a skeptical remark about the vehicle's historical relevance, implying that it wouldn’t have been practical in its original era. The comment suggests a more critical view of the vehicle's relevance today, casting doubt on its functional use for government purposes compared to modern alternatives. @RSB-Scottsdale's mention of costs and potential bureaucratic complications concerning the import of the armored vehicle hints at the challenges buyers may face, underscoring a negative aspect of ownership.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the overall positive appreciation for the vehicle, especially from @Gumbo, who describes it as a 'Silver Bullet' suggesting it is visually appealing. @DaveinGigHarbor shares a personal connection, stating they prefer driving the RS4 over a more expensive Carrera, emphasizing the enjoyable driving experience. @george1234 appreciates the Alcantara steering wheel and commends the presentation of the car, indicating a strong visual and aesthetic appeal that many find attractive.
Neutral: Several commenters express neutral inquiries regarding the car's specifications and maintenance history. @h2o_snow asks about low mileage and its pre-electronic attributes, while @SoCal2TXAudi inquires about the carbon cleaning work done. Others, like @Rado4Ringer and @jakeg104, request clarifications on maintenance records, the original state of the paint, and alignment issues with the front bumper, indicating a general interest in the car's upkeep without showing passion or disdain.
Negative: There are concerns raised about specific issues that may affect the vehicle's reliability. @Fly-Ride-Camp questions the CARB certification of the high-flow cats, while @Grenzy queries a rattling noise coming from the defroster vent, suggesting potential mechanical issues that might need attention. Overall, these comments reflect a cautious but engaged perspective from potential buyers who are considering both the advantages and the implications of the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its striking blue color and originality. @70_duster mentioned loving the blue on blue combo, while @AlpineJay expressed strong emotional attachment, noting they wouldn't trade their own Tiger for any other car but would consider this one because of its appealing aesthetics. @StrokedBored called it a beautiful, original early Tiger, reflecting a daily driving history of a similar model. @packardv8 and @jack vines found various features appealing, highlighting the car's rare attributes and inviting enthusiasm for spirited driving experiences. Overall, the positive commentary emphasized the vehicle's beauty, originality, and the joy it brings to its owners and enthusiasts.
Neutral: Some comments focused on specifics regarding the vehicle's features and condition rather than expressing strong opinions. @mikewood and @TigerGary discussed the car's presentation and original parts without labeling it as fully restored, suggesting mild refurbishments were made. @austinhealer raised questions about the authenticity and details like the VIN tags and the type of interior, while @Elk1026 asked about a feature next to the fuel gauge. This neutral commentary often included inquiries that suggest potential bidders want to clarify the car's history and condition without being overtly critical.
Negative: Conversely, several commenters pointed out aspects that might need improvement or clarification. @mcpaxtonman noted the need for visible work on the suspension and undercar components, asking for prior images of the body. @Berend15 suggested that the undercarriage could benefit from professional cleaning, while @mikewood raised concerns about the potential need for suspension bush replacements. @TAH_Tiger mentioned an issue with the jack placement, highlighting a discrepancy that might indicate a need for review. Overall, the negative commentary focused on potential issues and the need for further inspection before purchasing, which could deter some bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle itself, with @70_duster stating they love the wheels and @sweetcars remarking on the car's personality. @rrv912 provided insight into the affordability of parts and the ease of working on the Cabrio model, assuring that it would be a good investment. Additionally, @swoticator also complimented the car's appearance, and @KellykeenanXY thanked @jvoytilla for the detailed responses he provided throughout the conversation.
Neutral: @jvoytilla, the seller, addressed various queries regarding the vehicle's maintenance, including the timing belt and battery drain issues associated with the CD changer. He acknowledged the importance of keeping communication transparent about the car's condition, as seen when responding to @Gadgetman1963 and @KellykeenanXY. He also confirmed recent oil changes and new tires based on inquiries while subtly noting some cosmetic issues like a scratch and glued steering column cover without overemphasizing their severity.
Negative: Despite positive remarks, some concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's conditions. @Gadgetman1963 inquired about the timing belt due to its age, and @mk7Pilot pointed out a potential issue with the wiper blades, which could affect the windshield's safety. @KellykeenanXY mentioned a notable scratch on the car and sought estimates for its repair, which could be costly. Furthermore, @BillyWegs shared his negative experience with a similar vehicle's wiring issues, reflecting concerns potential buyers might have.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @spencerbmartin expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle, indicating it is attractive and satisfying, while @beNGK acknowledged its impressive aesthetics and noted the car's performance characteristics, highlighting its smoothness and speed. Additionally, @RandB_Cars, the seller, conveyed confidence in the car's driving quality, sharing that the previous owner was meticulous in maintenance and had the vehicle serviced regularly at a dealer.
Neutral: Several comments sought clarity on the vehicle's service history. @Seb24 directly asked the seller for insight on the car's maintenance, to which @RandB_Cars responded that while the previous owner was diligent and serviced the vehicle at a dealer, there were no comprehensive service records available. Furthermore, @Penev230 pointed out a potential discrepancy regarding the vehicle’s service history as per Carfax, suggesting that while dealer services usually show up on such reports, they appear limited in this case, leaving some uncertainty.
Negative: @dlbuffalo expressed a somewhat critical tone by joking about the lack of maintenance history and inquired if anyone had heard about it. @beNGK raised concerns about specific potential issues that could arise with the vehicle, highlighting repair considerations like the HPFP rebuild or the rear air struts, indicating a need for future attention. Overall, while the vehicle is seen as impressive, the absence of detailed service records and critical comments raised concerns about long-term maintenance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz finds the Texas Unimog to be an excellent example and humorously compares it to a bumblebee, wishing good luck with the sale. @rr_spec2 expresses strong appreciation for the vehicle while mentioning a preference for swapping the front grille, noting its high cost as a utility truck. @24kRollsRoyce compliments the rig's beauty and shares their positive experience with a similar vehicle, hoping for a successful sale.
Neutral: @BlueChipCar (The Seller) addresses questions regarding rust, stating that it is mostly surface rust with no structural concerns and all four tires were replaced in 2024. The seller also clarifies details about the truck's cruising speed and confirms it runs well, ready for long-distance travel. Several commenters, including @kcshoots and @rpopsbravo, ask for additional details about rust and vehicle specifications, indicating that there is a keen interest in learning more.
Negative: @ksfa10 raises concerns about potential corrosion issues, implying the vehicle may have been affected by salt exposure. @wanabxtrm echoes these concerns, requesting additional photos of frame and suspension points to assess possible subassembly replacements based on observed rust. @FastFox suggests fixing the vehicle's Mercedes emblem, indicating that it might not meet their expectations in its current state.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters express their admiration for the vehicle's condition and originality. @Urbanista considers it to have a superb undercarriage for a car of its age in Pennsylvania. @Dick_Steinkamp points out the car's special features, like the original radio and well-preserved trunk, emphasizing the rarity of its uncut dash and original parts. @OnkelStuttgart highlights the enjoyable driving experience compared to modern sedans, while @BMcD even requests a driving video, indicating a strong interest in the car's performance.
Neutral: Various commenters share neutral opinions and questions about specific features and history of the car. @Bavariakid asks if the AC works and raises concerns about potential overheating. @170V (The Seller) replies to these inquiries with details about the car’s condition, including the AC being charged but the blower not functioning. @Dick_Steinkamp provides informative advice regarding tire date codes and suggests that the tool tray may be repairable, which demonstrates a constructive level of engagement from the community.
Negative: Some negative aspects are mentioned regarding the vehicle's overall condition. @Dick_Steinkamp notes the need for repair on the exhaust pipe and repadding of the driver's seat, while @Bavariakid raises concerns about potential rust and asks for more detailed photos of specific areas. @JGraham suggests that the car would benefit from a manual transmission swap, reflecting a common sentiment that the automatic may limit its appeal to purists. Additionally, the comments indicate worries about age-related issues and the overall maintenance of the AC system.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle, calling it a beautifully preserved Meyers Manxter that captures the essence of its philosophy. @57charlie noted that the vehicle would be even cooler with a legendary driver like Steve McQueen at the wheel, while @Corvenza praised the thoughtful personalization in the build, highlighting the quality of the interior and the exciting performance of the EJ25 engine. Commenters like @LuckyChief also added optimism, expressing hope for high bids on this striking car.
Neutral: Several questions concerning the specifications and details of the vehicle were raised by potential buyers. @The_Underhill_Account inquired about California smog requirements, while @Pvrosejr4 asked for clarification on the year of the chassis and registration details with the DMV. Additionally, some commenters mentioned the absence of important details such as the existence of additional radiators, pointing out the need for more information from the seller, @silverarrowcarsltd, before making a bid.
Negative: Concerns were voiced regarding the seller's responsiveness and the clarity of answers about the vehicle's registration and emissions. @trw pointed out that crucial questions about emissions registration had gone unanswered, prompting further frustration regarding the seller's engagement. Commenters like @Manxter5 expressed disappointment in the seller's limited responsiveness compared to their previous experiences, which detracted from the auction experience for potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ClassicJack123 (The Seller) expresses pride in presenting this stunning 5,110 mile Saturn Sky, remarking on its immaculate maintenance and low mileage. Local drives and careful storage highlight the car's condition. Commenters @Daniel_H and @Cheth20 praise its value and beauty, especially admiring the Midnight Blue paintwork, with @OrmondStar sharing the joy of color variations in sunlight. Overall, the sentiment among fans shows genuine enthusiasm for this classic vehicle, with many acknowledging its rare status and the joy of driving it.
Neutral: The discussion includes practical responses regarding the vehicle's condition and specifics like tire maintenance. @Vitonet inquires about the tires, which prompts @ClassicJack123 (The Seller) to provide detailed tread conditions and date codes. There’s a mutual understanding that while some lower mileage models exist, the Saturn Sky maintains a unique charm and value, setting the stage for excitement as the auction approaches its end.
Negative: There is a hint of skepticism from @Heil240sx, questioning the integrity of the frame with comparisons to JB Weld, which @ClassicJack123 (The Seller) counters as merely factory seam sealer. This exchange highlights a subtle undercurrent of concern regarding quality, though mostly overshadowed by the overall positive reception from others. @2011SLSAMG responds to @Heil240sx, stressing the importance of seeking clarity before jumping to conclusions, indicating a potential divide in opinion about the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Daniel_H shared a heartwarming story about how his mother loves her Nissan truck, referring to it affectionately as "mossy". He noted the truck's metal timing chain as a significant advantage, suggesting that prospective buyers would appreciate its durability for years to come. @homercook also chimed in positively, reminiscing about his own excellent experience with a previous model, highlighting the truck's reliability and appealing design.
Neutral: @airheadearl raised a point regarding the absence of the carfax report, questioning whether the vehicle has undergone recent smog checks, while later confirming with @DamonEmily (The Seller) that there is a smog certificate. Additionally, @LVentura asked about the truck's low mileage over recent years, seeking clarity on its usage history. @chivasnation2003, while initially intrigued, prompted the seller to provide details about the paint quality, emphasizing the need for clear photographs and transparency.
Negative: However, not all comments were favorable. @chivasnation2003 pointed out various touch-up paint jobs and oversprays that could indicate potential issues, suggesting that the seller should have disclosed these defects beforehand. @MichaelB330 supported these concerns but noted that proper disclosure and clearer images were essential for transparency in the sale. @DamonEmily (The Seller) acknowledged previous oversights regarding the condition of the truck and committed to improving the transparency of the selling process, noting instances of wear and repair but also expressing regret for any dissatisfaction from previous buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed genuine admiration for the vehicle's unique design and craftsmanship. @PSFarm complimented the vehicle's aesthetics, particularly its "eyebrows" and overall look. @UltimateOC provided a detailed breakdown of the restoration process, highlighting the high-quality materials used and extensive work done, showcasing the vehicle's stunning appearance. @rbf120 echoed similar sentiments, noting it was a great little cart with a finish that surpassed the original. @leepear appreciated the electric functionality and its historical context, while @Pinzthing73 was confident that the Trident would attract positive attention at car shows.
Neutral: Commenters shared informative insights regarding the vehicle's specifications and potential uses. @arionrjw, the seller, stated that the vehicle can reach speeds of 15MPH and outlined the various settings for battery voltage and corresponding horsepower. @Wstutz inquired about the top speed and potential limitations, prompting further discussions on performance. Perspectives on the vehicle's street legality and historical significance were also brought up by enthusiasts like @leepear, who discussed regional trends and licensing.
Negative: Some comments reflected skepticism about the vehicle's practicality and performance. @PWSchuh compared it to a golf cart, suggesting that while it could be used on the road, it might not be the best choice for everyday driving. @bondgraham humorously referred to it as a cross between a refrigerator and a go-kart. Others voiced concerns about the limited speed capabilities and potential safety issues, especially when reaching higher speeds with its three-wheel design, as pointed out by @leepear. Overall, while many were charmed by the Trident, some offered caution regarding its functionality as a vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the 1966 Yamaha YM2C Big Bear Scrambler from @ThePetrolVault (The Seller) and others reflect a strong appreciation for its vintage appeal and character. Commenters like @alfa1750weber and @Ptrem praised the bike's aesthetics, with @alfa1750weber expressing interest in how it performs in the auction, indicating a personal connection to these vintage models. @SRB reminisced about their days riding a similar bike, highlighting the fond memories and reliability associated with it, while @MGs4me revered this model as the inspiration for their love of motorcycles.
Neutral: Many users engaged with questions and clarifications regarding the bike's features and specifications. @caraota205 inquired about the originality of the paint and the condition of the exhaust pipes, showing a common interest in the bike's authenticity and functionality. The exchange also highlighted some confusion regarding the model's identification, with @DucatiJohn pointing out a potential error about the engine size, which was promptly acknowledged by @ThePetrolVault (The Seller), leading to an updated listing. Such interactions showed a balanced curiosity alongside enthusiasm.
Negative: While the overall sentiment was positive, there were some concerns identified. @1FOCUS-RS raised questions about the missing bracket for the exhaust pipe, suggesting the need for attention to detail that could affect the bike's performance. Additionally, @projectstw sought under seat photos, indicating a desire for more visibility into the bike's condition, reflecting a cautious approach from potential buyers. Overall, while the bike was largely celebrated, these inquiries suggest a prudent consideration from some members of the community.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters express significant admiration for the CL65 AMG, highlighting it as a potential collectible and a unique luxury vehicle. @Rhinosb calls it beautiful, while @eugenekharon notes that once adjusted well and fitted with new tires, it drives incredibly smoothly, likening its acceleration to that of a high-horsepower electric vehicle. @cottrd praises the performance and handling qualities, asserting that these V12 models are undervalued for the capabilities they offer, and appreciates the rarity of the coupe version. The Seller, @MarshallGoldman, echoes these sentiments, promoting the model as a premium offering that reflects a unique era in automotive design, suggesting that well-kept examples have substantial future value.
Neutral: Several background questions about the vehicle's maintenance and features emerge, reflecting a cautious yet interested perspective from potential buyers. @merkins2000 queries about the tandem pump replacements and the condition of the main harness, seeking clarity on potential maintenance issues. @cottrd and @MarshallGoldman share insights on the importance of proper maintenance routines, specifically regarding the ABC system, which should be flushed regularly to ensure reliable performance. Remarks about the vehicle's ride height set up by @eugenekharon indicate a focus on aesthetic presentation, which is valued by potential buyers as part of the car's appeal.
Negative: Concerns exist among buyers regarding the maintenance costs associated with this high-performance vehicle, particularly surrounding the ABC system and potential repairs. @merkins2000 suggests that many are deterred by these costs, while @cottrd mentions problems with some replaced components potentially leading to issues if not followed up properly, particularly advising on the necessity of regular fluid flushing. There are also discussions about the reliability of various parts and the availability of components, with suggestions that the V12 can be less stressed than newer models, yet the perception remains that maintenance remains a significant consideration for prospective owners.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: There are numerous positive comments highlighting the appeal of the vehicle. @notlikelytowin4 noted that the car has been driven a little, suggesting some level of engagement rather than it being a garage queen. @CapitalChevrolet, who is the seller, confirmed that the car was driven responsibly by the president of a local Corvette club. @PopPop62 emphasized the beauty of the car, describing it as absolutely insane, while @09zo6pj praised the low wing and the impressive LT5 engine, stating that the buyer will get a great deal considering the miles on it.
Neutral: Several comments offer neutral insights about the vehicle's condition and appearance. @assphaltranger raised a concern about potential cracks on the rim, but this was clarified by @CapitalChevrolet, who explained that they were actually shadows from the tire's sidewall. @newcarpro agreed that the marks were indeed tire whiskers, reinforcing the points made by others about the vehicle's upkeep. @capitalChevrolet also invited further inquiries regarding the auction, indicating an openness in communication.
Negative: There are few negative comments regarding the vehicle, mostly touching on minor concerns. @badcad expressed skepticism about the vehicle's value post-usage, implying that despite the car's low mileage, it might not hold its MSRP effectively. This sentiment reflects a general wariness some potential buyers may have regarding the long-term value of higher-mileage performance cars like this one.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received numerous compliments from bidders and expert commenters alike, with several acknowledging its stunning **Barolo Red** color, which stands out from the typical options available. Commenter @gscharnagl expressed admiration for the car, stating it has been one of the best they've owned. Others, including @ROB56, noted the low mileage of only 37,000 miles, highlighting the vehicle's great condition. @OCEquestrian and @SirMercsALot emphasized the uniqueness of the color combination, with @SirMercsALot specifically calling it 'stunning' and inquiring about its rarity, reflecting an appreciation for this special feature.
Neutral: The auction is described by @ozas17 (The Seller) as a no-reserve event, inviting bids from potential buyers. While some participants, like @shoggy1970, requested more visual evidence of the car's lighting and features, the seller assured them that the lighting issue was merely a photographic anomaly. Participants such as @DLVRYMN and commenters inquiring about features like the window sticker and a possibility for a test drive indicate that there are typical questions that arise in auctions, showing a keen interest from potential buyers.
Negative: However, not all feedback is wholly positive. @adjag007 raised concerns regarding the frequency of brake and rotor replacements, questioning their necessity as they were changed twice at relatively low mileage. Additionally, @RSB-Scottsdale expressed price-related queries and inquired about possible suspension issues, indicating potential concerns about maintenance costs associated with owning a luxury vehicle like this Mercedes-Benz. This mixed feedback highlights the scrutiny and specific worries that come with a high-value auction vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters have expressed positive opinions about the vehicle, highlighting its attractive color and overall appeal. @GTOscott1967 praises the Signet Gold color, calling it "awesome," and @Madd6109 appreciates both the beauty of the car and its color combination, despite noting that it needs some attention to detail, like the hood adjustment. @msjbythebay also mentions the desirability of the 'His and Hers' shifter, calling the car a splendid example with a beautiful color combination, while @vaitx (The Seller) reassures everyone that the car is straight and rust-free, emphasizing its quality and authenticity, which adds more confidence for potential buyers.
Neutral: There are several neutral or inquisitive comments regarding specific details about the vehicle's condition and features. @Rupert and @Carbuf1 have requested additional pictures to address concerns about the hood, rockers, and possible rust signs. @yooperpaul raises questions about the rear deck lid's color and the engine block's paint, while @WIZZZZ inquires about the functionality of various components. @vaitx (The Seller) has responded to these queries, confirming that the hood will be repaired, that there is no rust, and explaining the common practice of bypassing the heater core in Arizona.
Negative: On the downside, there are some critiques about the vehicle that lend a negative tone to certain comments. @Madd6109 humorously notes that the vehicle is not quite presented well, likening it to being "all dressed up for the prom" but lacking basic grooming. Additionally, @BaronVonZeppelin disputes some of the historical claims made regarding the vehicle's paint details, stating that they are inaccurately represented and cautioning against misinformation in the discussion. Such critiques indicate some skepticism among certain potential buyers about the car's presentation and the accuracy of its specifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed enthusiasm for the Jetta TDI, highlighting its impressive fuel efficiency and driving experience. @HeadMaster1 noted that it could achieve 50 MPG on the highway when driven at moderate speeds, while @TDI2013 (The Seller) described the vehicle as the most fun to drive among their past cars, with admirable handling and pep. @Youngtimerclassics fondly recalled personal experiences with similar models, praising the car's appeal and wishing the seller luck with the sale.
Neutral: A number of questions and comments sought clarity on various aspects of the vehicle's condition and history. @Moose8 asked for cold start and driving videos and inquired about tire date codes, while @C5LoadToad wondered about the infotainment system's features. @Dleebr also questioned whether the tires were original and raised concerns about the estimated cost of timing belt replacement, demonstrating a cautious approach to potential buyers.
Negative: Some concerns were raised by users regarding the vehicle's maintenance history, as @Joshuaham pointed out anomalies in the Carfax report, while @k1llionare questioned the originality of the timing belt. Additionally, @passitbob expressed personal concern over a similar injury which affected driving ability, emphasizing that they would prefer a different transmission type. Lastly, @Just_Ed advised on the necessity of replacing aging tires despite good tread, underlining potential safety issues that could arise from their condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Scott expressed enthusiasm about the vehicle, noting it as a perfect shell for a vintage race car. @LouFifer appreciated the tidy restoration, particularly praising the inclusion of the original Moto-Lita Steering Wheel in addition to the new one. @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar, as the seller, described the car as a freshly restored 1963 MGB that had undergone extensive work, with praises for its full restoration process, stating that the car is a complete gem needing only a driver and a winding road. @bradgoodman0409 found the pull handle B beautiful and extended good luck to potential bidders, while @halfthrottle shared fond memories of owning and driving classic MGBs, expressing confidence that this car would provide many enjoyable miles.
Neutral: @Sierra_Classic_Sportscar highlighted their credibility as a British car restoration shop rather than a dealership, inviting potential bidders for inspections and test drives during the auction. They provided logistical details on the auction process, highlighting the as-is condition of the vehicles, transfer of ownership, and options for international buyers. Furthermore, they addressed questions from commenters: @Walarch received clarification regarding the car's steel hood and 3-main bearing engine, and @peterboh was informed that the vehicle features vinyl upholstery instead of leather.
Negative: Comments from users like @patjolson and @Walarch raised inquiries about technical specifications, such as the engine type and the soft top's functionality, indicating a need for clarity on these details. @Wheelyneat expressed some disappointment regarding the choice of upholstery, suggesting that additional investment in higher-quality leather would have enhanced the interior. Although @GlenK and @Mgrescueguy commented on functional aspects like heating, their remarks pointed out a possible area of concern regarding the car's comfort during cooler drives.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle, particularly highlighting its beautiful seal grey color and black interior. @CaptChaos found the overall condition and mileage appealing, suggesting that the car invites driving. Enthusiasts expressed excitement about the features, particularly the manual six-speed transmission and aesthetics of the model.
Neutral: Some discussions revolved around ongoing concerns and recommendations from the vehicle's inspection. @yamez inquired about the completion of certain recommended services while acknowledging the car's appealing aspects. @evan272 (The Seller) provided detailed responses addressing maintenance queries and promised additional videos, reflecting a willingness to engage with potential bidders and clarify uncertainties.
Negative: Certain comments raised concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and history. @Robert930 pointed out potential issues with the factory paint on the rims, while @matts911 noted discrepancies regarding the maintenance history, especially the absence of records for spark plug changes. Additionally, @yamez highlighted potential transmission issues, indicating that the cold grinding noise when shifting into fifth gear could suggest more significant repairs may be necessary.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed enthusiasm for the vehicle's aesthetic and overall presentation. @mike_rockwell highlighted the appealing color choices and described the truck as 'really nice,' while @mduel86 praised it as a 'gorgeous C10' and expressed love for its features. @RWB_AZ called it a 'stunner,' emphasizing its visual appeal, and @mike_rockwell noted its potential for a higher bidding due to its impressive attributes, calling it another beauty on BaT.
Neutral: Some comments focused on technical aspects and inquiries about the vehicle's specifications. @AB2112 asked about the horsepower, which @MoxeeMuscleCars (The Seller) clarified to be an average of 403hp, with a potential increase from the stage II cam. Other questions included requests for information about the restoration process and original parts, with @chelmsfordws and @scstosich specifically asking for pictures and the original SPID placard, both of which were confirmed not to be available by the seller.
Negative: Conversely, a few comments pointed out shortcomings in relation to the vehicle's features compared to others listed. @csptrn noted that while the truck is nice, it doesn't match the caliber of the two preceding C10s on the platform, criticizing it for still having drum brakes and stock suspension components. @mike_rockwell also pointed out that a lot of the original features may no longer be relevant due to the complete resto-mod build, suggesting the vehicle might need further enhancements to reach its full potential.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @PorschePhi1 commented positively on the vehicle's color combination, expressing that it is one of their all-time favorites. Their enthusiasm for the car is clear, which reflects well on its aesthetic appeal.
Neutral: In response to @PorschePhi1, @akadj7 (The Seller) provided detailed information about the IMS bearing, stating that it is original to the vehicle. They explained that the car is from a transition year, meaning it might have either a dual-row or a single-row bearing. The seller reassured potential buyers that there have been no symptoms indicating IMS-related issues and that regular servicing has been conducted with clean inspections of oil and filters.
Negative: While @PorschePhi1 raised a concern about the IMS bearing replacement, which is a common worry among enthusiasts, @akadj7 (The Seller) addressed this by stating that the engine has shown no signs of problems. However, the potential buyer's apprehension about the original IMS bearing may deter some from proceeding with the purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 appreciates the Mustang's beautiful Phoenician Yellow color, calling it one of their favorites. The thanks from users like @rw400 and expressions of nostalgic admiration for the Mustang, such as @Henagej's reference to the character Darren McGavin, highlight the vehicle's classic appeal. Additionally, @istewart has provided updates on the steering wheel and shows willingness to create further videos, indicating a collaborative spirit with potential buyers.
Neutral: Comments from users like @hoppy18 and @mtbird66 include requests for more videos, particularly regarding the vehicle's engine smoke and cold start conditions. Others have asked for images of the front tires and the front end of the car to understand its condition better. @istewart's responses signify acknowledgment of these requests and an effort to address them, although the feedback remains largely informative rather than emotive.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition are raised by users like @JohnK3 and @BlueSquirrel22, who inquire about the potential for leaks and the smoke observed in the engine videos. The mention of the off-center steering wheel by @mtbird66 and subsequent clarification by @istewart indicate issues that may pertain to the initial presentation of the vehicle. Overall, uncertainties regarding the smoke and the steering installation raise red flags for some potential buyers.
![]() |
|
|
Positive: The comments highlight the overall positive impression of the 1978 Kawasaki KZ200, particularly appreciating its lightweight design and reliability. @ceeul8r (The Seller) emphasizes that the bike starts, runs, shifts, and brakes well, with all lights functioning properly. Users like @rofandofy mention that it's a great small and fun bike, manageable yet capable of reaching speeds up to 60 MPH. Many comments reflect a sense of nostalgia and fondness for the KZ200, showcasing its agility and ease of riding.
Neutral: Some commentators express neutral observations regarding the bike's features and history. For instance, @minidude shares experiences about using a similar bike for motorcycle testing, describing their own modifications and maintenance without expressing strong opinions. @WKC inquires about the brake light's functionality, which @ceeul8r (The Seller) promptly addresses, stating that it was simply a bulb issue. The discussions around features such as the mechanical brake caliper and the unique drop seat further illustrate a practical appreciation for the bike's design without extreme enthusiasm or criticism.
Negative: While there are no overtly negative comments, there are hints of caution regarding the bike's condition and maintenance. @minidude notes the need for proper adjustment and lubrication of the front brake caliper, advising against abuse of the brake cable due to its scarcity and cost. Additionally, concerns about the bike not being as iconic as other motorcycle brands are alluded to in @ceeul8r's remarks about the bidding process. Despite these minor concerns, overall, the sentiment remains largely positive.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Multiple commenters praised the vehicle for its overall quality and condition. @PMerkle expressed admiration, stating it was a phenomenal truck, while @44magFTW described the heavy-duty nature of the truck as offering a true feel of truck driving. @MMorgan22 remarked on the cleanliness of the truck, wishing it luck for the auction. Additionally, @Smilinpat commended the seller for showcasing the vehicle well, especially highlighting the clear photo of the RPO codes.
Neutral: Several inquiries focused on specific details about the truck's features and history. @44magFTW asked about the bed size, to which @ron67 (The Seller) confirmed it is an 8ft bed. @mr.russky sought information about maintenance records and whether the clutch was original, prompting @ron67 to explain that most of the maintenance was done by the previous owner, along with recent changes like new tires and shocks. Comments also touched on the repainting of the truck, with @MMT2022 asking for details about it and @ron67 clarifying that the full respray was due to oxidation from the Nevada sun, enhancing the truck's appearance and value.
Negative: Some comments pointed out potential concerns with the vehicle. @sofakingbad asked about exhaust manifold bolts, a common issue, indicating a concern for maintenance. @irhunter also noted the design flaw related to these bolts, mentioning how it suggests poor engineering. Despite these negatives, @ron67 responded to each inquiry, showing attentiveness to the potential issues. Overall, while some highlighted mechanical concerns, they seemed minor compared to the truck's positive attributes.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 commented on the vehicle's exceptional beauty, noting its gorgeous color combination and rare features like a factory sunroof. She described it as a desirable classic, one of her favorite Jaguars. @hoppy18 and @tjclassic joined the praise, expressing excitement about the car's aesthetics and history. @tim_t highlighted the extensive effort and expense that went into restoring and upgrading the vehicle, appreciating its special nature resulting from thoughtful modifications. @cmkinney agreed, emphasizing the stunning appearance of the Mk II, especially in a darker shade.
Neutral: Several commenters raised specific questions about the car's features and performance. @DaveD inquired about the interior materials and the functionality of various components while expressing his admiration for the original design. @the.jag.man asked about the performance of the car's generator in relation to its A/C system and requested videos demonstrating various car functions. @vettesrmyluv (El vendedor) answered these concerns, clarifying that the vehicle uses the original generator without issues and that the A/C works effectively. He promised to provide additional video evidence, due to current weather conditions affecting test drives.
Negative: Concerns about potential mechanical issues with the car were raised by multiple individuals. @Unhingd specifically mentioned a knocking sound heard at higher RPMs, while @Drumond and @ebrand raised suspicions about the sound being a genuine mechanical issue rather than simply a recording issue. @davidxk suggested the seller's lack of comment on the noise indicates that it may have arisen during their ownership. @Sheffieldguy expressed hesitation to purchase the car unless the knocking issue was resolved, and @tim_t cautioned that some necessary mechanical refreshing might be expected due to the car's age and mileage.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is an exceptional 2014 JEEP Wrangler *SPORT-S* with only 56k original miles and has been adult-owned and garage-kept, contributing to its beautiful original condition. It is noted for its rust-free body and chassis, complemented by an attractive *Alpine-White* exterior and a slate gray leather interior. According to @26PACHANGA (The Seller), the Jeep is loaded with a substantial amount of factory options valued at $7000, including a powerful 3.6 Pentastar V6 engine, full-metal doors, and various comfort and convenience features. It has a clean accident-free history, excellent service records, and has recently passed a Virginia State safety inspection, making it a reliable choice for buyers.
Neutral: Commenters have been curious about the specifics of the vehicle's features and history. @BizJetTech asked about the factory tow package and the origin of the leather seats, while @gbaad86 inquired about recent title activity in Montana and whether the Jeep came from a private seller or dealership. @26PACHANGA (The Seller) provided detailed responses, confirming that the leather was dealer installed and explained the title transfer process, assuring potential buyers of the vehicle's clear title and condition. Furthermore, the seller mentioned adding various photos and videos to showcase different features, including a detailed walk-around video and engine compartment photos, aiming to provide complete transparency.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, some questions raised by commenters hint at uncertainty regarding the vehicle's past. @BizJetTech expressed concern about whether the vehicle had previously been with Carvana, which is noted for dealing with a number of vehicles previously titled in Montana, and @gbaad86 sought clarification regarding the Montana title history to understand its previous ownership better. Although @26PACHANGA (The Seller) addressed these inquiries, there remains a slight air of skepticism among potential buyers about whether they can fully trust the vehicle's documented history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AdamG454 remarked on the aesthetics of the T/A, stating it was a nice vehicle and noting the intriguing detail about the 2.56 rear gears. @Cafe echoed this sentiment, appreciating the T/A's overall appearance, while @CDehne called it beautiful and highlighted its unique, one-year-only color. Additionally, @HBM0302 showed appreciation for the build quality, confirming the L78 designation on the build sheet and wishing the seller good luck with the auction.
Neutral: @IK54 provided detailed technical insights into the rear axle options for the W72 engine, mentioning that the car likely has the base L78 despite its appearance. @Ajax14 also raised questions about the vehicle's audio configuration, specifically regarding the inclusion of an 8-track player, which was indicated as a feature in the auction but was later confirmed to be incorrect by the seller. Similarly, @Classic62ss (The Seller) clarified that the car does not have an 8-track radio but rather the factory FM/AM setup, correcting the listing based on user feedback.
Negative: There was confusion and some dissatisfaction regarding the accuracy of the auction listing. @Pontiac2020 and other users highlighted discrepancies about the 8-track player claim, noting it was not accurate and should be removed from the listing. Furthermore, @IK54 and @PontiacFan61 engaged in back-and-forth discussions regarding rear gear ratios, suggesting a lack of clear communication or consistency about the car's specifications, which may concern potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters appreciated the truck's status as a survivor and its unique Montana heritage, praising it as a 'marvelous MONTANA F-250' (@boaboyoz) and a 'great example' (@70_duster). @Ranchero65 noted the truck's condition reflected its hard and caring treatment over the years, suggesting it had been well-loved despite showing signs of use. The seller, @Cammergalaxie, emphasized the truck's working state and patina, indicating that he preferred to leave it untouched rather than polished, which resonated well with those valuing authenticity over aesthetic perfection.
Neutral: There were several comments discussing the truck's features and minor repairs needed. @Cammergalaxie provided insights into the truck's history, including the replacement of the original engine with a 390 from another vehicle along with a new clutch setup. Commenters like @Ranchero65 highlighted the rarity of the paint combination and suggested that a black vinyl replacement might be a practical upgrade. Additionally, some users inquired about the availability of original parts, such as the grill guard accessories, while acknowledging the seller's active participation in discussing the truck's condition.
Negative: On the downside, mentions of some mechanical issues were raised, particularly concerning the front differential spider gears, which @Cammergalaxie noted would require replacement for rigorous use. Concerns were also raised regarding the truck's absence of seat belts (@Cammergalaxie noted that they were not included), and some commenters mentioned the need for new tires due to weather cracks. These aspects contributed to a cautious perspective among prospective buyers, despite the truck's overall appeal and character.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @AudioRhino admires the vehicle as a superb example, particularly noting its unique Tawny Rose color and manual transmission, making it a gem for collectors. Others like @Dollycat3 and @PDXBryan express love for its stunning looks and design, appreciating details like the spacious hardtop and the attractive color choice. @Raffi highlights the extravagant styling typical of the era, with fins and chrome details that make it a standout piece of automotive history.
Neutral: @4spdBernie, the seller, engages with potential buyers, encouraging them to view the car in person or through driving videos he's compiling. @David_P reflects on the surprising choice of manual transmissions in Buicks from 1959, while @hucklebear inquires about the car's drivability. Various commenters reference their experiences with similar vehicles, discussing features and memories associated with the vintage car scene.
Negative: @TheCritic makes a somewhat dark observation about the original owner possibly meeting an early demise due to the challenges of driving the car without modern conveniences like power steering or brakes. @mgossage raises concerns about potential discrepancies in the vehicle's listing regarding the paint condition, and other users voice worries about shipping costs impacting auction participation. Additionally, @hucklebear questions mechanical issues that may impair drivability, suggesting some uncertainty about the car's overall condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @parshooter describes the car as great looking and mentions its nice ride quality. @ShirtPants calls it a beaut, while @Jimmyp75 rates it 10 out of 10 for being one of the last great V8 performance sedans, emphasizing its perfection on all fronts. @Paul6200 notes that this model is one of the final 2200 300C’s and praises its 6.4 scat pack engine, stating that his wife loves hers and it's a blast to drive. @carguy.club brings in a market comparison, mentioning a previous model that sold for a substantial amount, suggesting this one may sell well too. @300CMan shares his personal experience, highlighting the car's smoothness on the highway and power, expressing that the future buyer will be pleased.
Neutral: Comments reflect a sense of community among enthusiasts, with encouragement from @parshooter and @Jimmyp75 wishing the seller good luck while expressing admiration for the vehicle. The specifications shared by @Paul6200 help potential buyers understand its rarity and engine type, while @carguy.club provides market insight that situates the vehicle within its selling context. Overall, the tone remains supportive and informative, contributing to a sense of camaraderie among those interested in the vehicle.
Negative: There are no negative comments regarding the vehicle in the provided comments; all participants express enthusiasm and positivity towards its features and performance.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed strong appreciation for the vehicle, with @Wolfenhaus declaring, "Come to papa 😍🤤," indicating excitement over its desirability. @Brutaltruth simply stated, "Nice car," while @Patina63 mentioned they were pleasantly surprised by the availability of the Weissach package without the RS option, expressing admiration. Many found the specifications of the car impressive, with @RayoZ highlighting the importance of the manual transmission and the mag wheels, stating, "This is it, people seem to rarely add the mag wheels for the finishing touch."
Neutral: Comments also highlighted interesting details about the vehicle's specifications and market positioning. @Motorenn, the seller, noted the manual transmission and Weissach package, wishing luck to bidders. @Amgman1 shared knowledge about seating options, mentioning, "You can also order the weissach with the 18 way seats," which prompted @parshooter to express surprise at such a feature. Some commenters compared the vehicle to their personal models, with @carguy101 discussing a Tamiya RC version he customized, while @Pinkbunny speculated on how the auction would proceed in light of recent market activity.
Negative: Conversely, some comments reflected concerns about the market and pricing. @vet314 pointed out that the vehicle would come with a significant markup, saying, "Schön, but this will unfortunately be Markup X 2." Similarly, @Amgman1 expressed frustration with the flipper market, stating, "Gosh I hate the flipper market. It is what it is though." @ninekflat6 offered a pessimistic outlook on the bidding process, suggesting that the car might not fetch high bids, saying, "It will probably do less given not touring unless strange bidding keeps up the bids."
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed excitement and admiration for the vehicle's unique features. @Big_DaddyRL called it a "Nice Five-Ohh!" while @JoeRocha noted the "No reserve this time – NICE! Best of luck!!" @Leonia added that it deserves more love, mentioning that the no reserve should help reach a good threshold. @ings5280 and @Dropthepuck shared their love for the memorable red color, with one mentioning, "That is a lot of red… love it!!" Commenters appreciated its original condition, with @GTRfan1357 pointing out its rarity as a bone-stock car, further celebrated by @justpaul for the crisp velour seats.
Neutral: The seller, @ctsans, provided detailed information about the vehicle's condition and history, emphasizing that it is as clean as the pictures indicate. They confirmed that the car has not been restored, is in immaculate condition, and mentioned the inclusion of original wheels and tires. Several individuals, like @riddle12132033 and @jp0051, inquired about the restoration and title status, highlighting the car's registration as important as they consider potential issues surrounding ownership documentation.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the car's paperwork and registration. @jp0051 asked about the original title and clarity on the 'duplicate registration,' which @GTRfan1357 echoed, raising worries about potential title issues during the auction process. There were multiple inquiries about the title's status, with the seller explaining that Connecticut does not issue titles for vehicles over 20 years old, which may cause confusion for bidders unfamiliar with state laws. This topic seemed to raise a sense of uncertainty amongst potential bidders, who found the title situation crucial.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @njsteve praises the vehicle as a great example in a rare color, noting its amazing performance. @djMaldoror also admires the beauty of the car and shares that it resembles his own vehicle in a different color. @flyingmachine3 reflects on nostalgia, mentioning that only 154 of this Red Pearl color were made, adding to the vehicle's uniqueness. @will951 shares a personal connection by recalling his father's similar car from 1991, describing it as fantastic. @Cheth20 expresses appreciation for the car's interior, recognizing it as cool.
Neutral: @smartguy1014 (The Seller) discusses the car's history, mentioning it was owned by the same individual for 35 years and was garage kept. The seller provides a detailed condition report, stating that the vehicle is rust-free with original paint, aside from minor clearcoat damage and some chips that were repaired. The seller offers to do FaceTime walk-arounds for interested buyers, indicating their accessibility and willingness to engage with potential customers.
Negative: There are minimal negative comments regarding the vehicle. @njsteve points out a detail about the front rims being on the wrong sides, suggesting they should be swapped due to their directional nature. The indication of some clearcoat damage on the vehicle's nose might be seen as a downside, but overall, the comments maintain a positive or neutral tone regarding the vehicle's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jonesy66 remarked that the car looks like an art piece and wishes the seller good luck with the sale. @Hurlys complimented the color combination, stating it is as nice as it gets. @autospa described the vehicle as having an absolutely spectacular specification. @Serj indicated that this model is the best version of the Continental, expressing clear enthusiasm. @FXRcR1 found the interior gorgeous despite noting a difference in shade. @pjshon simply referred to it as a sweet ride, while @GeneG praised the beauty of the car and its interior specifics. @Red99 also complimented the colors and presentation, expressing appreciation for the four-seat configuration and made inquiries about the original window sticker and service records.
Neutral: @MohrImports (The Seller) provided an introduction and expressed excitement about presenting the 2015 Bentley Continental GT Speed. They invited potential buyers to reach out for questions and mentioned the availability of a smog certificate for California bidders. @Shestonlawgroup asked whether there was a second key fob available, while @Thindor expressed love for the car's color. Throughout the comments, the seller actively responded to potential buyers' inquiries and ensured transparency by providing additional information about the vehicle's features and condition, including the type of veneer used in the interior.
Negative: @3Kees pointed out that the instrument panel's symmetry could be improved with different materials, specifically recommending figured maple over the current grey surface. @Red99 questioned why the Speed emblems may have been removed from the car and requested confirmation from the seller regarding the original window sticker and service records, suggesting the absence of such records may be uncommon for a car of this caliber. @DesertRaptor requested clarification on whether the air struts are original or have been replaced, indicating a concern about the car's maintenance history.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 describes the vehicle as absolutely beautiful, rare, and elegant with a striking Madison Gray Metallic exterior paired with a black leather interior. The comments from @lincolnsandcaddies and @hoppy18 also express admiration for the car's aesthetics, highlighting its gorgeous interior.
Neutral: Several commenters, including @lincolnsandcaddies and @MarkyMark640, raise questions about the features of the vehicle, particularly regarding the air conditioning system, which @mcqueens confirmed is not included, demonstrating honesty about the vehicle's specifications. @EKdad provides detailed observations about the seating and the convertible's top operation times, which suggests interest in the car's functionality, as well as asking pertinent questions regarding the windows.
Negative: The lack of air conditioning has raised some concerns among potential buyers, as indicated by @lincolnsandcaddies's inquiry about the AC compressor's absence. Commenters like @pdwall also noted a need for better pictures to ensure clarity about the vehicle's features. Overall, the discussions reflect some uncertainty regarding the car's condition and completeness.
![]() |
Modified, 42k-Mile 2013 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe Grand Sport
1G1YU2DW4D5103750
Lot 241060
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: The seller, @Aggi258, emphasizes the vehicle's solid condition and assures potential buyers that there are currently no issues with the airbag system or warning lights. They mention that although the seats were removed during modifications, this did not affect the vehicle's functionality. The seller also appears responsive to inquiries, demonstrating a commitment to customer service by offering to check on any concerns raised by potential buyers.
Neutral: Inquiries about the vehicle are being made, with @AB2112 asking for additional information regarding the ECU and @ViperACR questioning whether the airbag light appears in a specific driving video. The seller, @Aggi258, responds to both queries, providing details about previous mechanical modifications made by the former owner and confirming that they will conduct a follow-up check regarding the airbag light to ensure everything is in order.
Negative: There seem to be some concerns from prospective buyers regarding the previous modifications made to the vehicle, particularly about the airbag and the ECU. @ViperACR points out a specific moment in a video that raises questions about the airbag light, indicating potential unease about the vehicle's safety features. Overall, while the seller reassures buyers, the need for clarification on modifications and their implications may leave some buyers cautious.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 admires the beautiful color of the 300D, while @Becomethebull reflects nostalgically on his 22-year ownership of a 1976 model, praising its durability and reliability. @Carbine123 finds the vehicle awesome, and @70_duster notes that it is one of the most reliable Mercedes ever made, wishing the seller good luck with the sale. @RDeLombard appreciates that the air conditioning system was updated in 2023, and @sjoreel inquires about the effectiveness of the A/C, to which @SpecWerksLTD confirms it blows ice cold.
Neutral: @SpecWerksLTD addresses questions about the vehicle's features, confirming that the air conditioning was converted to R134a and is functioning properly. They explain the issues with the tachometer and antenna, providing insights into how repairs can be straightforward. @Detyler's inquiry about a dash cap is confirmed by @SpecWerksLTD, ensuring transparency regarding the vehicle's condition. Furthermore, they share that all door locks and the sunroof are working well, confirming that the odometer is functioning accurately.
Negative: @nushagak points out a rust issue located in the left rear trunk opening, which could be a concern for potential buyers. They also mention the difficulty of replacing the antenna mast, adding to the list of minor repairs the vehicle may need. This rust spotted by @nushagak is noted by @SpecWerksLTD as the only spot of corrosion, providing reassurance that there is no additional damage to the paint or other areas of the car.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GenauAutoWerks describes the 1966 Triumph TR4A IRS 5-speed as a beautiful and well-upgraded car, boasting features like a Moss Motors Eaton supercharger and a recently installed 5-speed transmission. Multiple commenters echoed this enthusiasm, with @awbeck calling it absolutely beautiful, @augopher affirming its gorgeousness, and @RiffRaff noting the car’s hard-to-match quality. @Mike_Breinin highlighted the car's special nature, mentioning the substantial performance boost from the Eaton supercharger, and @Dr.T praised the car’s gorgeous color and upgrades, recognizing it as a California vehicle throughout its life.
Neutral: Several contributors acknowledged the performance upgrades and condition of the TR4A while inquiring further about certain technical specifications. @Kmcsparren expressed interest in the retrofitted 5-speed manual gearbox, indicating that it is a very nice example with curb appeal. @FDH asked specific questions about the installation of the supercharger, highlighting the desire for technical clarity. Additionally, @968shelbs sought more information about the car's condition, specifically requesting photos of the top, expressing a common concern for accurate representations in light of the studio photos provided.
Negative: The feedback included some critical points, mainly focusing on technical details that left some potential buyers curious or skeptical. @FDH raised concerns over the engine's internal status and whether the bottom end had been rebuilt. @968shelbs also questioned the front bumper's design, indicating possible inconsistencies with other TR4s, which could suggest a lack of authenticity or proper restoration. Overall, these inquiries reflect a cautious perspective among some potential buyers, seeking additional assurances about the car's history and modifications.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle is described as a beautiful Silver targa with less than 6000 km, appealing to car enthusiasts who value low mileage and aesthetic appeal. @TONYM4836 (The Seller) confirms that everything on the car functions properly, which adds to the overall positive impression of the vehicle. The seller also mentions that the car comes with additional items such as the front plate filler, owners manual, and both roof panels, enhancing its value and completeness.
Neutral: There is a query from @66caddy824 regarding the availability of the front license plate filler plate, which @TONYM4836 (The Seller) promptly confirms is included. @neomusclefan inquires about the date codes on the tires and the functionality of the heads-up display, indicating an interest in the car's condition and features. The exchange of information suggests a healthy level of engagement and curiosity from potential buyers.
Negative: Concerns arise regarding the vehicle's ownership history, with @stepner questioning why there have been five owners despite the car being a relatively recent model. @TONYM4836 (The Seller) clarifies that the first three registrations were due to a dealer in Michigan, which raises some uncertainty about the car's past. Additionally, the mention of intermittent issues with the heads-up display could detract from buyers' confidence in the vehicle's reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @ApexAutoVault, the Seller, provides a glowing overview of the ’06 5.9 Cummins Mega Cab 4×4, describing it as a stunning vehicle with a legendary Cummins engine. The Seller highlights their satisfaction during their four-month ownership, praising the truck's clean frame and solid rockers, which showcase its good condition. They also mentioned recent mechanical updates including a new serpentine belt and alternator, ensuring that it is ready for the next owner, whether for towing or leisure purposes. The Seller's enthusiasm about the truck and its reliable performance truly shines through.
Neutral: Commenters are showing interest in obtaining more detailed information about the vehicle. @AAustin06 asks if more photos, especially of the underside, can be provided, expressing a desire to check for rust not visible in the current images. @pdoray14 inquires about the possibility of uploading videos, indicating a preference for visual confirmation of the truck's condition. @irhunter raises a technical question about the originality of a specific weld in one of the photos, demonstrating practical concerns regarding the truck's modifications or repairs.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the absence of detailed images and videos of the truck. @AAustin06 expresses uncertainty about rust under the vehicle, which they fear could affect its overall value and reliability. @pdoray14's request for videos also indicates a level of skepticism about the information provided and a need for further verification before committing to a purchase. Overall, the lack of certain visual details appears to lead to some hesitation among interested buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle's aesthetic and the seller's presentation, highlighting the beautiful photography and the overall appeal of the car. Commenters like @Bgs88 mentioned a personal connection to the car, emphasizing that it holds a special place in their heart. The car's potential is also noted, with @Frida pointing out that with the right modifications, like a proper ROW 2.7L MFI engine, the vehicle could significantly increase in value and provide an exciting driving experience. The general sentiment among enthusiasts is that this 1974 Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe is a well-maintained and desirable classic that could appeal to collectors.
Neutral: Several comments were factual in nature, discussing specific details and modifications of the car. For example, @nodriveraids provided clarification about the smog exemption status for the 1975 model year in California, while others like @David_P highlighted suspension specifics, such as RSR sway bars and turbo tie rods. The discussions also covered potential originality concerns with certain features such as mirrors and antennas. Although the conversation veered into technical specifications and modifications, there was a sense of mutual respect and appreciation for the car's history and rarity.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's originality and past modifications. User @jfcowell pointed out the possibility of bodywork and questions about the car's authenticity. There was a mention that certain elements, like the rear bumper and mirrors, may not be original, which could impact value for collectors. @KryptoF15 also questioned the accuracy of the engine's power rating, suggesting that there might be discrepancies in the vehicle's documentation. Overall, while there is appreciation for the car, a cautious approach regarding its condition and modifications was noted.
![]() |
Fuel-Injected 1962 Ford Galaxie 500 2-Door Sunliner Convertible 352 4-Speed
2G65X211802
Lot 241010
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Overall, many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, particularly praising its appearance and condition. @Dollycat3 highlighted the car's gorgeous design in classic Raven Black with a striking Red Crush vinyl interior. They appreciated the inclusion of the original wheels and hubcaps. @Wandering_Lens also showed enthusiasm for the vehicle's wing windows and envisioned it as an excellent cruiser for enjoying the fall months. The seller, @Engrtoy64, provided positive updates regarding the functionality of gauges, lights, and the power top, indicating that everything was in good working order without significant issues.
Neutral: Several comments focused on specific details regarding the vehicle's condition and performance. @glotz raised questions about possible overheating, transmission issues, and the general drivability of the car. @mikes440 inquired about the operation of various lights and gauges, indicating that the state inspection requirements in New York led them to seek confirmation on these aspects. @corvettom9 requested videos to better understand the engine's performance and cam specifications, which @Engrtoy64 confirmed availability of, indicating good communication from the seller.
Negative: While the general sentiment was positive, there were minor concerns indicated in the commentary. @mikes440 noted uncertainty about the reverse lights and highlighted the importance of functioning components for the annual state inspection. @Engrtoy64 acknowledged the presence of small oil leaks, stating they were minimal and did not accumulate. Additionally, while the paint job was mostly praised, there were mentions of minor flaws like chips and scratches along the front of the hood and fading in the red highlights of the trim, which could be a detractor for some potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the exceptional craftsmanship and beauty of the 1941 Plymouth Special Deluxe Wagon, with @Slam105 calling it a beautiful Woodie and @MNberg praising its rarity and design elements which surpasses that of other Woody cars. @Don3868 points out the stunning design details and color combination, while several commenters, including @TKC_MN, emphasize the impressive restoration work, specifically mentioning the purity of the craftsmanship in the interior space, which @MNberg likens to a church fresco. Overall, commenters express their admiration for the vehicle's artistry, historical significance, and the enjoyable experience of owning such a classic.
Neutral: The vehicle's sale process and the seller's support are noteworthy, with @TKC_MN discussing options for a pre-purchase inspection (PPI) and FaceTime viewings to ensure potential buyers are well-informed. The seller also mentions comprehensive storage and transportation assistance, indicating a commitment to customer service. @dangit56 and @MNberg inquire about potential videos of the vehicle to further engage interested buyers, reflecting a consistent flow of communication around the sale.
Negative: Skepticism arises from @dangit56, who notes that the car is being offloaded as it approaches 100,000 miles, prompting questions about its condition and the reasons for selling. However, @TKC_MN addresses this concern directly, clarifying that the current owner is simply ready to pass on the project rather than implying any issues with the vehicle itself. Overall, while one comment hints at potential drawbacks linked to the car's mileage, the overwhelming sentiment remains positive regarding its quality and desirability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @vfguy praised the vehicle for its attractive appearance and fuel efficiency, sharing that he has a similar model that serves as a great commuter car capable of achieving 30 mpg at highway speeds. He expressed confidence that the future owner of the vehicle will be very satisfied with their purchase. @CAGNASH, the seller, acknowledged @vfguy's positive remarks. Additionally, several interactions between @CAGNASH and other users showcased the seller’s willingness to clarify details about the car, including the upload of requested photos and a driving video, demonstrating prompt engagement with potential buyers.
Neutral: Commenters such as @Cayenne6MT and @pcg82 asked for more specific information and visual evidence regarding the vehicle’s condition, such as potential peeling on the radio head unit and the state of the bumper. @DukeDog1 raised a question about a known issue with balance shafts for similar models and appreciated @CAGNASH's clarifying response, while @corner24 corrected him on the specifics related to the model year. @Semsa70 inquired about an outstanding safety recall noted on CARFAX, along with questions about tire date codes and service records from @fadein73.
Negative: Concerns were voiced by several potential buyers regarding the vehicle's age and its maintenance history. @DukeDog1 emphasized the importance of addressing any balance shaft issues, noting the absence of documentation on the subject, which could deter buyers. @OR1217 further highlighted an open manufacturer safety recall related to the sunroof bonding, asking for confirmation about whether this issue was resolved, signifying caution among interested parties. These inquiries reflect a level of apprehension surrounding the vehicle's long-term reliability and safety.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed their admiration for the vehicle's color and overall aesthetic. @70_duster enthusiastically declared his love for the color, while @Vinipizzetta praised the coolness of the combination and noted the appeal of the hardtop feature. @Gonnawin1 shared their positive experiences with the same generation of Corvettes, emphasizing their reliability and enjoyable driving experience, particularly highlighting the unique color combination of the car in question. @NCRSmaniac fondly reminisced about the car's color being popular among prom dresses in the late '80s and early '90s, clearly appreciating the vehicle's charm and performance for the cost.
Neutral: The seller, @BigDogCars, provided detailed information about the car's condition and history, indicating that it is on consignment and part of a larger collection. They clarified that the vehicle has been well-maintained with limited usage over the years, primarily for shows and events. They also responded to questions regarding various components, such as tire age and electrical features, honestly addressing areas that might require attention, ensuring transparency for prospective buyers. The seller's thorough approach reflects an understanding of buyer concerns and a commitment to providing comprehensive information about the car's status.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's Passkey system, with @hooper recalling negative experiences with the security feature that could lead to operational issues. Another commenter, @rfrankov, highlighted potential issues with the Corvette logo cover on the warning light panel, questioning whether it might be hiding codes and emphasizing the need for pre-sale addressing of any vehicle concerns. Lastly, @QPI inquired about the condition of specific parts, such as the braking system and front ball joints, indicating potential maintenance needs that might deter some buyers wary of future repairs.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @FirstClassExotics (The Seller) reassured potential buyers that the vehicle is in excellent condition despite its history, stating that it drives great and has never been in an accident. This confidence reflects a belief that the car can continue to perform well for many more miles, suggesting it offers reliability and longevity.
Neutral: Commenters engaged in clarifying questions about the vehicle's features and specifications, such as @Miamiboy76 inquiring about the functionality of Apple CarPlay and @configurate asking about the spare tire and engine cover. Similarly, @richcasanova raised questions about the car's history and aftermarket parts, indicating a level of interest while also seeking specific information about the vehicle's authenticity and components.
Negative: @richcasanova expressed concerns regarding the vehicle’s history of having eight previous owners and short ownership duration, questioning whether this indicates hidden problems or catastrophic damage. Additionally, @Jensenkid97 criticized the accuracy of the vehicle listing in online presentation, showcasing dissatisfaction with the information provided. Such comments reflect apprehension among potential buyers regarding the vehicle's reliability and overall value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Raffi highlights the rarity and potential of the vehicle, stating that fewer than 100 units might remain. The car is noted to be in pretty good condition, with recommendations for sensitive refinishing that could elevate its design, along with a nod to its unique and well-done aesthetic given its size. @TheVintageCarGuy appreciates the oddity and uniqueness of small production number cars, indicating that this one could stand out at car exhibitions and gatherings.
Neutral: @GLWA,grubeguy comments on the sound of the engine likening it to a propeller spooling up, while @FX3_4 questions why the vehicle is labeled as a project. Comments from @GlenK and @Knuckles-R-Busted suggest mixed feelings towards the vehicle's design, with @Knuckles-R-Busted calling it a hybrid of various cars and @TriumphTR6Boy noting its interesting styling juxtaposition of Italian and British influences.
Negative: @HeavyTank77 humorously remarks on the unfortunate naming of the car associated with two natural disasters. @jtjm raises a practical concern about sourcing parts, specifically a windshield for the vehicle, and @lobster suggests that aesthetic improvements like larger wheels and better seating could significantly benefit the car. While the design is noted for uniqueness, there are undercurrents of doubt regarding practicality and usability in some comments.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters admire the overall aesthetics and quality of the truck. @RJJCAM (The Seller) highlights that the truck is rust-free with a cold AC and a new gas tank, emphasizing its desirability. @john82601 describes it as beautiful, noting it as one of their favorite body styles. Additionally, @Safa80 appreciates the clean build and the seller's positive reputation, while @AndreeL expresses serious interest, indicating a number of favorable attributes that have piqued their attention.
Neutral: Some questions and comments were focused on technical details and specifications. @Morgan3313 inquires about the lift size, while @Dudes brings up concerns regarding a damage report found in the Carfax. @AndreeL poses several questions regarding the truck's features, including axle gearing and rust conditions, indicating an intention to ensure the vehicle meets expectations. @Colin_D checks on the functionality of the hitch wiring for trailer lights, reflecting a practical approach to understand the vehicle's utility.
Negative: A few comments raise concerns about the truck's past and potential issues. @Dudes mentions a clicking or grinding noise from videos of the truck in 4WD, while @AndreeL asks if the truck has leaks or if there is any documentation for previous work done, demonstrating a cautious perspective. @celeritate questions the truck's paint job, suggesting the original color may be different than stated, indicating there may be some uncertainty regarding the integrity of the vehicle's presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has received significant updates and improvements, as indicated by its recent service history. Notable enhancements include a fresh engine and transmission with only 5 hours of usage since their rebuild, and a comprehensive overhaul of the SADEV gearbox. Several commenters praised the quality of the vehicle, including @HB92647 mentioning it looks Radical. The seller, @911r, provided detailed information on the spare parts included, which adds further value to the offering. This includes extra body panels, wheels, and various mechanical components that highlight the car's readiness for racing.
Neutral: Several commenters sought information about specific features and capabilities of the car. @Kurtgalchus inquired about the hours on the engine and gearbox, while @gas_draggy4b asked about the vehicle's weight. There was a discussion regarding the paddle shifters' functionality and the possibility of adding a passenger seat, with @msracing confirming the car's compatibility with a second seat and mentioning that the aerodynamic package is up-to-date with features from newer vehicles.
Negative: There were some concerns expressed about the vehicle's quick turnover on the market, as indicated by @boxovin questioning why it's back on the block after only two months. Additionally, @roadracingjimmy raised a concern regarding driver size and fitting comfortably in the vehicle, though it's noted by @911r that the car has ample room for taller drivers. Overall, there are mixed feelings about the car's performance and market presence based on these inquiries.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commentors have expressed admiration for the vehicle's power and handling capabilities. @rofandofy described it as 'immensely powerful and good handling,' indicating a positive experience with the bike's performance. This suggests that despite its age and storage conditions, the bike retains strong mechanical qualities that could appeal to enthusiasts looking for a robust motorcycle.
Neutral: @63GearHead and @Gooberz raised questions regarding the bike's operational readiness and storage conditions. The seller, @kctumbleweed, confirmed that the bike runs fine and has been started regularly to maintain its functionality despite not being ridden since last summer. @kctumbleweed also clarified the bike's storage conditions, noting that it was tarped for approximately 2.5 years and started occasionally, which may have helped preserve its mechanics and performance.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the condition of the tires and potential cosmetic damage from being tarped. @Gooberz inquired about the tires, leading @kctumbleweed to acknowledge that they are likely the originals and may need replacement. Additionally, @IslandGuy57 questioned the painted surfaces for damage due to being tarped, which @kctumbleweed responded positively to, stating there does not appear to be any noticeable damage. However, the age of the tires and uncertainty regarding cosmetic aspects highlight potential issues for prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the vehicle highlight its appealing aesthetics and nostalgic value. @cog_zoom expressed a fondness for the early Vanagon's color, while @rubenkincaid reminisced fondly about his own Vanagon, appreciating the practicality and beauty of this model. Additionally, @TVis noted the spaciousness of the vehicle, calling it the coolest option for transporting kids, with special mention of the unique corduroy seats. There's a shared enthusiasm for the Vanagon's distinct features; @argon3030 emphasized its pure form with details about its design.
Neutral: Several inquiries reflect curiosity about the vehicle's condition and performance. @chancecarl asked about the time it takes to go from 0-60 mph, indicating interest in its performance metrics. @cmoralejo (The Seller) provided clarification on this point, although uncertainty remained about the odometer and mileage, as discussed in comments by @Mr_Schneebly. Queries about the vehicle's registration and its non-operational status were also noted by @Malibu_1964 and others, seeking more context on its history and usage.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the vehicle's maintenance and longevity. @PolarFBear questioned the use of duct tape on hoses, expressing worry about potential drivability issues, especially in challenging terrain like the Rockies. The absence of regular maintenance, including smog checks and the length of time the vehicle has been off the road, was pointed out by @Mr_Schneebly, leading to skepticism about the Vanagon's roadworthiness as mentioned by @alexano94. Overall, there were signs of doubt regarding the vehicle's current state and reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @earlebird praised the vehicle as a nice-looking Series IV, recalling his experience selling similar models back in the 80s and 90s. He expressed curiosity about the power top functionality, indicating awareness of past issues with it and suggested that a cold start and driving video would be beneficial. @vsolomon1 (The Seller) confirmed that the power top does work but requires manual assistance to fully open and close, and he agreed to provide video content as requested.
Neutral: @WordMan shared knowledge about the vehicle's rear suspension, clarifying that it is independent rather than solid, and related it to C3 Corvette features. @vsolomon1 (The Seller) appreciated this feedback and acknowledged the update made to the listing to reflect the independent rear suspension. @bringatrailer confirmed this update was made, further enhancing the vehicle's listing details.
Negative: @PaPa8X pointed out a rusted chain on the underside of the car, requesting information about its purpose, which raised some concern regarding the vehicle's condition. @earlebird speculated that the chain might relate to an accident reported in the car's history, questioning its support function. In response, @vsolomon1 (The Seller) mentioned his limited expertise on this particular area but offered to check for more details and even suggested the option of a mechanical inspection to resolve any questions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @racerboy221 finds the vehicle attractive, noting its appealing 'resale red' color. The Seller, @MrMention, highlights the car's strong performance, especially praising its cold A/C, smooth transmission, and fully functional seatbelts and windows. @Bordeaux commends the vehicle's reliability, comfort, and speed, emphasizing its historical significance and enjoyment from driving it. MrMention further asserts that the car can drive long distances without issue, having successfully driven it from Phoenix to Vegas.
Neutral: @Heron raises concerns about the gaps in maintenance records, questioning the thoroughness of provided receipts, while @Rockster80 notes the significant absence of service history over a specific mileage range. The Seller, @MrMention, responds by explaining that the service records exist but were not adequately showcased in the photographs, offering to share more detailed information upon request. @cdwatnsu provides some technical inquiries about specific vehicle features, and MrMention reassures him about the functioning of various components, including the A/C and window mechanisms.
Negative: Some comments express skepticism about the car's maintenance history, with @Heron pointing out a lapse in records since 2013, and @Rockster80 voicing concerns regarding insufficient photographic evidence of the headliner and service history. The potential for quality issues is noted, with @cdwatnsu questioning various mechanical functions and any signs of clearcoat failure. While @MrMention addresses these concerns with reassurances, the lack of clarity in the previous documentation seems to cast a shadow on the vehicle's perceived reliability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments highlight the vehicle's stunning blue wrap, which many find attractive and eye-catching. @mike_747 noted the wrap as very attractive, while @SCUDERIAMC mentioned that the vehicle looks gorgeous in any color. The wrap's quality is endorsed by comments like those from @SCUDERIAMC, who praised the stunning color when viewed in sunlight, along with a solid Autocheck report showing no issues, which contributes to a positive vibe around its condition.
Neutral: Several commentators are seeking additional information about the vehicle. @Cosmo007 and @arsiwala both inquired about details such as clear pictures of wear on the dashboard and the timeframe and place of the wrap installation. @Fcracer17 requested the height of the driver’s door for garage accommodation. @HRIDHA asked about the condition of the alcantara interior, indicating a general curiosity about the vehicle's ongoing maintenance and specifications.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns regarding the vehicle's wrap and dashboard issues. @KilroyNo1 expressed dissatisfaction about covering the original Volcano Red with blue, while @SerottaD compared this to an unfavorable scenario. Additionally, @MikeB6161 pointed out issues with the dashboard, suggesting that the repair might be obscured and expressing skepticism about how much fix work may be needed. @blam23's comment was flagged as non-constructive, emphasizing the potential scrutiny around the car's condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @topduarte describes the vehicle as very nice, with only about 2,500 miles driven per year, indicating it is well kept. @Glwa notes that the color combination is appealing and conveys the impression of a well-maintained car. @yellowc7vert praises the LT-5 engine as one of the greatest ever produced and suggests that a high-mileage example like this one could be an affordable entry point for enthusiasts, also commenting that the car appears to be in nice shape.
Neutral: @don_maclennan (The Seller) confirms that no paint or body work has been done and explains that he replaced the entire clutch assembly due to a worn bearing. He also addresses concerns about the noisy flywheel, explaining that the aftermarket replacement does not dampen power pulses like the original dual mass flywheel. Other users, such as @wem5310 and @Nolyaw, inquire about the vehicle's functioning components and potential leaks, with @don_maclennan responding that everything works as it should and noting minor issues with the horn and paint cracks.
Negative: @Last-Triumph raises potential concerns about previous bodywork and the vehicle's smog test failure due to excess NO levels, which worries other commentors. @86targa asks about a stain on the seat back and carpet, which @don_maclennan admits he hadn't noticed previously. @AZSP33D also highlights possible delamination of the windshield as a concern and asks for clarification on weather stripping and actual emission readings from the failed smog test.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Craven noted the added legroom and trunk space, highlighting the vehicle's spaciousness. @aaron.perry (The Seller) confirmed that the trunk area is indeed quite large, emphasizing its practicality. Additionally, @HeavyTank77 praised the vehicle for having a 'pillowy ride', suggesting that it offers a comfortable driving experience reminiscent of older luxury cars. @aaron.perry (The Seller) excitedly stated that this is an awesome car, expecting that someone will appreciate its unique attributes.
Neutral: @RWW2 pointed out that the vehicle is not a Fleetwood Brougham, dating the model to modifications made after 1996, indicating a shift in automotive design. @wem5310 raised concerns regarding the vehicle being located in a flood disaster area and inquired about any potential flood damage, showing a practical approach to buying used vehicles. @aaron.perry (The Seller) provided reassurance, confirming that there has been absolutely no flood damage and that everything functions as it should, which seemed to alleviate @wem5310's concerns.
Negative: @wem5310 expressed initial apprehension about the car's history, indicating that the flood disaster area could be a potential red flag. This concern reflects a cautious attitude towards purchasing vehicles with uncertain backgrounds. Overall, while @RWW2's comment about the model's lineage might imply a downfall in quality from earlier versions, the responses generally focused on reassurances from the seller to quell any doubts.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Dollycat3 remarked on the vehicle's aesthetic appeal, calling it absolutely beautiful and praising its gorgeous color combination. @mchlsutton noted that it might have the cleanest undercarriage they have ever seen on a vintage FSJ, highlighting the impressive condition of the vehicle. @supertek echoed this sentiment, stating that the undercarriage is absolutely beautiful, indicating a high level of satisfaction with its visual presentation.
Neutral: @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) has provided transparency regarding the vehicle’s maintenance, mentioning that they will post receipts for the freshly rebuilt engine. In response to @RoyGreen's inquiry about the electronic features, the seller confirmed that a video will be posted to demonstrate the functionality of these components, which creates anticipation among potential buyers. Additionally, the seller informed that power windows all work and shared updates on the state of other features, indicating a well-maintained vehicle overall.
Negative: @RoyGreen raised concerns regarding the functionality of various electronic components, specifically asking if the power windows, locks, radio, and rear window worked properly. @choicedealsnc2017 (The Seller) did confirm some issues, noting that while the power windows function and the AC is working, the power mirrors are not operational and the door locks are somewhat lazy, which might deter potential buyers looking for a fully functional vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @sporty_amg praised the unique specifications of the vehicle, noting that they have the same options on their own car. They also appreciated the quality of the walk-through video and highlighted the usefulness of the 360 camera option. @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) emphasized the vehicle's rarity, mentioning that they specialize in sourcing unique and desirable cars from private sellers, and they are dedicated to providing smooth, transparent transactions as evidenced by their high Google review rating of 4.8/5.0 based on numerous five-star reviews from satisfied customers.
Neutral: @Collectibleclassics (The Seller) mentioned various services available for potential buyers, including nationwide shipping and the option for inspections through trusted local shops or services like Lemon Squad. They assured customers that their team is ready to support any inquiries as the auction drew to a close. The seller also reminded bidders about the commitment required when placing bids and the necessity of securing funding before the transaction, adding clarity to the purchasing process.
Negative: @Tino102 expressed concern about the absence of the car's emblems, specifically the 4MATIC and E400 labels. In response, @TexasMule noted that someone probably de-badged the vehicle, which is a common practice. This raised potential concerns over the vehicle's authenticity or history, indicating a possibility of alterations that may affect buyer confidence.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @BeemerNut appreciates the unique character and design of the GB500 bikes, which he has always admired. He notes the bike's reliability and potential for longevity with proper maintenance, indicating that it can become a classic collector's item. @LaGrasta also finds the bike stunning and shares the clean geometry and proportioned design that @57charlie recognizes as timeless. @MNberg highlights the GB500’s thrilling styling, comparing it to iconic racing bikes from the TT era, noting that collectors today are beginning to realize its value.
Neutral: @Rdbean2 (The Seller) confirms that the exhaust system appears to be original and offers to provide additional photos, demonstrating a commitment to transparency in the sale. He also shares information about the tires, which were manufactured in 2021, adding to the bike's credibility. Various commenters express interest and acknowledge the competitive pricing of the bike, with @kansaspaul noting his concern over the budget but recognizing the quality of the bike.
Negative: @MNberg mentions that the sales of the GB500 were sluggish initially due to overpriced competition and a lack of appreciation in export markets. @ED_C points out the bike's limitations, stating it's not a speedster but still enjoyable on secondary roads, hinting at its modest performance. @Michael_Spark and @RCDore express concerns about market trends, with @RCDore implying that the market might not regain its previous highs, which could impact the bike's value in the future.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Tony7673 (The Seller) is actively engaging with potential buyers, indicating a willingness to answer questions and provide information about the vehicle. The Seller mentions that the truck has never been exposed to rain or snow, which suggests that it has been well cared for and maintained under ideal conditions. This aspect can appeal to buyers looking for a vehicle in optimal condition.
Neutral: @Wjfoti1 expresses interest in seeing driving and cold start videos of the truck, which is common for prospective buyers wanting to gauge the vehicle's performance and condition. The Seller provides an update regarding the videos, mentioning that unfavorable weather conditions have delayed their upload. This indicates that the Seller is responsive but is currently hindered by external factors from showcasing the vehicle further.
Negative: There are no significant negative comments regarding the vehicle itself in this exchange. However, the mention of poor weather might indicate some dissatisfaction from potential buyers who are eager to see the vehicle in action but are unable to do so due to the Seller's circumstances. Overall, the lack of negative feedback suggests that the vehicle is generally viewed in a positive light.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong enthusiasm for the Oldsmobile Final 500 Edition Aurora, with @90IROC (The Seller) highlighting its rarity and pristine condition, having just one owner and low mileage. Many commenters, like @Pacer82 and @PetrolInVeins, express admiration for the car's unique styling and beautiful Dark Cherry Metallic paint, suggesting it could still perform well in today's market. The interior's quality was also praised, with one user reminiscing about their own positive experiences with similar models, emphasizing the smooth and quiet ride they provided.
Neutral: Several users asked questions regarding the car's condition and features, which @90IROC (The Seller) addressed thoroughly, confirming that all components are functional including the moonroof and audio system. Comments about the tires and their condition brought up by @Jimpete were also acknowledged, noting that they are high-quality Pirelli P-Zeros with good tread life remaining. The discussions conveyed a sense of interest in the car's history, with comments about its collector's kit and other included features demonstrating curiosity about the vehicle's completeness.
Negative: Skepticism was raised about potential issues with the vehicle, particularly regarding overheating and head gasket problems that affected some other models, as mentioned by @HenryVal. There were also concerns expressed about the visible smudge on the steering wheel, noted by @Jimpete, and whether any strong cleaning agents had been used to maintain the car's immaculate appearance. Overall, while enthusiasm was prominent, certain doubts regarding the car's long-term reliability and maintenance presence were evident.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle, highlighting its nice appearance and rare qualities. @Arthur2020 (The Seller) received friendly remarks, such as 'Nice looking car!! GLWTA!!' from @jaydubau and 'Nice color combo – GLWTA!' from @69_911e, both indicating a positive reception of the car's aesthetics. Additionally, @mini2nut noted the rarity of a 42-year-old, rust-free, 1-owner Porsche, suggesting that the vehicle has valuable qualities worth highlighting.
Neutral: The seller, @Arthur2020, provided clarifications regarding some concerns raised by potential buyers. For instance, they mentioned that any perceived color differences in the seats might be attributed to lighting or uneven wear rather than damage. @Twelvepaws requested more photos of the seats in different lighting to better evaluate the color variations. The seller also acknowledged issues with the dash, stating that it is slightly warped, and provided information about their aware of the paint issues on the fender, explaining that it looks like paint splatter from another color.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns regarding the vehicle's condition. @Fargie pointed out what appeared to be a warped and wavy dash, while @Frankieballs questioned whether the seller had ever attempted chemical solvents for paint issues over the years. @jgeis1 discussed the potential need to repaint the fender, implying skepticism about the vehicle's current aesthetic condition. @Arthur2020 (The Seller) clarified that despite various attempts to remedy the paint problem, a body shop determined that the fender would indeed require repainting.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @tomcolt3 expressed happiness about the use of the car, remarking on the good mileage the vehicle has seen. @Kcoffey3000 mentioned admiration for the color, while @porschechris123, who has serviced the car since 2019, confirmed that the vehicle is well cared for and matches the seller's description. @Garybadgerguy highlighted the car's readiness for summer adventures and winter driving, inviting potential buyers to ask questions and emphasizing the extensive maintenance conducted over the years, estimating over $30,000 of work done in the past seven years. He also noted the applied paint protection film and details about the replacement of the driver-side leather seat, enhancing the vehicle's condition.
Neutral: @joesailor provided a practical solution for the headlight lenses, suggesting a local service for replacements, which shows awareness of routine maintenance needs. @harrcorb raised a question about the car's new transmission, and @BA_ixixi.i shared insights about the potential failure of properly maintained PDK systems, providing context for such issues, while @Garybadgerguy responded honestly about his experience with the previous transmission problems and reassured that no issues have arisen since the replacement. The overall sentiment regarding the car's performance and reliability seems cautiously optimistic, with both comments acknowledging its past challenges but also its current well-maintained state.
Negative: Concerns were raised about the transmission replacement with @harrcorb questioning the necessity for it, reflecting potential apprehensions from buyers regarding reliability. @BA_ixixi.i corroborated this by sharing an experience of PDK failure, which, although acknowledged as rare, could deter some buyers from pursuing the vehicle. The mention of previous issues, despite being resolved, may create doubt in potential buyers' minds about the car's overall reliability and maintenance history as @Garybadgerguy shared his personal struggles with the vehicle prior to the transmission replacement.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @boaboyoz praised the vehicle as a super fresh Florida Evo Final Edition, describing it as very rare and cool. @Lotsofcurveslover and @ramsfan00 expressed their admiration, with the latter calling it the 'holy grail.' @70_duster also appreciated the blue color, believing it would do well in the auction. @GoyoGrillo shared a personal account, stating that they have seen the car in person and found it to be absolutely immaculate. Overall, many comments conveyed excitement and respect for the car's condition and rarity.
Neutral: @Bulletmotorsportsinc, the seller, provided detailed information about the auction process, including bidding rules, potential storage fees, and shipping options. @Marcz55 discussed the reasoning behind the absence of Recaro seats in the final edition, referencing airbag regulations and recalling that other regions received different features. @Youngtimerclassics also contributed to this point, suggesting that finding Recaro seats from Canada could be an option.
Negative: @4g63 raised concerns about a lack of certain parts and features that they believed should have been included, claiming the car is missing elements like BBS wheels and Recaro seats. @e28oo00oo critiqued @4g63's comments as unconstructive, emphasizing that while parts can be hard to find, many aftermarket options are available. @yma10 corrected misconceptions about standard features on the Evo X, specifically the rear wiper and MOMO steering wheel, suggesting that the stock configuration and ride height were appropriate for the car's purpose.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @opportun praised the vehicle as one of the top cars they've driven, complimenting its fantastic performance and rare color. @Z282SLO mentioned the impressive rarity of the NRING model, offering a memorable driving experience characterized by superb handling and explosive acceleration. The car's performance features, including engine sound and driving modes, were noted to bring joy to anyone behind the wheel, making it a bucket list experience. Furthermore, @JAlfa shared their satisfaction with the everyday usability of the standard seats, emphasizing the car's overall excellence as a sports sedan without the need for pricier options.
Neutral: @Adrian_24, the seller, provided clarity about previous cosmetic damage that was repaired by the dealer, indicating an honest approach to disclosing the vehicle's history. The discussion also revolved around the choices made by previous owners in terms of optional features like the Sparco seats and carbon ceramic brakes, with insight from @Z282SLO and @GiuliaGoolia regarding how consumers prioritize expense when selecting options on such high-performance vehicles. The seller also mentioned having an extended warranty which, while not included in the sale, demonstrated their dedication to maintaining the car in excellent condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by @AlfaDave regarding the possible unaddressed maintenance issues, particularly the vehicle's belts and minor rear-end damage. @Z282SLO suggested that the engine bay cleanliness could be an issue, potentially detracting from the car's appeal to bidders. Meanwhile, @AndyisG expressed concerns about the car being stored outside without a garage, which could affect its condition. @99xracer noted that the vehicle had previously failed to sell on another platform at a high price, hinting at lingering doubts about its marketability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Comments about the 1974 Honda CB350F exude admiration for its aesthetics and performance. @Ozzybud describes it as a 'very beautiful example,' highlighting the unique rainbow metallic paint that becomes apparent in sunlight. Enthusiasts like @youbugme and @Kasindy affirm the fun and refined riding experience this model offers, with @youbugme sharing that their own experience is one of thrill, especially when revving up to 10K rpm. @ThePetrolVault emphasizes the bike's smooth engine and enticing exhaust note, enhancing its appeal among classic motorcycle fans. The seller also notes the rarity of the original paperwork, making it a more attractive purchase for collectors.
Neutral: There are remarks that center on the bike's interesting history and some minor concerns. @Ozzybud raises questions about the numbers etched into the tank and engine parts, looking for clarity on why this alteration occurred, while @Kasindy mentions that these numbers could be removed easily by a chrome shop. @ThePetrolVault responds to @Ozzybud, explaining the previous owner’s context regarding the number issue, acknowledging the subtlety of the markings, which adds a layer of backstory to the bike. Additionally, the mention of some original parts being hard to find, like the OEM fuel petcock, is noted alongside tips for potential replacements.
Negative: On a less positive note, some frustrations regarding the bike's condition are voiced. @Ozzybud expresses concern about the ruined paint job caused by the etched numbers, pointing to a potentially detracting issue for buyers. @youbugme mentions common problems such as cracking triple top clamps and the difficulty in sourcing original parts, emphasizing the challenges of maintaining such a classic. @Kasindy echoes this sentiment by highlighting the scarcity of certain components, indicating that while the bike is desirable, acquiring authentic parts can be problematic, possibly deterring some prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster praises the Cragar wheels, expressing that they look great. @Taterty mentions that anyone who buys the car will have a fantastic vehicle at a price significantly lower than the stock cost. @Beepbeep69 notes that it's a good week for 69 Plymouths on the platform, contributing to a positive sentiment around such classic cars.
Neutral: @rainbowthunder01 asks for a better picture of the tachometer located in front of the shifter but @crownconcepts clarifies that it is actually an oil pressure gauge. @dmason65 inquires about the AC functionality, to which @crownconcepts responds that it was recharged recently and blows cold air. @MountainCustoms seeks additional photos from prior refurbishment and historical information on the motor and color, while @crownconcepts assures that they have a lot of documentation since the current owner acquired the car in 2017.
Negative: @dmason65 expresses concern that it seems too early to invest heavily in a car that lacks a TAG. @Cuz questions the original color of the exterior and interior, indicating uncertainty without the fender tag. @InDaClub2024 mentions difficulty in determining the original colors, as @crownconcepts cannot provide more photos or details from the 2021 refurbishment, potentially leaving some buyers hesitant due to insufficient historical information.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @meandmyredferrari expressed appreciation for the car, highlighting its great appearance and noting the rarity of seeing an original in such good condition. They also remarked on the inclusion of original components, which is helpful for preservation or restoration. @hbjacket described the car as cool and expressed confidence that the future owner will enjoy it.
Neutral: @EuropaS2 raised a technical question regarding the motor size, expressing curiosity but still acknowledging the car's nice looks. @gas_draggy4b appeared to confirm the car's authenticity as a Lotus rather than a kit and asked various details about it, suggesting interest without offering strong opinions. @JPSLotus clarified the car's chassis as a Series 2, indicating variations might exist due to upgrades over the years.
Negative: Some comments raised concerns about the appropriateness of certain modifications, like the larger tail lights on the car. @SENC highlighted that while the updates might be seen as improvements, they suggest that the car has undergone significant changes from its original form. @ojo3985 mentioned discrepancies in the compression results, indicating possible engine issues that may need further clarification.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @83alfa (The Seller) has expressed confidence in the vehicle, describing the 2010 Jaguar XF as a smooth driving car and assuring potential buyers that they will be pleased with it. The seller emphasizes the vehicle's comfort, power, and maintenance history, noting that all work has been conducted at reputable dealerships and repair shops. The value of the car is highlighted alongside its features, such as the spacious trunk and excellent engine performance, making it an appealing choice for enthusiasts and first-time Jaguar owners alike.
Neutral: Comments from @SmodKing raise some important questions about the vehicle's maintenance and performance, specifically regarding the water pump, cooling system, and potential transmission issues. The seller, @83alfa, provides detailed answers to these inquiries, confirming that the water pump and cooling components have been updated with more reliable parts. Although the seller acknowledges the presence of a slight "ZF lurch," they emphasize that it is not a significant issue, maintaining that the car operates smoothly and satisfactorily.
Negative: Concerns regarding potential problems with the car's cooling system and transmission have been expressed. @StypeJag mentioned apparent hail damage in some pictures, while @SmodKing pointed out the known issues with aging Jaguar parts that could affect the vehicle's reliability. There is also a subtle worry from potential bidders regarding the price point, as indicated by @SmodKing, who noted that bids approaching $6,200 may be near the upper limit for this model given its mileage and the existing issues.
![]() |
20-Years-Owned 1966 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 427 4-Speed
194676S126794
Lot 241054
Private Party
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters expressed admiration for the vehicle and its features. @NCRSmaniac mentioned that the car reminded him of a memorable scene from 'Goodfellas', showcasing its impressive appearance. @C3Lee also complimented the car's beautiful stance and resale red color. Additionally, @GBRBiLL reminisced about owning a similar car in the past, asserting that this model looks great and stirs nostalgia. @Chevy78 (The Seller) highlighted that the vehicle has been well-maintained with extensive documentation and features such as a rebuilt engine and a 411 Positraction rear end, which enthusiasts appreciate.
Neutral: Several comments revolved around inquiries and clarifications regarding the vehicle's specifications. @Sinan asked about the engine and repair history, while @BbOoBb sought information on original paperwork to verify authenticity. @doughjelm pointed out that the wheel spinners were incorrectly placed and needed adjustment. @earlebird questioned the horsepower of the 427 engine, to which @Chevy78 (The Seller) confirmed it is rated around 425 to 450 hp, suggesting operational performance details that potential buyers might value. There were also discussions about known features like the side exhaust and rear end ratio, displaying a general interest in the car's specifications.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, there were some concerns mentioned about the vehicle. @doughjelm noted that the left front and right rear wheel spinners were on backwards, indicating attention to detail that the seller initially overlooked. @rainbowthunder01 expressed concern about cracks shown in the pictures, which prompted clarifications from @Chevy78 (The Seller) that they were only minor paint cracks, not structural issues. @1969L88 raised a potential issue regarding the differential half shafts, indicating that there may be a discrepancy between what is typically found in big block cars and what is present in this vehicle, leading to speculation about its original components.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters have expressed strong enthusiasm for the 2002 BMW M5, with many describing it as an incredible example and the best sports sedan ever made. @SwissMovement noted that it looks great as a potential daily driver, while @carlosartur praised it as the cleanest and most well-presented E39 M5 they have ever seen. @hjohanss highlighted it as the best car ever made, reflecting a consensus among enthusiasts on the car's high quality and desirability. The attention to detail in the listing, including the detailed service history and high-quality images, was also well-received, with @architraz complimenting the photography.
Neutral: The selling process appears to be well-organized, with @1600veloce (The Seller) offering personalized services such as in-person inspections and virtual walkarounds. They provided extensive information on the vehicle's condition and history, emphasizing their commitment as a dedicated seller with a strong track record on the platform. Some potential buyers, like @krishan and @tmlesko, showed interest in additional details such as cabin sounds and the condition of the underside of the car, indicating a desire for more transparency in the vehicle's condition.
Negative: Concerns were raised by some commenters regarding the vehicle's underside and service history documentation. @tmlesko pointed out that the pictures of the underside looked inconsistent and questioned the thoroughness of the maintenance records, suggesting they might have been recorded hastily. @tmlesko's inquiries about jacking up the car to verify the jack points' condition were met with resistance from the seller, leading them to withdraw interest. This unease was echoed by others who demanded more concrete evidence of the car's condition, indicating a level of skepticism among potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg praises the vehicle as "Absolutely lovely TR with fantastic color combo" and expresses their admiration with an enthused "Bellissima!". @Gearhed64 describes the color combo as "classy", and @Primo2013 agrees, also appreciating the fuse box upgrade as a significant advantage. @A1phaet0mega (The Seller) shares that they inspected the vehicle only briefly before purchase, indicating confidence in its condition, and provides detailed paint meter readings to assure potential buyers about the car's authenticity.
Neutral: Several commenters inquire about specific details regarding the vehicle. @septicore highlights the vibrant colors while @Nolyaw requests paint meter readings for quality assurance. @veedub00 seeks clarification on the exhaust setup and potential catalytic converters, essential information for prospective buyers in terms of emissions. @A1phaet0mega (The Seller) responds to inquiries, providing background information about previous services on the car since its purchase, including maintenance records dating back to 2014 and the car's history of ownership.
Negative: Conversely, some commenters raise concerns about the lack of verified accident history and the absence of paint meter readings, which could affect the car's perceived value. @collectorsupport expresses skepticism, noting that such readings are critical for a vehicle on auction sites, while @Nolyaw insists on their importance due to personal experiences with paintwork issues. @HAPPY suggests that while the car appears good, paint readings can be misleading, and that the car's age might inherently come with its own set of imperfections.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @nra0920 commented on the vehicle's aesthetic, describing it as a "beautiful car." Additionally, @Mysticbob recognized the quality of the car and expressed appreciation towards the seller, emphasizing that many potential buyers ask questions in the comments for transparency, suggesting that the car's appeal is well-regarded by the community.
Neutral: @MajikMD asked several questions regarding the car's condition, including inquiries about the original tires, any trouble codes or warning lights, and the presence of any noticeable rock chips or scratches. He requested close-up photos for better detail, indicating his interest in the car but hesitance about aspects that may affect its value.
Negative: In response, @GarthLuke (The Seller) confirmed that the tires are indeed original and mentioned that there is a small filled rock chip in the windshield. However, he also admonished @MajikMD for not using the contact seller button for inquiries, implying a preference for direct communication instead of public comments. This response may suggest some frustration on the seller's part regarding how questions are handled.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DonPatrizio praised the vehicle's attractive color and favorable wheels, while @Mongoose55 expressed admiration for the classy interior color. The seller, @Rarecars, highlighted the vehicle's outstanding condition, emphasizing its maintenance history and low mileage, which adds appeal to potential buyers, urging them to consider this well-kept SUV for the auction.
Neutral: @IWantEveryCar raised a question about the state of the steering wheel, hinting at possible discoloration or just dirt. @Jdub1218 inquired about a flickering map display on the dashboard, seeking clarification on its frequency during normal driving as opposed to when recording. The seller responded that the flickering is only a video-related issue, ensuring transparency in communication with potential bidders.
Negative: @RobertDaniel expressed concerns about maintenance timing, questioning the last oil change and battery condition, as well as the potential for odors from smoking, which were addressed by the seller. @Quackbury challenged the seller on the missed annual oil change and raised questions about other maintenance neglect, critiquing the choice of tires as a concern for serious bidders. In response, @Rarecars reassured that the vehicle has been well-maintained at a specialized shop and committed to addressing the oil change and brake fluid replacements.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Jim93428 (The Seller) provided an extensive history of the 1932 Packard Rumble Seat Coupe Model 902, detailing its impressive restorations and multiple awards, underscoring its high quality and desirability among collectors. Commentors such as @JAY-Z praised the craftsmanship and materials used, highlighting that the car's elegance cannot be fully appreciated through pictures alone. @boaboyoz and @Dollycat3 both echoed sentiments of admiration, with @boaboyoz stating it is an impressive example and @Dollycat3 calling it absolutely stunning, further showcasing how much the vehicle resonates with enthusiasts.
Neutral: Several questions arose regarding specifics about the Packard's current condition and history. @James57 raised concerns about the car's operating condition given its limited mileage since 2018, seeking clarity on the gas tank's status and other maintenance questions. @elipper sought assurance regarding the operational capabilities and was cautious about bidding due to anxiety about purchasing remotely, sharing a common concern among potential buyers. @Dairyman also queried the rationale behind the preservation awards despite significant restorations, indicating a confusion that existed around the award eligibility criteria.
Negative: Some concerns were voiced about the vehicle, particularly the functionality of certain components. @elipper immediately noticed the absence of windshield wiper arms and @James57 requested detailed information on the Packard's operational conditions. Additionally, @Jim93428 acknowledged that while the electric fuel pump is functional, the mechanical pump is inactive, which might deter some buyers who prefer fully operational mechanisms. @Dairyman's doubts regarding the preservation awards after multiple restorations also highlighted skepticism about the car's authenticity and value to some observers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters expressed admiration for the Tatra 75, highlighting its unique design and engineering achievements. @arswaim noted the technical marvel of the vehicle, particularly its differential. Commenters like @porkpiehat and @SSN-685 appreciated the historical significance of the car, emphasizing its survival and intriguing background as a piece of automotive history. @NCboatrx referred to the car as very beautiful, while @Mordizzle shared excitement about the vehicle's features, like the wiper motors, demonstrating a keen interest in its details.
Neutral: Comments varied regarding some of the vehicle's specifics and usability. @Linksleyrover pointed out practical issues such as the placement of modern indicators and accessibility of the boot, suggesting a need for some repairs before use. Questions about tire age were raised by @OKA, reflecting a consideration of the vehicle's condition, while @jimreillyjmr sought clarity on potential issues due to its status as a museum piece, addressing concerns about dried seals or varnish in the fuel system.
Negative: Some commenters raised concerns about specific elements of the Tatra 75 that might undermine its usability and presentation. @Linksleyrover mentioned the need to address missing parts and practical limitations, which could affect the driving experience. @jimreillyjmr criticized the included music in the auction video, preferring the sounds of the car itself, indicating that some presentation choices might not resonate with all viewers. @Merc_s55's comment about the vehicle being unfamiliar reflected a broader sentiment where some might not find it appealing or relevant, considering it outside their knowledge base.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CarLover57 praised the vehicle's beauty and inquired about its functionality with the gauges and lighting, indicating an appreciation for thoroughness. @boaboyoz described the Thunderbird as a 'magnificent' example and expressed good wishes for the sale. @FlyPanther also admired the collection as a whole, highlighting the aesthetic appeal of the vehicles.
Neutral: @plasticdr (The Seller) provided detailed responses addressing inquiries about the car's condition, stating that while all gauges and lights work, there is a small leak of power steering fluid. The seller shared details about the vehicle's history, emphasizing its curation process and the owner's passion for automotive excellence. The seller also explained the features of the car and its collection context, reassuring potential buyers about the vehicle's functionality and history.
Negative: @birddoc pointed out a visual flaw with the louver trim being upside down and asked about the original carburetor, indicating potential concerns about authenticity. @mtbird66 raised several technical questions, expressing doubt regarding the car's exhaust system and functionality of various components like the radio and wipers, while highlighting a potential issue with the blinker not returning properly. These comments reflect skepticism among potential buyers regarding the car's overall readiness and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @FlagpondBill (The Seller) describes the vehicle as an excellent bike in like-new condition, kept in an air-conditioned garage throughout its life. He emphasizes his extensive experience with motorcycles, claiming it's his favorite after 75 years of riding. @97Stang adds that the bike looks really nice, expressing interest and wishing good luck to the seller. Additionally, @Miles52 appreciates the videos shared by @FlagpondBill (The Seller) showcasing the bike's cold start and engine running, indicating his potential interest in the purchase.
In terms of the bike's maintenance and features, @FlagpondBill (The Seller) assures potential buyers that proper care has been taken, providing documentation for service records completed at Brandon Harley Davidson. He mentions added accessories like a Harley security system and a garage door opener that enhance the bike's functionality. Commenters, such as @beemerrider, complement the bike's condition and express admiration for the seller's maintenance efforts over the years while asking questions about its service history, oil changes, and the condition of the tires.
Some neutral comments focus on the technical aspects of the sale process, including @997GuyfromDubai's request for a video of the bike starting and running, which @FlagpondBill (The Seller) attempts to fulfill amidst weather challenges. @beemerrider's inquiry regarding any scratches or blemishes indicates a desire for transparency, which @FlagpondBill reassures by stating there are none. However, there is some concern regarding the original tires and their age, with @FlagpondBill acknowledging their condition but indicating they should be changed due to inactivity since his health issues. Overall, potential buyers seem interested yet cautious, seeking assurance about the bike's maintenance.
Neutral:
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Slam105 expressed strong admiration for the vehicle, describing it as having a very attractive color combination. @Dollycat3 praised the car as a super Deluxe in gorgeous Lochaven Green over brown leather, highlighting its multiple award-winning status. @Hoppy18 found the automobile beautiful, particularly admiring its rich color, and even expressed a desire to own it alongside a classic Porsche for family outings and date nights. @DocMGL imagined the car in a local parade, believing it would impress any dignitaries present. Overall, comments emphasize the car's aesthetic appeal and prestigious recognition.
Neutral: @BigRedMachine (The Seller) provided insights about the car's history and current condition. He welcomed auction participants and conveyed pride in offering a vehicle with a notable history, although he acknowledged it was an older restoration. He confirmed that the car is not on consignment and stated that it has been on display in his showroom. Additionally, he addressed various inquiries regarding the car's provenance and responded to potential buyers, indicating a detailed knowledge of the vehicle's current care and functionality.
Negative: @Schwartz raised several questions about the car's restoration, maintenance history, and original specifications, indicating some concerns regarding the lack of detailed provenance. @stearman464 also inquired about the potential issues with the car's paint, given its age, asking whether there was any cracking or checking in the lacquer. @DocMGL expressed disappointment about the absence of air conditioning, highlighting the unusual climate needs in the desert but also noting the convertible's appeal. These comments point out some uncertainties and concerns related to the vehicle's history and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @CMCraig describes the vehicle as an honest and mostly original Ghia, emphasizing its elegant color combination and calling it a nice survivor. @TJC45 agrees, appreciating the color and charm of the car. The seller, @cashmad, expresses commitment to transparency, stating he will provide accurate information and photos as needed to reassure potential buyers of the vehicle's condition. @Ghiaride and @Toxicarl also share their admiration for the car's original features and functionality while contributing valuable insights regarding its specifications and modifications.
Neutral: Comments from @More_Cowbell regarding the car's sale photos being taken in a cemetery, suggesting it’s more of an unconventional choice than outright negative. @chrismartin1813, @jeffberly1825, and @ChromedOut1998 ask about the title and export processes due to its Canadian status, to which @cashmad responds clarifying the steps buyers must take, showing he is approachable and willing to assist. @CamShaft1969 and @Gazolba discuss the vehicle's registration implications in Canada and the importance of its odometer, hinting at potential buyer concerns rather than outright objections.
Negative: Some comments express concerns about the vehicle's condition. @SamCarter points out that several lower seams appear filled, raising questions about the quality of past repairs. @Frankieballs inquires if the clock works, indicating the presence of minor worries for prospective buyers regarding functional parts. @DNK and others discuss shipping costs and logistics for cross-border transport, reflecting on complications that could arise. Overall, while the concerns and inquiries are constructive and seek clarity, they highlight potential worries about modifications and functionality.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Hasbr0 praised the vehicle for its 'sweet', 'clean', and 'pristine' appearance, noting it is well put together. @mike_rockwell complimented the build quality, calling it a 'kool build' with a 'perfect profile' and 'top chop'. @duanesrides appreciated the vehicle's overall look, expressing enthusiasm and thanks for the videos shared by the seller. @Eljefferacing shared that the vehicle has been a personal pride for approximately nine years, emphasizing its performance, comfort, and the quality of parts used in the build, further providing details about its engine and custom features.
Neutral: @SVTerminator04 inquired about the paint code or color name, to which @Eljefferacing responded that the car is painted in 'Hugger Orange' from the 1969 Camaro era. @Bauback asked about the steering column installation and whether it is powered or manual, receiving confirmation from the seller that it operates nimbly without power steering and that all components are new builds. @duanesrides posed several questions regarding the vehicle's history, cold start videos, and title ownership, receiving thorough answers from the seller, including confirmation of a clean title in the seller's name.
Negative: @Vscheiter questioned whether the vehicle has windows, to which @Eljefferacing clarified that it does not, highlighting that it is designed for 'open air rodding'. Additionally, @duanesrides raised potential concerns regarding the need for receipts for major components and leaks or overheating issues, although the seller did not indicate any problems, noting there are no issues to address with the car's condition. @duanesrides also expressed a desire for a photo of the car with the top down, indicating some concerns about the stowage, which the seller admitted he hasn't done due to agility issues.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @DrivenMotorsports (The Seller) praised the vehicle as a very rare manual transmission model that runs and drives great, noting the impressive sound of the M6 engine. @sjohnsto18 highlighted the rarity of the car, mentioning that it is one of only 323 E63 manual transmission coupes produced worldwide, and emphasized the shared platform with the E60 M5 which has a solid reputation once common issues are resolved. This suggests that the car has both unique value and potential for reliability if properly maintained, providing an optimistic view of its overall worth.
Neutral: Comments reflect a mix of questions and general observations about the vehicle's history and maintenance. @pchludil inquired about the maintenance records, specifically asking if the engine bearings had been replaced—a common concern for these engines. @DrivenMotorsports (The Seller) acknowledged the lack of service records and mentioned plans for an oil analysis, which indicates an intention to ensure the vehicle's performance quality. This exchange showcases an interest in the car's condition but does not lead to a definitive conclusion about its reliability.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's maintenance history and the potential for engine issues. @pchludil pointed out the legendary issues with engine bearings for these models, emphasizing the importance of knowing whether they have been replaced. @DrivenMotorsports (The Seller)'s admission that the service records did not accompany the car leaves some doubt about its past care. This uncertainty might deter potential buyers who prioritize a well-documented service history, particularly for a performance vehicle where maintenance is crucial.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reveal a strong admiration for the vehicle, highlighted by @Showcase78's enthusiastic remark, 'Beautiful!', which sets a positive tone. @bhardiman noted that it’s one of the nicest R129s seen on the platform, complimenting the panoramic roof, while @acad23 and @JustaGlitch echoed similar sentiments, calling it a 'stunner' and expressing excitement over its features. The seller, @ExclusiveMotorClub, emphasized the car's exceptional condition and meticulous care, further promoting its appeal with statements about the rare triple black configuration and impressive service history.
Neutral: Several comments raised questions regarding specific aspects of the vehicle, as seen in @zildjian11's detailed observations on its condition and maintenance history. There were inquiries about the soft top's hydraulic system and the authenticity of some modifications, indicating an interest in its overall reliability but not diminishing its appeal. The seller, @ExclusiveMotorClub, consistently responded with transparency, indicating service records and clarifying concerns regarding the vehicle's condition and repairs.
Negative: While the comments were largely favorable, some concerns were noted, particularly around minor imperfections and maintenance issues. @zildjian11 pointed out the need for newer lug bolts and checks for potential rust, while @jordane raised questions about the fuel system and soft top service. These mixed reviews hint at the need for potential buyers to assess the vehicle closely despite its allure. Overall, while the critiques were mild, they serve as a reminder of the importance of thorough vetting when considering such rare vehicles.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @70_duster praised the vehicle's stance and wished the seller good luck with the auction, while @moobity complimented the car's documentation. @mflee92 expressed optimism about its value, hoping that a 'modernized' build wouldn't alter its classic appeal. @Espanolie highlighted the vehicle's aesthetics, noting the appealing 90s color combination and the 'awesome' hardback seats. @MPM97turbo described it as a 'well built/optioned 4S' ideal for driving, which many agreed makes for entertaining auctions. @mikemcquiston17 admired the trunk liner's design and sought purchasing information from the seller, which was provided promptly, and @Garbo_Yota inquired about driving videos, indicating strong interest in the vehicle.
Neutral: The exchange included technical discussions regarding the car's modifications and features. @JetCity993RS questioned the authenticity of the red-painted 'S', while @BillG993 clarified that it wasn't a factory option but speculated it could have been dealer-modified. The seller, @DanRWC, confirmed the red 'S' was indeed done by a local body shop and shared details about the car's original parts and modifications. There was also talk regarding the hardback seats' material; @BillG993 stated they were not carbon fiber, while @DanRWC confirmed this was true for factory seats but mentioned that the seats were custom from another source. Additionally, several commenters discussed the history and rarity of the 993 model.
Negative: Some comments reflected concerns about the car's modifications and potential value depreciation from modernization. @mflee92 worried that a big-time shop might alter its classic integrity. The conversation surrounding reinterpretations of factory features implied skepticism about maintaining original authenticity amidst modifications that might affect the resale value. @samsnj directly inquired about past bodywork or repainting during the seller's ownership, hinting at concerns over the vehicle's condition. @ThrasherBear and others expressed curiosity about the materials of the hardback seats, indicating a lack of clarity on modifications and reinforcing a sense of uncertainty about the vehicle's authenticity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Bschurr appreciates the vehicle's color and features, particularly highlighting the classic Thunderbird Blue gauge needles. @greenerdays11 (The Seller) emphasizes that the car has been well-preserved, showcasing its exceptional condition with low mileage, clean history, and no reported accidents. Additional maintenance has been performed, ensuring the vehicle remains in great shape for new ownership, adding to the positive sentiment of potential buyers who see value in a one-owner, time-capsule car.
Neutral: @greenerdays11 (The Seller) mentions the original tires are still mounted on the vehicle for preservation purposes but suggests that they should be replaced for safety before regular road use. Additionally, all accessories are included with the car, which adds practical value and convenience for the new owner. The seller also addresses questions about the hard top stand and its transportability, indicating a willingness to provide information to potential buyers.
Negative: @Rjacaway raises concerns regarding the discrepancies in the mileage reported by CARFAX, suggesting a lack of clarity that may deter interested buyers. @EdFried points out possible issues with bushings and ride quality related to the vehicle's age and low mileage. @greenerdays11 (The Seller) acknowledges the concerns but reassures prospective buyers that the vehicle has been consistently serviced and inspected, asserting that the original components are still in good condition, despite the worries expressed.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Triumph27 expressed admiration for the Body Color Exterior Accents package, particularly on the Orange car, noting its cool appearance despite being a costly addition at $995. @gman111111 agreed wholeheartedly, emphasizing the E-Ray as the most beautiful among the C8 corvettes. This enthusiasm for the vehicle's aesthetics highlights the appreciation among potential buyers for its unique features. Additionally, several commenters including @badcad remarked positively on the car's low mileage and color, suggesting that these factors might favorably influence its auction value.
Neutral: Comments reflected a mix of curiosity and concern regarding the vehicle's auction prospects and specifications. @MILES2001 inquired about the sound of the exhaust in driving videos, mentioning the interest in the auction dynamics based on previous sales data of similar models. @JHBBII shared insights on the pricing trends of the Z06s on an auction site, indicating an observed depreciation pattern which could be valuable for understanding market conditions. The Seller, @tacshose, interacted with users to clarify details about the auction process and the car's ownership history, suggesting an open line of communication.
Negative: The discussion also revealed some apprehensions about the car's resale value. @MILES2001 noted that a high volume of coupes compared to convertibles could impact buyer interest. @JHBBII mentioned the increasing supply of "special" C8s putting downward pressure on resale values, and several commenters indicated concerns about maintaining high auction reserves in a shifting market. Additionally, there were mentions of a small blemish at the driver door, which may raise questions about the car's condition in the eyes of potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @GDogg describes the vehicle as a great-looking Series III, indicating that it has an appealing design and potentially attractive features. They express good wishes, adding a positive note to their comment which reflects an appreciation for the vehicle's appearance.
Neutral: @labboypro raises an interesting question about a unique binnacle observed in the vehicle, asking if it is specific to Colombia or a feature from a 1980s model. This inquiry suggests the vehicle has some distinctive elements that may warrant further clarification. Meanwhile, @alpecsa seeks confirmation of a clear title in the seller's name, indicating a common concern among potential buyers regarding ownership and documentation.
Negative: @Jeff-Lacy poses tough questions about the vehicle's condition, suggesting that its operational history might have been misrepresented in previous listings. The comment hints at concerns over the vehicle being used aggressively or without proper maintenance. In a similar vein, @95S4 notes the surprisingly low bid with just one day left in the auction, which points to a potential lack of interest or value perceived by others compared to what the vehicle might warrant.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @mallthus highlighted that the vehicle offers a unique opportunity to own a truck that was quite competitive when it was new, suggesting its rarity could be appealing to some buyers.
Neutral: @DamonEmily addressed various questions from potential buyers, clarifying that the A/C compressor's power cuts out if the button is jiggled, indicating an intermittent connection issue. The seller also assured @Artemis209 that the vehicle will pass smog tests and that they would provide the necessary documentation for California buyers like @Smillinpat, confirming the vehicle's readiness for registration.
Negative: Despite the vehicle's potential, there seems to be some confusion regarding specific features, such as the A/C functionality and the concept of 'odometer flip' mentioned by @dasdsanti, which may raise concerns about the vehicle's condition among prospective buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @osteome shares a positive experience with their own 2007 X3, expressing its fun driving experience and ease of maintenance, particularly noting its unique 6-speed manual transmission which adds to the enjoyment. They compliment the seller's vehicle as exceptionally clean with all necessary maintenance items seemingly addressed, suggesting it could easily reach over 200k miles with proper care. @JGraham also highlights the vehicle's rarity, encouraging potential buyers to bid frequently and significantly, which reinforces its desirability.
Neutral: @JenniferBoulder, the seller, provides insights into the vehicle's history, mentioning she is only the second owner, with the first having it in California before she took ownership in Colorado and now Washington. She indicates that the car has been garaged its entire life and assures that it's well-loved, though she is looking for something smaller. Her interactions suggest a willingness to cooperate by providing more details about the vehicle's specifications and features, although she also expresses some constraints related to her personal circumstances, affecting her ability to answer questions promptly.
Negative: There are some concerns raised by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's missing original components, such as the rear cargo cover and original wheels. @MMFIVE queries about these components and @aldogg7 asks for additional specifics about the tow hitch, reflecting a bit of unease regarding the completeness of the vehicle's offerings. @JenniferBoulder acknowledges that certain items are not available due to her situation, which could potentially deter some buyers who want the complete package.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The vehicle has been received positively by several commentors, with @00SolarTJ1 complimenting its appearance, noting it looks like a nice Disco II. @Gaetano8 also chimed in, referring to it as a beautiful Disco. @Brandon_E (The Seller) expressed confidence in the vehicle's condition, confirming that the head gaskets are good and providing reassurance about its maintenance. Additionally, the seller emphasized the truck's reliability, stating they've been driving it daily without significant issues. Further, he committed to providing more visuals and information as requested by interested buyers.
Neutral: There are neutral inquiries regarding the vehicle's specific features and current state. Commentors like @ghostrunneron requested underneath photos of the rear quarter chassis and the two curved arms on either side of the gas tank. @howeallen asked whether the catalytic converters have been changed and if the check engine light has ever come on. These comments show a level of interest and curiosity about the vehicle’s technical status but do not indicate any red flags or particular concerns. Additionally, @Brandon_E (The Seller) acknowledged the surface rust and that he plans to address it if the vehicle doesn't sell, indicating awareness of its condition without expressing alarm.
Negative: Despite the overall positive feedback, there are a few concerns raised by potential buyers. @FlyingMuleRider pointed out that there aren't enough detailed photos to make a serious assessment of the vehicle, which could be seen as a drawback for serious buyers. The issues with video uploads and potential delays in providing requested video content were noted, which could frustrate potential buyers looking for timely information. Furthermore, @ghostrunneron remarked on the issue with a video only being one second long, suggesting inconsistencies in the seller's attempts to share detailed content about the vehicle.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @bferrar praises the vehicle, calling it a "Beautiful Jag" and expressing admiration for its color and overall appearance, even noting improvements made with new wheels. @alexg182, the seller, highlights the car's incredible paint job and low mileage, presenting it as a well-maintained example that rides fantastically. @MoonlightDrive shares his experience with the XJS model, stating they are enjoyable if maintained properly, and @green88 confirms the car's cleanliness and reliability, encouraging potential buyers not to worry about minor hood adjustments, attributing concerns to user handling rather than vehicle issues.
Neutral: Several comments from @Klm50 and @Pourman seek more information regarding the car's functionality. @Klm50 asks about the electrical systems and requests videos demonstrating the driving and top operations. @Pourman inquires about the presence of a CD player and the condition of the A/C system. @alexg182, the seller, responds promptly, reassuring bidders about the quality and functionality of the vehicle while navigating questions about logistics, such as tax implications for buyers in New Mexico and shipping arrangements.
Negative: @Scottedwards3 and @Mrhoppy raise concerns regarding the vehicle's hood, questioning whether it closes properly. @alexg182 reassures bidders that the hood is secure, attributing concerns to mere adjustments rather than significant issues. @Woodie63 corroborates this claim, stating that latching problems are common with this model, while @Mrhoppy continues to stress the importance of addressing hood adjustments, hinting at potential misgivings from a buyer's perspective.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several comments highlighted the car's unique aspects, such as its believed one-off color scheme and attractive features like perforated leather seat inserts and carbon fiber trim. @zildjian11 commended the seller for being upfront about maintenance needs, suggesting that with proper budgeting, the car is a good investment, especially since it's a rare final model with low mileage. Furthermore, @footnfan noted the impressive condition of the carbon fiber trim, indicating that the car has been well cared for over the years and is visually appealing, making it a worthy purchase for enthusiasts.
Neutral: Comments from @bigdogcars, the seller, provided detailed information about the car's history and features, noting it was built for the 2003 New York Auto Show and is part of a collection. @cadillacbob1968 raised valid questions about the vehicle's title and condition, receiving prompt and informative responses from the seller, contributing to a respectful dialogue about the auction. General appreciation for the craftsmanship in the DB7 was voiced, especially regarding the durability of its paintwork, which suggests positive long-term ownership experiences.
Negative: Despite the general affinity for the car, concerns also emerged, particularly regarding the maintenance tasks that need to be addressed, such as replacing valve cover gaskets and spark plugs, with costs estimated between $10,000 to $15,000. @tdg1515 expressed skepticism about the expenses involved, hinting at the potential for additional problems that may arise. @footnfan cautioned that while aftermarket modifications like the A/V system could be reverted, sourcing original parts may present challenges, and cost considerations were emphasized to potential bidders.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments reflect a strong appreciation for the Corvette, with users like @GBRBiLL describing it as a "very nice C2" and expressing fondness for its Ermine White color. @stigbeve also admires the vehicle, calling it a "beautiful Corvette." The seller, @CDrestore, is engaging positively with potential buyers, providing detailed information about the vehicle's history and promising to share additional pictures of the VIN and trim tag, enhancing buyer confidence.
Neutral: The discussion includes a focus on the vehicle's history and condition, with @66Corvettes asking specific questions about the paint's originality and the VIN tag's attachment. @CDrestore responds constructively by detailing the car's movement across states and the history of ownership, indicating that he will provide further information. This exchange captures a sense of curiosity and thoroughness as interested parties seek clarification on various aspects of the vehicle.
Negative: There are some concerns raised about the VIN plate, specifically by @stigbeve, who points out that it appears to have been reattached with brass rivets instead of the original factory welds. Although this is noted as a curious point rather than a dealbreaker, it introduces a thread of uncertainty regarding the vehicle's authenticity and modifications. The other commenters, including @66Corvettes, similarly express curiosity about this detail, indicating potential issues that could affect buyer perceptions.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the vehicle for its exceptional condition and low mileage. @2002WS6 expressed their positive experience with a similar car, highlighting its durability and reliability. @mpeng510 reminisced about their own early experiences with a Camry, calling this one 'basically off the lot new.' @Calamari_Jujutsu, a die-hard Toyota fan, was moved by the car's condition, wishing the seller good luck with the auction. @Dollycat3 described the car as 'absolutely exceptional,' while @InHisImage84 noted its excellent mechanical performance and features, emphasizing that the car is truly 'like new.'
Neutral: The seller, @MBHAuto, provided detailed background information about the vehicle's history, explaining that it was acquired from an elderly couple who maintained it well. They shared that the car had only been driven occasionally and had been kept in a garage for most of its life. They also noted that it currently has only 5,547 miles on the odometer and mentioned the importance of seeing the car in person or having a third-party inspection. @malibu88 raised a question about a whine from the engine, and @MBHAuto responded that there are no abnormal noises and that the car is 100% mechanically sound.
Negative: Some commenters expressed skepticism about the car's sound and overall valuation. @malibu88 questioned a high whine from the engine, wondering if it could be related to the power steering pump or the compressor. @Ben_Drinking_Coffee made a sarcastic remark regarding the car's appearance, suggesting it felt out of place on the auction site as a 'beige Toyota Camry.' Despite these concerns, the majority of comments were overwhelmingly positive, showcasing a general admiration for the vehicle's rarity and condition.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Commenters expressed admiration for the overall aesthetic and performance modifications of the vehicle. @Valiantjim described it as an "awesome double salvage" with praise for the interior swap that accompanies the Hellcat engine, which he suggests is an impressive combination. @red92901 remarked on the car's beauty, mentioning their enthusiasm for daily driving it, while @C3Lee stated that, despite the car's complicated history, he still has a strong desire for the combination of the Chrysler 300 with the Hellcat motor, indicating a positive perception of the vehicle's performance potential.
Neutral: Several commenters asked for additional information regarding the car's history and specifications, indicating an ongoing curiosity about its background and modifications. @Dogman07 emphasized the need for clarity around the engine and transmission details, while @Bigelvis321 questioned the reasons for the seller's quick selling decision. @JamesSief (The Seller) offered transparency by stating that he has the full VIN report and has contacted the shop responsible for the modifications, pointing to a constructive dialogue between the seller and potential buyers. Some users even speculated about the car's past, including its sale history at Barrett-Jackson, with @lsdills confirming its previous auction status.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's complicated history and details were raised by multiple commenters, notably @C3Lee who discussed the car's tumultuous past on the Carfax report, which noted it was stolen, recovered, and totaled multiple times. @CaliforniaClassicCars critiqued the implication that the vehicle's swap was performed by a mere inspection station rather than a repair shop, expressing shrewd doubts about the legitimacy of the modifications. Additionally, comments from @70GTO455HO highlighted skepticism about the overall reliability of the vehicle due to its history, signaling that some users remained cautious about proceeding with a purchase.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @wyospence (The Seller) expresses confidence in the vehicle's condition, stating it is the cleanest 87 250X he has seen and emphasizing its history as a gently used bike stored indoors. He mentions that the bike has been made street legal with a horn, license plate holder, and custom battery box while being ready to return to stock with the original tool kit and parts. Additionally, he offers to assist with shipping and storage for the ATV.
Neutral: @Hopeless-55, a potential buyer, mentions he already owns one of these vehicles and is bidding based on the assumption that it runs well. He requests a video of the ATV running and pictures of the rear chassis with the rear fender removed, which the seller agrees to provide. This interaction indicates a level of interest and trust in the vehicle's capabilities, contingent on the requested information being satisfactory.
Negative:
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Wpark12 described the car as beautiful and expressed a temptation to buy another, indicating a high level of satisfaction. @MrSavageTheGSD shared their experience with a similar vehicle, noting excellent performance and fuel efficiency of 40MPG, which translates to over 500 miles per tank. Overall, the car is perceived positively, with comments highlighting its aesthetics, comfort, and driving experience.
Neutral: @fredvassau (The Seller) addressed concerns about surface rust, clarifying that it predominantly appears on bolts and did not seem to affect any body parts. He recounted his maintenance of the vehicle, including routine oil changes and brake flushes, and mentioned the car's history in a wet climate before moving to Denver. @HungryPanda78, while appreciative of the seller's explanation, raised an inquiry about why the rust had not been rectified before listing the vehicle, indicating a need for more care in presentation.
Negative: @Rancholoco noted concerns about surface corrosion, voicing a worry that it might deter potential buyers. @HungryPanda78 also mentioned the rust as a significant issue, suggesting that it should have been addressed prior to the sale to enhance the car's appeal. These comments underscore buyers' apprehensions regarding the vehicle's condition, which could ultimately impact its marketability.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @RandyCoyle praises the vehicle, noting its nice appearance with 'Nice Beeza' and expresses curiosity about the original fiberglass tank and its sealing status. @rdorfmeyer appreciates that the original tank is included and remarks on its great condition, emphasizing its importance to the Spitfire's identity. @thornatty simply acknowledges the vehicle's appeal with 'Nice Spitfire!', demonstrating a positive sentiment towards it.
Neutral: @quincydubois asks about the lack of mentioned issues with the bike, seeking confirmation that there are none while also noting the mounting position of the shocks. @Rapido identifies their allegiance as a Triumph enthusiast but refrains from interacting further with the auction process, indicating ambivalence towards the vehicle's bidding.
Negative: @DaveD comments on the odometer suggesting that the mileage is suspiciously low, likening it to a 'jackpot' scenario in Vegas which implies skepticism about its authenticity. @Slinkert mentions specific features such as the font brake and aluminum rims without further elaboration, which could suggest indifference or an unclear stance on their value.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the condition and features of the Toyota Tacoma, with @Inknjeeps calling it a clean looking Taco and @Laverdude describing its sharp appearance. @Vintage4x4Collector (The Seller) responds to inquiries about maintenance, indicating that the truck has no fluid leaks and that, aside from some cosmetic updates, it remains in the same excellent condition as when purchased. Additionally, @justpaul appreciates the details about the TRD package and engine, citing the original window sticker as confirmation of these details.
Neutral: A few participants expressed curiosity regarding the truck's history and maintenance, with @BusterBean asking about the frame reconditioning and @amonops6 requesting paint meter readings after an accident was noted on Carfax. Meanwhile, @trailghost inquires about the timing belt replacement and documentation for repairs, emphasizing a focus on maintenance aspects. @CDM4 questions whether the vehicle is smoke-free, to which the seller has provided reassurance based on the truck's condition.
Negative: Some skepticism arose regarding the vehicle's history and potential paintwork, with @Ange questioning the existence of a 4-cylinder TRD option and pointing out discrepancies. @Minitruckin93 and @Akwagon expressed doubt about the undercarriage treatment, suggesting possible overspray from painting processes. There were also concerns linked to the accident report, as @justpaul hypothesizes about the nature of the impact and its implications for the truck's integrity.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Loungin112 mentioned that it’s still a cool car and appreciated the honest pictures provided in the listing. This comment suggests that despite the errors, there is a positive perception of the vehicle's appearance and its appeal to potential buyers.
Neutral: @kayanacollins, the seller, acknowledged the previous errors in the listing and presented her situation as a 17-year-old girl who struggled with manual driving. She provided clarification about the car's model, highlighting that it is a Sil80 conversion and that the year discrepancy was due to misinterpretation from the dealership's information. Additionally, @bringatrailer confirmed that they updated the incorrect description based on community feedback. @thefinaljefe requested startup and driving videos, to which @kayanacollins responded she was working on obtaining them despite facing some issues with the car.
Negative: @mav1178 pointed out numerous errors in the car's description, including incorrect labeling of the vehicle type and year, and highlighted that many of the details had inaccuracies that may mislead potential buyers. He emphasized that the lack of research by the listing authors could misrepresent the car significantly, and advised the seller to better communicate with the listing service to amend these mistakes.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Several commenters appreciated the vehicle's aesthetics and nostalgic value. @OnlyVolvo240 described it as a "beautiful car for the right person," while @sstrasser25 reminisced fondly, claiming it was the "ultimate chick magnet" when he owned the same model in high school. Additionally, @VolvoDoug pointed out that the car might be a unique overseas delivery model, emphasizing its distinctive color not commonly found in the US market for that year, which sparked further admiration.
Neutral: The seller, @TheVintageGarage, provided detailed information about the vehicle's history and maintenance, stating that it has been well-cared for during its time under the current ownership. They addressed queries regarding the car's condition, highlighting that the A/C is functioning but not as cold as before, and confirmed that there are no noticeable repairs. The seller also mentioned that a thorough inspection is possible for interested buyers, maintaining transparency about the vehicle's condition and assisting with logistics for shipping.
Negative: Some concerns were raised about the vehicle's mechanical conditions, including questions about its overdrive functionality and whether it would pass smog checks in California, as mentioned by @coriguru. Additionally, @Jessejhj inquired about any residual damage from past repairs, and @PaulPerez questioned the status of the alternator despite reassurance from @TheVintageGarage that the vehicle was in good working condition. Overall, there were apprehensions about certain unknown mechanical aspects that could affect potential buyers.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Blizzard340 shared a nostalgic memory about their first FJ40, highlighting the joy of driving it through the scenic backroads of Montana. @GLWA,overton praised the FJ40 for its classic beauty and requested videos of it in action, appreciating the special location for photos. @Hdecker83 (The Seller) provided an emotional backstory about the FJ40, detailing the care put into its restoration and expressing hope that it finds a kind new owner, likening car enthusiasts to good individuals. @timberframe also complimented the FJ, offering a supportive 'Good Luck With The Auction' (GLWTA).
Neutral: @Jviel1104 inquired about the vehicle's highway speed capability, expressing concern about whether it could handle 70 mph for a commute. @Hdecker83 (The Seller) responded that the FJ40 prefers speeds between 60-65 mph but implied that it could potentially reach 70 mph with some testing. @OregonOzzy conversed about the driving speed with the intention of prioritizing safety, reminding others to be wary of potential mechanical issues and the need for proper maintenance. @supertek humorously shared their ownership experience, suggesting these vehicles are not designed for high speeds like modern trucks.
Negative: @Blizzard340 cautioned that while 65 mph is on the edge of comfortable for the FJ40, attempting 70 mph might be taxing, suggesting a more enjoyable speed of 55-60 mph. @OregonOzzy mentioned the reality of 'death wobble' and advised that the truck should be enjoyed at lower speeds to avoid hazards, echoing the need for a thorough inspection due to the vehicle's vintage nature. @supertek humorously reiterated the impracticality of driving an FJ40 at faster speeds, indicating that it’s not advisable and highlighting their personal experience with the vehicle's limitations.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many comments highlight the unique appeal and charm of this London taxi, with @MPETESS10 expressing a keen interest in owning one, stating his curiosity about its parts and Ford connections. @CoachBuilt shares that the vehicle draws more attention than even his luxury cars, emphasizing its quirky nature and limited production in left-hand drive versions. @ArtistFox comments on the excitement of seeing such a vehicle in a bustling area like New York City, indicating the vehicle's ability to stand out in a crowd.
Neutral: The seller, @TheVintageGarage, provides detailed information about the car's history, usage, and condition, explaining that it was purchased with approximately 16,000 miles and has been used for local driving since then. They also note the mechanical features and overall functionality of the vehicle, including the working air conditioning and the original parts included with the sale. Shipping quotes to various locations are shared as well, and the seller encourages potential buyers to reach out for any further queries or information.
Negative: Concerns about the vehicle's condition were raised, with @TheVintageGarage outlining flaws such as paint fading and oxidation on the roof, along with mechanical issues like a non-retractable radio antenna. @CoachBuilt mentions the potential difficulty in sourcing parts due to limited availability of left-hand drive models in the U.S., warning that maintenance could be challenging. Additionally, other comments discuss the vehicle's performance limits, indicating it is not ideal for highway driving and has a noise characteristic that might not appeal to everyone.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @buttesilverbow expressed admiration for the vehicle, calling it a "stunner" and noting its unique colors. @RBBarkley appreciated the detailed restoration, specifically asking about the 3-point seat belts, which indicates a high level of interest in the vehicle's safety features. @Wafago complimented the truck’s showroom condition and highlighted the thoroughness of the restoration work done by @matchmark, emphasizing confidence in the quality of the vehicle.
Neutral: @matchmark provided an enthusiastic backstory about the truck's restoration, mentioning it was purchased last year and detailing the work done, including repainting and addressing all window seals. He acknowledged minor imperfections in the paint while praising the overall outcome and engine performance, indicating a passion for the project. Additionally, @Hairball shared insights from his own experience with a similar truck and compared details, showing a connection to the vehicle's history.
Negative: There were minor mentions of possible concerns, such as @Surfender90 recalling a negative experience with seat belts when purchasing what he thought was a pair, suggesting a potential area for buyer caution. @Hairball noted his previous truck leaked oil, hinting at common problems with older vehicles. However, these comments did not detract significantly from the overall positive reception of the truck.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @stugottz expressed a fondness for the vehicle, describing it as "pretty cool" and associating it with the classic film, "It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World". This suggests that the vehicle has a nostalgic and whimsical appeal, evoking memories of fun and adventure. The comment reflects a positive sentiment towards the vehicle's design and cultural significance, alongside a friendly wish of "GLWTA" (Good Luck With The Auction) which further emphasizes a supportive attitude.
Neutral: There are no neutral comments included in the summary, as the available comments are predominantly positive and do not contain observations that are indifferent or factual without an opinion.
Negative: No negative comments were found in the provided feedback about the vehicle, indicating that the overall sentiment towards it remains favorable.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @Tholocas375 mentions that the vehicle runs great and has a strong engine, which brings confidence to potential buyers. He emphasizes the upgrades made to restore the car to its original state, including the meticulous replacement of window scrapers that enhance the overall aesthetic. Commenter @horsarev praises the vehicle's appearance, referring to it as a 'beaut' and thanking @Tholocas375 for listing it.
Neutral: @Tholocas375 provides detailed responses to inquiries regarding the air conditioning system, stating that although the A/C does not yet function with R-134a, a new compressor has been added. He assures @vwlover77 that there are no fluid leaks, having previously dealt with a coolant reservoir issue. Furthermore, he addresses @horsarev's concerns about the catalytic converter, explaining that the car is being registered in a state without stringent emissions tests, alleviating some worries regarding the emissions system.
Negative: However, some concerns are raised regarding the car’s condition. @Smercer questions the quality of the paint finish and repair work done on the car, expressing the need for more details about rust and bumper repairs. @Tholocas375 acknowledges that the repaint requires better trimming and highlights some fogging in places, indicating that while the repairs were solid, the overall finish isn't perfect and may require further inspection.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: Many commenters praised the aesthetic beauty and design of the Singer Classic, with @Dollycat3 describing it as "absolutely stunning" and others like @Thindor expressing a wish to own one. @GDogg noted the epic nature of the car's photos, while @Hoppy18 remarked on how the paint color is reminiscent of fine champagne, likening it to a "tall glass of stunning." Enthusiasts like @gmam111111 and @Mrs.Sofia highlighted its exquisite build quality and craftsmanship, emphasizing how the car embodies luxury and style. Overall, the vehicle was characterized as a modern work of art, with @PS1969 encouraging whoever wins to drive and enjoy it rather than worry about preserving mileage.
Neutral: The conversation also included practical discussions about the car's features and specifications. @CompassRacing (The Seller) provided insights into the VIN for the car, clarifying that there were two different VINs due to ISO compliance requirements. Several users discussed logistical aspects such as the fuel filler placement, with @TexasMule humorously warning about the risks to the paint job when filling up. Comments like @motorlove suggested that while modern reimaginings like the Singer are attractive, one could also question the value of purchasing a reimagined car compared to an original classic. Additionally, @DrKid pointed out that driving a Singer could be made compliant with smog regulations in California, addressing potential concerns from bidders.
Negative: Conversely, not all feedback was positive. Some commenters, like @motorlove, expressed skepticism regarding the practicality and originality of a reimagined car, which they viewed as a sign of disposable income rather than genuine passion for the automotive experience. @RonW found the central gas cap placement unattractive and awkward. Others, like @NHPiper, inquired about the wear on the driver-side leather, with an overall concern for the car's actual usability versus its status as a collector's item. The cost was also a sticking point, with users remarking on the hefty price tags for certain features, prompting comments like @Eurobiker4 to question the absurdity of the luxury options available.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: @loggdon expressed admiration for the Rod’s progress, praising its color choice, wheel and tire combination, and overall stance, indicating that much of the hard work is already complete. @ronPC highlighted the immaculate build quality, describing the paint as similar to candy root beer and noting the high cost of labor for such a finish. @pronto1952 echoed sentiments of hope for the car's completion, recognizing the effort put into the project while acknowledging the challenges faced by the previous owner.
Neutral: Comments from @Flashbang5 (The Seller) provided clarification on questions raised by potential buyers regarding the vehicle's details and specifications. For instance, the seller confirmed that the front and rear glass had not been cut, and that some finishing work is still needed, including assembly and interior tasks. There were also inquiries about the state of the wiring and taillights, which the seller addressed directly, indicating that the right taillight was functional while the left required housing.
Negative: Several commenters expressed concerns regarding the vehicle's unfinished state, with @bobsBuild raising specific questions about fit issues and the interior, revealing potential misalignments in the door and window openings. @Merc51 questioned the lengthy duration since the car’s last completion status update, while @19Fordy indicated that significant investment might have been misallocated, causing concern over the remaining work needed to finish the project. Overall, there was a sentiment that more effort and resources are necessary to bring the car to its final form.
![]() |
![]() |
Positive: The comments about the 2008 Mercedes-Benz G500 highlight its solid performance and overall appeal. @Simonsays1, the seller, notes that the vehicle has been a fun and reliable daily driver, having driven it around 5,000 miles since purchasing in 2025. Many potential buyers appreciate the strong pull of the V8 engine and the attention it garners on the road. The seller confidently states that everything works as intended and emphasizes that the G500, while not a concours example, is well-maintained and presents nicely for its age, complete with its original Jet Black paint. Additionally, the inclusion of upgraded AMG G63 wheels adds to its visual appeal, while both sets of wheels are included in the sale, providing options for potential buyers.
Neutral: Some comments focus on logistics and specific features of the vehicle, indicating an interest from potential buyers. @MT8814 raises questions regarding shipping logistics and the functionality of the three lockers, to which @Simonsays1 responds promptly with reassurance about their engagement and offers to help with shipping coordination. There is a mutual respect in the interactions, with @Simonsays1 being responsive and accommodating to inquiries, not shying away from discussing the vehicle's history and its current condition. Furthermore, @Walkertheo inquires about the suspension components and any recent work done, prompting an informative response from the seller about recent maintenance, reinforcing transparency in the selling process.
Negative: Concerns were raised regarding the vehicle's rust condition. @Subspd noted the presence of rust in the door sill and sought further clarification on possible bubbling around windows or the condition of the paint on the roof. Although @Simonsays1 provided some details about minor subsurface paint lifting around the windshield and a couple of small exterior spots, these issues might deter potential buyers who prioritize a vehicle in pristine condition. There seems to be an underlying caution among interested parties like @Subspd, reflecting unease over the vehicle's potential hidden flaws, which can impact buyer confidence.
![]() |





















































































































































































